Austin Hankwitz (2:43)

All right, Robert, let's now jump into the interview. Hey, everyone, and welcome back to the Rich Habits podcast, a top 10 business podcast on Spotify brought to you by public.com by the end of today's episode episode, you're going to understand why credit plays such a powerful role in everyday life, why not all forms of credit are created equal, and how the future of payments, especially after the recent headlines with Trump potentially putting a 10% cap on credit card interest rates, may look very different from the penalty driven systems most consumers are used to. My name is Austin Hankwitz. I'm joined by my co host, Robert Kroke. Robert is a seasoned entrepreneur with lifetime revenues of over 300 million. And I'm a multimillionaire in my late 20s with a background in finance and economics. As the show name might suggest, every episode we talk about rich habits as they relate to business, finance and mindset. But Robert, today's a little different. We've got an awesome interview. So who are we sitting down with in this episode?

Robert Kroke (3:41)

That's right. Today we're joined by Max Levchin, founder and CEO of a firm. Max is one of the original co founders of PayPal, where he served as chief Technology officer before its acquisition by ebay. He's also founded and scaled multiple technology companies, served on the boards of Yelp and Yahoo, and is an active investor in more than 100 startups, which is just incredible. A firm was born out of Max's belief that credit should be honest, transparent, and aligned with the consumer without late fees, hidden charges, or compounding interest traps. We're excited to dig into all those details and what they really mean in today's episode. Max, welcome to the show.

Max Levchin (4:22)

Thank you. Great to be here.

Austin Hankwitz (4:23)

Well, I'm really excited about this conversation, Max, because credit at its core has existed in some form for literally thousands of years. Right, we know that. But today it plays a very important role in people's lives. It seems like if you want to do absolutely anything worth doing, like buying a car, renting an apartment, qualifying for a mortgage. Right. You need to have a positive relationship with credit. How do you think the role of credit in modern society has evolved over time? Specifically as a tool now, for investing in your future, think education, owning assets like a home or even career opportunities.

Max Levchin (5:00)

That's exactly right. I'm not sure there's a ton more to add to the punchline, and that is thoughtful, responsible usage of credit is basically investing in your future self, your future success, and can take the form of anything understood as borrowing for your education. Vast majority of Americans, yours truly included, had to borrow money to afford higher education. We all understand and you know, things are changing pretty rapidly with AI. But even in the world of post AI world, my guess is being well trained to do a job will pay better. And so when we go to college, when we go to vocational school, we borrow money because the future earnings are all but assured. And that's kind of the canonical use case. There are many others in terms of investing in a productive version of yourself, including borrowing money for a small business startup, et cetera, et cetera. The kind of more varied use of credit, if you will, is just affordability. Where you're borrowing money for car, to get to your job, or perhaps to just tool around, you obviously have to borrow money for a home. These things are expensive, but they are kind of the American dream, the storage of wealth. And you definitely should be investing in your real estate holdings if you can. And so borrowing money is typically the only way to go about it. And then probably the most banal but most frequently used case for credit is simply smoothing out your personal cash flow. For a lot of folks, it is not a guarantee that the, you know, suddenly necessary or even pre planned thousand dollars purchase is something that just comes right out of savings account and it's no big deal. And you know, for many things account does have that thousand dollars, but it is scary to drain it because what if an unexpected hit comes in next? And there's sort of oft repeated line about Americans are a couple hundred dollars away from real financial trouble in case of a medical emergency, et cetera. And so usage of credit, when done right, just provides that sense of control and certainty of your personal finances, even at the sort of couple hundred dollars couple, you know, sometimes under $100. And so that's where a firm plays obviously. And we really see our role and our mission to provide this sense of clarity and control for each consumer as they navigate their ups and downs of everyday life.

Austin Hankwitz (7:10)

I think that's a wonderful segue actually into our next question. So Robert, kick us off.

Robert Kroke (7:14)

Yeah, Max, one thing a firm is very vocal about is not all credit is created equal. So can you walk us through the structural differences between revolving credit cards and transaction level lending mod like buy now, pay later, like a firm, and why those differences actually matter so much for consumers over time.

Max Levchin (7:33)

It's a great prompt and obviously I'm very passionate in the issue, so I'll try to keep it compact. Interrupt me and ask me to clarify if I'm not clear since this, this all makes so much sense in my head. I think it makes a lot of sense to our roughly 40 plus million consumers. But the basic difference between revolving credit and not is you're essentially signing up to a product that gives you no sense for when you're going to be out of debt. Most of us sort of consciously or subconsciously subscribe to Benjamin Franklin's point of view that it's generally speaking not a great idea to be in debt. And yet, as we established, it's actually a really, really useful tool to have credit for anything from cars to everyday purchases. And so how do you sort of slice this thing into two parts in a way that makes, makes sense for both of those approaches? And it's really simple. You have to know when you're done paying off whatever it is you borrowed that gives you the sleep at night. The I know my schedule, I got control. All those positive things come with the notion of start here, this many payments and there, that is how a firm works. But before I get there, that is not how credit cards work. So credit cards basically say, swipe, you know your rate. You kind of know some fees might apply, but what you don't know is when are you going to be done. If you look at the design of credit cards, it's actually deliberately made obscure. If you look at the fine print, which 99% of us never do. But if you flip your paper statement, there's a lot of sort of nine point font in grayscale telling you here's all sorts of things that could go wrong, including when your rate might get adjusted, et cetera, et cetera. But the most important thing that it doesn't say, doesn't say anywhere, is when you swipe a card, you'll be done paying the swipe off by date X, because that doesn't exist. You have a notion of a minimum payment where the card tells you, hey, you gotta roughly pay off 3% of your balance every month, otherwise there'll be problem. The reason for it is very, very simple. Not passing any judgment here, although I obviously am, the bank that gave you the card has the following math to go through. Here's a total balance. You got interest, which is what accrues.

Austin Hankwitz (9:35)

Over the course of the time it.

Max Levchin (9:36)

Takes you to pay it back, Whatever you haven't paid back, There is interest calculation goes in that goes right into the principal, the total amount you have to pay back. So the longer the balance stays high, the more money you'll owe to the bank. The reason the minimum payment exists is basically some degree of both regulatory pressure and the banks need to believe that you're still going to pay something. But in general, they kind of want you to stay with a big balance, accruing a bunch of interest and just paying it off for as long as possible because that maximizes their profits. It's a business model, but is a very, very stressful product for the end borrower. A firm was born from this realization that most of us actually have a very stressful relationship with our credit cards. We don't know when we're going to be done paying it off. And so for thousands of years there was a notion of an installment loan where you would say, I'm going to borrow X dollars, I'm going to pay it off in Y months. There'll be some interest or, you know, z whatever, whatever variable you want to use at the end of the period, I'll be out of debt. Maybe there'll be some fluctuations, there might be some rescheduling, whatever. But generally speaking, everything going well, I will be out of debt for this particular transaction in this many months. That is literally what we built. And before things like smartphones and online transactions, it was very hard to scale that kind of borrowing, which is, by the way, this is exactly what you do when you buy a car. Exactly, we do when you buy a home. So the installment loan is alive and well, even sometimes use that in buying big things like refrigerators or H vac systems. Really expensive stuff. Doing this for a $200 purchase, it's a lot of work. Just swipe your plastic and move on. Because of the Internet, because of smartphones, because of modern technology, we can scale this down and give it to you in a form of a little menu that shows up everywhere you go these days. Where available in everything from Amazon on down and E Commerce and now in store, where you just say, hey, I want to borrow 500. I want to be done in six months. Here's my monthly payment. Off we go. And that is the fundamental difference between borrowing with revolving or not revolving. The fancy way of thinking about it mathematically is revolving is essentially constantly refinancing your debt, which most of us know. Constantly refinancing your Debt is probably a bad idea because you're staying in debt, affirm and binocular in general, you don't have that option. And that's a good thing. You actually are given a constraint that keeps you clear and in control and sleeping well at night because you know when the transaction is done being paid off.

Austin Hankwitz (11:56)

Max, why do you think those structural differences, expenses actually matter so much for the consumers over a long period of time? Specifically from helping them achieve those outcomes of not finding themselves just up to their eyeballs in debt across this card, this card, this card. Why is it so important for those consumers to have this difference with this buy now, pay later. Understand that installment loan, the very basic.

Max Levchin (12:20)

Answer is because planning is hard and planning against exponential curves is like basically impossible. So fun anecdote, true story. 15ish years ago, when we just started a firm, we were still. I've been in payments, Internet payments, my entire adult life, so kind of a professional, if you want to, if you want to call it that. And our first cfo, Rob and I were flying from San Francisco to New York to try to explain our newly created business to some potential investors. And we were deciding sort of how do, how do we explain this thing? So like, credit cards are kind of easy. Like everybody knows how they work. And this thing is like a thing throwback to basic installment lending, by the way. We don't compound interest into principal. We're not going to charge late fees. We're going to make it super user friendly. So we were supposed to make a presentation. So deck page number one was, here's how a firm works. Borrow $500, decide on an interest rate. On my own, let's say $30 more over the course of the next six months, 530 divided by six, off you go. That, that's your family done.

Austin Hankwitz (13:17)

Next page.

Max Levchin (13:18)

Like, oh, here's what it costs to do a credit card. So like, well, we didn't. This is in the days when they have an especially great WI FI connection on the plane. So we're like, well, instead of looking it up on some online calculator, we're just going to do it by hand here. Because we're mathematicians, we're credit card rates, whatever. So in the next six hours, the entire flight to New York separately, doing this initially on napkins, that unreal pad, they're like, all right, well, we don't seem to agree on a number. If you borrow $500 with a credit card and you have a minimum payment of X and a rate of Y and you're not going to be late. So there's no late fees to compute over. What's the total cost? And so at the end we landed without a number that we could agree on and by then we were both modeling it in Excel. And then we finally got on WI Fi and looked it up online and neither of our numbers was right and that number came from some random online bank that was willing to pre calculate for it. So the short version of the answer is no one knows what the true cost of credit is. And with a firm you do. And the reason it's hard to plan, you have family, you have health issues, you have job issues, all the things that kind of you have to deal with because they're real stressors. Why would you want to add a stress of I have no idea how to think about my money and yet it is one of the most important topics people think about all the time. And so just the reason it's so important is because it's a stress, it's a weight you don't have to carry. You can just use something like affirm or please use a firm obviously and feel easier and better about yourself and about your money and not worry, when will I be done paying it off? What's the true cost? You really cannot know the true cost of a card swipe cannot even, you know, people who are supposedly professionals cannot figure it out. You know, how will the normal people do?

Austin Hankwitz (14:59)

So this makes a ton of sense to me. This seems like, you know, a better mousetrap, as they call it, than a credit card. You clearly understand it's an old mousetrap.

Max Levchin (15:06)

But it is a better one.

Austin Hankwitz (15:08)

This is an old mousetrap, but it's better. For sure. It makes a lot of sense why this is better than the current situation we have with, you know, our current lending system. So why aren't more companies doing this? We look around to the current lending system, it's littered with penalties, late fees, unclear terms. To your point, why are they still using these old revolving credit models where you all are trying to help people understand what to borrow when you need to pay it back by and just very clear terms on if you don't pay it back, this is going to happen. Like why aren't more people doing this?

Max Levchin (15:40)

Two reasons. It's really convenient and it's really profitable. The profitability of a revolving credit is easy to imagine. Like if you, if you want to, if you, if you remember your high school math, the cost of credit with a firm is basically a total cost of the whole loan with plus whatever you might pay a firm is, you can think of it as a line like you sort of. It starts with your first payment, ends with a last payment. It's a line people are pretty well wired to think linearly, like 1, 2, 3, 4. Like, I kind of know what the.

Austin Hankwitz (16:09)

Next number is going to be.

Max Levchin (16:09)

I can predict that credit card cost is an exponent. In other words, it's a thing that looks like a curve. 1, 2, 4. For a lot of you, it's like, is it 8 or 6, the next one? And so we are wired to think it's going to be six, but it's actually going to be eight if we're talking about an exponential curve here, and so on. And so the cause is hard to figure out because it is stressful. And I think people who issue credit cards, revolving credit cards anyway, understand that it's stressful. But because most of us have a hard time figuring out whether it's a 6 or an 8th or, or 16, there's a lot of profit in between those numbers. And so once you taste that profitability, it's very hard to go back. You have shareholders, you have people saying, wow, that's an amazing mousetrap you invented there with so much profitability. So that's not hard to see why the incentives are on the wrong side of that story. It's also the case that revolving credit is a more flexible model. I'm not actually into revolving credit as a concept. I just think that you need a lawyer present at all times because you need to read the fine print. You need to know the penalties. You need to know how the minimum, minimum payment factors into this thing. What happens if your rate changes? So as a corporate borrowing mechanism, if you look at, like giant companies borrowing money from each other, from banks, sure, use revolving credit all you like. That's a great idea. They have massive lawyers, armies on staff. As a consumer, you just have you. So simpler is absolutely better. And by the way, it's also cheaper. And so in the case of a firm, you will pay less just because there's not that exponential curve. It's hard for those that created these exponential curves to say, cool, I'm going.

Austin Hankwitz (17:37)

To get out of this business.

Max Levchin (17:38)

I'm just going to start charging these linear terms. And so I think the world, by the way, is changing for the better. And I'm sure we'll get into it because it is the topic of the moment. But there's a couple of things happening secularly that are pretty conducive to the positive Change. So part one, we're all getting smarter. AI tools are there, they're available, they're really inexpensive, a lot of them are free. Now you sort of have a financial advisor available to you at all times from the likes of ChatGPT and Gemini and everything in between. And so over time you'll get better and smarter about just managing your money, thinking about your money. Maybe you'll still be stressed, but at least you'll have transparency into what's really going on. So I think we're all getting smarter about money. Two, we took a really maximalist approach where we said no late fees, no compounding, we cap out the total amount of cost you could possibly pay us back. So if you borrow 500 and interest is 30 and then something went wrong and you've rescheduled a payment, that 30 doesn't change, it's still 5:30. Obviously we're leaving money on the table. It's open to abuse. So we have to be thoughtful about it. But generally speaking, we picked this because we want it to be super simple. We want it to be really, really easy to understand. When we started, I met a bunch of people who run banks that issue these revolving credit cards and 100% of them told me you're insane. Like this is far less profitable. It's never going to work. You're an idiot. Just get over yourself and issue a credit card already. And you'd recognize some of the names of of these CEOs by the way. These are like, you know, well known, very thoughtful, very smart people. Fast forward 15 years, it's not just us. More than half of buy now pay later. Volume in the US does not charge late fees. We were the only ones that start. It's now more than half the industry. And so people are generally realizing that if you treat the consumer right, they are loyal to you. North of 95% of our transactions come from repeat customers. So there's something in this product that really makes sense. And so as, as we sort of went around doing are saying that we only the way we we would do it, people start to copy us and, and that is a good thing. Like I love the fact that more and more people are shifting to no late fees. More and more banks are offering some version of buy now really pre price credits. They have upfront pricing and many are now saying we'll not have any fees. So it's all kind of shifting towards this model. But I think for folks that primarily make money on revolving, it's just going to take a very long Time to kind of get off the drug of the profits that these things generate.

Austin Hankwitz (19:54)

Now, before we ask Max our next question, Robert and I have a very special announcement to make. We built the Rich Habits Money Map for both personal and business finances. Quick shout out to those side hustlers. And it's a really cool plug and play setup that reflects exactly how we think about money, which is to save first, invest consistently and let systems do the work for you. The name of our podcast is Rich Habits for a reason, because knowing what to do with your money is only half the battle. The real key to building wealth is making sure those habits actually happen consistently without just relying on willpower. That's why We've partnered with GetSequence IO. GetSequence IO is how you turn your money habits into automatic systems so that your money saves, invests and works for you in the background automatically. With GetSequence IO, you create rules for your money and when something happens, like getting paid from your employer or revenue hitting your business bank account, those rules execute automatically. Saving, investing, taxes, debt, all of it gets handled automatically without you even having to think about it. With GetSequence IO, we at Rich Habits.

Robert Kroke (21:07)

Teach you what the right moves for your money are. GetSequence IO helps you follow the system without relying on memory. GetSequence IO takes your entire financial life, personal accounts, business accounts, credit cards, loans, and organizes them all into one clean money map. From there, sequence actually helps set everything up for you and tailor it to your situation. Want to save first every paycheck? Done. Want to invest consistently without timing the market? Done. Want to automatically set aside money for taxes or optimize debt repayment? GetSequence IO can do that too. And if you're a business owner like me, this is huge. You can automate taxes, expenses, payroll and cash reserves without spreadsheets or manual transfers. If you want your rich habits to actually happen automatically, check out the Rich Habits Money Map at getsequence IO Rich Habits Podcast and take the stress out of managing your money.

Austin Hankwitz (22:03)

We are super proud of the Rich Habits Money Map what we've built in partnership with GetSequence IO. So please go check it out. Go use it. It is going to a game changer for you. All right, Robert, back to our interview with Max.

Robert Kroke (22:15)

So that's a great lead into my next question. One of the firm's biggest differentiators is that every transaction is underwritten individually. Rather than extending an open ended revolving line of credit like legacy banks do with their credit card purchases so why was it so important to take the harder path, specifically underwriting every purchase instead of relying on late fees and hidden charges to drive revenue like the credit card companies do today?

Max Levchin (22:40)

A couple of different reasons, actually. So one of the things I realized at the very beginning is a lot of the fees and a lot of kind of the stuff that we all have come to hate about credit cards is actually there because the provider doesn't get a chance to say to a consumer, hey, wait a second, that's a bad idea. You're borrowing money. Maybe you really won this couch or this bicycle or whatever it is you borrow money for, but it's just a dumb financial move. You're making a mistake. Put that card down. Let's rethink this. In part because these cards are so convenient. Like, I touched on, just swipe the plastic and it happens. There's nothing to sign, nothing to really sort of upfront, nothing to think about. That creates for a wonderful engine of the economy, if you will, but it sure allows you to overspend. So one of the key early design criteria was, what if we made purchasing conscious? What if we made you ask yourself, is this a good idea? And what if we gave ourselves a voice that would allow us to make it cheaper for both sides? If you get into debt, if you get into a purchase that you shouldn't have, we should lower things like return rates because you might not be trying to get out of a thing you shouldn't have bought in the first place. We will definitely lower defaults and delinquencies because we would tell you we understand a financial situation reasonably well. This seems like a dumb move. Like, at least let us ask you more questions. So sometimes if you use a firm, like, really extensively, you'll see we won't just say, oh, cool, okay, you know, let's go with this transaction. We'll say things like, this seems like something we need to learn more about. Can you please tell us your income, or can you please let us see into your bank account so that we can understand your cash flow better, so that we can tell you whether it's a good idea or a bad idea? None of this is available in credit cards because the transactions are literally one touch and you go. And so we wanted this interaction to give ourselves the right to communicate with you and to ask you sort of like, is this a good call? That is also why our delinquencies and defaults are so much lower than the standard credit card world, because we do have a chance to tell you, wait a second. This is a bad move. We're going to say no. If you want to do this thing, you should make a bigger down payment. You should maybe save up. Maybe you just shouldn't do it at all. And it seems like a exactly kind of thing. A consumer product designer be like, oh, my God, you're telling someone no. It turns out that people love this. They really enjoy the interaction of. I mean, no one likes to be told no, but if you're like, sorry, it's a hard no, your card's been declined versus, hey, here's kind of why you should reconsider, by the way. There's probably a way to come into this item that you want, but you should save up and make a bigger down payment because then you can afford the monthly payments. And so that was a key design criteria. As we thought of this, we realized that we wouldn't need late fees, we wouldn't need all the crutches because they really primarily exist to cover up for the, oh, man, we should have never given you a line of credit that long. And that's why it works as well as it does.

Austin Hankwitz (25:24)

That is fascinating. I mean, I've never used a firm. I've never done the buy now, pay later stuff. But I very much understand installment loans, understand how you get. Right. So. But I've never had to, like, you know, do some sort of installment loan to buy a refrigerator or something. I normally just pay cash for stuff like that. Right. So, like hearing for the first time right now that that's the way you guys approach it. I know you underwrite every purchase like that, but it's. How have you been able to scale that? You mentioned 40 million. I mean, is this just AI on steroids that you guys are. Are sort of underwriting transaction by transaction?

Max Levchin (25:53)

That's right. And every. Every transaction is underwritten by machines. No humans are involved. We actually find that we are much better as software engineers in terms of underwriting. And by we here, I mean the industry. And so the throwback to the 1950s, where a fast banker shakes your hand and says, you, sir, look like a good risk because you look just like me. Like, that's where all the discrimination came from. People like, oh, you know, I don't want to lend to someone who doesn't look like he's from this neighborhood is like, that was a. It's a great thing that we left all of that behind. Machines are really, really good. They're also very good at saying things like, I will not consider race. I will not find out what race you are. I'm not going to guess what race you are because it's in a legal basis. Shouldn't use that, can't use that. And so it's much easier actually if you have the capacity to build these models and train them to build a really good, very fair model that will pass your fair lending exams and all the sort of usual regulatory hurdles that you have to clear if you lend. So we have a giant infrastructure that does. We've been an AI company for a lot longer than AI companies were. Cool. And for a little while I was bothered by the AI revolution. I've been on the forefront of this thing forever and it's obviously, you know, this particular tide is lifting all the boats and has been lifting us for a very long time. But yeah, it's all entirely machine driven. We have a large group of AI and machine learning engineers that are extraordinary. We continue building completely different kinds of models that the industry has never seen before and deploying them. And we do it responsibly. So we run it right alongside older models and make sure that the new model approves more people with better financial results and doesn't discriminate and all that good stuff. And so it's probably the, the very core of what's happening at a firm is just a bunch of math nerds who are obsessed with credit and also have this like extremely clear point of view on what isn't, isn't moral. And that's allowed us to build a pretty, pretty great company.

Austin Hankwitz (27:40)

That's incredible. And you know, it really kind of bodes to your own experience as an immigrant.

Max Levchin (27:45)

Right.

Austin Hankwitz (27:45)

You were talking about how specifically you thought that the legacy credit systems might have failed you in the past despite being financially responsible. Didn't fit this perfect mold of, of being from the right neighborhood or looking or firm handshake, whatever.

Max Levchin (28:00)

Right.

Austin Hankwitz (28:00)

So like, let's just maybe zoom out. Can you tell us about that story and how it ultimately led you to founding a firm?

Max Levchin (28:05)

So before affirm, before the current, the current thing. My current thing was PayPal, which I co founded basically straight out of college. I got to the US just a year and a half before college. So I was completely sort of fresh immigrant. I came from USSR at the time. And so my exposure to capitalism or American credit system was, let's say non existent. So I got to college, I got my first credit card on campus. That was great. I didn't make my minimum payments because I didn't read the fine print. But who does? You know, you're busy doing homework and 90 days into not making any payments, I got an extremely nasty notice saying, hey, like one, your credit card is not going to work anymore. Two, you owe us $600, so get on it. And by the way, your credit score is trashed. I'm like, well, I can go earn $600. Which I didn't paid it off and didn't think of it twice. Fast forward six years, we just took PayPal public. I was independently wealthy and I decided that it's time to upgrade my Honda to a Mercedes. So I flew to LA with my then girlfriend, now wife, went to a car dealership and said, I'd like to buy this really cool looking Mercedes convertible. And I said, great, we're going to talk to the finance department, they're going to get you a car loan. It's going to be great. Five minutes later, get back, said, actually you can't buy this car. In fact young man, you should get out of here. And I was like, wait a second, what's going on? So while we looked up your credit score and even though we know your name, because PayPal just made the rounds of news and LA Times did this big spread on, you know, PayPal founders make good, yada yada yada, your credit score basically says you're a deadbeat. We don't know what you did to yourself back in the day, but, but with a fico score of 600 or 500 something, you can't buy this car. Like, you know, maybe you can go rent one. And so I, first of all, I was embarrassed to like, my, the, the, the, the color of my face was several shades darker for, for a couple hours and I eventually had to figure out a way to pay cash for the car. And that stuck with me where like, and the unfairness, the fact that the, the mistake I made in college, which I rectified very quickly, was six years ago and my credit score hadn't recovered and I looked like a total idiot in front of the girl I was trying to impress at the time. And anyway, so that, that sticks with you for a lot longer than you might expect. Another five or six years went by and I would still look up my credit score, which I became very conscious of, and it would still not update and it would still be like, yeah, you know, you've never been late in the last 10 years, but hey, you're not that good of a risk. And so after PayPal, I was hanging out with one of my earliest compatriots there and he and I just got into this long Debate of, like, how in. He was very aware of the embarrassing car purchase story. And so we sort of got talking about, like, why didn't we bring the kind of math expertise and willingness to go the extra mile and figuring out human behavior through AI and modeling, which we did at PayPal, by the way. Plenty. Why don't we bring that to credit and sort of like, we don't really have a good answer. Maybe we were too young, didn't understand credit at the time. We were just too focused on payments. And one thing led to another. He and I co founded this company. So that.

Austin Hankwitz (31:01)

That's.

Max Levchin (31:01)

That's the full story of a firm. There's no better story, no better motivation. Their personal thing that sits in the back of your head and still embarrasses you.

Robert Kroke (31:08)

That's just an incredible backstory because you think about it from the. The experiences I've had as an entrepreneur for 35 years, I can have a great year, make all this money. And they're like, where's your W2s when I go for a loan? Where's this? Where's that? I'm like, I own my own companies. I make money. It's not traditional income. And they frown on you because the credit system, to me, has been kind of broken for a very, very long time. So I love that story. And the fact that you took a problem, your own personal problem, and then you made this great company to help so many other people deal with the same issue. Because I know I've dealt with it in the past, not in many years, but it's definitely an incredible journey. And thank you for sharing that. Before we go into the next question.

Max Levchin (31:50)

One sort of asterisk or a postscript into this thing. Part of why it took me so long is even when you're young, you don't have the empathy for others as much as you do 10 years later. Affirm started when I was in my late 30s and in my early 20s when this happened. Like, it's just me. This sucks. Like, this. This was so embarrassing. But obviously I'm the only person that ever happened to. In my late 30s. I knew enough people who had a version of the story, because I would get triggered when somebody would say, I got declined for this, or I was told my rate's going to be that.

Robert Kroke (32:18)

Like.

Max Levchin (32:18)

Like, oh, let me tell you my story. I was so angry. So by the time I got to it, I was like, oh, my God. Like, I know all these people, and this is a terrible, broken system.

Austin Hankwitz (32:27)

I got to do something that was Max's villain arc. And that's why you got the arc on the Affirm logo, huh?

Max Levchin (32:32)

Actually, the. The arc in the Affirm logo was not my idea. For years, I was designing Affirm logos, and it turns out that I'm a bad designer. I'm a. I think I'm an okay product designer, but visually, I got nothing. And at some point, we hired someone who's really good, and he said, you know, a firm is like a warm rainbow cover that keeps you safe and makes you feel good about money. That sounds great. Like, I'm going to add a rainbow. Sounds good to me.

Austin Hankwitz (32:55)

So would you say, Max, that that experience is what still energizes you today about a firm's mission? Or is it maybe the future of what a firm could turn into in 10 years time? We've got AI, you know, a couple years now into this, several years into it from your perspective. But what's making you wake up every morning say, I need to go turn our 40 million customers into 400 million.

Max Levchin (33:15)

You know, I think the core of mission is still very energizing. Like, you can probably tell I get fired up thinking about this. This isn't fake. Like, I. I get out of bed and think about top 10 things I need to get done that day and get stressed out, and they're like, wait, I know why I'm doing this. This is really important. Like, it was important to young me, it's important to old me, and I think it's important to a lot of people worldwide. So that. That motivates me. And that's just in and of itself great fuel. The other thing, and I think it's really true about all businesses and particularly true about payments businesses. It's sort of truly fractal. Like, every time you look into a thing, an opportunity or a problem, and you start solving it, you make lists of like, oh, my God, if I ever have the time, I'll get to that other thing, because that's even more embarrassing or even more horrifying. And so the motivation, just from the entrepreneurial perspective, like, I have this long list of things we're supposed to fix in this industry that we just got around to fixing credit cards, but not even that fully. There's all these other things credit cards are used for that we're not being used for. And so the to do list of things, products to build, things to ship is only growing. Like, I have no shortage of, oh, man, I just had a little bit more time or a few more engineers. And so this AI productivity Age we're hitting now is actually an incredible boom because I can imagine shipping more stuff faster. That's what motivates me. And it's exciting to be alive. It's exciting to be able to build software with plain English instead of having to train people how to write code. And all of that is, is, is really powerful. But the core mission is really the thing. And it's definitely not limited to credit card better alternatives, not limited to purchasing financial products are stressful. Like I was trying to find a way to come up with a tagline for Affirm over the years and I sort of settled in on this notion.

Austin Hankwitz (34:59)

That you use a firm when it.

Max Levchin (35:00)

Matters to you and of course money just matters all the time. And for, you know, rich or poor and you know, apropos the name of the podcast, people don't like thinking about money because it feels stressful. If you have a lot, you need to put it to work and you don't know where to go, you don't want to lose it. If you have very little, you're stressed. We're going to get the next paycheck, how are you going to afford the next thing? How are you going to feed your family? But there's not a happy Zen moment thinking about money for just about anyone. And that isn't how it should be. You should be able to say I feel great, I feel abundant. I feel like my goals are being met. I know how I'm going to plan my next financial move. I will get where I need to go with my financial goals in time. I'm not going to run out of money. I'm not going to feel like I'm under deploying my money. And that is sort of the happy vision for the long term. Affirm. We want to be there for you, making you feel great about your money instead of stressed.

Austin Hankwitz (35:49)

Now, before we ask Max our final question, gotta give a shout out to public.com, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index using AI.

Robert Kroke (36:09)

And it all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year. You can literally type any prompt and let the AI do the work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500, all with just a few clicks.

Austin Hankwitz (36:30)

Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities. They're completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com rich habits and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com rich habits paid for by Public Investing.

Robert Kroke (36:51)

Full disclosure in the podcast description.

Austin Hankwitz (36:53)

All right, Robert, let's now wrap up our interview with Max.

Robert Kroke (36:56)

You've spent your career at the intersection of computer science, mathematics and consumer finance. So what advances in those specific fields are enabling the next evolution of consumer financial products that simply weren't possible before. Now that we have AI and what's being built right now, that's blowing your mind.

Max Levchin (37:16)

So I think the obviously AI sort of it's almost impossible to overlook at this point. And AI, by the way, is a very squishy term. I enjoy beating up on the very squishiness parts of it because, you know, it used to mean one thing and now it means another, but sort of slightly more formally statistical learning, which is what Affirm was built on with our superior underwriting system, is what allowed us to very quickly, without human involvement, make decisions on whether something's a good financial.

Austin Hankwitz (37:43)

Decision or bad financial decision.

Max Levchin (37:45)

Make it cheaper for you, make it easier to access all of that. And so that's been our go to for a very long time and we continue to see incredible results. The ability to put that into human language with large language models and kind of the newer flavor of what, you know, people are now calling artificial intelligence is really powerful because it takes a lot of the But I still don't understand or help me navigate this change or what do I do next? Out of the hands of humans who are busy and sometimes have bad days and sometimes can be frustrated or not understand you, and puts it in the hands of a machine that can be designed to always be thoughtful and there's always going to be human in the very core of the system because we're not yet at a place where AI will develop its own personality and its own sense of taste and fairness. And so you have to have humans involved. But being able to just give access to easy to understand, easy to communicate in language of your choice with the metaphors of your choice for every human on earth as they access money, I think is going to be very, very powerful. And so I'm very excited about LLMs and natural interfaces. And we're probably going to go through a bunch of iterations on that and we'll be there for it. But just being able to talk to your money is a profoundly important idea that just wasn't possible five years ago and is now absolutely possible.

Austin Hankwitz (39:03)

That is fascinating. And I'm so grateful that there are people on this earth like you who are building and doing, doing the good work of like helping people understand and have that healthy relationship with money. Right? Have that. I don't understand this. Why, why did I not have the ability to make this, you know, why can't I do like, well, here's why. Here's the cash flow, here's your pay. Like all this stuff. I think that's so, so powerful. Max, again, incredible conversation, my friend. Thank you so much for joining us. Your focus on transparency, incentive alignment and responsible credit really challenges how people think about money. And we all know our audience is going to walk away from this episode seeing credit through a much more thoughtful lens. So if people want to learn more about Affirm, follow you specifically probably recommend LinkedIn. But where can people learn about Affirm and what you're up to and the products that you're shipping on what's prob.

Max Levchin (39:53)

Weekly basis at this point, it's all accelerating. Definitely find me on LinkedIn. I'm there with sort of longer form disquisitions on what I think matters. I'm fairly active on Twitter, although in my copious spare time I have at least two other passions that I'm constantly talking about and that's road cycling and coffee. So be ready for some unhealthy dose of those two topics right next to consumer finance and computer science. But Mlevchin on Twitter, I think I'm Left in on LinkedIn. Firm on Twitter is the official channel. That's where we, we talk about. Just today we announced that we are adding more than 10% more approvals, we think with a deeper cut at cash flow, underwriting, using AI like super excited about that one. And so if you, you heard it here, but you could have heard it there first. So follow us on social media. We're just as transparent there as we are in our business.

Austin Hankwitz (40:43)

Thank you so much, Max. We really appreciate your time. Can't wait to have you back. Thank you, Robert. That was our third conversation with a billionaire on the Rich Habits podcast, which is mind boggling to think right? Harley Finkelstein. Then we had Reid Hoffman and now we've had Max Levchin, which Reid and Max Both co founded PayPal and now they're on the Rich Habits podcast which is so fun. But dude, I just, I, I feel like talking to billionaires and people that are building businesses. I mean a firm right now is a $25 billion business. It was probably 50, 60, 100 billion back when it get IPO'd. But it's just, I feel like I get so excited, right? It just, it's so inspiring to see how one thing, one instance in this man's life not being able to buy that Mercedes Benz after selling PayPal, getting probably 30, 50, a hundred million dollars deposited to whatever investment accounts he had after the acquisition of PayPal to eBay and being like, wait, what? I can't do this. Okay, cool, I'm just gonna go disrupt the legacy credit card system in response. Like, it's just, it's so cool how these people think and I'm so grateful to be have incredible people like Max Levchin on the Rich Habits podcast.

Robert Kroke (41:49)

Yeah, I mean, let's look at it from the audience perspective. We bring on these absolute rock stars, these billionaires and multi billionaires and people that have built meaningful household name companies. And that's what makes the Rich Habits podcast so special and different is, you know, a lot of people bring on famous people to their podcast, but we're here to bring as much financial and business value as possible. So having these conversations to me is just the coolest thing I've ever gotten to do in my career to do this with you each and every week. So what a great episode. And I feel like I could just run through a wall right now. It's so crazy.

Austin Hankwitz (42:27)

I will say too, and after having an honest conversation with Max about how a firm works and what they don't do and what they do and like how just how they're underwriting these transactions one by one like that. It's just, I'm, of course I'm never going to encourage someone to take on, you know, high interest debt. And I guess theoretically affirm. I guess it depends on the implied interest rate of your loan. Right. But it's like after this conversation, I'm no longer bucketing buy now, pay later. Specifically affirm. I can't talk toward Klarna or these other ones because, right. They talked about you know, no late fees and 0% and all this stuff, but I'm no longer going to be bucketing a firm in the same conversation with credit card debt. They're just, they're doing something completely different. And I really think they're fighting the good fight and they're trying to provide credit and assistance to people that need credit whenever they can in a very non predatory manner. I think credit cards are predatory. I agree. Like, you know, he signed up for his first credit card. He probably got a slice of pizza. Hey, sign up for this credit card, give you some free pizza, right? It's like, and then he got bamboozled and owed 600 bucks because they weren't transparent. And so it seems like a firm's fighting the good fight. And I really want to encourage our audience to think about a firm. Again, I can't talk to these other buy now, pay later companies because I don't know, you know, I think he mentioned that they, they started with the no late fees, no interest, and then other people have kind of followed suit. So again, affirm specifically, I'm, I'm no longer looking at them as any sort of like, you know, predatory credit card anything. And it's, they're fighting the good fight. And I want to encourage our audience to think the same.

Robert Kroke (43:57)

Definitely I am of the same ilk now after that conversation and totally different world and totally different opinion from me as well on a firm moving forward.

Austin Hankwitz (44:07)

Forward. And again, Affirm's not paying us a dime to say that. Affirm. Like we literally, like this was a, hey, I wonder if we can get the CEO of a firm on our show. And we did, like, that's how this is. So I don't want you guys to think we're over here just getting bought and sold by anyone that's throwing us cash to be on the show or whatever. It's like this was our doing because we've had so much headline news and interest and phantom debt by now, like, whatever's going on. And I think this was a really cool way for us to better understand how companies specifically affirm in the buy now, pay later space are operating and what they do differently than legacy credit card issuers. So, Robert, let's now jump into the Q and A section of the show. Our first question comes from Sanjay P. On Instagram. Sanjay says, hi, Robert Noston, longtime listener from Canada. I love your show and I've been sharing it with my friends and family. Sanjay, thank you so much for sharing the episodes with your friends and family. That's what we ask everyone to do if you enjoy the show. Sanjay says, I got a quick question. My spouse and I are 40 years old. $700,000 in a Self Managed Retirement Investment Accounts, RRSPs and TFS FAS. We have 800,000 in equity in our principal residence. We also have an investment property that is positive cash flow and about $500,000 of equity in that investment property. Oh my goodness. Sanjay says, my question is we have three young kids and life is Getting expensive. To help with monthly cash flow from extracurriculars and trips. What do you think about taking a hundred thousand of the TFSA money, investing it into Canadian dividend ETFs so I can start generating a thousand dollars per month? I'm trying to balance living in the moment while the kids are young versus retirement. This is a really good question. How I understand this is like you're trying to take money out of a retirement account to then invest it in such a way, call it NEOS funds, that it's going to spit off a thousand dollars a month in distributions so that you can then support these extracurricular activities and trips you want to take with your, with your family. In my humble opinion, I would not cash out a retirement account. Instead, I would consider selling the investment Property that has $500,000 of equity in it. If you sold that investment property, let's say that $500,000 of equity now is yours, and you took maybe 1, 2 or 300,000 of that, parked it into NEOS funds or some sort of, you know, high income tax efficient dividend focused ETF in Canada, spit out one to three thousand dollars a month in distributions. I think that is a much better approach. And now you've got this 200,000 that you can invest into the self. Yeah. Why don't you do this? Why don't you take 300,000 of this 500,000, put it in a taxable brokerage account. So now you have 300,000 invested over here, 700,000 invested in your retirement accounts, totaling $1 million now invested in the stock market growing for you. Stock market went up 20%. Right. Nasdaq was a 20 return in 2025. The other 200,000 of the 500 can now go toward these dividend focused ETFs to come up with another one or $2,000 a month, depending on what you do. But it sounds to me, and Robert, this is what I want you to talk about. It sounds to me like you're trying to borrow from Peter to pay Paul in a sense that maybe if you did a really detailed budget or maybe you pulled back on, you know, the frivolous spending over here. Maybe you're just a little bit more intentional with your money. You could find that extra $1,000 a month that you're trying to come up with.

Robert Kroke (47:41)

Yeah. To me, my brain automatically goes to when I hear a scenario like this. Are you trying to decrease depletion or increase cash flow? That's where my brain goes. Because in this instance, you already have a lot of money working for you, and I don't know that taking money and possibly paying penalties from these TFSAs makes sense to then move into a dividend ETF that may not give you all the returns that you desire. So I think Austin's play is the best play because at this point, I feel like you're doing exactly that. Robbing Peter to pay Paul. I would reevaluate, decide what you need. Do you want growth more or depletion less or both? And how to achieve that, given what Austin laid out, I think is the best plan.

Austin Hankwitz (48:27)

I mean, you're 40 years old, right? I'm assuming your spouse is likely staying at home with the kids and you are out, you know, doing your career, earning money, putting money aside and making sure that you guys are kind of living life here. So maybe there's a. Another career play, right? Maybe there's a path, earning more money as well as on top of these investments. So there's a couple ways to think about this. But before you make any drastic changes, my biggest piece of advice for you is to really lay out that honest, detailed budget. Understand where your money's going, and maybe you find $600 a month that was bleeding into other things. Oh, I got. I got this money. Now I'm capturing it and being more intentional with my spending. And I really only need 400, which means maybe I just work one weekend at this job or I drive Uber for three days a week for the. Maybe you don't have to do a drastic change like selling an investment property, pulling money out of retirement, like doing the things that you're alluding to here, Sanjay. So really great situation to be in. I think you got some flexibility, you got some options, and we're rooting for you, my friend. Our next question comes from OT on Instagram. OT says, hi, Robert and Austin. I'm a big follower and I've been following you guys since April of 2023. I've done everything you've suggested, but with all of the headline news now that the US Is going to collapse because of debt, I'm concerned if it continues to make sense to keep putting money toward US Stocks and equities. Or should I be thinking of something else?

Robert Kroke (49:49)

Huh?

Austin Hankwitz (49:50)

Okay, Robert, what do you think about this one?

Robert Kroke (49:52)

I'm always going to be a buyer of US Equities. We talk about this all the time. I think I would not worry so much about the headlines. And if you haven't joined the Rich Habits Network and you're worried about this Headline. Now is the time to join because as we always say, if you're surprised by the stock market, we're not doing a good enough job. So for me, I'm always a player in the US Markets. Can you have some international flair? Yes. Do I see a world where we're going to have this big meltdown in the US Stock market and equity markets and maybe even real estate? I don't see that happening. So I'm not going to flee into cash anytime soon. But again, that's my opinion and that's what I would do.

Austin Hankwitz (50:32)

So what are your thoughts on the current, call it debt situation with the.

Robert Kroke (50:36)

U.S. yeah, we talked about this last night in the weekly livestream and that is, you know, we have this K shaped economy. So I think there is kind of two worlds here. There is the haves and the have nots and the people that have all the wealth, they're not as affected by the debt as other people are that are living paycheck to paycheck. And so that's why this entire episode is so important. So for me, yes, there are definitely problems with debt, both from a consumer standpoint, but also the U.S. government. So I'm not as concerned with it on a day to day or anytime soon in the next few months, but it's definitely something we need to keep an eye on. But I don't think we're at any situation right now where we have to worry about seeing a total collapse in the US Markets.

Austin Hankwitz (51:20)

I don't think we are either. But I will caveat that with we are on an unsustainable path as a country of borrowing. And you know, we just saw what's going on and being proposed in, in California with this like billionaires tax. And well one, it's caused I think, you know, 2 trillion or whatever dollars worth of wealth now to leave California because they don't want to go pay this tax which from I guess a lot of other taxes that they probably were paying during that period of time. So it was kind of counterintuitive. But on the same token it's like we've seen a lot of headlines and ideas on let's just tax more. Let's, let's do these things to generate more wealth for the US Government from a revenue perspective. But then we're sort of simultaneously ignoring that we're borrowing trillions of dollars a year and there's, I mean we've seen what's going on with fraud and these sort of of, you know, activist journal and journalist investigations with fraud Right. So it's like, it's not even that we're borrowing so much, but also there's like clear instances of fraud for the money that is being taken in as revenue. So it's like this really weird catch 22 where I feel like the average American is explicitly trying to avoid, to pay taxes because one, they think, well, I'm never going to see this again. It's like Social Security, right? It's like never going to see this again. It's on a runaway train. And what I do get, you know, goes into this system as revenue for the, for the US Government gets paid out to people in fraud, which doesn't make sense to me. So, like, they're kind of bucking the system system in that sense. It's a really peculiar place to be and it's not a healthy place to be as a, as a country. And so, no, I don't think it's going to cause the, the big, you know, collapse that you might be thinking about ot. But I certainly don't see it as a sustainable path. And we must, as a country, figure out how we're going to move forward. And I will die on the Hill. That taxation, in my humble opinion, no matter if it's a billionaire, millionaire, whatever. Remember when federal income tax started, it was only taxing the top 1% of earners. Now every single person in America pays federal income tax, right? They might start in California with these billionaires with this private property seizure, but it just, you know, oh, now it's people with a hundred million. Now it's people with 10 million. Well, now it's people with 5 million. Oh, if you have over 500k, now you got to pay your fair share. So it's like it's just a slippery slope of taxation and I would much rather find a solution from the expenses side of it. Going into so much debt, having all this money flow out of the US from a, you know, on the balance sheet from the expenses side than trying to solve for the revenue side, which is taxation.

Robert Kroke (53:41)

I think that's a great takeaway. And for me, it's all about, you know, and it kind of got touched on some with the whole Doge thing. And Elon Musk is getting our government to be more accountable and efficient so then people can have more trust in why they're paying taxes and why we're in the boat that we're in. That's where I'd like to see it start. Because right now, when we hear about all this fraud in Minnesota and other States. States where these people are getting millions and millions of dollars off of taxpayer money and they're not even performing what they claim they were performing as a service. To me, it all starts with efficiency and really cracking down on the expenses, more so than what the government's borrowing.

Austin Hankwitz (54:22)

So our next question comes from NIHA on Instagram. NIHA says even with schedule flexibility, I'm exhausted juggling shift work in real estate. I have a government pension, a $40,000 car loan at five and a half percent and very little invested in the stock market, only about $6,000. My goal is to eventually quit one job, keep my other job, avoid burnout, and still be financially free. So my question is, have I over complicated my life by going all in on real estate too quickly? Should I pause and aggressively pay down debt or start diversifying into the stock market so I can build real freedom instead of just accumulating more properties? Thank you. I would really appreciate your honest take. So you mentioned going all in on real estate. I don't see too much of, like, what that means in this situation, but I'm going to try and read between the lines here. So you're probably in your 30s or 40s, you've got a $40,000 car loan, you're working several jobs, you're juggling shift work in real estate, and you're just like, listen, I'm getting burnt out. In my humble opinion, I think there's like three milestones of building wealth. The first milestone is I'm gonna get a job. I'm gonna, you know, as to what we just talked about with Max, use credit to get a better education, transportation to my work, great things like that, owning a home, right? I'm gonna get a job and do the normal things that I'm supposed to do once that's done. And you're implementing rich habits to ensure that you're not going into high interest, credit card debt, you're investing consistently, you are trending in the right direction. Then I think you hit milestone too. This kind of happens after you've built your base. We kind of like make that the, the sort of the check mark here, which is now I'm gonna start to get a little bit fancier.

Max Levchin (56:03)

Right?

Austin Hankwitz (56:03)

And Robert talks about using this as an opportunity to diversify into real estate, small business ownership. Maybe there's other things you can do to speed up your wealth building process. And then number three is like people like Max who just like make big businesses and they just scale in perpetuity and they're like, like huge Billionaires, Right. I'm very much in number two. Robert's very much in number two. And I think a lot of people can get to number two if they do it in order.

Max Levchin (56:27)

Right.

Austin Hankwitz (56:27)

One, two, three. It seems to me, Neha, that you just jumped to number two and you said, I'm going all in on real estate. I'm going to work as many jobs as I can. I'm going to take on this car loan. I'm going to go not invest in the stock market. I'm going to do whatever. Seems to me like you need to get back to basics. Right? And so getting back to basics in this situation might mean getting rid of the $40,000 car because you can't afford an $892 a month payment. Maybe getting back to this means you're working two jobs, but the second job you're working at, you're only making 12 bucks an hour and that Chipotle is paying $18 an hour with the opportunity to make 24 as a manager. And so like, maybe there's a different way that you can optimize your earning, optimize your expenses so you can find that true. 12, 15, 18, 20% of margin in your budget every single month to start paying down any high interest debt. You might have to start building that emergency fund. So there's a little bit of breathing you between you and life maybe to start investing in the stock market, get that base business built instead of going all around with these crazy things and the real estate. So for me, I would try and get back to basics if I were in your shoes. Maybe that means selling some of these. I don't know what properties you have. You didn't mention that, but maybe it means selling some properties.

Robert Kroke (57:34)

Yeah, I think that's a great breakdown. And always remember Niha and anyone else listening when you turn in a question to us, always give us the details and at least include your age and a little bit more about each element of the question because then that way we can better answer. But Austin, I think your takeaway was great. Keep it simple, get moving forward and get more money invested, not necessarily in real estate, but just overall, and then go from there.

Austin Hankwitz (58:01)

So when do you think is the right time for someone who wants to start diversifying into real estate? We talked about the hundred thousand dollars, like, you know, getting that base built, things like that. But you know what's like, things that need to get taken care of before you even think about diversifying into real estate.

Robert Kroke (58:17)

What an incredible question. I think too many people put the cart ahead of the horse. They want to go buy property right out of the gate because someone told them they're going to get rich in real estate. And I agree totally. I think people should have their Roth IRA set up and maxed out every year. I think people should build towards their base of that hundred thousand dollars we talk about first, because here's the scenario that happens time and time again. Someone gets their first $25,000 together. They go buy a house, they go buy a duplex. They're going to fix it up with a buddy or they're going to fix it up with their boyfriend or their girlfriend. They go broke, it costs more, it takes too long. They end up losing money and they're starting over at zero again. We do not want to see anyone go back to zero in the Rich Habits Podcast or the Rich Habits Network. So to me, get the base built of the $100,000 saved and invested. Make sure that includes having your Roth IRA set up and fully maxed out. Note and make sure you don't have a ton of credit card debt sitting on the sideline while you're trying to maximize your earnings through real estate. But meanwhile you're losing money on these 25 and 30% credit card debts. That's what I would do. Those are the three steps before you ever think about signing for a piece of real estate.

Austin Hankwitz (59:32)

Bingo Bango. Heard it here first, everybody. Thank you so much for joining us on this week's episode of the Rich Habits Podcast. And again, major shout out to Max Levchin for taking the time to chat with us today and educate us as to what he's building with with Affirm. If you like interviews like this, be sure to come back to the Rich Habits Podcast because we're going to have a ton more of them in 2026, as well as just the consistent, awesome content. Again, as a reminder, these are our Monday episodes, so if you're new around here, we have these Monday flagship Evergreen Financial Concept Interview episodes. Thursdays are our Q and A episodes. If you want to ask us a question like the ones we just answered here, email us at rich habits podcastmail.com or DM us on Instagram at Rich Habits Podcast. And finally, they're back. Those Friday episodes, we were gone for a couple weeks because of Christmas and New Year's here, but we're back and they're every Friday morning bringing you the biggest headlines and happenings impacting you and your money. That's the weekly breakdown. We're so grateful that so many tens of thousands of you come back every single week to listen to the show. And as a reminder, too, don't forget to check out the Rich Habits Network, the Rich Habits newsletter, all of the tools and downloads in the show notes below. And also we'll link out a couple things that Max mentioned. I think we'll link out his Twitter affirm, stuff like that that he was talking about in the inter you.

Robert Kroke (60:44)

And if you get a ton of value from these shows, make sure to share it with a family friend, some of you, somebody at work maybe, and just really get the message out there because everyone needs a little nudge in the right direction when it comes to mindset, business and finance. And we're here to provide that.

Austin Hankwitz (61:00)

Thanks everyone, and we'll see you on Thursday.

Max Levchin (61:10)

Sa.