"STOP WHINING!" China slams Trump after new 245% Tariff War explodes, Xi ready to talk? | Redacted

Summary

Redacted News - Episode Summary: "STOP WHINING!"

Release Date: April 16, 2025
Hosts: Clayton Morris & Natalie Morris

---

1. Introduction

In this episode of Redacted News, hosts Clayton and Natalie Morris delve into a series of critical and provocative topics that mainstream media often overlooks. From groundbreaking government admissions to escalating international trade tensions, the episode offers a comprehensive analysis of events shaping our world. Key discussions include the White House's revelation of advanced time and space manipulation technologies, the intensifying US-China trade war, Ukraine's political maneuvers, a concerning rise in autism rates, a landmark UK Supreme Court ruling on gender definitions, and accusations of real estate fraud against New York Attorney General Letitia James.

---

2. White House Admission: Manipulation of Time and Space

Timestamp: 00:04 – 05:58

Clayton Morris opens the episode with a bombshell revelation: the White House has officially acknowledged that the United States possesses technology capable of manipulating time and space. This includes quantum teleportation technology, which allows for the instantaneous transportation of large military crafts.

• Clayton Morris (00:04):
  "We're hearing from people inside the government about what technologies the United States actually possesses."

The hosts reference the disappearance of Malaysian Flight MH370 as an example of this technology in action, suggesting that the plane was "teleported out of the sky." They play clips from General Stephen Kwast and Michael Kuriatsas, highlighting the military's advanced capabilities.

• General Stephen Kwast (03:34):
  "The technology can be built today with technology that is not developmental to deliver any human being from any place on planet Earth to any other place in less than an hour."

• Michael Kuriatsas (04:59):
  "We possess the technology that can manipulate time and space... causing us to grow and improve productivity."

Natalie shares an anecdote illustrating the everyday implications of teleportation technology, expressing skepticism from others about its existence.

Key Insight:
The admission of such advanced technologies suggests a significant undercurrent of undisclosed scientific capabilities within the US government, raising questions about transparency and potential future applications.

---

3. Escalation of the US-China Trade War

Timestamp: 07:35 – 19:14

The conversation shifts to the escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. President Trump has imposed a staggering 245% tariff on various Chinese goods, prompting strong backlash from China, which has retaliated with export bans on tech metals.

• Natalie Morris (15:27):
  "China wants Trump to just accept the tariffs... But Trump will not."

• Clayton Morris (18:25):
  "They are feeling the squeeze too."

The hosts detail the specific tariffs, highlighting the inconsistency and high rates applied to everyday items like syringes, lithium-ion batteries, and even wool sweaters. They discuss the immediate economic fallout, including a sharp drop in Nvidia's stock and a significant decline in the Nasdaq index.

Key Insight:
The aggressive tariff strategy is creating economic instability and uncertainty, with both nations experiencing adverse effects. China's willingness to negotiate may indicate an opening for de-escalation, but the unpredictability of tariff implementations keeps tensions high.

---

4. Ukraine's Political Landscape and Zelensky's Actions

Timestamp: 19:20 – 28:52

Ukraine's President Vladimir Zelensky has extended martial law for an additional three months, postponing the planned presidential elections. This move has sparked concerns about Zelensky's intentions and the influence of external forces, particularly the CIA and US involvement.

• Drew Berquist (20:38):
  "This is going to continue in perpetuity because it's so good for Zelensky."

• Natalie Morris (23:46):
  "Why do we listen to this hypocrite?"

Clayton and Natalie criticize Zelensky for hiring mercenaries while condemning Russian mercenaries, suggesting hypocrisy and undermining Ukraine's credibility. They explore the potential consequences of these actions, including prolonged conflict and increased instability in the region.

Key Insight:
Zelensky's extension of martial law and reliance on mercenaries may indicate deeper political manipulation and a reluctance to hold fair elections, raising questions about Ukraine's sovereignty and the true motives behind prolonged conflict.

---

5. CDC Report on Autism Rates and RFK Jr.'s Commentary

Timestamp: 48:26 – 71:09

A new report from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reveals a significant increase in autism rates, now affecting 1 in 31 children in the United States—a 16.1% rise since the last assessment. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. addresses this concerning trend, challenging those who dismiss the epidemic by labeling them as "epidemic deniers."

• RFK Jr. (63:06 – 66:30):
  "The baseline for autism in this country was established with a study finding 0.7% of children had autism... Today we're 1 in 31. That study also confirmed the 4 to 1 male to female ratio."

Natalie and Clayton discuss possible environmental factors contributing to the rise, such as heavy metals and pollution, contrasting these with lower autism rates in isolated communities like the Amish.

Key Insight:
The dramatic increase in autism diagnoses underscores the urgent need for comprehensive research into environmental and genetic factors. RFK Jr.'s stance highlights a divide in public perception and the push for more transparent investigation into potential causes.

---

6. UK Supreme Court Ruling on Gender Definitions

Timestamp: 52:07 – 59:57

A landmark decision by the UK Supreme Court has declared that the terms "woman" and "sex" in the 2010 Equality Act refer exclusively to biological sex, not self-identified gender. This ruling has significant implications for gender identity laws and the rights of transgender individuals.

• Lois McClatchy Miller (52:07 – 59:26):
  "A woman is somebody who is defined by biological sex... safe spaces, locker rooms, changing rooms, sports teams... It's about protecting opportunities, dignity, and safety for females."

Clayton and Natalie express strong support for the ruling, emphasizing its importance in protecting women's spaces and opportunities. They discuss the potential global impact, hoping other countries may follow the UK's lead in defining gender based on biological sex.

Key Insight:
This ruling represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over gender identity, balancing anti-discrimination protections with the preservation of women's rights and safe spaces. It sets a legal precedent that may influence similar cases worldwide.

---

7. Accusations Against Letitia James for Real Estate Fraud

Timestamp: 34:44 – 37:39

New York Attorney General Letitia James faces serious allegations of real estate fraud. Former congressional candidate Mike Sappra Cohn has filed a criminal referral accusing James of inflating the value of her Brooklyn brownstone to secure favorable mortgage rates.

• Natalie Morris (34:07):
  "Letitia James lied about the value of her own multimillion-dollar Brooklyn brownstone house, saying it was worth only $250,000 when comparable properties were selling for over $2 million."

The hosts draw parallels between James's actions and the accusations previously leveled against Donald Trump, highlighting perceived hypocrisy and the potential for significant legal consequences.

Key Insight:
These allegations against Letitia James not only tarnish her reputation but also raise broader questions about accountability and integrity within high-ranking public officials, especially those who have previously targeted others for misconduct.

---

8. Critique of Female Astronauts' Spaceflight

Timestamp: 37:39 – 47:01

The episode critiques a recent spaceflight involving female astronauts, questioning the validity and significance of their purported research. Clayton and Natalie express skepticism over claims that the four-minute flight conducted by women contributed meaningful scientific data.

• Natalie Morris (39:08):
  "They took their seatbelts off and on to descend. So it would be shameless to call yourself an astronaut, given these rules."

Philip, a guest with a molecular biology background, supports the skepticism, suggesting that meaningful research cannot be conducted in such a brief period.

Key Insight:
The hosts argue that the spaceflight's portrayal as a scientific endeavor lacks substantive evidence, questioning the motives behind promoting such missions and the authenticity of claimed research outcomes.

---

9. Conclusion and Upcoming Topics

As the episode wraps up, Clayton and Natalie promote upcoming discussions, including a deeper dive into the White House's time and space technologies with guest Ashton Forbes. They also touch upon other significant issues like Letitia James's legal troubles, the rise in autism rates, and the UK Supreme Court's gender definition ruling.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Clayton Morris (00:04):
  "We're hearing from people inside the government about what technologies the United States actually possesses."

• General Stephen Kwast (03:34):
  "This technology can be built today... to deliver any human being from any place on planet Earth to any other place in less than an hour."

• Natalie Morris (15:27):
  "China wants Trump to just accept the tariffs... But Trump will not."

• Drew Berquist (20:38):
  "This is going to continue in perpetuity because it's so good for Zelensky."

• RFK Jr. (63:06):
  "Today we're 1 in 31. That study also confirmed the 4 to 1 male to female ratio."

• Lois McClatchy Miller (52:07):
  "A woman is somebody who is defined by biological sex... It's about protecting opportunities, dignity, and safety for females."

• Natalie Morris (34:07):
  "Letitia James lied about the value of her own multimillion-dollar Brooklyn brownstone house."

---

Conclusion

This episode of Redacted News provides listeners with an in-depth exploration of pressing issues that challenge mainstream narratives. From advanced government technologies and international trade disputes to significant legal rulings and allegations of corruption among public officials, Clayton and Natalie Morris deliver a comprehensive and critical analysis aimed at uncovering the truth behind complex global events.

For those seeking an alternative perspective free from corporate and mainstream media biases, this episode offers valuable insights and thought-provoking discussions.

Transcript

[Clayton Morris]

And good afternoon, everyone. Welcome into Redacted. I'm Clayton Morris.

[Natalie Morris]

I'm Natalie Morris.

[Clayton Morris]

And on this show, we tend to cover the stories the mainstream media largely ignores. And today we're going to talk about, well, a number of big stories. We're going to actually dive into some bombshell discussions from members of the White House talking about being able to manipulate time and space. And we're hearing this now from a number of different people inside me, you know, inside the government about what technologies the United States actually has in its possessions. So we're going to talk about that. We're also going to talk about President Trump firing back at Xi Jinping and China with 245% tariffs now, China is responding just a short time ago. This sort of back and forth is now basically escalating into Trade War Part 2.

[Natalie Morris]

We're also going to talk about President Zelensky expanding martial law. There was originally supposed to be an election last year, but now Ukrainians have a choice. They continue to have a leader who wants to ruin them and wants death. Also, he's hiring mercenaries. That's kind of weird considering that he's screaming so loudly about Russian mercenaries. Also, we're going to talk about this new CDC report showing that autism is in fact on the rise. What RFK Jr has said and how he's turned the tide on anti vaxxers. Plus, the UK Supreme Court decides what a woman is. And guess what, it's a biological woman. Woman. You're not a woman, Clayton. You cannot be a woman.

[Clayton Morris]

You know, I have in the uk I had a hint about this. I had a hint about this for many, many years that you were not a woman. I was not a woman. Yeah.

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

Thankfully now the UK tells me that I'm not a woman.

[Natalie Morris]

This is a landmark case.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, we'll go into all now.

[Natalie Morris]

So, yes, I can't wait to talk about it.

[Clayton Morris]

All right, well, let's get into the news then. And good to see all of you guys on a. What is today Wednesday?

[Natalie Morris]

It's Wednesday.

[Clayton Morris]

Yes. Wednesday. Welcome in, everyone. Good to see you guys. Thank you for subscribing to the show. It's free to subscribe whether you're on rumble, whether on YouTube, whether you're on X, you're on Twitch, all of that is there. So let's get some crazy news right off the top here before we talk about tariffs and before we talk about Iran. Yes, the White House has just admitted on the record that we possess the technology to manipulate time and space. In other words, time Travel teleportation technology. Yes. The ability to transport large military craft from point A to point B nearly instantaneously. Seriously, Just like what the United States did when they teleported flight MH370. Of course, we've covered that extensively here on the show. Friend of the show, Ashton Forbes, who's done remarkable work breaking this story wide open on the teleportation quantum teleportation technology, teleporting this craft out of thin air, watches. It just vanishes in thin air as the orbs fly right around the outside of it. And. And it disappears. Boom. Right there. Gone. No, well, we looped it and we looped it. Okay, So I know it looks like it reappeared, but anyway. So this confirms what we've been reporting for years from whistleblowers, members of the military who've been on our show. We've spoken privately with them also, who've never been on the show, didn't want their faces on camera. Who witnessed this technology in action. They worked on programs where this technology was in action. I want to play two clips for you now. One is from a few years ago, General Stephen Kwast. He was the commander of the Air Education and Training Command at Joint Base San Antonio Randolph. And he was really pushing for Space Force at the time because of the technologies that we could employ from what he saw in action. So here he's explaining the technologies that he's seen on the desks of engineers at the United States Air Force Watch.

[General Stephen Kwast]

The technology is on the engineering benches today. But most Americans and most in Congress have not had time to really look deeply at what's going on here. But I've had the benefit of 33 years of studying and becoming friends with these engineers and these scientists. This technology can be built today with technology that is not developmental to deliver any human being from any place on planet Earth to any other place in less than an hour. To deliver WI fi from space, where you never need a cell tower to connect to deliver energy from space, where you never have to plug your phone in and it trickle charges and you can use that energy over time.

[Clayton Morris]

Okay, was anyone paying attention? We were. So this confirms what we've been reporting for years on this show. So let me repeat what he just said. Quote, we have tech today that can take you from anywhere on Earth to anywhere else in an hour. Wireless energy, where you could never need to plug in anything again. He saw this technology while he was at the Air Force engineering offices in Colorado where he worked. The second just happened yesterday. Second clip. I want to show you, Trump White House official from the office of Science and Technology director Michael Kuriatsas says that we possess the technology that can manipulate time and space. Watch.

[General Stephen Kwast]

Our passenger planes are slower than they used to be. Our trains crawl compared to those in other parts of the world. Our cars do not fly. Advances have not stopped. But something has gone wrong. Stagnation was a choice. We have weighed down our builders and innovators. The well intentioned regulatory regime of the 1970s became an ever tightening ratchet. First hampering America's ability to become a net energy exporter and then making it harder and harder to build. We seem to have lost focus and vision, to have lowered our sights and let systems and structures and bureaucracies muddle us along. But we are capable of so much more. Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated, causing us to grow and improve productivity.

[Clayton Morris]

Okay, so this is setting off all sorts of crazy alarm bells today. Friend of the show physicist Ashton Forbes posted this about the news and like we him we have a lot of questions. So Creatis casually says we intentionally stagnated our technology in the 1970s and now we have the tech to manipulate space and time. Wow. Ross Kohlhart, UFO investigator posted this just a few minutes ago. President United States Science and Technology Advisor Creatus, a former undersecretary of DoD makes the most extraordinary assertion here without any explanation that the United States technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. So tomorrow I just spoke with Ashton Forbes. He's going to be on the show tomorrow. We're going to deep dive this. We've already talked about time travel with Ashton in a couple of interviews with him. But I really want to dive more deeply into this and hopefully over the next 24 hours we will learn more about this.

[Natalie Morris]

This is going to the bank last week with Clayton and the banker said oh you know, I need your trustee to sign this. And he goes, the government has the ability to beam them here. They've had it for years. And I'm like Clayton, this people, I know this, let's just get this.

[Clayton Morris]

But it was hilarious. She just, she's like wait a minute, what? And she couldn't believe it. I'm like oh yeah, we've had this technology for years and you should watch our interviews with this, this and this. And she's like, she couldn't even move on. She's like I just, I'm so dwell. I can't believe the teleportation. Wait, our government has teleportation quantum teleportation technology. I'm like, yes, they do. Of course they do. They've had it for years and they've been lying to us about it. Right.

[Natalie Morris]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, my daughter too, my 12 year old daughter. Wait a minute. We, we had to fly to get to that place to go see grandma. We could have just literally been beamed there. Anyway, we're gonna dive more deeply into that tomorrow, but now maybe a little bit more grounded here. Let's talk about Iran, shall we? Because did President Trump's team just give Netanyahu the middle finger in front of the cameras? President Trump is playing tough, talking about bombing Iran, but in private though, he knows that would be a disaster for America and the world. And sources are saying behind closed doors things are much different. You know, you saw him with, with El Salvador president the other day and he's talking about bombing Iran if they don't come to the table. Trump does not want to bomb Iran, according to the sources. He wants them to be successful, which is exactly what he said on Patrick Bet David's show just a short time ago. Watch tanks running around. What's going to happen in Iran with you by the end of your administration? I don't, I'm not going to see Iran be very successful. The only thing is they can't have a nuclear weapon. Are you okay with the same administration and way of governing states, or would you like to see it go back to the 70s when Shah was running it and Iran was one of the top three countries in tourism? Yeah, we can't get totally involved in.

[Patrick Bet David]

All, you know, I mean, we can't.

[Clayton Morris]

Run ourselves, let's face it. Sure, Patrick, we. So I want Iran to be successful, incredibly successful. And he said it multiple times. And we can't get totally involved. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is practically frothing at the mouth, of course, to push the United States into a full scale war with Iran. Trump just basically told him, sit down, we're talking with them. You sit down now. According to a new report from Zero Hedge, Trump is actively engaged in back channel negotiations with Iran right now. And one Trump official said the discussions have been, quote, excellent. Like you don't just throw that word around, excellent. They were supposed to be for a certain amount of time and they exceeded that. They went well over their time and these discussions have been excellent with Iran to prevent a war. And with that one sentence, excellent, basically the entire military industrial complex probably spit out their, their morning espresso because they desperately want us to go to war. They want a lot of people to die and they want to make a lot of money off of it. Of course, Israel is pushing hard behind the scenes right now. They want Trump to bomb Iran, period. They want the United States military to do their dirty work. Of course, Netanyahu has been begging the United states Congress for 30 years to destroy Iran. Here's 2002, right after the 911 attacks. You talk about a network of terror. Are there any other nations that you would recommend that the United States launch preemptive attacks upon at this point?

[Benjamin Netanyahu]

No. The issue is not. The issue is not. First of all, are there other nations that are developing nuclear weapons? Yes.

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

Should we.

[Clayton Morris]

Should we launch any other preemptive attacks?

[Benjamin Netanyahu]

First, let me say what they are, and then let me make a suggestion how to proceed.

[Natalie Morris]

Thank you.

[Benjamin Netanyahu]

The answer is categorically yes. The two nations that are vying, competing with each other, who will be the first to achieve nuclear weapons is Iraq and Iran. And Iran, by the way, is also outpacing Iraq in the development of ballistic missile systems that they hope will reach the eastern seaboard of the United States within 15 years. So I guess that doesn't include California, but includes Washington. But what it does, what a third nation, by the way, is Libya as well. Libya is. While no one is watching.

[Clayton Morris]

Okay, so why did we did his bidding on uk?

[Natalie Morris]

What? Why didn't he name the UK Or France?

[Clayton Morris]

I don't know. But we did his bidding on Iraq. He got what he wanted for Iraq. We did his bidding on Libya, as Hillary Clinton did, and the Obamas, we came, we saw, we killed.

[Natalie Morris]

And now he wants Iran.

[Clayton Morris]

Of course, that's the next one on the list. Iran.

[Natalie Morris]

In Scott Horton's great book, Enough Already, he talks about how Iraq did have weapons, but they were not of mass destruction. They were like baby weapons. They were like toys. It was in its infancy. So, okay, that one didn't hold up. Why has he not been punished for leading us into a war based on a lie?

[Clayton Morris]

But Trump isn't biting on this. He knows there are only two real options on the table right now. Option one is a check strategy, which is diplomacy first model, right now, which is where international inspectors routinely verify that Iran is only enriching uranium for civilian energy purposes, not for nuclear weapons. It's basically the same model that was working before Biden blew it up and sent the region spiraling out of control. Option two, of course, is what Israel wants, a preemptive bombing campaign, or I should say Netanyahu wants, because Israelis don't want this I mean, Israel would be destroyed, would be wiped off the map. So Israelis don't want this. That's why there's thousands of protesters in the streets against Netanyahu. They don't want it. And, but yet Netanyahu, Netanyahu absolutely wants it. A bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities. But of course, here's the problem with that. This would, wouldn't be like Iraq at all. This would be Iraq times three, literally. I mean, Iran is three times the size of Iraq, has a much stronger military, battle hardened militias across the Middle east, and oh yeah, by the way, the full backing of Russia on top of it. Let's not forget about that. This would be an absolute catastrophe. Of course. Steve Witkoff confirmed to Fox News last night that Trump is seeking to limit Iran's enrichment down to 3.67% for use for nuclear power plants in order to basically become a successful country, which is what Trump has been saying all along. Watch this message of peace through strength. It resonates throughout the world. This is, I'm not, this is not a threat on my part now. It is just a simple fact. The President means what he says, which is they cannot have a bomb. The, the conversation with the Iranians will be much about two critical points. One, enrichment, as you mentioned, they do not need to enrich past 3.67%. In some circumstances they're at 60%, in other circumstances, 20%. That cannot be. And so for nuclear enrichment, for the purpose of nuclear energy to power their country. Iran's media, which has really not wanted Iran to engage with the United States and Israel has really come around on this. You're seeing over the past 48 hours, the Iranian media is now expressing talks with the, expressing support for backing these talks with the United States, talking with Trump, ironing this out, keeping us out of war. But of course, Netanyahu desperately wants the war.

[Natalie Morris]

And also for the obvious reason that they want sanctions to be lifted, the United States has placed them under heavy sanctions since the Bush era, exacerbated by Barack Obama with the lie of the fact that their sanctions would deter them from a nuclear weapon. And they never proved it. Plus, we launched a cyber attack on their nuclear centrifuges. And so Iranians want to have prosperity through free trade, obviously.

[Clayton Morris]

Tony Griffith in our chat points, as he said, that's not what Tulsi Gabbard said to Congress a few weeks ago. You're right about that. I mean, talking about the developed, moving towards a development of a nuclear weapon and whatever sort of grade uranium Enrichment is happening right now. She said there's zero intelligence on this, that the United States intelligence community has confirmed that they're not moving towards a nuclear weapon. So I think Trump knows that, and I think that's where these things are moving. So the talks will continue on Saturday as they move towards this agreement. All right, you want to talk about China?

[Natalie Morris]

Sure, I will do it.

[Clayton Morris]

All right. Well, China has just warned Donald Trump to stop whining about being a victim of tariffs in the escalating trade war between these two nations.

[Natalie Morris]

So China wants Trump to just accept the tariffs that China has placed on America over the years, sit there and take it like a champ. But Trump will not. He signed an executive order to block risky imports of processed materials, all those rare earth minerals. And according to a new White House fact sheet sheet, Trump used Section 232 authority to justify the tariffs, saying that there is a real danger of relying on China for material like lithium, graphite and rare earth elements. The message, America is done being dependent on China for rare earth minerals. We've been warning about this for years on the show. America has the ability to mine many of the rare earth minerals that we need for production. The problem is that litigation has, by environmentalists has tied all that up and, and tied the hands of any administration that wants to do it. One of the things that the president said in his inauguration speech is we're just going to get rid of this litigation and we're just going to go for it. We're going to go. I don't know how he intends to do it, but clearly he wants to do it in many of the communities that have these minerals and resources also want the industry, they want the jobs, they want the prosperity. And can you blame them? Now, the fallout from this, though little tiff, little as we can, we can call it, was immediate. Nvidia stock tanked after warning that the new restrictions on AI chip imports to China would cost the company $5.5 billion. I wonder, did Nancy Pelosi have a heads up about that? Because that might have hurt her stock portfolio. I'm concerned.

[Clayton Morris]

I'm sure she was. I'm sure she probably sold the stock ahead of time.

[Natalie Morris]

I mean, she needed to know. You know, she's got a, a solid record of her insider trading. So I hope that she had a heads up.

[Clayton Morris]

She has the best record of stop trading any by anybody. Exactly.

[Natalie Morris]

All right. Well, but Wall street also took a hit with the Nasdaq dropping over 2%. And analysts who don't like these tariffs are Also warning that this could trigger another inflationary wave, especially if China retaliates. Now, China is furious. They say that this is unlawful. And in response, they slapped export bans on tech metals and Xi Jinping. The President says if Trump is respectful, we'll talk. I mean, define respectful. Productive, possibly. I'm not sure that as a prerequisite, but okay. They're bringing in new trade negotiators to send to Washington, and the tariffs just seem all over the place. As we've covered it does seem an inelegant rollout of what we may all have agreed was necessary. But this is messy. Okay? We were warned that it would be messy. Did we want it this way? I don't know. And here's where it gets interesting. Xi Jinping is suddenly open to talking, but only if the US Respects its core interests and stops playing economic hardball. Translation? China is feeling the squeeze too.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, they are.

[Natalie Morris]

Absolutely.

[Clayton Morris]

But look at these tariffs. So just to give you an idea, so people are saying this. These are all over the place. Like, okay, wait a minute. 245% on syringes and needles, lithium ion batteries, 173% squid. 170 tariff on squid. So, Philip, you're not going to be able to eat your squid tonight unless you want to pay that much. Wool sweaters. You know, look at the tea. It's just weird. Kind of aluminum foil.75 all the way down to children's books at the bottom. 0%.

[Natalie Morris]

Interesting.

[Clayton Morris]

So, I mean, do you want your children's books coming from China? 0%. Okay, that's. That's fascinating. All right, so we'll watch these tariffs back and forth. It seems like China is ready to sit down at the table. So will these 240, 45% tariffs be pushed aside? It doesn't seem like it anytime soon, that's for sure.

[Natalie Morris]

All right, I apologize. We were having issues with the software that brings our guests in. But we do have a guest, right?

[Clayton Morris]

Yes, we do.

[Natalie Morris]

We do. Okay. I'm sorry. I just needed to work that out in front of you all. Thank you for that. Well, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelinsky gave himself a three month extension of his own presidency by extending martial law for another three months. Now, Ukraine was due for presidential elections last year, but President Zelensky canceled them and has many times said, Ukrainian people don't want to go to the polls. They want me right here because I'm an international superstar. They love me. They do not want any regime change. If only there was a way to know that for sure. If only, I don't know, like elections. Like an election. Ukrainian media though, had been reporting that Zelensky would not extend his regime because they are state run. But alas, he did. So they have egg on their face. And his advisors now say that elections will not be held until at least six months after the martial law. So martial law could just keep going and then after that another six months. Well, Drew Berquist is ex CIA and former counterterrorism officer and host of this is My show, has been warning that Zelensky is a dictator. So thank you for joining us. What do you think happens to the people of Ukraine given that they can never have their voices heard?

[Drew Berquist]

Well, that's a good question. Thanks for having me, by the way. I mean, look, this, this is going to continue in perpetuity for, for a long while because it's so good for Zelensky. Right, which is why we're seeing all the things that you just described. Martial law. We're going to go ahead and push those elections off. Keep in mind, this was a guy who was not well liked prior to all of this kicking off. And as it's gone on, maybe, maybe there's been some climbs in certain sectors and areas of the population, but I just don't think that it's an overwhelming amount of support for the guy. It's just not. And, and for the people there, it is a tough spot. They're, they're, they're caught in a proxy war where they have no say in the matter whatsoever. And you've got us, the United States, our puppets in, in Ukraine in terms of Zelensky and some of them in Russia all duking this out and they really don't have any say. So it is. As much as I hate what's going on over there and I wish we had nothing to do with it, even though I know exactly how we, we do these things behind the scenes. For some of the Ukrainians, it's a terrible situation.

[Clayton Morris]

So as ex CIA and you know, you. We know, we know. We've been reporting before the New York Times ever told us that the CIA has been involved in their government since 2014 in the Maidan coup and everything. The CIA is multiple, multiple offices all across Ukraine. I like to say that Ukraine is basically run by the CIA. So I couldn't the CIA do what it does and hold some sort of an election that gives them some sort of, some sort of leverage here? I mean, it seems like they're controlling things there anyway.

[Drew Berquist]

Yeah, absolutely they could. The but the kicker is in all these situations is what seems like conventional wisdom to the, to the layman person out there, to the person who's just consuming news, or maybe even the citizens of that country. You know, wherever you're coming from, if you're not deep in the mix, making decisions, sitting at these tables, running operations behind the scenes, you just, you really don't have a say. And even if there was an election, it doesn't mean that it's going to be run fairly. Right. Typically in these types of situations, the outcome is however we want the outcome to be. So when you look at this, you would say, okay, well, we've been involved there. Don't we want an election? But, but that's presuming we want this to end. And I think that that's where this has been so complex is there's, as you guys know, and so many listening to your show know there's money and war. So.

[Clayton Morris]

Right.

[Drew Berquist]

So if, if we have an actual election and people are allowed to share their, their, their voice and their vision for where they want this country to go, it could go catastrophically wrong. So the easiest thing to do sometimes is to keep it exactly as it is. We're going to keep this guy here, we'll pet his head every once in a while. He's getting out of control. We've got to watch that, which is a big issue right now. But, but we need this to go. So just because the country and we, the people back here, the taxpayers want to stand, doesn't mean that the intel community does.

[Clayton Morris]

Well, that's very, very smart. Yeah, right. That's a very smart way to take, I mean, look at this. Absolutely.

[Natalie Morris]

Now another thing that the Ukrainian government has decided is that they're going to pay travel expenses for anyone who wants to join as a mercenary. We don't see the same enthusiasm that we saw when this war broke out in 2022. He's saying, hey, we got food and travel for you. You may not go back and ever need food. Maybe a one way ticket.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, you'll die in two weeks.

[Natalie Morris]

Right. So any takers? Now why though would Zielinski make such a stink about, oh, you know, Russia's using foreign mercenaries. I found some Chinese, I found some North Koreans, but then go and do the same thing. Why do we listen to this hypocrite? And why, why would they do this? Is it obvious that J.D. vance was right, they have a recruitment problem?

[Drew Berquist]

Well, they absolutely do, because this is something that they can't mean. Trump talked about it this week. And, and people can agree with him or disagree with them, but they can't win this. So they've always needed help and now it's drug on so long there's been so many deaths, so the morale is way, way down, understandably so. So you have to look to outside. And the thing to keep in mind, too, with this is this whole time that it's gone on never should have started in the first place, dating all the way back to 2014, but certainly since the biggest, you know, the more recent uptick in what's led to all of this stuff is they never had a whole lot going on in the first place on their own. In situations like this, you've got our people on the ground that you never knew were on the ground, training, advising and assisting and running these things. And, and I'm not saying it goes this way every time. You can't just paint everything that way. But, but typically in those situations, it's, hey, here's the deal. We're going to give you money, weapons and equipment, all that kind of stuff, and we're going to train, advise and assist. But really, sit down, shut up, go color over here. Here's a coloring book. You know, we've got this. So it's. They've never had all the resources they need in terms of personnel. So now this far into it with, with support waning, of course, they have to do that. And what's so remarkable about this is we'll pay your travel. It's no, no, you'll pay your travel. Go ahead and pay Uncle Sam, who will pay us, and then we'll pay you back a portion of that. It's. The whole thing is just so ridiculous. It needs to end. And Zielinski's gotten so out of control.

[Clayton Morris]

Drew, we'll get you out of here on this. We saw Steve Witkoff, I think spent a long time in Russia just recently. I passed over the past few days. Trump's, you know, peace delegation, basically trying to negotiate peace there. Where do you think things stand now? We were hearing all peace is on the horizon. Peace is about to happen. In the early days of the Trump administration seemed to peter out a little bit. Now it seems like it's coming back. Where do you think things stand?

[Drew Berquist]

Well, I think it's tough. I think Europe is, is continuing to perpetuate war. I think that we've got people here still, and I think that Trump and the administration are doing all they can. They're doing some great things, but there's still, there's still some outliers here in the government who have a different agenda. They, they want to go a different direction than the administration. That will be sorted out in time, I hope. And, and, and presume. But, but you've got a lot of people who are pushing back against it. And Zelensky, you know, if this ends, Zelensky ends, you know, the popularity and see, he's going to walk away with bags of cash for sure. It's either he walks away with bags of cash into silent and goes off into obscurity or, or, or someone takes care of him because he got a little unruly. But like his, his, his paths are pretty clear and certain. So he doesn't want to, Dan, Europe doesn't want it to end. And, and clearly all this time we haven't wanted to. Now we do with Witkoff there and this Trump administration. But that's the problem is we're facing all this because a lot of people make money, a lot of people like where it's at. And at the end of the day, that I think that's one of the big things that we're facing. This thing never should have gotten this far. Right. It never should have started in the first place. And then in the last few years when it kicked off, I mean, when did the United States ever off offer an off ramp to peace? Never like we never did until Trump got into office. So we're facing an uphill battle in getting this done. So it's not all, and I'm not suggesting that you're saying that it is, but it's not all on, on Trump in this administration.

[Clayton Morris]

Oh no. I mean he was handled. He was handed a shit sandwich, that's for sure.

[Natalie Morris]

Well, no, and he's like a child who's given the choice between mommy and daddy. Like that's what Zelensky is. And you know, and so who does he choose as his allies? The United States of European Union. He doesn't know. He's adult.

[Drew Berquist]

Yeah, yeah, he, absolutely. And there is a really wrong decision on this and he, my sinking suspicion is he will choose the wrong thing and this will go the wrong way. But, but again, these, anytime we prop up a leader like we did Zelensky, and I know some Ukrainians are offended by that and that's adorable. But, but he, anytime we do this, it always goes this way. They, they, they start listening to people, you know, chitter, chattering in their ears. They think that maybe they've actually accomplished something. They haven't. And I'm not suggesting that we should have propped him up and we should be doing anything in that country that we're doing. I. I totally disagree with all of it, but that's how it works. And they get unruly, and then these things, you know, the. The situations exacerbated, and they continue on. More people die, more money is expensed when none of it needed to happen in the first place.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah. I think pretty soon, next, as you pointed out, he's going to be handed a couple of bags of cash and probably given, like, a nice sort of beachfront condo down near you down there in Jacksonville. So you might be neighbors with Zelensky soon.

[Drew Berquist]

Yeah. Come on. Come on. We'll dance together. It'll be a great. It would be a great time.

[Natalie Morris]

Come for a barbecue, right?

[Drew Berquist]

Yes.

[Clayton Morris]

See how long that lasts. Drew, great to see you. Thank you so much for your perspective on this. Great having you.

[Drew Berquist]

Absolutely. Thanks so much for having me.

[Clayton Morris]

You bet. He's great.

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah, he's great.

[Clayton Morris]

Thanks, Drew.

[Natalie Morris]

All right, coming up, we're going to talk about Letitia James because she has egg on her face. She's a big hypocrite, and I am here for it. We're also going to talk about the female astronauts. I can't get enough of this story. I will not stop. You're staying for it. We have things to discuss. But before we get there, I want.

[Clayton Morris]

To tell you about our friends over at Hungry Root. Because, you know, look, this is the busy time of year. I got our family right now with three kids and, you know, you dance class and swimming lessons and everything, or it's not swim team and just. It's craziness right now. So, like, trying to plan meals is absolutely insane. Going grocery shopping, trying to figure out what you're going to plan for the week. Hungry Root is like having your own personal shopper. They take care of the weekly grocery shopping, recommending healthy groceries tailored to your tastes, your nutrition preferences, your healthy goals. They have great options for the whole family with healthy groceries, like smoothies, kids, snacks, sweets, ready to eat meals, salad kits, even supplements if you want them. There's no fructose, high fructose corn syrup, no artificial sweeteners, no preservatives of any kind in Hungry Roots food. So you don't have to worry about. I mean, look, we're trying to make Maha right. We're trying to make America healthy again. Stay away from all that highly processed stuff. Hungry Root is the opposite of that. They will give you fresh, delicious food, top quality meats and seafood, free of hormones and antibiotics. They're really fantastic. I mean, unmatched convenience on what you get when you order from Hungry Root delivered right to your door. They taste, the tastes and tailors are amazing for what you order. I love Hungryroot. Take advantage of this exclusive offer for a limited time, get 40% off your first box, plus a free item in every box for life. So go to hungryroot.comredact and use the code redacted. That's hungryroot.com redacted. Use the code redact to get 40% off your first box and a free item of your Choice for Life. Hungryroot.com redacted use that code redacted. Check them out today. At least give them a try and see if it fits your lifestyle. That's what I always say. You never, you know, you're never gonna get hurt by just trying them and see how that goes. All right, well, someone who's gonna be a little hurt is Leticia James. By Leticia. If you looked up the word karma in the dictionary, you would likely see a picture of Leticia James. Yeah, that Leticia James. The same New York Attorney General who spent the last few years going after Donald Trump like it's her full time job. Like she has nothing. Like there's no other crime. There's nothing else to worry about in New York City or New York State. Nothing else to worry about. But you gotta go after Donald Trump. Uh, well, she has just been hit with a criminal referral for. Wait for it. Real estate fraud. I mean, you can't even make this up. The woman who screamed for years that Trump inflated his real estate values is now being accused of doing the very same exact thing herself. Karma, plain and simple. There's no other way to read this. Former congressional candidate Mike Sappra Cohn has filed an official criminal referral to the House Judiciary Committee. Here it is. He says in his accusation that Letitia James lied about the value of her own multimillion dollar Brooklyn brownstone house, saying it was worth only $250,000 when comparable properties on the same block were selling for over $2 million. Look, if you've ever lived in New York City or the immediate surrounding areas, you know how absurd this is. I mean, parking spaces sell for over $300,000. I've seen parking spaces sell for $600,000. So the fact that she said that her brownstone Brooklyn home was only worth $250,000 is laughable at best. Um, that's not a rounding error either, by the way. That's felony level fraud. And according to the referral, it potentially implicates major or multiple state and federal crimes because it was happening across state lines, including perjury, falsifying records, bank fraud, wire fraud. Oh, and tax evasion on top of it.

[Natalie Morris]

Well, also, some of the details are, is that she had a primary. She claimed that she was going to have a primary residence in Virginia so that she could get. Because mortgage rates are more favorable when you are buying a house that you intend to live in. And so she said that she was applying for a primary residence in Virginia and that her father was her husband and they were going to be on the same loan when she is obligated to be a resident of New York in order to be the AG there. So either she lied to the. To the voters saying she lived in New York and she didn't, or she lied on this Virginia residence and tried to get a more favorable loan for that residence. So which is it? So she's backed into a corner here. That's serious. You cannot lie on a mortgage application. That's a federal form. And so again, what she did to Trump when there were no, you know, even the. The court in the Trump case says, where are the victims? Because Deutsche bank, who gave Trump those loans, said, we actually weren't hurt. We got paid back. We made. We gave him a favorable rate. The due diligence was on us. There was never any victims. But this is actually something completely different. Go ahead. Sorry, I interrupted you.

[Clayton Morris]

No, you just read the rest of the story, which is great. So we're just on the same page here. Trump gets dragged through the mud in court. He gets fined hundreds of millions of dollars, has his entire business empire threatened as a result of it. Right. For allegedly overvaluing his real estate. And the bank says, hey, we're totally fine with these valuations, and they gave them a loan on top of this. Meanwhile, Letitia James sitting pretty in a multimillion dollar townhouse, she may have intentionally undervalued to dodge paying taxes. So here's what she had to say about going after Trump. No one is above the law. Remember this.

[Natalie Morris]

Representing our respective states, stand up and enforce the rule of law. The president of these United States is not above the law. No matter how rich, powerful, or politically connected you are, everyone must play by the same rules. Will you sue him for us? Oh, we're gonna definitely sue him. We're gonna be a real pain in the.

[General Stephen Kwast]

And now the Trump Justice Department makes.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah. So where's the FBI raid on her house? Where's the FBI going through her underwear drawer? Where's Alvin Bragg's mug shot moment for her? Like to be on the front page of the New York Post. By the way, that mug shot is now hanging just outside of the Oval Office on purpose. So when you walk past it to go into the Oval Office for a meeting, you see Trump's mug shot, which is just. It's pretty amazing. That's pretty amazing. But here's the real kicker. As Zero Hedge points out, she may have claimed a homestead exemption on her property without actually living there at all. You can only claim homestead, of course, if it's your primary residence. So in plain English, she told the government, yeah, this is my primary residence. So she could save shave money off of her tax bill when possibly living somewhere else entirely.

[Natalie Morris]

This is not an accident. You cannot definitely do this. You can't not have not known. Yeah, no, this was criminal.

[Clayton Morris]

It's criminal because, you know, at the heart of a homestead exemption, like, we looked at doing this actually for a while when we lived in New York City and, like. But we couldn't do it because you have to live there six months and a day, Right. In this other residence to claim homestead exemption. And so people will get this homestead exemption in Florida, like New York City CEOs and Wall street types, whatever. And they'll. They have a home in Florida and they'll get the homestead exemption because they. And they try to spend six months and one day in Florida.

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

And then they come back to New York City for five months and 30 days. You know, then they can get the homestead exemption because they're legit. And you can see that in your plane travel and your credit card. Like, if you're using. You're buying gas at the gas station.

[Natalie Morris]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

They know where you are.

[Natalie Morris]

You have to prove it.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah.

[Natalie Morris]

And other ways you can prove it if your kids are in school. There were her kids in school in Virginia. I don't even know if she has kids. Do you have a gym membership there? Where is your driver's license held? If she does not have a Virginia driver's license, that's a big deal. But if she has a Virginia driver's license, how the hell is she the AG of New York State?

[Clayton Morris]

Right, exactly. So she's an absentee ag. So she comes back to New York just to go after Trump, and then she goes back to Virginia. Okay, well, anyway, here's what she wrote last Valentine's Day. Roses are red, violets are blue. No one is above the law. Even when you think the rules don't apply to you? Happy Valentine's Day. So, Leticia James, Karma, Karma's coming for you.

[Natalie Morris]

Well, the female empowerment space flight may be a total nightmare for Blue Origin. It may go down as one of the biggest PR flops in modern times. Now this so called crew is saying they are very offended by the backlash and it is sexist. And they say, hey, we didn't just ride the space capsule. We did research up there. So I'm very confused because the whole thing was 11 minutes. They were actually in space for four minutes. So I can't wait to see what kind of research can be done in four minutes. Here is Gayle King justifying how she accomplished so much and her fellow passenger, Aisha Bo, who is a scientist, saying, hey, we did serious business in that four minutes. Well, there are so many things that have been developed in space that benefit Earth, from pharmaceuticals to research on agriculture. And I paused there because we did research and it was emotional. Part of what I accomplished in my flight was I was looking at the future, being able to produce crops that can withstand harsh environments, so we can look at food security here on Earth. And simultaneously, we also were able to certify that device so more people could do research on New Shepherd.

[Clayton Morris]

So what if Privateer Productions in our chat says, yeah, four minutes playing with stuffed animals, which is what they were doing.

[Natalie Morris]

Well, let's look into that research, shall we? I took a look, and she has, in fact, collaborated with Winston Salem State University, which they call themselves a historical, historically black educational institution. And according to this release, their project was to bring crop plants on her flight. So presumably they were in her purse or in a container. We never got to see any footage of the plants. And she says, and this project says that now the students will analyze how plants responded to microgravity at the molecular level. So some questions. Did they actually need her to be there, or could they have put it in, like, a suitcase and sent that up in the overhead compartment? Or what was her role there? Just bringing them along because she already had a ticket. Also, the footage in the pod showed these ladies mostly fooling around with tchotchke. So does she really do anything while she was there, or did she just carry along those plants? And like, anybody could have done it. You could have put it in, like a barrel or something. And can you really study. This is a good question for Philip, who has a molecular biology background. Can you study exposure to something from four minutes in a pressurized chamber? Like, what are we going to get from this what is humanity going to get from this, do you think?

[Philip]

I mean, I think if, if four minutes of exposure to microgravity would affect the molecules in whatever plant she had, I would, I would argue that everybody on the International Space Station is, is, is like way overly mutated or they're just disintegrating. Like, I, I don't see, I don't see. Like maybe, maybe, I don't know, maybe there's some like, like research parameters that I'm not familiar with here. But I, I wouldn't say that if somebody wrote this up as a, as a proposal for research that this would gain any traction whatsoever. This seems a little suspect to me. Possibly, possibly even bogus. This sounds like what you would do, like a science experiment for kindergarteners to get them into science.

[Clayton Morris]

One man band in our chat says, I just jumped up there. Sorry, sorry, I missed it now. Just jumped. But he said four minutes. Yeah, come on. I feel bad now. Sorry. Let me give me the mouse back here. Four minute. Shoot. Sorry. I was reading it and then it's just jumped. I apologize.

[Natalie Morris]

Paraphrase.

[Clayton Morris]

I don't even remember now, but it was good. But it was about. Yes, type it again because it was good.

[Natalie Morris]

Okay.

[Clayton Morris]

Four minutes in space.

[Natalie Morris]

I mean, it seems to me that it was clever of her to say, hey, I got a ticket on blue origin. Do you want to give me some science project? And we can say that this is research based. That seems very clever. Now this is not to take any way anything away from the fact that she is a published scientist. So I'm just curious about this project, this four minute project. And when she publishes this paper, I would very much like, like to see it. Now, when she talks about how humans benefited from space exploration. Well, that's true. That's why we have Velcro. That's why we have solar panels. But I do not buy that riding in a manned pod that was manned by men from the ground means that these women contributed to Velcro or what she talks about medicines or solar panels. Now Gayle King says that they are being downplayed because they are women. And men, when they take a ride to space, didn't get this kind of media coverage. Watch. What do you think when people say, oh, it's frivolous, number one, they call it a ride, which I find very irritating because they never say men went for a ride. Yes, they do. William Shatner went a couple years ago and they did in fact call it a ride. So no one actually thinks he's a real space captain. Well, do you?

[Clayton Morris]

I do, because I'm a huge Star Trek fan. So I believe that Bill Shatner is Captain Kirk. But even he, when he got back was like, that was an incredible ride.

[Natalie Morris]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

I mean, he's not like, I'm up there doing work. It's not like he was up there, you know, stopping Klingons.

[Natalie Morris]

Right. Well, I want to talk about this because these ladies were faffing about and the men on William Shatner's ride was completely different. I'm going to show you. Also, we still don't have footage, and we never did from the Shatner ride either, of the launch and the descent. I was expecting some kind of Spaceballs level, ludicrous speed. Like I wanted to see their faces look like this. If, you know, you know, if you don't watch Spaceballs with your family immediately, I just was wondering, why did we get that? Is it because they got sick or because they are maybe too vain to look like that? Or did it happen? I'm just wondering. Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

Was it totally fake?

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah. Now, again, let's watch the footage of William Shatner when he was in space for a short period of time and the sort of humility he showed and then compare and contrast that to the videos you're seeing of again, all the fooling around that the all women crew did watch. God, Weightlessness.

[Benjamin Netanyahu]

Oh, Jesus.

[Clayton Morris]

No description. They're just so quiet. They're just like taking it in. Except for the woman. But Clayton, this is, there's a lesson. Just don't send women into space.

[Natalie Morris]

So once he turns over his shoulder to say, wow, but he's not promoting anything. He's not, he said, you know, it gave him this profound sadness almost. It was humbling for him. Quite the opposite to the group of Barbies. Also, you might have noticed they weren't wearing these NASCAR looking suits. Well, the New York Times reported that Lauren Sanchez worked with designers from Oscar de la Renta to make these. And here was their goal. According to one of the designers. If we make these suits approachable and like something anyone could wear, then space might feel a little bit less distant. Maybe people would say, I want to buy that spacesuit and go to the gym.

[Clayton Morris]

Oh my God.

[Natalie Morris]

You're supposed to be motivated to go to the gym by these space outfits that were flattering and hourglass looking.

[Clayton Morris]

Kill.

[Natalie Morris]

And also they could zip down to here because that's Lauren Sanchez, Mo. So are you inspired to go to the gym again now, even though these ladies are now calling themselves astronauts, the FAA rules say they are not FAA rules require that the crew members have, quote, demonstrated activities during flight that were essential to public safety or contributed to human space flight safety. None of these girls did this. William Shatner didn't either. They took their seatbelts off and on and in order to descend. So it would be shameless to call yourself an astronaut, given these rules. And of course, the contrast of people who actually are astronauts. It's no better than saying that men can breastfeed, but they have the balls, I guess, to do it. These girls do. So let me know what you think of that.

[Clayton Morris]

Paris Paracres, in our chat, sadly redacted. Is promoting. Promoting a hoax so. Well, no. Yesterday on the show, we covered how a lot of people think this was fake. I mean, we showed you the hatch opening ahead of time before Bezos even walked up there. And I think, Cody, also. Can I have the mouse, if you please? Sorry. So Cody, in our chat says, Cody Pertletts, thank you for the 10 super chat. Says they accidentally were filming live when the door from the spaceship opened from inside. Fake, fake, fake. Yeah, we covered that yesterday on the show. We showed that capsule being opened from the inside.

[Natalie Morris]

Right. And right now, what I want to care. What I want to talk about is the ridiculous narratives is like, oh, it's sexist because you don't believe us. It's sexist because you say we didn't do very much. We did research. In four minutes, we did research. That's what we're talking about, right? Not now. Well, yesterday we talked about whether or not it happened. What were you going to say, Philip?

[Philip]

Oh, I just. Two things. One, I would. I would say, like, the only research I think you could conduct in four minutes would be like, microgravity's effect on your bladder would probably be a good. You know, if any of them peed themselves, then we would know that. But, like, it's the difference between saying, like, if I tell you, if I say, you know, I flew to Seattle this weekend, you would assume that I got on a plane and somebody else piloted it to Seattle. If I said I flew a plane to Seattle, you would assume I was the one flying the plane. That's why they're calling it a ride, because they didn't do anything. They just rode. They just. They were just in it.

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

I think next time you fly, Philip. Yeah. You're gonna be. You'll be considered part of the crew and may have to go up in the cockpit and take things over.

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah, yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

I mean.

[Natalie Morris]

I mean, at that point. At that point, I'LL be if I'm just writing.

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah.

[Philip]

At that point, I'll be a captain and an admiral. So. Because I've been on a boat before, too.

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

All right. We've got more news to get to here on your Wednesday. Yes, indeed it is Wednesday. The United Kingdom major Supreme Court decision has finally been able to say declaratively what it means to be a woman. They're defining a woman. Oh, my God. Heads are exploding all over the place. This is a massive story. We're going to talk about that coming up next. Plus, autism skyrocketing. RFK Jr. Just giving a speech a short time ago on these really devastating numbers in the United States. And they're going to be looking into it. We're going to talk about that. But first when I tell you about our friends over at Crowd Health.

[Natalie Morris]

That's right. Crowd health is an alternative to health insurance. Now we know everyone's pissed off at their health insurance. They deny claims, they inflate the prices. Well, you don't have to participate in civil unrest. You can disrupt by joining crowd health. It is not health insurance. Is it a crowd? It is a crowd plan, crowdfunded plan where you join a group of like minded people who emphasize health over disease. And they and when you go to the doctor, you pay a cash price. And if you have an emergency, you can crowdfund that and get paid back. Now, one of the great things is we use crowd health. And so when we've had emergencies in our house, we get a bill from the hospital and it will show a 30 to 40% discount in the price because we're not using an insurer. Well, what does that tell you is that maybe a $5,000 visit to the error, they could charge your insurance company $10,000 just because they can just inflate that price. But if you pay the cash price, you pay less. And then Crowd health has funded things from pregnancies to emergencies, illnesses, even cancer. You get this information as a crowd health member. I love crowd health. I sing their praises all the time. And in fact, because we did have two emergency events just in the last couple of months with our children, the hospital keeps calling and saying, are you sure you're a cash buyer? Don't you want an insurance? What's happening here? Why? Because they're not very happy about charging the price of those services. It's really punk rock. I love being a part of Crowd health. You will, too. Check them out. If you go to joincrowdhealth.com, you can participate in a chat. They can call you. They will answer all your questions. So go ahead and do that. Head on over to joincrowdhealth.com that's joincrowdhealth.com use the code redacted and you can get started for just 99 per month for your first three months by again using the code redacted@joincrowd health.com once again, crowd health is not insurance. And that's a good thing. Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

I just want to say, you know, we had to take our son to the emergency room a few weeks ago. We had to cancel the show. Many of you said kind, very kind words to us. Thank you very much for that. And when we left the emergency room that night, our bill, we're like, why is it so cheap?

[Natalie Morris]

Yeah.

[Clayton Morris]

And because normally they surge those prices if you have insurance. And so we paid that and then we got the bill from the hospital later, like the main bill. And then crowd health took care of it. We just submitted to crowd health and boom, done. So it's unbelievable, and I think it makes a lot of people's heads explode because a lot of people are spending like $3,000 a month on insurance. And it's a game changer. We've told a lot of our friends who are independent journalists who are in business for themselves, and they've joined crowd health because they're like, oh, my God, we were spending thousands of dollars a month on this crappy insurance. So anyway, I just. We really sing the praises of it. We have firsthand experience going to the emergency room and dealing with it. So.

[Natalie Morris]

And we want this to be the way of American health care. I absolutely do want more people to use this so that we don't have this totally crap insurance system with inflated prices and things like that. So check it out. Learn for yourself. I think you're gonna like it. All right, all right. Well, the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom has ruled that trans identified men are not legally women. And in fact, you have to be a real biological woman to be a woman. The court unanimously ruled the terms woman and sex in the 2010 Equality act referred to biological sex, not self identified gender. Here to discuss is Lois McClatchy Miller, who has been speaking out against this and is jubilant on her ex account. And I'm celebrating with you. So tell us what this means, how big this is, and are you surprised?

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

Well, this is the ultimate what is a woman case. And the court has answered loud and clear with unanimous verdict. A woman is somebody who is defined by biological sex and biological sex only a piece of paper and a claim to being a woman is not enough. A woman is a woman and no man can become one. So this is incredible. It's been a real journey in the UK that we've seen over the last five years. There's been several cases that have shifted the tide and made people think again about this very damaging, very harmful ideology, that it puts women at risk in safe spaces when it comes to their locker rooms, changing rooms, sports teams, prison cells, rape crisis shelters, and you name it. And it's also an ideology that has infected the minds of our kids and put them in danger when they look at their bodies and think that they're born in the wrong one and that they have to take drugs and chemicals and scalpels to fix themselves. Which is, of course, nonsense and of course, entirely damaging. So this verdict today really solidifies that absolute truth that we know that sex is. Sex is how you define man and woman. There's only one man and one woman, and they cannot become one another.

[Clayton Morris]

What about getting pregnant? Because I was really hoping, you know, with this shift over the past few years that I could get pregnant. I've been hearing a lot of liberals in the United States under the Biden administration, like, normalizing the idea that I could even breastfeed, I could get pregnant. But the Supreme Court now, also, it seems, recognizes pregnancy that I. I mean, they crapped all over my plan.

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

Sorry, had you been trying to get pregnant as a man?

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, really trying.

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

Unfortunately, even if the Supreme Court had said today that men could be a woman and that men could be pregnant, the biological reality, I'm sorry to let you know, is that you could never have. And that was one thing that the campaigners in the US That's a microaggression.

[Clayton Morris]

Sorry, that's a microaggression. No toleration for that.

[Natalie Morris]

You know, what started out with the.

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

Supreme Court, their words, not mine, but.

[Clayton Morris]

I know, I didn't mean to make a joke about it, but specifically, really, the. They do recognize in these provisions now at the Supreme Court that biological men cannot become pregnant. Like, it's. That's the law of the land now.

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

Well, this was referenced because the case dealt with what's called the Equality act legislation in the uk. It gives protection to people based on their characteristics. Okay. It was very controversial at the time, but it's been our law for the last 15 years. And so it provides protection from discrimination on the basis of sex, on the basis of religion, on the basis of race, etc. And then the Big question that the court had to answer was how, how does this protection on the basis of sex relate to men who claim to be women? Can they get the same protections as a woman who's born a woman? And as the court was dealing with these different aspects of being a woman, they said, well, one of the aspects that comes up here is a woman can claim discrimination on the basis that she's pregnant. You know, if she was fired because she was pregnant, she would have a claim to discrimination on the basis of her sex. And that's something that a biological male could never claim. And they drew that as a distinction between the two sexes and saying, we can't have the same laws between women and men claiming to be women because their bodies are just different, they have different needs and they face different discriminations.

[Natalie Morris]

Now, how can the United Kingdom, though, come back through the looking glass? Because we now have self ID. There are men who have identities or IDs that claim that they are women, even if they're not. And so they claim they can use that to access spaces. We saw after Trump was inaugurated that in Florida at least, there were some trans identified men who had their passports revoked and replaced for their biological gender. But I don't think Keir Starmer has the appetite to do anything of the sort. So do we have any kind of hope that that might happen?

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

Yeah, absolutely. You know, women's spaces will now have a law, a lawful claim. They did already, but they now have an entrenched legal claim to say that their spaces are for women only. This kind. This case actually came out of a time in Scotland, you may remember, where we had a male double rapist put into a woman's prison cell because he claimed to be a woman. And this sparked outrage and fury on the behalf of those vulnerable women who were going to be forced to be sharing this space with someone very violent, with a track record of violence against their sex. And so we've kind of come from that place and that I don't think we'll be seeing much of that happen anymore. In terms of males going into women's spaces, that's already been kind of flushed out the system in terms of social rejection of that phenomenon. And now we can look to things like women's changing rooms, women's sports teams. They're going to have a good foundational basis to say, look, this is for biological females. This is about protecting opportunities, dignity and safety, safety for females in the United Kingdom. And we have a basis in law to protect that.

[Clayton Morris]

It's amazing. It really is earth shattering. I mean, this is as big as it sounds.

[Natalie Morris]

But some of the opposition to this, that people are saying, oh, this is really going to hurt men's feelings and young boys feelings who want access to men's spaces. And I think back to the last time I was in London, I took my daughter to the Stranger Things play and there was a big burly man in a sequined dress and it, it scared her and she wanted to leave. And so.

[Clayton Morris]

But it was in the bathroom, it.

[Natalie Morris]

Was in the bath, in the women's bathroom. And she said, let's go to the other one. This is too scary. And so whose feeling are we prioritizing here? You have to choose sides, unfortunately. So what is the. But what is the rationale? Is it just women who are addicted to being advocates and see themselves as elevated because they can advocate for, advocate for these people?

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

So I don't think it's about choosing sides. I think it's about choosing feelings or safety. It's about choosing feelings or truth is about truth and feelings or someone's dignity and privacy. And, you know, we, there's. The Supreme Court judgment is very clear that they, they don't want this to be about picking sides. And they're very clear that there should be no discrimination against people who identify as trans. And I think, you know, nobody is wishing any side harm at all or wishing that anyone has less legal protections. What we're saying is that on the basis of sex, when females have a right and a claim to be discriminated to reject discrimination, then they should be able to do that. So they should have their own spaces, they should have their own rights when it comes to, you know, pregnancy, maternity leave, being in the workplace, all the things that females need to go through life in the United Kingdom without facing discrimination, they should have, and they should have that in a protected way. So it's really exciting to see the UK lead on this. We now look around the world and we hope that other countries across the world. I've just been back from Australia where I've seen, you know, this kind of woke mindset really take hold and they've got their own case upcoming to challenge this what is a woman question. And so we're kind of turn our eyes over there now to see will they follow and establish this fact that being a woman is a biological reality or will they buy into a, you know, an ideology which is harmful as well as untruthful?

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, I hope so. Yeah. Australia, New Zealand, really gone the way of the woke. The woke mob, unfortunately, yes.

[Natalie Morris]

But the UK I feel like, too. And it's, it's so encouraging to see this. You were right that they're leading this when they led the charge for trans rights. So it's an amazing day. Thank you so much for your time and for joining us. Follow Lois at Lois McClatch on X& other platforms. Thank you for joining us today.

[Lois McClatchy Miller]

Thank you.

[Natalie Morris]

It's Women's Day, Clayton.

[Clayton Morris]

It is Women's Day. We've got, well, some good news for women. And then you've got these terrible clowns in spades. So it's, it is Women's Day. We're going to talk about autism in a second big autism study that just came out from the U.S. centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Stunning numbers. RFK Jr. Just speaking about that just a short time ago. And so we'll talk about that. But first I want to tell you about our friends over at Hillsdale College. One of our favorite traditions, you know, is, you know, sitting down after the new year and kind of planning out what you want to do with your year. My birthday is New Year's Eve, so I get to kind of of reset for the year. And we all get an opportunity to kind of start that year fresh, set some new goals. And maybe you've, some of those have fallen off as we've headed to the second quarter of the year.

[Drew Berquist]

Right.

[Clayton Morris]

It's now April. Maybe you're thinking, okay, you know, maybe I need to reset. Maybe I wanted to read more. I wanted to study more and learn a few things this year. And that's where Hillsdale College comes in. They offer more than 40 free online courses. That's right. More than 40 free online courses. You can learn about the works of C.S. lewis, the stories in the book of Genesis, the meaning of the US Constitution, which I think we need now more than ever when people are telling us that Donald Trump and Elon Musk are destroying the US Constitution. Oh, really? Why don't you read it and maybe you could take a course on it from Hillsdale College or the Rise and Fall of the Roman Republic or the History of the Ancient Christian Church. All of it is free. The course courses are self paced. You can start whenever you want, wherever you want. And you can start for free right now. Go over to Hillsdale Edu redacted to enroll for free. There's no cost. It's easy to get started. I've taken, I think, two of their courses now and they're really, really good. That's Hillsdale Edu Redacted to enroll for free. Get some free education. So our thanks to Hillsdale for supporting our show.

[Natalie Morris]

Well, a shocking new report, but maybe not shocking because we've known this from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that autism is up 16.1% since the last time they checked. The numbers are now shocking. It is enough to scare any parent out there that 1 in 31 children in the United States has autism. Here is the report. You should read it for yourself. USHS Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Held a press conference today and one thing I noticed is that he may be turning the tables on people who accuse him of being an anti vaxxer. So nobody likes name calling, but he's been subjected to this. He's not an anti vaxxer. He likes to look at the vaccines one by one and he asks questions of how do they work together? Do they have contraindications? Have they been thoroughly studied? Asking those questions has earned him the title of anti vaxxer. But now he is calling anyone who calls him that an epidemic denier. You see what we're doing here? You call me an anti vaxxer, I'm going to call you an epidemic denier. How does that feel? Doesn't feel so good, does it? Here's what he says about the fact that there is an autism epidemic.

[Patrick Bet David]

Epidemic denial has become a feature in the mainstream media and it's based on an industry canard. And obviously there are people who don't want us to look at environmental exposures. I want to just read you some of the little excerpts from some of the older studies. The baseline for autism in this country was established with the biggest, largest epidemiological study in history. A study of all 900,000 children in the state of Wisconsin, children under the age of 12. They found 0.7%, 0.7 children had autism in every 10,000. That's less than 1 in 10,000. Today we're 1 in 31. That study also confirmed the 4 to 1 male to female ratio. There were at that time just over 60 children in Wisconsin with autism. And today it's around 20,000. In 1987, it was another exhaustive study. A peer reviewed study in North Dakota set out to count every child in the state with a pervasive developmental disorder, including autism. That study meticulously combed through every record, every diagnosis, and even conducted in person assessments of the entire population of 180,000 children under 18. The autism rate they found was 3.3 per 10,000. That's in line with the 1 in 10,000 that was found in Wisconsin 17 years earlier. For context, today the last number of 1 in 36 is 83 times higher. In 1987, out of every 1 million kids, 300 were diagnosed with autism. Today there are 27,777 for every million. If you accept the epidemic deniers narrative, you have to believe that researchers in North Dakota miss 98.8% of the children with autism. Thousands of profoundly disabled children were somehow in the to doctors, teachers, parents and even their own study. The same researchers who followed the original cohort for 12 years double checked their number. They went back in 2000 and found that they had missed exactly one child. Doctors and therapists in the past were not stupid. They weren't missing all these cases. The epidemic is real.

[Clayton Morris]

Okay, yeah. People in the chat are like, yeah, what about, you know, the Amish people that have no autism at all? That's not true. They have a like way less. But they do. There's cases of autism in the Amish community. It's not zero, but it's significantly less. So why. Maybe we should figure that out.

[Natalie Morris]

Well, I have lingering questions from this report and it's this. From this report is not appropriate to jump to any conclusions. And Secretary Kennedy did not, he did not talk about vaccines. He talked about environmental factors. He says that there is a canard. There are people who don't want them to look into environmental factors. But we have suspicions, of course of toxins in the water, toxins in the food. Yes. Toxins in medicines that we take in vaccines. Those are questions that we should be asking, not actively avoiding while our children suffer because we are too scared to look in that right direction. He said in a statement. Autism is preventable and it is unforgivable that we have not yet identified the underlying causes. And we should have had these answers 20 years ago. Refusing to look into those questions has made our children suffer. So we should feel very guilty for that. Collectively, I still have many lingering questions. For instance from the report, why would some states have such higher rates states than others? It's not just because these states are bigger, but why do they have more incidents per 1,000 people? California, super high incidence of autism. What do Californians do that maybe people in Texas do not? That leads to triple in some cases, quadruple. If you look at the type of autism diagnosis. Pennsylvania. What? What are you guys doing there? What is it? Right. I don't have answers. I'm just asking. Someone needs a hypothesis. Also, what could explain that some Ethnic groups have growing rates of autism that are growing faster than whites. It says overall prevalence among black, Asian and Hispanic children in this group was 3.5%, 3.11, 3.82, respectively, compared to just 2.04among white children. So what's happening in these minority groups that is not happening again? I. I don't have the answers. It can't all be one thing. It has to be a confluence of. Of several different things. And these are things that we need to look into. And he's saying now we will. He didn't specific. He didn't specify how, though.

[Clayton Morris]

One of the research reports that I studied or that I looked at on the Amish, because people are saying, no, there's zero in the Amish community. That's not true unless there's some new study that shows it's zero. But a study from 2008, 2009 looked at thousands of Amish children in Ohio and Indiana. And out of these, only 25 children had autism. Thousands of kids they looked at only 25 and seven were confirmed with a diagnosis using standard diagnostics tools. So it's about 1 in 271 out of this group, rather than 1 out of 31, what RFK Jr just said, which is remarkable.

[Natalie Morris]

But given these trends, I don't know. What would your hypothesis be? Why California? Why are you suffering so much from autism in California?

[Clayton Morris]

Yeah, people are saying chemtrails, maybe, heavy metals in the air, heavy, heavy toxic chemicals in the air. You know, we were in Los Angeles last week, my son and I, and I said as we came through the Sepulveda Pass, you come down or you come north. Yeah, you come up from Burbank, come down through the Sepulveda Pass. I said, I warned him. I said, you're going to see Los Angeles for the first time. Are you going to see Santa Monica area? And you're going to see, like, massive amount of haze just floating over it, smog, and also onshore flow and other things like that. But, yeah, just all these, like, heavy metals just like floating in the atmosphere right there. And we came through the pass, and my son goes, holy smokes. Like, you could see just like this mist, you know?

[Philip]

Yeah, I've only been there. I've only been to LA once, and I. And that was the one of the first things I said when we got off the plane. I was like, oh, my God, you can taste it. You can taste la, like, just in the air. It's just like I. I did not care for it.

[Clayton Morris]

And of course, that's just la, but it's massively populated. I mean, I will say, oh, no.

[Natalie Morris]

I'm from the northern. I'm from Northern California. San Francisco Bay Area. We could regularly have blackout days on PE because the smog was too bad.

[Clayton Morris]

Geez. So, yeah, so maybe that's part of it. I don't know exactly. No. But we need to get to the bottom of it for sure. One in 31 children. And I like his take on this, that you're an epidemic denier. If you don't want to call attention to it. Yeah, it's absolutely the case.

[Natalie Morris]

Let's use that. If someone pushes back and says, oh, it's not these things. Okay, you're an epidemic denier. How do you like that?

[Clayton Morris]

How do you like the.

[Natalie Morris]

How do you like the name calling? I will use it.

[Clayton Morris]

All right, we got more news to get to you. We're going to chat here in a second, but first. Yeah. You want to tell us about our friends at American Financing.

[Natalie Morris]

Why don't you do that?

[Clayton Morris]

Oh, sure. Well, with everything that's happening in the economy, it feels like we're all walking on shaky ground. Prices stuck at a really high level. Seems like nothing is affordable anymore. It's no wonder many are relying on credit cards to cover the gaps. Credit card debt is skyrocketing, and it's leaving a lot of people stressed out. If you're a homeowner, you don't have to face this uncertainty alone. Our friends at American Financing can help you take. They can help you access the equity in your home to help you pay down that high interest credit card debt, giving you peace of mind and real savings. On average, people just like you are saving 800amonth, plus, they may close your loan in as little as 10 days. So don't let the chaos of the economy get the best of you. Call American Financing now. It costs you nothing to get started. And you may delay two mortgage payments, just giving you the cushion in this uncertain time. Here's their phone number on your screen. 866-890-8434. Give them a call today. Again, that's 866-890-8438 today or visit American financing.net/redacted. All right, so, yeah, some people in the chat were saying, because I guess on YouTube, YouTube has placed ads, like in the live stream now. And I just went through and. And they defaulted. Turn those on. So I made sure to turn those off, guys. So, like, YouTube is placing ads on top of the four, like we usually have three or four sponsors in our show. Like, that's it for the, you know, the show. If you watch like a show on mainstream Media, there's like 25 in the commercial break. So we have four that sponsor our show. We're independent, so we don't have, you know, we're not, we're not billionaires around here. But then YouTube was like putting ads on top of our ads, so we just had to go in and shut that off.

[Philip]

So if you saw that, that's usually, that's been defaulted to off. So that must be something. YouTube has recently decided to, they do like to quietly default back to the thing that makes them the most money.

[Clayton Morris]

I think they do that. They, they like will send, they'll, they'll send out stuff. They're like, oh, they, we've just changed it now. We've gone back and defaulted. We're going to shove some things in your content here. So, yeah, Panda says you have about 10 sponsors with a lot of exclamation marks. No, we don't. We have three or four per show, FYI. Yeah. Father dad says, yeah, you're. Your ads are fine. It's the YouTube one that kills me. Yeah, I'm. Yeah. Anyway, but we just, we saw that was happening because I saw some people are saying like, yeah, there's ads on top of your ads. I'm like, what. What the hell's going on here? So anyway, we shut that down. But anyway, hey, our friends at Rumble, you don't have to worry about that. They don't do that crap. So. And Rumble is a free speech platform. So we are live on Rumble as well, thanks to all of our Rumblers who support us there. You guys have seen the light. We have almost 30,000 of you watching us right now on Rumble. Isn't that amazing? So I think the shift is really happening. People are sick and tired of YouTube and they're sick and tired of what they do and censorship and Rumble has become really the go to free speech platform. So, yeah, we're almost at 30,000 of you watching us right now on Rumble, which is great. And we've, we've started to really see a lot of people moving away, you know, from, from the old, the old legacy stuff and they're moving over. So, yeah, come on over and follow us on, on redacted on, on Rumble and be a part of our team over there. Noel says Rumble has ads. Yeah, they do have ads when you like sign in. I don't think they play them during a show, though. They don't just like randomly shove them in during a live stream, do they? They like if you click on a video to watch they'll do like pre roll ads. But they don't just shove them in randomly as you're watching the show, do they? I don't know. Yeah, I don't know about that. But thank you guys for subscribing. Wherever you subscribe. If you guys still use YouTube, that's great. You know, we're, we're still there and but we are massively on Rumble. We're on X as well. You can watch us there. And we're on Twitch as well, trying to expand a little. Do do a little bit more on, on Twitch. I need to learn that platform a little bit. So yeah, someone's saying yeah, Quantum Chrome chromo says yeah, YouTube shoves ads into videos. Yeah, they are saying they do not do it during the live show. So yeah, Rumble does not do it during the live show. Also Rumble Premium is great. So if you guys want to sign up for Rumble Premium, it supports free speech and they are fantastic. I mean Rumble is supporting independent content creators in a way that no other platform is. So if you guys want to support Rumble Premium, I think it's like five bucks a month for Rumble Premium and you get no ads. Then it just supports the, supports the platform. Hey, tomorrow on the show Ashton Forbes is going to be here. He just texted me and said he's going to join us on the show tomorrow. So we are going to be having Ashton Forbes on to talk about about this time travel stuff. These glasses got crushed so we're going to do that tomorrow. I'm very excited to talk to Ashton, good friend of the show and he's a genius. I love talking with Ashton. He was really the one that led the charge of course on uncovering the really the COVID up over the disappearance of Malaysian flight MH370 which you know, as we've gone into great lengths to show you where the aircraft was literally teleported right out of the sky using these advanced technologies. Now I saw someone in the chat says earlier like, oh, that that airplane video you showed has been totally debunked. Nope, it has not. Just follow Ashton on X and he'll explain how it's not been debunked at all. In fact, the opposite is true. So anyway, but we're not really going to talk about MH3 70 tomorrow. We're going to talk about this time travel stuff and what the White House is. The Trump administration has just admitted about having Technologies that manipulate time and space. I don't know about you guys, but I think we're on the threshold of something big. We, I think all of you who watch our show know that the United States government has these technologies. We've had them for decades. The ability to manipulate time and space, all of that. You know that to be the case. I think you guys are enlightened in that way. Not. Not idiots. But when will they tell us? When will they show it to us? It would completely upend all of the energy infrastructure that we pay hundreds of dollars a month to, you know, pay for our energy. Right. Every month so we'd have free etheric energy that Tesla discovered and added all his documents taken from the FBI after he died. They don't want you to have free energy. Right. It would completely upend everything. And yet it exists and we have the technology and the federal government has it in its possession. I'd love to hear about it. It. So hopefully, I feel like we're on the precipice of something big. Hopefully. Anyways, guys, thank you guys so much for subscribing, being a part of our show here on this Wednesday. We're live every day at 4pm Eastern time. Natalie had to duck out and pick up the kids at the bus stop. Much love to all of you guys. We'll be back here tomorrow at 4pm Eastern Time. Ashton Forbes is going to join us to talk about time travel and whatever else other crazy news is happening in the world. We will be covering it for you if the mainstream media ignores it. And have a great night, everyone.