Transcript
Vasco (0:04)
Hey there, agile adventurer, just a quick question. What if, for the price of a fancy coffee or half a pizza, you could unlock over 700 hours of the best agile content on the planet? That's audio, video, E courses, books, presentations, all that you can think of. But you can also join live calls with world class practitioners and hang out in a flame war free and AI slop clean slack with the sharpest minds in the game. Oh, and yes, you get direct access to me, Vasko, your Scrum Master Toolbox podcast. No, this is not a drill. It's this Scrum Master Toolbox membership. And it's your unfair advantage in the agile world. So if you want to know more, go check out scrummastertoolbox.org membership, that's scrummastertoolbox.org Membership. And check out all the goodies we have for you. Do it now. But if you're not doing it now, let's listen to the podcast.
Bernard (1:11)
Hello everybody. Welcome to our Wednesday the Change Leadership episode, this week with Bernard Agreste. Hey Bernard, welcome back.
Bernard Agreste (1:19)
Hey Vasco, how are you?
Bernard (1:21)
So, Bernard, Wednesday is the Change Leadership episode. So we want to explore one of those stories of change. So tell us the story, a bit of the context, what kind of change process was it, and then walk us through the steps from beginning to end how that process went. And as you go, highlight for us the tools, the tips, the tricks and the techniques you learned back then that you still apply today.
Bernard Agreste (1:46)
Yeah, absolutely. So one of the biggest challenges I faced, and this was a massive change initiative, a digital transformation effort, an internal tool that supported at Teach for America, our staff, but then also about 2 to 300 teachers every year, 23 school districts, and kind of indirectly touched something like 12 to 15,000 students every year. Also touched all of our internal ways of working. So onboarding, hiring, partner coordination, program, metrics, you name it, the tool touched it. And it was a very old school. So it had so much tech debt that we were just duct taping new features onto it. But it needed a rebuild. Right? We were being billed by developers a lot more, but really we were being built because they were making up for unclear requirements and a tool that wasn't built for what we needed it to do anymore. Our organization just evolved and so there was alignment that it needed to be rebuilt, but nobody could agree on where to start. And to be clear, this was not a turf war. This wasn't like, oh, my thing needs to go first. It was genuine disagreement and confusion over how can we do this so that the disruption to, to kids, school staff would be as minimized as possible within the workflow that we had. And so the thing that I did to start was had a one on one with everyone to understand how they thought of the workflow itself. And then in my own role, being the PMO supporter for everyone else, I realized that teams weren't actually viewing their work as cyclical flows, but more as straight lines of like almost like a race where I pass a baton off to the next person and then that's it. But like they don't realize that it's not like this, it's like this. And so what I did was I actually mapped out the continuum of our year across teams. And what I highlighted was not just where teams responsibilities were kind of front and center of the work, but also all the other teams that were supporting them so that work could get finished. And they were, and where those teams were most proximate. So in mapping out this full continuum for the year and seeing where roles overlapped, there was a very clear pattern. And it was that the onboarding team wasn't just a starting point. It wasn't just like, oh, we take the baton. The onboarding team was the, was the team that gave the baton to everyone all the time. They were involved in every cycle, every phase, and then they had their own core work to do as well. And so they were propping up so much other, so many other teams that starting the rebuild from them actually allowed us to redesign with impact in mind. And so we weren't just redesigning for features. We were now redesigning so that the tech worked for us in a way that onboarding had figured out would make everybody's lives easier.
