Natalie (20:09)
Well, let's do a little study, shall we? Okay, here's a good book. If you're interested in learning about Hezbollah, if you actually study Hezbollah, not the way Hillary Clinton uses them as a boogeyman, but what they actually are, you will understand the entire reason that Hezbollah was founded was to resist Israel's oppression of Arabic people. They were created when Israel invaded Lebanon in the 1980s. And they are extremists who believe that anyone connected to Western influence is fair target, including Americans and Israelis. They have no focus on South Americans at all. In fact, they are such Muslim extremists that they execute their own people in their own ranks, even for minor corruption. And their jihad forbids drug use and drug selling. Is there Any proof though that they have sort of went outside their borders to enrich themselves with the drug trade in South America? There is not. Are there Lebanese people involved in the drug trade in South America? Sure, just like there are Italians, Colombians, Americans even. You know, this would be the equivalent of Rubio saying, well, there are Catholic churches in Venezuela, so the Vatican is plotting a war, but can we prove it? To fundraise for a war with Hezbollah, which gets us. If we go, as my grandma would say, go around your elbow to get to your backside, then can we get that war we want with Iran? I have not seen proof, but there are mountains of proof that the US intelligence agencies have had their hand in the drug war in South America for decades. That part's magically left out. Now the Wall Street Journal here they are running cover for the war that the administration wants saying, oh yes, cocaine routes in Venezuela are absolutely a part of some Islamic Jihad pipeline. What they leave out here is the longstanding history of the CIA's role in the South American drug trade, including the biggest scandal of all, Iran Contra. So it was us that was supplying weapons to Iran and extremists in order to fund the drug trade. We did that. So for Marco Rubio to say, Iran's doing that, but we did that. That's why the cartels were empowered. Okay, that's not mentioned at all. Is this the craziest thing? The CIA literally enabled cocaine networks through South America or Central America, especially during the 1980s. They did collaborate with the Venezuelan National Guard generals who moved tons of cocaine into the United States. Exactly. 60 Minutes reported this in the 1990s when they still did good reporting. The US built, funded, trained and shielded many of the military and police units in Latin America that later became the cartel. How do we know this? Not just from. I'm going to show you another book if we're collecting libraries today. This book, if you read this, you will not buy any of this BS out. Alfred McCoy has been a whistleblower about the CIA's role in the drug trade for decades. If we had listened to him, we would have been much better off. Not just his great reporting though, in the late 8 1998, rather than there was this CIA report called the Hits Report that concluded that the CIA did participate in cocaine trafficking during the Contra war and knowingly maintained relationships with and protected numerous Contra linked individuals involved in the drug trade. And they hid this from Congress. Now here's the kicker. The Iran in Iran Contra comes from the US secretly selling weapons to Iran illegally. Then Funneling the profits to the Contras. The same network tied to the cocaine trafficking. It was all one pipeline. Strange that the, that the Wall Street Journal leaves that out, right? That it's, it's all along ben Iran, where they get that money to begin with. It's always been us. Now what our role is in this now, I don't know. Most likely this did not stop. This to me now shows how Rubio can kind of lazily recycle an old narrative and point the finger at Venezuela and then Iran without any proof. It's as bad as weapons of mass destruction. I will follow it because, you know, when the administration says Iran has a nuke, we look it up. We have not. We read the books, we talk to the experts. We haven't found it. Usually we come up empty when we follow a government war propaganda. But okay, we'll look. Now Nick Fuentes was on Infowars recently. He said that this Muslim problem in the United States in is not what right wing politicians claim and that it's being used to sell us further wars in the Middle East. He's right about that. The U.S. muslim population is about 1%. There is no demographic path to any kind of cultural takeover. That seems to be increasingly a right wing talking point. Where is it again, show me the evidence. Here he is saying that this is a manufactured war preparing the public for a war that the administration, the government wants. Watch.
