Podcast Summary: "He's EXPOSING the W.H.O. And Its Secret Dark History | Redacted Conversation"

Release Date: July 9, 2025

Introduction

In this episode of Redacted News, hosts Natali and Clayton Morris delve into the intricate and controversial workings of the World Health Organization (WHO). Their guest, James Roski, a seasoned researcher, author, natural health advocate, and activist, joins the conversation to shed light on what he perceives as the WHO's hidden agendas and its entanglement with powerful corporate interests.

Guest Introduction and Background

[01:00] Clayton Morris introduces James Roski, highlighting his extensive experience over three decades in exposing alleged deceit by the government, media, and the pharmaceutical industry, which Roski refers to as the "Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex (FHEIC)".

James Roski shares his journey into health research, starting in 1996 when he managed a nutrition store in California. His deep skepticism towards the WHO intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic after discovering documents submitted by the Bush administration to amend international health regulations.

WHO Foundations and History

[10:21] Clayton Morris prompts Roski to explore the origins of the WHO, tracing its roots back to post-World War II efforts to address global health concerns exacerbated by poor sanitation and widespread disease.

James Roski responds by referencing the 1946 Geneva Conference and the official establishment of the WHO in 1948, signed into existence by President Harry Truman. He emphasizes that while the organization initially focused on improving global sanitation and health standards, its mission has been increasingly influenced by external financial donors over the past two decades.

WHO's Funding and Donors

[18:00] James Roski discusses the financial dynamics of the WHO, pointing out that traditional member state contributions have dwindled, leading the organization to rely heavily on donations from foundations like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gavi, the European Commission, and various NGOs and nonprofits. He argues that these donors impose "strings attached" restrictions, steering the WHO's policies to favor pharmaceutical interests over genuine public health improvements.

Roski asserts, "What they've allowed to happen to the World Health Organization is to allow funders from these various groups to give money with strings attached... their goal is to serve their donors, not to serve the people of the world and improve our health." [06:58]

International Health Regulations and Amendments

Clayton directs the conversation towards the International Health Regulations (IHR), emphasizing their significance in global health governance.

James Roski explains that while the original IHRs were designed to facilitate safe international travel and trade by managing public health risks, recent amendments have expanded the WHO's authority in ways he finds alarming. He points out specific articles, such as Article 31, which allows nations to impose health measures (e.g., mandatory testing, treatments, vaccinations) on travelers, effectively overriding individual rights when entering a country's territory.

Roski highlights, "Their philosophy was not individual rights and freedoms, but a collective view of how to treat the world... it's absolutely absurd." [07:06]

Pandemic Treaty and Current Status

The discussion shifts to the WHO Pandemic Treaty, a focal point of controversy.

[31:17] Clayton Morris questions the implications of the treaty, particularly concerning national sovereignty and the potential for global overreach by unelected globalists.

James Roski provides a detailed account of the treaty's progression, noting the June 1, 2024 adoption of amendments and the looming July 19 deadline for nations to reject these changes. He criticizes the process as opaque and dominated by corporate and pharmaceutical interests, arguing that the treaty could lead to "fascism with the 21st-century upgrade."

Roski elaborates on specific concerns, such as the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing System, which he believes incentivizes the discovery and commercialization of pathogens, thereby fueling unnecessary public health crises to profit the pharmaceutical industry.

Arguments Against WHO and Big Pharma Influence

Throughout the conversation, Roski presents a critical view of the WHO's relationship with Big Pharma and various NGOs. He contends that the WHO has transformed into a marketing arm for pharmaceutical companies, prioritizing profit over public health.

Key points include:

• Funding Manipulation: The WHO's reliance on donations with stipulations shapes its policies to favor the interests of major donors, undermining its original mission.

• Policy Control: Roski argues that the WHO's influence extends to national policies through IHR amendments, allowing it to dictate health measures that override individual and national sovereignty.

• Economic Exploitation: The proposed Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing System is seen as a mechanism to exploit biological diversity in poorer nations, turning indigenous knowledge into profitable pharmaceuticals without fair compensation.

Roski passionately states, "The WHO is essentially become the marketing and promotion arm of the Big Pharma... It's nothing natural, nothing that's truly health building. It's just a transfer of wealth." [56:21]

Conclusion

The episode concludes with a strong call to action. James Roski urges listeners to reject the WHO's amendments and the pandemic treaty, emphasizing the importance of national sovereignty and individual health responsibilities. He encourages proactive measures, such as investing in precious metals and rejecting policies that funnel public money into corrupt systems designed to harm rather than help.

Clayton Morris and James Roski reiterate the need for public awareness and resistance against what they perceive as the WHO's overreach and the pharmaceutical industry's malign influence on global health policies.

Notable Quotes

• James Roski [07:06]: "Their philosophy was not individual rights and freedoms, but a collective view of how to treat the world... it's absolutely absurd."

• James Roski [10:21]: "Sanitation was a big, big important issue... the WHO started after World War II... their philosophy was not individual rights and freedoms, but a collective view of how to treat the world."

• James Roski [23:14]: "Lobbying is, you know, probably really the best term to use... Bill and Melinda Gates being one of the biggest, along with Gavi and the European Commission."

• James Roski [56:21]: "The WHO is essentially become the marketing and promotion arm of the Big Pharma... It's nothing natural, nothing that's truly health building. It's just a transfer of wealth."

Final Thoughts

This episode of Redacted News presents a critical perspective on the WHO, emphasizing concerns about its funding sources, policy influence, and relationship with the pharmaceutical industry. James Roski articulates a narrative of institutional corruption and loss of national sovereignty, urging listeners to remain vigilant and take action against perceived global health governance overreach.