Adam Grant (2:55)

We need to just record our calls.

Esther Perel (2:56)

We should record our calls.

Adam Grant (2:57)

That's the takeaway. So I want to. I want to talk to you about relationships today. I'm so intrigued by your concept of unofficial resumes, and I thought that would be a fun place to start. So we all know what the official resume is. What's the unofficial resume?

Esther Perel (3:14)

So there are two parts in my mind to the unofficial resume. One is the many different things that you have done and experienced in your life that are not specific about your work history, but that have actually shaped who you are. And then the one that I am most interested in at this moment is your relationship history. To what extent does the way that you were socialized, the norms and the roles and the values that you were inculcated, how do they translate from family, community, religious institutions into your work life? Because that is never on the resume. You can see where the person worked, what they did, all the tasks, but you actually have no idea from what you read or what they tell you what it's like to work with them.

Adam Grant (4:02)

So I love this concept. And it's a bit of a stretch for us in organizational psychology because normally we think about past relationships mostly in terms of prior jobs. So we know that people tend to imprint on their first boss, and then they assume that other leaders are going to be like them. And so if they were lucky to have a really caring leader, then, you know, they carry positive assumptions into their future jobs. If they had an abusive boss, watch out. They tend to assume that future workplaces are going to be hostile. But you want to take us both broader and farther back in people's histories, don't you?

Esther Perel (4:34)

Yes. Yes. Because you're just emphasizing which boss you had. I am looking at what was the relationship between you and this boss, not just because of who the boss is, but also because of who you are. And then what sauce did you cook together? And that leads me. There's a question I like to ask a lot. You know, it's just an opening door. It's not like everything resides there. But I often will ask people, were you raised primarily for autonomy and self reliance, or would you say that you were raised more for loyalty and interdependence? Raised for autonomy and self reliance? It's sometimes in the circumstances of one's life that you were just left to your own devices, but you have a message in your head. I've got my own legs to stand on. I have to be the one to do it. Nobody can do it as well as me. When you have a problem, start thinking, what can I do? And baked in that is also. How did you deal with authority? Did you learn to challenge it? Did you learn to succumb to it? Did you learn to be obedient, compliant? Did you fight it all the time? Did you trust it? Did you distrust it? Did you think it was an authority that betrayed you? And that can be parents or parental figures. It can be teachers, coaches. It's not just the nuclear family. It really goes much further. And if you raised for loyalty and interdependence yourself is embedded in a network of connections, it's not your own two feet. My problem is everybody else's problem too. And my happiness. My decisions are measured by how they affect others, not just what's good for me. This kind of worldviews, they really are more than just their weltanschaunts, as they used to call it in German, really travel with you. They travel with you to work. And when you have had a bad relationship with a manager or a boss, it's not just because the boss was acting a certain way. It's also because of how you interpreted and how you responded to what the boss was doing. The same boss can often be liked by some and totally disliked by others. Because a relationship is not just one person's personality. It's the dance between two personalities.

Adam Grant (6:52)

So we have sort of a template then that we walk into our jobs with. So let's take my, I guess my upbringing as an example. I think I was raised primarily for autonomy and self reliance, but have come to value some degree of loyalty and helpfulness over time.

Esther Perel (7:14)

You wrote a whole book about it.

Adam Grant (7:16)

I did. So what does that mean for how you would expect me to approach my professional interactions?

Esther Perel (7:23)

It's not a deterministic view. It doesn't say you got this messaging or you were raised this way, therefore you are that way. It's this is the thing that influenced you more. And from that place, some people will say, this suits me. This is my view and this is how I live in the world. Other people say, I have missed that other side for so long. Other people say, I learned over time that this approach had its limits. It may be a default setting, but I need to expand on it because these two approaches are not exclusive of each other. They are actually themselves interdependent.

Adam Grant (8:00)

Yes. Okay, that Was the next question then, which is, what do you do when you want both of these things? So I want to have meaningful connections with others. I also value my own autonomy. And sometimes those goals are in tension, and other times they're not.

Esther Perel (8:15)

That tension is not sometimes there. It is always there. Actually, it is inherent, sometimes higher and lower, but it is essential to relationships. And it is a constant negotiation and a constant balancing. It's not something that you resolve to make go away. It's actually, if you enter the world of relationships, this is going to be one of your primary tasks. For some of us, it's high tension and it's really complicated. I constantly comply. I'm a pleaser. I succumb. I don't really hold on to my own views. And for others, I'm rigid. So you have compliable and then you have rigid. Some people need to become more pliable, and some people actually could use solidification. But, you know, I asked a question earlier this morning. I said to the people around me, I said, what would you say are some of the messages that you received that you think went with you to work? So one of the people was saying, when you start something, you end it. It's just a one liner, but you know that in that one liner is an entire way of acting and responding to one's obligations. And another person said, integrity. And then I said, a central message for me actually was don't just listen to what people say. Watch how they act. And I think when you ask it like that, most people have an immediate answer. They have a. If you say, if there's a cartoon above your head, what would it say in the balloon? You know, they have their line, they know their unofficial resume relationally. What would you say, Adam?

Adam Grant (9:48)

Well, okay, ask me. What's the question?

Esther Perel (9:50)

Yes, you began by saying, I was raised with autonomy. And then I came to understand the importance of. Of what? Relying on others, asking for help, letting myself be influenced by others. What is the transition?

Adam Grant (10:05)

Well, for me, the core value is helping others. And so it was. I think it was a realization that if I thought about autonomy as independence, then I wouldn't be able to show up for the people who mattered to me, and my contributions would be limited.

Esther Perel (10:19)

On the other end, helping others is a form of never needing, then guilty as charged. It actually reinforced the autonomy.

Adam Grant (10:29)

So I hate needing people.

Esther Perel (10:31)

Okay, so that's the thing. But I think one of the things you say you learned is you learned the interdependence a little bit more. You realized that there was Something that you needed to soften. That has to do not with helping them, but with letting them either help you, advise you, intermingle with you.

Wise Ad Host (10:49)

Fair?

Esther Perel (10:50)

Is that accurate?

Adam Grant (10:51)

Yes. That happened.

Esther Perel (10:52)

Okay. Because helping others is actually an expression of autonomy that says you need me, but I never need you.

Adam Grant (11:00)

Wait, what are you trying to accuse me of, Esther?

Esther Perel (11:03)

It's a descriptive, not an accusation.

Adam Grant (11:06)

It's definitely a valid analysis, I will say, because I have been accused in the past of having unbalanced relationships where people will say to me, you're always helping me and you never let me help you back. And my excuse for a long time was, you know, I didn't become a professor to get help from students. Right. This is a relationship where there's a mentor and a mentee. And I've really had to rethink that over time because I learned so much from my students and they want to feel that they have value to add. And by making that one sided, I was actually limiting the relationship.

Esther Perel (11:41)

Couldn't agree more, couldn't agree more. And so now the next question is, do you see the value of adding this perspective into the workplace? Right. I mean, you're an organizational psychologist. I'm a clinician. To me, the reason I began to think about that is because I think that relational skills have changed. Meaning in the workplace. They always used to be soft skills. You kind of disregarded them. They were often seen as feminine skills. And I think that the research, especially with the rise of AI and everything around us, there is a sense that actually relational skills often the bottom line, and actually we don't call them skills anymore. It's relational intelligence because it's systemic. It's not just knowing how to talk and communicate and all. It's understanding the relational system inside companies. That's how I began to think about it. I thought, you know, there's something to bring to companies by bringing this relational way of thinking. So do you think that is valid too?

Adam Grant (12:40)

Whose show do you think this is? I was going to ask you that question. No, it's. It's actually really interesting. As I was listening to even your description of relationship resume, it never occurred to me to talk about kind of my childhood as part of what it's like to work with me. And yet it's such useful information.

Esther Perel (12:59)

Do you micromanage?

Adam Grant (13:01)

No, because I don't like holding other people accountable. I want them to be responsible.

Esther Perel (13:06)

You have a real system in place. Yes, yes, yes. You want them to be as autonomous as you.

Adam Grant (13:12)

Correct.

Esther Perel (13:12)

You want them to be as self Reliant as you.

Adam Grant (13:14)

The ideal collaboration is one where we're both totally independent.

Esther Perel (13:18)

Do you hear the contradiction in terms?

Adam Grant (13:21)

Yes, of course I do. That's the. That's the joy of it, isn't it? But you're right. I. I've worked really well. When I think about the students that I mentored, for example, I. I've been most successful when they're very independent and proactive, and I have struggled and consistently failed when they have a sort of a more deferential.

Esther Perel (13:41)

Deferential, yes, tell me what to do. Yes, give me the guidelines, et cetera. Now, that tells you which students you may want to work with and which ones should go to somebody else.

Adam Grant (13:52)

Correct.

Esther Perel (13:53)

And who you should hire to work with and who should be working with someone else. I think this is extremely useful information because too many bad matches are being made. It's about this. This is a very important dimension. A good collaboration is two independent people. It says a lot. Help, of course, is in micromanaging, is in how you communicate what you want to be done. You know, the amount of people who tell their bosses, you don't tell me clearly what you expect. You expect me to know what you want without having to spill it out because it's so obvious to you. I mean, you can see the scripts, and each one of these scripts refers back to a particular relational dimension which refers back to a particular type of socialization.

Adam Grant (14:37)

Yeah, I see. This is going to be therapy, which I clearly needed. I. I've had a hard time saying no to those students because it conflicts with my identity and value system around being helpful and I don't want to turn them away. And I end up then being unhelpful to them. And I realize after the fact, yeah, I should have encouraged them to go to somebody else who's a better match for what they're looking for.

Esther Perel (15:03)

It's interesting because I'm thinking about me as a therapist. You know, there are many times when I just say I don't think I'm the right person. And at first, people don't like it. It's not a nice thing to say, like, is there something with me? No, it's because there is something in the way that I think would work better with you. For me, it often has to do with pacing. Not everybody can go at the speed that I am accustomed to go. And for some people, it's just so welcome because I don't spend 20 minutes listening, not saying a thing. And for other people, this is not what suits them. So that's One distinction. Another distinction is that people tend to choose the manager, the mentor, the therapist who often strengthens their defense system or their default system when in fact what they need is a person from the other side. So don't worry too much about saying no. I think this matching thing is really useful, especially when you think who is going to work on what project with whom. People are constantly thinking skills and tools rather than also styles. Relational styles. Yes.

Adam Grant (16:10)

It's funny because this is exactly why you are such a great foil for me is like my, my instinct is to pair up with people who are also very cognitive and your emotional orientation always pushes me in new directions.

Esther Perel (16:26)

So we've, we've had that conversation.

Adam Grant (16:29)

We have had that debate in many flavors.

Esther Perel (16:31)

But I appreciate it and same for you. You tell me where's the research? You tell me. Give me. No, no. It's really. It's a very good counterparts. Well, yes, go ahead. Next question.

Adam Grant (16:42)

So I think that since you want

Esther Perel (16:44)

to turn it around.

Adam Grant (16:45)

I do, I do. So I'm thinking about this idea of complementarity and of course I'm immediately thinking about some relevant studies. There's a great paper that Chad Hartnell led showing that if you have a task oriented culture and you hire a relationship oriented CEO, that leader will add more to the bottom line than if you brought in a task oriented CEO who basically just cloned what was already in the culture.

Esther Perel (17:10)

Correct.

Adam Grant (17:11)

And the reverse is true too that if you have a relationship oriented culture that's more kumbaya. The task oriented CEO adds more value. Yes, but that's not the person we choose. To your point, if we're a task oriented culture, we want the results driven hard charging leader. How do you think about getting people to abandon that preference knowing that the. The compliment may be more valuable but is harder to. It's harder. It's harder to get excited about that person. Sometimes it's like a failed organ transplant when they come in because they seem like such a mismatch.

Esther Perel (17:45)

My first framework, which I'm sure you are familiar with, but it's an old one and I find it so relevant still is high context, low context. Do you know it?

Adam Grant (17:55)

Yep, but not as well as you.

Esther Perel (17:57)

You know, high context. I'm going to just define the term is communication that derives its meanings from the implicit from shared understandings, shared history, nonverbal cues, body language. It is extremely contextual. That is the relational versus the task. Low context society are often task oriented societies. It's actually not just high context, low context. It's Relational versus task. They're more literal. They rely on the words. They go for clarity and efficacy rather than for relationships. So the model of high context, low context applies directly to relational versus task. The question of complementarity is this. What are the pieces that are needed to do this? It needs a combo of relational and task. What is our strength? Task? What do we need to bolster? What is the side of us that we have actually not developed, that we often negate or neglect or diminish? Choose the other one, because the system needs the other one. Even if you don't need it personally and you don't like it, your company does, usually your relationship does, usually your culture does. By definition, most of these complex situations straddle dualities, and they need to integrate them. Complementarity is the ability to integrate the two parts. The opposite of complementarity is polarization, actually.

Adam Grant (19:30)

Oh, that's so interesting.

Esther Perel (19:32)

Because what is difficult for us is to actually bring those two things together. What do we do? Typically in a relationship, I become the relational person, you the task person. In a company, you have them split. In a country, you have them split. In the gender wars, you have them split. And politically, you have them split. And instead of understanding that each actually needs the other, what do we do? I outsource unto you the part of the equation that I don't want to have to deal with. You take care of that. And I don't have to integrate anything. If I was alone, I would have to integrate those two poles, those dualities, all the time. But since we are often not alone, we split. It's called splitting the ambivalence. Because complementarity deals with ambivalence, with opposing forces, opposing needs, opposing sources. When you manage to split it completely and you don't have to deal with micro picture, macro picture spending, saving, hiring, not hiring, whatever the tensions that people have. AI, not AI, remote, not remote. It's this or that. And once you have to do this and that and how we're going to do it, you're in complementarity zone. If it becomes an either or and you become the or that I don't want to have to deal with, then we are in a polarized situation.

Adam Grant (20:55)

Oh, that makes so much sense. This episode is brought to you by Tonal. One of the things that keeps a lot of us from going to the gym is not knowing where to start or if our workouts will even, well, work out. Meet Tonal, the ultimate strength training system that tracks your progress, to take the guesswork out of working out so you can have the confidence to keep pushing forward. Tonal gives you the convenience of a full gym and the guidance of a personal trainer anytime you want, right in your home. It's just one sleek system mounted on your wall. After a quick assessment, Tonal sets the optimal weight for every single move and adjusts in 1 pound increments as you get stronger. So you're always challenged but never overwhelmed. I got a Tonal recently. It was easy to set up and it's surprisingly fun to use. Right now, Tonal is offering our listeners $200 off your Tonal purchase with promo code rethinking, that's Tonal.com and use promo code rethinking for $200 off your purchase. Again, that's Tonal.com, promo code rethinking for $200 Off.

Wise Ad Host (21:59)

This podcast is brought to you by Wise, the app for international people using money around the globe. With the Wise account, you can send, spend and receive in over 40 currencies with no markups and no hidden fees. Whether you're sending pounds across the pond, spending rials in Rio, or getting paid in dollars for your side gig, you'll get the mid market exchange rate on every transaction. Plus most transfers arrive in less than 20 seconds. Join 15 million customers internationally. Be smart, get Wise. Download the Wise app today or visit wise.com Ts and Cs apply.

Adam Grant (22:34)

Hey, it's Adam Grant from Ted's podcast Work Life, and this episode is brought to you by. ServiceNow AI is only as powerful as the platform it's built into. That's why it's no surprise that more than 85% of the Fortune 500 companies use the ServiceNow AI platform. While other platforms duct tape tools together, ServiceNow seamlessly unifies people, data, workflows, and AI connecting every corner of your business. And with AI agents working together autonomously, anyone in any department can focus on the work that matters Most. Learn how ServiceNow puts AI to work for people@servicenow.com. Okay, so this is lighting a bunch of different sparks.

Esther Perel (23:20)

Oh, I want to hear your response, because I'm in the thick of this thing and I love complementarity and couples therapy is filled with it and the opposite of it is polarization.

Adam Grant (23:31)

Yeah, I never thought about that as the opposite, but I think you're right. I think so. First of all, this is, I mean, this is why the idea of of culture ad has become popular instead of just culture fit, right? Because we're looking for somebody who's going to help us Develop what's, what's weak or what's missing.

Esther Perel (23:45)

Yes.

Adam Grant (23:45)

As opposed to just replicate what's already there. I think, though, after listening to you talk about complementarity, AD is not enough because it suggests that we can. We're the task oriented culture. We bring in the relationship oriented person and they're basically in their own silo, managing relationships correct. What we want is culture multiply where they actually have to interact with our culture and there's some kind of dynamic

Esther Perel (24:09)

tension and to let themselves be influenced by each other.

Adam Grant (24:12)

In both directions.

Esther Perel (24:13)

Exactly in both directions.

Adam Grant (24:15)

I think, you know, this is why a lot of mergers and acquisitions fail is you see either two companies come together or one decides to buy another. And the assumption is, wow, this culture is gonna bring something we're missing. But they don't do the integration work and they don't have the hard conversations about, are we actually gonna start over and build a new culture together? Are we gonna try to take elements of each that are successful? Are we gonna have one absorb the other and expect usually the firm that's coming in that has less power to basically adapt and conform. And I think in some cases the misfit or the tension is so profound that leaders realize it's actually better to just do the acquisition and let the two organizations maintain their independence. So I think about, as an example, I think about Amazon buying Zappos and saying, you know what? We realize the Zappos culture is different from the Amazon culture in a lot of ways. We don't want to mess with it, we're just going to let it run autonomously. Or more recently, Microsoft did that with LinkedIn. This makes me curious about how you think about when it's a good idea to do the integration work and when it's a good idea to maintain the separation.

Esther Perel (25:24)

The first thing, just to complete the circle. In the version where you actually create an integration. The integration can only take place if each culture, or each side or each person or each company says, I need that. That saying I need that is the invitation to interdependence versus separateness. So that's the first thing. However, I would probably say I'm more aware of when it's necessary than when people want it. It's necessary. When you see people who absolutely do not want to be influenced, it's the rigidity that tells you it's needed.

Adam Grant (26:05)

So they're the ones who need it most. They're also the most resistant to it.

Esther Perel (26:09)

Exactly. As always, when you're forced, you know you need it. But you're not as open to it and as creative to doing it. When it's voluntary, there is less pressure, you're more creative, but there's less motivation, there's less incentive to do it. So then the question becomes, does it have to come from the bottom up or does it have to come from top down? I think my sense is it needs to come from the top down with a very clear explanation for why this is so important.

Adam Grant (26:40)

Yeah, well, empirically you're right. You know, the evidence is strong that it's important for leaders to deliver this message top down and explain they don't do it enough. Right. And explain here is why our culture is incomplete, here's how we actually want to evolve, here's what we want to learn from the organization we're merging with. Here's how our values and our practices and our norms are going to shift and we see a lot of potential there. I also think, though, that this is a time to talk about the collective relationship resume and for people across different teams to say, here's how we've done things historically, here's what's not working for us, here's what we're hoping to get better at.

Esther Perel (27:18)

So I think that one of the ways that I found always useful to do this is actually to use the polarity model of Johnson. You know it, the quadrant. No, it's really helpful. So imagine you have one model, another model, centralized, decentralized, something like that. And you're not going to convince by just saying you central people, you have to decentralize or reverse. What you do is you first start by talking quadrant one about all the good things that belong to the model that has been used. Then you talk about all the liabilities and the weaknesses in the model that you are proposing. Then you go to the liabilities and the weaknesses of the model that they have used, and only then do you go to what you think would actually be a more complementary model. Because if I try to convince you that you need to change, the main thing I do is reinforce your desire not to. It will only shift. Once I have acknowledged all the good you've done, all the weakness of mine, then the weakness of yours, and then maybe what I propose.

Adam Grant (28:25)

Well, this is why when we teach group decision making, I love to cover the evidence around discussing the pros and cons of each option before we even share our preferences around which option we think is better. Because once preferences are known, people start to jump on the bandwagon of what's popular. You get groupthink and Also, we run into the issue of it's, you know, if we're allowed to talk about which model we like, then we're going to have too much advocacy and not enough inquiry. If we're forced to go through the exercises.

Esther Perel (28:54)

I want to repeat that because it's really important. Too much advocacy and not enough inquiry or too much reactivity and not enough reflectivity. Yes, it's the same. And I just want to highlight that because so much of where we come in is companies who are exactly on the fault line of reactive or advocates. Yeah.

Adam Grant (29:15)

Now, this goes to something else that I was thinking about. If we go back to the beginning of this conversation. We were talking about autonomy versus interdependence, and then we mapped that onto one of the core dimensions of organizational culture, which is task versus relationship focus. You also mentioned what was your relationship with authority? Were you obedient? Were you more defiant? And lo and behold, it turns out that is the other major dimension of organizational culture, which is risk versus rules. And this is what we're starting to talk about now is I think, too many organizations and too many teams. It's the rigidity you were describing. They've got a set of rules that they're very comfortable with. Following them has led to success in the past. It also creates a sense of predictability and comfort and.

Esther Perel (30:01)

And safety.

Adam Grant (30:02)

Exactly.

Esther Perel (30:03)

It's rules for safety.

Adam Grant (30:04)

Yes. And I find myself really struggling in a lot of cases to nudge toward risk taking, to say, look, you've got to manage risk like a stock portfolio. You can't have all of your decisions be secure because then you will have an unbalanced portfolio. You need a mix of very predictable, safe bets and also some more unpredictable, higher risk, potentially higher return choices. How do you think about getting people to take a little bit more risk?

Esther Perel (30:31)

We all have these two fundamental sets of human needs. Security and adventure, change and stability, continuity and innovation. I mean, it's all these dualities and they spring from different sources and they pull us in different directions. But I think you're the one who said this to me once, and you said the research on trust is inconclusive and it basically operates with a complete definitional vagueness. We don't really know what is trust? Is it a condition? Is it a feeling? Is it an outcome? What exactly is it? And we don't also know if you need to trust in order to take risks. That was Rachel Botsman who added that to our conversation. Or if it actually is the act of taking risks that strengthens the trust. I have found this extremely important and useful. And I don't have an answer, but the first thing is really to explain to people the necessity of both. If you just do rules, if you just do structure and security and safety and dependability and predictability and all of that, you will fossilize and die. If you just do change and innovation and dysregulation and risk taking, et cetera, you may go chaotic, you will dysregulate and go chaotic. Both systems become ineffective and unhealthy, if we want to use that word. So again, they need each other. On any team, you need both. You need a bunch of people who say, we can't do this. And you need a bunch of people who say, let's go. This is another complementarity. It's essential that they sit at the same table and that they hear each other and that they understand that. I focus on this, but I need you because the issue at hands needs this. Most issues are a negotiation between risk taking and risk assessment.

Adam Grant (32:31)

Well, as usual, you make me think about some data. So Ella Miron Spector and Miriam Ures have shown that you get more innovation in teams if you have a mix of creative and conformist members. Correct, which is exactly the dialectic that you're describing. They also find that encouraging people to accept paradoxes as opposed to resist them boosts creativity. And so I think what often gets in the way of creative thinking and problem solving is people saying, well, we've got to resolve our differences. Right? I am somebody who loves to take risks. You are somebody who's very comfortable with familiar rules. And so we've got to pick one or the other and find a norm to follow. And the reality is that creativity flourishes when we hold those two values in tension. And we have to be open to accepting that. How? Paradox expert?

Esther Perel (33:26)

Yes, yes, the same as what we talked before. You know, most relationship issues, most organizational issues, most systemic issues are complex problems that you learn to manage. Paradoxes that you hold and not problems that you solve. It's the holding of it that is actually what's going to yield the creativity, the innovation, all of that. It's the either or that is actually not the useful path. But it's very difficult to explain that to people. So how you ask people, are there situations where you wish you had been more open to discovery, to curiosity? Sometimes I say, you are a very curious person. What makes this one more challenging for you? You know, something about this one makes you react with more stiffness, and yet usually you are quite open to alternatives. And often, by the way, this goes right back to the relationship history. This is where people's. The layers underneath begin to reveal themselves. And it's not just a work issue. It just plays out in the work issue. Sometimes I say, knowing yourself as well as you think you do, what makes it hard to work with you. Because in those situations when people can't integrate that risk and security, they polarize, they instantly polarize, and they dump on the other side. If it doesn't work, it's because of you. It's not because we did not succeed in really becoming interdependent parts who make the system thrive. It's because you did something, and if we had done it my way. And all of these are often scripts more about fear than about problem resolutions.

Adam Grant (35:11)

One thing we know is that the people who are most hesitant to take those kinds of risks are people who are minorities in an organization because they worry that if they share, especially their cultural backgrounds, they're going to stand out instead of fitting in. And despite that, you will be happy to know that there's some research by Rachel Arnett which shows that if you, as a member of a minority group that's underrepresented in an organization, if you talk about your cultural background and your upbringing, you actually end up being included more by the majority. Yes, in part that may be individuating. In part, it allows them to see you as a human being as opposed to just a stereotype of a group. They learn more about you, they can find commonalities with you. And I found that really encouraging to say the very people who are most hesitant to open up are often the people who benefit the most from doing it.

Esther Perel (36:08)

But it's not just that they benefit. The whole organization benefits. We want to give lip service to diversity, but in fact, it's really about integrating particularism with universalism. I mean, it's having colors and shades and experiences and different hierarchies and different priorities of values. And I really think that this has taken a toll because of remote work, because there's a drainage of possibilities, of situations, opportunities to say, do you want to know how we do it in my country, where I'm from, the way I learned it, then the question is, how do you elicit that? It takes people to say, I'd love to hear from you, and you may have a different perspective. Are there other points of views in the room? It would be really rich to know what are the other ways to think? It's not like the human experience is infin whatever you are going through a bunch of other people have gone through it in their own version. So please do speak. And I think that every leader, every manager, every team leader should elicit that. Ron Heifetz talks very eloquently about how much you want to elicit the minority views whenever you have an adaptive challenge. It's not so important when you have a technical problem. But adaptive challenges demand that people tolerate anxiety. And to bring in other points of views, other cultures, other narratives can be anxiety producing to those who like to live in certainty. But it's necessary

Adam Grant (37:50)

when everything is moving all at once. Your workforce, your tech stack, your business. You don't need more tools, you need one solution. That's why Paylocity built a single platform to connect hr, finance and IT with AI driven insights and automated workflows that simplify the complex and power what's next. Because when everything comes together in one place, growth comes easy experience. One place for all your HCM needs. Start now at paylocity.com 1 this podcast

Wise Ad Host (38:20)

is brought to you by Wise, the app for international people using money around the globe. With the Wise account, you can send, spend and receive in over 40 currencies with no markups and no hidden fees. Whether you're sending pounds across the pond, spending rials in Rio, or getting paid in dollars for your side gig, you'll get the mid market exchange rate on every transaction. Plus most transfers arrive in less than 20 seconds. Join 15 million customers internationally. Be smart. Get Wise. Download the Wise app today or visit wise.com Ts and Cs apply.

Vanta/BetterHelp/Factor Ads Host (38:53)

This is an ad by BetterHelp.

Adam Grant (38:55)

Did I talk too much? Can't I just let it go?

Vanta/BetterHelp/Factor Ads Host (39:04)

Take a breath. You're not alone. Let's talk about what's going on. Counseling helps you sort through the noise with qualified professionals, and online therapy makes it convenient. See if it's for you. Visit betterhelp.com randompodcast for 10% off your first month of online therapy and let life feel better.

Adam Grant (39:30)

Okay, last thing. Lightning round. Are you ready?

Esther Perel (39:33)

Yeah. Oh, I'm yes, go ahead.

Adam Grant (39:36)

Okay, what is the worst relationship building advice that you hear?

Esther Perel (39:40)

Do what's right for you and don't think about what other people think.

Adam Grant (39:44)

Okay?

Esther Perel (39:44)

Best advice the quality of your relationships will determine the quality of your life. Don't neglect them and don't think there is tomorrow. If you have something to say to someone, say it now.

Adam Grant (39:56)

Okay. Quick. Hot. Take an unpopular opinion you're eager to defend.

Esther Perel (40:03)

Don't text, leave a message. Call because the voice is the first thing we hear in utero, it is the most intimate. You can't mistake a voice and a tone and all the implicit meanings that are attached to it. But versus writing texts that are rife with misunderstandings and misinterpretations speak to people.

Adam Grant (40:27)

I think this is why asynchronous voice memos are becoming popular.

Esther Perel (40:30)

Yes. Yes.

Adam Grant (40:32)

Okay. What is something you've changed your mind about lately?

Esther Perel (40:35)

I change my mind back and forth about AI almost weekly, depending on if I see something that I find really helpful and inspiring and useful, and times when I think it's just gonna make the species disappear if this goes on. So I vacillate. I don't know that I change my mind and it's definitive, but I vacillate constantly about my thinking and AI okay,

Adam Grant (41:01)

and then last question. What's a question you have for me?

Esther Perel (41:04)

Can we do this again?

Adam Grant (41:05)

Yes, we must. I insist.

Esther Perel (41:08)

Thank you so much.

Adam Grant (41:09)

Thank you. Esther. What a blast.

Esther Perel (41:11)

As always, it's a pleasure, really.

Adam Grant (41:20)

Rethinking is hosted by me, Adam Grant. The show is produced by Ted with Cosmic Standard. Our producer is Jessica Glaser. Our editor is Alejandra Salazar. Our engineer is Asia Pilar Simpson. Our technical director is Jacob Winick. And our fact checker is Paul Durbin. Our team includes Eliza Smith, Roxanne Hylash Ben Ben Chang, Julia Dickerson, Tansika Sung Manivong, and Whitney Pennington Rogers. Original music by Hans Dale sue and Alison Layton Brown. Do you have a hard stop?

Esther Perel (41:51)

I do. What time we are going until?

Vanta/BetterHelp/Factor Ads Host (41:54)

1130.

Esther Perel (41:55)

1130? Yes. We can go over a little bit and we can give the full hour.

Adam Grant (42:00)

All right, well, that is not a hard stop then. Done.

Esther Perel (42:03)

It's all baked in.

Adam Grant (42:07)

Yeah, I'm just gonna. I'm just gonna call you out on all your lies today. Watch out. If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H VAC and plumbing supplies to lighting and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done. Hey, it's Adam Grant from Ted's podcast Work Life, and this episode is brought to you by ServiceNow. AI is only as powerful as the platform it's built into. That's why it's no surprise that more than 85% of the Fortune 500 companies use the ServiceNow AI platform, while other platforms duct tape tools together. ServiceNow seamlessly unifies people, data workflows and AI connecting every corner of your business. And with AI agents working together autonomously, anyone in any department can focus on the work that matters Most. Learn how ServiceNow puts AI to work for people@servicenow.com that new thing yeah, we've got it. The drop by GNC bringing you all the newness that matters. Hand picked by the pros who actually know what's up and what's proven to work, we keep you on top of the trends and dialed into what's next. Whether you're crushing it at the gym, leveling up your game, or thriving every day, the Drop by GNC is where the latest solutions in health and wellness land first. Nonstop innovation and fresh finds daily explore what's new and what's next on the

Vanta/BetterHelp/Factor Ads Host (43:53)

Drop by GNC Pro athletes don't spend their time meal prepping. They eat smart, train hard and recover fast. Factor makes it easy with dietitian designed chef prepared meals built to fuel your performance. Choose from high protein, calorie, smart, GLP1 support and vegetarian options designed by nutrition experts to support strength and recovery. Train Like a Pro. Eat like a Pro. Right now, go to FactorMeals.com Healthy50OFF and use code Healthy50OFF for 50% off and free breakfast for a year. That's Factor Meals.com com Healthy50OFF code Healthy50OFF.