Kash Patel's FBI Shuts Down Charlie Kirk Assassination Foreign Intel Probe By Joe Kent

Summary

Redacted News: Episode Summary

Podcast: Redacted News
Hosts: Clayton Morris, Natali Morris
Key Guests: Jesse Merle, Colonel Don Davis, Professor Simon Holland, David Crayton
Date: October 31, 2025
Episode Title: Kash Patel's FBI Shuts Down Charlie Kirk Assassination Foreign Intel Probe By Joe Kent

---

Episode Overview

This episode of Redacted News focuses on explosive allegations regarding the FBI’s handling of the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation—especially the suppression of any probe into potential foreign involvement. Additionally, the episode covers a range of top stories: from controversial government actions in Canada (the ostrich culling scandal), to global nuclear brinkmanship, concerns over transparency in space science, and more. Principled skepticism toward official narratives—particularly from major government agencies and mainstream media—runs throughout, with numerous questions raised about the integrity and motivations of powerful institutions.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The FBI and the Charlie Kirk Assassination

• Main story: FBI Director Kash Patel has shut down the National Intelligence Agency's push, led by Joe Kent and Tulsi Gabbard, to investigate possible foreign links in the Charlie Kirk assassination.
• Key reporting: The New York Times has confirmed what the podcast reported back in September: senior FBI officials, the White House Chief of Staff Suzzy Wiles, and other high-ranking members blocked the foreign investigation on grounds it could interfere with prosecuting the supposed 'lone gunman' Tyler Robinson.
  • Natalie (04:45): “It is never the job of the government to look the other way… The notion that the FBI just can’t show its cards…well, they’ve already made their case to a judge…there shouldn’t be something else now that can hurt that case.”
• Concerns raised:
  • The FBI may be withholding or even fabricating evidence (Brady violations).
  • The disappearance (or possible non-existence) of key witness “Lance Twigs,” whose statements and status are deeply suspect.
  • Jesse Merle (08:47): “To me, there are so many threads to pull on to see if there are other people involved…you have to ask yourself, like, why is [Patel] doing this?”
  • Skepticism toward the FBI's rush to close the case and desire to shield the public from full transparency.

Notable Quotes:

• Clayton (03:28): “Kash Patel’s FBI just shut the door on investigating any foreign involvement in Charlie Kirk’s assassination, even though the NSA wants to do just that under Tulsi Gabbard.”
• Jesse Merle (08:47): “If that meeting had sensitive information or at the very least details about what happened there, leak, someone is very unhappy about what happened…My instincts would be that it would be the organization that was blocked from investigating foreign ties.”

[12:21]

• Natalie: “It’s one thing to say you can’t look into all the evidence. It’s another to say…where did that [supposed key witness] come from?”

---

2. Fabricated Narratives and Media Complicity

• Questioning mainstream media motives: The fact that the New York Times reported on the story without challenging the 'lone gunman' narrative leads to questions about why mainstream outlets participate in selective coverage or narrative-setting.

  • Natalie (11:06): “Why did the New York Times take this [story]?”
  • Jesse Merle (11:23): “If you have one of the leaders who is actively trying to keep other leaders from looking into the files…then you have to look at what their connections are to any foreign countries.”

---

3. Epstein, FBI, and Intelligence Agency Cover-ups

• Parallels drawn: The episode draws strong parallels between FBI “see-no-evil” handling of both the Kirk and Epstein stories.

  • Jesse Merle (13:23): “He [Patel] went in front of Congress and said into a microphone that the FBI had no evidence of anyone being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. It’s absurd…”

• Financial vs. Sex Crimes: Panelists speculate that intelligence agencies are more desperate to cover up financial crimes linked to Epstein than actual sex trafficking.

  • Phil (19:51): “I don’t think they care about the child trafficking…It’s the financial crimes…that they’re trying to bury.”

---

4. Potential Foreign Actors and Government Interests

• Foreign involvement: Panelists raise the possibility of foreign intelligence operations—Ukraine, Russia, China, Israel—potentially having an interest in Kirk’s assassination, especially given high political stakes and connections between current U.S. officials and foreign governments.

• Hypothesis on motives: The episode floats the idea that political business deals (such as those involving Jared Kushner in Gaza reconstruction) might shape US reaction and efforts to minimize explosive disclosures.

  • Jesse Merle (16:35): “You have Kushner and Trump, you have the Saudis, you have Israel, Peter Thiel, Elon…they want to build [a new] Singapore, Dubai…That amount of money…that’s been my theory on why there seems to be funny business going on there.”

---

5. Nuclear Brinkmanship: U.S., Russia, and the Perils of Escalation

• Putin's announcement: Russia’s new Poseidon nuclear underwater drone, designed for devastating “radioactive tsunamis.”

• U.S. response (Trump): The U.S. signals it will match Russian escalation, but experts question what new capabilities are being referenced.

• Expert commentary: Colonel Don Davis explains the context around anti-ballistic missile treaties, the meaning of “nuclear one-upsmanship,” and the actual destructive capabilities of current arsenals.

  • Don Davis (25:53): “Anytime you start talking about…nuclear one-upsmanship, that’s a bad thing.”

---

6. Canada: Ostrich Farm Culling, Government Secrecy, and Corruption

• Ongoing scandal: Independent journalist David Crayton reports on suspicious nighttime culling of ostriches at a family farm, government cover-up using “bird blenders” (alkaline hydrolysis machines), and alleged corruption linked to PM Mark Carney’s conflicts of interest in nuclear energy deals.
• Lack of media access: CFIA and RCMP block all external observers, refuse to disclose animal counts, and act as “enforcers” for political interests.
  • David Crayton (39:27): “There is something going on here and I’m just wondering how are they going to get away with this…they’ve obviously got some assurance from the Carney government that you’re going to get away with this.”

---

7. NASA, 3i Atlas, and Astronomical Secrecy

• The case: ‘3i Atlas’—an interstellar object—reaches perihelion (closest point to the Sun), but NASA refuses to release high-res images despite other countries’ assets tracking it.

• Science transparency debate: Professor Simon Holland explains why the object is unique (its composition and behavior), the importance of open data, and why the U.S. is being uncharacteristically secretive.

  • Professor Holland (63:34): “To this day NASA through JPL have not released the high-resolution pictures. It does seem really strange.”
  • Professor Holland (70:58): “Aliens and UAPs are real and they’re also global…what have we really done to turn it into some piece of technology that we can fly around? That’s my quest.”

---

8. Distrust in Official Stories and the Rise of Independent Media

• Audience engagement: The hosts poll their live audience, finding that 93% do not believe the official FBI story on Charlie Kirk.
  • Clayton (84:06): “I’m not saying any one person did it…there’s so many inconsistencies and problems, like, how can you not want to get to the bottom of this?”
• Broader context: The hosts repeatedly reference past government lies (JFK, 9/11, Oklahoma City, Mandalay Bay, etc.) as reasons for skepticism.
  • Phil (93:35): “It’d be a shorter list to find things they told us the truth about.”

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• Natalie Morris [04:45]: “It is never the job of the government to look the other way... It also seems like we should collectively want everybody to get a full trial, a fair trial—full stop.”
• Jesse Merle [08:47]: “My instincts would be that it would be the organization that was blocked from investigating foreign ties [that leaked the story]... There are so many threads to pull—domestic and foreign.”
• Phil [19:51]: “I don't think they care about the child trafficking, to be honest. I think it’s the financial crimes... they’re trying to bury.”
• Colonel Don Davis [25:53]: "Anytime you start talking about... nuclear one-upsmanship, that's a bad thing."
• Professor Simon Holland [63:34]: “To this day NASA through JPL have not released the high-resolution pictures. It does seem really strange."
• Clayton Morris [84:06]: “How can you not want to get to the bottom of this?”
• Phil [93:35]: "It’d be a shorter list to find things they told us the truth about."

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• FBI Shuts Down Foreign Probe in Kirk Assassination: 03:14 - 13:55
• Key Witness "Lance Twigs" and Timeline Problems: 07:20 - 15:40
• Why Mainstream Media Reports the Story Now: 11:06 - 11:23
• Cash Patel, Epstein, and Intelligence Connections: 13:23 - 15:43
• Putin’s Poseidon Drone & Nuclear Brinkmanship: 25:45 - 34:59
• Canada’s Ostrich Farm, Bird Blenders & Carney’s Corruption: 37:09 - 54:41
• 3i Atlas Interstellar Object, NASA Secrecy: 58:50 - 75:57
• Audience Poll & Media Skepticism: 83:03 - 99:27

---

Tone & Language

• The show maintains a skeptical, confrontational tone, openly critical of government agencies and mainstream media.
• Panelists are often incredulous, sardonic, and emphasize transparency, accountability, and critical thinking.
• Regular references to historical government cover-ups, a "follow the money" attitude, and a sense of fighting against elite complicity.
• Passionate appeals to collective skepticism: “How can you not want to get to the bottom of this?” (Clayton, 84:06)

---

Conclusion

This episode offers a wide-ranging, highly skeptical take on government narratives, focusing on the dubious closure of foreign investigations in the Charlie Kirk assassination (and alleged fabrication or destruction of evidence), the broader history of cover-ups from Epstein to nuclear treaties, suppression of transparency in both scientific and political fields, and the discouraging reality of official corruption (not just in the U.S.). The hosts and guests advocate strongly for independent media, rigorous public scrutiny, and a refusal to accept official stories at face value.

Transcript

[Clayton Morris]

It's 4pm Eastern time. Welcome in and live from the Rocky Mountains. This is redacted. I'm Clayton Morris.

[Natalie Morris]

I'm Natalie Morris.

[Clayton Morris]

And on this show, we cover the stories the mainstream media largely ignore as we try to sift through all of the propaganda. Fox News up Trump's ass. CNN virtually against Trump in any kind of capacity. We're gonna look at the details today of what's going on with China. The nuclear weapons deal, President Trump meeting with Xi Jinping. We're gonna unpack what this means for the future of the United States. Your dinner table, buying Chinese goods. All of that on the show today.

[Natalie Morris]

Bombshell report from the New York Times that the FBI is working against the National Intelligence Agency to bury any international ties to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Why would they do this? Ask yourself. Chat amongst yourself. Would love to hear your theories. We're gonna talk about it. It's infuriating.

[Clayton Morris]

Also, we're gonna talk about Canada today. Large blenders being brought into the universal ostrich farm up there in Canada to presumably blend up, kill off these ostriches. Drone footage is now showing maybe about half of the ostriches are still surviving in these farms. They're not allowed to get near it. We're going to talk about that, plus some cushy deal that Mark Carney has made around nuclear reactors.

[Philip]

We're going to talk about all of.

[Clayton Morris]

That, plus Three Eye Atlas. Today is the perihelion. Are we going to actually see images of this? Why is NASA hiding the images of the Three Eye Atlas interstellar object? Why? When all. There's. There's plenty of spacecraft that can actually image this thing. Well, we'll tell you, the EU is actually working to image this thing. We're gonna speak with a professor about that today on the show. So much to talk about here.

[Natalie Morris]

Indeed. We're gonna talk about this FBI interference and the Charlie Kirk assassination. But you know, Clayton, the FBI is so trustworthy. They told us that Epstein only ever trafficked ladies to himself, which is strange because Prince Andrew was just stripped of his titles in the UK in connection with Jeffrey Epstein. What do you think? That's. That's Weir. I mean, Epstein only ever trafficked ladies to himself.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah. No trafficking, not other people, just to himself.

[Natalie Morris]

Isn't that strange?

[Philip]

It is very strange.

[Clayton Morris]

But the FBI.

[Natalie Morris]

What are we to make of this now? I love palace intrigue. You know that. You guys yell at me when we do palace stories. I just am very curious on the fallout and what this means for the royal family. Also, do his daughters get to keep their titles? All of this looming questions. But again, how can Epstein have. I mean, the FBI is so trustworthy. Epstein trafficked to nobody.

[Philip]

Of course he did.

[Natalie Morris]

Right?

[Clayton Morris]

Don't talk about Epstein. We're not allowed to talk about it anymore? The FBI told you, nothing to see here. Don't talk about it.

[Natalie Morris]

Only losers talk about it.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, only losers or. Yeah, like. Or you're. I guess talking about Epstein makes you anti Semitic now.

[Philip]

I think that's the thing.

[Clayton Morris]

So I can't keep up with all of it. So whatever Dinesh d' Souza says, that's what we gotta go with these days.

[Natalie Morris]

Cool.

[Clayton Morris]

Okay. Hey, we got a website. Go over to our website, redacted.inc check it out. We've got tons of great new stuff over there. In fact, in our entire newest investing section over there as well. Check it all out. Redacted.in See, you can sign up for our newsletter as well, but it's brand new, and we're still putting all the spit and glue on it, but see if you guys can crash it.

[Philip]

By the way.

[Clayton Morris]

That's.

[Philip]

That's. That's always a good thing.

[Clayton Morris]

Redacted.inc is the place to go. But check it all out. Spend some time over there.

[Philip]

We're working hard on it.

[Clayton Morris]

Okay. Let's talk about this FBI investigation. Well, Cash Patel's FBI just shut the door on investigating any foreign involvement in Charlie Kirk's assassination, even though the NSA wants to do just that under Tulsi Gabbard.

[Philip]

Under DNI's.

[Clayton Morris]

Tulsi Gabbard. Now, we broke this story back on September 18th, did a whole video on it, by the way, on September 18th. I reported it weeks ago here on the show that sources close to the White House had told redacted that the FBI was ready to close their investigation, claiming that Tyler Robinson was the Lone Gunman. Nothing more to see here. We're not going to look at any foreign actors, any foreign involvement at all. We are done. We are done. Nothing to see here. Many of you were outraged, as I. As was I, that they would close this investigation so quickly, and rightly so. And then after a few days later, friend of the show, Alex Jones, in separate reporting from his own sources, confirmed what we had reported on September 18th. That they're done. Now, we didn't know at the time that Joe Kent was involved, and we didn't know the full details of why they were closing this investigation, just that it was done. Lone Gunman. Nothing to see here. Well, now we have full confirmation of this. The New York Times is now confirming what we reported back on September 18, that this happened back in September. They report that Joe Kent, friend of the show Joe Kent, who's been on our show multiple times, Director of Counterterrorism, alongside his boss, Tulsi Gabbard, wanted to look into foreign involvement in the Charlie Kirk murder. And Cash Patel is trying to shut that down, effectively shut it down.

[Natalie Morris]

Now, here's what the New York Times specifically is reporting, that the inquiry by Mr. Kent, who is the Director of counterterrorism, alarmed Cash Mattel and other senior officials, who the Daily Mail reports as other senior Cabinet members, plus White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, who we're gonna talk about in a second. They said that this investigation could potentially interfere with the prosecution of Tyler Robinson, but supporters are saying, well, actually, no, that's Mr. Kent's job is to run down all leads. It is never the job of the government to look the other way. I think we should all collectively agree on that. Right? It is never the job of the government to ignore something. Now, this was reportedly a contentious meeting, and again, it should be noted that Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles, was there. If this foreign intelligence has anything to do with Israel. This is interesting because we should remember that many senior trap Trump cabinet members worked in Netanyahu's 2020 reelection campaign, including Susie Wiles. So if there is anything foreign to a foreign government with which she has worked, that would be interesting. We know this from reporting earlier this year. So these are the people who are saying that we should not look into foreign intelligence, not look into foreign involvement. The excuse that they're giving, again, is that this can hurt their investigation. Their prosecution of Tyler Robinson, which has a few problems. One, it could mean that the FBI is withholding evidence, which is a violation of the Brady requirements, which requires prosecutors to hand over any evidence favorable to the defendant. It would. The notion that the FBI just can't show its cards. We've had guests even say that, well, they're in an active investigation, an active prosecution. They can't show us everything. Well, they've already made their case to a judge in order to get an indictment. So they're not. There should not be something else now that can hurt that case. If they've already brought the goods, and you should want them to bring the goods, it also seems like we should collectively want everybody to get a full trial, a fair trial, full stop. And it seems like they've decided that they don't want that. What they're saying is they don't want the public to see anything, to question their narrative, but that, that's, they're, they're, they're then telling the public only a selective story. So they are influencing a jury. Amongst all this is reporting that their key witness Lance Twigs is missing. If he in fact existed.

[Professor Simon Holland]

The lover.

[Clayton Morris]

The trans lover.

[Natalie Morris]

The trans. Alleged trans lover of the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson. Now remember, we had a major problem with Lance Twig's involvement in this in that according to their timeline, Tyler Robinson submitted himself to the police 33 hours after the assassination, which would have been about 9:30 or 10 at night. Then a few hours later they went and raided their home. They then they brought Lance Twigs in for questioning. This is now extending way into the night. By 8am the next day, the governor gives a very high profile press conference saying Tyler Robinson acted alone. We got the guy. So they didn't even start until midnight, their raid. But by 8am they were ready to say no. Lance Twigs had nothing to do with it. But we have these text messages that never made any sense to me. That one really sticks in my crawl. So joining us to discuss someone who's equally pissed about this is Jesse Merle from the Jesse on Fire Show. And welcome to the show.

[Clayton Morris]

Jesse, great to see you.

[Jesse Merle]

Thank you guys. Thanks for having me on. Big fan of the show.

[Clayton Morris]

Thank you so much. And you've been doing great work on this. So first let's wind the clock back a little bit on this Cash Patel piece. And Joe Kent, you've been doing some great work on this. Maybe you can walk us through sort of the intrigue here about this. I mean you have perhaps evidence we don't exactly know, but the fact that the dni, Tulsi Gabbard and Joe Kent wanted an investigation. What's wrong with an investigation? Like, let's get answers.

[Jesse Merle]

I agree. I think when you look at a story like this that comes out, I look at it from a couple of different perspectives. The first one being how did this story get out? Because what's being reported is a closed door meeting in the White House between two of the top leaders in the, you know, two of the largest intelligence organizations that we have, law enforcement and intelligence. And if, if that, that meeting had sensitive information or at the very least details about what happened there, leak, someone is very unhappy about what happened in that meeting. And my instincts would be that it would be the organization that was blocked from investigating foreign ties to anyone who's implicated in the Charlie Kirk assassination. The Question that I have is like, I understand that the FBI is going to try to protect their prosecution against Tyler Robinson. In their mind, they had a bow on this case. Whether they put the bow on it themselves or someone fed them a patsy or if it's really Tyler Robinson. And you know, but to me, there are so many threads to pull on to see if there are other people involved. And I'm talking just in terms of domestic people that are connected to Tyler Robinson. Let's say that their story is exactly what happened. You still have co conspirators, obviously. And I literally heard Cash Patel say that in the event that they found other, other radicals who were connected, that it was going to be the state that was going to prosecute those cases. I mean, I'm not super experienced in how the FBI operates in cases like this, but generally speaking, I've never heard of the FBI doing investigations that they're going to hand off to the state. You know what I mean?

[Clayton Morris]

So it was bungled from the beginning.

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

And there was a lot of criticism. Why the FBI swoop in anyway, Cash Patel shows up there, does a whole press conference, the whole thing. So he wanted the optics of this. We got the guy. In a matter of time. We got the guy. We got the guy. Case closed, you're done here. I think you're absolutely right that there was clearly a leak on purpose. Like I said, our reporting happened late September on this and there were people who were absolutely pissed that this was getting swept under the rug in the White House. I can tell you that full stop. So I think you're right about that. Whoever let this information out is pissed.

[Natalie Morris]

Well, I think we should also sort of put a pin in the fact that the New York Times reported it. The New York Times, which has not questioned the official narrative of lone shooter, which does not make sense to most rational, self respecting people. So we need to ask ourselves why the New York Times take this.

[Clayton Morris]

Right?

[Jesse Merle]

That's an excellent question. And I think that the other question too is, I mean, I know that everybody is kind of looking in one direction in terms of what foreign power would potentially be involved. But if you have one of the leaders who is actively trying to keep other leaders from looking into the files and what connections may be there, then you have to look at what their connections are to any foreign, foreign countries that might be implicated in this thing. And in terms of Cash Patel, you have a blaring, blaring problem in that he went on a press tour to tell the world that there's no Evidence of anyone trafficking or having. Having girls traffic to them by Jeffrey Epstein, which every person who has taken three minutes to look at that case knows is an outright lie. Like, and now the amount of evidence in. In that particular case that's come out very recently, the, you know, the leaked or the, the hidden camera that o' Keefe got the DOJ guy on, I mean, that's. That's damning. Virginia Giuffre's book that came out damning. You've got all kinds of stuff that we didn't know before. And he went in front of Congress and said into a microphone that the FBI had no evidence of anyone being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. It's absurd. And so why would they do that? Everybody knows, you know, what intelligence agency foreign was running Jeffrey Epstein. So now anything that involves this type of, you know, well, maybe it's them. If you have cash, jump in between, you know, you know, I don't know, exposure and repercussions in that country, then you got to ask yourself, like, why is he doing this? You know, like, why. What's. What's the motivation for him to be jumping in between them and, and, you know, potential repercussions for any of the things that we're talking about and who.

[Natalie Morris]

Specifically is fabricating evidence then? It's. It's one thing to say you can't look into all the evidence. It's another thing. I think most of us. I don't think anybody bought that text exchange between the lovers. Right. And so where did that come from? Where is this key witness? How did you then vet this key witness, lance twigs, from 11pm at night to 7am the next day. You had gone through all their computers. You were totally sure that he had nothing to do with it. Who believes that?

[Colonel Don Davis]

Right.

[Natalie Morris]

These, these are unbelievable postures that they're setting forth and asking us to buy. So it makes sense that there would still be some adults in the room saying, this is not it.

[Jesse Merle]

Yeah. I don't know if you guys have seen the coverage that I had earlier the week, but we did a. Myself and my guy who does a lot of the investigations for me we found. Are you. I don't know if you guys are familiar with Sky Valdez, who was a very early suspect because they had. They're a. A transgender member of the Utah Armed Queers or whatever, and they had posted a song to their soundcloud, like, the second week of August, called Charlie Kirk, dead at 31. They also had a, like a, like a painting or a drawing that they had made posted to their Instagram the same day of a shooter in a prone position on a roof with a mountainous backdrop that is absolutely identical to the one at Utah Valley. And the title of the. Of the. Of the drawing is Roof. And we found a direct connection between Sky Valdez and Lance Twiggs through their. Through not Discord, but through their Steam account where they talk to other gamers. And so you're like, okay, the. The feds just. Oh, you guys felt comfortable just clearing Lance Twigs. He doesn't know anything about this. But. But we can look into this and find clear foreknowledge, clear motive. Clearly has to have had some kind of involvement over here. And we connected them to Lance Twigs, who the governor went on national television, was like, this is a great actor. He had no idea what's going on. And the evidence is this incredibly ridiculous manufactured text, you know, text thread that is so obvious to not be genuine. I mean, like, your. Your best case scenario of that text interaction is Tyler trying to shield Lance from prosecution. That's. That's like your. That's the most generous version of what that could be, as far as I'm.

[Clayton Morris]

Concerned, and most transparent administration in history. Right?

[Philip]

Like.

[Clayton Morris]

Right what? Like, President Trump ran on that most transparent administration in history. So you literally have his head of intelligence and Joe Kent specifically saying, we want to investigate this. There's something there. We need to investigate this. What's wrong with investigating something? Maybe it points to Ukraine. Maybe we know that there were AZOV members literally there on January 6th at the January 6th riot or insurrection. You were like, where is this foreign money? Are there actors that were paid by the CIA? We want to know. We want a clean house on this. Why is it, you know, we also.

[Natalie Morris]

Want a government that never looks away?

[Clayton Morris]

Right, Right, exactly. We wanna shine a light on this, even if it makes us uncomfortable. And so, I mean, President Trump could step in here and say, hey, guys, enough of this bs. Stop this infighting. I want a full investigation of my friend Charlie Kirk, who helped me get elected.

[Jesse Merle]

Yeah, I mean, my theory on this. I did a video about this last week, and my theory on all of the. All of the Epstein stuff, as well as any of this kind of shielding Israel from any kind of speculation. And I'm not saying that they're involved, by the way. I'm not saying they're involved at all. But my theory on the Epstein stuff and all of this is you've got Jared Kushner over there doing this $50 billion reconstruction in Gaza, and If anyone thinks that Trump is not, you know, he's not negotiating on behalf of Trump, I mean, this is going to be one of the biggest. This is probably going to be one of the biggest deals that's ever been done, ever. You know, when Biden was in office, he's got this Mickey Mouse operation where he's got Hunter Biden going around picking up, you know, cash or, you know, putting him on a board of a Ukrainian energy company. It's like Mickey Mouse corruption. And at the same time, now the Trump guy, these guys know how to do business. You know, you elect a businessperson to become president, and they are going to have gigantic opportunities to make tremendous, unfathomable money. And if you look at that Gaza deal, you have. You have Kushner and Trump, you have the Saudis, you have Israel, and then you have Peter Thiel, and you have Elon. And so, I mean, they're literally going to rebuild this area. They want to build Singapore, they want to build Dubai, you know, and it's like that, that amount of money, because I never believed that Trump would take a back step. When they're like, oh, you know, they must have compromising information on Trump. I'm like, Trump would tell them to go F themselves if they tried to lean on him. That way, he would not break. But you put. You put like, Rockefeller level money and status in front of Trump, and now you got something he's going to be motivated by. That's. That's been my theory on why, you know, there seems to be funny business going on there. Personally. That's my thoughts.

[Clayton Morris]

What do you guys.

[Natalie Morris]

Would that explain why he would call Epstein a Democratic hoax?

[Jesse Merle]

Yeah, I mean, maybe if they're. Because, you know, it's.

[Phil]

If.

[Jesse Merle]

Think about it like this. If they actually release the Epstein files, who gets hurt? You know, whoever. Whoever is in possession of the compromising information on the most powerful people in the world. Because that leverage, it basically takes the power that those people wield, and it makes it the power of the owner of those. Of the compromising information. So if they start exposing people, every time they do that, whoever has the compromise is the one who actually loses. And so I could certainly see, you know, if they're in this big deal, they're like, we just need you to kill this Epstein thing. You know, and it's. I mean, if you're talking about. I mean, I can't even imagine how much money you're talking about in this deal.

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah, but it's not killed just today. Prince Andrew's Losing his titles. So that if Epstein had no clients.

[Jesse Merle]

Yeah, no, no, no. Oh, no. Epstein had plenty of clients. I'm talking about, like, the administration's attempt to try to minimize who gets exposed by this thing.

[Professor Simon Holland]

And.

[Jesse Merle]

Yeah, and I always thought Prince Andrew was such a. Such a common sense, you know, kind of thing to throw to, like, the wolves. It's like, well, we got to give him someone. You know, we got to give the people someone. And, you know, Prince Andrew is not an actual person who wields a lot of power. He's a. He's a royal. You know, so they're like, here, give. You know, give up Prince Andrew as opposed to, like, Bill Gates.

[Philip]

Yeah.

[Jesse Merle]

Someone who has real power, and they want to keep control of those guys, at least. That's, you know, I mean, this is all theoretical. I have no proof of any of this. You know.

[Phil]

Can I chime in real quick? Yeah, yeah. I. I just want to say, like. Like, people tend to focus so much when they're talking about Epstein on, like, the child sex trafficking, and I don't think that's what they're trying so hard to hide and keep hidden. It's the financial crimes. That's what I think they're scrambling around to cover up. I don't think they care about the child trafficking, to be honest. I think it's the financial crimes is what you've got. All these people in power are trying to hide. They're trying to bury that.

[Jesse Merle]

Totally possible.

[Clayton Morris]

Can I ask you this, Jesse, which is the thing that bothers me here on this fight? If we go back to the original reporting on this, if Kash Patel, who's a domestic law enforcement. A domestic federal law enforcement agency, not supposed to be in the intelligence.

[Philip]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

Not supposed to be involved in foreign intelligence at all. That's where the CIA steps in, and that's where Tulsi Gabbard. That's where. So why the hell is Cash Patel. Would he be inserting himself in this anyway? If they want to investigate from a foreign perspective, like, he's shutting that down. What balls does he have to do that?

[Jesse Merle]

And imagine if a foreign power really did plan, fund, and execute this and they assassinated Trump's number one. I don't know, Captain of his organization, in terms of recruiting the young people, whatever. Charlie Kirk was an incredibly valuable asset to the Trump administration.

[Natalie Morris]

He was a generational ambassador. Right.

[Jesse Merle]

If a foreign adversary actually pulled this off, the level of brazenness that that would take and how. How overt and crazy an attack that would be, like Wouldn't you want to make sure that China didn't do this, Israel didn't do this, Russia didn't do this, Ukraine didn't do this, or some other. Some other actor? I mean, like, it seems like, you know, making sure that a foreign country did not do this should be of the utmost importance to everyone.

[Natalie Morris]

Oh, I believe we are going to hear soon that Russia or Iran did.

[Jesse Merle]

It say to them about why he wouldn't want them to look.

[H]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

Or you don't want to look more.

[Philip]

Deeply to realize that our own CIA with these other intelligence agencies was directly involved.

[Clayton Morris]

As Colonel Towner Watkins points out, you know, like, it all leads back to MI6, the CIA, and Mossad. And so, you know, we're all just.

[Philip]

Like pawns on their chessboard right now.

[Clayton Morris]

Jesse, great to see you. Thank you so much. And keep up the great work. I encourage everyone to check out the Jesse on Fire show over there.

[Philip]

Great friend.

[Clayton Morris]

Great to have you here on the show, Jesse.

[Jesse Merle]

Thank you guys very much. I appreciate it.

[Philip]

Appreciate it. Thank you so much.

[Colonel Don Davis]

All right.

[Natalie Morris]

That's very perplexing, Clayton. Yeah, I'm very annoyed.

[Clayton Morris]

Well, it's like, you know, the FBI tries to masquerade or Cash Patel, the current FBI, tries to masquerade as an intelligence operation. So if they are running cover for the CIA and they're like, don't look any further. Like, forget the foreign part of this. It's like, don't look any further because you'll find the CIA's hands all over this thing.

[Natalie Morris]

And if it's a slam dunk case against Tyler Robinson, they should not be worried. There's. Yeah, it should have been right. If they have the evidence, which they clearly do not. All right, coming up, we're gonna talk about nuclear war between China, Russia, and us, the United States. That sounds fun. Is who's provoking who here? We're gonna talk to Colonel Don Davis about that. Second. But first, we want to tell you about our friends over at Comet AI. Now, Perplexity AI is the company that makes Comet AI. They are a fantastic way to have AI in your browser in a more secure way. So you think about. You go around the web and you do one task at a time. And then sometimes you ask maybe an AI client to help you with things. Well, you can have that in your browser if you're using a Comet browser. So the way it works is that you download a brand new browser, you're using a new secure browser, you ask it to help you with things. Reservations, travel reservations. And it will help integrate these things into your life. Uh, for instance, you might get curious about something and you're looking it up. I for one have Instagram constantly recommending that blow dryer iron thing. Do you guys know what this is? The Aeronaux? I'm trying to figure out whether it works or not. And everywhere I go is a paid sponsorship. Uh, but if you use an AI browser like Comet, it can help tell you these are all paid sponsorship. These are not actually real reviews which you cannot find just yet. And so have an AI helper follow you around the web rather than just decide to use it one off at a time. So we want you to download it right now. Check it out. Download Perplexity's new AI web browser called Comet. Go to PPLX AI Redacted. This really is the future of web browsing. Not just, just sort of one off web usage, but real, true integrated AI helpers. That's safe and secure. So go to pplx AI Redacted right now. You'll get a month of Rumble premium for free when you use them. PPLX AI/ redacted. Well, President Putin announced the successful test of a nuclear capable underwater drone called Poseidon. This is an autonomous weapon system described as being able to launch from a submarine and unleash radioactive tsunamis they say to devastate coastal cities. Okay, President Trump responded to Putin's announcement by basically saying we can do that too. Here's his truth. Social like, I hate to do it, but I will do it. You know that meme A plus is what he's giving himself that we can do this too, because other countries are doing it. Then I've instructed the Department of War to start doing it. Okay, The Kremlin responded to this by saying, go ahead and try. If you break your nuclear agreements, we will too. So who is provoking who? Here joining us to discuss is Colonel Don Davis. Dan Davis from the great YouTube show the Deep Dive. Thank you so much for joining us.

[Colonel Don Davis]

Always a pleasure to be here. Thanks for having me, Natalie.

[Natalie Morris]

All right, so who is poking who in this instance, do you think?

[Colonel Don Davis]

Well, I mean, you have to look at first of all this is you have to go all the way back to George Bush, where the first Polk, I guess actually started when we got out of the Anti Ballistic Missile Treaty, the ABM tree that was the genesis of the starting of the Buddha Vestnik missile, the one that is that you talked about the Poseidon under the water. But there's also the one that's basically a nuclear fueled Nuclear powered missile that can literally fly anywhere in the world and basically stay aloft as long as they want it to. There's no actual limitation on how far it can fly. That one was started because the, we got out of the ABM treaty, so they started developing missiles from that, the Reshnik, which also can be nuclear tipped, which was shown I guess last year. That was because of we got out of the INF treaty. And so now then we have these missiles being developed because the US got out of these agreements earlier. So now that we have the situation where, why now? Because you have the issue where, you know, the United States just put this new sanctions on Russia, the Europe is continuing to put pressure, always trying to put pressure on Russia and providing long range weapons, et cetera, in their war with Ukraine. So this seems to be Russia saying, hey, you under, you gotta understand there are some red lines that exist here and here's some new ones. Now the reality of it is there's already a nuclear triad in both the US and the Russian side. And those things already have the ability to destroy the world over 10 times. Whatever the number is, it doesn't even matter once it's beyond one. So this doesn't add anything to that. But what it does do is it just provokes that says hey, here's something new and I'm kind of in your face. And then it's going to prompt the US to say and President Trump specifically that, oh yeah, like that true social had there, I can do that too. And so now I'm going to do it. And the problem is that that doesn't ramp things down. I think Russia's probably intent was that this would show that hey, it's stupid to keep pushing against this bear right here and to even go up to the edge to find out where the red line is and that'll make the west want to come down. But it's unfortunately it's going to have the opposite effect. It's going to make them ramp it up more and then you have the issue was, well then with Russia, ramp it back up. One other issue on there. It's unclear what President Trump meant when he said we're going to test nuclear stuff too, because. Are you talking about make an actual nuclear test, a nuclear weapons test, like detonate a nuclear warhead to make sure they work? Are you talking about what the Russians did, which is a new class of missile or a new class of underwater drone? I'm not sure we have one to test. So it's unclear what President Trump might mean on that we already have plenty of tests that are routine on our existing arsenal to make sure that those missile platforms will fly and operate the way they're supposed to, et cetera. So that wouldn't be new. So it's unclear what exactly President Trump means when he says we're going to do nuclear testing to the same kind of things because we don't have those platforms. So bottom line is anytime you start talking about, you know, oh, yeah, with nuclear one upsmanship, that's a bad thing.

[Professor Simon Holland]

For the planet, right?

[Clayton Morris]

No, I think it's like we've gotten so far afield from, hey, like, nuclear test ban treaties and like, it's all like, let's tamp this down. The rhetoric has been exploding over the past couple of years and it's gotten really out of hand. I think Moon of Alabama did a great job pointing out that, hey, what did Trump mean by this by saying, hey, is he talking about a nuclear delivery vehicle here or is he talking about a nuclear warhead here? The Washington Post seems to think that it was him talking about nuclear warheads. But is it some sort of a new, some sort of a hypersonic missile or something that we haven't seen? Because as you just pointed out, Russia just rolled out, I think last week, some new missile that can, I mean, go hypersonic, that can like hover in the air and wait and take direction of, like, where it needs to go next, remove, like move itself and then strike a target. So it's not just being launched and then done. It's like, oh, I'm waiting for your. You have an on the field battlefield move.

[Colonel Don Davis]

It's actually subsonic. And that's part of the interesting thing about it because it can be maneuverable. So it's not, you know, a hypersonic like the Oreshnik, for example, which can just blast so fast that you can't have countermeasures to it. This one, it's not too unlike our Tomahawk cruise missiles, except that because it has a nuclear power pack on it, it has virtually unlimited range. It can stay aloft as long as they want it to, as long as the components continue to function. You know, like an aircraft carrier, a nuclear powered aircraft carrier which can go decades without having to refuel. It's similar to that. So it is a new capability in terms of the Russians there. But the missile itself is subsonic, but it can go anywhere. And it can come in from areas where you don't have your weapons oriented, where you're not the normal, like ballistic Trajectory of a typical icbm, for example, you know you can, you have a good place to watch those to come up, go up into space, come down. These can literally go like 20, 30 meters above the ground. They can hug mountains and go over, I mean they, this is, this is really something pretty amazing in terms of capability and I'm pretty sure that we don't have anything like that. I'm not sure what we would, would be testing.

[Philip]

I have another question, unless you had something.

[Natalie Morris]

Go ahead, go ahead.

[Clayton Morris]

So it was just reported this afternoon. Vladimir Putin has invited the press and if you saw this story, Colonel, I.

[Philip]

Want to get your take on this.

[Clayton Morris]

They have now encircled I don't know how many Ukrainian soldiers, like they've completely encircled them. And the Russians have said hey, we want to invite international press to come here and you can watch. We're going to allow them over the next, I forget the timetable, the amount of time for them to leave and surrender and walk out, otherwise they're gonna be slaughtered. We wanna invite the international press corps to come and watch this. What do you make of that? Is that, I mean propaganda? I'm sure, of course, cuz they wanna look good on the international stage, but it's a big deal.

[Colonel Don Davis]

Yeah, I'm not sure what the propaganda value is out of this one because they have the situation in hand on the front line and there's some dispute and a lot of people on the western and certainly on the pro Ukraine side are kind of pooh poohing on that because they're saying all you gotta do is look at the ground and you can see they're not all the way surrounded. Well that is true and that a lot depends on your definition of what it means to be surrounded there. Especially in the Pokrovsk area and in the Kupiansk area, both of those kind of in the center of the eastern front and up in the northern part there is a semicircle, semi cauldron around like three sides are completely surrounded on the Russian side and the very narrow opening to where anything can get in and out of there. And that means resupply, ammunition, food, water, medical support, et cetera and replacements. That's under fire control, what the Russians call fire control. So they don't physically have it controlled, but they, they have with drones and with spotters, with artillery, with glide bombs, you name it, anything that comes in there. It's just almost like a killing zone. So you effectively have the thing surrounded even if it's not a physical yet. And so that's how they have done it many times before, like in the Bakhmut, in the Avdiivka, even in portions of the Kursk offensive. The Russians had them surrounded here and they only had one exit which they had under fire control and they ended up destroying everybody in all of those locations I just mentioned. And they now have the situation replicated again in both Kupiansk and in Pokrovsk. And so the question is going to be are you just going to continue to fight until you, until everybody is killed or captured as they did in those other ones, or are you going to withdraw? What they should do is withdraw while they still have a chance so that they can save those troops because they are going to lose those two cities. There's, there's no question about that. Whether sooner or later, probably by the, I would say the crows, maybe even by the end of November and Coupian's potentially by the end of the year. It could go faster than, it could go slower than that, but it will happen. It's just methodical. They have the capacity to do it. And you know, I think that what President Putin is doing is saying we've already done this before so this is our normal modus operandi and we're offering you a chance to see that we actually mean what we say. The fact that he's allowing international people to come in and not just his own hand picked members of the media, I think is legit and I think somebody should take him up on it and so you can put to prove is it true, is it not true? Then you don't have to worry about propaganda. It's actually going to be, you can tell for yourself. And I'll be interested to see what comes out of that.

[Philip]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

Instead of creating fake stories like in Bakmut and this other propaganda that CNN and the Associated Press, the maternal hospital ran with. Yeah, you're killing women who are giving birth right now. No, not actually the truth. Look at all these dead bodies. They just left civilians in the middle of the streets.

[Philip]

Yeah, sure, right.

[Clayton Morris]

So very interesting. Colonel, great to see you as always. Host of the Colonel Davis Deep Dive Show. Great analysis as always.

[Philip]

If you want really expert analysis on all of this, you gotta follow.

[Natalie Morris]

I try to never miss it. It's good to see you.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah.

[I]

Oh great.

[Colonel Don Davis]

Thank you. Appreciate it. See you guys.

[Phil]

Colonel, thanks.

[Philip]

Colonel, as always.

[Natalie Morris]

All right, coming up we're gonna get an update on these ostriches in Canada that the, the dark side of Canada. Darth Darth Canada. Darth Canada is taking on. But first we Want to tell you about our friends at Connected Vest, because is your money working for you? Well, investing in real estate has never been easier. You probably know if you've been following the US Dollar, that savers are losers. The stock market, well, that's just basically partnering with the government to invest in the stock market. If you want to do that, I don't know why you'd come to redact it. We're not fans of the government, but we are fans of you owning your own money. Right now, you can invest in real estate short notes with as little as $500 with annualized returns of up to to 9%. You heard me right, 9%. Real estate has long been a way proven way to build wealth. But for most, the barriers are just too high to go out and buy a whole extra house or building. That's where connect invest changes the game. Because with as little as $500, you can start earning fixed monthly returns by investing in short notes, which are a collective fund of commercial and residential real estate projects. So no property management, no market swings, just steady predictable income with annualized returns of up to 9%. So here's how it works is you go to redacted.inc invest, fund your digital wallet with $500 and then select your terms 612 or 24 months and then sit back and earn monthly income through your investment. So join the thousands of investors who are doing just this. And for a limited time, when you put $500 into your account, you'll get this extra $50 bonus. So that's free bonus. So don't let your money sit in low return accounts. Take advantage Right now. Get that $50 bonus. Redacted.inc invest. Stop letting your money sit idle. Invest smarter. Build wealth with Connect Invest.

[Clayton Morris]

All right, let's talk about Canada now. And the tyranny of the Mark Carney.

[Philip]

Government shows no mercy at all.

[Clayton Morris]

It appears that the cfia, which is the terrorist agricultural department in the Mark Carney government is apparently using giant blenders now to liquefy and kill off these ostriches. And of course the owners of the universal ostrich farm are not able to get close enough to actually see how many of their ostriches are still alive. Estimates now about half of the population of ostriches are still alive because the government has been culling or killing, murdering these animals, which can live to be.

[Philip]

Well over, I think like 35 years.

[Clayton Morris]

Old or 40 years old, no threat to humans at all. In fact, maybe a savior of humans learning how to deal with Herd immunity. So here are just some examples of what these vacuum trailers and skids along with these giant blenders to liquefy.

[Philip]

Yes.

[Clayton Morris]

Large grinders to put these birds in there so that you can't see it under the darkness of night. Listen to this sound from Katie Pasitney and the Universal Ostrich Farm. Confronting the police about this watch.

[J]

We're gaining more and more affidavits from people signing things that they're hearing. And like, they say that it sounds like something's going into a grinder.

[Philip]

Yeah.

[J]

In the middle of the night. And there's a white box at the back corner. They've heard they use us many times in disposal sites where. For chickens and that. And they have some kind of chemical that they put them in first and it eats all the feathers, it eats the meat and everything, and then they're left with the bones, and they have to do something with that. So then as they go into this grinder, which everybody's saying, this is exactly what it sounds like.

[Natalie Morris]

In the morning.

[Clayton Morris]

And early in the morning, this is all happening. Let's bring in independent journalist from Ottawa, Canada, David Crayton, who writes at the.

[Philip]

Post Millennial, also hosts a great show called Crayton's Right. I want to talk about this and Mark Carney's corruption.

[Clayton Morris]

New details about a nuclear plan and deal, even as the trade agreements with the United States have fallen apart, of course. But he's going to enrich himself once again. David, great to see you. Can you walk us through? I mean, grinders. People in the chat room are like, liquefy. What the hell is happening?

[I]

It sounds like science fiction, but tomorrow is Halloween, Clayton. And I really think what's going on at this farm is in sync with Halloween. It's horrifying, it's nefarious, it's sinister, and it's all being done in the clandestine wee small hours of the morning. Now, what's going on? That one picture you showed there of one of these bird blenders, as they're colloquially known, being hauled into the farm with a truck. That was taken. Yes. That picture there, that was taken at the ostrich farm. So we know this device, which we've identified by correlating it to other devices on the market, was hauled onto the farm for what purpose? We are demanding as journalists, and the farm is demanding to know from the cfia, what is this device doing on this ostrich farm and what are you going to do with it? What are you doing? Why are these septic tanks being removed at 3:34 o'clock in the morning. Are they producing that much shit, excuse my language, from these CFI agents. Is it all that or is there something else going on here? Now, these bird blenders, as they're called, they're involved in a process called water cremation. I've never heard of this before. It's also called alkaline hydrolysis. This actually has been used by the Department of Agriculture in the United States. It's used at the CFIA plant, or shall we call it the laboratory lab in Winnipeg, Manitoba. This is the same lab, by the way, where we had two Chinese spies working on the COVID vaccine for quite some time. They were expelled from Canada. Same place, though. But here's what I think might be happening.

[Jesse Merle]

Clayton.

[I]

It seems to me that this is an experimental operation to see if these devices can be used to get rid of poultry ostriches. Potentially. They get as big as a device that can get rid of a bull cow. So this is incredible to think of it, but these devices have been in use since about 2017, and I think the CFI is considering moving to this as a widespread process. Right now they are killing poultry and other livestock through carbon monoxide poisoning. This seems to me to be an experimental option for them. Now, can we prove anything here? Absolutely not. Because you know why? The CFIA and the rcmp, which are acting in collusion together at this farm, will not allow the owners to even trespass across that fence to count the birds. Testing has been ruled out a long time ago. They can't count the birds. Now, that scene you're showing right now, this is because of observers on scene who have climbed to the top of a local mountain. They're using a zoom lens and they're capturing the entire area of the farm and they're saying, 300 and what? 330 ostriches is what the CFIA is claiming are still there, or 300. They can't decide. It's in a range between 300 and 330. How many ostriches do you see here? Well, most people are saying, looks like 200 to me, maybe tops 250. Where the hell are these ostriches disappearing? They're not flying away. This is a flightless bird. They're not getting through the fence. People can't get through the fence. Then they're not getting out of the farm because this is completely barricaded. It has CFI agents and RCMP officers watching this round the clock. So they can't get any disappearing to.

[Clayton Morris]

So they can't really get any accurate numbers then, David. Right, like. Like Katie and the team at the Universal Ostrich Farm, they can't. It's hard. I mean, you're like, looking, is that the. Is that one bird? Is that two? I can't tell. Is that the same one? We just counted it twice now. We have no idea. So they're not allowed, they're not even allowed to know about own ostriches at this point. They're being kept back from their own flock or their own herd.

[I]

There's a complete intelligence blackout. They can't determine how many ostriches are remaining, except with video like this. And the people sending this out are saying, help us count the ostriches that you can find. Go around the scene very, very, very slowly. Count as many of these black dots as you can find, See if it's anywhere near what the CFI claims. But you saw that scene. That was Karen Esperson, which is Katie's mother. She's talking to this RCMP police liaison officer and she's saying, we're hearing these weird blender noises at night, these grinding sounds. And this has been confirmed by a lot of other people who are at the farm observing. I have another video with a guy saying it sounded to me like a steak being put in a blender. And that's how he described it. But here's Katie's mom, Karen, talking to this RCMP about these sounds. He says, I don't know. I don't know. What does it sound like? Again, they refuse to release any information. They can't get across the barricade to see what's there. All we can say is put two and two together. These people have been spotted, verified, videotaped, taking this device onto the farm. It only has one use, as far as I've been able to determine in the research I've done in the last week, and that's to dispose of poultry birds. This was. This one's a little too small for a cow. They make them big enough for that purpose, but that's what these things are made for. So if the CFIA is not using it for that purpose, what the hell are they up to if not for that?

[Colonel Don Davis]

And.

[I]

And the thing is, when the Supreme Court of Canada stayed this cull, as they like to call it, this killing, they charge the CFIA to do only three things. Feed the ostriches, give them water, and make sure they have proper bedding. And if any one of them gets sick, call in a veterinarian. Well, they've been getting sick We've got one ostrich limping around the field again. CFIA has done nothing to call in a veterinarian. The CFIA is not feeding them properly. The CFI has not been giving them water, they have not got proper bedding. We've got video evidence of that. But what are these agents up to? Clearly not doing what they were told to do, which is to look after and care for these ostriches. They're obviously doing something very, very nefarious and it's going on under the COVID of darkness. What we need is to allow journalists in there with night vision photography, night vision videography, to get proper footage of what's going on here, because as soon as these septic tanks are rolling out, they can't even determine what's going on. The police literally start shining lights. And that video you showed, part of it at the latter part of that video, the people who are on site, there they go again, they're shining the lights in our eyes. They literally turn the headlights of the police cars onto the faces of those people who are watching, so they can't see anything. And they. And they take these, supposedly the porta potty refuse off the farm. But once again, this is a tall tale. There is something going on here and I'm just wondering how are they going to get away with this? Because obviously, I don't think they'd be doing this on their own. They're rogue, but they're not that rogue. They've obviously got some assurance from the Carney government that you're going to get away with this. And the family has already tried multiple times to have animal cruelty charges levied against the cfia. Do you think the RCMP is going to do that when they're complicit in this operation, when they're clearly covering up, when they're clearly acting with the CFIA in every aspect? So I've told the folks at the farm, don't hold up, don't hold your breath on criminal action. I think what you need is a civil suit to get the CFA off the ground because they have violated the terms of the agreement. And that would not be hard to prove before a judge who would. Who would order that the evidence be produced and that evidence could be produced, I think before every last ostrich vanishes for some unexplained reason, the farm needs to try another attack. They need to go after the cfia, not just criminally, but civilly. And I think that's possibly a way that they can save the remaining ostriches because if you're stupid enough to believe these ostriches are just vanishing somehow. Yeah, they're vanishing, but I don't think they're going out in thin air.

[Philip]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

They're flightless birds, so it's not exactly.

[Philip]

Like they're flying south for the winter right now.

[Clayton Morris]

David, talking about Carney here. I'll get you out of here on this. Let's talk about some revelations that you reported on about Mark Carney, the trade deal, obviously, with the United States. Not in good standing between he and President Trump, but he's still managing to enrich himself. Can you walk us through what you've discovered?

[I]

This is incredible, Clayton, because just when you think you've heard the last corruption story about Mark Carney, another one surfaces. So we learned this week that Brookfield Asset Management, for whom Mark Carney, of course, was the chairman and presumably still has immense stock in that. We don't know where his stock options are because they're all in a blind trust that is controlled by his chief of staff. So very, very convenient for Mark. So we find out this week that Brookfield Asset Management and Chemical have received an $80 billion contract to work with Westinghouse in the United states to produce $80 billion worth of nuclear reactors for the United States government. Westinghouse, as I just discovered today, is owned by Brookfield Asset Management. They bought it a couple of years back. So this is all in the family. So the question I asked the other day, we were talking about the immense corruption in this Carney government, 103 different conflicts of interest. And he refuses, of course, to release all of this information because it's in a blind trust under the guardianship of his chief of staff. So we're asking the, you know, we're asking the question, why did Mark Carney go down to his summits, his meetings with President Donald Trump, and almost get on his knees and break into Mammy? It was incredible how he, he was so obsequious and his behavior towards Donald Trump. And the first time he went down after he was elected as prime minister, he went down in May, and he said, Donald Trump is a transformational president, as he just literally almost wept. He was just so overcome with joy to see Donald Trump. The next time he went down this, this month, early this month, he called him a transformative president. Now, is there a difference between the two words? Very, very slight, but I'm guessing it's like Mark Carney was sending the signal to Donald Trump saying, thanks. Thanks for the contract, Donald. Thank you. So Much. And, you know, I'll keep coming down here and saying, you're transformative or you're transformational or you're the greatest guy. And we just love to live next door to you as long as we keep getting those contracts at Brookfield. And this, to me, was an another sorry moment in Canadian history.

[Clayton Morris]

The Mark Carney government. Everyone in our chat room agrees what a. What a corrupt.

[Philip]

What a corrupt leader you have. And that Canada is screwed.

[Clayton Morris]

Is there any chance, I mean, is there any chance of an investigation? I mean, he's running everything, so probably not, right?

[I]

The rcmp. And this is another issue right now because opposition leader Pierre Poliev has been demanding that the RCMP reopen the investigation into Justin Trudeau's multiple scandals. They refused to charge Justin Trudeau with anything. And Poliev has said, why don't you reopen these files? And of course, anybody who knows that the RCMP is now the captive of the Liberal government, of the Carney government, just as it was of the Trudeau government, should not have any illusions that the RCMP is going to start investigating Mark Carney any more than an investigated Justin Trudeau. And Mark Carney loves these photo ops standing in front of the RCMP saying that they are in solidarity together. A lot of people have said, you know, it looks a little like that German leader from the 1930s standing in front of the SS or in front of the German Wermark, because he loves these photo ops with the police, I think, because he knows the police are there for him. And this is clearly what's going on in this country. It's becoming more and more of a police state. And this is why I keep bringing people back to what's going on in Edgewood, BC, at the Universal Ostrich Farms. RCMP are more interested in terrorizing farmers on 58 acres of land than they are stopping the drug flow out of the Vancouver ports that's going out and coming in from China. They're more interested in doing this to a farm than they are stopping real criminals. It's a hell of a lot easier, Clayton, to stand around and in the Kootenays getting a little cold for them now, so they might want to draw this to a close. Maybe that's why the tempo of the operation seems to be increasing. But it's a lot easier with all of that good overtime, all of that per diem meals, and staying in hotels every day and spending $100,000 a day of the taxpayer money to keep this ridiculous operation going. One that should Never have started. And Carney seems not a bit interested in stopping.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah. Oh, it's much easier. Yeah. Be up by an ostrich farm than actually going after fentanyl. Coming into your ports in Vancouver and stopping that. David Crayton, great to see you as always. Hope you have a wonderful weekend. And prayers, of course, going out to the, to the family at the Universal Ostrich Farm there as the Carney government continues its terrorizing of them.

[Philip]

Thank you as always, David. Great to see you.

[I]

Nice to see you too, Clayton. God bless you.

[Philip]

God bless.

[Clayton Morris]

Coming up on the show, we're looking at three eye Atlas. Today is the perihelion. That means it's its closest point to the sun and this weird interstellar object. Why is NASA being so cagey about this and not releasing images, not releasing high definition images? We know they have them and we know that they took them and we know that they were taking them when it passed by Mars. So now that it's on the backside of the sun, there's a bunch of spacecraft could be, could be capturing all of this, but they're not letting us see it. We're going to speak with a professor on this who knows it all too well and what the EU could be doing about this. But first, I don't know if you saw yesterday, Jerome Powell lowered interest rates once again because of a slowing economy. Ray Dalio says we are sitting on a massive bubble and there's all the signs of a bubble about to burst. I don't know if you saw Chipotle news yesterday. Chipotle shares plummeting because Chipotle announcing, hey, people just don't have money. People don't have money to go out and spend right now on a $20 burrito. Imagine that. Imagine when everything was going on during inflation, they like jacked up their prices and people went along, I guess went along with it for a little while. They saw some record profits. But no, we are in, we are seeing some really big warning signs right now of a pullback from consumers and of course, a collapsing US Dollar. And anytime the Fed gets involved and starts to lower interest rates, that devalues the US Dollar once again. That's why. And I don't know if you saw gold prices surging again today. It dropped. It had a little bit of a setback, A reset dropped below $4,000, but then surged once again back over $4,000. I mean, think about two years ago. We were talking $1,800 for an ounce of gold. We were talking 25, $27 for an ounce of silver. Now upwards of $50 for silver. That's why we're such big proponents in owning real tangible things that the government can't, you know, take away from you or manipulate your money. Your currency, fiat currency, every fiat currency.

[Philip]

In world history has collapsed, every one of them. What makes you think the US dollar.

[Clayton Morris]

Will be any different? You see what's happening in Europe. They want to take away your cash, move you to an all digital future.

[Philip]

That's exactly what's happening there.

[Clayton Morris]

We lived in Europe, we know exactly.

[Philip]

What they were doing.

[Clayton Morris]

So that's why we're big advocates of owning gold and silver. Owning tangible precious metals in your portfolio now, whether you keep it at your house and your gun safe or you, you're holding it off site in a.

[Philip]

Secure off site facility.

[Clayton Morris]

Our friends at Lear Capital can help you do that. They're an American company, they're fantastic. I would just encourage you to get on the phone with them and have a phone call. There's no pressure at all. In fact, they'll send you a free gold kit so you can sit with your spouse or your partner to talk about and go over it and decide, hey, do I want to start investing.

[Philip]

A portion of my US dollars, which.

[Clayton Morris]

Are losing value every day, into something that's not losing value every day, which is really wealth preservation at this point. Like it's, I always say it's great that gold has gone up and doubled in price. That's one wonderful. You know, I bought it back when it was like seventeen hundred dollars an ounce. That's wonderful that it surged over four thousand. But for me it's about protecting my family and it's wealth preservation.

[Philip]

It's making sure that your family's future.

[Clayton Morris]

Is secure if it's not tied to a government currency.

[Philip]

So like I said, it's great that.

[Clayton Morris]

It'S gone up and it's great that it continues to go up. Wonderful. But that's not why I own it. I own it as a hedge against inflation and I own it as a hedge against these governments which are corrupt, as you know. So go to learedacted.com that's the website.

[Philip]

You can go to if you want.

[Clayton Morris]

To not talk to somebody on the phone and just get your information that way. I encourage you though, to get on the phone and call them because they're a great American company. They'll talk with you, they'll answer all your questions and just kind of walk you through the process. They have been fantastic. In fact, when we first started working with them. We worked with them before we even had them on the show. We called them blindly. They didn't know who we were. And they just took the incredible customer service care. Natalie spent time talking with them. They had no idea who we were. That's the kind of company they are. 1-800-613-3557 to get your free gold guide right now. Again, 1-800-613-35 57. Start learning how to invest in precious metals today.

[Philip]

Start protecting your family.

[Clayton Morris]

Please, please heed the call. Well, today is the day, folks. Perihelion for 3i Atlas, as it's called. It's the weird interstellar object that heading our way. Perihelion is at its closest point to the sun. That's what that means. Now, to be clear, this object will be behind the sun to, to my understanding, you know, but I'm not, I'm no astronomer. So that we won't be able to see it, but there are plenty of spacecraft that will be able to see it and we'll be able to get images of it and all of it. But why is NASA refusing to allow us to see these high definitions, definition images? Why is NASA being so cagey about this thing? It's very bizarre. What is it? Is it just a comet or is it some interstellar spacecraft? We don't know. Who knows? We don't. Why is NASA hiding all of this? We want to bring in Professor Simon Holland now, who's far more educated on this than I am. And Professor, I want you to treat.

[Philip]

Me like I'm a fifth grader today.

[Clayton Morris]

And because, you know, I hate all these people that pretend to know everything. I don't know everything about this at all. But I want you to educate us. So today is perihelion. First, can you talk about why this is so significant? Then we can get into all the why are we not seeing images and NASA and what the EU is doing to maybe get some images. But what is perihelion and why is this so important today?

[Professor Simon Holland]

Yeah, it's the closest it's gonna get to the sun. And of course, when it comes around the other side, we will be able to see it again from Earth. But you're absolutely right. There's lots of satellites out there actually orbiting the sun who are actually seeing it. Let's not forget that there's other countries with telescopes as well as the US Here in the us here in the eu, we have many satellites who are actually following it in telescopes. And it's an absolutely fascinating object. I think we can't underestimate how brilliant it is that it's come into our solar system and also how different it is. And it's this difference of its composition, of its actual elements that make it up, that's not like us. It's not like anything we have in our solar system. It's not made by our star. It's come from somewhere else. And it's behaving strangely and badly. It's not necessarily alien technology, but it's definitely extraterrestrial. And not like us, you know, it's an interstellar object.

[Clayton Morris]

But professor, when you say it's. Sorry to interrupt you. When you say it's. This is the key to me, I mean this is what's so intriguing to me and others I think, is that when you say it's behaving badly or it's behaving differently, something out of the ordinary. How exactly is it behaving that we're not used to?

[Professor Simon Holland]

Because it's made of weird stuff. I mean, we're used to. Every single comet that we that comes towards the sun is trapped by the sun's gravity, a big gravity well. And this thing is moving so fast, it's not actually going to be trapped in our solar system. It's going to whiz right past because it's not from around here. So, for example, a normal comet which is coming from our solar system made of all the stuff that you and me and everything is made of, we know how they behave. They're mainly made up of water. So when they get near the sun, they evaporate and there's a big tail coming out the back. Now this crazy guy is probably made of different elements. And for example, it had a tail coming out the front and most of the gas coming out the back is probably a cyanide gas coming out of its metal structure. So when I say it's behaving badly, it's actually just behaving weirdly. And I think a lot of people are drawing conclusions from its weirdness. It doesn't mean that it's alien alien technology. It's just alien and not like us.

[Clayton Morris]

Right, well now that makes a lot of sense. Can you talk about like some of the images now? It passed by Mars just recently and a lot of us in the United States were annoyed at NASA. I know there's a government shutdown, etc. Etc.

[Philip]

You can't release.

[Clayton Morris]

You could really, you did manage to release low res images if I'm not mistaken, but you couldn't release the High res images that we know you have access to because of the spacecraft and other observation spacecraft on Mars that passed right by Mars. Can you talk about this?

[Professor Simon Holland]

Yeah, I can. It was terrible. I mean I was absolutely shocked. There was my little fingers going not to the NASA but directly to jet Propulsion Lab JPL who are actually controlling satellites going round Mars. And we were expecting for a very close up, high resolution image. The US in that case have much higher resolution cameras aboard their spacecraft than there's Chinese and EU satellites around Mars as well. But they were much lower resolution and they were the only ones that were released. And to this day NASA through JPL have not released the high resolution pictures. It does seem really strange. I know you've got this kind of close down of the government, but, but come on, non government organizations, universities and people should be able to be free from this and we should be able to get the actual images. I'm shocked because that was a fantastic opportunity to get very close to this thing and actually find out what it's made of and its size and how it's moving and its shape. But no, we're missing that. We're slightly struggling to get high resolution pictures and I find that very disappointing.

[Clayton Morris]

Professor, in the eu, I know you guys are, well, you're not in the middle of a government shutdown. The EU has other major problems, totally separate from our mess that we've got here. But what are you guys doing differently to try to get some of these images of this that the United States is not being forthright with right now.

[Professor Simon Holland]

Just using EU assets? I mean, I think it's very disappointing. I mean the astrophysics community is the one community in science that needs to and does share images and data. You know, other, other bits of science might keep it to their own country, but if you see something up there, you need to share it with Australia. You know, you have to actually share astronomical data. And it's very disappointing that we're not getting probably some of the best assets from the United States that has seen it, especially on the Mars satellites. Yeah, I mean the EU doesn't really have that kind of high resolution camera stuff, but there's a lot of other people looking at it. I just heard today that it's now visible and it's been resolved by radar. This is not a picture, but actually made a three dimensional radar image of it. It's spherical, it's moving incredibly fast. The amount of energy it has is incredible. I'm so pleased that it didn't hit anything. I was very concerned that when it went between Jupiter and Mars is where all our asteroids are. And it could have played a game of billiards with things. If it hit anything, it would have upset the apple cart because of its speed.

[Clayton Morris]

How big are we talking here? Because I think a lot of people, they've been sharing images of it looking sort of like Oumuamua, which is like a long cylinder almost, but this is spherical. How big is this sphere.

[Professor Simon Holland]

There is? I can't remember the exact size, but I do know the one statistic is it's bigger than both Oumuamua and Borisov. The other interstellar object, you know, we've seen three. This is why it's 3i Atlas. And it's very heavy, very big. Somebody's worked out the actual mass. I don't have it in my head right now, but it's much bigger than the other two. And I think it is spherical. You're absolutely right.

[Clayton Morris]

So we're talking, are we talking asteroid size here? Are we talking, you know, moon, moon size?

[Professor Simon Holland]

Oh, no, large asteroid size. But that's brilliant that you raised that because it was actually my friends at Hawaii, at the university who run the Atlas project and why it's called 3i Atlas, is that the third object, it's interstellar and it was found by these ATLAS people. And ATLAS was funded by NASA to find, as you've just said, asteroids. Almost every asteroid over a kilometer, just under a mile in diameter has already been tracked. But the ones that are 999 meters were not tracked. So Atlas, that's their mission is to find and the smaller ones, which could still be country or city killers. And because they have this incredible way of scanning the night sky in places that other people don't look. They've got four telescopes in the northern hemisphere and two in the southern hemisphere and they can map the whole world. They do it by joining dots. Every morning they come to work, they take out all the stars which are set and look for anything that moves. And anything that moves, they can work out an orbit. And that's how they found the three eye object that was named after them, atlas. And it was incredibly good that they found it. It was right in the middle of the Milky Way where nobody else was looking, but they saw it because it was moving. And that's what's very clever about the ATLAS project. Good on them. It was very clever.

[Clayton Morris]

One thing we covered here the other day on the show, professor, is that NASA has basically launched their Earth defense Force, basically, you could call it high alert among all of these astronomers and it raised a lot of eyebrows. What is so concerning now to NASA during a government shutdown they can't give us high definition images, but they can certainly go on this, they can go on this alert to bring people an awareness about what's going on. I don't know that they think that they could stop this if it was a threat to the threat to Earth or something else large, maybe psychological operation. I don't know. What do you make of their moves recently?

[Professor Simon Holland]

I don't know. But what I do know is that the ATLAS team need to give points out of 10 whether an object is trivial or non trivial, whether it's a country killer or a city killer. And that data goes all the way, goes through to Boston to the Minor Planet center and they can work out from very little orbit data if it's going to impact Earth in the future. And then of course, if it is going to impact Earth, the two big things you can do are warn people to get out of the way. Certainly if it's a localized event, be hard for a country, but for a city could maybe. And of course now we have the possibility if we have enough time to actually divert an object by kinetic impact and actually slightly move it away, move it just a little bit 10 years before it hits Earth, it would miss Earth by miles.

[Clayton Morris]

You have a lot of great films and a lot of great videos. I've been watching you for quite a while, so I'm thrilled that you're on the show. So you said at the outset you really don't believe this is alien technology of alien origin, but you have quite a history of covering alien related technologies and Salvatore Pais and others and UFO patents and things like that, maybe from reverse engineering of craft. So if people wanted to go down that rabbit hole, what would you say to them about some of the patents that might exist about this reverse engineering of alien technology that we have in our possession? That I'm 100% certain, I would bet my life on it, that our government is using and has used and has, you know, is all these black box, black project, off the books projects.

[Professor Simon Holland]

Oh, what a fantastic question and thank you very much. Yeah. All right, so first of all, aliens and UAPS are real and they're also global. They're everywhere. There are just as much in Namibia as they are in Namibia, Nebraska. So yeah, no, many governments throughout the world have actually officially said that UFOs and non human intelligence exists here on this planet. And as you clearly say, the more information we have about them it's possible to use the weaponization of UAP is the, is the term. You know, we look at those so called five observables because those are defenses companies who are actually studying how they move. And could we match them with our technology? Have they done that? Almost definitely. I would say, I think ever Since World War II, physics, killing people with advanced physics is how we run wars. And of course we want to hit people with things that they don't know. So if we can get non human intelligence technology and actually turn it into weapon systems, your enemy won't know what hit them. The question is, what have we in the west and NATO actually got and what have our enemies got flying in the sky? It's hard to know. I mean I think a lot of the things that people see could well be human technology, which is secret. And that's what really interests. I know non human intelligence lives on this earth. People see it all the time. UAPs are real. But what have we really done to turn it into some piece of technology that we can fly around? And that's my quest. It's a good thing to try and investigate, right?

[Clayton Morris]

No, I think you're right about that. I think probably 90, maybe 95% of everything we're seeing in the night sky. That's a question questionable is our own. But that technology came from somewhere else that we've reverse engineered and now are using it for our own purposes. I've spoken to plenty of whistleblowers who've.

[Philip]

Been and witnessed this up close and.

[Clayton Morris]

Personally, who have been a part of the secret space program, who've been to the moon base. For instance, members of the United States Air Force who have been to the moon base. So yeah, people, hopefully people are waking up. I think we're.

[Colonel Don Davis]

You're dead right.

[Professor Simon Holland]

There's multiple moon bases. I mean the moon is the high frontier. Think about it. You've got something not that far away from Earth. Looking at Earth constantly. Do you think that we don't use the moon?

[Clayton Morris]

Like we wouldn't use that as the perfect observatory? Yes.

[Professor Simon Holland]

And what's also hilarious, it's perfect for lots of things. It's military observatory communication. A friend of mine was applying for a massive science foundation budget and he was openly told just last year that the budget has been closed because the US is putting WI fi and the Internet onto the moon.

[Phil]

Why?

[Professor Simon Holland]

Why would you want the Internet on the moon? I asked. There's nobody there. So we have. You can stream Netflix on the moon right now.

[Clayton Morris]

Well, I remember hearing a few Years ago, how fast the Internet was on the space shuttle, and it was like a thousand times faster than we had on Earth. Like, it's just unbelievable. So, yeah, the moon base thing is.

[Philip]

Particularly interesting to me and the individuals.

[Clayton Morris]

Who'Ve been there or the multiple moon.

[Philip]

Bases that, of course, we know about.

[Clayton Morris]

Professor, I'd love to have you back on. I know it's after 10pm there in France right now. It is. So thank you so much for staying up for us. I really appreciate it and our whole staff is thrilled that you're here.

[Philip]

So thank you so much.

[Clayton Morris]

Great to have you on the show and we look forward to talking with you again soon.

[Professor Simon Holland]

Yeah, and let's keep our eyes in the skies and watch that Three Eye Atlas.

[Philip]

Yes, absolutely.

[Clayton Morris]

And NASA, please release some HD images. We know you have them. Professor, great to see you. Thank you so much.

[Professor Simon Holland]

Pleasure.

[Phil]

Bye.

[Clayton Morris]

Thanks. Great to have him. Great to have him. Philip, any, any thoughts on that?

[Philip]

Because I know you, you've been following.

[Professor Simon Holland]

Oh, man.

[Phil]

I, Yeah, I just, I, I mean, that's his, his take on the Three Eye Atlas is pretty similar to mine. Like, I, I've not been convinced that it was, it was a craft, but I mean, it's definitely. The interstellar objects are definitely weird. So, yeah, I mean, I, I really enjoyed his take. I, I, like, I, I said in our group chat just a few minutes ago, I was like, I'm actually kind of disappointed. I, I had no idea. Like, I've not, not encountered Simon Holland before until today. And I'm like, oh, my gosh, now I have to, like, I have to go find everything he's done and watch it all. Because, yeah, that's my kind of guess.

[Clayton Morris]

You know, I know you can check out some of his stuff on Salvatore.

[Philip]

Pais and the UFO patents and the things like that that, you know, it's pretty, pretty, pretty remarkable stuff.

[Clayton Morris]

Someone in the chat room is asking, you can answer this, Philip, why call it 3i.

[Phil]

So it was the. Yes, the third. It's the. It's an interstellar object. That's what the eye is. It's the third one they found. There was a Muamu and Borkov or I can, I can never pronounce it. And then this is the third one. And then Atlas is. Because, like he said, it was the Atlas Observatory was where it was discovered. So then. Because it had gone through several names leading up to that because they kind of name things based on what they think they are. And once they realized it was an interstellar object and it Became Three Eye Atlas.

[Philip]

Right, Right.

[Clayton Morris]

Well, thanks to the professor for joining us.

[Philip]

I love talking about this and I know many of you in our audience.

[Clayton Morris]

Love hearing about it as well. So we will continue to cover it. We're going to take some of your.

[Philip]

Super chats here in just a second. Any other comments in the chat? We'll hang out and have a little chat, shall we? We got a lot of super chats today, so I will take your super.

[Clayton Morris]

Chats in a moment. But first, microplastics are infiltrating every part of our lives. Scientists estimate we now consume a credit card's worth of plastic every single week. Breathe right through our food, our water, even the air we're breathing. One study found plastic particles in a hundred percent of human lung samples. Nobody is safe from this exposure. But there is good news because I mean, even with the, like the BPA and the flates and all of this.

[Philip]

Stuff which mimics hormones and interferes with.

[Clayton Morris]

Our fertility, damages our DNA. Like, even if you eat clean packaged foods, it's still there. You can't like opt out of it. But the good thing is your gut, your gut can actually help you fight back. Kimchi Won from Bright Core nutrition is a potent ally in this toxic world. You see these studies on your screen.

[Philip]

By the way, showing you the benefits.

[Clayton Morris]

Of kimchi actually can remove this from your body. It actually goes in there and removes it from your body. That's how powerful Kimchi is. But Kimchi 1 is packed with over 900 probiotic strains unique to kimchi and proven to break down BP pa, helping you detox from the inside out. It doesn't just support digestion. It helps protect your cells, your brain, your hormones and your future. Like, a lot of people don't like the taste of actual kimchi. I do. I love it. I know Philip loves it.

[Philip]

But there's some people that are like.

[Clayton Morris]

Eh, well, that's the Beauty of Kimchi 1. You get all the benefits just in a capsule. You don't have to get a big jug of it at Costco and eat it. You can take it as part of.

[Philip]

Your daily supplements and it's really fantastic.

[Clayton Morris]

Your gut was designed to protect you, but it's being bombarded. You just have to give it the right tools.

[Philip]

And Kimchi one is fantastic.

[Clayton Morris]

I take it every day. I absolutely love it. Right now you can get 25% off with our code redacted at the link below on your screen. If you just go to mybrightcore.com redacted, you'll get 25% off if you use that code redacted. But the best part is if you just get on the phone and call them again. They're an American company. They love talking to people.

[Philip]

They love developing relationships. Imagine that.

[Clayton Morris]

It's like something out of the 1950s. You're going to develop a relationship with your customer. Yeah, we need more of that in this country. And they will do that. But they'll give you 50% off if you call them. Not just 25% off, they'll give you 50% off and free shipping. Call them at 888-404-64312. Again, 888-404-6312. Kimchi 1 from Bright Core Health starts in the gut.

[Philip]

All right, let's take some of your super chats.

[Clayton Morris]

Go ahead, Phil.

[Phil]

I definitely will be having kimchi tonight. I threw some pork in the crock pot this morning with some Goku John and some soy sauce and rice vinegar. I'm going to be having some. But I, It's. I'm almost Pavlovian. Every time I hear, like, Kim bright or bright core, I immediately think of going to eat kimchi. And I think I eat kimchi every day that we run the Bright Core.

[Clayton Morris]

At, I'm telling you. And I know, like, people be the idea of being regular, you know, we recently traveled for our kids fall break. And I'll just tell you a little, maybe it's tmi, but anytime I travel, like, yeah, I'm not as, like, regular as I'd like to be, you know, and since I've been taking kimchi one.

[Philip]

No problems. No, nothing, nothing.

[Clayton Morris]

Nothing to see here.

[Philip]

All perfect.

[Clayton Morris]

I know you were really concerned about.

[Philip]

That, but all perfect.

[Clayton Morris]

And I love it. I'm making some ribeyes tonight on the.

[Philip]

Grill, and I'm going to be serving it with some kimchi.

[Phil]

Have you tried the. The daikon radish kimchi?

[Clayton Morris]

No, I need to try this.

[Philip]

I know you speak.

[Clayton Morris]

Maybe that's. I don't think that's the one that.

[Philip]

I've been eating, but I'll have to check it out.

[Phil]

No, it's like cubes. It's like cubes of daikon radish in the, in the kimchi. It's.

[Clayton Morris]

Oh, okay. No, no, the one I have is.

[Philip]

Like slices, almost like. It's like the cabbage, you know, like the.

[Phil]

Yeah, that's just kimchi.

[H]

Yeah.

[Phil]

Just straight up.

[Philip]

Yep, straight up kimchi cabbage. I think from like, Costco or something is where I get it.

[Clayton Morris]

Let's see. Guido Sidor, says you should.

[Philip]

You should talk to Carrie Cassidy of Project Kamalo. Carrie Cassidy of Project Kamala. Okay, I'll look into that. I don't know what that is.

[Clayton Morris]

BCO says, are we still talking about Jeff Justice?

[Philip]

Oh, Jeff. Jeffrey Epstein. Yes. Thank you for your $99 super chat. Yes, we are. And we're never going to stop, by the way, just because they don't want you to.

[Clayton Morris]

Because, like, President Trump says it's a hoax or whatever.

[Philip]

We're going to keep talking about it.

[Clayton Morris]

Don't negotiate. Rodrex says don't negotiate with terrorists, but with Peto, with Pet, with PitoS, it's okay.

[Philip]

Exactly. So we negotiate with PitoS all the time in the government because most of them are pitos.

[Clayton Morris]

Pat Ann Mars is talking about wanting.

[Philip]

To close this investigation too soon.

[Clayton Morris]

What about Erica Kirk?

[Philip]

That young man? I forgive him. What?

[Clayton Morris]

Tyler hadn't even been convicted yet.

[Philip]

$20.

[Clayton Morris]

Rumble rant. A lot of people have a problem with that, you know, because what you're doing by saying that during that live memorial service was you're saying he's guilty, and now I'm absolving him. Like, you're saying to the world that he's guilty, and now I'm also saying I'm forgiving him. So you've just convicted him in a.

[Philip]

Court of public opinion. Right.

[Clayton Morris]

I know a lot of people had.

[Philip]

A problem with that, but from a.

[Clayton Morris]

Christian perspective, I get what she was trying to say at this memorial, like, let's heal.

[Philip]

Like, I don't begrudge her intentions at.

[Clayton Morris]

All in that regard.

[Philip]

But I don't know. Rod Morex says Trump said US elections are fake. $2 super chat or yes, as well. Thank you. Or your donation. Pretty much agree with that. Thank you so much. Noel says I don't believe the official story.

[Clayton Morris]

Let me just ask you guys, in the comments here, I'll even put up a poll. Maybe, David, you could put up the.

[Philip]

YouTube poll, because we can't do polls yet. On Rumble.

[Clayton Morris]

Do you believe the FBI.

[Philip]

Official story of the Charlie Kirk assassination?

[Clayton Morris]

Lone gunman Tyler Robinson, radicalized on Discord.

[Philip]

Chats as a trans lover who's now disappeared. Or disappeared a while ago, actually.

[Clayton Morris]

But do you believe the official FBI.

[Philip]

Story of the Charlie Kirk investigation?

[Clayton Morris]

And, you know, I'm not saying any one person did it. I'm not saying that any government did it. I'm not saying anything. I'm just asking questions. And by the way, there's so many inconsistencies and problems, like, how can you not want to get to the bottom of this.

[H]

Well, it shows. We already have a poll up. Should we.

[Clayton Morris]

You can cancel. Let me, let me see the result. I put a poll up earlier. Should we be investigating foreign evidence in Charlie Kirk's assassination? 6% of you said, no, we should not. 94% of you said, yes, we should.

[Philip]

Be investigating foreign evidence in the Kirk assassination.

[Clayton Morris]

I'm just curious, why would 6% of you say no, we shouldn't? Like if there's evidence. And I said specifically, she would be investigating foreign evidence. Like not, not fairy tales. I said specifically, should we be investigating foreign evidence? And 6% of you said, no, we should not.

[H]

I think we always get like a, you know, 3 to 6% of people that say no to anything we ask. Even if it's like, yeah, there should be no. I think they're either they're just trolling.

[Philip]

Or have to be trolling.

[H]

Very misinformed people out there.

[Clayton Morris]

I'm gonna end that poll, but let's ask that question then.

[Philip]

David, if you can type in that poll.

[H]

Okay.

[Philip]

Do you believe the official FBI story?

[Phil]

I feel like that's kind of like, I don't know, everything that's happened since, you know, like 9 11, basically, they've just, everything they've done since then has just eroded the. I don't believe anything any of them say. Like the burden of proof is entirely on them and they just don't care to meet it.

[Philip]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

Brekkie in our chat says, oh, I accidentally clicked no. So there, I guess there's some people.

[Philip]

That accidentally click no. So that makes sense. Some people said 6% are bots, 6% are Mossad.

[H]

Posted.

[Philip]

Do you realize someone says in our chat, do you really believe that Israel, China or Russia would do that? I mean.

[Clayton Morris]

Do you know the things that these foreign governments do? The thing is, I know too much because I've studied this at length. Just look at the USS Liberty, for instance. You want to know what foreign governments will do?

[Philip]

Look at Mao's China, for crying out loud. What will foreign governments do? Godzilla says it was solved too fast, JFK was unsolved.

[Clayton Morris]

Yet we've 75 years and we still haven't gotten a clear answer on jfk. I mean, literally. Members of Congress are calling for a reinvestigation, a reopening of the 911 attack. The 911 false flag event that led.

[Philip]

Us into a forever war.

[Clayton Morris]

Edwards, Piccarelli says Erica did not say his name.

[Philip]

Right. She's just called him a young man.

[Clayton Morris]

Right. I think she didn't say his Name.

[Philip]

That's true.

[Clayton Morris]

She probably was advised to not say his name.

[Philip]

That's a good point. Oh, April Bentley says, yeah, I accidentally clicked no on the poll.

[Clayton Morris]

So some people accidentally click no.

[Philip]

I get that.

[Clayton Morris]

Do you believe the official FBI story.

[Philip]

On the Charlie Kirk assassination? There's hundreds of you that have voted so far.

[Clayton Morris]

8% say yes. 8% of you believe the FBI.

[Philip]

That's higher than I thought it would be. Some trusting people in the audience.

[Clayton Morris]

92% say no.

[H]

Well, we also have to remember, in cases like this, not a lot of people, like, actually look beyond the official story. You know what I mean? They listen to the news, they listen to what they're saying. I mean, yeah, they're, they're here, but that doesn't necessarily mean they, they know how to do research outside of the official narratives.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, I mean, that's, that's the beauty. That's the benefit of, like, the mainstream media. Like, the mainstream media is there for that purpose. Like, just flip on CNN and get.

[Philip]

Your daily dose of propaganda. And do not, do not, whatever you do, don't look into it.

[Clayton Morris]

Okay? We don't want you to look into it. That's, that's why the mainstream media has.

[Philip]

Been so successful for so long.

[Professor Simon Holland]

Right? Yeah.

[H]

It's like, don't analyze it. Just believe it.

[Philip]

Yeah. Just believe what we're telling you here on the nightly news.

[Clayton Morris]

26 TC5 says, I don't believe anything anymore.

[H]

Well, I was talking about, like, when I was back in 2001, I was working a regular job and everything. I didn't go down rabbit holes or anything. So I believed the official story of, of, of a bunch of different things. But it was like once I went down the rabbit hole and saw one story and then started looking at everything through that same lens. Now I start with not believing and try to work my story instead of starting at the official story and trying to work my way out.

[Philip]

Right.

[H]

And almost every time, I never can get to the official story. In almost every case or anything that they talk about, I can't get there.

[Philip]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

Expression stick says flip on redacted and.

[Philip]

Get your daily dose of. He's a big fan of cnn. I don't believe anything any.

[Clayton Morris]

Because. Well, the other thing is when people call things is because they have a.

[Philip]

Certain worldview and they don't like to have that shaken. You know, they, they're.

[Clayton Morris]

There's.

[Philip]

They believe a certain narrative, and even if they. You present them with facts, you know.

[Clayton Morris]

Please don't, Please don't shake my.

[Philip]

My worldview And I think that's just really dangerous. I really think that that's dangerous to be inflexible like when you're, especially when.

[Clayton Morris]

You'Re presented with facts.

[H]

Well, that's the thing. Like when I first went down that rabbit hole, like, I didn't like the realization that I'd come to. Like, it shook every, my, the, my whole core because. Shook me to the core because I had been believing all this stuff. And then all of a sudden you realize you've been lied to. And then, and then you go start looking into things and realize you've always been lied to. It's a hard pill to swallow. It's not easy. You know, you, you will try to talk yourself out of believing it. You'll be like, no, but maybe this or maybe that. But like once you come to the realization and you finally wake up and then it's, it's, it's better because now you're informed and now you're, you know, kind of watching out for being duped again.

[Philip]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

Unbiased. Just report what is the truth.

[Philip]

Graham says. Graham Martin.

[Clayton Morris]

Captain Cruncheck says. I mean, look at the Vegas Mandalay.

[Philip]

Bay official story, the shooting there.

[Clayton Morris]

Right. Like, you'd be an idiot to believe that. I mean, and a lot of people believe, I mean, a lot of the stories we cover here on the show, the Oklahoma City bombing, I mean, all of that should now, I mean, if.

[Philip]

You believe the official, like, Oklahoma City bombing, you need to get your head examined.

[Clayton Morris]

If you believe the official story of.

[Philip]

9 11, you need to get your head examined.

[Clayton Morris]

So wait a second. You're telling me you believe the FBI.

[Philip]

Swooping into town and telling us that they've got it, they got this guy and we're done, Nothing else to see here in less than 24 hours in Charlie Kirk assassination. But you've lied to us about 9 11. You've lied to us about the Oklahoma City. You've lied to us about Mandalay Bay. You lied to us about the Florida, the Orlando nightclub shooting. You lied to us repeatedly. We're going to believe this one. Sure.

[H]

I mean, and it goes beyond that. They've been lying since the 50s about Iran. They've been, you know, overthrowing governments and lying about that. They've lied about, about Ukraine and Russia, like how that all started and the coup. And like they lied about World War II. I mean, like, where, where did they start? And, and they've been lying since the beginning.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, well, all you, I mean, you can go back to remember the Maine.

[Philip]

And the Spanish American war and the, you know, collection.

[Clayton Morris]

The collection of newspapers that were pushing us to say that Spain attacked the.

[Philip]

Maine so that we could go to war with Spain.

[Clayton Morris]

False flag.

[Philip]

And then you have the media arm of that, which then pushed that narrative on, on the American people and through the newspaper conglomerate, you know, and of.

[Clayton Morris]

Course.

[Philip]

You could go back even a little bit further than that, but that was really the height of it. That was really the main start of it, I think. Right.

[Clayton Morris]

Like, if you believe the official story.

[Philip]

Of Venezuela right now, you need to get your head examined.

[Clayton Morris]

It's just narco boats. We've got to stop their fentanyl from.

[Philip]

Coming in the U. S. Okay. Right. As someone in our chat room just pointed out. Now I lost it. Now I lost it. It was about the percentage. Oh, yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

Mr. Natural says top oil reserves in the world. Number one, Venezuela. Number two, Saudi Arabia. Number three, Iran. Number four, Iraq. Any questions about US foreign policy?

[Philip]

Exactly.

[Phil]

It'd be, It'd be a shorter list to find things they told us the truth about.

[Professor Simon Holland]

Right, right.

[Phil]

I'm trying to, I'm trying to think of one right now, and I, I can't.

[H]

I think they did tell the truth about pardoning the turkey on Thanksgiving, but the only one. Yeah, but I don't have evidence of that. So.

[Philip]

AC Says Clayton doesn't suffer fools lightly.

[Clayton Morris]

No, I, I don't mind people that are uneducated. You know, a lot of people who watch the show maybe are just like, new and don't know, like, the truth, you know, and they're busy.

[Philip]

They've got, they, they work 10 hours.

[Clayton Morris]

A day, they've got a family. They don't have time to dive into.

[Philip]

This stuff like we do. I don't mind those people because their willingness to, like, learn, like, oh, I didn't know that. Well, I need to start diving into this, you know.

[Clayton Morris]

But the people that.

[Philip]

I have a real problem with are the people who have the time and are willfully ignorant on purpose because they can't have. Or they've got some major bias that they can't upend.

[Clayton Morris]

They're a huge Trump supporter.

[Philip]

So heaven forbid we actually are critical.

[Clayton Morris]

Of Trump on this show.

[Philip]

You know, like, what does the Bible say?

[Clayton Morris]

Put your faith in men.

[Philip]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

Shouldn't be worshiping men.

[Phil]

And for me, it's also the people that, that their, their opinion on something is fact. It's like the people that come in, they're just like, like, you don't know what you're talking about. Like, that's. You're not. You know, it's like you, if you, you believe that you have an absolute truth and that, that always bothers me because you're like, you're not seeking anything because you feel like you've discovered it, you've found it and you don't need any, any more information. Like you've got it 100 and that just always drives me nuts.

[Philip]

Yeah. Money printer says yeah. The self righteous. Yeah, yeah.

[H]

I try to, I never close my mind to new information because like you know, you can think you know something and, and that's a danger. Like people plant flags and say this is absolute. I'm not moving from this no matter what information you give me. But like you have to be willing to pivot every time you get new, new information.

[Philip]

Right.

[H]

And I'm always willing to.

[Clayton Morris]

I mean there are plenty of Jews.

[Philip]

In America that absolutely can't stand Israel and have, have no allegiance whatsoever to Israel.

[Clayton Morris]

You know, but then there are people who are so blinded by their bias.

[Philip]

And their support of Israel that they can do no wrong.

[Clayton Morris]

So they can't ever think critically. They can't ever question even in the fate when you have like IDF soldiers who are whistleblowing and telling you what they're doing. Nope, can't look at it.

[Philip]

You're just an anti Semite. Okay, all right. Those are the people that I can't stand.

[Phil]

The person that commented yesterday about like, you know, Israel's not targeting children.

[Philip]

Right.

[Phil]

Like, and you know that absolute. That's not happening. Like well, I mean it is, but.

[H]

Yeah, well that's like your, your ideology is so strong that you can't like you, you can't face a hard truth like, like that. That's, I think that's the people that drive me the nuts the most are the people that are supporting Israel so strongly with their ideology that they are justifying murdering like up upwards of 20000 kids now. Like, I just, I can't wrap my head around that.

[Philip]

I don't know.

[H]

It's how you get there.

[Philip]

It's a sickness. I don't know.

[Clayton Morris]

Dachshund Nader says. Looks like I've stumbled into another paranoid conspiracy nut channel.

[Philip]

I'm not paranoid.

[Clayton Morris]

I don't know if you know, the.

[Philip]

Conspiracy theories are just six month spoiler alerts. So when we were telling everyone about COVID and the MRNA vaccines and all of the things that were happening, we.

[Clayton Morris]

Were called conspiracy nuts.

[Philip]

So thank you for that. I love being called that because we were right and we've been right on just about every topic we've covered here on this show, when people were telling.

[Clayton Morris]

Us, you guys are anti Ukraine, you're lying to people about how this war started.

[H]

Really?

[Philip]

No, we not. And we've proven that time and time again, and even the Trump administration has now acknowledged the truth of that. So thank you, though. I really appreciate it. I like being called a conspiracy nut. Yeah. Which means you're over.

[H]

It's a badge of honor now, I take that as a. Oh, it's absolutely.

[Clayton Morris]

A badge of honor. Like, you want to be, like, one of these. You want to be one of these channels that carries water for the administration. There's plenty of, like, these conservative influencer.

[Philip]

Channels out there that just want to have interviews with members of Congress, you.

[Clayton Morris]

Know who they are, and they will.

[Philip]

Never question the Trump administration's official narrative on anything because they just want to get interviews with Trump administration officials and members of Congress and they want to look like they're part of the. The Washington. You know. You know, you know who they are. You know exactly who they are. That's what you want.

[Clayton Morris]

You know where to find them if you want. The mainstream media, which is really, to me, they're in lockstep when you see.

[Philip]

These, like, conservative influencer shows that are just, you know, they just want to.

[Clayton Morris]

It's called access journalism.

[Philip]

They just want access. So they kiss ass to these people.

[Clayton Morris]

We've had members of Congress who've come on our show and we've asked them questions, and now they won't come back on our show.

[Philip]

Sorry.

[Clayton Morris]

We're going to ask you tough questions like, we're not. We don't need access journalism here on this show.

[H]

So we got 12, 28 votes, and 93% say they don't believe the FBI. And 7%. Yes. So.

[Clayton Morris]

7% of you believe the official.

[Philip]

FBI story in Charlie Kirk's assassination, and 93% do not with thousands of you voting.

[Clayton Morris]

No.

[Philip]

Claudio, you know exactly. Just give us names. You know. You know exactly. Should I subscribe to toilet paper USA after the gaslighting? Toilet paper US. Oh, TPUs. Okay. Someone says load hunter. I don't know.

[Clayton Morris]

But I just despise. I really despise access journalism. That's why when we have members of.

[Philip]

Congress on our show, I like to think that they're brave because.

[Clayton Morris]

They know.

[Philip]

What they're stepping in when they come on our show. And, you know, I really have a.

[Clayton Morris]

Problem with it because what it's saying is you can't do your job as a journalist. You can't do your job as a.

[Philip]

Show if you purport to be a.

[Clayton Morris]

Journalist when you're not going to ask.

[Philip]

Tough questions and when you just want to elevate yourself, get views and clicks.

[Clayton Morris]

And all of that. Because you can have big name guests on your show from Washington D.C. or.

[Philip]

Wherever the hell you are, you know, and I just, I can't stand that stuff.

[Clayton Morris]

I mean that's, this is exactly what the mainstream media does, by the way. I mean, I don't know if you saw like the other day. Here's a perfect example, right? Like Mike, Mike McCall or Mike McFall.

[Philip]

Whatever the hell his name is.

[H]

Mikey McCoy. What's that? Oh, sorry, I thought you were talking about tpusa.

[Philip]

No, no, no, Congressman Mike. Am I saying that right? Mike my fall.

[Clayton Morris]

Mike McCall. Anyway, he was on Caitlin Collins show.

[Philip]

The other night on CNN and was.

[Clayton Morris]

Like made a tweet about how he.

[Philip]

Was got to talk about this, this and this. We have a difference of opinions on this.

[Clayton Morris]

But I was there to like, I think he was there to like promote.

[Philip]

His new book or something, I don't know.

[Clayton Morris]

And then Kaitlin Collins like retweeted it and said it was great having you on the show and did it. Okay, so he's coming on the show, promote his book, get, you know, get promoted Caitlyn Collins from cnn and he was great having. It's all about access.

[Philip]

They just want to kiss ass. That's all it. Exactly.

[H]

Well, and the thing is like they, they let them do it. Like they let these people come on their show, they won't let them ask hard questions and then if they do, they refuse to go back. And it's like then if they do that they should be in there like doing like Max Blumenthal go to Washington and get right in their face and ask them questions, right? Because like they, they owe us answers. But these people just like, oh, you know, this, how was your weekend? Oh, you cooking with the kids. Like we don't care about that stuff.

[Philip]

That's how this stuff works though.

[Clayton Morris]

Notice why, you know, again, most of these people will only go on Fox.

[Philip]

News at this point because they're under.

[Clayton Morris]

Like a media blackout to talk to independent media, the people that help get them elected in many ways, right? Like remember Joe Rogan like asking question, tough questions. These people now they're only do Fox News interviews.

[Philip]

That's the way it goes. Runners high says Candace has 100 plus live views on because they're interested in the Charlie Kirk investigation.

[Clayton Morris]

They are.

[Philip]

And she's not going to Stop. And I think it's, I love when these people are like, she's lost her mind.

[H]

Yeah. It's like Josh Hammer did this, you know, thing, talking about it, and, and you look at Candace with I think probably upwards of 5,6 million subscribers now and hundred and some odd thousand viewers and he's got like, you know, 40,000 views. Like, people aren't paying attention to you. They're not listening to you. They're listening to Candace and Tucker.

[Philip]

Yeah. Putin said, Putin said that Tucker wanted to be a part of the CIA club. Remember that interview? I do. Jules said. Yeah, Yeah. I mean, I know Tucker very, very well. So I, I know a lot about that that we'll be discussing here. Ironically, confirmation bias is achieved by influencers in these situations. By using influencers in these situations. Now that's crazy.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah.

[Philip]

Access journalism. No, Jules, I mean, I, people, I mean, trust me, people make up stuff about him all the time. Like, I, I get it. He's not an asset. I can tell you 100. He's not an asset. You don't have an outlet on Fox not being part of the intel apparatus. Uncle Cletus, it says you don't have an outlet on Fox without being part of the intel apparatus.

[Clayton Morris]

I don't know about that part of it.

[Philip]

I mean, I can't speak to that.

[Clayton Morris]

But yeah, Claudio, I was texting Tucker.

[Philip]

The other day about coming on the show. He, he was going to come on. He, he was like. But he had a live stream that he was doing. So I'm trying to just arrange a time that'll.

[Clayton Morris]

But as far as the Fox News thing, the thing is, they want to.

[Philip]

Have these members of Congress on, on a regular basis.

[Clayton Morris]

So they're not, you're not going to.

[Philip]

See them asking tough questions. I mean, honestly, Tucker's show was one of the only shows on that network where he'd have people on and he would challenge them and actually get into debates like, call them out.

[H]

You think we'll ever see Ted Cruz sit down with Tucker again?

[Clayton Morris]

I mean, remember the interview that Tucker did with Greg Abbott?

[H]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

What the hell are you not. You have the National Guard.

[Philip]

Texas has its own National Guard. What the hell are you doing? And he couldn't answer the question. He pushed the hell out of him.

[Clayton Morris]

But if he's going to go on.

[Philip]

Hannity's show, he's just going to kiss his ass.

[Clayton Morris]

Cooper says Candace needs her vacation.

[Philip]

She might not be wrong, but it's getting weird.

[H]

Yeah, I don't agree. She had a two week break I, I, I don't agree that it's getting weird. I think she's, you know, a lot of people don't understand, like, they're like, why don't you just show what you're saying? She, she's setting traps. She's trying to give them an opportunity to come forward to say the things that they have and that they know before she releases it. Like, she's, she's playing cat and mouse with them. And I think it's brilliant.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah.

[Philip]

Danny says, did I hear about Josh Hammer calling for Tucker and Candace and Nick Fuentes to be neutralized?

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, I know. And then he's, then he posted the, the dictionary definition of neutralized, and he.

[Philip]

Conveniently left out the third definition, which was neutralized means to.

[Clayton Morris]

Kill.

[Philip]

Right?

[Clayton Morris]

To destroy or kill.

[Philip]

But he just posted the first two. I know. He's like, no, I wasn't saying anything like that. Neutralized.

[Clayton Morris]

What does that mean, neutralized? It means either. Okay. Either by force or it means, like, get the, you know, get the, like the, the massive APEC apparatus or something.

[Philip]

And, and quiet these people. They can't be talking. Have to be, have to shut them down.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, We've been trying to get Candace on.

[Philip]

She.

[Clayton Morris]

We are going to have her.

[Philip]

On, but she, she had just gone, she had just had a baby, and then she was like, basically not doing any other interviews because of that. So we're going to have her on at some point. Boston Bud says you were desalinated. Clayton. What does that mean?

[Phil]

Somebody insulted you?

[Philip]

Bout he haw says Clayton won't answer us. Weird. I am answering you. I'm reading the chat room right now. It's just hard to read. We've got like a thousand comments coming through a second. I'm not exactly sure what you're saying.

[Clayton Morris]

Lee Wine says, look into soldiers who.

[Philip]

Worked at Area 51 in and around it who are getting cancer from radiation. They were lied to about that. I would love to have them on my show. I would love to talk with them. Let's see if we can make that happen. I would love to do that. Professor, someone says, can you remind me of the professor's name that was on the show? Simon Holland. Holland. Professor Simon Holland. Bout yeehaw.

[Clayton Morris]

Said.

[Philip]

I said sorry.

[Clayton Morris]

Said sorry about what?

[Philip]

Bout yeehaw. Maybe I missed what you. But I thank you. Thank you for saying you're sorry. I don't know what, what you're sorry about.

[Clayton Morris]

You don't need to be sorry in here.

[Philip]

We're all friends. Lee Wine says my father Was one of those Air Force special security police. Oh, really? I would love to hear more about that. Grave Walker says I knew it was fake when he jumped off the roof without a gun. And I'm told to see. See an imaginary rifle.

[Clayton Morris]

Shonda says my uncle worked at Nell's.

[Philip]

Air force Base, Area 51. He died from cancer back in 1992. He was 42 years old. Redacted. Would you interview Jeffrey Prather? Look up Mud Fossil University when you get a chance. Clayton. Mud fossil. Blow your mind. Why are you laughing?

[H]

What is that?

[Phil]

I don't want to disparage other people's rabbit holes, but we'll talk later about mud fossil.

[Clayton Morris]

I was wondering if it was like.

[Philip]

If it was like, you know, oliver, Oliver, pants off.

[Clayton Morris]

You know, like.

[Philip]

And I was, like, trying to. I was trying to do the, you know, in my brain real quick. Like, the people that call into peloton.

[Clayton Morris]

Classes and they're like, hey, it's Lewis.

[Phil]

It's a bit of a mud fossil is a bit of an alternative take on.

[Colonel Don Davis]

Geology.

[Phil]

I'll say everything. Everything is a giant lizard.

[Clayton Morris]

Giant people mud fossil. I'm open to anything.

[Philip]

I'm open to anything. Transcendent, economic. Says Candace is a real soldier for Charlie Kirk. Lud, who knows, has redacted as number one on these issues.

[Clayton Morris]

You know, the other night, Tucker did.

[Philip]

An interview with Colonel McGregor, and he's, you know, they were talking about how, like, the mainstream media, no one's covering what's happening. The truth in Venezuela. Like, very few people are. And I was like, yes, yes.

[Clayton Morris]

I'm glad we are one of the few that are telling you the truth.

[Philip]

Of what's happening in Venezuela right now.

[Clayton Morris]

Don't bag this research, David. It's undeniable. Mud fossil. Mud fossil. No conspiracy, shaming.

[Phil]

That was me, Philip.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, okay.

[Phil]

That was me, Philip. And I didn't. I didn't disparage it. I just said it's an alternative take on it that I remain unconvinced about.

[Philip]

Okay.

[H]

Yeah. Because I would have thought mud fossil was a turd. So wasn't me a mud fossil.

[Clayton Morris]

They did facial analysis and teeth comparison with Bill Hicks.

[Philip]

Bill Hicks is Alex Jones. Bill Hicks the comedian, Rainbow unicorn, pony says a civil war was reigning in Jewish influence in the south and cities in the North Star Candle and window, Underground Railroad sounds. Well, there's a lot about why. If you want to look more deeply into that, about why exactly Abraham Lincoln was assassinated. You're exactly right. There's a lot. There's a lot to unpack there.

[Clayton Morris]

All right guys. Well, thank you guys for hanging out.

[Philip]

On this on this Thursday.

[Clayton Morris]

Hey, by the way, I should mention, check out our website because we've rebuilt redacted.inc it's not.com there. You can sign up for our newsletter.

[Philip]

Which is totally free, but also on the website we've got our, our new.

[Clayton Morris]

Redacted Invest section as well.

[Philip]

And because you know I'm a big time investor, I say big time like I'm like Warren Buffett or something.

[Clayton Morris]

No, but like I've long been an.

[Philip]

Investor and I try to teach people.

[Clayton Morris]

That hey, the way the government tells you to do it is incorrect, is wrong because they want you to be a part of their system so they.

[Philip]

Can make money off of you. So I try to teach you all alternative ways to do that. But if you just click on the top of our website, you'll see Redacted Invest and you can go down that.

[Clayton Morris]

Rabbit hole if you like to learn more about whether it's real estate investing.

[Philip]

Or precious metals or anything like that.

[Clayton Morris]

In there, we kind of teach you the things basically the mainstream media and.

[Philip]

The government don't want you to know about how to actually build wealth.

[Clayton Morris]

So check it out when you're over on the website.

[Philip]

We just rebuilt it, we're still working on it, but we've got a lot of great content up there for you. It's all free, so please go check it out.

[Clayton Morris]

Hopefully you can learn something from it.

[Philip]

And start to start to maybe whether it's invest in real estate or start to understand precious metals or, or how to take action with your own self directed IRA instead of what the government wants you to do, use a 401k which is a joke. All of that we try to teach you over there.

[Clayton Morris]

So thank you guys for hanging out on this Thursday. We'll be back on Monday at 4pm Eastern Time. We're live Monday through Thursday. By the way, let me know in the chat room how many of you are new here. Just type new if you are.

[Philip]

By the way, I'd love to know. I think many of you have been.

[Clayton Morris]

Watching us for many years.

[Philip]

But hey, I'd love to see anybody on the Rumble rants, Rumble chat or.

[Clayton Morris]

On YouTube if you're new, let us know. By the way, we'll wrap up our poll.

[Philip]

Do you believe the official FBI story on the Charlie Kirk assassination? 93% of you say no with 1896 votes. 7% of you believe the FBI and their official story. Get AJ from the Y files on. Love that. All right, guys, new a lot of people new here today.

[Clayton Morris]

Well, thank you guys for subscribing.

[Philip]

We really appreciate it. Hopefully you you're subscribed to the channel and we really try to, we try.

[Clayton Morris]

To work hard for you guys to.

[Philip]

Do a great show. A really a show that you're not.

[Clayton Morris]

Going to see anywhere else.

[Philip]

You're certainly not going to see it in the mainstream media. And we are not paid for by anybody. We are not bought by big Pharma.

[Clayton Morris]

By Israel, by Qatar, by Russia, by the healthcare industry, by the bio, by the military industrial complex. We don't take money from Boeing or Northrop Grumman.

[Philip]

We're supported by the few sponsors that we have here on the show that we use personally and we're supported by you. So thank you guys so much for being a part of our community. We really appreciate it.

[Clayton Morris]

And we'll see you back here on.

[Philip]

Monday at 4pm Eastern Time. Have a great night, everyone.