
Hosted by Eli Ayala · EN

In this episode, Eli responds to a critic who claims that Reformed Theology (Calvinism) is logically inconsistent with presuppositional apologetics.

In this episode, Eli responds to a question that apparently no presup can or ever has answered. This is in response to a question posted on a Facebook group where Christians and atheists interact. #presup #apologetics #theology #philosophy #logic

This is Eli's first response to evidentialist apologist, and critic of presuppositionalism, David Palmann. In this video, Eli takes the time to respond to David's opening criticisms of the presuppositional apologetic approach. This episode covers issues relating to circular reasoning and the transcendental argument.David's opening statement and argumentation can be viewed here: https://youtu.be/FRtIvr1R-mI?si=-VU_MkNQ3q_3FRMT

In this episode, Eli responds to a question that apparently no presup can or ever has answered. This is in response to a question posted on a Facebook group where Christians and atheists interact.

This Atheistic Worldview Has A Major Issue

In this episode, Eli addresses the question of how to address apparent Bible contradictions that skeptics often bring up.

Join Eli as he continues walking through Cornelius Van Til's little book "Christian Apologetics" and provides running commentary for those looking for easy access into Van Til's often difficult writing.

In this episode, Eli continues his walkthrough and commentary through Cornelius Van Til's little book entitled "Christian Apologetics." Enjoy (Part 2).

In this episode, Eli is joined by Stephen Feinstein, author of the fantastic book entitled "We Destroy Arguments." This book is highly recommended for people wanting to learn a thoroughly biblical and powerfully effective approach to defending the faith.

In this episode, Eli walks through an article written by James N. Anderson where he offers an argument against atheistic naturalism. For Dr. Anderson's article can be read here: https://www.proginosko.com/2023/10/an-epistemological-argument-against-naturalism/