ShortHand: Did Jesus Exist?

Summary

---

RedHanded Podcast — ShortHand: Did Jesus Exist?

Date: March 31, 2026
Hosts: Skeptical Historian & Moderate Historian

---

Episode Overview

This episode of RedHanded's "ShortHand" series dives into the provocative question: Did Jesus really exist? The hosts investigate the shifting landscape of historical belief, analyzing scholarly consensus, biblical sources, and external references to address whether Jesus of Nazareth was a real historical figure or a mythical construction. Along the way, the conversation unpacks arguments from both sides with skepticism, wit, and a touch of irreverence.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. The Question at Hand: Separating Myth from History

• The hosts immediately clarify the episode's aim: not whether Jesus was the miracle-working Son of God, but rather if a preacher named Yeshua (Jesus) lived, taught, and was executed in 1st-century Palestine.
  • “The question is, is there reliable evidence that a man named Jesus of Nazareth lived in Palestine about 2,000 years ago, preached about Galilee and drew a loyal following for his teachings?” – Moderate Historian [04:16]

2. The Skeptic’s Corner: Arguments for Doubt

• The 19th-century rise of the "Jesus Myth" theory, detailed in three main skeptical positions:
  1. The New Testament as History: The New Testament is not an unbiased historical record; relying on it is “like using Netflix to prove the existence of Squid Game.” – Skeptical Historian [05:41]
  2. The Silence of Contemporaries: Jesus is not mentioned in any non-Christian writings until decades after he allegedly died; no eyewitness accounts are available, despite other extensive records for that era.
  3. Dependent & Thin External Mentions: References that do exist in later Roman and Jewish sources are brief, second-hand, or potentially influenced by Christians.

3. The Evidence: What Actually Exists?

• Archaeology: Largely a dead end; famous relics (Shroud of Turin, Holy Grails) are not serious historical evidence.
• Biblical Sources:
  • Pauline Epistles: Earliest Christian texts, written ~20 years after Jesus's death; emphasize theology but almost nothing about Jesus’s life. However, Paul claims contact with Jesus’s brother James—a strong, if indirect, hint toward historicity. [07:44]
  • Gospels: Written for Christians, reflect current events in 1st-century Palestine and are thus somewhat valuable as historical context, even if biased and embellished.

Notable Quote

"Events that happen in and around the stories in the Gospels accurately match up with other accounts of goings on in Palestine at the time. And that is a big tick for historians." – Skeptical Historian [08:42]

4. Embarrassment as Evidence

• "Why make your hero embarrassing?"
  • Many early Christians included unflattering stories about Jesus and his followers, such as failed miracles, embarrassing executions, or bickering disciples.
  • Historians argue this points to authenticity—why invent a flawed messiah for your new religion?
  • But the hosts call this a sophisticated narrative move, not proof of real events:

    “It is a far more sophisticated story to tell it in this way.” – Moderate Historian [11:56] “You can have an infallible God. They already do. He’s up there. The whole point of Jesus being literally the Son of Man is that he’s fallible, just like you and me.” – Skeptical Historian [10:28]

5. Non-Christian Witnesses: Josephus, Tacitus, and Others

• Flavius Josephus (Jewish historian, c. 90 AD):
  • Mentions Jesus twice, one passage likely altered by Christian editors, but still likely based on an original, neutral reference.
  • Quotes: "There lived Jesus, a wise man ... a doer of startling deeds ... Pilate had condemned him to be crucified." – Skeptical Historian [16:36]
• Tacitus (Roman historian, 116 AD):
  • Describes “Christus executed by Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius,” aligning with Gospel timelines; considered hostile and thus useful as an outside reference.
• Others:
  • Mara Bar-Serapion refers to "executing their wise king" (believed to be Jesus) [18:58]
  • Pliny the Younger observes early Christians worshipping "Christ as a God"
  • Early Jewish rabbinic sources describe Jesus as an illegitimate sorcerer

6. Counter-Arguments from Mythicists

• All external references are late and might just repeat Christian claims (no independent, contemporary confirmation)
• Gospel accounts often contradict each other
• The evidence bar is simply too low for certainty

7. Consensus in Academia

• Most modern historians, regardless of religious belief, agree Jesus was very likely a real historical person, though miraculous elements are not taken as facts.

  “It’s considered actually to be a pretty fringe theory [to deny Jesus’s existence]. ... I don’t know any mainstream scholar who doubts the historicity of Jesus. Myers likens the Jesus myth theory to climate change denial.” – Moderate Historian [30:38]

• Even key Roman figures like Pontius Pilate have limited evidence, though slightly better than Jesus.

8. Comparing Existometers: How Does Jesus Stack Up?

| Figure | Historical Evidence | |--------------------|-------------------------| | Julius Caesar | Overwhelming: writings, coins, statues [26:50] | | Muhammad | Strong: biographies, independent references, inscriptions | | Socrates | Moderate: pupil accounts, no writings of his own [28:09] | | Homer | Doubtful: legendary status, likely a collective name | | Boudicca/Spartacus| Weak: dramatic stories, few accounts, decades later [29:40] | | King Arthur | Almost none: 400+ years later references [30:19] |

“Compared to them, you could argue that the evidence Jesus existed is stronger.” – Skeptical Historian [29:40]

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the Mythicist Position:
  "It's like using Netflix to prove the existence of Squid Game." – Skeptical Historian [05:43]

• Summing Up the Scholarly View:
  "History is all about probabilities ... if you strip away any claims of Jesus’s importance ... you have a man called Yeshua Bar Joseph ... who lived in Palestine ... gained close followers before being executed ... and that I could believe." – Skeptical Historian [24:50]

• On Why Jesus’ Story Endures:
  "Whether you believe it or not, it’s why it’s so enduring." – Moderate Historian [12:13]

• Irreverent Banter:
  “He has to be of us as well as the divine for him to matter, and everybody doubts their faith.” – Moderate Historian & Skeptical Historian [11:32]

• On Comparing Resistance Religions:
  “People living under Roman occupation in and around the time of Jesus ... all over the world, religions ... pop up as resistance.” – Skeptical Historian [28:58]

• Skeptical Humour:
  “No one’s crusading over Homer, you know.” – Skeptical Historian [28:23]

---

Important Timestamps

• [01:31] — Warm (and irreverent) intro framing the big question
• [03:51] — “No one knows for sure”: The limits of ancient history
• [05:41] — Three core arguments for Jesus mythicism
• [07:44] — Evaluating Paul and the Epistles as sources
• [08:42] — The Gospels: biased but useful for context
• [09:17] — “Embarrassment” argument for authenticity
• [15:37] — Josephus and Tacitus: external “evidence”
• [18:58] — Additional non-Christian references
• [20:40] — Pagan sacrifice and the logic of martyrdom
• [22:30] — Probability in history and illiteracy issues
• [26:50] — Contrast with other historical figures
• [30:38] — Modern scholarly consensus
• [31:46] — End reflections: “So why do I feel so empty?”

---

Tone and Style

The hosts blend skeptical inquiry with dark humour, dry asides, and lively debunking. Their irreverence adds colour to the historical analysis, keeping the episode both insightful and highly accessible.

---

Final Takeaways

• While direct evidence is elusive, and all sources are partial or late, the overall academic consensus still leans heavily toward Jesus of Nazareth having been a real historical figure.
• His life, stripped of miracle and myth, fits plausibly within 1st-century Palestine, bolstered by multiple layers of indirect references.
• The more radical mythicist position is now generally seen as a fringe view, akin (in one quote) to climate denial.
• Ultimately, history deals in probabilities, not certainties—especially when it comes to ancient provincial figures—yet Jesus’s existence is more likely than not by the standards applied to comparable historical characters.

---

Endnotes & Fun Facts

• The episode ends on a lighter note, discussing oddities about Easter’s dating and “Fig Tuesday”—when, allegedly, Jesus cursed a fig tree.
• Skeptical Historian closes: “The mass has ended. Go forth in peace.” [33:02]

---

Transcript

[Mike Bolo]

Tired of juggling sales tools or spending hours on prospecting just to book a few meetings? Meet Apollo, the go to market platform

[Bob Garfield]

for finding leads, connecting with buyers and closing deals all in one place. Apollo gives you access to over 210 million contacts and AI that handles all your busywork, finding leads, drafting emails, and even prioritizing your day. So stop paying for five different sales tools when one does it all. Visit Apollo I.O. and sign up free today.

[Mood.com Advertiser]

Let's be honest. Buying cannabis shouldn't be complicated, sketchy or low quality. That's why I want to tell you about Mood.com that's M-O-Ood.com Mood ships federally legal cannabis straight to your door. No medical card, no hassle. And here's the kicker. The quality is better than anything you'll find at your local dispensary. Yeah, I said it. Whether you're into edibles, concentrates, flour, or just looking to explore, go. You'll find it all at Mood. And it's not just the variety that makes them stand out. Every product is sourced from small American owned family farms that care deeply about what they grow. It's cannabis you can trust, delivered discreetly and ready to elevate your mood. And because you're a listener, you get 20% off your first order. Just head to mood.com, that's M-O-Ood.com to get started.

[Skeptical Historian]

Hello, hello, welcome my brothers and sisters in Christ. We are here today to talk to you about Jesus. Knock knock, ding dong.

[Moderate Historian]

Have you, have you heard of Jesus?

[Skeptical Historian]

Have you met Jesus, the Messiah, the Lamb of God? Emmanuel Savior, King of Kings, One of the most recognizable faces and well known figures in human history, perhaps the number one. This man is so widely celebrated, in fact, there are more than two and a half billion Christians that ground their life's beliefs in his teachings. And for those billions, it could not be more important that God sent His only son to earth to suffer on the cross, die for our sins, and in doing so, give the rest of us eternal life.

[Moderate Historian]

In recent years, some Christians have started to accept that some parts of Jesus's life as told in the Bible are probably not totally true.

[Skeptical Historian]

And that's when you don't include the gospels that were left out where he kills dragons.

[Moderate Historian]

Oh, fun. Yeah.

[Skeptical Historian]

That's why we don't know anything about his life until he's 33 is because he was just like bopping around killing dragons. Killing dragons.

[Moderate Historian]

But in the past few centuries, a growing movement has gone through the history books and taken it one Step further and their conclusion is the ultimate sacrilege. Not only that Jesus didn't perform miracles, not only that he wasn't the Son of God, they say that he never even existed.

[Skeptical Historian]

A recent survey by the Church of England revealed that 40% of adults in England didn't believe that Jesus was a real historical figure. So what evidence is there of the most famous man of all time? Was he a random itinerant preacher in Galilee whose followers got so carried away with his magic tricks that they started a whole thing? Or was he just a figment of his supporters imagination, a symbol cooked up decades later to legitimise a growing religious sect? It's time to get to the gospel truth. This is the shorthand.

[Moderate Historian]

The first very very important thing to point out here is that no one knows for sure. Good arse covering. Getting it in early, managing some expectations. History is always guesswork for any historical event. From Egyptian death rites to the Great Fire of London, you're gathering all the evidence you can to build the most likely picture of what happened. Anyone who was actually there is obviously long dead.

[Skeptical Historian]

They were long dead when the Gospels were written as well.

[Moderate Historian]

You're relying on a patchwork of fragments of mostly very biased accounts. And there's no real way to definitively tell fact from fiction. In fact, the vast majority of human history is totally undocumented. Entire civilizations have risen and fallen and left absolutely no trace at all. That doesn't mean they didn't exist. Just ask Graham Hancock. And then with Jesus we have to be even more specific because today we're not really asking whether a miracle working, water walking, 5000 feeding, temple sacking, fig tree, zapping, son of God really walked the earth and died for our sins? The question is, is there reliable evidence that a man named Jesus of Nazareth lived in Palestine about 2,000 years ago, preached about Galilee and drew a loyal following for his teachings?

[Skeptical Historian]

Some would say a big fat no. First and foremost, his name was never Jesus. His name was Yeshua bar Joseph and he was a carpenter, if he existed at all. Anyway, for my money I would be amazed if I am convinced otherwise. I think that Yeshua bar Joseph probably existed. I would even buy that he was crucified by the Romans. The end.

[Moderate Historian]

Done.

[Skeptical Historian]

We'll see you next week anyway, right? The movement to prove that Jesus was a fraud started in the 19th century and they organized their argument around three main positions. The first position being that you cannot trust the New Testament. Using the Bible as any kind of actual historical evidence is bonkers and anti academic. It's like using Netflix to prove the existence of Squid Game. The second position is that Jesus is barely mentioned anywhere. There are no non Christian references to Jesus until decades after he supposedly died. There are zero eyewitness accounts, despite there being a lot of people writing stuff down at the time. And historians like Seneca the Elder and the younger one wrote all sorts of stuff about first century Judea without mentioning Jesus of Nazareth at all, not once. And then the third position is that even those texts that do mention Jesus later on don't have much in them in the way of evidence and are far too dependent on Christian sources to be reliable. So let's take a look at what they are talking about.

[Moderate Historian]

Well, as far as physical, archaeological proof, well, there's not much. Artefacts like the Shroud of Turin or any of the hundreds of cups claimed to be the Holy Grail aren't taken particularly seriously by historians. So the best bet is hitting the books, looking at any mentions from Christian, Jewish and Roman writers from around that time. And the first place to look is is the place where the vast majority of our information about Jesus's life comes from. The Bible. Okay, yes, we know the Bible was written by believers at least 20 years after Jesus's death and they had a big theological narrative to push. So we take the details with a big pillar of salt, but it's not nothing and we'll explain why.

[Skeptical Historian]

The very earliest writing to mention Jesus at all was The Epistles of St. Paul, believed to have been written about 20 years after Jesus died, about 50 CE. The Epistles do mention Jesus more than 200 times. And Paul doesn't hold back, calling Jesus the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. In him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell. And the Epistles are big on big Reverend statements like that, but thin on details, barely anything about Jesus's life, his stories or his sayings. There are no parables, no miracles and no origin story. But Paul does mention meeting several people who knew Jesus personally, including Jesus's brother James. And if you didn't know that Jesus had siblings, now you do. Let's move on to the Gospels. These are the main accounts of Jesus's life in the Bible. Everything from the virgin birth in a manger through the wayward teen years. There's not really that much of them. Miracles, prophecies, and then the execution on the cross to save humanity. At 33. The Gospels are Christian books for Christians. But there is a reason that most historians these days still take them as important sources in the argument that Jesus did actually exist, and that's mainly because they sound like they were written then. Events that happen in and around the stories in the Gospels accurately match up with other accounts of goings on in Palestine at the time. And that is a big tick for historians.

[Moderate Historian]

Another big pillar of the Jesus definitely existed camp is actually one we're not totally sold on. Pretty much every historian who argues for the existence of Jesus says a version of this same argument. They say that if Christians were to invent a mythical hero story to center their entire new religion around, why make it so embarrassing? I'll explain. Early Christians were not exactly popular in the first few centuries, especially with those Romans. And here, on the face of it, was their elevator pitch for why everyone should join their holy ranks. So say historians. Why include stories of Jesus's failure to perform some miracles or why he got some prophecies wrong? Why include his moments of bitterness and doubt? Why include fallible apostles who undermine each other for a shot at a higher position in the afterlife and then flee right after Jesus's arrest? Why would they have their golden boy, son of God, highest of the high, left to die like a criminal and picked at by birds? Honourable deaths were, after all, a pretty big deal at the time.

[Skeptical Historian]

So many reasons. Am I going to edge myself or am I going to blow my load? Now I'll edge. So, embarrassing as that all may seem, it is demonstrably a great story that had been told several times before by lots of other religious sects. It is the most widely shared story of all time. So it's not impossible to imagine that Christians made their Messiah human on purpose. It's actually the whole point. You can have an infallible God. They already do. He's up there. The whole point of Jesus being literally the Son of Man is that he's fallible, just like you and me. And his apostles are fallible, just like you and me. It's this connection between us and the Almighty. Like, I am the vine, you are the branches. Like, it's to bring him down to our level. So there is a perfectly good reason for making Jesus imperfect. That's why he's there.

[Mood.com Advertiser]

Yeah.

[Moderate Historian]

And I also feel like for the crucifixion to be in any way emotional, to be in any way powerful, he has to be akin to man. Otherwise, if it's just a God getting crucified, then who cares? Like, he could just be like, ah, I can't feel anything. Do you know what I mean? It's like, it has to be. He has to be of us as well as the divine for him to

[Skeptical Historian]

matter and everybody doubts their faith so

[Moderate Historian]

that it's actually a very sophisticated way to write a narrative. It would be so easy to be like he's the perfect man, he can't do anything wrong and he's super divine and like everything he says is like perfectly true and correct all of the time. It is a far more sophisticated story to tell it in this way.

[Skeptical Historian]

Quite.

[Moderate Historian]

And I think, yeah, that's why it's whether you believe it or not, it's why it's so enduring.

[Mood.com Advertiser]

Let's be honest, Buying cannabis shouldn't be complicated, sketchy or low quality. That's why I want to tell you about Mood.com that's M-O-Ood.com Mood ships federally legal cannabis straight to your door. No medical card, no hassle. And here's the kicker. The quality is better than anything you'll find at your local dispensary. Yeah, I said it. Whether you're into edibles, concentrates, flower, or just looking to explore, you'll find it all at Mood. And it's not just the variety that makes them stand out. Every product is sourced from small American owned family farms that care deeply about what they grow. It's cannabis you can trust, delivered discreetly and ready to elevate your mood. And because you're a listener, you get 20% off your first order. Just head to mood.com that's M-O-Ood.com to get started.

[Mike Bolo]

Tired of juggling sales tools or spending hours on prospecting just to book a few meetings? Meet Apollo, the Go to Market platform

[Bob Garfield]

for finding leads, connecting with buyers and closing deals all in one place. Apollo gives you access to over 210 million contacts and AI that handles all your busy work, finding leads, drafting emails, and even prioritizing your day. So stop paying for five different sales tools when one does it all. Visit Apollo I.O. and sign up free today.

[Mike Bolo]

Tired of juggling sales tools or spending hours on prospecting just to book a few meetings? Meet Apollo, the go to market platform

[Bob Garfield]

for finding leads, connecting with buyers and closing deals all in one place. Apollo gives you access to over 210 million contacts and AI that handles all your busy work, finding leads, drafting emails and even prioritizing your day. So stop paying for five different sales tools when one does it all. Visit Apollo I.O. and sign up free today.

[Mood.com Advertiser]

Let's be honest, buying cannabis shouldn't be complicated, sketchy or low quality. That's why I want to tell you about Mood.com that's M-O-Ood.com Mood ships federally legal cannabis straight to your door. No medical card, no hassle. And here's the kicker. The quality is better than anything you'll find at your local dispensary. Yeah, I said it. Whether you're into edibles, concentrates, flower, or just looking to explore, you'll find it all at Mood. And it's not just the variety that makes them stand out. Every product is sourced from small American owned family farms that care deeply about what they grow. It's cannabis you can trust, delivered discreetly and ready to elevate your mood. And because you're a listener, you get 20% off your first order. Just head to mood.com that's mood.com to get started.

[Skeptical Historian]

But apparently that is not the take that most historians take. The argument seems to be that from the Bible there is good enough ish historical context for the existence of Jesus and he's an unlikely hero who doesn't sound perfect enough to be made up. But even if we did a align with that argument, it's not enough on its own. What we really need is evidence from people who had no vested interest in spreading the story of Christ. And there are a few of them.

[Moderate Historian]

The first non Christian to mention Jesus is Flavius Josephus. He was a Jewish historian writing just after 90 AD. He'd actually been a pretty high ranking general on the side of the Jews in a big bloody war against the Romans. But when the Jews were forced to surrender, Josephus had a trick up his sleeve. When he came before the head of the Roman forces, he made a prophecy and what you know, that Roman general was destined to become the Emperor of Rome. Liking this new prophecy very much, the general spared Josephus life. The point is, by the time Josephus became a historian of the Roman Empire, he had two trying to stay in favour with the Romans and trying to explain and defend the Jewish people to a Roman audience that was already bitterly prejudiced against them. For both reasons, Josephus really had nothing to gain by playing the Jesus story.

[Skeptical Historian]

So what did he actually have to say? Well, in all of his writings he mentions Jesus but twice, and it's quite nice about him. Having said that, we know that one mention was later tinkered with and zhuzhed up by early Christian scholars to make Jesus more glitzy and powerful. But historians mostly think it has some validity. Still, the Corbett believed to have been written by Josephus goes like about this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, he was a doer of startling deeds and was a preacher of people who received the truth with pleasure. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks due to an accusation made by the leading men among the Jews. Pilate had condemned him to be crucified. And those who had in the first place come to love him did not give up their affection for him. Part of the reason historians think this first mention is a legitimate one is because the second reference is actually very run of the mill. It refers back to Jesus in a way that suggests he'd been mentioned before. And it doesn't really add that much, just mentioning James, the brother of Jesus, Jesus, the so called Christ.

[Moderate Historian]

The other big important reference to JC comes from Tacitus. Publius Cornelius. Tacitus was a pretty high ranking politician and writer who is today regarded as one of the greatest Roman historians. Writing in about 116 AD, he calls Christianity a mischievous superstition and an abomination. He also details some pretty gruesome punishments on Christians over the years, saying mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt to serve as a nightly illumination when daylight had expired. So Tacitus and his fellow Romans were not big fans of Christianity. But he does say that Christians got their name from Christus who was executed at the hands of Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius. And that matches up with the story in the Gospels. Pilate was the Roman prefect in charge of Judea at the time Jesus is said to have died. And Tiberius was also the Roman emperor at that same time.

[Skeptical Historian]

But Christ wasn't his surname. Christ means the anointed one. It's not, it's not even like of Nazareth, it's a completely different word. But there they are, two big mentions, Josephus and Tacitus. There are more scattered ones. The Stoic philosopher Marabar Serapion, believed to be writing about 80 to 90 AD, asks the question what did the Jews have to gain from executing their wise king? Which is widely believed to refer to Jesus, the King of the Jews. I'll tell you, there is so much in the Old Testament which you know is shared by Judaism and also Islam of this being willing to sacrifice your son to God like Isaac and the goat up the mountain. Like you know, it happens many times in the Old Testament where followers of this Judeo Christian God are expected to prove their loyalty by murdering their sons. It happens over and over again. So I don't think I'm like Well, why would they kill it? It's all the way through the book. All the way through.

[Moderate Historian]

Well, even if you didn't know anything about these religions and you just had that put to you as a concept, the concept in and of itself just speaks to what you said. The ultimate sacrifice right at that time, the killing your own firstborn son. It doesn't feel like a bizarre concept that somebody pulled out of nowhere.

[Skeptical Historian]

No sacrifices, very pagan. And everyone was pagan.

[Moderate Historian]

Yeah. And what do you think everyone was doing before there was Judaism, Christianity and Islam and everything else?

[Skeptical Historian]

Spoilers. We're still doing it.

[Moderate Historian]

Child sacrifice.

[Skeptical Historian]

Anyway, then we've got Pliny, a high ranking Roman who served as a governor in Turkey. He had no love for the Christians either, criticizing them for their pigheaded obstinacy. But he still notes that Christians worshipped their Christ as a God. And then there were the writings of early Jewish rabbis who referred to Jesus as the illegitimate child of Mary and a sorcerer. And all of these mentions were just a few decades in after Jesus supposedly died. And I suppose you could argue, especially for the Roman scholars like Pliny, if they decades later, had an inkling that there had never been a Jesus at all. And all they're trying to do is subjugate these Christians. Why would they not write that if he wasn't real? Surely their attitude would have been you're

[Moderate Historian]

worshipping a fake God and not even that you're worshipping somebody who didn't even exist.

[Skeptical Historian]

Yes.

[Moderate Historian]

So what do the naysayers say? Believers in the Jesus myth theory just say that these mentions are way too late. Most are written decades after Jesus death.

[Skeptical Historian]

All are written decades after Jesus death,

[Moderate Historian]

some up to a century later. That's generations with only written records to go by.

[Skeptical Historian]

And there were written records of basically everything.

[Moderate Historian]

Even Tacitus and Josephus could be repeating the story told to them by Christians. Disbelievers in the historical Jesus figure also point out just how much the Gospels and other early Christian writings contradict each other on pretty important details of Jesus life. But despite all that, we've got some good news. There's a pretty rock solid consensus among most modern historians that Jesus existed. Because at the end of the day, it's just not that hard to believe.

[Skeptical Historian]

History is all about probabilities. In fact, Pontius Pilate himself, one of the most important figures in the entire region at the time, has only a tiny bit more evidence supporting his existence than Jesus's. So it really would be a phenomenal coup to have real archaeological evidence of such a provincial Preacher that lived over 2,000 years ago. Pretty much all of Jesus's followers at the time would have been illiterate. So there wasn't anyone following Jesus around, writing down all of his best quotes and making memes out of them. So if you look at the story of Jesus's life, the only thing we might expect to see would be a record of his execution, references to his followers and notes on his legacy. And we do have those. But I think that can be quite misleading because unfortunately for me, TikTok can smell my Catholicisms and has served me a bunch of people being like, people weird Christian women. Who was one of them that was like, well if the Bible was written by men, then why are the first people to see Jesus after his resurrection all women? I'm like, they didn't write it down. They couldn't fucking write. Babes like, you can't just be like, anyway, she in particular really fucks me off. But it's yes, it is true that many of the people around him would have been illiterate. I don't believe it is as watertight an argument as it is sort of entertained to be because it's not like nobody could read and write at that time. And when they say record of execution, they don't have. I, Pontius Pilate today said Barabbas could go and then I washed my hands of all of it. Blah blah, blah, timestamp that doesn't exist. There is not a written record of Yeshua bar Joseph being crucified. However, there is a reference written almost 100 years later. It's not quite the same as saying we have a record of his execution. So I think we do need to be careful there. But because I think when you hear that, you assume that it's like, you know, Third Reich level data collection being done, which just isn't true. Also you'll hear people say, well, the census when he's born. Where, bitch, where? Anyway, some people consider that a lot of what Jesus said lasted as well. Not word for word, but messages and ideals that were kept and repeated and embellished. Oral history was all anyone could do, that nobody could fucking read and write. I do think it's much more likely that St. Peter had quite a lot more to do with it. Anyway, if you strip away any claims of Jesus importance or his theological significance or his ability to perform miracles, you have a man called Yeshua Bar Joseph. Jesus of Nazareth who lived in Palestine, was born about 1 CE, wandered around Galilee preaching and gained a collection of close followers before being executed. By Pontius Pilate for troublemaking and that I could believe I could. What I take issue with is people saying that there is written historical evidence that that definitely happened because they're justice in it.

[Mike Bolo]

Tired of juggling sales tools or spending hours on prospecting just to book a few meetings? Meet Apollo, the go to market platform

[Bob Garfield]

for finding leads, connecting with buyers, and closing deals all all in one place. Apollo gives you access to over 210 million contacts and AI that handles all your busy work finding leads, drafting emails, and even prioritizing your day. So stop paying for five different sales tools when one does it all. Visit Apollo I.O. and sign up free today.

[Cool Stuff Daily Host]

Every day the world gets a little weirder and a lot more awesome. Cool Stuff Daily takes a look at every everything from mining in space to the latest in the fight against cancer to how AI is basically changing everything. It's all the cool stuff you didn't know you needed to know. Join us for Cool Stuff Daily as we take a quick look at science tech and the Wait, what stories that make you sound way smarter at dinner. Subscribe to Cool Stuff Daily now because the future's happening fast and it's way too fun to miss.

[Moderate Historian]

So while we're at it, which historical figures do we have good evidence for? Well, let's run down a quick scale. Up top, we have Julius Caesar and he gets a solid 9.9 on the existometer. Like we said, we can't be totally sure of anything, but Julius Caesar is as close as you get. He wrote texts himself. He's immortalized in coins, statues and inscriptions. And there are a crazy number of sources that knew him personally writing at the time. It's probably relevant to mention Muhammad here too. Muslims believe the Quran was revealed to Muhammad in about 600 AD and compiled very soon after his death. So Muhammad is a pretty safe bet too. He. He has multiple biographies and collections of his sayings compiled by people who say that they met him. And on top of that, there are plenty of non Muslim references too. Multiple Christian sources talk about a new Arab prophet and a rising political movement tied to him. And very unlike Jesus, there's plenty of physical evidence of Muhammad's life too, including inscriptions, references on coins, et cetera. So no, we're not going to do a shorthand on whether Muhammad existed. Please, for the love of God, I would never dare. Don't.

[Skeptical Historian]

That's what I mean. On the lower end of the scale we have ancient Greek figures like Socrates and Homer. Socrates never wrote anything down himself, but because of references by his followers and his pupils. He certainly is believed to have been a real person. Homer, though, author of the Iliad and the Odyssey, depending on who you ask. Jury's out. Scholars genuinely have no idea whether Homer was a single writer or just a collective name for a long tradition of bards. I don't care either way. Like, no one's. No one's crusading over Homer, you know, I don't think it's as, like, as important. I also think it's like, key to note that people living under Roman occupation in and around the time of Jesus were subjugated. And you can see everywhere, all over the world, religions that pop up as resistance. And I don't think that makes it any more or less legitimate than if he really was, if he really did exist and walk on water like it's the same.

[Moderate Historian]

Absolutely. It was all just. If you strip it back to what it is, it was just tribal. Right. It's like an act of resistance. And then it becomes Christians versus Muslims. The Crusades.

[Skeptical Historian]

Christians versing themselves. Yeah.

[Moderate Historian]

Versus, you know, the Islamic colonization. They're fighting each other. It's like if you stripped away the religion and the man that they were following, whether he's divine or not, it's just tribal. Mm.

[Skeptical Historian]

And what about Boudicca or Spartacus? Only a few texts mention them, and they were all written decades later. Their stories are dramatic and obviously play into grand narratives of conquest. So compared to them, you could argue that the evidence Jesus existed is stronger. And then you can look at things like, King Arthur. We've done him before, but when it comes to the existometer, he is a strong zero.

[Moderate Historian]

Ah. I found a hike where you can go to where he did some of his magic things, because I'm going to Wales over Easter and I'm gonna go look at it. I'm gonna go check it out.

[Skeptical Historian]

Why not?

[Moderate Historian]

Why not? I want to believe,

[Skeptical Historian]

apparently Arthur is supposed to have lived around 500 AD, but all the historical sources for events of that time don't mention him at all. Despite him being the literal king of England, he is first referred to three or four hundred years after he is supposed to have lived.

[Moderate Historian]

So, yes, these days, the idea that Jesus never existed has lost quite a bit of steam. It's considered actually to be a pretty fringe theory. Brian McCain, an archaeologist and history professor at Florida Atlantic University, says the. I can think of no other example who fits into their time and place so well, but people say doesn't exist. Eric Myers, an archaeologist and emeritus professor in Judaic studies at Duke University says, I don't know any mainstream scholar who doubts the historicity of Jesus. Myers likens the Jesus myth theory to climate change denial.

[Skeptical Historian]

Well, he can meet me outside. We do not know whether Jesus healed the sick, raised Lazarus from the dead, walked on water, fed the 5,000, slayed any dragons. But most historians are fairly certain that Jesus of Nazareth, a man, a carpenter, did exist. It is quite rare that we get such a definitive answer to a question in a shorthand title. So it's a win. So why do I feel so empty?

[Moderate Historian]

Happy Easter.

[Skeptical Historian]

Which fun fact I learned because there was a blood moon. The reason Easter moves every year, obviously it has to be Good Friday and then Easter Sunday. That makes sense. But it's because Good Friday can never fall on a full moon with the potential of an eclipse. Because if there is a blood moon on Good Friday, I see it's all game over. So the church quite helpfully moves it around every year so we never have to deal with that eventuality.

[Moderate Historian]

So much admin. And another fun fact for you guys, this episode, if you're listening to it, on the day of release, is going out on the 31st of March. It is the Tuesday before Easter weekend and it's actually called Holy Tuesday or Fig Tuesday. I've never ever heard the words Fig Tuesday before. And it's called that because apparently that's when Jesus cursed the fig tree. I don't know what that's about either.

[Skeptical Historian]

It's one of his lesser miracles. It gets skated over.

[Moderate Historian]

Sure, sure, sure. There's so many other greatest hits there to cover.

[Skeptical Historian]

Well, I mean, it is basically just a tantrum, so it's a bit of an embarrassing one.

[Moderate Historian]

He's just a human after all.

[Skeptical Historian]

That's the point.

[Moderate Historian]

Exactly. So that's it, guys. Have a beautiful Easter. I'm gonna spend it in Wales looking for King Arthur.

[Skeptical Historian]

The mass has ended. Go forth in peace.

[Moderate Historian]

Absolutely. Goodbye.

[Mike Bolo]

Tired of juggling sales tools or spending hours on prospecting just to book a few meetings? Meet Apollo, the go to market platform

[Bob Garfield]

for finding leads, connecting with buyers and closing deals all in one place. Apollo gives you access to over 210 million contacts and AI that handles all your busy work, finding leads, drafting emails and even prioritizing your day. So stop paying for five different sales tools when one does it all. Visit Apollo I.O. and sign up free today. This is Mike Bolo of Lexicon Valley

[Mike Bolo]

and I'm Bob Garfield. Are you one of those people who sometimes uses words? Do you communicate or acquire information with, you know, language?

[Mood.com Advertiser]

Hey, us too.

[Mike Bolo]

So join us on Lexicon Valley to chew over the history, culture and many mysteries of English, plus some lice cracks.

[Bob Garfield]

Find us on one of those apps where people listen to podcasts.

[Mike Bolo]

Tired of juggling sales tools or spending hours on prospecting just to book a few meetings? Meet Apollo, the Go to Market platform

[Bob Garfield]

for finding leads, connecting with buyers, and closing deals all in one place. Apollo gives you access to over 210 million contacts and AI that handles all your busywork, finding leads, drafting emails, and even prioritizing your day. So stop paying for five different sales tools when one does it all. Visit Apollo I.O. and sign up free today.