wavePod

Get Wave AI

FROM THE VAULT: Ruby Franke: Monster Momfluencer | #364 - RedHanded | Wave AI Podcast Notes

Back to RedHanded

FROM THE VAULT: Ruby Franke: Monster Momfluencer | #364

RedHanded

Mon Jan 05 2026

Summary

RedHanded Podcast Episode #364

FROM THE VAULT: Ruby Franke: Monster Momfluencer
Release Date: January 5, 2026

Episode Overview

In this chilling and highly requested episode, hosts Hannah and Esther unpack the disturbing case of Ruby Franke, the Mormon "momfluencer" behind the ultra-popular YouTube channel "8Passengers." What started as a wholesome family vlogging enterprise spiraled into a harrowing story of child abuse, cult-like indoctrination, and the dangers of unchecked online fame. The hosts examine how Franke, with the support of her collaborator Jodi Hildebrandt, concealed calculated torture and neglect of her six children—all in broad daylight and with millions watching.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

The Case’s Shocking Introduction

Opening Narrative: Hannah recounts how 12-year-old Russell Franke showed up at a neighbor’s house, emaciated, dirty, shoeless, and with duct-taped wrists and ankles, begging for help.
- “This little boy was Russell Frankie. And his voice trembled as he begged the man to ring the police.” (Hannah, 00:53)
911 Call Audio: Heart-wrenching audio underscores the severity of Russell’s state.
- “He’s emaciated, he’s got tape around his legs. He’s hungry and he’s thirsty.” (911 Operator, 01:35)

Ruby Franke’s Public Persona vs. Private Horrors

Ruby’s vlogging persona presented the family as the idyllic, disciplined Mormon household—an image consumed by millions.
Esther and Hannah emphasise how the real story was far more sinister: evidence of torture, starvation, psychological and physical abuse, and religious fanaticism.
- “She seemed like the beautiful, idealised picture of disciplined Mormon motherhood. But after police raided her house, they discovered… calculated torture, days of starvation and religious fanaticism.” (Esther, 04:05)

Rise of “8Passengers” and The Family Vlogging Industry

Launched in 2015, "8Passengers" reached 2.5 million subscribers, posting hundreds of videos depicting family life, discipline, and schooling.
Concerns were voiced early by viewers over consent, privacy for children, and increasing on-camera punishment.
- “Some commentators were uncomfortable with issues around consent and parents profiting off shoving cameras in their kid’s faces…” (Hannah, 08:49)

The Slippery Slope of Family Vlogging:

Discussion on psychological and social harms of family vlogging, including humiliation and exploitation for brands and ad dollars.
Notable moment: Hannah draws parallels to “prank” family channels which inflict genuine trauma for entertainment.
- “The humiliation of that on a young psyche. These people are just not thinking, yeah.” (Hannah, 10:54)

Ruby Franke’s Disturbing Parenting Tactics

Documented “punishments” escalate through the years:
- Withholding food as discipline.
  - “Eating is a basic human right, not a privilege. Because if you don’t eat, you quite literally die.” (Esther, 21:26)
- Public shaming for bed-wetting (in sponsored content), invading privacy, isolating children.
- Threats with violence toward favorite toys, cruel control over emotional development.

Viral Outrage & Community Pushback:

The infamous “No Lunch for Eve” video: Ruby ignores her six-year-old’s forgotten lunch, hoping “nobody gives her food.”
- “I hope you were in pain and discomfort all day and I hope no one gives you food so that you remember not to forget your lunch again.” (Hannah, 24:02)
Outrage peaks with punishment like Chad losing his bed for 7 months over a harmless prank.
Public petitions call for CPS involvement but laws lag behind:
- “Sleeping on a beanbag and being treated horribly… isn’t legally classed as child abuse.” (Hannah, 29:20)

Escalation & Collapse of the Franke Household

Increasingly severe punishments and isolations; younger children denied Christmas presents as “the gift of truth.”
The “8Passengers” channel slows to inactivity amid blowback and legal scrutiny.
Transition to “Connections Classroom”: Ruby remakes herself as a “mental fitness coach” with Jodi Hildebrandt, peddling extreme, cult-like advice.

The Role of Jodi Hildebrandt & Cult Tactics

Jodi becomes Ruby's confidante, therapist, and business partner, wielding enormous influence.
History of abuse and overreach as therapist emerges (e.g., accusations of “porn addiction,” emotional isolation, cultic interventions).
Jodi manipulates Ruby’s family, separates her from husband Kevin and eldest children, and ultimately moves Ruby and her youngest to her desert compound.
- “Jodi is like the laziest couple [therapist]. She just needs one couple at a time.” (Hannah, 44:16)

Parallels and Patterns in Abuse:

Jodi’s niece and former clients describe eerily similar duct-taping, isolation, and accusations of evil across years.
- “To them, this was all too familiar. Jessie has since described the harrowing abuse that they suffered when they went to live with their Aunt Jody.” (Esther, 56:19)

Rescue & Unveiling of the Full Horror

Timestamp: 48:12–54:29

Police finally intervene after Russell's escape.
Eve is found emaciated, traumatized, in a cupboard—evidence of systematic torture, starvation, and cult-like brainwashing.
Discovery of a panic room stocked for intentional, repeated child abuse.
- “The police turned down a corridor and in the middle of a dark cupboard, they found Eve. The nine year old girl is painfully thin. She was sitting alone in the middle of the space… It would take the police a total of four hours to get her to leave the room at all. And then she finally ate some pizza.” (Esther, 51:07)

Ruby’s Diary of Atrocities

Authorities find Ruby’s diary, chronicling forced starvation, isolation, binding and punishment rationalized by claims of “demons” and “evil.”
- “She writes about starving Eve and Russell… The short entries often reference Russell being possessed by the devil and Ruby justifies starving him by scrawling, ‘I will not feed a demon.’” (Hannah, 54:29)

Aftermath: Arrest, Conviction, and Sentencing

Timestamp: 57:40–65:27

Ruby and Jodi arrested and charged with six counts of aggravated child abuse.
Both continue to rationalize actions, portraying themselves as victims of a witch hunt.
- “Your little boy’s bones are showing. But Ruby was having none of it. She called the whole thing a witch hunt and claimed the devil had been after her for years. You are the devil.” (Esther & Hannah, 58:22–58:51)

Legal Outcomes:

Ruby and Jodi each sentenced to up to 30 years in Utah State prison.
Kevin Franke divorced Ruby, seeks custody but remains under scrutiny.
Franke children placed in state care; Shari and Chad build independent lives.

Notable Quotes & Moments

On Family Vlogging:
- “Anything and everything was content.” (Esther, 14:32)
- “Was it worth it? Was it worth it? Like there are so many issues with this kind of thing.” (Hannah, 10:54)
On Parenting as Abuse:
- “Sometimes they are [monsters]. I feel increasingly… hard to defend the stance that somebody who starves her children to the point that they are at the brink of death is not a monster.” (Hannah, 04:48)
On Collusion & Cult Dynamics:
- “Jodi, meanwhile, goes on a charm offensive, claiming she’s nervous and she’s done nothing wrong… the pair see themselves as the victims here.” (Hannah, 57:37)
On Public Blindness:
- “It’s the fact of the public nature again, and the fact that she got away with it for so long and that nobody stepped in to save these children when red flags were apparent.” (Hannah, 63:37)
On Broader Implications:
- “Don’t take parenting advice from crazy people on the Internet. And if you don’t like kids, don’t have them.” (Hannah, 67:15)

Important Timestamps

00:53: Discovery of Russell Franke and the 911 call
04:05: Introduction of Ruby Franke’s secret abuse
08:49: Ethical concerns around family vlogging
13:02–14:30: On-camera shaming and privacy violations
21:26: Food deprivation as “discipline”
24:23: Viral outrage over lunch deprivation
27:42: Chad’s removal from his room and the “beanbag punishment”
29:20: Petition for CPS intervention, legal limits
32:35: Hiatus of “8Passengers,” move to “Connections Classroom”
34:52–35:17: Cult-like principles, radical denial of children’s rights
38:02–41:40: Jodi’s prior abuses – cultic isolation tactics
43:12–44:16: Ruby completely isolated, family collapse
48:12–54:29: Russell’s escape, police rescue, discovery of abuse, panic room
54:29–56:04: Ruby’s diary and explicit records of torture
57:37: Ruby and Jodi’s arrests, final horror of their plans
62:13–64:36: Sentencing, lack of remorse, cycles of abuse

Tone & Delivery

Hannah and Esther maintain their trademark mix of dark humor and unflinching examination. They oscillate between incredulity, horror, and frustration—often interjecting with acerbic asides, memorable one-liners, and reflections on wider cultural implications. Their style remains direct, conversational, and deeply empathetic to the victims.

Takeaways

The Ruby Franke case is a harrowing example of how abuse can be hidden in plain sight—amplified, not exposed, by social media.
The episode serves as a cautionary tale against the unchecked dynamics of family vlogging, weak legal protections, and the seductive power of online influencers.
Both hosts emphasize the need for vigilance, healthy skepticism towards “parenting experts,” and the importance of listening to children.

Final Words:
“If you are a parent and you’re having a tough time, you’re probably doing a perfectly good job. Don’t go to anybody who says they can fix all your problems.” (Hannah, 67:47)

Loading summary...

Transcript

Hannah (0:00)

Foreign. I'm Hannah and welcome to Red Handed, where this week we're keeping it kind of current. Not as current as last weeks, but this is one that has been heavily, heavily also requested by you guys. And it's a weird one.

Esther (0:25)

I feel like I saw so much coverage and sort of kept up with it, but I had no idea it was this bad.

Hannah (0:32)

No, no, no, no. There's often a lot of criticism that befools YouTubers. Rightly, wrongly, whatever. I do feel like they do tend to get sucked into a lot more drama than podcasters, but this one definitely transcends, like a bit of YouTube drama. This is bonkers.

Esther (0:52)

Yeah.

Hannah (0:53)

It was a hot summer morning in the Utah desert when an elderly man answered the door to find a young boy looking back at him. The child appeared to be weeks from death. His tiny legs like matchsticks poking out from underneath an oversized, blood stained shirt. He was dirty, shoeless, and had duct tape wrapped around his wrists and ankles. This little boy was Russell Frankie. And his voice trembled as he begged the man to ring the police. Here is a 911 call. You can hear the man choking back tears.

911 Operator (1:35)

I just had a 12 year old boy show up here at my front door asking for help and he says he just came from a neighbor's house. He's emaciated, he's got tape around his legs. He's hungry and he's thirsty.

Esther (1:52)

Need someone immediately.

911 Operator (1:54)

But he has duct taped around his.

Hannah (1:56)

Big injuries.

911 Operator (1:57)

There's swords around him. Yeah, there's sores around him. I think the good chance he's been.

Hannah (2:03)

He also has.

911 Operator (2:04)

Oh, and he has it around his ankle. I mean his wrists as well.

Esther (2:07)

Okay.

911 Operator (2:07)

This boy has been.

Esther (2:09)

Needs immediate attention.

911 Operator (2:13)

Hannah (8:49)

At this time, family vlogging was all the rage. But concern was already beginning to brew in the comments section. Some commentators were uncomfortable with issues around consent and parents profiting off shoving cameras in their kids faces all concerns I think that are perfectly valid. And look, there's obviously like one brand of it which is very much what the Frankies start off with, which is just like, oh, look at our perfect lives, we're so fun and like, these are my kids and like we go on trips and blah blah, blah. But there are ones where it's like the prank ones, right, where it's like families, but they incorporate this kind of comedy prank style. And I've seen some horrendous clips, like while we were researching this case, and I'm not attributing this to Ruby Frankie, but again, it shows you the problematic nature of what some of these people are doing. There's one where the parents make a total mess in the living room, like pen all over the sofas, all over the carpet, throw paint around, like a severe level of destruction to their own living space. And then they bring the kids in and they're like, right, who did this? And they know that none of them did it, but they berate them in front of the camera to basically get the children to react. And they, they hone in on one child saying, we know you did it, we know you're lying. Like fuzzy, how is this fucking funny? You're torturing this child psychologically. And the child is crying, begging, screaming, shouting, losing his temper, saying that he didn't do it, he didn't do it, he didn't do it. And then after like 10 minutes of this, they're like, haha, we're just kidding. And I'm like, the damage you've done to that child, was it worth it? Was it worth it? Like there are so many issues with this kind of thing. And the more validation that some of these vloggers were getting, the more attention they were getting the competition amongst themselves, they're just upping the ante. They're trying to push it further and further and further, be more outrageous, be more clickbaity. But again, that's fine if you're just an individual adult. The fact is these people were dragging their children into it. And not just the psychological harm it does for as a parent, you to act like that towards a child. It's the fact that it is now public and the world is laughing at your child. The humiliation of that on a young psyche. These people are just not thinking, yeah.

Hannah (18:29)

I just think it is so unbelievable because I'm not a parent, but I would presume that after my children's health, their happiness is the key concern. The fact that you knowingly are doing this and it is going to culminate in your child being bullied at school. It's just shocking. It's like she's jumping over all of the biologically hardwired things in her brain to not harm her children for money. But of course, it wasn't just the momager mindset and her tendency to reach for a camera before helping her kids that garnered criticism. It was also Ruby Franke's parenting style. She was nothing if not a disciplinarian. But some of the treatment of her children went further than just being strict, and she began to cause alarm. I honestly also, I'm like parenting styles and the way people personally parent is one of the things for which you are going to get criticized the most, because everybody does it differently. Everybody has different opinions. I see it starting to happen among my friends who have had kids. They have very different opinions on what's right and what's wrong. And I wouldn't do it like that. So you're already setting yourself up for this kind of criticism by doing a mommy vlog like this. But on top of that, she's also nuts. Mm. So, yeah. This concern started to spill out in the comment sections. Other vloggers began making videos about Ruby's penchant for punishment. Classic. Classic. YouTube drama. But inevitably this drove yet more people to her account, because no publicity is bad publicity. And she attracted more than a billion views in total, earning the Frankies a reported $2 million million dollars. Ruby and Kevin tried to enforce what they called natural consequences to their kids behavior. But these were often very harsh. In one video, when little Russell commits the cardinal sin of leaving a sock in the garden, his mum shouts at him on camera. She then makes him get down and do press ups. In another video, Eve is caught using scissors to cut things at home. Apparently a big no no. So Ruby gets down on her level, holding her youngest child's favorite teddy bear and threatens to decapitate it. If you cut one more thing in.

Hannah (24:34)

No, if I was the teacher I would have called child protective services because there is a big problem here. But she doesn't even need to because this is all content on her incredibly popular YouTube channel. So yeah, ironically, this video, which is all about natural consequences, well, they led to a lot of natural consequences for Ruby Franke because the video went somewhat viral and people obviously naturally thought that Ruby was cruel and said as much online. But while much of the harsh parenting tactics were levelled at Russell and Eve, the two youngest, it was teenager Chad that was labelled as the problem child. Chad, who actually looks a bit like a young Chad. Michael Murray, which is curious, just seemed like a typical teenage boy. He was on his school's American football team. He's good looking, he's good humoured. But in 2019 he completely disappeared from the eight passengers channel and the followers noticed Cries of Where's Chad? Flooded the comments section. But by August, people had their answer. Ruby told viewers that she had sent her son to a wilderness camp for troubled teens for 10 weeks. Like Paris Hilton, this saw Chad going on daily long hikes wearing a heavy backpack with minimal food, water or sanitation. Now, many who have attended such programs in America describe the experience as traumatizing. Kids have even died in the past. But that's another story for another time. What we can tell you is a lot of these sort of camps do not have a stellar reputation for the welfare of the children that are there. And look, if you are the parent of a child, and again, not a parent, just guessing who is off the rails, totally wild. Drugs, drink, maybe driving without a license, stealing, acting completely nuts, and you are at the end of your tether and maybe you're like, this camp is our only option. We've got to try it. Maybe as we'll go on to see, that's not really what's going on with Chad at the start. So when we ask why Chad was sent to this camp, his father Kevin explained that it was due to an accumulation of things. Still, if things were so bad and your child needed help, why tell the world about it?