Host 1 (2:29)

It's so crazy.

Host 2 (2:30)

Yeah. We also should mention that the Department of Justice had incriminating documents about President Trump and then took them down again. Their allegations, they're victim allegations, which we've seen before in litigation. But we don't have communication from him. We don't have proof. We don't have anything corroborating yet. So why did they take those things down, you wonder if they were just allegations?

Host 1 (2:52)

Well, by the way, there's a now a lawsuit or a motion by two different judges in New York to try to get the entire DOJ website taken down that has all of the Epstein library documents on there, or at least the 3 million that are, you know, heavily redacted. Of course, so. Because they say the victims. The victims. Okay. But most of that's redacted. In fact, the testimonies are missing from these Epstein documents and they should be actually part of the trend because of the Transparency Act. So let's get into all of that today. Good to see everyone live today. We are live on Rumble. We are live on YouTube. We are live on X. So thank you guys for subscribing and being a part of our show here. We really appreciate it. All right. Well, Friday night, The DOJ released 3 million pages included in the Epstein documents dump. This was all part of the Epstein Transparency act led by Ro Khanna and Congressman Thomas Massie. At first glance, one might assume that massive document dump would provide massive answers and a clear line to arrests and prosecutions. There'd be people in handcuffs today, but it doesn't. But when you dig a little deeper, you realize the document dump was engineered by Pam Bondi's DOJ to be basically an intentional obfuscation. That's the way that I see it, where there's almost no context at all. Millions of sort of disparate pieces about pedophiles, Bill Gates, STDs, torture videos, cannibalism, Palantir. I mean, I mean, you have like Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratory. I mean, there's so much stuff in here, all with very little context to go on. Fragments and redactions. One former FBI agent described it as controlled confusion on purpose, that this is being weaponized on purpose.

Host 2 (4:40)

What Philip called it over the weekend was chum. They gave us some chum. Like we can chew on it for a while, get us all worked up, and we are, for sure. But there are more questions than answers.

Host 1 (4:50)

Now, I should also point out that according to our sources at Redacted, there was supposed to be a meeting today or over the next 24 hours overseas with the delegation from Russia and the United States. We're talking Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, members of the Trump administration that was abruptly canceled. Now, the New York Times is kind of like spinning that it's all fine, nothing really to see here, but suddenly there was a beeline for Mar a Lago and an emergency meeting, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant in Mar a Lago. So that was called off. Zelensky, the Russian delegation immediately called off and an emergency meeting being held at Mar A Lago. We don't know what's going on. We're trying to get more details about that, and hopefully we will. Meanwhile, Congressman Ro Khanna, Congressman Thomas Massie are not happy, as you can imagine. According to the DOJ, there are about 6 million documents, but they only released about 3 million of them. Thousands of videos, thousands of photos, a lot more that they didn't release. Now, I spoke on the phone with Congressman Thomas Massie just a short time ago this morning, and he's not happy. And I wanted to ask him specifically, what are you, you know, what are you not happy about? Like, what specifically are you waiting on from the doj? And he said the DOJ is intentionally hiding key parts of the Epstein files release. At the top of the list is names of the perpetrators. He wants to know why the key names of people who speak about torturing children or death threats or who involved in criminal activities are redacted because they're not supposed to be people who threatened Mark Epstein, Epstein's brother, that they were going to, quote, kill him, just like we did. Your brother in prison will suffocate you, will suffocate you as well. So. Or the torture videos, you know, where are you? Are you okay? I love the torture video. I'm in China. I'll be in on the.

Guest 1 (6:52)

The.

Host 1 (6:52)

The US in the second week of May. I'm in China. I love the torture video, though. Like, why is that name redacted? And Congressman Massie wants to know why. Because it's under the law. The Transparency act is not supposed to be. Massie wants to know why these potential criminals are being protected by Trump's DOJ as part of the Transparency Act. They are not to be hidden or redacted, but they are. Massie also told me this morning, at the top of his list of his concerns are the victims stories and testimonies. They are supposed to be unredacted and released, specifically the 302 forms. Now here's an example of an FBI 302 form from the Warren Commission. You know, the laughable Warren Commission, but just so you get a sense of what they look like. 302 forms are summaries of interviews conducted by FBI agents. Agents taking notes as victims pour their hearts out about the, about Epstein, about the cabal that tortured people, raped, abused them, what they saw. And of course, these are summaries then by the FBI. So what happened to them? These 302 victims? Testimonies were supposed to be unredacted and released. They were not. The DOJ's. Todd Blanch says they're done. They've looked at all the documents. They've met their legal requirement, which is a bald face, lie watch.

DOJ Representative (Todd Blanch) (8:08)

There are a small number of documents, as I said on Friday, that we're waiting for a judge to, to say we can, we're allowed to release because of a protective order. But there, this, this review is over. I mean, we reviewed over 6 million pieces of paper, thousands of videos, thousands, tens of thousands of images and. Which is what the statute required us to do. You know, it's interesting. Leadership on the, on the Hill, Congressman Massie, Senator Schumer are quick to complain. There is no way they have spent any time looking at the materials we produce, because I know the materials we produce. We produce them on Friday. By Saturday, they're already complaining about what we did. And by the way, apparently Massie and others wrote a letter to come and review unredacted materials. I didn't get that letter yet. They leaked it to the press before they actually sent it to me. But, yeah, that's absolutely, totally fine. We have nothing to hide. We have nothing to hide. We never did. And our doors are open if they want to come and review any of the materials that we produced.

Host 1 (9:10)

Except you do have a lot to hide, because as I just laid out, there's plenty of things you didn't follow the letter of the law and actually release. Massie also told me, of course they know that these 302 forms exist because the victims told them specifically that they'd given testimony to the FBI, the FBI agents, who then filled them out. So, of course Blanche is lying and Trump's DOJ is lying here.

Host 2 (9:34)

Can we just for one second, a quick second, fantasize what a serious government would do with this kind of information release? What would we expect from a government that wanted this to stop. It's like, here you have it. Now this has been happening. These powerful people were involved. Don't complain, you got it. But a serious government would say, we need all. Need shovels, all hands on deck.

Host 1 (9:58)

Like an all hands on deck situation.

Host 2 (9:59)

We need to dig out who is remotely connected to this and make sure that they don't have power over the American people and decisions and nobody is. They're just like, you got it, let's move on. Nobody's worried about the rest of us. Have to think about sitting in this swamp of muck.

Host 1 (10:18)

Imagine being okay with allowing this to be done. Like, oh, so I'm sorry children were killed and tortured and you're okay with that? What kind of a sick person is like, I don't care, Move on now.

Host 2 (10:26)

You know it happened.

Guest 2 (10:29)

And not only that, like, what really chaps my ass is this, this investigation wasn't done last year. All of this information has been there for like many administrations and nobody has done a damn thing right because they're just, they're all, they're all implicated.

Host 2 (10:43)

Well, I think I've been obsessed with how far we can go back to the government's knowledge of Epstein and the fact that he had done an anonymous FOIA request for his own records to see if the government knew about him working with the CIA. And we don't know what he got from it, but that was at least during the Clinton administration. So now as far as we knew before, we could only go back to Bush. Now I think we're going back even further than that. Which means again, if you're trying to squeeze this through a partisan lens, you're an idiot. This goes both sides, everyone powerful.

Host 1 (11:19)

So where the hell are these victim statements? I mean, of course these statements that Massie's asking about would reveal rapists, torturers locations, so much more. Right. Massie also told me that the DOJ didn't release information about Epstein's co conspirators during his arrest, that Epstein didn't act alone. So he had co conspirators. We know this as identified by the FBI and the doj, but for whatever reason they withheld that, redacted that information. But the American people want this information. Again, this is a violation of the law under the Transparency act that they just passed and President Trump signed. So Blanche, to sit there and say we followed the letter of the law is a lie. There were co conspirators, there was a client list, by the way, turns out this was another bald faced lie.

Host 2 (12:05)

And if you See our memo on Epstein. You will see.

Advertiser (12:09)

Excuse me.

Host 2 (12:09)

Our memo on Epstein clearly points out that there was no client list. Our July 6th memo.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (12:16)

Okay.

Host 1 (12:17)

A lie, of course. Clear to see one other key and very important missing document from the DOJ files release that Massie and Ro Khanna demanded is the documents related to who authorized his first prison sentence to be so damn lenient. This is actually in the Transparency act unredacted. Who gave that authorization? Who said make it lenient? This again was demanded by Congress, signed into law by the President, United States, specifically. Who allowed them to do this? Almost no time in prison for child sexual abuse. The doj, of course, is hiding this information. So they say they're done. Massie and Ro Khanna say, no, you're not. You have not followed the letter of the law. And of course you have like the MAGA sort of, you know, influencer crowd, the binders crowd, just saying, see, there it is. Move along now. Yeah, move along.

Host 2 (13:10)

There's evil, you know, eating people kind of thing in here. It happened. We got it. Let's keep going.

Host 1 (13:17)

Well, we've got more news to get to. We're going to unpack a lot of things today. We want to go deeply into the collusion of the media. The media piece of this is actually pretty shocking. We're going to unpack all of that. We're also going to look at the child sacrifice and pedophilia ring and how deep this cannibalism piece goes. Because now a lot of pieces are starting to come together. Even though there are fragments, we're starting to piece it all together here about how deep and sick this actually is. And the people that are alleged to have seen and witnessed all of this child sacrifice, pedophilia ring. We're not going to stop with that. We're going to cover that in a minute. But first. But first, you don't have to overhaul your whole life. You know, if you want to start with something simple like upgrading the snacks in your life in your pantry, the ones with real ingredients, like our friends at Masa, it's easy way to eat clean without feeling like you're on a diet. Masa chips contain just three ingredients. Organic corn, sea salt, and 100% grass fed beef tallow. There's no. That's it. There's no seed oil, nothing. No mystery chemicals, just real food. These chips, you know, don't only avoid all the bad stuff. They taste incredible. I absolutely love them. I love the. The white ones are some of my favorite. In fact, got them right Here in the studio. These are the white ones. These are, you know, similar. Like when you go to a good Mexican restaurant and you can tell that they just made them. Yeah, you know, that's. These are delicious. That's what these are. I love these. And I just ordered a couple new bags, by the way. You won't, you know, you won't find yourself, like, uncontrollably binging on these things because they're made with real food, so they're more satiating. Anyway, the original, the white, the blue, the lime, cabanero, churro style. Really fantastic. Give them a try. Go to masachips.com redacted news use the code redacted news for 25 off your first order or simply click the link in the description. Or you can scan that QR code on your screen. And if you don't feel like ordering them online, you can go to the Sprouts supermarket. They've got a bunch of them there. You can just go in and try a bag and see if you like them on your taco Tuesday night with salsa. They're absolutely delicious. Beef, tallow, corn and salt. Can't beat that. Masachips.com redactednews all right, well, if the.

Host 2 (15:24)

Epstein files don't make you motivated to secure your online life. Oh, what? Time out.

Guest 2 (15:30)

Oh, sorry.

Host 1 (15:30)

Sorry, I.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (15:31)

Go ahead.

Guest 2 (15:32)

Sorry, I thought you went on to the next. The next bit, the next piece, so.

Host 1 (15:37)

No.

Host 2 (15:37)

Okay, that's okay. Let's start this over again. I'd like to tell you about Webroot because. Yeah, you need to make sure that your digital life is locked down. You see how many bad guys are out there. The bad guys are looking into how to get into your data. Palantir. All of it. They want to track you. They want to sell you things, of course, but their power goes beyond that. So you need to have a rock solid security plan. That's why we'd like to tell you about Webroot. Webroot is an all in one solution. You can get virus protection against emerging threats like malware, ransomware, phishing scams, Firewell, firewall and network monitor. Plus web threat shield that detects and blocks malicious websites before you visit them. It works with Edge, Chrome, and Firefox. Plus a password manager and system organize optimizer to delete traces of your online activity. You can get family protection. It even includes your toddlers. You don't want them clicking something weird in their Roblox. And, oh, your whole family's hacked. So students or seniors and other dependents you get up to $1 million in expense reimbursement for stolen funds and out of pocket costs if in fact you are a victim of identity theft. Plus, Dark Web monitoring all of it. You can get all of that VPN for up to five devices hides your IP address, so check out what they have to offer. You can get 60% off their total protection package. Go to webroot.com redacted. Again, live a better digital life. And I'm sure it is on your New Year's resolutions to make sure that you are super protected online. If it's not, write it down and do it. Go to webroot.com redacted this is something Clayton and I actually do is we meet every quarter, go through like, okay, do we know everything that we've got? Everything's, you know, protected. Do we have backup protection if I get hit by a bus? How does Clayton get into that stuff? It just makes good sense, you guys. All right, let's talk about the collusion between the government and the media to cover up the Epstein files for decades. Decades. Let's start with the most obvious reason is that many of the people in the media in charge were friends with Epstein. And those people are still in power. Now, we know that because Barry Weiss, the new head of CBS News, is mentioned in the Epstein, Epstein files. Here is an email from Epstein to Nellie Bowles. Who is Nellie Bowles? Well, not only at the time was she a New York Times journalist having friendly little meetups. She is also married to Barry Weiss, the new head of CBS News. And she is one of the founders of the Free Paris, which CBS News just bought for millions and millions of dollars. So how do I put this mildly? The two of them are ideologically aligned with Jeffrey Epstein. They both have undying support for Israel. So it is perhaps curious that Nellie Bowles and Barry Weiss started dating in 2018. And after they met, look again at this email. Here's Epstein asking Bowles how it went, introducing her to your mom, your partner to your mom. I mean, unless she had another girlfriend besides Barry Weiss at the time, this is clearly in relationship to. To Nellie Bowles. And he asks her for a meeting. Want to hear all about it? She is enthusiastic in her response. Would love to. Oh, it's you. Yes, I'd love to. When's a good day? Can make it as soon as you want. Here's my address. Uh, again, at this point, she's a New York Times reporter. She would have known that he is a convicted sexual abuser. He would have known that. Because you know what? The New York Times did in fact cover it when he went to prison in 2008. Take a look at that. Now you may white ask, why did she circle the name of that reporter that's not Nellie Bowles? Because this dude Landon Thomas was also in the Epstein files. He covered Epstein's prison sentence in 2008. Fast forward to 2017. Here's an email from him to Epstein warning him that there's a journalist digging around about him. So how do you go from covering his sexual scandal to you're his chumps, you're his bud, so much so that you're going to warn him about any kind of hit on his public relations. And so now we have not only one, but two New York Times journalists friends with Epstein in a friendly manner, kind of first name basis, type of banter. Now, CBS has not responded to this connection, but since CBS bought the Free Press and Nellie Bowles is head of strategy and writes a column at the Free Press, that means c. CBS now has two reporters who were linked to Epstein relationships. Another CBS News connection was also in the files this weekend. Peter Attia, author of the book Outlive. He was named just last Tuesday. He's had a heck of a week as a correspondent, a medical correspondent for CBS News. Here's that convenient.

Host 1 (20:39)

Wait a minute.

Host 2 (20:40)

I didn't realize that it was last Tuesday.

Host 1 (20:41)

Oh, my gosh.

Host 2 (20:42)

January 27th.

Host 1 (20:43)

Getting them all in house.

Host 2 (20:45)

Right?

Host 1 (20:45)

Next up, Bill Barr is gonna be a contributor. You know, Alan Dershowitz. Like, they're all gonna be there.

Host 2 (20:51)

Yeah. I mean, was this coincidental? We don't know. Right. It's reasonable to ask. So now there are reports that CBS is gonna cut him loose because his emails to Epstein are extraordinarily unsavory. I won't show them to you. You can still search his name on the justice department website. He wrote this long explanation on X today. He says, you know, at the time, I was starstruck by his, like, fame and power. He says he never witnessed any abuse of women when they were talking about, like, ooh, a new shipment. They meant drugs. That's not better. He said that he was a drug.

Host 1 (21:30)

Trafficker, just not a child trafficker.

Host 2 (21:32)

He says, like, I helped him get metaphor because he's a doctor, but he's like, I'm not his. I'm not his doctor. But.

Host 1 (21:39)

So that's illegal, isn't it?

Host 2 (21:41)

I'm not. He doesn't specify exactly how he did that. You're not supposed to write. Yeah, So I don't.

Host 1 (21:46)

He's not his primary or doctor. Can you just write prescriptions for, like, right to his.

Host 2 (21:51)

I'm not. I'm not clear on that. He does say, I knew that he had been convicted of prostitution in 2008, and I thought that was the extent of it. He thought, that's. That's fine. Still should be friends with this guy. This is fine. It's fun to read the comments on that post because virtually no one is buying it now. The date of one of his emails is especially bad because in Outlive, I have read that book. Atia tells a story that his young infant son was having heart problems and was hospitalized for weeks. And his wife said, please come home from New York. We're in the icu, the baby's dying. And he refused. And he was in New York the whole time. Turns out he was in New York with Epstein while his baby was dying and refused to go home to San Diego to be with his wife and child. So that's especially bad. Now, again, there were. What? You're laughing. It's just beyond.

Host 1 (22:44)

Yeah, unbelievable. Like, I can't come home to my child who's dying.

Host 2 (22:48)

I gotta meet with Jeffrey Epstein.

Host 1 (22:50)

You know, I'm starstruck by Jeffrey Epstein. He invited me to his island or whatever.

Host 2 (22:53)

It's too fun here.

Host 1 (22:54)

You know, I've got to go there. And it was on the island.

Host 2 (22:56)

No, it was in New York City.

Host 1 (22:57)

Oh, it was in New York City.

Host 2 (22:58)

Yeah, it was in Manhattan.

Host 1 (22:59)

So, yeah, I just, you know, I want to be around him. Yeah. Sorry that my son is kind of. My child is dying.

Host 2 (23:04)

He may not live, but I'm living my best life.

Host 1 (23:07)

I'm living my best life. He's going to take me out to dinner.

Host 2 (23:10)

He does talk about optimizing your life. He really talks about how you shouldn't. You don't want to live till 80 if you live the marginal years, which means you're kind of in poor health and just living and existing and you can't thrive. So he really felt like that would marginalize his time if he went home to his wife and child. He needed to thrive and hang out with Jeffrey Epstein. So now we have two of America's most prestigious news outlets connected to Jeffrey Epstein and no explanation from either of them. That's the New York Times and CBS News. And you notice when you go to their website, what they're very focused on is whether or not Trump is in it with nobody else. And there are a lot of other. Yes, the Trump piece is big, and we've talked about that, but there's a lot else, a lot more there. And it's just a clear, like, look over there. We don't have to look at us.

Guest 1 (24:03)

Right.

Host 2 (24:04)

It is worth remembering when we talk about this media collusion, that in 2003, when Vanity Fair journalists Vicki Ward wrote this story for Vanity Fair, she interviewed Epstein and other victims, people who had alleged sexual assault, for her piece, and it never made it into that piece. This ended up looking more like a. Like a profile of an interesting dude. I mean, look at the headline. The talented Mr. Epstein. It still exists on the Internet. Researcher Daryl Cooper was recently on Tucker Carlson, and he told the story of how those accusations were edited out of the Vanity Fair piece. Watch.

Guest 1 (24:46)

And then right before it goes to press, Graydon Carter, who was running Vanity Fair at the time, he puts the kibosh on that part of the story. He just takes it out without even telling. Vicki Ward has all of that stuff removed. And it's just a. It's just a profile piece about Jeffrey Epstein, this international, minus the sexual assault allegations. Correct. And so the stories, though, where it gets really interesting. And again, this is told by not just war, but by a bunch of people who worked there at the time was the talk of the office at the time. They said he. He comes into his office one day. He's the first person in the office. Graydon Carter's office within the larger complex is blocked, but Jeffrey Epstein's already in there. He's the first person in, and he's waiting for him, and he berates him and threatens him and tells him, you know, you better not print this. And a short time later, he, Graydon Carter leaves his house in New York City and he finds a bullet on his stoop. And then a little while later, at his country house upstate, he finds a severed cat's head on the porch there. And according to the senior editor and a lot of people at Vanity Fair, Graydon Carter and everybody in the office knew exactly what this was.

Host 1 (25:59)

This was.

Guest 1 (25:59)

These were threats from Jeffrey Epstein, and Graydon Carter axed the story because of that.

Host 2 (26:04)

Okay, so, you know, as a journalist, I empathize with that. That had to been terrifying. Right? But there's two different pieces here. There's some, maybe journalists who are under duress and threat, and then we have others who are willingly friendly, associated Nellie Bowles and Landon Thomas. And so we don't know which of them were willingly complicit and which were threatened. We just don't know. Right. But what we should know is that we should have disclosure and not trust those people. Now, let's pivot quickly to the government conspiracy because it's worth remembering that every president since at least Bush and probably Clinton, too, has protected Epstein and his cohorts from punishment. Here is the Department of Justice saying, you know, yes, bad, but doesn't necessarily mean we need to prosecute somebody. Does that mean because of the statute of limitations that's still on them, they've had this for, in some cases, decades, and chose to let the statutes run out again. Epstein was indicted in a sweetheart deal under Bush. He was then let to go free and do more bad stuff under Obama. The Obama Justice Department was had total blinders, didn't even try to stop him. He was rearrested under Trump, then suddenly and mysteriously died and again ignored under Biden. You can't score. Squeeze this into a partisan lens. You just cannot. Let's focus again on. Go ahead, please.

Guest 2 (27:34)

But not only that, but just to mention that the prosecutor that let Epstein get off on that sweetheart deal ended up in the first Trump administration. Acosta. I can't remember his first name, but yeah, yeah, right.

Host 2 (27:48)

Ann Culture told a great story about how the prosecutor and actually, anyway, I don't want to. Let's not do an aside about partisan politics, because I'm specifically trying not to, because I think if this story doesn't break down your partisan loyalty, I don't know what will. Like, I literally don't know what to do with you. Okay, let's focus on what the government is currently saying about Epstein. Recall that just a few months ago, President Trump said this was all a hoax. Watch.

Host 1 (28:17)

I know you want to move past.

Host 2 (28:18)

All this intrigue over the Epstein files.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (28:19)

But I do want to ask you.

Host 2 (28:20)

To clarify something said this morning.

Host 1 (28:22)

You said this was all a hoax. Has your attorney general told you this was a hoax? What evidence. Have you seen the attorney general?

Guest 2 (28:28)

Now I know it's a hoax.

Host 1 (28:29)

It's started by Democrats. It's been run by the Democrats for four years. You had Christopher Wray and these characters and Comey before him.

Host 2 (28:38)

All right, Now, Attorney General Pam Bondi also had maintained that he never actually had clients. He only had child pornography on his computer. Here's the statement from last July. And she also said during a Cabinet meeting, he had no clients. He did sexually assault people, but only himself and no one else could be charged or investigated. Well, let's think that through, because if an everyday person had been exchanging emails like this, a lot of normies get prosecuted for this. This one. This is an email again, where someone says, I love the torture videos. And look, even if this person is not doing the torture, he has it on his phone. That is a crime. Possession, distribution, and knowing receipt of criminal material is enough for ordinary people. That's prosecuted every day. Parents have been charged or investigated because a minor child sends an image of themselves or something they saw that disturbed them in a group chat. If the child. If the parent receives it, they are liable and have been charged. Teenagers have been charged with possession or distribution, even if they themselves appeared in the photos. Adults have been arrested for unknowing possession where prosecutors argued they should have known that it was on a device. People have lost their jobs, reputations before trial just for being accused. So they're saying an email like this. Love the torture video. Someone had it, was sending it, knowingly responded to it. It's fine. We don't prosecute that. We don't prosecute those people about it. What about actually trafficking women here? Is this from an Italian banker? What do you want me to do? Should I do her or torture her? That you can search and find yourself. It's there. That sounds like Epstein had some clients to me. He's asking for what he should do to said woman. What does that sound like to you? Is there a reasonable explanation to that? This exchange so shows that Epstein was at least an arbiter of sexual encounters. This is about a woman. She's a model who calls herself an earth activist. Now, you can find her name. I won't put it out there, but this person's saying, yeah, I was with her last night. And these unsavory things that they say about here. So no clients, huh? And. And this person, he does seem to have found on his own, but Epstein saying, well, usually we try and get you the ones in the 20s. So it does sound like he's got a regular habit of getting this guy some girls. Sounds like that to me. So no clients, though, Right? So this is all stuff that the DOJ is saying. It's not prosecutable. It's all. It's all okay. You know, we see it. We're not gonna do anything about it. So do we trust the government or the media? And again, what we still don't have is information about his death. This is currently the government line.

Guest 1 (31:37)

He killed himself again.

Host 1 (31:39)

You want me to. I've. I've seen the whole file.

Host 2 (31:41)

He killed himself, okay.

Host 1 (31:44)

But thank God he's back.

Host 2 (31:47)

Oh, he's not. This is. That was from a while ago, but yeah, but FBI Director.

Host 1 (31:52)

I just meant thank God he's back on his show today. And.

Host 2 (31:55)

Oh, is today the day he's starting?

Host 1 (31:57)

And that's, as Kyle Seraphin pointed out, like, foul. Like, they hire. Apparently, allegedly. They hired, like, a bot farm to, like, come in and make it look like they had way more viewers than possible. And there it was, like a DDoS attack. And then it was pretty funny. Anyway, go ahead.

Host 2 (32:12)

Yeah, we'll just leave it at that. Because if you still don't think that there's deliberate collusion between the government and the media, I don't know. I can't prove it to you any further than that. This is pretty damning stuff.

Host 1 (32:24)

All right, well, remember a few weeks ago when Russian President Putin said the west is run by sick, satanic pedophiles who basically rape and torture children? And he said this in the west is the new normal. Watch.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (32:41)

Protein, aggressive, informati. Pakalini. Is rash.

Host 1 (33:24)

Yeah, that's the new norm.

Host 2 (33:25)

Maybe we want to prove him wrong and show we're outraged.

Host 1 (33:29)

No.

Host 2 (33:29)

Or we're just like, yeah, we do that. Here's the.

Host 1 (33:31)

No. And that's not the only time he said it. Of course, he's repeated it a number of times, and he's repeated. He's actually talked about some of the dark rituals that these elites in the west are, like, filling their bellies with flesh of humans. I mean, so this is not. We'll talk more about that in a second.

Host 2 (33:44)

Why don't they release some stuff? Since I'm sure the KGB knows some stuff.

Host 1 (33:47)

Oh, I'm sure they do.

Host 2 (33:48)

I'm sure they dump it on us.

Host 1 (33:50)

I'm sure they have plenty of it. We now know with certainty that the Department of Justice is hiding child torture videos, photos, huge batches of evidence related to child rape, torture and killings, pedophilia, all of it. Exactly. What. What Putin was talking about. This is not a conspiracy theory. But here's Todd Blanch specifically saying we're not going to release that information to you.

DOJ Representative (Todd Blanch) (34:14)

Any depiction of CSAM or child pornography was obviously excluded. Anything that would jeopardize an active federal investigation. And finally, anything that depicts or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury, also not produced.

Host 1 (34:32)

Yeah, so murder, torture, like, any of the kids that are tortured and all of that. Like, we're just gonna keep that from you. Okay. But we will release and redact, like, when Epstein is just, like, chasing young girls around his kitchen, trying to catch him for his little fun. Like this. This was released. So much fun.

Host 2 (35:11)

What is The Dark Book where they release people into the forest and hunt them. Joseph Conrad. Is that Heart of Darkness?

Host 1 (35:19)

Heart of Darkness, Yeah.

Host 2 (35:20)

Yeah, yeah. This is what this reminds me of.

Guest 2 (35:23)

And I just. Okay, so like, sorry, but if they. If they have this that they. That they are not releasing it. So they have it and they're saying, we won't release this to you, how is nothing prosecutable? How can they make those two claims?

Host 1 (35:35)

I don't know. And that's it is what it's.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (35:38)

Is the.

Guest 2 (35:39)

The argument what the only Epstein had it was just him. I mean, is that what their argument.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (35:43)

I just, I.

Guest 2 (35:44)

That's just.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (35:44)

I.

Guest 2 (35:45)

It's mind boggling to me beyond.

Host 1 (35:47)

Well, I mean. And you're thinking about. Of course. I mean, that's exactly what Massey said to me this morning on the phone, which is, these people are prosecutable. Why are these people. Why are these names being redacted? Why are these individuals being redacted that we could actually prosecute? So we did get some images of redacted sick photos found on Epstein's hard drive by one of his favorite male erotic photographers, Harold Seaward. In this photo released by the doj, we see two raw chickens with the photoshopped body of a male leg sticking up here. As you can see the leg there. And then this is the unredacted that we managed to get our hands on. And this is a photoshopped art piece by Harold Seward. So this isn't a real photo. You can see Harold Seward's time stamp there on the lower right hand corner of that image right there. Epstein enjoyed looking at it was found on his hard drive. Could you imagine? Like this is the type of stuff that you look at and you have it on your hard drive.

Host 2 (36:46)

But I mean, Tucker Carlson in that. In that Daryl Cooper interview did talk about how they had this. Like a lot of these circles have really dark demonic art in their house, hiding in plain sight. Well, even though I should correct myself, it was the Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell, not Heart of Darkness by Richard Connell.

Host 1 (37:05)

Okay.

Host 2 (37:05)

Yeah. Horrible book.

Host 1 (37:07)

I never read that. Remind me not to read it.

Host 2 (37:09)

Don't. Yeah, because we have this reality.

Host 1 (37:12)

You don't need to Hunger Games also.

Host 2 (37:14)

But, you know, kind of like that.

Host 1 (37:15)

Anyway, so here is Harold Seward. He is just. This is, you know, example of him. He's born in Germany, 1957, with all of his male erotic artwork found on. Found on Jeffrey Epstein's hard drive. Remember when Cash Patel lied before Congress about any of this? Watch.

DOJ Representative (Todd Blanch) (37:35)

There's no credible information. None.

Guest 1 (37:38)

If there were, I would bring the.

DOJ Representative (Todd Blanch) (37:39)

Case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information we have again is limited.

Guest 1 (37:45)

So the answer is no one for.

Host 1 (37:48)

The information that we have in the.

Guest 1 (37:51)

Files, in the case file.

Host 1 (37:52)

Okay, so all the. All the videos, all of the evidence, all of the emails that we are now going through that I just showed you. That we just showed you.

Host 2 (38:03)

Yeah.

Host 1 (38:05)

So you lie before Congress now. There's been calls today, a number growing chorus of Republicans calling for Cash Patel to resign or be fired. How long until he's out? He needs to go immediately. This guy. Of course this was a lie when he lied right to Congress. Cash Patel did. And even the New York Times admitted admits it. By the way, here's the New York Times. The government published dozens of nude photos in the Epstein files. The photos which showed young women, possibly teenagers, with their faces visible, largely removed after the New York Times began notifying the Justice Department over the weekend. So like the. Once again, this sort of collusion between the New York Times and the Justice Department running cover for them. Here's a quote. The Justice Department published doubles dozens of unredacted nude photos on its website showing young women, possibly teenagers, whose photos were contained in the files related to the wealthy sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. As part of its required disclosure, the Epstein files, the federal government was tasked with redacting both sexually explicit imagery and information that could be used to identify these victims. So don't worry. The New York Times call up the DOJ and told them, hey, get these things off the website like they're on there like evidence. So hide it. Get rid of it. We found it. Get off like you guys. I might want to pull that back a little bit. The people in the photos appear to be young, although it was unclear whether they were minors. Some of the images seemed to show Mr. Epstein's private island, including a beach. Others were taken in bedrooms and other private spaces. The release of these explicit photos comes after the government lawyers have scrambled for weeks, like giving them cover again to meet the requirements of the Epstein files transparency Act.

Host 2 (39:39)

Again, that's bullshit, right? They prosecuted Ghislaine, Maxwell and Epstein and had this redacted already.

Host 1 (39:46)

Exactly. So they suddenly had to do it because Massey. Oh, Massey. Now they again. This is the New York Times running cover for the doj.

Host 2 (39:55)

When we've proven two of their journalists.

Host 1 (39:58)

They have to scramble for weeks to meet the requirements. They had to scramble. I feel so bad for these DOJ lawyers who just had to scramble.

Host 2 (40:05)

All of a sudden I Mean they have the time because they're not prosecuting anybody.

Host 1 (40:10)

Among the most disturbing documents released on the Epstein files has to do with cannibalism, of course. This is an NYPD Detective Bureau document which is dated on August 2019. This is the from the new batch of documents. It says President George H.W. bush, according to this eyewitness, raped a male victim on a yacht where the victim also witnessed babies being dismembered while individuals ate. Then the entrails from their intestines. Let me just keep that up on the screen for a second. While on this yacht, he witnessed African American males having sex with white blonde females, all of whom were bleeding during the process. He was a victim of a type of ritualistic sacrifice in which his feet were cut with a scimitar but left no scarring. On the yacht he witnessed babies being dismembered. He also was raped by George Bush, the first. Unbelievable. So remember Putin's secret recent quote in an interview he did in March of 2024? The vampires bought is coming to an end. He said they've been stuffing their stomachs with human flesh and referring to elites in the West. They've been stuffing their stomachs with human flesh and they've been stuffing their pockets with money. But they must realize this ball of vampires is about to end. The movie hostel is true. Rich elites paying for torture, kill for sport, go to these resorts where you can do all of this. Then there's the mystery of Gabriella Rico Jimenez. Remember her? There she is on the right in 20. In 2009, the then 21 year old Mexican model was seen outside the Fiesta Inn in Monterrey, Mexico. Gabriella had attended a private party at the hotel. She was brought there by an elite modeling event brought together prominent businessmen, politicians, individuals whose names are all over the Epstein files by the way. So a direct connection to Epstein. She ran out of the hotel a few days later. She was screaming about what she saw inside. Watch. When she was describing the elites there smelling like human flesh after they eaten it. She was rambling on and on about these global elites satanic rituals and human sacrifices. She claimed world leaders were there, including former US President George. George W. Bush. By the way, Epstein had a nice painting of George W. Bush in his office with a little airplane like a paper airplane and Jenga blocks on the floor to resemble the Twin Towers. Like he was throwing this paper airplane as if he was the one that had knocked the towers down. Like you'd have that artwork in your house anyway, that they all took part in this ceremony. Eating children. Police took her away and claimed it was mental. A mental breakdown, by the way. She was never seen again. There's actually no hospital records. There's no evidence that she's anywhere. Gone, disappeared. No official statements, no trace of her. Even her family stayed totally silent on the story. Then there's Prince Andrew. And now the revelations that back in 1990s, Ghislaine Maxwell recruited a girl from a modeling career. And instead of modeling, she was sold as a slave for sex and torture. Prince Andrew was an accessory to her death as he tortured her. And me, according to this eyewitness and according to one of these victims. And forced murder. Forced her murder. And then these photos released in this batch over the weekend of Prince Andrew there on the floor with a young girl, presumably a young girl. Some people online like, he's probably just giving her cpr.

Host 2 (44:26)

And look at the person lounging in the back.

Host 1 (44:28)

There's a. Feet up on the desk. Feet up on the desk or feet up on the. Whatever it is. And then there's this nugget. Remember Isaac Cappy, who was killed shortly after he started exposing the elite pedophiles in Hollywood and the cannibal ring and all of this. And here's just a sampling of what Isaac Cappy started to post is pedophile.

Guest 2 (44:51)

Oh, I'm not gonna talk about Tom Hanks either, who is also a pedophile. There's this girl, Sarah Ruth Ashcraft on.

Host 1 (44:58)

Twitter, who has been accusing Tom Hanks of raping her when she was 13.

Guest 2 (45:03)

Her dad sold her to Tom Hanks.

Host 1 (45:05)

This is so rampant.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (45:06)

It is so, so, so bad. But watch for the symbolism.

Host 1 (45:13)

Yeah, so Isaac was killed. Of course, one of the last videos that he shared was a. Well, we can't show it here. I'm not going to show this video because I think YouTube will not allow us to show it here. Anyway, he released a video showing a. Basically a pedophile spa. In the video that he released shortly before he was killed, he referred to, I think one of these videos has like a death trigger video that if I die, I'm going to release this video showing, like, these small children being used at this as a, you know, at a spa, massage parlor. Then we learned in the Epstein files that in fact, this exact same spa, which. We're not going to show you the video of the children, Philip. So let's just show the actual promotional video of the spa that was in Turkey, the Rixos Antilia spa in Turkey, which was used for a recruitment center for young girls for Massage to then go to Epstein island and become basically personal masseuses for Epstein. This spa is a recruitment center where they would be sent and trained to get really, really good at their job and then be sent to Epstein island and two other places. Make sure they're good was the message. Basically, make sure they're. Make sure they're good at their job for Jeffrey Epstein. So again, I can't show. You can seek out the video online of the. The other part that I was telling you about, but YouTube will certainly not allow it. So I just want to. Plus, it's disturbing to see these young girls like that. And then there's the Bill Barr piece. And then there's so many more pieces of all of this. So for Cash Patel to sit there and say that none of this was happening. That, yeah, Bill Barr witnessing torture and abuse. Okay. He's also, by the way, the one that signed off, if you recall on that Epstein killed himself.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (47:00)

All.

Host 1 (47:01)

All evidence to the contrary. So we will continue to unpack this. We're going to look at many more angles of all of this because you can't just look at it at a 30,000 foot level. There's so many different pieces of this that we want to put together. And I think it's important, very important.

Host 2 (47:14)

I mean, is there anything else? There's. I saw someone in the chat room. No, I mean any other story. If this is the crux of all power centers and the reason that we have constant war, a bankrupt government, corrupt politicians who don't make decisions in our benefit. Is there anything else?

Host 1 (47:33)

By the way, is this also the reason why they just canceled and they have this emergency meeting at Mar A Lago today? Like, why did they suddenly cancel this, this meeting with Russia and Kiev? Why? And fly right down to Mar a Lago and the Treasury Secretary is there now. Like, again, why this emergency meeting out of the blue? We'll get more information about it. And is Cash Patel about to resign, about to be fired? And what about Pam Bondi? Multiple calls for this to happen. And that's why they're putting Todd Blanche out there so much as, you know, to run, perhaps cover for Pam Bondi. Anyway, there's a lot more we're going to unpack. We're going to talk about the Israel side of this, the Palantir side of this, the Ehud Barak side of this. The team over at Dropsite News has been doing a great job exposing that piece of it. So we're going to go into that in just a second. But first, I Don't know if you saw the volatility that's going on in the precious metals market. All those speculators and all of those leveraged bets who suddenly thought that, you know, the Trump China relationship was not going to go so well. So they bought all the silver and you know, try to basically tank the market. It didn't work. Friend of the show Mike Adams said, yeah, all these speculators like tried to tank the silver market. They brought it down to about $80 or whatever. I doubled up and went back in and bought as much as I could to get my hands on it because this is not going to stop. It's going to get much, much worse. And the demand for precious metals is off the charts right now. You see what's going on with copper, gold, silver, all of it. Because we are no longer in a unipolar world. We are separating ourselves into a multipolar world. So we are big believers in making sure that you have precious metals in your portfolio. I don't care how you do it, I don't care if you go to Costco and pick something up or whatever you do. Just make sure that your future is not tied to the US dollar. President Trump, Scott Bessant, the new head of the Federal Reserve that's going to have to go through the confirmation hearing is of course Kevin Warsh. He absolutely wants a weaker US dollar. That's what they want, a weaker US currency to compete with China and India for exports. That's what's coming. So if your family's future is tied to US dollars, please, please, please take heed right now and really start to think about how your family is protected in the long term. Again, I don't care how you do it, I really don't. But our friends at Lear Capital have been helping us for years. They have been supporting us. And this is where we have, we have IRA set up with our families through, through Lear to make sure that when we buy precious metals, it's held inside of a self directed IRA which can grow tax free. Many of our viewers will buy gold coins or silver coins directly from Lear and have it shipped right to your house. You can do that. You can have it also stored in an off site facility that's under 100 protect, protection from guards, you know, 100 it's a, in a vault and protected in Delaware. That's totally up to you. I know some of our viewers like to just have it in a big gun safe in their house and they protect it again. You do you, it's Totally up to you. But they are a fantastic American company that will help you learn how to start doing this. Just get on the phone and have a no obligation phone call with them. Just talk to them. Just call them 1-800-613-3557 and ask them to get their free free gold guide right now because they just revised their guide. They initially had a silver guide showing was going to hit of hundreds an ounce. They now have their Revised guide hitting $150 an ounce for silver. So ask them to send that to you for free. Go to or just go to leardacted.com the website is learn and you can receive up to $20,000 in free bonus medals with a qualified purchase. Again, tell them you heard them from us and they've been longtime supporters of ours. Again, a great American company.

Host 2 (51:07)

We also want to tell you about our friends over at American Financing because interest rates are in fact coming down. So it's a good time to think about leveraging your assets. Now if you have had a hard time and struggled during this constant inflation, inflation, inflation and devaluing of the US Dollar, well, you don't want to live your life on credit cards and continue to dig yourself into the red. Why not dig yourself out of the red and be able to build wealth instead of just live on debt? That's what American Financing can teach you. If you are a home homeowner, they can teach you how to leverage the equity in your home in order to use that money, it is yours after all. And build yourself and dig out of the red so they can have finance consultants who will look over your finances and let you know if this works for you or not. And it's a skill. Leveraging your wealth is and your assets is a skill that wealthy people learn, but most of us don't. So we have to teach ourselves. Go to american financing.net or you can call 866-890-8434 today. Once again, that's american financing.netacted and again, learn to leverage your assets. You guys, you can't build wealth if you don't know how to do that. So just take the time to learn this new year, new thing. Give it a shot. Call them up. 866-890-8434.

Host 1 (52:27)

Now to the Israel Epstein connection. Mossad, CIA and all of it. As Ehud Barak was leaving office as a government service in Israel, he turned to Jeffrey Epstein for guidance. And imagine sitting there recording the entire conversation, which is exactly what happened. Epstein told him at the time he Needed to look at a Peter Thiel company named Palantir. Rare audio of Epstein and Barack Ehud. Barack from this latest DOJ Epstein release. It has been released. Listen to Ehud Barak being instructed by Jeffrey Epstein about Palantir.

DOJ Representative (Todd Blanch) (53:06)

He thought there was two cyber companies.

Host 1 (53:08)

Look out.

DOJ Representative (Todd Blanch) (53:09)

And even though I know Peter, I've never met Peter Thiel. And everybody says he sort of jumps around and acts strange, like he's on drugs.

Guest 1 (53:18)

Smoking.

Host 1 (53:19)

Yeah, he looks under drugs.

DOJ Representative (Todd Blanch) (53:22)

However, he has a company called Palantir. P A L L E N T E T I E R Palantir's Peter Thiel's company.

Host 1 (53:33)

And look at Palantir.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (53:34)

P A L A N T I E L yes.

Host 1 (53:40)

So Epstein and Palantir's CEO Peter Thiel were also discussing a plan that would basically destroy Iraq, Libya, Syria, Palestine, Lebanon, Egypt, basically all for the sake of Israel. As I'm reading this wrong, it's clear they both worked for Mossad. When you read this email, the intentionality argument would certainly would center on making sure the US gets less involved with the rest of the world. I think that's the plan. The more of a mess it is with just lots of bad guys on different sides, the less we do. He says, I keep hearing your intentionality argument. Imagine if this mess is what Obama really wanted. Iraq, Iran's, Libya, Syria, Palestine, Lebanon, Egypt. We would have to omit a strategy that was brilliantly executed. So much to unpack here. The team at Dropsite News has been doing an incredible job unpacking this angle of the story. Murtaza Hussain is a journalist at Dropsite News and joins us now. Murtaza, great to have you back on the show. Welcome back.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (54:40)

Thanks for having me, guys.

Host 1 (54:42)

So just at a high level, when you sort of are sorting through all of this, what are you seeing that is further confirmation of this Israel, Epstein, Mossad, CIA cabal connection here?

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (54:56)

Yeah. So as we talked about last time, Raptor has been doing this ongoing series of investigations on the connection between Epstein and the Israeli government and Israeli security services and is really private firms tied to the security services which are very heavily involved in the tech sector and tech surveillance and so forth. Epstein was a very critical knowledge that. Now, you know, this email dump is very interesting because there was a tremendous number of documents dumped and in typical fashion, they weren't dumped in a way which made them extremely accessible. They kind of were released in a very chaotic fashion. And my understanding is about 3 million documents were released. But that document releases only about half of what the DOJ is said to have. So there should be another 3 million or so files and documents related to Epstein that the DOJ has in possession. And think Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie and a few others have brought that up. So, you know, whatever we've seen right now, and I saw you guys were reading some of the really egregious sort of allegations that were in some of these emails and correspondence in some of them, you know, that's still maybe just the tip of the iceberg, to be honest, because whatever they saw fit to release this and not the other 3 million, which we don't have any schedule or time frame to see. So, you know, I'll tell you that our previous stories were based on the very, very limited Epstein file releases that had happened beforehand, but also some involuntary releases that took. Because some hackers online had hacked former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and hacked one of Epstein's old inboxes for a certain time period. And then we were able to see this very voluminous and far reaching relationship that Epstein evidently had with not just Barak, but a wide range of figures and institutions in the Israeli political and security establishment. He was a very critical note in all of that. And you know, I've said this many times, people ask me, you know, was Epstein a Mossad agent per se? I think that in reality his stature and the role he played was in many ways far above that. If you look at his conversations with Barak, who at this time was one of the most influential people in the Israeli political security establishment, he had been the prime minister, he was the defense minister during part of their conversations. He was really looking up to Epstein. He was looking up to Epstein for help. He was trying to get his attention. The power dynamic was very quite discernible in their interactions. So it was really Epstein was kind of above, you know, any institution like that per se. But they were, he was a resource and a critical node that they actually relied on for connections and help and for money and political purposes and to spread their influence globally and so forth. So I suspect that these files, which, you know, again, we haven't had a chance to go through in great granularity and really to get extract the true meaning out of them does take some time to kind of put them chronologically together and see what the meaning of all the conversations were in context. But I do suspect that they will point more of this. Now I have been looking at that conversation you referenced earlier with Barack and a third figure who, you know, we have some theories of who it is, but we're not have. We'll not share them yet. But I think someone. People probably know very well. You know, I do think that points to even more detail about what Epstein was doing. And I think the one thing about these documents is that they're going to help us do a lot more stories about this Israel connection soon because they filled in the gaps from some of the things that we weren't able to nail down before. And I think we'll see a lot more stories about Epstein's influence through Israel in many countries around the world, including in many countries in Africa, Central Asia and obviously in Europe and North America and Russia as well.

Host 2 (58:27)

And what do you make of him sort of filling in Eliud Barak about it? Why does he need to know this if they're, you know, if Palantir is going to do what they're going to do, he needs him to know about Peter Thiel. Like, why bring this guy who is legacy leadership in on this if they're just going to like, why I'm asking you to guess.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (58:48)

Yeah, well, you know, it's funny because at this time, you know, Ehud Barak was leaving public service and in Israel and like many countries, when politicians leave public service, they want to try to leverage the access they got in office to make a lot of money. And in making a lot of money, often still pursue the same political goals that they did in office or whatever ideological rules they had, but try to make money as a private citizen in tandem with that. So what Epstein was doing for Barack at this time, was he helping build him up as this tech security mogul? And as you can tell, Barack didn't even know what Palantir was at that time. So he probably didn't really have that much of a background in the field. He was someone who's focused. He was a defense minister and so forth. He was a professional soldier at one point in his life.

Host 1 (59:37)

And politics also, to be fair, right. Most people didn't know what Palantir was at that point. They had really just kind of secured their, like CIA funding at that point, which. You know what I mean? So, like, most, most people didn't know about it. And here he is speaking about it as if he has like some sort of CIA insider knowledge, passing this on to Ehud Barak.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (59:57)

Yeah, it's very notable for that reason, you're right. And, you know, one thing that I've seen in these email archives, archives and some of the other leaked archives that have come out over the past year or so and has been reported by a few Other places, smaller outlets as well too, is that Palantir, sometime around this period, was attempting to hire the Israeli ambassador to the UN directly out of his role at the un, Ron Prosor. So, you know, there was some very intimate relationship between the Israeli political establishment, security establishment, with this company, which as you mentioned, also has ties to the American intelligence establishment. So Epstein's interest in it is not surprising to me in a way because he was very invested and interested in this idea of surveillance technology. And he was a very intelligent and forward thinking man in some ways, in the sense that he was plugged into all these networks and he was trying to shape the technological environment that we would see in the years to come through his access to intelligence resources and also the money he could draw upon. So another story we did was actually his work with, trying to work with Ariana Rothschild, the Rothschild private bank, to fund these surveillance technology, cyber weapons firms in Israel. So he would have been plugged into Palantir. He was someone who would have been kind of aware of Palantir beforehand because of the networks he was embedded into. And it does raise troubling questions because obviously Palantir has this tremendous political influence today. It's embedded in so many of our systems in the United States. And one wonders what were the ideological inclinations of the people who found the company and run it, what connections it had with foreign countries, in this case, of course, Israel. And what was Epstein's real role, if any, in the infancy of the company as it started to develop over the past decade and a half? I think those questions are all being piqued further by these disclosures.

Host 1 (61:48)

And also as Dropsight's been reporting too, we see that he basically was being used as a direct role in fostering like these ties between India, Israeli and US elites and putting all of this together.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (62:04)

Well, you know, it's really interesting because I think it reveals something about the world that we live in and the way that it actually functions. I think in the 20th century we developed this for a time, very valid view that certain institutions would mediate amongst one another and that's how power operated and that's how deals were done between nations and so forth. And that was true for a time, probably until the end of the Cold War. But since then we had this change in the way that elites operate in the sense that they've really demoted the importance of its formal institutions and including democratic institutions that you and I would have some visibility into. And now they operate very much in these private networks of individuals. So Jeffrey Epstein was Obviously not someone any of us elected. He was not someone who had, we couldn't foia his communications. He didn't work for us officially in any way as American citizens. But he was someone who still had his authority and power to basically engage in diplomacy for whoever he wanted, whether that was America or Israel or the UAE or Russia or whoever else. He was an extremely powerful private figure who operated outside and above any institution. And when you see, we did a story the other day, published it, about his role in fostering Israel, India, US Trilateral diplomacy, it's not something that we had a say in or that we knew anything about, or maybe we didn't agree with parts of it, but it was happening. And he's become emblematic of the sort of freelance operator who is the byproduct of an age where our actual ability to express our own opinions and have insight into the way the government operates through institutions is greatly diminish. Instead, we live in the world of these networks, people like Epstein who are very powerful. And you know, as you pointed out in your preamble as well, too, this privacy and lack of transparency and combined with power that they enjoy also tends to lend itself to these horrible abuses because they start thinking that they're really above everybody else.

Host 2 (64:03)

Right.

Host 1 (64:04)

Murtaza, thank you for your great work on this and give our thanks to your team over at Dropsite for staying on this and breaking a lot of these stories before we even got the DOJ document dump. So we'll see if Massie and Ro Khanna can get the other 3 million documents here to put these other pieces together that are still missing. So thank you so much for your work on this and thanks for joining us. We really appreciate it.

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (64:26)

Thanks both for having me.

Host 1 (64:27)

You bet. Wow. There's so much more. And of course, we're going to dive more deeply into something that Murtaza talked about on the show. We're going to talk about that later this week. We're going to talk about the Rothschilds piece of this, the banking cabal piece of this. Also, David Icke is going to be joining us here on the show tomorrow. We're going to do a deep dive with David Icke specifically on this pedophilia satanic ring. He even tweeted today, he said, you know, was Epstein controlling this, like, you know, massive pedophilia ring? And no, he was not. He was a piece of it. He was a Mossad CIA asset. As a piece of the pedophilia satanic ring is way bigger. Way bigger. And you can look to Ukraine. You can see all of these pieces of it. So we're gonna have David Icke here on the show tomorrow to talk about that. Very excited about that.

Host 2 (65:13)

Well, I mean, that's the crux of it, right? Is like, who's still doing this? Are we supposed to be like, whew, I'm glad that doesn't happen anymore. I feel good. Right. If you feel that way, I'd again like that. It's a naivete.

Host 1 (65:27)

Well, the organ harvesting that's happening right now in Canada, the organ harvesting and the satanic ritualistic killing of individuals in Ukraine on the horrible stuff that they're doing with people in Ukraine and children in Ukraine. I mean, Ukraine has become in many ways like a baby making factory. I mean, women kept in these rooms and then these children sold off for tens of thousands of dollars to Western elites. It's all happening right now. Right now. And by the way, it's happening in the United States right now at a huge level. And it's infuriating. Go ahead, Phil.

Guest 2 (65:59)

I was being, I was just going to say, like.

Host 1 (66:01)

And there's also the 350,000 plus children.

Guest 2 (66:04)

Missing from the border still.

Host 1 (66:05)

And that, you know, that all played into this.

Host 2 (66:07)

Yeah, sure, sure.

Host 1 (66:08)

Well, yeah. And yeah, these operations that we're still trying to unpack and shed light on in the United States, I mean, these operations where these flights are literally flying out of the United States to foreign countries as we speak, and children being trafficked into Western elites here in the United States, it's all happening so well. We got more.

Guest 2 (66:27)

And like, you know that, you know that it's, it's still ongoing because they're still trying to protect people.

Host 2 (66:34)

Right.

Guest 2 (66:34)

If it was just Epstein, if this was just a one off, if he was just a sick bastard and that was it, then we'd be, we'd be done with it, wouldn't we? But they're still. Well, why are there. Who are they trying to protect? Because it's still ongoing.

Host 1 (66:46)

Yeah, got a few super chats here to quickly get through. I live in the Pacific Northwest where chopped feet were washing on shore along the coast.

Host 2 (66:54)

Oh my gosh.

Host 1 (66:55)

Chili Pepper says that five dollar super chat. There's also Hard Target starring John Claude Van Damme. Oh, another one. Yeah, there you go.

Host 2 (67:05)

Like a Heart of Darkness. Yeah, yeah, the most.

Host 1 (67:08)

Well, like a hostel, like. And by the way, Eyes Wide Shut, there's another piece of this we're going to be covering here, this whole Eyes Wide Shut piece with, with Stanley Kubrick, of course. Who? His last film where he was of course exposing the elite pedophile ring in this film. That's the whole point. The studio said you got to remove the pedophile stuff. You got to remove it. You got to remove it, you got to remove it. And he refused. And then suddenly he's dead. And so what happened to that original version of that film? We never saw it. The version that we saw was the re edited, totally changed version of the film. And of course Stanley Kubrick died. So he was exposing this massive child pedophilia ring inside of Hollywood. Same thing that Jim Carrey has talked about during his awards ceremony speech about the selling of children and the trafficking of children in Hollywood. What Jim Caviezel has laid out. So Mel Gibson. Mel Gibson.

Host 2 (68:01)

Yeah.

Host 1 (68:02)

All right. Well, we are going to be back tomorrow, 4pm Eastern Time. And do you want to tell them about the newsletter?

Journalist (Murtaza Hussain) (68:07)

Oh, yeah.

Host 2 (68:07)

You should subscribe to the the newsletter if you please. It is totally free. Head on over to redacted.inc. this is something we write as a companion piece to the show. So I try really hard to make sure that you're linked to original source material. So there's nothing behind a paywall. There's no upsell or cross sell. We just want you to have resources that are kind of easy to get through. Plus, you know, you'll learn our take on something. You are never required to agree with us. We like to have have a real conversation with our viewers. We are lifelong learners and free speech activists. So we're willing to hear everybody's opinion. So please do subscribe. Go to redacted.inc. and put in your email address and you'll be so happy you did and so will I because we work really hard on it on this show.

Host 1 (68:52)

Indeed we will.

Guest 1 (68:53)

Yeah.

Host 1 (68:54)

So G. Fontes says a lot of those 350,000 missing, 145,000 formerly miss saying minor migrant children have been recovered.

Host 2 (69:05)

According to the press release. Yeah.

Host 1 (69:08)

So who's going to be able to fact check that? We'd like to thank you guys so much for watching. Thanks for subscribing and being a part of our show here. And we'll be back here at 4pM Eastern time tomorrow. Have a great night, everyone.