← Renewing Your Mind
Renewing Your Mind
Incommunicable Attributes
00:26:26
As mutable creatures, we are always changing. But God is forever the same. Today, R.C. Sproul studies the unique attributes of God that we do not share, characteristics that spur us to worship the Lord in all His holiness and glory. Receive R.C....
Loading summary
Transcript4 lines
- [00:00]
A
We are dependent beings. We are created beings. But God is not dependent, not created, not finite, but he has the power of being in and of Himself. He doesn't derive it from something else.
- [00:24]
B
To know who God is, we must study his attributes. He shares some of his attributes with us, like his love, goodness, and kindness, and we call those his communicable attributes. But today, on this Monday edition of Renewing youg Mind, RC Sproul will focus on those attributes that God alone possesses. This week you'll be hearing messages from Dr. Sproul's foundation series, a series designed to give you a solid foundation for your beliefs. Over 60 messages, it gives you an overview of theology to help you know what you believe and why you believe it. You can request this series in a special edition DVD set, along with digital access to the messages and study guide. Plus, for those who'd prefer to read this overview of theology, we'll send you his book, Everyone's a Theologian. Simply give a donation of any amount@renewingyourmind.org well, to start this week's study, here's Dr. Sproul on the incommunicable attributes of God.
- [01:29]
A
Sometimes when I go into a store and want to make a purchase or into the bank and want to cash a check, people will request some form of identification. And I usually open up my wallet and show them my picture on my Florida driver's license. And on the side of that license, it tells what color my eyes are, what color my hair is, and all that sort of thing, how old I am. In other words, what is being done here in trying to identify me as a person is that a list of particular characteristics or traits are listed there. And we call these characteristics or traits or idiosyncrasies that define a human being their attributes. Now, when we study the doctrine of God, one of the most important things we're concerned with is an understanding of his attributes. And so we seek to look at the specific characteristics of God, such as his holiness, his immutability, his infinity, and so on, all these different things that we say about God in order to gain a coherent understanding of who he is. Now, at the beginning of such an endeavor, we recognize a couple of important things. One distinction that is made in theology with respect to the nature of God is the distinction between the communicable and the incommunicable attributes of God. On Atlanta, Georgia, we have a communicable disease center, where the focus of attention there is to study those diseases that are easily transmitted from one person to another. That we might say are contagious. And when we talk about that which is communicable, we mean that which is able to be transferred from one to another. Now, in our next session, we will look at some of the communicable attributes of God. That refers to those attributes that God possesses that we to some degree can possess as well. But today we're going to look at the incommunicable attributes in brief. And this term, incommunicable attributes, defines those attributes of God that cannot be transferred to a creature. I mean, even God cannot communicate these characteristics of his own being to those things that he made in simple terms. We ask the question frequently, is it possible for God to create another God? Well, of course not, unless we change the definition of the term God. Because the problem God would have in creating another God is that the creaturely God by definition would be created, would be a creature, and not independent, not eternal, not immutable. He would lack the necessary attributes that describe God. So there are certain attributes that even God couldn't transfer from himself to a creature. Now, a second introductory idea that we have to have, besides this distinction between the incommunicable and communicable attributes of God, is the important principle of understanding that God is a simple being. Not simple to understand, not simple in the sense of being simplistic or easy. But what is meant by that is that God is not made up of parts. I have distinctive body parts, toes and feet and legs and the knee bone connected to the ankle bone and all of that. And we can talk about my liver and my pancreas and kidneys and heart and lungs and so on. And I'm made up of so many parts of bone and so much flesh, all of this put together makes me a single creature made up of distinctive parts. But God is a simple being in the sense that he is not a complex being made up of five pounds of immutability, five pounds of eternality, five pounds of infinity, five pounds of sovereignty, and so on. There's not a little bit of this and a little bit of that all mixed together or built together like we would construct a house. But rather, we say in theology it's not so much that God has attributes as that he is his attributes and that he has his attributes, or he is his attributes in an undivided, simple way. Now, again, what are the practical ramifications of that? Well, we might say that, for example, that God is holy. And we might also say that God is just. And we might also say that he is immutable. And we might also say that he is omnipotent. But here's what that means. That his omnipotence is always a holy omnipotence, an immutable omnipotence, an eternal omnipotence, and an infinite omnipotence. That is, all of the other character traits that we use to describe God also would define what we mean by his omnipotence. And by the same token, God's eternality is an omnipotent eternality. And his holiness is an all powerful omnipotent holiness. Do you see what I mean? That it's not like he's made up of one square of omnipotence, another square of holiness. He is altogether holy, altogether omnipotent, altogether immutable. He is his attributes. Yet nevertheless, we make this distinction between the incommunicable and the communicable attributes. Now, some people don't even think that this is a very helpful distinction and tend to shy away from it. But I think it's very important because one of the most critical things we can do as Christians is to come to a clear understanding about the difference between God and. And any creature, and no creature can ever possess an incommunicable attribute of Almighty God. I was talking about some problems that some folks were having in relationships the other day. And the gentleman I was talking with looked at me and he says, well, you know what we have here? And I said, what's that? He says, well, we got a bean problem. I knew what he meant. He was speaking in colloquial manner when he said we have a bean problem. Most people would think, you know, green beans, lime of beans, whatever. But he was simply saying what we have human being problem. He said, well, this is a problem with. This is problems that human beings have with each other because we're a fallen race of people. And that's what he meant by a being problem. He was making a play on the word human being. Now, when we talk about the difference between God and creatures, the most common distinction we make is that we are human beings and God is called the Supreme Being. This is our common way of speaking. God is the Supreme Being. We are human beings. Now what we're getting at here is the idea that there must be something I have in common with everything else that exists. I am. Roger is this piece of chalk is God is so that we all are to some extent beings. And yet there's something special about God with respect to his being. Now when we think of this and we look, we see a common idea here of being and the difference in the qualifying adjectives that describe the being. You would think that the real difference between God and man would be out here. But in reality, the real difference between God and everything that is made is this right here, as I was indicating earlier. We stand out of being. We're derived beings, we are conditional beings, we are dependent beings. We are, we are created beings. But God is not dependent, not created, not finite. But he has the power of being in and of Himself. He doesn't derive it from something else. I mean, we say in God we live and move and have our being. God doesn't say, in man I live and move and have my being. He got along without us before he met us, he can get along without us now. He never needed us to survive or to be. And yet we cannot survive for an instant without the power of His Being upholding our being. Because the idea here is that when God creates us, not only does he create us, and by virtue of His Being, the maker of who we are means that we are dependent upon him for our very existence from the beginning. But the idea biblically is that what God creates, he sustains, he preserves. And I am as dependent upon God for my moment to moment being, for my continuing to exist as I was for my original existence. And again, this is the supreme difference between God and us, in that God has no such dependence upon anything outside of Himself. Now I've mentioned already Bertrand RTZL's insight that he had when he was in his late teenage years when he read an essay from John Stuart Mill in which Mill argued against the classical cosmological argument for the existence of God, in which the thinkers reasoned this every effect must have a cause. And we would reason back from effects that we see now back to the ultimate cause, who was God? And Bertram Russell said when he was growing up, he was very much persuaded by that rational argument until he read this essay by Mill in which Mill said, well, if everything has to have a cause, then obviously God has to have a cause. And so when we get back to God, you can't stop there. You got to keep asking the question, who caused God? And this was an epiphany for Bertrand Russell. He uses it in his book why I'm Not a Christian. And for the rest of his life he rejected the existence of God on the basis of this insight from John Stuart Mill, which involved a false understanding of the law of causality. The law of cause and effect says that every effect must have a cause, not that everything that is must have a cause. The only thing that requires a cause is an effect. And it requires one by definition, because that's what an effect is, something that is caused by something else. And so the question is, does God require a cause? Not if he has his being in and of himself. Not if he is eternal and self existent. Again, there were two little boys having a discussion. And one little boy said to the other little boy, where'd that tree come from? The other boy said, God made that tree. Oh, well, where did that lake come from? God made the lake. Where did those flowers come from? God made those flowers. Well, where did you come from? God made me. All right, where did God come from? And the little boy said, God made himself. And that's supposed to be profound, but it's profoundly wrong because even God cannot make himself. For God to make himself, God would have to be before he was. And he can't do that. So it's not that God is self created. That's what we don't want to say about God. Nothing can create itself. God is not self created. God is self created, existent. This gets us, I think, to the most amazing and profound element or aspect or attribute of God himself. My favorite attribute in God, if I can have one, is found in the Word. I mean, I realize that the vast majority of people who have not studied theology at a technical level have probably never in their lives heard that word before. Aseity. And this is where I think, you know, I just feel so fortunate to have had the opportunity to spend so many years studying theology and see the benefits therein. But when I see that word, I have chills go up and down my spine. I mean, just seeing that word communicates to me something about the character of God that makes me want to fall on my face right now in a posture of awe and reverence and adoration. Because the aseity of God refers to having his existence in and of himself. This is what defines the supremacy of the Supreme Being, that God is not a creature. And this is unimaginable. It's unimaginable. If you choke off my oxygen supply for a few minutes, I die. If you take away water for a few days, I die. You take away food for a few more days, I die. Or give me a disease that can kill me quickly. Our lives are fragile and susceptible to all kinds of dreadful things that can destroy them. God can't die. There's nothing that he's dependent upon for his being. This is what I meant earlier when I said he has the very power of being in and of himself. The very thing we don't have. That's why we're so fragile, that's why we're so frightened. Because as human beings we are creaturely beings, we're dependent beings and we wish we had the power to keep ourselves alive forever, but we don't. But God has that power of his own being and the power of any other being in of himself. That's what Paul says. In him we live and move and have our being and God alone has aseity. God and God alone has self existence, the power to be eternally on himself. So let me just say very quickly, I think that reason alone compellingly demands that there be such a being who possesses this or nothing could possibly exist in this world. If anything exists now, that tells us that there never could have been a time when nothing existed. Because if there ever was a time when there was absolutely nothing, then what could be now? Nothing. Let's not talk about a universe that came into being 17 billion years ago. Unless you're going to talk in terms of the nonsense of self creation. Because nothing can create itself. And if there ever was a time that there was nothing, if it were 17 billion years and six months ago there was nothing, what would there be now? Nothing. What could there possibly be now? Nothing. The point is there is something. And if anything exists now at all, this piece of chalk, my shoe, this room in which we are, then that means that somewhere, somehow something must have the power of being independently. There always had to be being or nothing could possibly be. That's what I'm saying. This piece of chalk screams of the aseity of God. And you won't find that aseity in the chalk and you won't find it in me. These are things that are not communicable. Just like God cannot communicate his eternality to a creature, because anything that has a beginning in time is by definition not eternal. We can be given eternal life going on forever in that direction. But we can't get it retroactively because we all have birth dates and we are not eternal creatures. Eternality as such is an incommunicable attribute. Immutability goes with aseity, because God is eternally what he is and who he is. This is the basis of his being incapable of mutation. We as creatures who are made in space and time are mutable creatures. We are not immutable creatures and we are finite creatures. We are not infinite creatures. God could not create another infinite being because there may be many infinite lines, and so on. There can be only one infinite being. It's a contradiction in terms to talk in terms of two infinite beings if we're talking about being, being infinite. And so we see how these attributes of God point to the way in which God is other from us, the way in which he is different from us, and the way in which he transcends us, and the way in which he is greater than we, and why we owe him glory and honor and praise for his greatness. You know, we cheer the Michael Jordans of this world. We stand up and give all kinds of accolades to people who excel for a moment and then are heard no more. And yet the one who has the very power of being in and of himself and eternally, to whom every one of us is absolutely dependent and should owe our everlasting gratitude for every breath of air that we take in this world, doesn't receive the honor and glory from his creatures that he so richly deserves. The one who is supreme deserves the obedience and the worship of those whom he has made.
- [24:13]
B
Studying the attributes of God should cause us to worship Him. He is mighty and supreme and worthy of all honor. And as we continue hearing from R.C. sproul's series on systematic Theology this week, you'll hear more and more of God's greatness. Thank you for joining us for this Monday edition of Renewing youg Mind. I'm your host, Nathan W. Bingham. If you'd like to own this 60 part series yourself, we'd love to send you a special edition DVD set and unlock the series and study guide for you in the free Ligonier app. You can request this week's resource offer when you call us at 800-435-4343 with a donation of any amount or when you use the link in the podcast Show Notes along with access to RC Sproul's series foundations, we'll send you a copy of Everyone's a Theologian short chapter by short chapter. Dr. Sproul will walk you through an understanding of systematic theology, and it's been compiled in such a way that you could use this as a daily read to help you think God's thoughts after him as you move through the year. Give your donation at renewingyourmind.org or by calling us at 800-435-4343 and we'll get this book and DVD set in the mail for you. And thank you for helping take the truth of who God Is to the nations. R.C. sproul introduced us to God's Incommunicable attributes today, while tomorrow he'll focus on God's communicable attributes, those aspects of his character that he shares with us as believers. That's Tuesday here on Renewing youg Mind.