3d:I[58016,["/_next/static/chunks/0jjo8hz~ewue4.js","/_next/static/chunks/0abq8zp15pmva.js","/_next/static/chunks/05gz47kazl1ze.js","/_next/static/chunks/139o5utivfajl.js","/_next/static/chunks/0a~e7k..h6jfc.js","/_next/static/chunks/0d1e9m2ig9v3v.js","/_next/static/chunks/0fg30bidui1gn.js","/_next/static/chunks/0rizq9ux3s1w3.js","/_next/static/chunks/0bbc2ioe2xmkf.js","/_next/static/chunks/0z7avafhgjcyr.js"],"ProcessEpisodeButton"] 40:I[45269,["/_next/static/chunks/0jjo8hz~ewue4.js","/_next/static/chunks/0abq8zp15pmva.js","/_next/static/chunks/05gz47kazl1ze.js","/_next/static/chunks/139o5utivfajl.js","/_next/static/chunks/0a~e7k..h6jfc.js","/_next/static/chunks/0d1e9m2ig9v3v.js","/_next/static/chunks/0fg30bidui1gn.js","/_next/static/chunks/0rizq9ux3s1w3.js","/_next/static/chunks/0bbc2ioe2xmkf.js","/_next/static/chunks/0z7avafhgjcyr.js"],"SignupCTA"] 35:["$","svg",null,{"className":"w-4 h-4","fill":"none","stroke":"currentColor","viewBox":"0 0 24 24","children":["$","path",null,{"strokeLinecap":"round","strokeLinejoin":"round","strokeWidth":2,"d":"M8 7V3m8 4V3m-9 8h10M5 21h14a2 2 0 002-2V7a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v12a2 2 0 002 2z"}]}] 36:["$","time",null,{"dateTime":"2024-03-28T13:00:00.000Z","children":"Thu Mar 28 2024"}] 37:["$","p",null,{"className":"text-base text-foreground/80 leading-relaxed","children":"Troutman Pepper Partner Cal Stein discusses RICO cases that are brought both against individuals involved in racketeering activity, as well as their employers, under a theory of vicarious liability or respondeat superior."}] 3e:T4ee,

Join Troutman Pepper White Collar and Litigation Partner Cal Stein for a special podcast series, discussing the legal landscape surrounding the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

In this installment, Cal discusses RICO cases that are brought both against individuals involved in racketeering activity, as well as their employers, under a theory of vicarious liability or respondeat superior. Specific topics include:

General criteria for vicarious liability (2:20);
Policy arguments for vicarious liability in the RICO context (5:41);
Vicarious liability for Section 1962(c) RICO claims (7:58);
Vicarious liability for Section1962(a) and Section1962(b) claims (11:22);
Vicarious liability for Section1962(d) claims (13:52);
Congressional failure to clarify vicarious liability for RICO claims (14:29); and
Using vicarious liability arguments to dismiss RICO claims (17:45).

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

RICO Vicarious Liability