← Redacted News
Redacted News
Minnesota School Shooter’s Shocking Motive Revealed – Plus Trump Targets Soros w AG Ken Paxton
01:15:29
Loading summary
Transcript189 lines
- [00:00]
A
Bubba Wallace here from 2311 Racing.
- [00:02]
B
Funny thing about being fast, you end.
- [00:05]
A
Up waiting a lot. First to show up, first in line, then just waiting. Me, I rev up Chumba casino with over 200 social casino games. No slow lanes here. Why sit around when you can spin?
- [00:18]
B
I'm already racing.
- [00:19]
A
Your turn. Play for free@chumbacasino.com. let's Chumba. Sponsored by Chumba Casino.
- [00:25]
C
No purchase necessary.
- [00:26]
A
VGW Group Void where prohibited by Law 21.
- [00:28]
C
Terms and conditions apply.
- [00:30]
D
Start the show. Don't tell me what to do.
- [00:32]
A
Welcome into the show. Welcome into Redacted. I'm Clayton Morris.
- [00:35]
D
I'm Natalie Morris.
- [00:36]
A
We've got a lot of news to get to and a lot of news that mainstream media likes to cover up on a regular basis. Anytime there's a mass shooting in the United States of America, the mainstream media loves to run cover for these, you know, these leftist activists who, with mental illness who end up shooting up churches and schools and other things like that. So we've got a lot of new details that we're going to go over today about this horrible shooting in Minnesota today and some really disturbing details from the family we're going to get to here in a little bit on the show.
- [01:06]
D
We're also going to talk about how NATO is losing badly, may even be on its last leg. That's what Colonel McGregor said yesterday. We have another great guest who's going to explain this to us in detail. So fun that our tax dollars keep funding this failing enterprise.
- [01:21]
A
Yeah.
- [01:21]
D
Also, President Trump going after George Soros for funding these rallies, violence, all of that. We're gonna talk to Ken Paxton, the AG of Texas. We're really excited to ask him about that. Also an election fraud, something that he has been keen to prosecute even though they prosecute him, persecute him. So we're gonna talk to him about that.
- [01:41]
A
Yeah, we got a lot of stuff. Very busy Wednesday for you guys, so let us know where you're joining us from around the world. I see the tens of thousands of you joining us on rumble and on YouTube and Twitch and Twitter, X whatever you wanna call it. So good to see everyone. Thank you for dialing us up today. As we kind of go through all of today on the show, we're going to get to everything we are.
- [02:00]
D
But first, first we're going to tell you about our friends over at Connect Invest, because is your money working for you? Well, investing in real estate has never been easier. Saving accounts and CDs, they offer low returns and barely keep up with inflation, the stock market, well, it's volatile. You know that. One day you're up, one day you're down. But now you can invest in real estate, short notes with as little as $500 with annualized returns up to 9%. You heard us right. Real estate, of course, has long proven way to build wealth. But for most the barriers, which is buying a whole property is just too high. It seems out of reach. Well, that's where Connect Invest changes the game. With as little as 500, you can start earning fixed monthly returns by investing in short notes, which collectively fund residential real estate and commercial real estate projects. There's no property management, no market swing, no fussing about, you know, whatever the tenants want. This will be done for you. You are a passive investor with annualized returns of up to 9. So here's how you start. You create your account at redacted.inc./invest. Fund your digital wallet with 500 or more, and select a short note, either 6, 12 or 24 months. And then you sit back and collect your returns. So join thousands of investors who are growing their wealth. And for a limited time, when you sign up and you fund your account Today, you'll get a 50 bonus in your digital wallet, giving your investment an instant boost. So don't let your money sit in a low return account. Take advantage of this special offer and start earning fixed monthly returns with as little as $500 and get that $50 bonus. So head on over to redacted.inc/invest one more time, redacted.inc invest.
- [03:46]
A
Well, here's what's happening right now in Ukraine, and it is bad news for NATO. Russian forces have pushed further into Ukraine's Dneprovsk region, marking the eighth region that they're about to take. Colonel MacGregor revealed to us yesterday on the show that Russian special forces have now entered in Odessa and they have been targeting strikes against military installations and infrastructure. If they occupy Odessa, of course, what does that mean? That means Ukraine becomes a landlocked country with no seaports. And that means Ukraine effectively ceases to be a real country. And then this Reuters revealing that NATO and Western partners are crafting military options ranging from a no fly zone to air defense systems that they're gonna be sending in. Of course, I think you have the head of the British Air Force, you have the head of the British army in Ukraine today meeting there once again, like, how many more missile systems? What else can you be throwing into this mess right now? So they have security advisors flying into Ukraine still from the NATO side. So a no fly zone over Ukraine. Yeah, that's gonna go well. That would mean NATO is officially at war with Russia, among other things. Meanwhile, right now across Europe, there's growing realization that the continent must shoulder more responsibility in this war. European leaders are saying now that they need to independently defend Ukraine and deter aggression. They can't count on the United States anymore. And then Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, says a peace agreement will likely be on the table by Christmas. Christmas? Really? We have to wait that long for peace? 40,000 people. I mean, how many more people are gonna die by Christmas time until we can get a peace agreement in place? Former CIA analyst and outspoken NATO critic and friend of the show, Larry Johnson just penned a new piece on his website, Sonar21, about how NATO is losing this war badly, but it's much worse than all of that. And Larry Johnson joins us today from Florida. Larry, great to see you. Welcome back to the show.
- [05:46]
B
Hey, good to see you. Good to see Natalie. Usually it's just you and me, so. Yeah, I'm glad you brought the better half with you today.
- [05:53]
A
Yeah, clearly. I mean, it always elevates the show when she's around. It lowers it when I'm around. Larry, great to see you. So, you know, you've been doing some incredible writing, and I want to say that I think what you've been doing, really highlighting the mainstream media is totally ignoring this. They're all in, whether it's the BBC, cnn, it doesn't really matter. But most of the European press is fully on board with like, rearming NATO, making sure that NATO has enough weapons to be able to funnel into Ukraine. Advisors have been flying into Kiev, meeting with Zelenskyy on a regular basis. And you made the point in this new piece that NATO is losing badly. Can you talk about some just on the battlefield, specifically, both military and economically here, what we're looking at from NATO's side?
- [06:38]
B
Well, we saw Donald Trump the other day tweet that the fault of Biden was that he forced the Ukrainians to always be on the defensive. Except that wasn't true. We go back to September of 2022, when the Ukrainians launched a counter offensive against Russian positions. And the Russians basically had. They had no military presence to speak of, just some border police where they were driven out of the northern part of Kherson, which is north of the Donbas. Then In June of 2023, they launched another counteroffensive. And in the process, they lost between an estimated 100 200,000 soldiers in a failed counterattack that was completely planned and directed by US Military commanders, General Cavoli, among others, sitting in Stuttgart or Wiesbaden. Then in August 2024, Ukraine again launched another offensive into Kursk, and that led to the deaths of 80,000 Ukrainian soldiers. So what we've seen is this repeated pattern where Ukraine is incapable of mounting successful offensives and holding that territory. Russia has pushed back in every single one of those instances. And what's going on right now is the. What started off in February of 2022 with Russia having about 175,000 soldiers in their offensive into the start of the special military operation, and they were outnumbered about five to one by the Ukrainian forces. We now, three and a half years later, have seen those numbers flip. So that Russia has right now about 650,000 trained soldiers, experienced personnel that have been. That have had a minimum three to four months of training on the front lines all along the line of contact from the Sumy region in the north down to Odessa in the south. Whereas Ukraine, its army is right now estimated to be about 350 to 400,000. The lopsided losses that, you know, Western propagandists continue to lie about what Russia's experienced and ignore the true cost for Ukraine in the most recent exchange of bodies, where Russia turns over the dead Ukrainians that it has captured or taken possession of, and Ukraine does the same with Russian soldiers. Russia received 19 dead Russian soldiers. Russia in turn delivered 1,000 Ukrainian. So it's a 20 to 1 ratio. For every one Russian soldier that's dying, there are 20 Ukrainian soldiers dying. And what we see taking place, the demographic changes taking place inside Ukraine are horrific. You know, what used to be a country of about 42 million people is now down to about 28 million. And they simply don't have the manpower to sustain these kinds of war losses.
- [09:48]
A
Excuse me.
- [09:49]
D
Well, just yesterday, Steve Witkoff, the envoy to the Middle east who is also negotiating this peace deal, said, well, we expect to have some kind of peace deal by the end of the year. And I felt really frustrated by that language because we continue to come here and we're, we're being breadcrumbed, like, okay, maybe this is it, maybe that's gonna happen. And we keep getting these, this posturing while you just pointed out people are dying. What do we need to happen between now and the holidays?
- [10:22]
B
Simply listen to the Russians. Listen to what they're saying. You know, in Rojes thesaurus, they're going to enter a new synonym for the Term sycophant, Witkoff. I mean, you know, the kind of sucking up that he does to Donald Trump is just really disgusting and it's embarrassing. Well, the Russians have been very clear what their conditions are. Vladimir Putin laid it out on June 14, 2024. It's been repeated ad nauseam by Sergei Lavrov, the Foreign Minister, by Maria Zakharova, the spokeswoman for the Foreign Ministry, by Dmitry Peskov, the spokesman for Vladimir Putin, Medvedev, the former president of Russia. And right now, Russia has said, look, the people in Crimea and Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk and Luhansk voted to join Russia. The people in Crimea did it in 2015 or in 2014. I take that back. And the people in the other four Oblasts did it in September 2022. They've all voted to become part of the Russian Federation. They are now, through the vote of the legislature in Russia, the Duma, they are now officially part of the Russian Federation. So those, those states are not going to be returned to Ukraine in any form, fashion. There's no land deal, there's no offer to, we'll give you this for that. None of that's going to happen because it is legally part of Russia in the same sense that, that Donald Trump couldn't show up in Alaska and say, hey, Vladimir, I'll give you Alaska in exchange for giving back the Donbass. Not going to happen. That's number one. Number two, that there is absolutely no more NATO activity inside Ukraine and Ukraine is never going to be part of NATO. Now, these are two demands that Russia will not compromise on. And the west, the notion that the west is going to send peacekeeping forces into Ukraine is a suicide mission. The Russians will kill them. They will view, they view that as a threat. They're already, Russia's already facing two Aegis batteries, one in Romania, one in Poland. The Aegis missile system normally is on a destroyer, but this time they took them off the ships, installed them on land. And the problem with them is that they are capable of firing a Tomahawk cruise missile which can carry a nuclear warhead. So essentially, Russia is now looking at having nuclear capable warheads on its border. One in Poland, one in Romania. That's what Russia is trying to get rid of, trying to disarm, push it back in the same way that we would react very strongly if Russia decided to deploy nuclear missiles to Venezuela, Mexico or Cuba. We wouldn't tolerate that for a minute either. But, you know, we seem to think we can get away with this. So there's not going to be a negotiated peace deal by December. Ain't going to happen.
- [13:38]
A
I'll get you out of here on this, Larry. About the tariffs, President Trump in the Cabinet meeting yesterday said, you know, Zelenskyy's not been a good guy either. You know, he plays that game. And then he said, you know, willing to put tariffs against Ukraine in order to get them back to the table and make sure that they're, they're involved in this peace process. Would tariffs work against Ukraine? As you pointed out, the population is down to 28 million. They're massively indebted to the IMF. The country is on its last legs as it stands. What would tariffs do?
- [14:11]
B
Nothing. I mean, the United Donald Trump has it fully in his power. All he has to do is stop sending them money, stop sending them weapons, withdraw the CIA and military advisors that are in country, and also tell Zelensky that he's not going to have a visa to the United States to enjoy his property in Vero Beach. The whole notion that Trump has any leverage with using tariffs or sanctions against Russia, which he's also threatened to do, it's just laughable. What we've learned in the course of the last week, and this is why I wrote the article about NATO, is losing against brics dramatically. All of the major countries in NATO that are the major economies have a debt to GDP ratio of at least 100% or greater. What that means is every day, if you make $100, but you're spending $125, that means you're $25 in the hole. Now, do that every day. Well, the next day you're $50 in the hole. Next day you're 75. Next day you're 100. And then it keeps growing. That's the United States. We're 125 to 100 to 1. 100 death. Debt to GDP ratio. England is a little over 100 to 100. You know, it's, you know, one to one. France is 110. What this means is they're spending more money than they can take in, whereas there is not a single country in brics. None of the BRICS nations have a debt to GDP ratio that's lopsided. Instead, In Russia, it's 19%. So that means. Yeah, 19%.
- [15:49]
D
I had no idea that. I mean, every BRICS nation is poor or every NATO nation is poor.
- [15:55]
A
Yes, yes and no.
- [15:57]
D
BRICS nations are.
- [15:59]
B
No. Yeah, it is. And the other, the other aspect to it is when you look at the economic growth right now, the average economic growth for BRICS, all the BRICS countries combined, 3.6, 3.7%. For NATO, about 1.2%. So, you know, here's NATO making all these big promises about, boy, we're going to spend all this money and we're going to pay for these weapons. And they're broken. The United Kingdom and France are both talking about having to go to the IMF for bailout loans because they are in such desperate economic straits. Not a single BRICS country is in the same position. So, and then just went over there, sort of interesting tariff note on, you know, four key examples. One, U.S. shipments of propane to China at zero, they've dropped off the table in 2025. It used to be a $4 billion industry. U.S. soybeans, which used to be, we were a major supplier to China. China's cut that off. It's now buying from Brazil coffee, the coffee that the United States imports from Brazil. It's going to cost us a lot more because Brazil selling it all to China now. And then yesterday you heard Donald Trump talking about, oh, we're going to have 600,000 visas for all these Chinese students to come back. Gee, why are they doing that? Because the number of American colleges that depended upon Chinese students who paid full freight coming into the country, they're not coming anymore. And Trump has hit too late. What he was, he was reacting to pressure he's received from all these US Collegiate and universal colleges and universities. So the whole tariff thing is backfiring on Trump, and then India has just told Trump to go pound sand that, no, we're not going to stop buying Russian oil, we're going to buy more. So this, you know, the Trump foreign policy on this is just becoming a disaster.
- [18:01]
D
Well, in fact, I looked this up because recently BRICS had a conference and said that BRICS countries are responsible for upwards of 45% of global GDP.
- [18:14]
B
Correct.
- [18:14]
D
But when you compare that to NATO countries, it's 30% or less. So it's clear who the heavy hitters are here and it's not us. And unless we realize that and start playing nice with others, we're gonna continue to circle the drain. Is that the point that you're making?
- [18:31]
B
Absolutely. You know, we, you know, we. Trump has embarked on a policy of bullying and threatening, and other countries are reacting to that as you would, you know, you and Clayton wouldn't have friends that are constantly calling you names, threatening you, threatening your family, hey, I'm going to break you. I'm going to bankrupt and then, hey, let's get together for dinner.
- [18:55]
C
What?
- [18:57]
B
You owe me an apology, for starters. So, you know, we've threatened India, we threatened China, we threatened Brazil, we even threatened Switzerland. You know, I had an interview with a former member. He's a Swiss citizen, but he's a member of the German army. And he was saying, you know, he said here, Swiss thought, we know we were in pretty good shape with the United States. And Trump's hitting us with tariffs. So it is, it is driving a wedge with other countries that should be our allies, should be our friends, but instead they're turning to brics because BRICS doesn't bully.
- [19:35]
A
Yeah. I've been watching this BRICS disaster unfold for a couple of years now, and it's just getting worse. I encourage everyone go over to Sonar 21 and read Larry's great piece on NATO and the collapse of NATO and this rise of bricks right now. Everyone should be paying attention to this. I really sincerely hope people pay attention to it. Larry, great to see you as always. Thank you so much.
- [19:56]
B
Thanks. You guys keep doing the good work. You get the word out.
- [19:59]
D
You too.
- [19:59]
A
Thanks so much, Larry. Keep doing the great writing. We appreciate it. Thanks, Larry.
- [20:03]
B
Okay, bye.
- [20:03]
A
All right, Coming up on the show, we're going to speak.
- [20:05]
D
Really great.
- [20:06]
A
Yeah, Larry's great.
- [20:07]
D
He's great.
- [20:08]
A
And he's always so level headed, too. I mean, you know, and there's very few people you can stand up and like, you know, against empire. Right. And I think that's, I love to hear from him on that. So I'm coming up, we're going to talk to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. We're going to talk a whole range of issues. But one of the big issues that just dropped this morning is George Soros. President Trump going after George Soros possibly in a RICO lawsuit, or at least that's what he's hoping will happen against George Soros and his son for promulgating these protests, these violent protests across the country. Every time you see one of these protests, there's always a Soros name that seems to be attached to it. So we're going to talk with the attorney general about that and redistricting as well. We're going to be talking about, of.
- [20:51]
D
Course, and mail in ballots, something that he has told us for years are full of fraud. So we're excited to ask him, what can you do now? Because under the Biden administration, he could not prosecute that. He can he now will we have safe elections ever? So this is the exciting topic you guys. Exciting.
- [21:08]
A
All right, so we're gonna get to him in a second. But first, you know, after a long day, you know, sometimes you are you one on the weekend, you're like, used to reach for like a beer, maybe a glass of wine, and then you feel like crap the next day. You know, I'm 48 years old now, and it just doesn't feel good anymore. Like you just when you get older, like, you don't want that. That's why I love our friends over at out of Office. The, the folks at Seoul, they make these out of Office drinks. Yes, these things are fantastic. And maybe you're happier to try out their gummies as well. But it's just the right balance of CBD and THC to kind of ease you into a nice night. No hangovers, none of that stuff. And you can choose what kind of dosages you want too. They're hemp derived THC CBD products designed to boost your mood, help you unwind. They will not give you any kind of hangover. You won't feel like garbage the next day. And look, you know, it's not something you do every day. But hey, if on the weekend you want to do this, instead of reaching for that, reaching for the alcohol, reaching for the bottle of wine, all the beer and all that kind of stuff, give them a try today. They've got their out of Office gummies as well. And a lot of our viewers enjoy these, by the way, so bring on the good vibes. Treat yourself to Sol today. Right now, Sol is offering our audience 30% off your entire order. Go to getsoul.com, use the code redacted. That's getsoul.com, promo code redacted for 30 off. You know, my friend, my friend Tucker Carlson likes to. He likes the, the nicotine pouches. So he created, you know, because that's. He's like, it puts me in a good vibe, sure. Able to focus. He used to be wildly addicted to cigarettes. Back when he and I, you know, anchored Fox and Friends. He'd sneak outside and be smoking cigarettes. He's like, I can't do that anymore.
- [22:42]
D
Are you supposed to be telling these tales?
- [22:44]
A
Well, he tells it all the time. It's not like I'm telling tales out of school. Everyone knows. And then when he was writing his books, he's like, he'd like, smoke, smoked two packs a day while he's trying to write his book and finish his book. He's like, then I went to the nicotine pouches and he felt so much better.
- [22:56]
D
Okay, so we're not sharing our vices.
- [22:58]
A
No, no, no. But I'm just saying, hey, you know, if you want to put down the alcohol and try something different. All right, we got a lot of news to get to here. Well, we've got some big legal news to get to today. First, the Trump administration just pulled off the gloves, and they are officially, it seems, going after George Soros and his son Alex Soros. It's about time. Trump said on social media today that Soros should be charged with RICO because of their support of violent protests. And of course, through his Open Society Foundation, Soros has funneled millions of dollars to get radical left judges and district attorneys all over the country into office. And of course, these radical leftist judges are the ones who refuse to prosecute criminals, and in some cases, criminal illegal aliens, just like. And avoiding ICE agents, by the way, just like Judge Hannah Dugan in Wisconsin. There she is. Take a look at her. And of course, we saw on she was just indicted because as you can see here in this video, she was basically leading criminal illegals out the back door of the courthouse to avoid the ICE agents that were just sitting right here in front of her. And she could now face up to see there, there were the federal agents there. And then the judge walks down the hallway and basically distracts them and leads them out. So for all of this and more, we wanted to bring in the great Texas Attorney General, Ken Paxton to dive into each of these stories today. We got a lot to talk about. Ken, welcome to the show. Mr. Attorney General, great to see you here finally on Redacted.
- [24:22]
C
So glad to be on your great show. I've enjoyed watching you.
- [24:25]
A
Oh, thank you so much.
- [24:27]
D
And I like the hat very much.
- [24:29]
A
Texas first. So I want to get your take. We got a lot of stuff to talk about. You've been very, very busy and doing a lot of great work down there. I want to just get your sense of this George Soros thing, because every time these protests pop up across the country, there always seems to be some sort of Open Society foundation linkage, it would appear to me, anyway, funding of these violent protests. And what do you make of Trump's push for, like, a RICO play to bring in him and his son?
- [25:00]
C
Look, I like it because George Soros has been doing this for at least a decade, inciting violence, violent mobs, violent protests. And look, we believe in the First Amendment. We believe that people should be able to protest peacefully. That's not what George Soros pushes. And there's no reason he should not be investigated and potentially prosecuted for inciting violence around our country. You can't do that in our country. That is beyond the limits of free speech and beyond the limits of the First Amendment. So I think he should at least be investigated. We ought to find out what the truth is, because we are very, we've been suspicious for years that that's exactly what's going on. And then of course, as you suggest, been spending a lot of money electing district attorneys across the country, including in the liberal cities of my state. And what that means is more crime because these guys, these prosecutors, do not prosecute many crimes that they should otherwise prosecute.
- [25:52]
A
Well, if President Trump, you know, if this doesn't move forward at the federal level, could you in Texas go after him? Would this be sort of the catalyst maybe that you would need in Texas to look at him individually?
- [26:03]
C
One of my great frustrations in my state, and I've been complaining about this for years, for as long as I've been Attorney General, which is 11 years, a lot of states have the ability, the Texas Attorney General has backup jurisdictions called concurrent jurisdiction with district attorneys or like in state, certain states, like I know Alaska, that, that AG actually directs the district attorneys in our state. The DA's have full authority. So in other words, they cannot prosecute or prosecute. They can commit crimes themselves and no one would prosecute them. There's no backup in Texas. I have insisted that we should have concurrent jurisdiction for the attorney General so that if DA's aren't prosecuting laws, which under certain laws, we know that's happening in Texas and that crime is rampant in certain of these big cities, we would have a backup. Right now. The legislature has not seen fit to give the jurisdiction to the attorney general, but they should, because otherwise crime is going to continue to be ramped up in these big cities in our, in our state.
- [27:00]
D
But the President is publicly calling for RICO charges. And constitutionally a president should not be ordering prosecutions. These should be separate branches of government. So you are somebody who could launch, can you at least launch your own investigations, even if you are a little bit hamstrung for prosecution? And what do you make of the President making these open calls for prosecution?
- [27:25]
C
Look, everybody has an opinion. He can give his opinion. He ultimately has. Just like I can give my opinion, I don't have the ability to prosecute. I can give you my opinion. But yeah, I mean, if we, if we had some angle that we could investigate, we'd be certainly open to doing that. We actually are investigating one of George Soros organizations right now. So we're in the process of investigating his organization and Beto's organization under our nonprofit laws, which I do have authority under, to take away charters if we believe that they are being inappropriately used or deceiving consumers about their donations. So we are in the process of investigating source. My challenge is I need district attorneys who will actually prosecute if we find criminal charges and who will actually investigate, have their own investigations and do their own prosecutions. And that's where we run into the trouble in Texas with DAs who were largely elected by Soros.
- [28:15]
A
Can you talk about that? I mean, this is unbelievable to me. So you have district attorneys where crimes are presented, and they're simply just not even prosecuting the crimes. They're letting these criminals walk free. I mean, I don't understand how they can sleep at night. This is their job, after all. I mean, this has been a huge frustration of, you know, in Texas. Can you talk about this?
- [28:34]
C
Unfortunately, I've watched the sort of iteration of how Soros has done that. I used to work with district attorneys who were Democrats in Bexar County, Nicola Hood. I used to work with Margaret or who was the district attorney in Austin, which is Travis County. And they would do their job, they would prosecute. But Soros came in and knocked out Democratic DAs who were prosecuting people because there's not a competitive primary in these liberal cities. That's all Democrats. And with his money, he was able to take out real prosecutors that were Democrats and put in prosecutors that are not prosecuting, that are doing exactly what he put in there to do, which is pretty much ignore much of the crime going on and focus on political issues rather than criminal activity. And that is affecting Texas in a very negative way. The legislature, as I said suggested, should fix that. They should give concurrent jurisdiction, have a backup plan. So if it's not happening, at least have somebody that can step in and do it. I think that best person is the attorney general. We do have that for voter fraud, and I think we should have it for other crimes.
- [29:41]
D
But all of this money that Soros puts into these causes, mostly that's allowed. So how does it shape then justice at the local level? And is there something we should do about this for further disclosure or. I mean, what you're looking into is whether or not there's incitement to something that's not allowed. But most of it, what we see is he is getting his social agenda played out through his own power of.
- [30:10]
A
The dollar yeah, Buying judges, buying district attorneys from Philadelphia all the way through.
- [30:15]
D
Texas, all across the country, that's a problem. So, you know, how are we supposed to feel about what we can do about that?
- [30:21]
C
Well, we elect representatives in Texas to the Texas House and to the Texas Senate. If people would speak out on an issue, it would become an issue for, for voters, for primary voters, particularly. Get the Republicans to stand up and not just ignore this issue, which they are ignoring. It haven't stood up to the district attorneys and I have begged them for years. But it needs to be the people that speak up. They need to be aware that this is a significant issue. I have visited our financial crime unit out in Tyler, Texas, and they've told me more and more gangs, cartels are coming into our big cities from other countries like Colombia and Romania, in China, and doing financial crimes because guess what, there's no downside, there's no risk they will not be prosecuted. And so there's going to be more financial crimes which are going to affect banks, which are going to affect cost to consumers. All of this is happening because George Soros has had the ability to elect district attorneys that won't prosecute. And the legislature has not responded in kind by allowing another officer to take that on, which I can guarantee you, if they let me do it, we could, we could definitely make an impact on these crimes.
- [31:24]
D
Oh, that's why you have a target on your back, sir, because you're willing to call out both sides, Republicans and Democrats. It's punk rock and we love it. But now we see why the media came after you. That was not a question, just a statement of fact. That's just a compliment.
- [31:42]
A
Yeah.
- [31:43]
C
Thank you. How about this? Thank you.
- [31:45]
A
There you go. Mr. Attorney General, if you would just stay there for a second, we're gonna take a quick break. We wanna come back and talk about redistricting. We want to talk about the mail in ballots and we want to talk about the other big fights that you have there in Texas right now. You just launched a massive, I think massive lawsuit and we're going to dive into that as well. So all of that and more if you just hang tight for just a second. We'll be back with the attorney general in a second. First of all, are you winging your financial future? Too many people are guessing when it comes to building wealth. No real plan, just hoping their 401k or savings account magically turns into freedom one day. I've often talked about on this show, many, many times, a 401k is really a terrible way to plan for your for your future. Even the founder of the 401k says it was never meant to stand on its own. It was meant to work in tandem with pension plans. And we know where those went down the toilet. So this is not a strategy. It's a full risk if you're just relying on that. That's why our friends at Sedera wealth are offering something powerful, a completely free custom wealth game plan. It's a one on one phone call. You just sit down with a real expert, walk away with a clear, actionable plan for your money. Whether you're just starting out or already building serious momentum, they're going to show you how to grow real wealth without Wall street whiplash, protect yourself from inflation, and finally make your money work as hard as you do. So many Americans right now, they just don't have enough money at the end of their month. No gimmicks, no pressure, just a smart, proven roadmap. Totally free. So don't wait. These slots fill up fast and a little calendar will pop up. You get to pick the time on the calendar. So head over to redacted.incwealth right now and grab your free phone call and your future self will. Thank you.
- [33:26]
D
All right. Well, we are joined today by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has been warning us that there is election fraud and he has been hamstrung by the federal government to fix it, which is one of his main jobs as the state's attorney general. In 2023, he told Tucker Carlson that he knew for sure that mail in ballots were not secure, but he was not able to prosecute during the Biden administration. Now, President Trump says he is going to end mail in voting by executive order. And oh, while he's at it, he's also going to end what he calls highly inaccurate voting machines. Now, Attorney General Paxton, you were the first person to really talk about this publicly. The Constitution does allow each state to run their own elections. But you tried to litigate other states that weren't during the Biden years and you were not, and then that put a major target on your back. So can the federal government actually fix this? And can you talk about some of the worst cases that you've seen without going into specifics in case that impinges on any of your cases right now?
- [34:30]
C
Yeah. So my argument to President Trump during his 2020 election, I suggested to him in May that he was going to lose because of mail in ballots, because we had a massive effort because of the so called Covid issue for judges, liberal judges and liberal counties to strike down Texas law, which was that you could only get a mail in ballot if you satisfied certain conditions. And you had to apply for it and you had to sign for it so that when you signed for it and then you mailed your ballot back in and you signed your, basically the envelope for your ballot, the signatures matched. When they mail them out to everybody, when they were trying to mail them out to everybody, there's no way to determine who votes. You have no proof that the person that turned that in is actually the person that was supposed to vote. And that's how the election got shifted. All of these. We stopped it. I did fight it. We had 12 lawsuits. We stopped it. There was millions of dollars spent in an effort to turn Texas blue. And we fought other states like Georgia and Michigan and Wisconsin did not fight it. And guess what? In one big county after another, they were able to turn the election that looked like it was going for Trump because they waited to figure out what the real votes were. And if you have mail in ballots coming in, you can make those be whatever you want because no one knows the truth about who actually voted with those, those, those ballots. And so I think the President has the ability, Congress has the ability to affect federal elections. Now. Our state elections are ours. But if you affect federal elections by saying you can't have male and dollars, what I think are very, very risky, no matter how you do it, even the way we do it in Texas is risky. If the federal government wants to stop mailing ballots, they can stop mailing ballots for federal elections.
- [36:08]
A
Yeah, it's unbelievable. The videos are enough to see these videos of people stuffing things in the middle of the night at two in the morning and they suddenly win an election by 70 votes. It's deeply troubling. The other deeply troubling part of this, Ken, is the George Soros connection here now. Soros funds the Open Society Institute, which writes articles denying election fraud. Of course that's a lie. Election fraud is as old as elections themselves. So what's to be done about that? Is that his First Amendment right in as well with this?
- [36:40]
C
Look, he can, he certainly can say this and he's spending a lot of money to make people feel bad about telling, just acknowledging the truth, which is we absolutely. I can tell you just from what I know, in Texas, when we got stopped from prosecuting voter fraud for several years, we're just getting geared back to do that. But we had, we had over 100 cases of election fraud. We prosecuted Cases of election fraud that were real. We're involved in prosecuting one night right now. They got referred by a DA before we got the Stevens case. That hurt our ability to prosecute overturned. So there is. Even though they tell you there's no voter fraud and they try to convince you that there's nothing, that's sort of the way they keep it going. They make you feel like you're an idiot for talking about it. But I can tell you, on election night, I knew that President Trump was going to lose when they stopped counting ballots. For the first time in my life, I knew exactly what was happening in the big counties. They were waiting for the real ballots to come in, figure out how many votes they needed, and then it was just a matter of how many bailout ballots can we do? We need to change the vote. And it would took them three days to get there, which had never happened before. It was. I went to bed knowing at 10:30, even though Trump was ahead in every one of the battleground states by a fair bit, I knew that he was going to lose. Because all they had to do was figure out how many votes they needed and bring in enough mail in ballots that were not verified. We have no idea who voted in them. That's what they did in the big counties and whether it was Fulton or whether it was Milwaukee county, that's how they won the election.
- [38:04]
D
Who is they? Who do you think was behind things?
- [38:08]
A
Can these people be behind bars?
- [38:10]
C
I think it was people like Soros. I think he. It was Soros. I think Zuckerberg funded some of this. I mean, there was a lot of money. It was a lot of money because just to do it in Texas the way they did it, I was, it was clear to me that I was fighting so many different places, that this was an orchestrated effort. I, I called it out before it happened. I called it out to President Trump before it happened. I said, I said, I think you're going to lose on mail in ballots, because if they get, if they can do this in Texas and they're successful, you will not win Texas. He didn't think he could lose Texas, but I'm telling you, had they sent out because just in Harris county, they were going to send out 7, 6 or 7 million ballots. Trump only won by 620,000 votes the first time. So imagine if you do that in Austin, you do that in Dallas, you do that in El Paso, you do that in San Antonio. It doesn't take much to overcome 620,000 votes. When you got 15 million ballots out and nobody knows who actually voted.
- [39:05]
D
That's wild.
- [39:06]
A
Geez.
- [39:07]
D
Well, let's talk about redistricting, because that's a popular topic in Texas. Lawmakers have redrawn the districts, and Democrats are complaining that it dilutes minority voters. Now, when they say this, it really bothers me because it says to me that they think that anyone who's a minority is automatically a Democrat and they're a monolith and they can't think for themselves. And in fact, Democratic strategists admitted this in the New York Times recently. This came out last week where Democrats say that they get most of their votes voters through nonprofits that target underprivileged communities for registration. Again, assuming those voters will default to Democrats. That feels to me very predatory. The Obama administration went even further, requiring voter registration at the dmv. Wellhab. Wellhab is not a word. Welfare and rehab centers, food stamp lines. It's clear who they're targeting and what they think of their voters. They call. But they are calling redistricting this packing and cracking. So tell us about Texas efforts to redraw the districts, and maybe you can address some of this controversy.
- [40:15]
C
Well, first of all, the hypocrisy is incredible. I mean, the Democrats have been doing this for decades. I mean, look at Illinois, where our Democrats went, or Massachusetts, where our Democrats went, or New York, where our Democrats went. They're all gerrymandered. I mean, Massachusetts doesn't have a single Republican representative in Congress. That's pretty gerrymandered. How about Illinois? They only have three out of 17 when the state votes 44% Republican in the last election. And of course, New York's no different. And so it's. They don't actually believe what they're saying. It's pure politics on their part to say it, because they're running to states that have already done it. On the other hand, Texas has a really legitimate reason for redistricting. In the middle of the cycle, we have grown by millions of people. Our lines need to be changed and more fairly represent the people that are there because certain areas have grown more than others as a result of all the people from Illinois and New York and California coming to our state to get out of these terrific Democratic policies and high taxes. So part of the reason we're doing this is because of these states have lost so many people to us, and it is necessary and effective for us to have our representation match the population.
- [41:22]
D
Well, how do you respond to accusations, though, of diluting minorities? And perhaps you can respond to this idea that minority voters are by default underprivileged people and Democrats. To me that seems like such a racist assumption. And we saw during the Trump election that in fact a lot of minorities broke for Trump because they do actually think for themselves. They don't think along a monolith. So can you respond to that?
- [41:49]
C
I think the Democratic Party, they have many racist assumptions and that's what they live on and they try to create racial divides. The reality is Donald Trump attracted Hispanics, blacks that had never been attacked, attracted to the Republican Party before. And it was partly because of his great policies and his great message, but it was also because they could compare it to failure. And they, the people that live in Texas are affected by illegal immigration. And this idea that we're just going to have 20 million people across the border and we're going to take care of them and it affects everybody in this country. And they can see that. They also tend to be conservative voters. Hispanic voters are conservative voters. And they're catching on to the fact that Democratic Party has lost, lied to them and doesn't offer them any hope of a better future. And so people are catching on to the reality of the Democratic Party which just panders to leftist woke ideas that don't help this country and don't help the people of this country be successful and have opportunity.
- [42:44]
A
Ken, we'll get you out of here on this. You just launched on August 26th an investigation into major baby food manufacturers for selling products tainted with high levels of heavy metals. How the hell does that happen, number one? And what are you hoping to uncover in this investigation?
- [43:03]
C
Well, we're trying. It is shocking to actually say that. I mean, you kind of stuttered as you said it because it's hard to believe. But we are investigating them because we think there's a real possibility that these baby foods have high concentrations of metals that are harmful to babies. And so if that's true, we are going to stop them from doing that. Just like we, we got Kellogg's and we need to get others like Post to stop poisoning our cereals because Kellogg's has agreed to stop doing it, Post has not. And other we're going to go after all these food manufacturers that are poisoning especially our children, but really poisoning the American people.
- [43:41]
A
I love it. Do you have much help coming from the federal government on this, on hhs? I know this is Bobby Kennedy's wheelhouse right now, keeping this food away from our children. I think our American food supply is poisoned.
- [43:54]
C
He is awesome. He's Been doing a great job. He's actually in Texas today. I know he was meeting with the legislature. He encouraged them to pass certain legislation that only helps the state. It helps protect children, helps protect our Texans. And so, yeah, he's. He's kind of the visionary behind this, and he's probably the guy that got me the most interested in this topic. So, you know, I give him a lot of credit for what he's doing and what he's accomplishing because. Cause it's having an impact.
- [44:18]
A
Wonderful.
- [44:19]
D
Well, we give you a lot of credit, Mr. Attorney General. It was really a pleasure to have you on redacted for the first time. We followed your work closely. So thank you for your time. Thanks for coming.
- [44:27]
A
We need more attorneys general like you across the country, that's for sure. Ken, great to have you here on the show.
- [44:32]
C
I'd love to come back. Thank you.
- [44:34]
A
Thank you. Thanks so much for your time. All right, coming up here on the show, we're going to talk about the Minnesota Shooter. A lot of new details coming out about this horrific shooting event in Minnesota. And of course, the mainstream media running cover, as it always does for these types of killers. You know, we have a quite. We have a lot of questions about where antidepressants involved, what sort of hormone replacement therapy was being. Because we now know that this person was trans.
- [44:57]
D
Oh, I got lectured by GPT for asking those questions.
- [45:00]
A
Oh, I did too. It was hilarious.
- [45:01]
D
You know that you're on.
- [45:03]
A
Exactly.
- [45:03]
D
You're over the target when you get lectured by your AI.
- [45:06]
A
By AI. It's hilarious.
- [45:08]
D
Also, hey, the Los Angeles Games, they're gonna be the greenest ever. Do you recall the Paris Olympics and how that went? Yeah. So is this gonna be a woke crap show? We're gonna show you what they promised for their Olympics and what they're saying now. Yeah. Ever tried public transportation in Los Angeles?
- [45:25]
A
I don't even think it exists.
- [45:27]
D
Yeah. Oh, I'm gonna show you.
- [45:28]
A
But they're gonna make all the Olympics. The Olympic athletes rely on that. Okay.
- [45:31]
D
No one's gonna show up for their event on time.
- [45:34]
A
Good luck. I couldn't even breathe in Los Angeles. I've only been there once. And it tastes like. The air tastes like dirt.
- [45:40]
C
The air tastes like dirt.
- [45:41]
B
I was like, what the hell?
- [45:42]
C
How do you live like that? So.
- [45:44]
D
And having the Olympic Games there, like. Well, I was raised in California and many times in California, you. They would tell us, we can't have PE today because of the air quality. That's how Northern Californians, that's how we grew up. It's like, oh, PE Was on the schedule. We literally can't do it because of the air. How are they gonna protect these athletes? I don't understand.
- [46:06]
A
So that's PJ Pickett in our rumble chat. Says, what horrible things are they gonna do to the 700,000 homeless people? Well, probably they won't do much. Maybe they'll move 10 cities. I don't know. But maybe all you need is Xi Jinping from China to fly in. And maybe Gavin Newsom will clean up.
- [46:21]
D
This is funny. They promised something like 10,000 new hotel rooms, and now they're saying we're not gonna going to do any of that. So you could sleep with a homeless person. You could just get a tent and sleep out there with them, I suppose. All right, so wait till you see the details of that. But first, we want to tell you about our friends over at Balance of Nature. Because their supplements are the result of years of research and development, they regularly test their products using independent third party laboratory analysis. Balance of Nature does not add any sugar or artificial anything. They do not attempt to, you know, process, overly process this. They are just trying to mimic what nature provides. They let, or not mimic, rather, but let nature itself do the job. Delivering the phytonutrients that occur naturally in 47 whole fruits, vegetables, spices and fibers. The vitamins that and minerals that naturally occur in whole foods are also present in these supplements. So, you know, if you're going about your day and you find it hard to to eat the rainbow as they tell the kids to do, you're not getting your fruits and veggies. Well, you can help to supplement with Balance of Nature. They're the only supplement on the market with 12amazing spices and four whole fibers. So even with a solid routine, you know, Most of us, 90% of us, don't meet the recommendation of dietary fibers. So give them a try. Head on over to balanceofnature.com sign up as a preferred customer with code code redacted and you'll get 35 off your first order plus a free fiber and spice supplement. So hurry up. This offer is only available while supplies lasts. Go to balanceofnature.com Again, the code is redacted to get 35 off. Get your system going right with nature's help, all in one little capsule. Balanceofnature.com all right, well, we got a.
- [48:09]
A
Lot of information flowing in right now on the Minnesota shooter this morning. A horrific, absolute, absolutely senseless act of violence unfolded at the Annunciation Catholic school in Minneapolis. And while the corporate media is of course scrambling right now to hide the facts, we have the truth. And here's what we know at this hour. So while children were in morning mass praying, this man is a man, a biological man who now was pretending to be a woman. Identified the shooter identified his sources as a transgender man, using the name Robin Westman. He was formerly Robert Westman, opened fire on the church and school during a morning mass, killing two innocent children, injuring 17 others. A couple of these children who are in the hospital right now in critical condition. So unfortunately, that number might change. And then in a final act of cowardice, the shooter then took his own life right in the middle of the church. And he planned it that way. He knew exactly where he was going to go. He knew this church well. In fact, he had a map of it. He had drawn a map of exactly where he would be with the pews and where he was going to take his own life. And he released a video in the video showing exactly where he was going to do it. Using this knife, he slammed it right into the notebook to show the spot where he was going to take his own life after he mowed down the children again, he knew this church well because it turns out his mom worked there for years and she had recently retired. Here was her going away. Announcement from the church of an uncle. On Sunday, we honored Mary Grace Westman, who's retiring from the Annunciation Church. She's been there for years. Congratulations on your retirement. Now, she retired a few years ago and she allowed her son, while he was a minor, to change his name legally from Robert to Robin, according to the court records that are now public, which you can of course see for yourself there. She see her name right there at the top, Mary Grace Westman. And allowing him to change his name to Robin Westman because again, he was a minor at the time. He was 17 years old at the time, so this was allowed. But let's listen to the police chief earlier today describing the scene and what they found. Police officers from the Minneapolis Police Department immediately responded, entered the church and attempted to provide first aid and rescue some of the children that were hiding throughout the building. While other first responders came and EMS responded to rush victims to nearby hospitals, two young children, ages 8 and 10 were killed where they sat in the pews. Of course, the mainstream media and the police would normally hide the identity of the shooter if it doesn't fit their narrative, especially if it's in a liberal city like Minneapolis. But this time they couldn't because it got out all over social media ahead of time. So this is the shooter that turns out to be a transgender male. Just before the shooting, Robert or Robin posted a ranting video on YouTube, seemingly like possessed by demons or something, rambling about having bugs under his skin. This is some kind of bizarre, unhinged behavior the legacy media always like, seems to sweep under the rug. Oh, it's a trans person with mental issues, probably on some kind of hormones and all sorts of drugs, who knows? And they're saying that they've got bugs under their skin and they're ranting and raving. We're gonna hide that because it doesn't fit our liberal narrative with the trans agenda. So immediately they jumped into action, though, and they certainly jumped in as they tried to hide it as quickly as they could because they deleted all of his social media. All of was it. His social media was scrubbed across Multiple platforms, including YouTube. Immediately scrubbed it. Wiped his whole channel down. So that video was gone. But it's kind of amazing to me because some of the things that were said in that video, I mean, if we were to put that kind of stuff on our channel, we would immediately be flagged for it. But I don't know how like YouTube allowed this channel to be up there with him, like talking about basically killing Donald Trump and when worse and all sorts of other stuff. But they let that go until I guess everyone jumped on and realized that he had a YouTube channel. And then YouTube scrubbed it. YouTube did remove the video. So we're not going to show it to you here. He posted two videos. You can see them all over X if you want to watch it. But we're not going to do it here because YouTube has already taken it down. But we can show you some still images here in a moment. But the details get every given get even more outrageous because the shooter had an ammo magazine with the words Kill Donald Trump scrawled on it. Another said, for the children, ha ha ha. You can see here, ha ha, ha ha. That's funny. And in the video he's just like laughing about killing the children. We can also confirm that he had a target on the wall with the face of Jesus Christ on top in a target. Clearly intention to kill Catholics, to kill Christians, to kill children. That was his goal, right on a target in his room. Like, what more of an example do you need? You have ammunition. You're laying out exactly what you're going to do. Jesus Christ is up on a target on the wall. You've got children written on your Ammo magazine. What more of a motive do you need? Oh, but the police chief just a few minutes ago in Minneapolis came back out to the podium to tell the world that we have identified no motive, that there is no motive with this guy. No motive. We've all seen the video. Are you out of your frickin mind? You have picture of Jesus Christ on your wall. There's no motive. Are you kidding me? You're gonna kill children written on. You're targeting Donald Trump. You want to go after Donald Trump? You're trying to go after Christian conservative children.
- [53:52]
D
Well, you could also see in these videos that he went through some of his journals, apology letters to his family. Again, these have not been independently verified, but they were on the videos and he was saying, I've been depressed for a long time. Also I think I have lung cancer and so I'm just not going to die of cancer. Now, who knows if that's true, right? This kind of paranoia is very common when you are on ssri. So it is worth asking, was this person and this neuroses manufactured by pharmaceuticals? That's a valid question.
- [54:29]
A
Well, absolutely to me. I tweeted this earlier. I said the one common denominator in all of these mass shootings across the United States is always some sort of connection to antidepressants and SSRIs. We've done deep dive videos here and interviews here on the channel about this. I encourage you to go check them out. But it's a common denominator in all of these shootings. Now a lot of it is kept hidden, obviously. Obviously. Because they're minors at the time, so we don't get access to their medical records. But then we learn from family and friends that oh yes, this guy in relation to what happened to Columbine, he was on antidepressants. And now we know from pharmacists, we know that they're handing out these SSRIs like they're candy. It's just unbelievable how much antidepressants are flowing into our children. They're basically sitting there like drones these days. And then when you add that on top of like trans hormones.
- [55:22]
D
Well, exactly, yeah. Because trans hormones also increase risk of cancer. So we don't know if he actually had cancer or not. He, he might have just been super paranoid thinking that he was, you know, that. That's not been reported anywhere. But yes. And the fact that he transitioned, that his mother allowed him to transition his name, the data is irrefutable that when a child transitions, it does not make them better. It locks them in to a path of misery. And most of the time the gender dysphoria persists and it only makes them sterile, locks them into a pain of always trying to convince the world that they are something they're not. And it worsens their depression and their body dysphoria. So, you know, that's not refutable science at this point. I can, I can give you a laundry list of studies that show this. So he was allowed to go down a path that was destructive. We don't know what hormones then he was on after this name change. But it's likely. I mean, from the photos we've got, it doesn't seem like any cross sex hormones were being very effective. He still very much looks like a boy, but we just don't know. We are absolutely, as a society owed those answers.
- [56:40]
A
Well, and also like so today's Annunciation Catholic Church shooter identified as trans. The Aberdeen shooter identified as trans. The Nashville Christian shooter identified as trans. The Lakewood Church shooter identified as trans. I mean the list is like endless. I don't know how many I'm missing here in all of this. Now a lot of people saying, oh, this could have been a false flag operation, you know. Well, I think, I mean, and absolutely, I mean, look, we're open to anything. I mean, absolutely. Was this a false flag operation? I mean, let us know in the chat room if you think that this was a false flag operation. To what end though? Like targeting Christians to incite. What exactly is this a motivation towards? I always look when you have a false flag. But what is the answer here? I mean, I think as people are saying in the chat, we are owed this answer. Exactly.
- [57:24]
D
Well, Kash Patel says that they are looking into prosecution as a hate crime. And I hate everything about this story, but I do not believe in hate crimes full stop. So those kind of things always expand the government's power. Look at the piece that I did about Matthew Shepard and how hate crimes were introduced based on a lie and have only expanded government power. So sure there's an angle for how this continues to expand government power. I'm open to this. We don't know right now. It only happened today.
- [57:53]
A
And to go after Christians to target, I mean, who, who would have carried this out, you know, was some people saying, oh, he could have been like mkultur, brainwashed by the CIA and carried out this operation. You know, you always look for disillusioned individuals that you can brainwash. We've interviewed many people here on this show. Who are survivors of MK Ultra. So we're open to it. But obviously this story is developing and we will continue to follow it as these details emerge. So we're in the early hours of this story, but that is what we know for sure right now.
- [58:22]
D
All right.
- [58:23]
A
Yeah.
- [58:24]
D
Well, coming up, we're going to talk about the Los Angeles Olympics and how it's going to be a hot mess because they're trying to be eco friendly. They're trying to out eco friendly the Paris games by 10%. And those games were a crap show. So we're going to show you what they have planned. Don't go. I don't think you'll be comfortable. Don't go if you like being comfortable. I would not do that.
- [58:46]
A
No.
- [58:46]
D
So, okay. But before we do that, we're going to tell you about our friends over at American Financing because if you've been living on credit cards to cover your expenses, you know that those interest rates are brutal. Why keep paying 20 or more to the banks when you can call our friends at American Financing. They have mortgage rates in the fives and they're showing people every day how to keep more of your hard earned money in your pocket out of the hands of the credit card companies. Right now American Financing is helping homeowners save an average of $800 a month by using their home equity to wipe out out their high interest debt with no upfront fees, no obligations. Just a 10 minute call to a salary based mortgage consultant. And here's the kicker. If you start today, you could delay two mortgage payments putting even more cash in your hands right away. So don't wait. Learn this skill that wealthy people do all the time is they leverage their assets. So learn how to do it. Go to americanfinancing.netacted or call them at 866-890-8434. They have their NMLS number 182334. If you're looking them up on nmlsconsumeraccess.org their APR for rates right now is in the fives. It starts at 6.327 for well qualified buyers. And those rates are presumably going to start to come down if the Fed lowers rates this week, which or in the next few days, which they're signaling they might do. So call them and learn about this. 866-890-8434 today. All right. Welcome to the rebellion. Charlie Garth. And you might know that if you subscribe, your name will pop up there on the screen. And we appreciate that. And sometimes we put up Comments. There was one earlier that said, we all know we hate Natalie and we're here for Clayton. They love you.
- [60:26]
A
Okay.
- [60:27]
D
You're just so charming. I just wanted to give you that compliment.
- [60:31]
A
Thank you. I appreciate that. Yes, it was all over his weapons. Yes, there was stuff all over his weapons, but again, okay. Anyway, he was also nuts, and we know that for sure.
- [60:40]
D
What was all over his book?
- [60:41]
A
He had like, all sorts of like Holocaust symbols and Nazi stuff and I think all over his.
- [60:47]
D
Okay, yeah.
- [60:48]
A
But every day someone in their chat just said, yes, everything is. Everything is anti Semitic these days. Doesn't matter what it is. So.
- [60:54]
D
Okay.
- [60:54]
A
Anyway, we're still learning more about it, so we'll see as the story unfolds. We're not going to jump to any conclusions. We're giving you what we know. But we're still waiting on the SSS SSRI question and the toxicology report of this guy. Okay.
- [61:06]
D
Well, The Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games are shaping up to be a political spectacle of failure, much like the Paris Games. Now, not only did the Paris Games offend a bunch of people with this trans Last supper sacrilege, but they also showed that when you put your focus on eco friendly, carbon neutral, what have you, you make people extremely uncomfortable. The athletes going to Paris last year may have thought they were going to get some great haute cuisine because, you know, the French were the inventor of that. But no, in fact, they had food shortages. Athletes were starving because the organizers tried to offer a one third plant based menu. And athletes who are competing, most of them do not want that. They were also rational ratcheting meat and eggs because of high demand. The British team hired a cook because the food in the Olympic village was so insufficient. Organizers went without air conditioning because they thought, we're gonna really save the planet. And athletes complained because it's the middle of summer in France, it's hot. So a lot of them went to find hotels with ac. Organizers put these recycled beds made of cardboard in the Olympic village and athletes said, these were terrible. They couldn't get proper rest to compete. The American basketball players were like, we cannot. We're seven feet tall.
- [62:27]
A
Can you imagine an American basketball player sleeping on cardboard? It would literally collapse under the weight.
- [62:32]
D
And they were like, absolutely not.
- [62:34]
A
So, Joe Kitchen, Is it weightlifting? Isn't weightlifting in the Summer Olympics? That's not a Winter Olympic sport, Right? It's.
- [62:41]
D
Yeah. Could you imagine put a weightlifter on that cardboard bed?
- [62:46]
A
Yeah, like a heavyweight boxer is gonna lay on that.
- [62:48]
C
Not for long.
- [62:50]
A
I'm Sleeping on a bunch of comic book boxes like what the hell is this?
- [62:53]
D
Like the Princess and the Pea. Yeah. So it was a big joke. Well, Los Angeles thinks that joke is worth repeating because nothing's new in Hollywood. They like sequels, so they're gonna just do the whole same thing. Here is their sustainability plan for the 2028 Games. They want to take those green initials initiatives and kick it up a notch by 10%. They're saying we want to beat the carbon footprint of the Paris Games by 10%. So athletes and visitors bring your own food and bedding. They're calling this a no build and transit first plan. Translation? There's no new venues for the athletes, there's no new place to stay and you're not going to be able to get around Los Angeles. They're saying that the only transit they'll have is the first and last mile, which is a total bait and switch from their Olympic bids. Now if you follow, when a city wants to host the Games, they compete with several other cities and put together these plans and they woo the ioc, the Olympic Committee and they say it's going to be so great. You know, Los Angeles is going to look amazing. People are going to love it. We're going to do all these awesome things. Well, here is Los Angeles bid for the Games and they have totally thrown it all over in the trash. This where they said we're going to have new accommodations and new transportation in Los Angeles if they win the Games. They're not going to do that. Let's start with the accommodations. In their pitch, Los Angeles promised an additional 10,000 hotel rooms. That was the hook because it's hard to get a room in Los Angeles and it's expensive. But in their so called sustainability plan, there's nothing. They're calling this again a no build game. Names translation. Good luck finding a hotel room. We didn't build those and we're probably not going to. We're just not, we're not going to do that. We're going to try and rebuild, you know, the Pacific Palisades a little bit, but we, we don't have the bandwidth. You're on your own. As for transportation, transportation, if you've ever lived or been to la, you know, public transit is already a joke. And in the original bid, they bragged about a 300 billion dollar infrastructure including the Purple Line subway to connect UC UCLA where the Olympic Village will be with downtown. That was a big selling point. The updated plan, all of that is suddenly described as independent of the Games. In other Words, not our problem. Maybe it'll be done by 2028, maybe not. If you take a look at this, this is the Metro timeline. It said it'd be done by 2025. It's not going to. They literally don't know when they're going to finish it. Kind of like the rail, the railroad in California from North Northern to Southern California. They just. I don't know who's to ask? So it will probably not be finished by the Games. They're saying that's an independent project, we have nothing to do with it. So we don't know. You're kind of on your own battling the traffic. And then they're told to hop on a tram or a bike for that, you know, transit. And then they may have something for either the first or the last mile when you're getting out. That's it. That's all they can do. No major transportation, just like some buses. So they're not promising that anymore. And they're framing this again as like, it's beyond our scope. Even though it was clearly in the bid, LA visitors will be on their own. And here's how many people they're expecting for 30 days. 206 competitions, 183 for the Paralympics. Over 11,000 athletes. And what does it say for fans? 15. 10 to 15 million ticketed fans with no public transportation, no promises of extra hotel rooms, nothing. Because it's no build. In other words, we're basically, we're doing it as is. We're gonna do it live.
- [66:33]
A
To get somewhere in, you know, in Los Angeles takes like 40 minutes. No matter what you're doing, like, just to go down the street takes like 40 minutes. Right now you're gonna add another 50. That many people to the mix.
- [66:43]
D
10 billion. What did they say? Yeah, 10 million extra fans plus 11,000 athletes, plus their coaches, plus the media. And so. And they're saying, we're not going to build anything new. We got this, it's fine how it is. And. Oh, but they say they're going to incentivize walking and biking, so they might have some bike shares, which, like, if, you know, if we wanted to bring our kids to see a basketball game, we're not gonna all. One of them is not even. She's eight. She can't do a ride share, she can't do her own bike share. So, like, that's not a sustainable way for a family. So we're all gonna have to drive in LA traffic, which is a nightmare. Oh, and bring your own water bottle in the summertime. Right. And Philip was bringing up before the commercial break that LA has a spa smog problem. There's no way really to address this for the Games. As a Northern Californian, as I was when I was growing up, regularly, we would say, they would tell us, you can't do PE today because the smog is too bad. So we just couldn't do it. How are they going to have these athletes doing athletic events in LA smog? How can they secure that and then brag about being eco friendly? That I don't understand. Oh, and you know, bring your own water bottle because they're going to be serving drinks in these reusable cups. I don't know if you saw the closing ceremonies at the Paris Games where they handed it off to Los Angeles and it was like Tom Cruise and the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Well, they're pretty excited that they had the drinks that they sold in reusable cups. And so they're gonna keep doing that, which means it'll surge the price of your drinks and then you'll be. Get some money back possibly if you return the cups. Much like a European Christmas market when you get the mugs. So yeah, they're gonna do that. Which means everything will be super expensive. So we are taking bets on whether or not this will be Paris 2.0, an eco friendly disaster or not. Let us know what you think and then when that inevitably happens, we'll come back around and say, we told you so.
- [68:44]
A
Do you remember that the opening ceremonies where you had like the Satanists, it was like this, it was like the satanic last supper in Paris. And they're like mocking. Yeah, they were like mocking Christians, you know.
- [68:54]
D
Oh, 100%. The, the Hollywood one will probably, probably be full of cult rituals way worse.
- [68:59]
A
Oh, I'm sure it'll be. Yeah, get Beyonce involved. Yeah, there it is.
- [69:03]
D
Right? Yeah. Well, they're doing it right in front of us, so. All right, let me know what you think. How can they just do this? Like make this amazing bid to host the Games and be like, we're not doing any of that. We're just gonna, we're gonna wing it. It's gonna be like this.
- [69:20]
A
Yeah.
- [69:23]
D
That'S fun, right? All right, well that's gonna do it for our show today. Anything else?
- [69:28]
A
Yeah, no, I just wanna help me, help me with the mental gymnastics here. Cause a lot of people can't figure this out either because there's like, some are saying, oh, this was a, this Minnesota shooting was an, an attack on Israel and, and I just don't understand that. I mean, people are pointing out that he had, like, Masala written on, like, one of the magazines or one of the guns. And that is, of course, a tribute to Islam, but he also had Jesus Christ in the crosshairs. Like, can you really make these sort of mental. I just. I'm trying to understand the mental gymnastics to say that this was an attack on Israel when they literally went into a Catholic church. I mean, others saying, oh, he was programmed and he was, you know, MK Ultraed and he was part of a false flag. What does she say? That he was brought in by Israel to carry?
- [70:18]
D
No, no, no, no. That this looks like a manifestation of MK Ultra.
- [70:22]
A
Yeah, I mean, maybe. And I don't know, when you listen to it, it certainly sounds like that. I've heard from different whistleblowers who have been on the MK Ultra who've been a victim of it. So I don't know.
- [70:37]
D
I mean, obviously we need to ask questions about how come your parents didn't see this coming? How come you had all this stuff in your room and Jesus Christ on a target? Why was no one brought in to maybe stop? Why was this not. And it brings out.
- [70:51]
A
And how did his mom, who's a Catholic, allow and sign off on this, like, transition document?
- [70:57]
D
Right.
- [70:57]
A
You know, like.
- [70:58]
D
And it brings up this. Where were we recently? In New Jersey. A new law in New Jersey will punish parents if their kids are stealing and thieving or something. Something to that effect. Right. I don't remember the specifics. So how do we feel about that?
- [71:14]
A
Yeah, it's a great point. I see. So the mental gymnastics, what they're trying to say is that this guy was like, a pro Hamas sympathizer. That's why, like, that's what they're trying to paint him now. And many people in the chat are just saying, no, no, no, this guy was just insane. You can't try to rationalize irrationality here. So, yeah, I don't know. P.J. pickett says, how about the 43 people that were subscribers to his YouTube? YouTube channel.
- [71:39]
D
Right.
- [71:40]
A
That's interesting too.
- [71:41]
D
Like, nobody. Maybe they were bots.
- [71:43]
A
But I guess, yeah, here's a super chat. Jennifer Smith. I just had to do a second super chat. Just say, I love Natalie. You guys are great too. But I'm a big Natalie fan. Lol.
- [71:54]
D
Thank you very much. I appreciate that. I wasn't trying to solicit comments. I find it funny when somebody says, we all hate Natalie. It just makes me laugh. It doesn't Hurt my feelings at all. They're. Clayton can tell you how to hurt my feelings in another way.
- [72:08]
A
That's right. Parker. Parker. Quality control says he was a Gaza supporter. Okay, what does that mean? Like, he didn't want. I mean, I don't know. Can you really believe anything the guy said? I mean, he had literally, like, Jesus Christ. He wanted to kill Trump. He's a Gaza supporter. He's. I mean, who knows if he's. If he's any of that, really. I mean, we don't know. Yeah. Wouldn't he have went to a mosque.
- [72:29]
C
Instead of a true church or something?
- [72:31]
D
Yeah, right.
- [72:33]
A
I mean, I don't know. And why shoot Christians? Like, if you want to make like that, if that's your point, is, like, you want to. You're supporting that cause, like, why support. Why kill Christians? It makes no sense. Why. Why wouldn't you. Why wouldn't you like Nat? She's delightful.
- [72:50]
D
There's lots of reasons.
- [72:52]
A
She's very.
- [72:53]
D
Mostly aware of them.
- [72:54]
A
She's very delightful. She's very delightful. By the time she's done telling you all those reasons, you'll agree with her.
- [73:02]
C
Or else.
- [73:05]
A
He was against Zionism, they say. Okay, yeah. Who. I mean, a lot of people are against Zionism. I have. We have a lot of Jewish journalists on our show who are against Zionism. Vehemently against Zionism. Many, many Jews hate Zionism because it bastardizes what Jew. What Judaism is. And where were we? Sailing Prepper. Dark secret says. What was Natalie and Clayton doing on 9 11? Or were you on vacation this year? I think they mean, like, on the day of 9 11. Like, were we involved somehow in 9 11? I can categorically say I was not. I was living in West Virginia at the time. I was a news anchor for an NBC affiliate at the time. And we were, like, crazy running around covering all of the. You know, it was. It was absolute madness. So, no, I was not in New York on 9 11, for sure.
- [73:55]
D
I was a graduate student at USC.
- [73:57]
A
Yeah.
- [73:57]
D
It's verifiable, so, no.
- [74:01]
A
Yeah. All right. Yeah. Some people saying the devil did it, the devil did it. I mean, I. Or SSRIs and all sorts of hormones.
- [74:07]
D
Well, the devil probably does work through SSRIs, so. Yeah, that's what I'm gonna say. A lot of this seems to me the Devil's hands. I'm not even sure exactly what I mean by that, but, you know.
- [74:19]
A
Yeah, I call it whatever you want. It's. There's definitely demonic forces. Yeah. Clayton flew the tower. Clayton flew the plane that hit the tower. Exactly. That's why I'm here to tell you all about it, because it was all faked. Just like the moon landing. All right, everyone, thank you guys for joining us today. We really appreciate it. Are you subscribed to our newsletter? I hope you are. Just go to redacted.inc. it's the best newsletter in the world and we have hundreds of thousands, thousands of you that are subscribed to it. You receive it in your inbox first thing in the morning. Natalie writes it every morning. She works really hard on it. And we have our team that actually publishes it to get it into your inbox first thing in the morning so you can read it over your cup of coffee. And it's a great way for us to stay connected with you covering like four or five of the big stories of the day. Again, go to redacted.inc Click on the sign up for the newsletter button. You'll receive a welcome email. You just need to make sure it doesn't go to your screen spam folder. Gmail labels our newsletter as dangerous, so it might go into that folder, your dangerous folder, but just click on that. Yes, you do want to receive the newsletter and you will receive it tomorrow on Thursday morning in your inbox. So. And it's totally free. All right, everyone, thank you guys so much for joining us here on this Wednesday. Lots of news. Thrilled to have Larry Johnson here. Thrilled to have Ken Paxton on the show today, and we are looking forward to seeing you guys tomorrow. Any final thoughts?
- [75:32]
D
Oh, this is the last time you'll see 46 year old Natalie.
- [75:35]
A
Delightful Natalie. Yes, tomorrow.
- [75:37]
D
Cruel world.
- [75:38]
A
47 years old. Can you believe it?
- [75:40]
D
Yes, I can.
- [75:41]
A
She doesn't look a day over 40. Like four, does she? She doesn't look a day over 20.
- [75:48]
B
A lot of people, like, how are.
- [75:49]
A
You in your 40s? Yeah, she's. Yeah, she's.
- [75:53]
D
That's nice of you. Stop flattering me. I'll see you guys tomorrow.
- [75:57]
A
All right. We're gonna have some fun. Good night, everyone.