Redacted News: SHOCKER! Trump's Latest Would-Be ASSASSIN Has Ukraine Connections, Real ID Backlash

Release Date: April 15, 2025
Hosts: Natali and Clayton Morris
Guests: Harrison Berger (Independent Journalist), Lionel (Lionel Nation), Tom Fitton (Judicial Watch)

Overview

In this riveting episode of Redacted News, hosts Natali and Clayton Morris delve into a series of explosive topics that challenge mainstream narratives. From a disturbing assassination plot against former President Donald Trump with alleged Ukraine connections to the contentious rollout of Real ID, the episode promises a thorough examination of issues often overlooked by mainstream media. Additionally, the hosts scrutinize the authenticity of a high-profile female space mission and explore the fairness of Harvey Weinstein's retrial, culminating in a discussion on the pursuit of transparency regarding Jeffrey Epstein's files.

The Would-Be Assassin Plot Against Trump

Timestamp: [00:00] – [13:56]

Clayton Morris leads the discussion on a chilling case involving Nikita Kassip, a 17-year-old who allegedly plotted to assassinate Donald Trump with foreign assistance. He criticizes the mainstream media's lack of coverage, emphasizing the purported Ukraine connections.

• Clayton Morris states, “[...] Nikita Kassip was actively carrying this out. [...] to carry out the murder of Donald Trump” ([04:30]).

• The hosts highlight that Kassip had foreign contacts in Ukraine who allegedly helped him “figure out how to build a bomb-dropping drone” ([05:10]).

• Clayton questions the media's silence: “Why isn't this the biggest story in mainstream media?” ([05:25]).

• They draw parallels to previous assassination attempts, such as Ryan Routh, suggesting a pattern of Ukrainian involvement ([09:11]).

• Natalie Morris adds, “We keep hearing, just wait. The plan is coming together” ([10:08]).

The segment underscores concerns about foreign interference and the possible underreporting of serious threats against political figures.

Real ID Backlash

Timestamp: [24:23] – [33:05]

The discussion shifts to the implementation of Real ID, a government initiative perceived as an extension of the Patriot Act, raising alarms about increased surveillance and privacy violations.

• Kristi Noem, Homeland Security Secretary, delivers a public service announcement promoting Real ID ([24:45]).

• Tinida Gates (likely a fictional guest) argues, “It's essentially trying to do the same thing, more government surveillance and control over Americans” ([27:10]).

• The hosts and guest debate the implications of Real ID on privacy, likening it to steps toward a controlled digital identity and potential central bank digital currency ([28:19]).

• Melinda Gates contends, “This is a holdover from the Patriot Act” and criticizes the erosion of Fourth Amendment protections ([27:10]).

• The conversation explores the conflict between state rights and federal mandates, questioning the necessity and consequences of such identification systems ([29:39]).

This segment reflects deep skepticism about government overreach and the potential loss of personal freedoms through mandated identification systems.

Female Space Crew Authenticity

Timestamp: [13:56] – [22:45]

Natali and Clayton scrutinize the recent Blue Origin mission featuring an all-female crew, raising doubts about its authenticity and underlying motives.

• Natali Morris questions the mission's legitimacy, noting inconsistencies in footage and behavior of the crew ([14:24]).

• They analyze the sequence where crew members open the capsule door, only to have Jeff Bezos intervene with a wrench, suggesting it may have been staged for PR purposes ([15:51]).

• Natalie Morris criticizes the portrayal of female astronauts, expressing concerns about the messages being sent to young girls regarding feminism and motherhood ([18:23]).

• The hosts mock the authenticity of interactions during the mission, highlighting moments that appear scripted or unnatural ([17:33]).

• Lionel humorously remarks, “What happens when she goes on a roller coaster? She's like, I really want to become an engineer and a physicist” ([21:16]).

The discussion conveys a skeptical view of corporate-sponsored space missions, suggesting they may prioritize image over genuine scientific advancement.

Harvey Weinstein's Retrial

Timestamp: [33:08] – [43:48]

The episode delves into the controversial retrial of Harvey Weinstein, questioning the fairness of the legal proceedings and the influence of the MeToo movement.

• Lionel, a constitutional expert from Lionel Nation, explains the basis for overturning Weinstein's conviction, focusing on the misuse of similar fact evidence ([35:44]).

• Kristi Noem outlines legal standards, arguing that prior misconduct should not prejudice the current trial ([35:37]).

• Lionel emphasizes the importance of a fair trial, stating, “You have to identify the body, you have to identify the deceased” and criticizes the potential bias jurors may hold ([39:23]).

• Natali Morris raises concerns about the manipulation of public opinion through the MeToo movement, questioning who benefits from such high-profile cases ([39:44]).

• Clayton Morris highlights the media's role in shaping perceptions, noting the lack of unbiased coverage ([43:07]).

This segment raises critical questions about judicial impartiality, the potential for media influence on legal outcomes, and the broader implications for social justice movements.

Jeffrey Epstein Files and Judicial Watch Lawsuit

Timestamp: [43:49] – [56:44]

Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch discusses the organization's lawsuit against the Department of Justice to obtain the elusive Jeffrey Epstein files, advocating for transparency and accountability.

• Tom Fitton explains the motive behind the lawsuit, emphasizing the need for public reassurance through FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests ([44:50]).

• He highlights potential government obstruction, stating, “The deep state is secrecy, so everyone doesn't want it to come out” ([48:01]).

• Clayton Morris probes the possible contents of the files, referencing terabytes of video evidence from Epstein's properties ([52:38]).

• Tom Fitton underscores the significance of Epstein's connections, questioning what the released documents might reveal about influential individuals’ involvement ([49:24]).

• The hosts express concern over Epstein's mysterious death and the handling of his case, suggesting deeper governmental complicity ([53:34]).

• Lionel adds intrigue by expressing interest in potential prosecutorial misconduct related to Epstein's case ([56:04]).

This portion of the episode underscores the ongoing quest for truth surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, the challenges of accessing pivotal information, and the broader implications for political and social elites.

Conclusion

The Redacted News episode effectively unpacks a series of high-stakes issues, blending investigative discussions with pointed critiques of mainstream media and governmental actions. By incorporating expert opinions and direct quotes, the hosts provide a comprehensive analysis aimed at uncovering hidden truths and prompting listeners to question widely accepted narratives.

Notable Quotes

• Clayton Morris: “Why isn't this the biggest story in mainstream media?” ([05:25])

• Kristi Noem: “Get a real ID. Starting May 7, you will need a real ID to travel by air or to visit federal buildings in the United States.” ([24:45])

• Melinda Gates: “This is written by the same authors, which makes sense because it's essentially trying to do the same thing, more government surveillance and control over Americans.” ([27:10])

• Tom Fitton: “The deep state is secrecy, so everyone doesn't want it to come out.” ([48:01])

• Lionel: “What happens when she goes on a roller coaster? She's like, I really want to become an engineer and a physicist.” ([21:16])

This detailed summary encapsulates the essence of the episode, highlighting the critical discussions and providing context for each major topic covered by Redacted News. Whether scrutinizing political assassination plots, government surveillance measures, or high-profile legal cases, the hosts strive to present a narrative that challenges listeners to seek deeper understanding beyond mainstream portrayals.