Podcast
Revise and Resubmit - The Mayukh Show
Hosted by Mayukh Mukhopadhyay · EN
In Revise and Resubmit, a dynamic AI duo— Nikita and Pavlov — guides you through the fascinating world of academic research. Whether they’re debating emerging trends, revisiting theories, or exploring the latest innovations, their conversational style makes scholarly insights accessible and engaging for academics. Papers chosen by Mayukh. Powered by Google NotebookLM.
38episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Unwind the clock? (Koo et al., 2026) | FT50 SMJ
1w ago01:45:46Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast Starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:43:49Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:04:49Danish Podcast Starts at 01:23:28ReferenceKoo, W. W., Zhang, M., & Choudhury, P. (2026). Unwind the clock? Temporal distance and user interactions on a digital platform. Strategic Management Journal, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70105Youtube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmitAcademy of Management PDW on Space Economy Registration Flyerhttps://cto.aom.org/discussion/flagship-aom-2026-pdw-space-economy-consolidating-a-research-agenda-8AOM SIM Curriculum Committeehttps://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committeeAOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freemanhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSILinkedin Post By Professor Erica Stecklerhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/erica-steckler-ph-d-427272_simbyte-episode-1-ed-freeman-activity-7469092002098225152-PbHM🎙️🌍 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, a place where research is not merely read, but remembered. Thank you for joining me.There are moments when the world feels astonishingly connected. A question is asked in one country. An answer appears from another. Somewhere between midnight and sunrise, knowledge quietly crosses an ocean. We often imagine this journey to be effortless. Yet perhaps it is not. 🌌💭Today, I invite you to linger over a remarkable paper titled "Unwind the Clock? Temporal Distance and User Interactions on a Digital Platform." Written by Wesley W. Koo, Miaomiao Zhang, and Prithwiraj Choudhury, and published in the Strategic Management Journal, one of the world's most prestigious FT50 academic journals, this study asks us to notice something we rarely see. ⏰📚✨Time, after all, leaves no footprints. It slips quietly between people who may never know they almost met.Using proprietary data from StackOverflow, the authors reveal that every additional hour separating two regions quietly weakens the exchange of ideas. Fewer questions are seen. Fewer answers receive recognition. Conversations that might have changed someone's understanding simply fade into silence because the participants happen to live on different sides of the clock. 🌎⌛💻What touched me most was not the mathematics, elegant though it is. It was the thought that the smallest and most specialized communities bear the greatest burden. The familiar subjects continue to find listeners. But the rare questions, the unusual skills, the lonely corners where expertise patiently waits, often remain unseen because nobody happens to be awake at the right moment. 🌱💡And yet the paper offers quiet hope. It suggests that platforms need not surrender to the tyranny of chronology. By gently reshaping how content is presented, by allowing important ideas to surface beyond the instant they were created, technology can become less of a clock and more of a bridge. 🌉✨Perhaps that is the deeper story here. Progress is not always about moving faster. Sometimes it begins by waiting long enough for someone else, somewhere else, to arrive.So as we begin today's conversation, I leave you with a question. 🤔💫If knowledge can disappear simply because two curious minds greet the same day at different hours, how many remarkable conversations have already passed us by without either person ever realizing they almost met?🙏 My heartfelt thanks to Wesley W. Koo, Miaomiao Zhang, and Prithwiraj Choudhury, and to John Wiley & Sons Ltd. for publishing this outstanding contribution in the Strategic Management Journal, a globally respected FT50 journal that continues to shape the frontiers of management research. 🌟📖🎧 If you enjoy these journeys into influential scholarship, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, subscribe to Weekend Researcher on YouTube, and remember that our episodes are also available on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcasts. Until next time, thank you for listening. 🌍🎙️📚
Transcribe →
False-Positive Psychology (Simmons et al. 2011) - Weekend Classics
1w ago01:35:11Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:24:36Hindi Podcast Starts at 00:47:20Danish Podcast Starts at 01:10:11ReferenceSimmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmit/🎙️✨ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, and to another episode of Weekend Classics. Grab your favorite cup of coffee, settle into your chair, and join me for a journey through one of those rare research papers that quietly changed the way an entire generation of scholars thinks about science. 📚☕Have you ever wondered whether a statistically significant result is always telling the truth? Or could it simply be the product of a hundred tiny decisions that nobody ever gets to see? 🤔Today, I am opening a paper that did exactly that. In 2011, Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn held up a mirror to psychological research and asked an uncomfortable question. What if researchers, often with no dishonest intention at all, could make almost any hypothesis appear significant simply by making ordinary choices about collecting data, selecting variables, or deciding when enough participants had been tested? 📊🔍The brilliance of this paper is not that it accuses science. It reminds us that science is deeply human. Every spreadsheet carries judgment. Every analysis carries choice. Every manuscript tells a story about what was included and what quietly remained in the shadows. 🌱To make their point unforgettable, the authors even presented a delightfully absurd experiment suggesting that listening to music could literally make people younger. It sounds ridiculous, and that is exactly why it works. The satire exposes a serious weakness. If flexibility hides in the research process, almost anything can look convincing. 🎵⏳😄But this is not a story about broken science. It is a story about better science. The paper ends with practical recommendations for authors and reviewers, showing that transparency does not require expensive tools or impossible standards. It simply requires the courage to reveal the full journey instead of only the polished destination. 💡📖So, before we begin, ask yourself this. If truth depends not only on the data we collect but also on the choices we never report, how many celebrated discoveries would survive if every hidden decision stepped into the light? 🌍✨🙏 My sincere thanks to Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn, and to the Association for Psychological Science for publishing this remarkable work in Psychological Science.🎧 If you enjoy episodes like this, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, subscribe to Weekend Researcher on YouTube, and remember that you can also listen on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcasts. Your support helps keep thoughtful research conversations alive. 🚀📚
Transcribe →
The unintended (negative) consequence of training (Gyensare et al., 2025) | ABDC-A* JOOP
2w ago01:46:42Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast Starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:49:49Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:10:05Danish Podcast Starts at 01:27:44ReferenceGyensare, M. A., Soetan, G., Ogbonnaya, C., Agyapong, J.-A., & Roodbari, H. (2025). Sustaining employees thriving at work through polychronicity and work engagement: The unintended (negative) consequence of training. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 98, e70017. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70017Youtube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmitAOM SIM Curriculum Committeehttps://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committeeAOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freemanhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSILinkedin Post By Professor Erica Stecklerhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/erica-steckler-ph-d-427272_simbyte-episode-1-ed-freeman-activity-7469092002098225152-PbHMWelcome to 🎙️✨ Revise and Resubmit ✨🎙️, the podcast where academic research meets human stories, where journal articles become conversations, and where every paper invites us to see familiar workplaces in a slightly different light.📚 Today, we turn our attention to an intriguing article published in the prestigious Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, an ABDC-A* ranked journal that has long served as a home for rigorous scholarship on work, people, and organizations.The paper, "Sustaining Employees Thriving at Work Through Polychronicity and Work Engagement: The Unintended (Negative) Consequence of Training", by Michael Asiedu Gyensare, Gbemisola Soetan, Chidiebere Ogbonnaya, Joan-Ark Agyapong, and Hamid Roodbari, asks a deceptively simple question. 🌱Why do some employees continue to learn, grow, and flourish even when their workdays seem crowded with competing demands?Imagine a hotel lobby on a busy afternoon. A frontline employee welcomes guests, answers calls, resolves complaints, coordinates with colleagues, and somehow still finds room to learn something new. We often celebrate this ability as efficiency. Yet beneath that surface lies a deeper story about attention, energy, and the quiet ways people sustain themselves at work.🧩 The authors explore the idea of polychronicity, a person's preference for handling multiple activities at once. Their findings suggest that people comfortable with juggling tasks often become more engaged in their work, and that engagement fuels learning, one of the key dimensions of thriving at work.But here the story takes an unexpected turn.🎭 Training, something organizations usually view as unquestionably beneficial, can sometimes become a burden. When training demands too much time, effort, or emotional energy, it begins to erode the very engagement it seeks to create. What appears to be nourishment can, under certain circumstances, become exhaustion.There is something quietly profound about that insight. The path to growth is not always blocked by a lack of opportunities. Sometimes it is crowded by too many of them.🌟 As we explore this study, conducted with 261 frontline hotel employees and their colleagues across ten four-star hotels in Ghana, we will reflect on a timeless organizational dilemma. How do we help people become better without overwhelming them in the process?🤔 And perhaps the deeper question is this: when organizations offer us more opportunities to learn, how do we know whether those opportunities are helping us thrive, or merely teaching us new ways to become tired?🙏 Our sincere thanks to the authors for their thoughtful contribution and to John Wiley & Sons Ltd and the British Psychological Society for publishing this important work.📖 If you enjoy conversations about cutting-edge academic research, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, YouTube channel Weekend Researcher, Amazon Prime, and Apple Podcasts. 🔔🎧Until next time, keep reading, keep questioning, and keep revising. 📚✨
Transcribe →
Thriving at work (Kleine et al. 2019) - Weekend Classics
2w ago01:38:32Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast Start at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Start at 00:52:09Hindi Podcast Start at 01:05:48Danish Podcast Start at 01:26:39ReferenceKleine A-K, Rudolph CW, Zacher H. Thriving at work: A meta-analysis. J Organ Behav. 2019;40:973–999. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2375Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherConnect on linkedinhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/mayukhpsm/🎙️📚 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit! 📚🎙️And welcome to another episode of 🌟 Weekend Classics 🌟, where we revisit influential research papers that continue to shape how we think about organizations, people, and work.Today, we explore a question that sounds simple but touches almost every workplace on Earth.💡 Why do some employees come alive at work while others merely survive?Some people walk into the office energized. They learn. They grow. They tackle challenges with curiosity. They leave work feeling accomplished rather than drained. What creates that difference?This episode dives into the landmark article "Thriving at Work: A Meta-Analysis" by Anne-Kathrin Kleine, Cort W. Rudolph, and Hannes Zacher, published in the prestigious ABDC-A* indexed Journal of Organizational Behavior.🔍 The authors did not study a handful of workers. They analyzed evidence from 73 independent studies involving 21,739 employees. That is a research lens wide enough to reveal patterns hidden from any single organization.Their findings tell a compelling story.🚀 Employees thrive when they bring psychological resources to work. Confidence matters. Proactivity matters. Positive emotions matter.🤝 Relationships matter too. Supportive coworkers help. Supportive leaders help. Organizations that genuinely support employees help even more.And the outcomes?📈 Better performance.😊 Higher job satisfaction.💪 Better health.🔥 Less burnout.❤️ Stronger commitment.But perhaps the most fascinating discovery is that thriving is not simply another name for engagement or positive mood. It stands on its own. It contributes something unique. Something measurable. Something powerful.Think about that for a moment.Organizations spend billions trying to improve productivity. Yet this research suggests that helping people feel both energized and continuously learning may be one of the most important investments of all.✨ Thriving is not a luxury. It is not a bonus feature. It may be one of the clearest signs that human potential is being fully expressed at work.🤔 So here is the question we leave with you today:If thriving combines vitality and learning, what would happen if organizations measured success not only by what employees produce, but by how much they grow while producing it?🙏 Our sincere thanks to the authors for this remarkable contribution and to John Wiley & Sons Ltd for publishing this influential research in the Journal of Organizational Behavior.🎧 If you enjoyed this episode, subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, follow Weekend Researcher on YouTube, and find us on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcasts.🔔 Until next time, keep reading, keep questioning, and keep revising before you resubmit!
Transcribe →
The Social Attribution of Innovation (Aversa et al., 2026) | FT50 AMJ
3w ago01:40:10Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast Starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:47:06Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:06:28Danish Podcast Starts at 01:21:43ReferenceAversa, P., Gouvard, P., & Makarova, M. A. (2026). The Social Attribution of Innovation: Uncovering the Heads Behind the Guillotine. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.0314Youtube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmitAcademy of Management PDW on Space Economy Registration Flyerhttps://cto.aom.org/discussion/flagship-aom-2026-pdw-space-economy-consolidating-a-research-agenda-8AOM SIM Curriculum Committeehttps://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committeeAOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freemanhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSILinkedin Post By Professor Erica Stecklerhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/erica-steckler-ph-d-427272_simbyte-episode-1-ed-freeman-activity-7469092002098225152-PbHM🎙️✨ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit. I’m so glad you’re here. There are some research articles that do more than present an argument. They quietly unsettle the habits of thought we have carried for years, and ask us to look again at something we believed we already understood. Today, I want to sit for a while with one such piece: The Social Attribution of Innovation: Uncovering the Heads Behind the Guillotine by Paolo Aversa, Paul Gouvard, and Maria A. Makarova, published online on 12 June 2026 in the Academy of Management Journal 📚This is, of course, no ordinary journal. Academy of Management Journal is one of the most prestigious outlets in management research and belongs to the FT50 journal list 🏛️✨ So when a paper appears here, it often arrives carrying both rigor and consequence. And this one does exactly that.What I find especially moving is the paper’s refusal to accept the familiar comfort of the “hero innovator” story. Instead, the authors lead us into a subtler and more human terrain, where inventions and inventors are not simply paired by fact, but bound together through public memory, social judgment, and repeated acts of attribution. Through the strange and enduring case of the guillotine, they show us how Dr. Joseph-Ignace Guillotin, who did not invent the machine, nevertheless became inseparable from it in the historical imagination. ⚙️🩸🧠Paolo Aversa, Paul Gouvard, and Maria A. Makarova write with a precision that feels, to me, almost forensic, yet the implications are deeply human. They remind us that recognition is rarely innocent. It gathers around those who seem to embody a problem, a value, or a public mood. Their idea of an evaluation-attribution spiral is especially compelling, because it captures how society slowly fastens a name to an innovation until the bond feels inevitable, even when it is not. 🔍💭In a way, this is a paper about invention, but also about memory, reputation, and the quiet machinery by which history decides who will stand at the center of the story.My thanks to Paolo Aversa, Paul Gouvard, and Maria A. Makarova, and to the Academy of Management, for publishing this fascinating article in such a prestigious FT50 journal 🙏📖 If you enjoy these reflective research conversations, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, and also follow the Weekend Researcher YouTube channel 🎧📺 The podcast is also available on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast 🍎✨And as we begin, I want to leave you with a question 🤔 If history remembers the wrong inventor for the right reasons, what does that reveal about innovation, and what does it reveal about us?
Transcribe →
The Broken Machine (Jones-Imhotep 2026) - Weekend Book Review
3w ago01:20:55Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:16:42Hindi Podcast Starts at 00:41:549Danish Podcast Starts at 01:04:33ReferenceEdward Jones-Imhotep (2026). The Broken Machine: Histories of Technology, Social Order, and the Self. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14893.001.0001Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmitAcademy of Management PDW on Space Economy Registration Flyerhttps://cto.aom.org/discussion/flagship-aom-2026-pdw-space-economy-consolidating-a-research-agenda-8AOM SIM Curriculum Committeehttps://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committeeAOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freemanhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSILinkedin Post By Professor Erica Stecklerhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/erica-steckler-ph-d-427272_simbyte-episode-1-ed-freeman-activity-7469092002098225152-PbHM🎙️✨ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, and to this episode of Weekend Book Review.I’m very glad you’re here. Some books do not arrive with noise. They arrive quietly, almost like a thought one has been postponing for years. The Broken Machine: Histories of Technology, Social Order, and the Self, published on 19 May 2026 by The MIT Press, feels to me like one of those books. 📚🛠️In this episode, I’m sitting with Edward Jones-Imhotep’s remarkable and unsettling study of breakdown, not merely as a mechanical event, but as a deeply human drama. What happens when a machine fails? What sort of society reveals itself in that moment? And perhaps more intimately, what kind of self is called into being when order falters? 🌫️⚙️Jones-Imhotep, a distinguished historian of science and technology at the University of Toronto, has long been attentive to the fragile boundary between systems and selves. Readers who know his earlier work, especially The Unreliable Nation, will recognize that rare quality in his scholarship: the ability to make machines feel historical, political, and strangely personal. Here, he turns to the modern Atlantic world and traces how broken technologies, from the guillotine and railway systems to slave societies, Gantt charts, and Cold War electronics, became instruments for deciding who belonged, who was disciplined, and who stood outside the imagined order of democracy and civility. 🕰️🔍There is something haunting in that idea. That a breakdown is never only a breakdown. That a faulty machine may also become a mirror. And that, for more than two centuries, societies have used such moments not only to repair devices, but to judge character, emotion, responsibility, even worth. This book seems to suggest that the modern self was shaped not in the smooth functioning of technology, but in those uneasy instants when things stopped working. 💭So today, on Weekend Book Review, I want to linger with this book carefully, and ask what it means to read malfunction as culture, as politics, and as a way of understanding the moral architecture of modern life. 🧠✨My thanks to Edward Jones-Imhotep and The MIT Press for this thought-provoking work. If you enjoy these conversations, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, and also follow the Weekend Researcher channel on YouTube 🎧📺. You can also find the podcast on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcasts 🍎🎙️And as we begin, I want to leave you with a small, restless question: when a machine breaks, are we really watching technology fail, or are we glimpsing the hidden rules by which a society imagines itself? 🌌
Transcribe →
Rewriting the Imprint (Mueller & Reus, 2026) | FT50 JoM
4w ago01:51:31Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast Starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:55:35Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:15:45Danish Podcast Starts at 01:36:08ReferenceMueller, M. J., & Reus, T. H. (2026). Rewriting the Imprint: How #MeToo Led CEOs From Male-Dominant Cultures to Increase Gender Equality. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063261449761Youtube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmitAcademy of Management PDW on Space Economy Registration Flyerhttps://cto.aom.org/discussion/flagship-aom-2026-pdw-space-economy-consolidating-a-research-agenda-8AOM SIM Curriculum Committeehttps://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committeeAOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freemanhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSILinkedin Post By Professor Erica Stecklerhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/erica-steckler-ph-d-427272_simbyte-episode-1-ed-freeman-activity-7469092002098225152-PbHM🎙️📚 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit!Every so often, a piece of research arrives that makes you wonder whether people really change, or whether the world simply gives them permission to become who they were always capable of being. 🌍✨Today's episode takes us into that uncomfortable, fascinating space where culture, memory, and leadership collide. We are discussing the remarkable new paper, "Rewriting the Imprint: How #MeToo Led CEOs From Male-Dominant Cultures to Increase Gender Equality," by Michael J. Mueller and Taco H. Reus, recently published online on 5 June 2026 in the prestigious Journal of Management.Now, the Journal of Management is not just another academic outlet. It belongs to the elite FT50 journal list, a collection of publications that shape the global conversation in business and management research. 🏆📖The authors ask a deceptively simple question. What happens when the values we inherit from childhood collide with a movement that reshapes society? Can a CEO raised in a deeply male-dominated culture genuinely rethink old assumptions? Or are early imprints too deeply carved into the human mind?Drawing on the global wave of the #MeToo movement, this study suggests something surprisingly hopeful. It finds that many leaders who once seemed least likely to change became the very people who increased opportunities for women the most. Not because they were forced to, but because a social movement created what the authors call a "second sensitive period," a moment when old beliefs could be rewritten. 💡🌱Maybe that is the larger story here. Maybe institutions do not change because rules change. Maybe they change because people find themselves staring at a mirror they never expected to face.And that leaves us with a question worth carrying into the rest of our day. 🤔If a movement can rewrite the deepest cultural imprints of a corporate leader, what forgotten imprint inside each of us is still waiting to be rewritten?🙏 Our sincere thanks to authors Michael J. Mueller and Taco H. Reus, and to SAGE Publications for bringing this outstanding research to the academic community.🎧 If you enjoy thoughtful conversations about world-class research, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, and to our YouTube channel Weekend Researcher. You can also find us on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcasts. 📺🍎🎙️Because behind every published paper, there is a story about people. And sometimes, those stories change the world. ✨
Transcribe →
Reasoning with Concepts (Gärdenfors & Matías Osta-Vélez, 2026) - Weekend Book Review
4w ago01:59:47Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:49:04Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:12:26Danish Podcast Starts at 01:35:54 ReferenceGärdenfors, P., & Matías Osta-Vélez. (2026). Reasoning with Concepts. In The MIT Press eBooks. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15931.001.0001Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmitAcademy of Management PDW on Space Economy Registration Flyerhttps://cto.aom.org/discussion/flagship-aom-2026-pdw-space-economy-consolidating-a-research-agenda-8AOM SIM Curriculum Committeehttps://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committeeAOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freemanhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSIA discussion note on SIMByteshttps://sim.aom.org/discussion/a-message-from-sims-curriculum-committee-chair-sheldene-simola-with-jennifer-griffin🎧✨ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit. This is our Weekend Book Review, the little corner of the week where I get to sit down with a book that asks us to think a little harder about the world and, perhaps, about ourselves.You know, we often imagine that reasoning is something cold and mechanical. We picture logic as a row of tidy equations marching across a blackboard. But then you watch a child recognize a dog they have never seen before, or you hear someone say, "This feels like home," and suddenly you realize that the mind works less like a calculator and more like a landscape.That is exactly where Peter Gärdenfors and Matías Osta-Vélez invite us to wander in their remarkable new book, Reasoning with Concepts: Conceptual Spaces as a Framework, published by The MIT Press on 26 May 2026. Gärdenfors, one of the pioneers of cognitive science and the architect behind the theory of conceptual spaces, has spent decades asking how meaning itself is organized. Alongside him, philosopher of science Matías Osta-Vélez brings a deep curiosity about how humans and intelligent systems actually make sense of the world.And together they offer a beautiful, almost geometric idea. Maybe our minds do not reason by following rigid rules. Maybe we move through invisible spaces, where thoughts have shape, memories have distance, and ideas become neighbors. Similarity, typicality, analogy, expectation, they are not separate puzzles at all. They are different paths through the same mental landscape.As someone fascinated by both marketing and artificial intelligence, I found myself wondering whether the future of AI will belong not to machines that calculate faster, but to machines that can understand concepts the way people do. Perhaps intelligence is less about finding the right answer and more about knowing which ideas belong close together.📖 So today, we are going to explore a book that quietly bridges psychology, philosophy, cognitive science, and AI, and asks one deceptively simple question: How do our minds know what belongs where?💛 A heartfelt thank you to authors Peter Gärdenfors and Matías Osta-Vélez, and to The MIT Press, for bringing this thought-provoking work into the world.🎙️ If you enjoy conversations where research feels a little more human, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify and follow our YouTube channel, Weekend Researcher. You can also find us on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcast.🌌 And when this episode is over, I hope one question stays with you: if our lives are really built from concepts connected by invisible distances, then what forgotten idea has been sitting quietly at the center of your own mental map, waiting for you to notice it?
Transcribe →
Fly Solo, Then Return Home? (Sieger et al 2026) | FT50 JMS
Jun 701:36:03Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast Starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:43:27Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:00:07Danish Podcast Starts at 01:20:36ReferenceSieger, P., Brinkerink, J., Baù, M., Karlsson, J. and De Massis, A. (2026), Fly Solo, Then Return Home? Offspring's Entrepreneurship Experience and their Future As Family Business Successors. J. Manage. Stud.. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70114Youtube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmitAcademy of Management PDW on Space Economy Registration Flyerhttps://cto.aom.org/discussion/flagship-aom-2026-pdw-space-economy-consolidating-a-research-agenda-8AOM SIM Curriculum Committeehttps://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committeeAOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freemanhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSIA discussion note on SIMByteshttps://sim.aom.org/discussion/a-message-from-sims-curriculum-committee-chair-sheldene-simola-with-jennifer-griffin🎙️📚 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit!The place where research papers stop looking like intimidating stacks of PDF files and start sounding like stories about real people, real choices, and the wonderfully complicated business of being human. 🌍✨Today, we are diving into a fascinating new article, "Fly Solo, Then Return Home? Offspring's Entrepreneurship Experience and their Future As Family Business Successors," by Philipp Sieger, Jasper Brinkerink, Massimo Baù, Johan Karlsson, and Alfredo De Massis, recently published online on 29 May 2026 in the Journal of Management Studies, one of the world's most respected management journals and a proud member of the prestigious FT50 journal list. 🏆📖Every family business carries a quiet question that is rarely written into the balance sheet. Will the next generation stay, or will they leave? And perhaps even more importantly, if they leave to chase their own dreams, can they ever truly come back?This paper follows thousands of families across Sweden and discovers something deeply human. Sometimes the child who walks away to build a company of their own is not abandoning the family legacy at all. They are preparing themselves for it. Entrepreneurship becomes less of an escape and more of an apprenticeship. 🚀🏡But life is never that simple. What happens when that independent venture becomes wildly successful? What happens when personal ambition and family obligation begin pulling in opposite directions? The authors show that succession is not just a business transaction. It is a conversation between generations, shaped by opportunity, identity, and the enduring gravity of home. ❤️In many ways, this research reminds us that families are strange little economies. We invest in each other, we compete with each other, we leave, and sometimes, after seeing the world, we discover that the road forward circles back to where we started.🙏 Our sincere thanks to the authors for this thoughtful contribution and to the Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. for bringing this outstanding work to the scholarly community.🎧 If you enjoy conversations where big ideas meet everyday life, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify and follow our YouTube channel Weekend Researcher. You can also find us on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast. 🔔🎙️📺And before we begin, here is a question worth carrying with you:🤔 When young people leave home to discover who they are, are they really walking away from their family's story, or are they quietly writing its next chapter?
Transcribe →
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Freeman 1984) - Weekend Classics
Jun 602:07:39Tap to summarizeEnglish Podcast starts at 00:00:00Bengali Podcast Starts at 01:00:44Hindi Podcast Starts at 01:22:59Danish Podcast Starts at 01:46:50ReferenceFreeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139192675Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcherPodcast Websitehttps://mayukhmukhopadhyay.com/reviseandresubmitAcademy of Management PDW on Space Economy Registration Flyerhttps://cto.aom.org/discussion/flagship-aom-2026-pdw-space-economy-consolidating-a-research-agenda-8AOM SIM Curriculum Committeehttps://sim.aom.org/curriculum/curriculum-committeeAOM SIM-Bytes Episode 1 - Dr Ed Freemanhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/EBSA7WvQNSILinkedin Post By Professor Erica Stecklerhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/erica-steckler-ph-d-427272_simbyte-episode-1-ed-freeman-activity-7469092002098225152-PbHM🎧✨ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, and to another episode of our beloved Weekend Classics.Every once in a while, I come across a book that feels less like a management textbook and more like a gentle correction to the way we've been looking at the world. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach is one of those books.When R. Edward Freeman first published it back in 1984, the business world was still largely telling one story. Companies existed to serve shareholders. Profit came first, and everything else followed. But Freeman, who began his academic journey studying mathematics and philosophy before becoming one of the world's most influential thinkers in business ethics, asked a wonderfully simple question. What if a company is really a community? What if customers, employees, suppliers, governments, and even society itself are not distractions from business, but the very reason business exists?I have always loved books that make complicated ideas feel deeply human, and this one does exactly that. It reminds me that behind every quarterly report is a factory worker heading home to family, a supplier betting on a contract, a customer placing trust in a brand, and a manager trying to balance impossible expectations. Freeman did not merely give us a framework. He gave us a different pair of glasses.Perhaps that is why this book still matters more than forty years later. In an age of AI, climate change, social media storms, and global uncertainty, the old map often feels too small for the territory. Stakeholder theory asks us to widen the frame and see business as an ongoing act of creating value together.📖 So today, we revisit this modern classic from Cambridge University Press, originally part of the Pitman series in Business and Public Policy, and explore why generations of scholars and managers still return to its pages.A heartfelt thank you to Professor R. Edward Freeman for giving the world an idea that continues to shape how we think about capitalism, and to Cambridge University Press for keeping this remarkable work alive for new readers.🎙️ If you enjoy conversations where books become stories and theories become human, please subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, YouTube channel Weekend Researcher, Amazon Prime Music, and Apple Podcasts. Your support helps this little community of curious minds keep growing.💭 And before we begin, I want to leave you with one question.If the true measure of a business is not simply the wealth it creates for owners, but the lives it touches along the way, then who, really, is the most important stakeholder in the story?
Transcribe →