← Redacted News
Redacted News
"This was a CIA hit!" Charlie Kirk's Assassination Story COLLAPSES Amid New Evidence | Redacted
01:18:24
Loading summary
Transcript156 lines
- [00:00]
A
Welcome everyone to redacted on this Tuesday. I'm Clayton Morris.
- [00:03]
B
I'm Natalie Morris.
- [00:04]
A
And on this show we follow the truth wherever it may lead us. And sometimes it's very uncomfortable. And we're going to cover right now the CIA and intel connection to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. But most people are missing the 30,000 foot level view of all of this, which matches tons of patterns with the CIA and the intel agencies. And of course they all work together like Mossad and MI6. And the CIA really don't operate independently. So Colonel Watkins is gonna join us because the patterns are very striking. And we're gonna dive deep into the intel connections to the assassination.
- [00:38]
B
We're gonna bring you an update on the Canadian ostrich farm as well because the Canadian government is not letting this go. They want those birds dead despite no proof of bird flu. So we're gonna talk to journalist David Crayden from Canada. We're also gonna talk about continued attacks on Christians in Syria and in other places. And a new study showing that cancer has been over diagnosed in young people. Why that's a problem, why chemotherapy has been oversold and is ruining lives. We have a doctor on to talk about that shocking study. But before we do that, we want to tell you about our friends over@120life.com because did you know that high blood pressure is the number one risk factor for mortality? One in two adults have it. So that's a 50, 50% chance that you are a walking time bomb. But here are the good news is that you have the power to take control naturally with 120 life. It is a blend of great tasting super fruit juices that can actually help lower your blood pressure naturally. 120Life is formulated with ingredients that have been shown to support healthy blood pressure levels. Trusted by over a thousand health professionals and used by people just like you who've seen real measurable results. Now you can try it for a risk free 2 week trial. Just go to 120life.com, use the code redacted R E D A C T E d redacted to save 5015 off. And you can track your progress with a simple blood pressure monitor. Watch your numbers drop. Feel the difference. Completely risk free. If you don't see lower numbers in two weeks, you get your money back. So you have nothing to lose except high blood pressure numbers. So go to 120Life. That's one two zero. Type out the number but write out the word L I F E.com redacted 120Life.com redacted. Use the code. Redacted for 15 off. Don't wait. Take control of your health today.
- [02:27]
A
Well, we need to stop right now and take a 30,000 foot level view of Charlie Kirk's assassination. Why did they do it? Why do they want us in the weeds? Focusing on small details and we've certainly covered the small details here on the show and we're not ashamed of that. I think we need to look at those small details. But it's becoming crystal clear that the CIA and the three letter agency connections to the Charlie Kirk assassination are growing too obvious to ignore at this point. Use Tyler Robinson as a patsy. Use a convenient trans cover story. Admit that you have overwhelming digital data that you present during a court hearing yesterday. So much so that you'll need a delay because there's just so much information. 5 days is not enough with all of the digital information that we have on Tyler Robinson. Too much. The CIA of course is really good at planting digital evidence as we know. Allowing cameras in the courtroom, by the way, to help sell your story. Former CIA agents, CIA whistleblowers, all admitting that this has all the hallmarks of a CIA or intel operation. Just yesterday on our show, former CIA agent Larry Johnson said the very same thing.
- [03:34]
C
I never discount the power of my old organization to be involved with a.
- [03:41]
A
Lot of nefarious activity. But as many of you know, UVU has deep ties to the CIA. Here's a brief overview by P of Arma Watch.
- [03:51]
D
Okay, so here's what's interesting. Utah State University, where Robinson studied briefly, has stronger than average CIA and Israel ties. Driven by its center for Anticipatory Intelligence, the cai, the nation's first such program offering unique undergraduate and graduate credentials. Led by ex CIA analyst Jeannie Johnson & Co founded by former CIA assistant director Matt Barrett. Making it a rare intelligence hub outside D.C. elites like Georgetown. Robinson attended USU for one semester in 2021 as a pre engineering major before dropping out. USU also secures over $2.4 million in U.S. israel research grants. My next questions would be did Robinson know anyone at cai? Did he take any classes with any professors? Why did he drop out? And who organized the Turning Point USA event?
- [04:42]
A
Yeah, usu, not uvu. Pretty important distinction, but nonetheless. Interestingly, Husselbich found that uvu, CIA spy school profiles were erased after the assassination. Rusty Neads, a former CIA officer, professor of Utah Valley's University center for National Security Studies, had his profile just totally disappeared. And among others, we now know that right after the assassination, the School suddenly rooms six more professors since Charlie Kirk's assassination, all with ties to the intelligence and security apparatus, especially at the school. John Cullen also has a lot of interesting questions about the spy drones, the spy planes over Charlie Kirk's assassination. We have military spy planes launching drones, drones over the place at Charlie Kirk's killing. Plane arrives three hours early, drops to 200, slows to a minimum speed. Multiples, multiple drones. And why were these spy planes flying overhead at the time? Joining us now is Colonel Roxanne watkins, a retired U.S. air Force officer who spent 30 years in military service, including time at U.S. central Command and the Pentagon. She brings firsthand insight into the intelligence operations and how nefarious they are. Colonel, great to see you here. Sorry for the little technical hiccup at the beginning of the show. Thanks for your patience.
- [06:03]
E
Thanks for having me.
- [06:05]
A
So I think it's important obviously to look at some of the smaller details, the nuances that we've been looking at over the past few weeks. But, but I think one of your specialties is that 30,000 foot level and connecting the patterns here. Everyone's been in the weeds, the trans story, Israel story, Mossad story, all these little pieces. But can you take the 30,000 foot level approach here? And why this looks has all the hallmarks of an intel job.
- [06:31]
E
So originally when you and I started communicating this morning and you were like, why? And that's the question that a lot of people need to have answered. And through the research that I've been doing, one of the fundamental principles is a thing called strategy of tension. And it is to keep populations divided, keep them in silos and to keep them from talking to each other. Because what happens is when people talk to each other, they oftentimes find that they have a lot of commonalities and develop like an esprit de corps among them. And you cannot control people if they have commonalities. And so dividing them up into all of these different entities, whether it's trans versus non trans or black versus white, the CIA has had a pattern, a history of sending what we would refer to as advon teams into countries that they want to destabilize and overthrow and finding out what their Achilles heel is. Where's the dividing lines in that country, whether it's in Africa and it has to do with tribal history, whatever it is, because they're going to use that in order to divide the population. And if you go back in history to the, the 1960s and all of the turmoil that was going on there, you find lots of Commonalities. You had people like Fred Hampton, where if you just do a cursory look at him, everybody called him a Marxist and said, you know, he was really a bad guy. But what he had started doing that made him a threat was he built a thing called the Rainbow Coalition. And it had the lower class people, regardless of what their ethnic background, was, talking to each other. And he took poor whites, poor blacks and Hispanics and was building coalitions all over the country. Well, one day he gets drugged and his house is stormed by the FBI and they assassinate everybody in the house. And you, you look at RFK and his campaign in 1968, the same thing. He was building bridges to communities that was going to coalesce around his message. He just had won the last primary that basically guaranteed him the Democrat nomination in the 1968 election. And he gets assassinated. We can look at JFK, same thing. He's reaching out. While RFK concentrated more internally to the United States, JFK built coalitions around the world. He had reached out to Indonesia, he had reached out to France in their battle with keeping Algeria as a colony. And Charles de Gaulle, the Prime Minister, President of France, was very much in favor of giving Algeria their freedom. And, and JFK was very instrumental in supporting that initiative. And the, the people that are controlling all of this, I refer to them as the International Syndicate. They're the ones that direct the intelligence agencies. A lot of people think that the intelligence agencies work for their government. It is my proposition that they have never worked for their government. They work for this oligarch and they take instructions from them. And that's why, to your point, that you just made people look. Because they think the intelligence agencies support the government, that they're somehow different and controlled by their government. There's actually been multiple occasions where the CIA, despite anything that was told to them to do by the President, has went out on their own and did whatever they wanted to do. And they work across intelligence agencies with MI6 kind of sitting at the head of it. And what I have come to believe, just based on the research is, and using the strategy of tension as kind of that umbrella, the placement of Israel in Israel. If you go back to the founding of Israel, there were multiple sites that were considered for where that was going to be set up a homeland for the Jewish people. They picked specifically Israel because it allowed them to implement a strategy of tension and control the Middle East. And of course, this is, you know, around the time where they've discovered large oil deposits all over that area. And by having Israel located where it is today, it was very advantageous to this group of international syndicate people to implement control. And so if you carry that forward and you look at what happens in the United States, every time something seems to be going very well, you have this explosion of something. For example, in the 1990s, you had Ruby Ridge, you had Waco, you had Timothy McVeigh at Oklahoma. And that started the mantra of white nationalist Christians and how they were tied to domestic terrorism. There was a restrictive law that was passed immediately after 1995 in Oklahoma. And then you move forward to 911 and you get more and more regulations and laws passed that keeps constricting our freedoms. And to your point that you made earlier when we were talking, that's the push towards one world government is you have to.
- [12:38]
A
Right. So the digital id, the digital id, the sort of palantir wetting its lips over the past week or two weeks, there's been an explosion of digital ID tracking. Related Stories Vietnam just seized 86 million bank accounts to move them to biometric scanning. It's for our safety kernel. Right. We need to be tracked and monitored. And what better way to do it than have us all worried about the next assassination fomenting this descent, having truck bombs going off inside of churches. We need to be tracked. We need it for our safety. We need this digital strategy.
- [13:14]
B
But I mean what you're implying, and I'm not refuting this, but it's terrifying to think about that there are powerful people operating separate of our electorate who said, that guy Charlie Kirk, he's gotta go because it would be infinitely useful to us. And somebody marked him people that and he trusted the U.S. government. And so that I find, not that it's not hard, it's easy to digest, but terrifying to actually understand. Do you know what I mean?
- [13:43]
E
So again, it's not the US Government per se. There are elements embedded in the US Government that are orchestrating all of this, obviously. But it's not the collective US Government because again, I was part of it. I was never part of this. But sure, and that's the part I think most people struggle with, is they want to collectively say it's the entire government. When my observations is that the CIA has never taken directions from the US Government. Have we had compliant presidents that kind of basically gave them full reign? Yes. I talk about those people as being the selected people, but occasionally you had like JFK people that went against their direction, their agenda, and bad things happen to those people. I think Trump is an example of that during his first term, he would not have been under constant attack for four years with coup after coup after coup. And had he been doing their bidding, they let people who do their bidding sit in that seat unopposed. And you have only to look at Biden and George Bush and George Bush Senior and blah blah, blah. So I do think that it is terrifying once you, once that realization kind of sinks in. But let me speak just for a minute about the Charlie Kirk specifically. So one of the. And this has been true for 80 years, one of the main thrust that the CIA has focused on is our university system. There has been university after university, Harvard, Yale, Columbia, that have had institutions set up. And you just mentioned the cai, which I think is hilarious since it's kind of the CIA disguised that are literally funded through covert means by the CIA. They function. Henry Kissinger had one set up at Harvard and years later it was outed as actually being a CIA front. And all they did once it got exposed as a CIA front was took his deputy, created another institution on Harvard and put her over there in charge and just removed Henry Kissinger's name. So these things have existed for a very, very long time. And the CIA recruits at any university. And Utah is a great recruiting ground. You can go through article after article of CIA presence on primarily Mormon campuses. And that's not a slight against the religion, but because Mormons are required to learn multiple languages and go to other countries. And so by the time you get into college, you have all of this basket of skill sets that the CIA literally drools over. And so they are a target. And that kind of plays into that. But I don't want anybody to think that the few examples that the one video woman was addressing is a unique thing. It is not the CIA. And let me just give you an example. In Vietnam, the Office of Public Safety under USAID set up a program at Michigan State University and also a satellite at Indiana University, which disturbed me deeply because that's my Alma material. And the staff was 100% CIA agents. And they picked that staff up from Michigan State University and deployed it under the guise of a program from that university and plopped it down into Vietnam, which blossomed into the Phoenix program. If you were to go back and look at normal history, you'd go, oh, that was just a bunch of professors over there trying to teach the cops how to be cops. It was not. And if you do any research into the Office of Public Safety, you find out that they recruited police chiefs from across and senior police officers, which then goes to the corruption of police entities in the United States, which you have to know exist. Because again, I'll skip over to Los Angeles, just do a research or a search on the Internet, not on Google of Los Angeles Police Department and CIA. You're going to get a ton of articles written about the fact that the CIA had infiltrated the Los Angeles Police Department in a particular intelligence unit there. During the 1980s, late 70s and 80s when the crack cocaine explosion happened in Los Angeles, they knowingly targeted black neighborhoods with tons and tons of cocaine. And again, that information is all out there. So you have corruption at the local level. The Office of Public Safety under usaid, which was a CIA front, hired police chiefs and senior police officials to deploy all over the world and set up national police forces. And the national police forces were known for torture, assassination and all kinds of atrocities.
- [19:35]
A
Unbelievable. You're blowing my mind. I knew about the crack piece of this. I didn't know that deep level connection there and I didn't know the university connection at this level. Just going through the research now, it's unbelievable to me how just widespread this is. It's not just, as you pointed out, just dedicated to those few profiles that she was highlighting in that video as it relates to other patterns within the CIA and why this was an intel hit. What connections do you see to similar hits that have been carried out before? The use of a patsy. The digital dumping of information, you know, yesterday at the hearing. So we have so much digital information.
- [20:11]
B
On here, it feels like purposeful chaos.
- [20:13]
A
Yeah. That we have to delay the hearing because we just got so much, much digital stuff that we found.
- [20:19]
E
So you go back to the JFK assassination and that's what it was all about. Let's focus on all of the details. Now. Obviously we didn't have social media, which kind of adds to a layer of confusion for their side, but the, the focus on every little detail that came out. The, the gun, the bullets, the, the limousine. So they're going to leave all of these pieces out there for people. And of course the media runs cover for all of it, basically saying that, you know, oh, that's a conspiracy. That's a conspiracy. If anybody tries to zoom out and tries to articulate. There's some common denominators here. What I found most interesting when I was doing the research into the assassination of Martin Luther King is I was unaware that like two decades, two and a half decades later, there was a civil suit which they, the family won, that basically said it was a conspiracy, that it was not a lone Gunman. And again, during that assassination, everybody was fixated on all of the little details because what they will do is they put out enough details for people to start arguing about. And the arguing of well, this bullet went this way or that way allows people air time. And then you get tired of it after you've heard all of the opposing points where again, nobody zooms out and goes, hey guys, this looks exactly like this one over here.
- [21:59]
A
Great point. Yeah, everyone's, everyone's fixated on the bullets. Oh, there was trans writings on the bullets. Yeah, you know, the discord chat, the gun found in the woods. You know, he's a Dairy Queen. Like all these like little nuggets spaced out. And then don't ask me questions.
- [22:16]
B
How do we filter all of that? Because so much of it sounds too stupid. Like how do we filter this information? How do you do it?
- [22:27]
E
I, I do not tend to spend very much time. The inconsistencies was all I needed to hear because of the greater umbrella of strategy, of tension. So if you have a very effective communicator that is pulling people together and he can articulately refute the divisions that in my opinion are not there, they're artificial. And he was an excellent person at doing that. He was very effective at refuting the CIA propaganda media piece. You got to go. And that's the piece they don't want you to see. And again, you look past back through history and you find out that all of the coalition builders had the same fate.
- [23:26]
A
Someone in our chat room said, well, first of all, they think you're fantastic and pay attention to what you're saying. But somebody else is saying the CIA is self funded so they can operate really at will outside of, as you pointed out, the US federal government. So when we say the government killed him, the government killed him. Not really. Sort of extracurricular government killed him. Right.
- [23:48]
E
So when the CIA was created in the immediate aftermath of that, and I've done a lot of research on this, the Stay behind network, which was going to be a network in Europe and in the United States that was going to be able to be these chaos creators was fielded using Rockefeller and the Marshall Plan money. And that was their initial seed money to get this organization set up to be used by the intelligence agencies all through NATO. But because they didn't have a long term sustainment funding mechanism for the covert operations, they sponsored, for lack of a better word, a guy over in China by the name of Chiang Kai Shek and he was the leading warlord, opium pusher in China that was taking the Indian opium brought over from the. The UK was kind of the push behind it into China. And that was the whole. One of the large segments of the Chinese revolution with, in addition to communism, Mao didn't want any opium there. So he. He eventually, obviously won the civil war, pushed Chiang Kai Shek out. And the CIA eventually, through a couple of other countries, set Chiang Kai Shek up in China or in Taiwan. And Taiwan had formerly been referred to as Formosa. And so one day they just changed the sign and say, we're going to call you Taiwan. This is your new president. And he immediately implemented martial law. And again, I had no idea. I didn't learn this in any of the degrees that I've gotten, all of which required history, that Chiang Kai Shek immediately implemented martial law. And they lived under martial law for the next 40 years. And that's because he was basically the opium king. At one point, he supplied the world 80% of the world's opium from all over Asia, channeling it to Europe and the United States and other places. And so that funding stream of the drug operations is what seeded the COVID funding. It was initially laundered primarily only through the Vatican bank, but then they set up fake banks like BCCI and Nugent Hand and several other banks. And so they have a completely different stream of money that is completely unaccounted for.
- [26:20]
B
Gosh.
- [26:20]
A
I mean, the seed money for the CIA funneled through the Vatican bank from Chiang Kai Shek, Chinese Nationalist leader pushed out by Mao. It's unbelievable, but not shocking.
- [26:32]
B
And in fact, some of that is in the information about the. What I would allege is the assassination of Pope John Paul I, who was smelling that out.
- [26:43]
E
Yeah.
- [26:45]
B
And who was the smiling Pope who lived for a full one month, had no pre existing conditions, and died peacefully in his sleep.
- [26:54]
A
Colonel, before we get you out of here, because so many people in our chat room are like, you know, it's Mossad, it's Mossad, it's Mossad. I mean, we just see the chats, you know, it's Mossad, it's Mossad. And I think your point is, I don't want to put words in your mouth, was they're inseparable.
- [27:07]
B
It's trickier than that.
- [27:07]
A
Like, it's not so. But can you. Yeah. Talk about that?
- [27:10]
E
So if you move from the drug operations in Asia, then they moved to Afghanistan, and what was called the. I'm losing my. The. It's the golden crescent. So Golden Triangle is in Asia. Golden Crescent is in Afghanistan. It included Turkey, Iran, and Afghanistan. Then they moved to the Crystal triangle, which was Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia. So if you look specifically at Colombia, and that's my best illustration of how collectively they work, there was no distance between Mossad, the idea, the Brits in their MI6 and SAS and the CIA and our special forces in Colombia. Here's how they work it. So you have these intelligence people that are working. They set up basically what became a narco elite, and they buy off all of the government, and they set up Colombia as a narco state. And you have these. Again, the whole separation thing comes into play here. We have the Medellin cartel, which we were told, you know, and then we have the Cali cartel in Colombia. Well, the. And they want to focus on one. They always focus on the Medellin cartel. Very rarely do you hear people talk about the Cali Cartel, because the Cali cartel was owned basically by the state. The Medellin Cartel with Pablo Escobar had decided they were going to do business differently than what the CIA was telling them they had to do. And who comes in and sets up the munitions factory? Israel. The Galil rifle literally set up an ammunition plant and the production of the Galil rifle to arm all of these narco terrorists that we were told was their national police. And fighting against this mysterious FARC in Colombia, where, if you look at the farc, while they caught all the crap and was the focus of all of the billions of dollars in the Colombian plan that we poured into during Clinton and everybody else afterwards, that money was going to train, basically assassins to do whatever they want. They staged, like, they had a. A fake lab that they literally killed a FARC member, took his uniform off and put it in there so they could take pictures of it to say the FARC was responsible for all these labs and all the cocaine's coming to the United States, when that was never the case.
- [29:56]
A
Jeez Louise.
- [29:57]
B
I mean, we could just keep pulling this thread for the whole rest of the show, but.
- [30:01]
A
No, I think it's important. I think the reason I wanted to have you on, and I'm glad you're able to set this date. We get so caught up in the little details, but they want us talking about. The bullet had this written on it. This was over here, but at the head of it. This was an intel hit job. And this has all the hallmarks of an intel hit job. And they want us sewing this type of division because this is exactly how they thrive. And then we're going to be moving to a digital ID system and a biometric scanning system. You won't be able to access the Internet. As our friend of the show, Whitney Webb, likes to point out, you won't be accessing the Internet without having this digital ID tracking so they can monitor everything you're doing and total control, so. And again, Colonel, we could talk for hours and I'd love to have you back. Hopefully you'll come back soon. Thank you so much for joining us here. And by the way, I should point out, Colonel and I did a really a long interview on Operation Gladio a couple of weeks ago here on the show. I encourage all of our audience to go and watch that interview. It's jaw dropping and eye opening. Colonel, great to see you. Thank you so much for your time today. We really appreciate it.
- [31:03]
E
Thank you for inviting me.
- [31:06]
A
Our pleasure. Thank you so much, Colonel.
- [31:07]
B
Always.
- [31:08]
A
All right, we got a lot more to talk about.
- [31:11]
B
Yeah, it's so hard to keep that straight in your mind, but when you've seen these little threads and you're like, well, I believe that one and that one, it's not that hard to start to believe the connection. So we're gonna leave it with that.
- [31:20]
A
All right, coming up, we're gonna talk about Canada's ostrich killing. Because, man, the rcmp, they sent trucks today full of hay bales. They are ready to kill these ostriches. But the Supreme Court in Canada could be hearing this case as early as Thursday, we hope. But the police are still harassing, harassing them. This all comes right now as Canada wants you to turn in your guns. They want you to turn in your guns. And they are moving towards a digital ID system in Canada as well. It's all about control. We'll talk about that.
- [31:47]
B
But first we want to tell you about our friends over at Venice AI because speak about being all about control. Well, if you've used ChatGPT, if you've used X's AI Grok, you know that those AI are biased and they are trying to control your thought process. They specifically steer you away from wrong. Think Sam Altman, if you didn't see his interview on Tucker Carlson. Watch it. It's dystopic. He says that ChatGPT is gonna get to know your life. And you know it has the former board of director of the NSI say on the board, Edward Snowden has warned about it. So use at your own risk. Risk. But we want to introduce you to an alternative called Venice AI. It's based on open source AI models utilizing leading open source models to Deliver text code and image generation to your browser. No downloads, no installations of any kind. And it's private, it doesn't spy on you and it does not keep your history. The Pro plan unlocks full platform and features, including PDF uploads for summary and sites, the ability to turn off safe mode for un hindered image generation, and the ability to change how it interacts with you by modifying the system prompt. Limitless text, high image, high image limits. So take a look and check it out for yourself. Go to Venice AI redacted and you can get 20% off a pro plan to enjoy private uncensored AI. So you, you know, it's important that we're looking for alternatives to things that track us like this. We saw news yesterday that in fact there are certain foreign nations making investments in AI so in chat GPT specifically so that it gives you different results. So seek out private alternatives, safer alternatives. Go to Venice AI redacted. Get 20% off a pro. A pro plan One more time. That's Venice AI slash redacted.
- [33:42]
F
Progressive knows we all crave validation.
- [33:44]
E
Girl, you are not 37.
- [33:46]
A
I would have guessed 27.
- [33:47]
B
You guys are too sweet.
- [33:48]
G
Sure.
- [33:49]
H
Dewy skin.
- [33:50]
A
Terrific.
- [33:51]
E
Is something wrong, Ned?
- [33:52]
G
Why would you ask?
- [33:52]
A
Just because Today marks my 10th anniversary without a car accident or even a speeding ticket. But somehow tonight's all about your skin care. Wow.
- [34:01]
F
With snapshot from Progressive, you can get a personalized rate based on how you drive. And that's all the validation you need. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliate snapshot not available in California from all agents. Surcharge possible for unsafe driving.
- [34:12]
A
Well, Canada is turning into an authoritarian hell hole right before our eyes. It appears the killing of 400 ostriches is imminent unless someone steps in to stop it. Canada now wants to take away your guns and move towards a full digital ID system. You can't walk in the woods there without getting a fine. The RCMP and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the cfia, which is a criminal organization of Canada, have ordered the killing of 400 ostriches at the Universal Ostrich Farm near Edgewood, British Columbia. These birds, of course, have been a viral cause in Canada right now. And the owner of the farm, Katie Pasitney, is begging because it looks like the RCMP is trying to get these animals and kill them within maybe the next 48 hours. Hopefully the Supreme Court will step in. But she's pleading for President Trump to try to help.
- [35:05]
E
Mr. Trump, President Trump. This is a cry out, a plea from Canada. Please stop the slaughter of almost 400 healthy ostriches that are going to suffer today or tomorrow. We need a miracle. The world has been calling on a miracle.
- [35:26]
A
Now the CFIA has seized control of the farm. It's cut off access. It's constructing a massive death pen right now, complete with hay bales to exterminate these healthy birds. Today we saw another truck full of hay bales pulling up and there's trucks in the way. Basically tell them to screw off. And they. By the way, these hay bale trucks have no. Like, they're covering up their license plates as well. Like they're trying to hide. They don't. I don't know. I don't think these truckers really want to be a part of this. I don't know. David Creighton, independent journalist in Canada, has been following the story from the very beginning. He's been one of the loudest voices on this and he's really gotten the attention of a lot of the international media on this. So, David, welcome back to the show. Thank you for your voice in all of this. Where do things stand right now, first on the ostrich story?
- [36:11]
G
Well, I just had a text from Katie not 10 minutes ago, and she was on my show this morning and she said, make sure you make it clear that the Supreme Court, if it says no, and it could say no within the next 48 hours, the CFIA, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which you quite correctly identified as a criminal and terrorist organization, could begin the slaughter within the next 24 to 48 hours. They've created the slaughter pen because they don't want anybody to see what they're doing. They have taken so much hay at taxpayer expense that there's actually a shortage of hay for farmers in the area. This is how crazy this is. They want to kill 399 healthy birds. And in the meantime, they have been causing devastation, havoc and chaos on the farm. They have been terrorizing the ostriches, running after them with lassoes, trying to corral them. And they have been doing everything possible to make the birds sick. Not feeding them, not feeding them enough, not feeding them properly, just throwing the food on the ground where they have difficulty eating it. They're not chickens, as Katie has pointed out to me many, many times, not giving them adequate water. What they want is for at least one or two birds to appear sick so they can say, ah, I guess we were right.
- [37:38]
A
So dehydrating them, dehydrating them, killing them, making them sick is the part of the plan.
- [37:45]
G
Yeah, well, these people, Clayton, I really knew nothing about the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. In fact, Katie told me today she really had no dealings with them either because they haven't been using the ostriches for food on this farm for many, many years. And they were never, never bothered. But I've come to know the cfia, as you say, a terrorist criminal organization. These are execution goons. That's all they do. They have no veterinary skills, they have no animal health. They are there as executioners only and they are acting with impunity. They're ignoring animal cruelty laws right now. They're ignoring the rule of law. They are acting as if the Supreme Court said nothing or said go ahead. The Supreme Court said there is a stay. They are behaving as if they're prepared to start shooting at a moment's notice. And I think this is disgusted Canadians across the country. I thought these were just a bunch of faceless bureaucrats, but they're not. This is an execution squad. And they don't seem to be adept at anything else, including caring for animals in the very minimal degree. So I have nothing but contempt for these bureaucrats who are walking around like they own the farm and they own the country. As far as I'm concerned, they're emblematic of this carny liberal regime we have in this country that thinks it can act with impunity about anything and it makes up the rule of law as, as it goes every day.
- [39:20]
B
Well, what do you think they would argue for their jurisdiction? How could they possibly do that given they don't have proof that the birds are sick? Is there something in the Canadian law that would give them some kind of power that the rest of us couldn't anticipate?
- [39:37]
G
They have been granted carte blanche on this operation by the Carney government. You just had a guest on talking about the CIA having extraterritorial extracurricular powers. This is a government agency that has the same kind of powers. They can ignore institutions, they can ignore the law and they just continue to do what they think they need to do. And their policy is to kill these birds. Don't bother us with the facts. We don't need to take test them. And by the way, if you test them, six months in jail, two hundred thousand dollar fine per bird. And we don't need to justify what we're doing. We're just doing it because that's our policy. The policy says so. You know, that's exactly how fascist and Nazi and communist governments throughout history have acted. Don't ask us to explain. Don't ask us why we're killing all these people. It's. It's in the book. It's the policy. It's. The government says so. So we're going to do it. Canada has come down this far. It's an authoritarian state.
- [40:40]
B
But is there. Okay, but I want to talk about the. Like, what can we hang our hat on, though? Is there something in the Canadian law, in Canadian laws that would send them packing? Like, is there something that you specifically are hoping for in terms of saving.
- [40:57]
A
Grace that Katie's hoping for on the farm?
- [41:00]
G
The last hope Katie has legally, judicially, is the Supreme Court of Canada. That's the highest court in the land. And if the Supreme Court looks at this and says, well, there's nothing we can do, then there's something seriously wrong with this country.
- [41:13]
B
Yeah, that's.
- [41:16]
G
You know, and there is. The only other answer here is a political solution, and that's Donald Trump calling up Mark Carney and saying, I don't think this looks good. Stop it now. Now that's a possibility. There's a lot of people working behind the scenes. I have literally called everybody I know or used to know, including people like Pam Anderson, who was a representative, PETA, who's an animal rights activist, and saying, pam, get to the farm. We need to do something about this.
- [41:53]
A
I know RFK has been looking into it. I've sent messages to my friend Tucker. Tucker published a whole story about it this morning in his Morning Morning note, which was great. I know that he was disgusted by it. So I know that there's a groundswell of support here in the United States to stop this from independent journalists and from these great thinkers in the Trump administration like RFK Jr. So talk about totalitarianism. And, David, we'll get you out of here on this. Canada also now moving to get rid of guns. Turn in your guns. But they're saying, oh, it's voluntary, but it's really not voluntary. You have until next year, basically, to turn in your guns. And you see these government goons coming around, you will have no recourse at all. You see what happened in the uk you turn in your guns and then the police come to your door for mean tweets that you post. Mark Carney also over. Over in Europe this week, also calling for digital ID in Canada. So Canada, I'm not wrong when I call it an authoritarian hellhole that it's slipping into right now.
- [42:53]
G
David, you're not. It's becoming exactly like the uk. And why was Mark Carney in London meeting with Herr Keir Starmer. At the same time, Keir Starmer was announcing digital id and the Prime Minister of Australia was there because these are all countries that the globalists target. First of all, these old British Commonwealth countries, they're the first to fall. But here's the plan Mark Carney has, and it involves exactly what you're talking about. Confiscate the last guns we have in Canada. And this gun grab is about the guns farmers use. Once again, this is an attack on agriculture, attack on farmers, just like Stalin and Mao did. And this, the second part of the strategy is absolutely destroy free speech. And Justin Trudeau had a horrible bill in front of Parliament before the last Parliament dissolved It called Bill C68, the online harms Act. Well, Mark Carney, believe this or not, he's got three censorship bills in front of Parliament. Two of them have had first reading. The third is going to be a resurrected Online Harms act, which has the thought crimes component. But let me just read this to you. This is Bill C8, which has been introduced, has gone through first reading. But here's what Bill C8 involves. Bill C8, Mark Carney, can ban anybody from using the Internet, can ban you from talking about how or why you got banned from the Internet, and force you to give all of your personal information that they deem relevant to the government. And you not even allowed to say they've asked to do that. This is a communist state. And of course, the third part, which you discussed, digital id. So we are being surveyed, we're being watched. And this government is even more totalitarian than the Trudeau regime because they have not one, not two, but three pieces of censorship legislation. And I tell you now, and the other Bill C9, is outlawing hate symbols, not just hate speech. We need less hate speech. We need hate speech eradicated from Canada because free speech means you can say things that might be deemed hateful or offensive by somebody. That's what the First Amendment in the US Talks about. That's what Canada needs, less hate speech, more free speech. But Bill C9, any symbol now deemed offensive by somebody is going to be banned. And you could go to jail for life for using a symbol that is being determined by somebody as hateful. And I ask you, is that chaos? Because Jewish people might find a Palestinian flag hateful. Palestinian people might. Arab people might find a Jewish flag hateful. This is going to be a recipe for chaos and judicial confusion.
- [46:06]
A
I have a symbol for the Canadian government. So I have a symbol for. I'm allowed to. It's here it is. That's my symbol for the Canadian government right there. I hope that's considered hateful. You can use that emoji if you like. David Creighton, great to see you as always. My wife trying to, you know, tell me to be nice. Tell me, be nice, be nice.
- [46:26]
G
Well, it's hard. It's hard not to get passionate about this because I'm watching my country go down the tube and the time for objectivity. As a journalist, I've been a mainstream journalist, I've been an independent journalist. The time for objectivity is gone. This is like going to war going. We're having a revolution in this country over our freedom. And unless we speak up now, we're going to lose that freedom. This country is going down the tube and I can't overemphasize that. And I want to get that message out as long as I can before the government stomps me out, because that could be next.
- [47:04]
A
Thank you, David Crayton. Well, we know the censorship is strong in Canada. Absolutely. They block us. Certainly they are on YouTube and so forth. So thank you for that, David. Great to see you. As always, keep us in the loop on what happens with Katie and we'll keep pushing as much as we can to bring awareness to that part of the story. Thank you, David.
- [47:21]
G
Thank you both. We love you, Natalie and Clayton, thank you so much.
- [47:25]
A
See how he hesitated on the Clayton part? We love you, Natalie.
- [47:29]
B
And you too.
- [47:30]
A
And you too. And Natalie, probably because my foul finger language, I totally understand.
- [47:35]
B
Well, I mean, you get what you put out there. You don't put out anything loving.
- [47:38]
A
So I'm not feeling loving about the Canadian government at all in any kind of way. So anyway. All right, we've got to talk about Syria coming up in a moment. Then we're going to talk about cancer being over diagnosed in young people. We've got a chock full show today. We don't censor comments. Someone in the chat room is like, hey, do you guys censor comments? No, YouTube censors comments. We just want to be clear about that. Rumble is a free speech platform as well. But in our chat room, Anthony, who's one of our mods, had to turn on slow Mo mode because we have 30,000 people watching. So the chat just flies by. You can't even read it. So he puts on like slow Mo mode so at least people can read comments. It's a little bit slower. So that's why that happens. Okay. All right, we got to get to all of that in a moment. But First, I want to tell you about real estate investing, because it's never been easier. Right now, is your money working for you? Because the US Dollar is collapsing, Real estate investing has never been easier. Savings account CDs offer low returns, barely keeping up with inflation. The stock market volatile, unpredictable. You know, one day you're up, the next day you're down. If you're tired of watching your hard earned money sit idle or ride the stock market roller coaster, it's time for a better solution. Now, you can invest in in real estate short notes with as little as $500. That's it. You can start with 500 bucks with annualized returns up to 9%. Yes, you heard me correctly. Thousands of you have already taken advantage of this. I'm telling you, it's fantastic. Real estate has been a long proven way to build wealth. It's my favorite way to do it. But for most people, the barriers are so high. I mean, you have to put like $50,000 down and you're buying a $300,000 home. No, no. Now you can invest in real estate short notes as part of a fund with as little as $500, again with rates up to 9%. So here's what you do. And by the way, when you open up your account, you'll get a $50 bonus right in your account. So go to redacted.inc invest today. Sign up for a $50 bonus right now. Take advantage of this special offer. Start earning fixed monthly returns with as little as $500. Get that $50 bonus. Go to redacted.inc.invest.
- [49:40]
F
Progressive knows we all crave validation.
- [49:42]
E
Girl, you are not 37.
- [49:44]
A
I would have guessed 27.
- [49:45]
B
You guys are too sweet.
- [49:46]
G
Sure.
- [49:47]
H
Dewy skin.
- [49:48]
A
Terrific.
- [49:49]
E
Is something wrong, Ned?
- [49:50]
G
Why would you ask?
- [49:51]
A
Just because Today marks my 10th anniversary without a car accident or even a speeding ticket. But somehow. Tonight's all about your skin care. Wow.
- [50:00]
F
With snapshot from Progressive, you can get a personalized rate based on how you drive. And that's all the validation you need. Progressive Casualty Insurance company and affiliate snapshot not available in California from all agents Surcharge possible for unsafe driving.
- [50:11]
A
All right, thank you guys all for subscribing to the channel and being a part of our show. We really appreciate it. And sorry for the little tech issue at the very beginning. That was YouTube's fault, not ours. But Christians are being slaughtered in Syria and the mainstream media completely ignoring the story once again, for days now, in Syria, there's been a systemic, unprecedented massacre of Christians. The killing of Monks, the burning of monasteries, burning of entire Orthodox villages which you can see fires from a distance, I mean, miles away. These Christian villages being burned, Alawite villages, Christian villages, all in Syria. Syrian government isn't doing anything to stop it because this is exactly what they want. Of course, instead of stopping it, they're inviting the new leader of Syria, who's an ISIS terrorist, to the United nations to wine and dine himself, celebrate his new leadership and his clean kept beard and his hair gel. They don't want you to remember what he used to look like. There he is whining and dining with Emmanuel Macron. Christians are taking to the streets in protest of these brutal killings across Syria, saying, we are soldiers of Christ Watch. I'm trying to fight back. But of course they're sitting targets at the moment without any help. Professor Joshua Landis is the Author of syriacomment syriacomment.com and the Director of the center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma. And he joins us now. Professor Landis, great to have you on the show. Thank you so much for being here.
- [51:42]
C
Pleasure being here.
- [51:43]
A
You know, when I see this picture, it just strikes me right in the stomach. And you see this picture of Jelani, you know, at the United nations, all clean kept, you know, bearded, hair gel. People were trying to wipe clean his past as a terrorist. And what hope do these Christians have when you have a leader who's a literal terrorist and not doing anything to stop the slaughtering of Christians?
- [52:06]
C
Well, it is an extraordinary, striking change that's going on in Syria here. In 2003 when the United States invaded Iraq, Jaw Lani left Damascus as a young 21 year old and went to fight the United States in Iraq and he was arrested by Americans. For five years, Petraeus was the lead general there and he joined Al Qaeda, graduated up, became a right hand man to Caliph Baghdadi, the head of ISIS, and was sent to Syria in 2011 to form a branch, a Syrian branch of Al Qaeda called Nusra. And he did that with spectacular results. And it became the most powerful militia in Syria. And we've got to remember the United States was supporting the Syrian opposition at this time, sending in billions of dollars in a number of CIA operations and Defense Department operations to support the opposition. And this head of Al Qaeda was a beneficiary of that because it weakened the Assad regime, became strong. And in December of last year, just nine months ago, he swept into Damascus with his forces, took over, became president and America very quickly recognized him, lifted sanctions and have embraced him and tried to get him to sign a peace agreement with Israel. So it is an extraordinarily sort of rapid change. And it means the minorities of Syria and the Christians are an important minority, but there are others, as you mentioned. The Alawites, 10, 12% of Syria live on the coast. The Druze 3% live in the south, the Kurds up in the north. All of them are terrified today because these Sunni supremacists, this very fundamentalist branch of Sunni Islam has taken power and is really treating the minorities with great disdain. And there have been massacres both on the coast against the Alawites. 17,000 killed in March, in July in the Druze area, about almost 2,000 people were killed. And there's fighting going on today in the Kurdish region. So it's. It's a very fraught situation. Many minorities are leaving Syria every day.
- [54:38]
A
What do we know about the scale of the massacres? You talked about 17,000 Alawites, yet we covered that here on the show a couple of months ago. I mean, I. That's unbelievable. The number, the sheer number of that. And the Christians, how reliable.
- [54:51]
C
Almost every day about 4, 5, 6 Alawites are being killed, Druze are being killed, and Christians too are being persecuted. You know, the Mar Elias bombing in June killed 30 parishioners in this church. 50 some odd others were wounded, badly wounded. The church was burnt down, destroyed by a suicide bomber. The regime said he was part of isis, but other groups said he had been member of the new Defense Department and didn't think that, didn't think that El Shadda, the new president, was, you know, fundamentalist enough and decided to. Decided to bomb this church. So it's a very worrying situation. And unfortunately, Washington is coming out and embracing this guy, lifting sanctions and not telling him that he's got to move towards democracy, that there has to be some kind of decentralization in order to protect these minorities, that he can't just run roughshod over them.
- [55:56]
A
Why do you think the Syrian government is not intervening at all to help these Christians and Alawite communities?
- [56:04]
C
Well, because first of all, there is tremendous sort of ideological disdain for them. Secondly, there's a sense of revenge and there's a desire for revenge because the minorities, by and large, and this is not true across the board, but supported the Assad regime, which was Assad. Bashar Al Assad was an Alawite and he worried that if the Islamists took over, the. The minorities would be persecuted, which in fact they are. And, and so minorities tended to support him. And it became very sectarian. The Sunnis who joined the opposition blame the minorities and believe that the minorities have been spoiled first by the French colonial powers that ruled during the interwar period and later came to power themselves and had their boot on the necks of these Sunni Muslims. So there's deep religious distrust that goes right across this. Now, the Christians always tried to run between the legs of the Alawites and the Sunnis, but by and large.
- [57:14]
A
They.
- [57:14]
C
Were not unhappy to see Assad stay in power because he was secular, he didn't discriminate against the Christians.
- [57:21]
A
Christians were safe. I mean, say what you want about them, but the CIA operation, the fake gas attacks, the CIA operation to overthrow the Assad regime, he's been an inconvenient thorn in their side, aligning with Russia. Friends of Putin, this is a huge problem, of course, for the West.
- [57:41]
C
So, and this has been, you know, this is not just Syria because this has happened in Iraq. This has happened in Lebanon. When you get civil war, when you get the state collapsing and when America overthrew Saddam Hussein. Now, Saddam was a brutal dictator, but Christians were safe there and there were about 3% of Iraq. Today, there's almost no Christians left in Iraq because civil war, people begin preying on each other and you get the rise of this very right wing fundamentalism. And that meant that Christians were discriminated against and often they had an ISIS put, you know, a big end for Nuseri, for, for a Christian, a symbol for Christian on the doors of Christians and, and made them pay Jizya, and often just kill them. So why do you think the Western.
- [58:28]
A
Media, Professor, why do you think the Western media is. And governments are almost completely silent about this. I don't hear the Trump administration talking about it at all. I don't hear the Western media talking about it at all. Flip on Fox News, cnn, nothing. There's no coverage of it. You have to rely on little dog and pony shows like ours.
- [58:48]
C
Well, you're right. And you would think that President Trump was backed by Christian groups would be more outspoken about this, but for some reason he's not. He has embraced, you know, he's embraced. Shut up.
- [59:05]
A
Who?
- [59:05]
C
The Saudis and the Turks said, you know, this is our guy, you need to lift sanctions and let Syria grow again. Which. And he did that and he's embraced.
- [59:14]
A
And we all support that. I mean, death by sanctions, you know, like we call it here on the show, sanctions or weapons of mass destruction.
- [59:22]
C
Most marginalized people.
- [59:24]
A
Yeah, sanctions of mass destruction. So we support that. But killing Christians.
- [59:31]
C
Right. And, and there hasn't been a human cry. And Christian groups have become, you know, they've become, I don't know, they've abandoned the Christians in the Middle east, there's no doubt about it. And they don't have a very strong voice for this. And I think it's gotten, you know, it's, it's, I don't know why exactly it has gotten lost in this struggle.
- [59:54]
A
Oh, it's absolutely devastating. And as you point out, the, the slaughtering of Alawites, of Druze, of Christians continues right now as we are speaking now.
- [60:02]
C
Our Kurdish allies who helped us fight isis, who helped us in Iraq, are on the verge of being abandoned by the United States, which is drawing down his troops and perhaps preparing to leave the region, in which case they're going to get their heads knocked in.
- [60:22]
A
Oh my God. Professor, thank you for this. Thank you for this eye opening discussion. I hope that more people are paying attention to this. And by the way, I mean share this, please clip this out and share this, share this with people in the government, share this with members of Congress. Just tag your representative and say why the hell are Christians being ignored in the Middle east and being slaughtered and we're not doing anything to stop it. Professor, thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate it.
- [60:45]
C
Well, it's a pleasure being here.
- [60:47]
A
Thank you so much. All right, coming up here on the show, we are going to talk about.
- [60:54]
B
We'Re going to talk about a new study that shows an over diagnosis of cancer in young people. Why is that a problem? We're going to tell you. We have a doctor who's been warning about this for a long time. Interesting. Now that mainstream medical research is acknowledging that. But first before we do that, microplastics.
- [61:11]
A
Are infiltrating every part of our lives. Scientists estimate we now could see consume a credit card's worth of plastic every single week in our bodies through our food, water, even the air we breathe. One study found plastic particles in 100% of human lung samples. Nobody is safe from this exposure. But guess what? Even if you get clean and you avoid all like packaged foods, you're still being exposed. But you can opt out. I mean, sorry, you can't opt out. You can't opt out at all because it's all around us. But you can help your gut fight back. Kimchi 1 from Bright Core Nutrition is a potent ally in this toxic world. It's packed with over 900 probiotic strains unique to Kimchi, proven to break down BPA, helping you detox from the inside out. It doesn't just support digestion. It helps protect your cells, your brain, your hormones, your future. Your body was never designed to handle plastic, but your gut was designed to protect you. You just have to give it the right tools. Right now you can get 25% off by using the code redacted if you go to mybrightcore.com redacted but the best part is you can get 50% off if you just pick up the phone. 50% off. Just call them. They're an American company. They love to talk to you. 888-404-6312. You'll get 50% off and free shipping. So call them right now. 888-404-631200.
- [62:30]
I
If you're shopping while working, eating or even listening to this podcast, then you know and love the thr. But are you getting the deal and cash back? Rakuten shoppers, do they get the brands they love? Savings and cash back. And you can get it too. Start getting cash back at your favorite stores like Target, Nike and Instacart. Stack sales on top of cash back and feel what it's like to know you're maximizing the savings. It's easy to use and you can get your cash back sent to you through paypal or check. The idea is simple. Stores pay Rakuten for sending them shoppers and Rakuten shares the money with you as cash back. Download the free Rakuten app or go to rakuten.com to start saving today. It's the most rewarding way to shop. That's R a K u t e n rakuten.com Progressive knows we all crave validation.
- [63:24]
E
Girl, you are not 37.
- [63:25]
A
I would have guessed 27.
- [63:26]
B
You guys are too sweet.
- [63:28]
A
Sure dewy skin to recognize.
- [63:30]
E
Um, is something wrong Ned?
- [63:31]
G
Why would you ask?
- [63:32]
A
Just because Today marks my 10th anniversary without a car accident or even a speeding ticket. But somehow tonight's all about your skin care. Wow.
- [63:41]
F
With snapshot from Progressive you can get a personalized rate based on how you drive and that's all the validation you need. Progressive Casualty insurance company and affiliate snapshot not available in California from all agents. Surcharge possible for unsafe driving.
- [63:52]
B
Well, a new study in JAMA shows that young people are being over diagnosed with cancer. This is something doctors have warned about for elderly people. But war? Why is it happening to young people and why is that a problem? Well, according to the study, many of these so called cancers may not have been deadly yet they're still triggering aggressive Treatments, lifelong medications, heavy psychological and financial toll of being labeled a cancer patient. Critical care physician Dr. Paul Marik joins us today because he's been warning us about this for years. He says that chemotherapy is based on a false premise which would be predicated on something like this, an over diagnosis of cancer. So, Doctor, thank you for joining us. First of all, what do you make of this study and the fact that it's something you've been saying and is now in a mainstream journal?
- [64:47]
H
Yes. The effects are incorrect. So they're claiming that the increasing incidence of cancer is due to increasing diagnosis. That is false. So we are currently facing a pandemic or epidemic of cancer. The reality is 1 in 2 people, 1 in 2 people will develop cancer. That's what's on the cards. And for the others that don't develop cancer, they will have someone in their family or a friend develop cancer. So cancer is going to become the commonest cause of death. So they're trying to underplay the importance of this pandemic for multiple reasons. So if you actually look at the data from the American Cancer Society, so I have their data here, in the last 10 years, the incidence of cancer has increased by 17%. 17%. So what they claimed in this article is that the mortality was flat, so that it means that this is just an increase in diagnosis. But that's not true. So data from the American Cancer association shows that the risk of cancer in the last 10 years has gone up 17% and the mortality has increased by 5%. So this is real.
- [66:23]
B
Okay, so it's not over diagnosis, but is it?
- [66:28]
H
It's absolutely true. It's not due to over diagnosis. We are suffering. We are facing a pandemic of cancer.
- [66:38]
B
And so you, what you just indicated is that this was before the COVID 19 pandemic, that these.
- [66:45]
H
So that's an interesting question. Yes. So I have two papers which actually looked at the incidence of cancer in young people up until 2019, and both papers showed an increase in the risk of cancer in young people. So this is in jama, Open Network and in Lancet, showing that the incidence of cancer and the risk of dying of cancer in young people was increasing up until 2019. Obviously then something happened in 2020, 21, which has changed that trajectory. And so we now have many reports from oncologists, but we have four epidemiological studies showing that since the introduction of the vaccine, the risk of cancer has almost doubled.
- [67:46]
B
Okay.
- [67:47]
H
Since the introduction of the COVID MRNA vaccines, the risk of cancer has almost doubled.
- [67:55]
B
And so is there maybe some kind of politics at play? That's what I thought when I saw this. Is there a reason that they might want to downplay increase of cancer in young people by saying actually it's just over diagnosed?
- [68:12]
H
Yeah, they don't want to scare people. They don't want to look for other causes of cancer. Oncology is big business. Cancer is a multibillion dollar industry. And big pharma will do whatever they can to preserve the status quo. Although we know that oncological drugs have a minimal impact on preserving or prolonging life expectancy. It's one of the big medical hoaxes because it's based on a premise which is most likely false. The somatic mutation theory on which oncology is based is almost certainly scientifically flawed. So the whole, the whole game, much like the COVID game, was to preserve the status quo, not to frighten people away from conventional therapy and to embrace chemotherapy. But we have a really serious cancer problem in the US and across the world. As I said, the rates are increasing at phenomenal rates. It seems like the shots, the COVID shots, have accelerated that. There was a paper published three days ago, a massive study in Korea, a big epidemiological study in looking at millions of people showing that the risk of cancer one year after the vaccine almost doubled. So they don't want you to know this, they don't want you to be scared because obviously it's gonna promote vaccine hesitancy and the medical liability and litigation is enormous.
- [70:04]
B
Okay. That's why. So I brought this screenshot of the conflict of interests from the Arthurs. And if you're saying it's a false premise, it would make sense that their conflicts are Medicaid, Medicare, Johnson and Johnson. Right. So we can sort of make a connection on who benefits from this downplaying of the epidemic of cancer.
- [70:26]
H
Absolutely. All of these papers and studies are so profoundly conflicted with big pharma involved and the agencies. They don't want to scare Americans into one realizing the vaccine causes cancer. They don't want to scare Americans into the fact that the risk of cancer in young people is going up. And they don't want to scare Americans into the idea that traditional oncology is probably ineffective for most tumors, most cancers. So this is an agenda of big pharma industry, the medical complex, to maintain the status quo.
- [71:16]
B
Okay, so maybe we can look at the more positive side of your research, is that you say cancer prevention is a lot more effective than cancer treatment. And so that's where most people, because this is terrifying data. That's where most people need to put their efforts right now. So can you explain that?
- [71:34]
H
Yeah, absolutely. So maybe 40% of cancers we don't know exactly are preventable just by many lifestyle changes. And so you don't make money by selling lifestyle changes. And so that's why it's somewhat unappealing to mainstream medicine. Probably the most important is obesity and insulin resistance driving cancer. And so that is a major problem. You know, metabolic dysfunction and metabolic unhealthy drives cancer. There's no question of doubt. It also drives diabetes and Alzheimer's disease, as well as a host of other diseases. So the most important first intervention is metabolic control and treatment of insulin resistance. The second is vitamin D deficiency. Almost all patients who develop cancer are vitamin D deficient. The data is absolutely clear on this. And so there's really good data that supplementing with vitamin D, which costs pennies, so I have a year stock of vitamin D in a really good dose, cost me about $12. So there's very little financial incentive for the status quo to promote people to take vitamin D, because you're not going to make money out of vitamin D. Right.
- [73:04]
B
Okay, next.
- [73:05]
H
The next thing obviously is smoking. People got to stop smoking. Processed foods are highly associated with cancer, and so people got to stop eating processed foods. So now we're talking about, you know, not big pharma, but big food. 80% of Americans are addicted to processed foods and, you know, foods with high carbohydrate index. So you can see it runs very deep. And basically it comes down to lifestyle changes, which are really fundamental in general overall health. But you can't. You can't make money by advising patients or promoting, you know, a healthy lifestyle.
- [73:56]
B
Sure. So if you were talking to a young person and they were just in this sort of seek mode for cancer, what would you tell people? Given that you're saying over diagnosis is actually not a problem, what do you make of that? Like, do you need to be screened for all types of cancers at all times?
- [74:18]
H
So I think people need to recognize that cancer is a big risk, that they need to adopt lifestyle changes to reduce their risk. There are also nutraceuticals. And we've come up with a protocol or the roots protocol, and it's supported by published scientific data. They're just taking a few supplements. And the one which was published in plos was a combination of vitamin D, omega 3, and exercise. So those three interventions reduce the risk of cancer by 60%. So what people should be doing is, you know, taking, you Know, we have a terrible diet, American diet is toxic, and we need to, you know, rethink about how we eat. And then the possibility of taking two or three supplements, which has good scientific evidence to reduce the risk of cancer. And then those who are at a higher risk. So those who have a family history of cancer, maybe have a genetic defect, have a previous cancer, should really go on a more aggressive protocol of nutraceuticals and repurposed drugs to reduce the risk of cancer. So this is something people should really take seriously because the incidence is increasing and more people are dying of cancer. And obviously it's an awful diagnosis. So you want to do whatever you can to reduce your risk of getting cancer.
- [75:57]
B
Fantastic. Thank you so much. This was really enlightening because it just is a strange paper to sort of come across jama. And I was really glad to get someone to break it down for me. So my guest has been Dr. Paul Merrick, and you can follow him on X. And he's on. He's. He's been warning about this for a long time. Thank you so much for your time.
- [76:17]
H
Yeah. And just the bottom line is you can't trust what the major medical journals publish. We've learned that they are controlled. The major medical journals are controlled by big pharma in the industry. And you already kind of trust. You can't trust what they publish. So one has to be very skeptical.
- [76:35]
B
I get their emails, you know, just daily. And it's. It's always full of all kinds of crap, like, people are doing terrible on Ozempic, how do we help them? Kind of stuff. Like, they know nobody can tolerate it, but how do we keep prescribing it? How do we prescribe the COVID vaccine even though it's not indicated?
- [76:52]
H
Why don't they just tell people to eat less? You know, that's a much more way. And not to eat all the time. You know, we strongly believe in intermittent fasting as a profound way of improving metabolic health. But instead, they sell you a zempic which costs 2 or $3,000.
- [77:13]
B
Yes. It's wild, right? Okay, well, it was a pleasure to talk to you. I hope you'll come back on Redacted another time.
- [77:21]
H
Yeah, thanks for inviting me.
- [77:24]
B
All right, well, don't be scared, you guys. Again, you can take some vitamin D, you can get exercise, you can do things. So please take control of your health. Do that. That's gonna be. That's gonna do it for us on Redacted. Coming up later in the week, I'm gonna have an interview with Dr. Ellie Phillips. Has any of you heard of her work? She talks about how dentists don't know what the f. They're talking about and just wanna drill into your teeth, give you all kinds of cavities, put you in this blame game. Blame game. But there are actually easy things you can do to keep the dentist away. I just finished her book called Kiss yous Dentist Goodbye. Fascinating. I can't wait for you to hear her research. And I'm super looking forward to meeting her. She's gonna come into the studio in person. So along those lines of just doctors who get it wrong or who just, you know, try to continue to medicalize your body to the detriment of society. So that's our shtick here, is seeking out the truth. Seeking out more information that's kept from us. Thank you so much for joining us. Uh, you can find more about whatever topics we're gonna cover in the redacted newsletter. We publish the redacted newsletter every day that this show is live, Monday through Thursday. And I try really hard to make sure that you have original source material. So, for instance, if there's a lawsuit, I don't link you to a mainstream media news story about the lawsuit. I try and find you the lawsuit so that you can study it for yourself. It doesn't help you to link you to a story about it. So I. I work really hard on it. This is something we do every day. It's like a companion to this show. And it's totally free. If you go to redacted.inc. there's no upsell or cross sell. Everything there is free for you to subscribe to. And then when I link you to something that may be behind a paywall, I try and find you a free link. So it's a passion project here at Redacted. So please do subscribe. Subscribe and ask your friends to subscribe. I think you'll really like it. Put a little joke in there today about Les Miserables. Philip loves Les Miserables. Did you catch my joke, Philip?
- [79:28]
C
I haven't read it yet.
- [79:30]
B
Okay, that's all right. I didn't mean to quiz you on the spot. So the joke was. I'll just leave. I'm gonna leave you with this. That Nicole Kidman and what's her husband's name, Keith Urban, are getting divorced after 19 years. And every time I hear 19 years, I think of Les Miserables because that was the Prince prison sentence of Jean Valjean. So the little joke was, would you rather be in a French labor camp prison for 19 years or married to Nicole Kidman. What do you think? Anybody? Any takers?
- [80:01]
A
I mean, I would. I would have got it for sure. So.
- [80:03]
B
Yeah. So anyway, I just.
- [80:06]
A
I read the newsletter after.
- [80:08]
B
Discuss that amongst yourselves whether you'd rather be Jean Valjean or Keith Urban. Okay, that was a fun little aside. Sometimes I try and add little fun asides in the newsletter because it's not all doom and gloom. We have to live our lives together. Okay, I will see you here tomorrow, everybody. Same time, same place. Please make sure if you're watching the show, if you can interact with it in any way, you help our algorithm. So put something, you know in the comment box. Put a, like, put a subscribe share with a friend. That always really helps us because the algorithm is not our friend. So please do that. We're your friend. We'll see you here tomorrow, friends.