B (2:37)

But first, but first we want to tell you about the bearskin hoodie, because maybe you've heard about this. Smart people are grabbing theirs now when it's freezing, you want the gear that actually keeps you warm. Bearskin is running a 60% off deal right now. So you finally upgrade that sad excuse for a winter hoodie you've been suffering in. Now, let me tell you specifically why I like this is because I have teenagers who refuse to go to school in a coat. I guess it's uncool to wear a coat, but they will wear a hoodie. And I get it because they go, you know, from the car to the, in building in the winter and then they don't leave again, they don't want to carry a coat. It's uncool. This is a really good midway solution specifically for that. Now if you're not a teenager that goes to high school and you're like, I actually will wear a coat, you want to look into bearskin. They have a buffet of really great options for heavy winter weather. And the hoodies are really built for serious cold weather. They've got 340 gsms of bare skin fleece, 10 legit pockets, a muscular fit, and even zips into the heavy storm rain jacket to turn into a full winter waterproof armor. So whether you're hiking, hunting, traveling, or just really hate being cold, this is the last hoodie you need. And Clayton and I wear ours every morning because we walk the dog in all weather. Because he's got to go out, we got to do it. And we also, we want him to get exercise and live longer. So our dog does get full walks every day in winter gear. There's no dog. There's no dog version of bearskin as far as I know. Right? We can put that on our wish list. It's just the humans that wear the bear skin. So check them out. Text redacted to 36912 or go to bear skin. Redacted. That's B A E R skin/redacted for 60 off your hoodie today. Again, that's B A E R Skin slash redacted.

C (4:27)

All right, just making sure we're up on Rumble here. I don't see us on Rumble at all. What is going on with them? I need to check in on these guys. We're not showing up on their homepage anywhere. What's happening? Anybody watching us on Rumble right now?

E (4:42)

Grim just said a bit ago, Grim said that rumble and YouTube audio is good, so he's able to see it. I can't see it from where I'm at because I'm doing other things.

C (4:49)

So, yeah, normally we have right there on the front page. So not sure what's going on, but hopefully we can reach out to their team and find out why that's happening. Okay, well, we are gearing up for another false flag attack designed to provoke Iran into a full blown war. According to sources, Redacted has spoken to key US And Israeli military hardware is almost in place for this new attack. We've also learned that Russia has massive countermeasures in place and ready for this attack. And we've also learned that the United States is not calling the shots here. Big surprise. Who do you think is calling the shots? Who runs everything? Of course it's Israel. It's Israel and the Deep State war clan in the United States with the coordination of the CIA that are driving this entire move, of course. Meanwhile, US Carrier strike group now in place ready for this attack. And according to the New York Times, which you could line your birdcage with, President Trump has received multiple US Intelligence reports indicating that Iranian government's position is weakening. So the CIA is telling him the truth or are they lying to him? Where is this information coming from, Mossad that Iran is now at the weakest point since 1979. That is the intelligence report. And then it's leaked to the New York Times. Okay, so you might as well attack right now because they're at their weakest point since 1979, says Mossad and the CIA via the New York Times to President Trump. Okay. Colonel Daniel Davis is the host of the Deep Dive with Daniel Davis and he joins us now. Colonel, sorry for my cynicism that I've seen this script. I've seen this script before. I'm not falling for it. What say you?

D (6:31)

Yeah, I'm right with you. I was just nodding up and down before you brought me in here. Just listening to that because, yeah, I don't see any. I'll just preface this by saying I don't have any secret information into the inside of the Iranian regime, but I have certainly been following most of my adult career. And I don't see any evidence that it's weakening. To the, to the contrary, I see that they used a pretty iron hand to put down a rebellion which was, we know openly was foisted from the outside from the Syrian Democratic Forces in some regards, from Mossad, according to Mike Pompeo, who tweeted it out on New Year's Eve.

C (7:08)

And Mossad. And Mossad. Mossad themselves tweeted it out.

D (7:13)

Okay, okay, well, I missed that one. But you see that when I hear of people like Jack Keane on US Television, John Bolton, and they talk about how these poor demonstrators and these poor people, we have to go help them. And I'm thinking, what are you talking about? We're the ones who have the economic sanctions on the regime to harm them, to make them uprise and then stir them up. And now you want to say that that's why you're going to turn them, to help them. I mean, obviously, that's when we, I think we get into what you were talking about at the top here is that this sounds like a false flag situation. Maybe the false flag is not the right word, but it sounds like you're trying to dupe the American people in believing we have to go do something to help those poor people, that we are the ones that put in that position. And then to claim, well, they're at their weakest point. That's what you want to be true. And I think that is the intent. That's what they wanted it to be, the truth. So these, these protests could rise up. With all the Starlinks you saw, 40,000 were discovered. Who knows how many weren't. All kinds of fingerprints all over this. But I don't think it worked. I think that they got back control of it. I think a lot of Iranian people paid the price because they listened to us, because they tried to do it. They were put down. And now I think that there's a lot of firmness inside Iran. For example, if you didn't see anybody from the IRGC turn and join the protesters or anybody from the government abandoned the place, you know, you don't see any of the military joining the pro. If that was the case, then you could say they're weak. I haven't seen any of that. If it happened, I didn't see it.

C (8:43)

But.

D (8:44)

But I think if President Trump is led to believe that they're at this weakest point and he'll go in and just push a little bit harder and his house of cards will come down I think he's going to get a very powerful repudiation of that in all of our faces if he tries.

B (8:58)

Now, President Trump has said they call all the time, they want to make a deal. We think we can make a deal. I try not to read too much into what he says and instead go by what he does. But what is he even talking about a deal? Because according to US Government, Iran has never been proven to have a nuclear weapon, but we destroyed the one that they never were proven to have. And so, I mean the recent military documents saying they're just still open to it. So the deal is about their attitudes. What the hell? What, what is this deal that he talks of?

D (9:34)

I'll tell you, Natalie, it's more fantasy. The Axios had a piece, I think it was, or maybe it was last night. I think there was an interview with the president yesterday and it says that this, he says we're closer to a deal now. And if they'll just make a deal, I think that we won't have to use this power. And then you look at what it says the deal was. U.S. officials say any deal would have to include the removal of all enriched uranium from Iran, a cap on Iran's stockpile of long range missiles, a change in Iran's policy of supporting proxies in the region, and a ban on independent enrichment of uranium otherwise, or in other words, all of the red lines that Iran said they would never do. So if you're saying that we'll have a negotiated settlement as long as they agree to these terms that they won't agree to, then you're guaranteeing that there's going to be a military strike here. That's how I see it.

C (10:24)

Let's talk about the military side of this, Colonel. Your specialty, of course. So you're seeing these reports about the US Strike group already in the region, reports that we learned here at redacted through our own sources that there's been a massive buildup of equipment. It's almost complete. It's not fully complete yet. And then of course we, as we reported on the Russian side, they have a, you know, pretty sophisticated response package in place. There's also separate reports, not of our reporting, but China with big shipments of military equipment coming into, into Iran as well. How do you think that this all comes to pass over the next maybe few days if, if the reports out of Israel are to be believed? From IDF reports that we're hearing, January 30th is like a target date for this to happen.

D (11:14)

I had not heard that date. I just cannot tell you how much I'll push against that, every episode that I get on my own show to do that. But I think that when you look at what happened in June of last year, I think there are too many people in the Trump administration, maybe primarily with the Trump himself, who thinks that he did something that was easy back then and it worked, and now I can do that again and it'll work again. But the problem is that evidence suggests, and I've had at least one source who claims to have some insider information that says a lot of that was negotiated between the United States and Iran before the strike, that all right, we're going to come in, we're going to hit this place here, we're going to hit it with this kind of ordinance. We're going to say it was totally destroyed. You're going to say, oh, we're upset, and you're going to fire back at Al ud, but you're going to only fire at these targets here at this particular time. And then it's going to be done and everybody walks away a winner. Whether that happened or not, I can't say. But there's evidence to suggest that it did because everybody seemed really eager to get over with this 12 day war. If we go in now, from other sources I have in the region right now are saying that many of the Shia are saying this is the existential fight here. We're tired of just kicking this can down the road because every time we agree to you with something, you agree to it or come back with violence later on. And if we agree to something now, it'll just be a temporary thing until you come back again. We want to push for it now. If you attack this time, we are not going to hold our punches and we are going to kill Americans in the region and we're going to kill Israelis and we're going to hit targets they don't want us to hit, but they can't stop us from hitting. That is the nightmare scenario and why I am so adamant that the administration needs to not do this. Because there is, understand this, there is zero potential upside for a strike on Iran. No gain whatsoever, but potentially catastrophic on the downside if things go sideways. Because if Iran does what it says it will do, and I don't know that they will, but if they do, in that real potential could cause a lot of American deaths that otherwise will never happen. And we should never sacrifice American lives because of a policy choice to take a war that we don't need to take for our national security. That would be the hot of just, I can't even think of the right word, just impudence and just wrong headedness to sacrifice an American troop because you want a policy choice that you don't need.

C (13:48)

Can I follow up on that? And we heard rumblings obviously a few weeks ago, that the reason this was called off is because Israel wasn't ready or prepared for it yet. Incoming hypersonic missiles, et cetera. There are other reports, I think Matt Gaetz separately reporting on this, that the President of the United States actually was pretty measured in his response and was not convinced that there was a goal to be met. So, sort of conflicting stories there. Like, what is the goal? Is it regime change? Like, what exactly is the goal?

D (14:24)

I would rather believe the first report that Israel said that we're not ready yet and we need more. Because if President Trump, at the very 11th hour before a strike, suddenly discovers that, well, what's the objective? Well, then he never had one. Because you cannot get to that point unless you already know and have agreed to what the objective is with your military. That's why you're sending in the combat power. I can promise you we're not sending in all aircraft carrier, battle group and all the other air power that's been flown in and got near there just in case something happened. We have an intentional reason. And if you listen to Jack Keane and John Bolton, it's absolute outright regime change and nothing but that. And we know that Lindsey Graham, of course, has been absolutely beside himself in adamant, passionate proclamations to try and get regime change. So we know that some of the closest allies to President Trump want that. We certainly know that that's the in Israel. So I don't see any other attainable military objective short of attempting a regime change with all of this combat power. But I don't see that being a militarily attainable mission at all. So I don't see any attainable military operation other than we could blow up a lot of stuff. We could shoot a bunch of missiles, we can kill a bunch of people. But at the end of the day, if you're not going to even have the threat to go in with several hundred thousand boots on the ground to conquer a country, all you can do is blow up a bunch of stuff and then you have a situation like the Houthis, where all they have to do is not lose and stay viable, and then they can be a thorn in your side forever because they're not going to come after us, but they can hit us in the region. And I'm telling you, the nightmare scenario is that one of our ships gets taken out because of an anti ship missile that Iran has. And they have quite a few of them and we minimize those to our peril.

B (16:20)

I do have another question. Why do you think, when you study all the ways that Barack Obama tortured the region on behalf of Israeli interest, why he brought war to Syria, why he surged in Iraq, all of these reasons, but it was at least like death by a thousand cuts. It was awful and bloody and horrible, but it was more subtle. Why do you think that Israel would push Trump to do the full shebang? You know what I mean?

D (16:46)

Because Trump will. Because Obama wouldn't. Because Obama was worried about optics and he was worried about his domestic agenda. And he was still operating on something close to what used to be the normal rules. And so he didn't want to get too far out of those. Trump has no rules. There has no laws. He has no constraints from the Constitution, the law, anything. That's not hyperbole. And so they see that and they wanted to take advantage of it because they know he'll do stuff that nobody else would. And of course, they feed his ego in that and tell him what a great president he is. And how many times have you seen Benjamin Netanyahu just lather over Trump in ways that makes me sick, but it works and that's how people succeed, to get him to do stuff. And of course, with all the money that's flowing in American politics, that's just fuel for that fire. So I think that's the reason why.

C (17:32)

I guess, finally, Colonel, the Russian and Chinese response to this. So they're there massive amounts of weapon equipment, support, logistics, et cetera. Then you also have this new axis which is really a counterbalance in the Middle east to Israel. What sort of a response do you think we'd see from Russia, China and this new sort of Saudi Arabian axis trying to put a buffer between Israel and Iran?

D (17:57)

Yeah, you know, I think that China and Russia will both do things in logistic help and some supplies in the background. Probably not unlike what China does to help Russia Russia in the war against Ukraine. It's not any direct military support, but it's like dual use kind of things that they need to have to make other things. Because I think that China and Russia are both perfectly content to just sit back and watch us eat ourselves and watch us just impale ourselves in a war here that will only drag us further down and will drive a further wedge between us and other of our own allies, much less others around the world and is making brics look better and better. I mean, you can see that with some of the fallout from our absurd obsession over Greenland and all the things that we were nearly willing to do with our own allies and taking something by force, even though we had an agreement where we could have just expanded our military base with no problem at all. But Trump wanted it. So now there's all these issues that have gone along with that. And we see when Trump continues to say all these harsh words against and put tariffs every time somebody does something he doesn't like against friends. And now that you see Mark Carney just signed a big trade deal with China, you see the European Union today brag about their big trade deal with India, brics, two BRICS companies. So we're, I think China and Russia are going, hey, we're not going to get in the way of our enemy and, you know, give them any excuse to do anything to us. We'll let you impale yourselves and we'll just pick up the rewards and the windfalls outside of this by looking like the more responsible state. That's what I really think that they're going to end up doing.

E (19:36)

Can I kind of chime in, sorry, real quick, just on this kind of point, because it comes up so seldom and that's just that like, so Israel has, has a pretty long standing we will nuke you if we start to lose kind of attitude. And they've publicly said that. And so getting involved with Iran, I think the, the state that gets left out the most is Pakistan, who has flat out said we will nuke Israel if Israel nukes anybody else. And so there's this kind of like standing chain reaction of because like Russia and China I doubt would retaliate against a nuke because they understand the broader picture. But Pakistan I think would. And I mean, if you want to see like that nuclear Armageddon chain reaction, I think it starts with that of Iran attacking Israel to the point that Israel feels threatened. Israel then nukes Iran and then out of nowhere Pakistan nukes Israel and then all hell breaks loose everywhere.

D (20:26)

Yeah, yeah, all hell would have broken loose already by that point. I tell you. I do worry about the first part of that, about Israel losing because if they calculate it, I think that they may have that one of the reasons they may have paused on the 14th of January is because they wanted more combat power in a more buy in from the Trump administration so that the two could go all in. Because I think Israel has rightly calculated that if there is an attack on Iran, they, they recognize they're going to touch some missiles in the teeth. They know they can't stop them, but they think if they had the US together that they could take out the conventional threat before the pain gets too great and then the result will be the same. But if they have miscalculated and we don't have the power that they think we do, and I'll tell you, we don't have the sustainment capability, if this turned into a long war and dragged out, we don't have enough missiles to be able to fire and sustain a long term engagement. Iran may have enough to cause really big damage into Israel and they could get to a point to where they could say, okay, all the fun and games is over. That's why we have a nuclear threshold and we're going to use it. They could do that. I know what Pakistan has said, but I rather doubt that they would be doing it because I think that India would not want them to do it, China would not want them to do it. Nobody would want them to do it because of the chain reaction potential. And I also don't think that when it push comes to shove that they're not going to want to catch an Israeli missile in their teeth with the nuclear capable because Israel certainly isn't going to use all their, their weapons on the, on the one strike on, against Iran. So I don't think they would do it. But let's don't find out because the, the, if I'm wrong, like you said, it's all hell has broken loose on Earth.

C (22:09)

Yeah. If you're wrong, we're not going to be here to, to call you on it, Colonel. There'll be nothing left.

B (22:14)

All right, Again, it's based on nonsense. They're saying Iran has specifically said we're not gonna strike you this, we're not gonna do this. They never have. They never have.

D (22:26)

And now there's no question about that.

B (22:29)

The Trump administration is saying we have to do it to preempt them doing it to Israel. That's, it's nonsensical and in fact the leader of CENTCOM is there saying we're preparing for the preemptive strike that would prevent what they've never done. It's, this is such bullshit.

D (22:48)

I couldn't say it better.

B (22:49)

Yeah. Okay, well, we give that a big B.S. redacted B.S. thank you, Colonel, it's always good to see you. Thanks for having me. Make sure you're following his YouTube channel. It is fantastic. Always Breaking down the military lies one at a time. It's busy work, and I hope you.

C (23:05)

Know, again, according to sources in Israel, this seems to be all eyes on January 30th into the end of the month. So Friday into Saturday, like it was carried out last time.

B (23:14)

That doesn't work for me, guys. I'm busy that day. I have to take a kid somewhere. So let's don't do it, all right?

C (23:20)

Yeah. It's all so Netanyahu. It's all about her. Make sure you don't do it, okay?

B (23:25)

I'm not available to report that day, so please don't.

C (23:28)

Please don't do it.

B (23:29)

Okay, Coming up, we're gonna talk about whether or not this big winter storm had any geoengineering to do with it. What do you think? Also, we're gonna talk about the CIA infiltrating Venezuela, but on the open at least this time. Before we do that, we wanna tell you about our friends over at Ethos. Now, like most people, I think most people think, oh, no, when they have a family, do I have life insurance? What would happen to my family if something were to happen to me or if something were to happen to my husband? It's a reasonable thing to think. Well, Ethos is a great place to get started. In fact, if you go to ethos.com redacted, you can get up to $3 million in coverage in as little as 10 minutes. And in fact, they don't make you take a medical exam if you don't want to. You can get a quote unquote in seconds, apply in minutes, and then have same day coverage. No medical exam. You just answer a few simple health questions, and again, up to $3 million in coverage. How much would that give you? Peace of mind. Some policies are as low as $30 a month. As of March of last year, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no medical exam, instant life insurance provider. And they have a 4.8 out of 5 stars on Trustpilot with over 33,000 reviews. So again, you know, you think about all the responsibility you carry as the working person in your family. If something happens to you, there are real consequences, like mortgage payments and tuitions and everyday bills. They don't just disappear. And you want to make sure that the p that those responsibilities will be taken care of. So check them out. That's why we recommend Ethos. Again, protect your family with life insurance from Ethos right now and get a free quote in as little as 10 minutes. Go to ethos.com/redacted the longer you wait, you know, the more expensive your policies will be. You'll be sorry that you waited. So don't wait. Ethos.com/redacted well, right now about 1 million.

C (25:24)

Americans are still without power, if you can believe that. After that brutal winter storm brought massive snow and ice to much of the United States. Was the government or NGOs involved in some sort of a massive cloud seeding, chemical geoengineering operation prior to this weekend storm? Well, look at eyewitness reports all over the country. It doesn't take far to. It doesn't take much to actually find them reporting the same thing. All reporting the same thing. In the morning, the skies had a few of these lines in the sky, mostly clear, but then a few started to appear. Then by 10am more and more started to appear all across the skies. Then by 1pm More and more, look at that. More and more start appearing above the skies. And then 3pm you know, again, more of these lines in the skies. And then of course we saw what happened. A massive, really devastating storm. We still don't know the effects or the how much of this, the fallout we'd have, the power outages, what will be the total death count? What is the operation here? Dane Wigginton is the leader over@geoengineeringwatch.org and he has been looking at this storm and all of the pieces of this that have gone into making this storm happen over the past few days. And one of our favorite guests to have back here on the show, Dane, welcome back to the show. Great to see you.

F (26:50)

Thanks, Clayton. Thanks, Natalie. And first to answer the question, is this storm engineered? Yes, absolutely, 100%, top to bottom. I'll get to that. But if I can back up that formerly incredibly important conversation you just had with Colonel Davis and Natalie, I could not agree with you more on your assessment, your anger at the situation in Iran. Whatever we think of their culture or their government, they have not invaded another country for 250 years. And so again, the amount of deception going on is mind numbing. And let me weave that into climate engineering. We know Iran has been the victim of climate engineering, weather warfare for at least four decades. They have completely cut off the flow of precipitation to Iran, so much so that the capital of Iran, with a population of 10 million is now, they're now considering evacuating 10 million people to where because they literally have no water, because the NATO operations and Iran has specifically named NATO and Israel as cutting off their precipitation for 40 years. That's weather Warfare. I wonder why they don't like us over there. And again, they've been on the floor of the UN on film on the record, stating and emphatically the president of that country, that NATO's cutting off their precipitation. How is that not an ongoing act of war for 40 years?

B (28:07)

I didn't know that.

C (28:08)

Right. Actually, can you talk more about that, Dean?

F (28:11)

Absolutely. On the floor of the un, Ahmadinejad from Iran going back a decade plus emphatically stating that NATO and Israel were cutting off the flow of precipitation to Iran. And let's plug this in. Going all the way back 64 years to President Lyndon Johnson in 1962. This is the beginning 30 seconds of every weekly geoengineeringwatch.org update on our site. All news. First 30 seconds is film footage. Lyndon Johnson stating on film, on the record that we had the power to control the world's cloud layer then. And he who controls the weather controls the world. Why? Because he who controls the weather can control the flow of precipitation to any country anywhere. How toxic that rain is, how much rain falls or doesn't. Thus they can destabilize food supplies. Thus they can destabilize populations. 40 years. The Iranian climate science meteorological community has stated that NATO is cutting off their precipitation. They're not guessing. They have incredibly sophisticated weather monitoring facilities just like we have. There's no speculation here. They're cutting off precipitation.

C (29:18)

What are the mechanics of that?

B (29:19)

Dan, just before question, how does that work?

C (29:21)

Before we get to the US piece of this in the storm, I want to continue on this line of thought. But what are the mechanics of us just cutting it off? I know what Lyndon Johnson said, of course, in Vietnam and how we used cloud seeding to actually flood, flood the troops. But how do we cut it off?

F (29:38)

Climate intervention, AKA weather warfare operations are far more effective than at eliminating and dispersing precipitation, than augmenting it. They've done the same thing to the US west coast going back over a decade. My presentations engineered drought catastrophe target California. We can speculate on the agendas and objectives and there are many, all of them nefarious. They're doing the same thing here, but the mechanisms by which they can completely cut off precipitation by the manipulation of atmospheric pressure zones, high pressure domes, which are exactly what ionosphere heater facilities like HAARP create. HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. It's one of about 100 ionosphere heaters around the globe. These facilities, and this is not speculation either, this is science study confirmed fact. They in the case of HAARP can transmit 3.6 million watts of power to the ionosphere. Electrically charged ionosphere. That's a frequency transmission that causes an electrical chain reaction, superheats that part of the atmosphere, expanding it up and down. The downward push forms a high pressure dome. Nothing can enter that, no moisture can enter that. It spins around it in the northern hemisphere, that creates a clockwise spin. So what we have happening right now, I'll weave all this together. The high pressure dome in the west is spinning all the moisture clockwise up and over the western US they're chemically nucleating it the whole way. Spins it back down into the eastern U.S. they combine that with the flow of moisture from the record warm Gulf of Mexico. Since when do winter storms come from the record warm Gulf of Mexico? And they combine those two and in the transition zone you have now, thundersnow, you have ice storms everywhere because this chemically nucleated material hits the ground before it sets up. These are patented processes, by the way. So back to Natalie's question. How do they cut off precipitation? That high pressure dome, when you're manipulating atmospheric pressure zones, you can cut off moisture from ever even entering a part of the world. Second method, if they overseed with condensation nuclei, that's too small, particles that are too small to allow the raindrops to combine and form. What you get is these featureless skies that looks like it should rain, but nothing falls out. Again, those are two methods with which they can completely cut off precipitation to an area for as long as they want. These are patented processes. They've done it to Iran for decades, they're doing it to the US So you end up with these drought deluge scenarios. And the crown jewel weapon for the controllers, Natalie and Clayton, is that they can blame all of this on nature, right?

C (32:24)

Absolutely. And we, by the way, when you talk about haarp, I mean we've spoken to whistleblowers who are, who've worked on these HARP arrays. I've spoken to multiple whistleblowers from that have worked on these HARP arrays and confirmed everything that you just talked about. And not only one of the, you know, that I talked about was up in Alaska. One of the HARP centers in Alaska which we.

F (32:42)

That's the one that's actually called haarp. H A A R P is the acronym and that's the one people most recognize. It's the, the biggest facility like it in the world. But there's about a hundred similar facilities, different designs. And we also have the NEXRAD network That's a frequency transmission network in the continental US that's used to manipulate storms like the Texas flood last July that held that storm in place, caused it to precipitate out in one location, Hurricane Harvey. That's how they know Hurricane Harvey was going to go where it went seven days in advance. And they knew seven days in advance it was going to sit there and spin and drop 50 inches of rain. Because those frequency transmissions, which are of a different variety than the ionis for heaters, they have the ability, by a repelling effect on the air mass that's saturated with electrically conductive particulates to hold that air mass in place if they surround it with these transmissions. So, again, from every conceivable level, these storms are being manipulated. And what's happening right now in the continental U.S. and although there are many agendas and objectives with the chemical winter weather warfare which is taking place, that's exactly what it is. Don't eat the snow. I don't say that in jest, but what do we see from Mr. Trump about this weather? He said, quote, where's your global warming now? So we know the agenda is to drill, baby, drill and burn, baby, burn, and take over countries that have oil like Venezuela. So they need cover for that. They need the American population to think that's not a problem. Great. The more the better. And Trump just tweeted, again, where's your global warming now? Because the eastern half of the US lower 48, is being chemically cooled combined with robbing cold air from the Arctic. And Clayton and Natalie, what don't they tell us in places like Alaska, where they just had seven feet of snow in Juneau, Alaska, recently, so much snow, chemically nucleated snow that came from a moisture flow from Hawaii. Seven feet of snow. So much it was sinking boats in the Juneau harbor, literally. You can see pictures of this online, followed by rain, rain in Alaska while it's snowing on the Gulf coast in Florida. What does it take to wake people up? That the whole system is blowing apart? And climate engineering is this biggest single factor tearing it apart. I'm not saying there's not other sources of damage to the planet. We've been really bad stewards of the planet. And I'm trying to. We try@geoengineeringwatch.org to unite both sides of this fence. We have the left that recognizes all the other sources of damage, that refuses to acknowledge climate engineering, and that's very perplexing. And we have the other side of the fence that acknowledges climate Engineering, but refuses to acknowledge the other sources of damage. We need to build bridges, not burn them. And this mantra which we try to instill@geoenginewatch.org, i use this with legislators that I'm working with all over. Over the country. How can we have any legitimate discussion about climate, anything from any perspective, without first and foremost addressing the climate engineering elephant in the equation.

B (35:41)

I mean, as you're saying this about NATO, NATO and allies robbing Iran of water. And you think back to last year, Netanyahu holding these clean glasses of water as a taunt to Iranians saying, overthrow your cities, your government, and you will have this. Does this not hearken to the Hunger Games? President Snow eating steak in front of these starving people as a result of his own. I can't. That's diabolical to think of.

C (36:11)

Get rid of your regime and you can have this water. We'll simply flip it back on for you.

B (36:15)

I can't believe we're watching this. I cannot believe we've seen it. I mean, to me, that seems further proof that NATO and allies know it.

C (36:24)

I mean, they're using it. Yeah.

F (36:27)

Thank you for being so observant, Natalie. I saw that when it happened. That is exactly what that was about. That is. That is exactly the message he was sending with that little display of his. And again, this is when people wave their flags, pretending to be patriots here and going along with anything that the powers that shouldn't be do. They should get a clue about what's going on around the world and why so many people have, in so many countries have so much disdain for what we've done there. Whose military base is in everybody's backyard or on their border, and who's doing the most bombing of who where. I mean, again, Iran has not invaded another country for about 250 years. Who's the aggressor in this equation?

C (37:16)

When you look at the fallout from this storm in the United States and you saw. I mean, you could, if you were online, you saw so many people sharing the same images like we just showed you, of these chemicals in the sky. And as the days progressed, but right before the storm, they were getting more and more prominent and all of these aircraft going back and forth across the skies. I had reports coming in like crazy. I'm sure you did. Way more than anybody else, I guess. How do you piece this all together? Because it was widespread. I mean, it was all the way, you know, from the east coast all the way into the middle of the country. Who's powerful enough to carry this out running through NGOs, the United States government in collaboration with them through these NGOs. Let me just play this real quick. Here's President Trump acknowledging these types of being sprayed in the skies, talking to RFK Jr. Hoping he'll get to the bottom of it. Watch.

D (38:09)

So there's something wrong, there's something wrong.

F (38:13)

We've done something wrong.

D (38:14)

There's something.

C (38:14)

You're going to figure it out.

D (38:16)

Maybe it's a spray that we spray all over the place that nobody else does. Other countries.

C (38:21)

Yeah. Dane, yeah.

F (38:24)

That was a long time ago and he hasn't said anything since. Neither has RFK Lee Zeldin doing everything he can to cover up these operations and double down on denial with his official transparent contrail site. Just simply regurgitating the official denial of all this and all that spraying. In those images that you showed Clayton before this storm was really completely launched. The amount of toxic aerosol dispersing going on above the cloud canopy once you can't see anything up there is mind numbing. It's off the scale. It's way worse than what you see before the storm comes in. Way worse. In my location in the wilderness of Northern California, near the Oregon border, in the forest on top of a mountain, it's the middle of winter. We have not had a freezing temperature here yet. It has not frozen here yet in the Arctic Circle right now there's areas that are far above freezing. It's warmer in Greenland than parts of the US right now. And nobody talks about that. So again, what we've seen from this administration is the most aggressive doubling down on denial and cover up yet. And again, I'm not. This is not political. It's not left right issue in any way, shape or form. Those who print the money from behind the curtain are the ones pulling the strings. This is certainly DoD involved completely. We know private defense contractors Raytheon, Lockheed Martin are neck deep in this because Raytheon and Lockheed Martin do all the weather modeling for the nation's weathermen. Why would we need private defense contractors to do the modeling for the nation's weathermen that oh by the way have illegal federal gag orders on them? What will it take? My question is what will it take to wake the American population up to get them past their program denial and understand that they are the victims of constant chemical weather warfare right now more than ever? And that material that falls again is toxic. Every drop of rain is toxic. We have peer reviewed study to prove that. And Clayton and Natalie, if you're ever around any of this chemically nuclear material. Put your hands in it and see how long you can keep them there. It's far colder to the touch than any naturally nucleated snow. It behaves very differently. It tends to sublimate. So we don't get the runoff we should have in the Colorado river drainage basin, by the way. So whatever snowpack is there, and by the way, it's record low levels. How many people know that?

C (40:40)

Well, yeah, we're in Colorado and it's unbelievable. People, I mean, you know, people who've lived here their entire lives. I mean, this is the least amount of snowpack, the least amount of snow that they've seen in their lifetimes in Colorado.

F (40:54)

Right. See, Americans don't realize this because this is part of the psychological operation of. All they show on media is cold, cold, cold, snow, snow, snow. They'll show Erie, Pennsylvania, Buffalo, New York, where they pile up snow in what amounts to an atmospheric snow blowing machine. With atmospheric pressure zone manipulation, they can manipulate surface wind flows, zonal wind flows, so they create wind blowing ferociously across the Great Lakes, the record warm Great Lakes. They chemically nucleate that and pile up mountains of snow in a few isolated locations. And that's all they show on media. They don't show the snow drought in the Rockies, in Colorado. And that snow that's there, again, because it's chemically nucleated, it tends to sublimate, which means much of that moisture goes straight from a solid to a liquid like dry ice, which is the extreme form of a chemically nucleated form of ice. So you don't get nearly the runoff of even the little bit of snow that is there. So how is this not total winter weather warfare or weather warfare period, waged on US Populations that need to wake up and realize that those in power don't care any more about them than they do anybody anywhere else in the world. In fact, I would argue the US population is rapidly becoming a greater and greater liability to those in power. And that's an ominous scenario.

B (42:07)

Can you. I want to know more about this. I see it here. 2012 claims by Ahmadinejad that their clouds are being manipulated. So if you could send me that off the chain and let's do another segment about that.

C (42:23)

Yeah, for sure.

F (42:25)

And that's the tip of the iceberg. We've had this being conducted against countries around the world for decades and behind closed doors. This is the hammer with which the power structure has threatened those governments to allow U.S. occupations or they will cut their rain off indefinitely. And this is again, the crown jewel weapon of the military industrial complex and has been for many, many decades. Americans need to wake up to what's going on in our skies. And thanks so much to you, Clayton and Natalie for your consistent, credible coverage of this most dire issue.

B (42:55)

I'm mad as snakes.

C (42:56)

Yeah. Thank you, Dane. Just before we let you go, Miss Old School in our chat room says, I saw red and blue things moving in the rain and snow when I took samples and put it under a 300x microscope. And have you heard of that before?

F (43:11)

We have a lot of rain samples that are alarming. We don't know the totality of what's being put in this mix at any given time. We do know we have polymer fibers and graphene in the mix and both of those elements are used militarily as biological carrier platforms to carry a pathogen from the clouds to the ground. We know this with certainty. What's that doing in our rain? And what might they spray on us at any point in time? If they feel they're truly losing control? We could expect perhaps some form of biological weapon that's far worse than CV19. They hold that kind of power and Americans need to wake up with that. There is no place to hide from what we're breathing in the air column. We have to deal with this or we're not going to have much to care about for much longer.

C (43:52)

Dane Wigginton, thank you for always opening our eyes to this. We learn something every time we talk to you and this is no exception. Absolutely. We're going to dive more deeply into what's happening in Iran on this piece as well. And people need to wake up and demand accountability from their leaders. You got, as you pointed out, Lee Zeldin just basically covering this up and carrying the contaminated water pail for this continuing operation. Dane, great to see you. Thank you as always.

F (44:17)

Thank you both.

C (44:18)

Thank you, Dean. All right. Unbelievable.

B (44:21)

I'm pissed. I'm always pissed when I talk to him. No, he's lovely, but that is especially funny.

D (44:28)

Go ahead.

C (44:28)

Yeah, we're shutting off your water.

E (44:30)

No, that just, that's just like I, I'm always the same way. Like anytime he's on, I'm just like. It's sort of like talking about the ostriches. Like I'm now just sitting here like, like, just furious. Yeah, because like, you know, thinking about the guest that said finding stuff in the snow, know, it's like you can find that kind of stuff, but the, the to actually do like a chemical analysis of what it is, is such an expensive and laborious process. Nobody's going to do it. And so then it's just. You just get to see those things and be like, what is in this? And you'll never know. Yeah, because, I mean, the equipment to do it is. The equipment to do it is millions of dollars. Like, like, like aaps and stuff like that. So it's like, it's expensive stuff. You just can't. So it's like you, you know, you're. You're kind of screwed. You'll never know.

C (45:10)

Yeah, well, that's why we need the freaking government. We need RFK Jr who got the blessing of the, you know, President Trump. Like, it seemed like a number of months ago. Go out there and find out what this is. And then it's just been silence, radio silence since then.

B (45:23)

You're not actually saying we need the government to do something, right? That's what Thomas Soul says.

C (45:28)

Well, no, what I'm saying is, but if, you know, you would hope. Who has money to do it?

B (45:32)

The government would do it, right? Yeah.

C (45:34)

Or could you get some sort of grant? Can. Can Elon Musk do it? I don't know.

B (45:38)

I just thought my Spidey sense, I was like, wait, we never say that unredacted. We need the government, too. Well, kind of our thing.

C (45:44)

I'm just saying, who has the money to do it? Because these. Like a citizen who lives in a rural farm town to Phillips Point doesn't have the millions of dollars to analyze, you know, is. Is Monsanto.

B (45:55)

But as soon as someone says we need the government too, I'm like, yeah, well, by.

E (45:59)

By the government, though. Like, the government should. Should theoretically represent the people. So it should be a collective. Like the collective. The citizens of the United States for public health, paying our taxes. Yeah, it would be nice if they allocated a little bit of that to our public health.

C (46:18)

Just.

E (46:18)

Just a little bit.

C (46:19)

Just an idea.

B (46:20)

Right? Would be nice.

C (46:22)

Just an idea. Speaking of war, Grover, what do you think?

B (46:26)

He's also pissed. So pissed he went to sleep.

C (46:28)

Grover. Yeah, he's totally out.

B (46:32)

Yeah, he's.

C (46:34)

He's asleep in the studio.

B (46:36)

All right, coming up, we're going to talk about the CIA infiltrated Venezuela. That's not new, but CNN just woke up to it. Way to catch up. 30 years later, CNN. But okay, we're going to tell you a little bit more about what they're actually doing there. It doesn't have anything to do with.

C (46:51)

Drugs and Canada hiding its Nazi problem. How many Nazis are still being held In Canada. And why is the government going to great lengths to not tell you about it and keep this information from you? Is it to not hurt the opinions or not hurt the. What's the word I'm looking for? The feelings. Not hurt the feelings of a foreign country. What foreign country might be hurt if they learn that there are lots of Nazis hiding in Canada? We're going to tell you about that. We are. But first we're going to tell you about Coast. Because if you manage a crew, you construction, H Vac, landscapers, whatever. We just had a big crew in our house doing something with our humidifier and our whole house. Humidifier. Well then you already know they've got a whole team of people. When your guys like pay for gas and materials, it causes all types of issues. Car, you know, credit cards get borrowed. Trucks, trucks get fueled up when they're parked in the yard. Your accountant is chasing you for receipts at the end of the month. Maybe an employee filled up the their personal car. I mean, you've heard all the stories. Well, that's why Coast Pay is the modern fuel card and expense management tool built for fleets. I sent this to my father in law because he deals with this all the time with his landscaping crew in California. I said you've got to try this because this isn't solid software built by someone who's never run a crew. Fuel maintenance materials are all now on one card with real control and instant visibility. No contracts, no commitments. Just a smarter, simpler way to keep your operations tight and your crews on the move. And like unlike those old fuel cards, coast works everywhere that visa is accepted. Every gas station, every brand, every time your drivers aren't detouring just to find the one gas station that takes your card, your fuel card. So right now Coast Pay is offering our listeners free gas for a day when you get started@coastpay.com redacted. So go to coastpay.com redacted to get free gas for a whole day. Terms apply. That's coastpay.com redacted. The Coast Visa commercial credit card is issued by Celtic bank or Celtic Bank. All card accounts subject to credit card approval.

B (49:06)

All right, well, CNN reports today that the CIA is going to create a foothold in Venezuela. Here's their reporting. They're about 40 years late on this story, but okay, way to catch up. Good job. Now here is why this is crazy. The CIA, I'm going to prove to you, has been enabling the drug trade in Venezuela for decades. So you can't say that the Attack on Venezuela was about drugs when your own CIA enabled that drug trade, and then when you finally have influence in that country, you send in more CIA. That's crazy. Recently, whistleblower CIA whistleblower Kevin Shipp told us that the CIA has been involved in Venezuela since at least the creation of the Cartel of the Suns. But we can rewind even further than that. Listen to what he said.

G (49:56)

CIA has been involved in Venezuela going all the way back to the cartel called the Cartel of the sun, which is run by a general who was a proxy of the CIA who had gone in there and helped reconstitute his entire intelligence service with the goal of penetrating the entire Venezuelan government. And it turns out that the General, Ramon Julen was his name, was running narcotics the entire time and was the creator and the runner of the Cartel of the Sun. Now, the Cartel of the sun is what the Trump administration is using as a pretext to go in and stage attacks first on these boats and then actually in Venezuela itself. And of course, with its long history of doing this, the CIA was behind the Secret Service and the general in creating the drug trade and the, and, and some of the secret dealings back then and the eventual creation of the Cartel of the Sun. And the Trump administration is using the Cartel of the sun as a pretext because that way he can go around Congress.

B (51:05)

Okay, there was proof of this way before when the mainstream media seemed interested in not promoting the US government narrative. Here's a 60 Minutes piece from the 1990s. I can't show it to you because 60 Minutes always copyright strikes us. But they reported at the time that the CIA had collaborated with the Venezuelan National Guard generals who moved tons of cocaine into the United States on our population. We can rewind the clock even further. Do you recognize this guy? This is John Kerry, former presidential candidate in 1988. Now, in the mid-80s, he actually led a high priority profile series of congressional hearings called the Contra cocaine investigation. He was specifically looking for how was the US Government complicit in the Contra drug trade? The Reagan administration resisted the investigation and in fact, they even stonewalled the Senate. They attempted to discredit witnesses, and they assigned the CIA to monitor the probe rather than cooperate with it. Now, 10 years later, Kerry was vindicated by what's called the Hits Report. That's this if you want to seek it out yourself. This was the CIA Inspector General report authorized under Inspector General Frederick Hits. And in the. It came out in the late 90s. It concluded that while the CIA as an institution did not officially participate in cocaine trafficking during the Contra war. It knowingly maintained relationship relationships with and protected numerous Contra linked individuals and organizations involved in the drug trade when it judged them operationally important in order to keep the Contra war against Nicaragua alive and maintained US objectives in Central America, even if it meant enabling and protecting these drug lords for its own purposes. They also concluded that the CIA hid this from Congress, including in these probes. And this is how much. This is how we got so much drugs inside our own country. We knew it. Our CIA was allowing it and cooperating with it. Now recall that the Iran in Iran Contra comes from the US secretly selling weapons to Iran illegally and then funneling those profits to fund the Contras, the same network that was tied to cocaine trafficking. So it was all just one pipeline. It was arms to Iran, cash to the Contras, cocaine flooding our own borders with the CIA as the pimp in the whole thing. It's funny then that CNN wouldn't know that and would hilariously publish this headline that they're establishing a foothold. They're just getting there. They're new here. Now here's this line that really made me laugh. Laugh that the CIA. I know it's hard to see on your screen. The next one is there to relationship build with the locals. Oh, okay. The same locals that the US Government allowed to suffer under sanctions. Yes, thank you for laughing at that.

C (53:57)

Well, and also. You mean the thousands of people in the streets that are still protesting and actually want Maduro back in their country?

B (54:04)

No, not those people. Oh, not those people.

C (54:06)

Yeah, they're just canoodling. What about the.

E (54:07)

What about the. The people that are just kind of quietly disappeared by the CIA? Are. They are building a relationship? Is that. What kind of relationship is that? Because if I. If I formed relationships like that, if that was my dating strategy, I should and would be in prison for the rest of my life.

B (54:23)

You don't kidnap.

E (54:24)

That is not a good.

C (54:25)

You're not like Dexter.

E (54:26)

No, I do not. Oh, not at all.

C (54:28)

Put a bag over their head.

B (54:29)

Right. What about the ones, the locals that were terrorized by the drug lords that we enabled? Do we wanna. Do you think they want a good relationship with the CIA?

C (54:39)

They love the CIA down there, right? They really, really love the CIA.

B (54:43)

So the real question is, what is the CIA really gonna be doing with this new foothold in Venezuela now that their presence is no longer a state secret? This gives us a clue from the CNN report. It says they're gonna make sure that Russia and China have no influence so basically, it's not really about drugs. It's not about democracy. It's just about. Can I use the word C O, C, K. Blocking. You know what I mean? That's what it is.

G (55:12)

Sure.

B (55:12)

Yeah. That's what they're basically C blocking. Russia and China. They just, like, can't have it. Which tells us definitively that the capture of Maduro was never about drugs because we were complicit in the drugs, incidentally. It was because Venezuela had been trading oil with BRICS nations outside of the petrodollar since at least 2017. This hurt the sham hegemony that the US has on the global oil trade through the sham that is the petrodollar. So few years ago, Venezuela starts trading outside the petrodollar, we invade their country, and all of a sudden, look at this headline from just a few weeks ago. They love the petrodollar. The Petrodollar is the answer to all their problems. It's great.

C (56:00)

Of course, it's amazing, because three weeks ago, you were settling oil transactions in the yuan with China.

B (56:06)

So it's amazing. You guys, this is why the CIA is there, to make sure no one gets any crazy ideas about free trade with other nations. Because we don't play fair. That's how we do. So let us know what you think.

E (56:20)

I think it was yesterday.

C (56:21)

Go ahead.

F (56:22)

Go ahead.

C (56:22)

No, go ahead.

E (56:23)

I was gonna say, I think I said yesterday that, like, the thing that's so frustrating and just kind of almost amusing in a dark way is that this is what the CIA has always been doing. Like you just said, we've always been there, but. But now they're just like, you know what? We don't need to hide it anymore. Yes. That is what we're doing. We're gonna go in here, we're gonna assassinate some people. This is what we do. And we're proud of it now.

B (56:44)

Yeah.

C (56:44)

Deeply proud of it. You know, we're just. It's all out there in the open. Yeah. They used to operate in the shadows. I mean, look at Operation Mockingbird. Right inside of the. Inside of the news organizations, sneaking inside and infiltrating CBS News. Right? Becoming a part of CBS News, and no one knew about it. Yeah, we didn't know about it. And really, till the 1990s when we. You know, when we learned about Operation Mockingbird. Now it's just all out there in the open. Now they're openly on the payroll. I mean, hell, Mike Pompeo is like a Fox News contributor, right? Like a former head of the CIA is now a Fox News contributor. So they don't even have to hide it anymore.

B (57:15)

Yeah, yeah. It's wild. So let me know what you think of that history lesson. Go ahead.

E (57:21)

And I think it has a lot to do with it. Like, like, you know, like the strategy of tension being so successful that now they know, I think they can get away with it because where before the population as a whole would be up in arms to find out that they're besmirching the reputation of the United States. But now that they know that like one third of the population would, would gladly kill the other third of the population while the other third watched, like, now that they know that's the case, they don't have to worry about us anymore. Strategy of tension has worked.

B (57:48)

But who's right? Exactly.

E (57:51)

Exactly. Because, because they, they have, they have the third of the population that agrees with them, the third of the population that would oppose them, and a third of the population that are just too indifferent to give a shit.

C (58:00)

But they're worked. Right?

B (58:02)

Right. And then think about the welfare of the people of Venture Venezuela who may very well be well served trading their own oil outside of the petrodollar. They don't get that. You're not going to have that. We're going to make sure that you don't have that. So it's not good for either side, but no one's going to stop them.

C (58:19)

Anthony Starboy says JFK was killed by the CIA. Yes. And the Mafia. The CIA uses the mafia. That's their great partnership in all of this. Of course. And someone else just said every network go blue forever. Says all the major networks have a Pentagon reporter. Hello. That's Mockingbird Media right there. It's so obvious. Yes. When you're embedded inside the Pentagon. Okay, yeah, right, yeah. They're independent. The reason they get in there like the Jennifer Griffins of the world and these people is because they are, they are basically shills for the deep state. They, you know, if they want information leaked to them. The Kindle of the world from NBC News, all of these shillings chills. That's exactly how it flows. That's exactly where the information flows. Again, like earlier today when we reported on that New York Times piece, we were talking about Iran. Oh, how did, how did the New York Times get information that Trump had a classified briefing from his intelligence community about Iran. Yeah, right. Where did this information come from? It came right from the CIA right to the New York Times. That's how it works. That's exactly how it works. All right, coming up, we're going to talk about the Canada's Nazi problem and why they're hiding it from you and whose feelings they're worried about hurting. We're going to tell you about that. But first, is your money actually working for you or is it just sitting there doing nothing? Right now, if you've been parking cash in a savings account or a cd, hoping that it's going to grow, look, you already know the truth. It's not moving the needle. And if you're trying to ride the stock market, you're basically strapping your future towards a roller coaster. Do you want your family's future tied to that? There's finally a smarter option. It's one that thousands of everyday investors are already using to grow their wealth without volatility. I personally use it and so do my kids. We've actually structured our children's IRAs to actually be using this as well. And that is with earning and actually investing in real estate short notes. So if you've never heard of this before, like a lot of people want to get involved in real estate investing, but they don't have like $50,000 just sitting around as a down payment to buy a property. Well, can you then join a fund of other individuals who want to invest in projects, whether it's apartment complexes or townhomes, etc. And that's exactly where where our friends from Connect Invest come in and we have partnered with them. So you can actually, if you sign up today, you'll receive a $50 bonus. You have to use our link. If you just go to redacted in BNC Invest. And here's the best part. You can earn up to 9% annually. Yes, that's right. 9% predictable monthly income with returns up to 9%. So you can, and you can start with as little as 500. Yep, 500 bucks. So you don't have to have a lot of money to do it. You could just test the waters. Be like, hey, I'm going to give this a shot and see how well this performs.9% returns in that first year. So all you have to do is go to connectinvest.com redacted, create your free account, add $500 to your digital wallet. Then you choose the note that you want. 6 month note, 12 month note, 24 month note. It's totally up to you. And then you just watch that monthly income hit your account. You're helping to fund real commercial and residential projects across the United States while earning passive income every month. I personally do it. Huge believer in it. And again, we have our kids, our children's IRAs, investing in it so that you can, you know, you know how passionate I am. I'm not going to put my kids out there if it's not something that we believe in. Absolutely. I've been working with them for many, many years. The the team over at Connect Invest. So again, you want to get that $50 bonus, go to redacted.inc invest sign up today. $50 bonus and you can start with as little as $500. Totally up to you to get started. So our thanks to them for supporting the show and being a longtime partner. Love you guys over there. All right, why does Canada love to harbor and host Nazis? And why does it want to keep that quiet and not let you know about it? Could it have something to do with Ukraine? Well, more on that part of the story in a second. We've got some bombshell news here to share in a moment. But first, a little flashback for you. Do you remember when Ukrainian dictator Zelinsky came to Canada's Parliament? There were flowers and celebrations. There was lots of ass kissing, lots of hugging. They all want to get their hands on the little guy. Like he's like a little, like a little troll, you know, Everyone wants to hug the little guy. Well, Justin Trudeau was in fact, so happy to see his little friend that even invited a World War II to Ukrainian Nazi. Here's just a reminder. On September 22, 2023, Yaroslav Hunka, a Ukrainian Canadian who fought in the SS Division, the military wing of the Nazi party, the Waffen ss. He was invited to the House of Commons. He started crying because of the great display of affection from all those members of Parliament who gave him a standing ovation. He was recognized by Speaker Anthony Rota. Of course, we later learned that it was Trudeau who made the invitation. Yes, Trudeau's office made the invitation. Hunka, of course, received two standing ovations from all these House members, including Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau visiting Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelinsky. This is before he canceled elections. So he was still the elected leader at the time, before he became a dictator. They were very proud to celebrate their Nazis in Canada. The Ukrainian government is currently filled with neo Nazis, as you know. The Speaker Anthony Roda took the fall for it, though, and he resigned after he was thrown under the bus by Trudeau. Remember, it was Trudeau's office that invited the Nazi in the first place, but they threw him under the bus. Watch.

F (64:07)

This was deeply embarrassing for the House and for Canada. It is a good thing that Speaker Rota apologized personally, and I'm sure he's reflecting now on how to ensure the dignity of the House going forward.

C (64:25)

What a scumbag. But of course, this is just the beginning of the story. Turns out Canada has a long history of allowing Nazis into their country. In 1997, when it was revealed that Canada had allowed at least 2000, but probably more Nazis SS soldiers into the country, the worst of the worst. Well, last year, US Researchers at UCLA learned about a secret list that was drawn up in 1986 that cataloged every Nazi living in Canada so these criminals could be brought up on war crimes charges and tried. But not so fast list because on Friday we learned that the Canadian government moved to keep this list from ever seeing the light of day. Let me read to you from this Globe and Mail report here on your screen. A secret list of hundreds of alleged Nazi war criminals welcomed by Canada after the Second World War, drawn up 40 years ago, should remain secret, the information Watchdog ruled on Friday. The list of more than 700 suspected Nazi war criminals who settled in Canada has remained unpublished since it was drawn up as part of an Official inquiry In 1986, the Globe and Mail was among three organizations to file an Access to Information request to release Part 2 of the Commission inquiry on war crimes or war criminals in Canada, led by the retired Superior Court of Quebec Judge Jules Desches. Library and Archives Canada last year refused to release the second half of the report, citing the risk of potential harm to international relations and Canadian interests. Under Canada's Access to Information act, institutions can refuse to release information that, if disclosed, could be expected to harm the conduct of international affairs, defense or national security. But here, pay attention to this last paragraph. The Office of Information Commissioner said in an email the Globe on Friday that it accepted LAC's arguments that releasing the names could damage Canada's relations with a foreign power. Again, read that last sentence again. That could damage Canada's relations with a foreign power. Hmm. Harmful to a foreign power, you say. Which country still has Nazis running it? Which country has Nazis operating at the highest levels of government? If you'd guess Ukraine, you'd be correct. Read here this quote the Office of Information Commissioner said in an email to the Globe on Friday that it accepted LAC's arguments that releasing the names could damage Canada's relations with a foreign power. Some groups and individuals who were consulted by the government about whether to release the secret list had argued doing so could harm Ukraine. They said that Russian propaganda in the war against Ukraine could benefit from the disclosure that Ukrainian Nazis were among those who came to Canada. They expressed fears that the information could fuel Russian President Vladimir Putin's unfounded claim that the invasion of Ukraine amounts to a purge of Nazis. Okay. Actually, a large portion of the special military operation into Ukraine was, in fact, to purge large members of. Inside the. United. Inside of the Ukrainian government, of the Azov Battalion members and other neo Nazis in the government who are carrying out absolutely brutal and horrific killings against their own citizens, which we've cataloged here on this show. I encourage you to go back and watch our entire report with Benoit, who is from the French government and was in Ukraine as part of an operation to oversee the legal. You know, like, a lot of the legal ramifications that were unfolding in Ukraine watching of some of these, like, extrajudicial killings were being carried out. Go back and watch that entire report. It's shocking. And some of the stories that he's told me since then are just mind blowing. I'm talking about, like, the SBU and these neo Nazis going, like, door to door and, like, throwing people off of balconies, throwing Ukrainian citizens off of balconies, shooting and raping young women. Horrible stuff. And all true, by the way. All of it. True. So among the names on the list. Go ahead, Phil.

E (68:53)

Oh, I was just gonna say, like, I just want to kind of paraphrase what you just said, because, like, this is. It's just rattling around in my brain, and it's just batshit. What they're really saying is disclosing the truth and giving. Giving the enemy the power of truth in the matter would disrupt our propaganda campaign. So in even doing so, logically, what they're saying is what is true could be used against us by our enemies who would then know the truth. And it's like, really, what they're saying is we know that what we're doing is propaganda, and having the truth come out would make our propaganda not work. That's basically boiled down. That's what they're saying. That's all they're getting at.

C (69:34)

Right. So our propaganda machine is that it's Russian propaganda that there are Nazis living in Ukraine, and therefore we can't release a list of Nazis living in Canada because it might hurt Ukraine and therefore.

E (69:48)

Right, because then it would give. Yeah, exactly. Because it gives validity then to Russia's claim. And they're like, well, we can't have that. But that's the problem. It'd be different if they were like, Saying you can't go around spreading lies because then they can manipulate those lies to. Against us in their, in their like war in Ukraine. They're literally saying we can't let the truth out because then they can use the truth to justify what they said as the reason why they were invading in the first place.

C (70:17)

Exactly. Or at least a part of the reason why they were invading. Like it was never. That was never like the main mission. And so. But even they're making that up that this was the main mission of the special military operation to rid Nazis out of Ukraine, which even the United States own State Department on their website talks about the amount of neo Nazis in Ukraine. Like you can go to the State Department's own website from right before the war started and see as a list of grievances, one of the reasons why it's one of the most corrupt countries in the world and it's human rights violations. It's on the State Department's own website. So this isn't fake news. It was all true. It still is true and it still is a major problem. So. But this is why in Canada you can't find out the Nazis that have been secretly living there and we don't know where they are. Um, you have some really horrible people though, according to different sources. For instance, among the names on the list that has been seen by the Globe and Mail was Helmet Oberlander, a member of the Nazi Einsatz group and part of the death squads. Just living in. You living in Canada. Fine. Probably living. Probably have total access to their health care, by the way too. And all of the benefits of living in Canada. One of the Nazi Einsatz group and death squad members just living there. I mean, that's just one of hundreds, maybe thousands. Numbers seem like well over 2000, but unbelievable. So it looks like you guys aren't going to get any list of that. And of course, once the hunka was revealed, the Polish government wanted him extradited, brought over to Poland to be tried for war crimes.

F (71:55)

But he's too old.

C (71:57)

But he's not old enough to be invited to parliament and get a standing ovation. Right. Doesn't matter how many people he killed or doesn't matter. Doesn't matter that he fought against the Russians. We're going to celebrate him here in Canada and celebrate the fact that he was, he was a Nazi. I love the double standards here. It's pretty great. So let me know your thoughts on that in the comments below. And thanks to all of you for subscribing to the channel. It's. It's free to subscribe. If you're not already a subscriber here on redacted, whether on YouTube or X or on. On Rumble, you can just follow us. I think they call it following or subscribe, I don't know. But it's all free. So it's just. We do this show every day for you for free. We hope that we bring you value. Our team works really hard. We're not bought and paid for by anybody. We are supported by you and the few sponsors we have here on the show. We're not run by big pharma. We're not run by Israel. We're not run by. By the way, have you seen all this TikTok stuff? Holy smokes, man. Man, I hope TikTok just goes down in flames now. Larry Ellison owns it. And one of the first things that they do is go in and make sure that anybody who mentions the name Epsom Epstein in direct messages. Oh, you're not allowed to type that. That's now against their terms of service. You can't type the word Epstein. You can't really criticize Israel at all anymore inside of TikTok now that Larry Ellison owns the damn thing. So they've seen a massive surge in unsubscribes. It's like 150% surge in people unsubscribing and closing their accounts for TikTok. So way to go. Way to go. I hope that thing goes down in flames. Absolutely. So it'd just be. So it'd be kind of poetic justice, right? Oh, you're going to censor us now? We're not allowed to criticize the evil government of Benjamin Netanyahu. You can't criticize soldiers shooting children in the head. You can't criticize a genocide. Okay, we're out. Sorry. Not that we were using it anyway, but anyway, have you seen the new app? So it's. What is it unscrolled? Is that the name of it? Unscrolled or upscrolled? I think it's upscrolled. Is it upscrolled? So let me see if it's. Is it upscrolled? I don't know. Does anyone know Upscrolled?

E (74:12)

I've never heard of it.

C (74:13)

So we featured it in the newsletter yesterday how over the weekend, people were looking for an alternative. So this app out of Australia has now surged. It's exploding. It's now number one. So it was, like, ranked 10th over the weekend. Now it's number one for social media, people are ditching TikTok. They're canceling their TikTok accounts because by the way, if you log into TikTok, you'll see a new terms of service in there, which is basically geotargeting you. They want to know down to the, like the exactly where you're standing in your house, basically for geotargeting. So upscrolled has seen a surge following TikTok's takeover in the United States. People, according to Engadget here, you can take my screen here if you want. In a second. People are uninstalling TikTok and downloading this indie competitor called upscrolled. And yeah, it has 150% rise in uninstalls. TikTok, according to analytics firm Sensor Tower, which tracks downloads and other app store metrics. And TikTok's daily active users have increased about 2% in the same period. They're flat week over week. TikTok, though, blamed a power outage at a data center for this, affecting their view counts and load times. Sure. But anyway, upscrolled, let's see if I can pull this up here. Yeah, here's upscrolled. So I signed up there. You can follow me over there if you'd like. Clayton Morris, Natalie is on there as well. We're getting the redact, you know, getting the whole team over there. So anyway, and I love the what it says here on the front page, it says shadow banned. Shadow banned. Elsewhere, not here. Upscrolled is the social platform where every voice gets equal power. No shadow bans, no algorithmic games, no pay to play favoritism, just authentic connection where your content reaches the people who matter most. Of course, you know, it seems like every year this kind of stuff happens though, you know, everyone jumps to. What was that Chinese one like last year? Red book or something like that. You know, I don't know whatever happened with that. But anyway, it is what it is, so we'll see. But I, I, unless you want to be tracked and you want to be censored, probably want to uninstall and delete. Tick tock also the same with like Instagram and all of that crap, to be honest with you. But anyway, thank you guys for subscribing, being a part of our show. We really appreciate it. And we'll be back here tomorrow at 4pm Eastern Time. You can join us, set those alerts so you know when we're live. At 4pm Eastern time, we have Senator no. Yeah, Senator Rand Paul will be on the show tomorrow. So Senator Paul will be joining us right off the top of the show tomorrow. So please be here tomorrow at 4:00pm Eastern Time. Have a great night everyone. Resolutions got you down. Scoop it or swirl it. That's the sound of not giving up. The Ninja Creamy Diet helps you turn protein shakes, vegan milk and lower sugar recipes into rich creamy ice cream at home. No skimping on flavor. Eat dessert. Hit your macros.

F (77:39)

Repeat.

C (77:40)

No sacrifice, no stress. Just ice cream that fits your goals. Treat without the cheat. Start the Ninja Creamy Diet today.