
Loading summary
A
Foreign.
B
Welcome to Sharp, China. I'm Andrew Sharp and you are listening to a free preview of today's episode.
A
Hello and welcome back to another episode of Sharp, China. I'm Andrew Sharp and on the other line, Bill Bishop. Bill, how you doing?
C
Hola, everyone. I'm doing well. I think we, you know, it looks like it's going to be Spain and maybe Argentina, so we all got to practice our Spanish.
A
There we go. I was like, did he just say Ola? Okay, Spain, Argentina. I'm not ready to concede anything to Argentina. I'm officially pulling for England.
C
I'm neutral now. I just gotta say, I mean, it's messy. Come on. Between Messi and FIFA, the odds. The odds are not. Well, that's true. Yeah.
A
Bet on like five red cards for the England team later this afternoon. I wish these games weren't being played at 3 o' clock in the afternoon. That's one World cup take. Take. Because it's hard. It feels like less of an event in the middle of the day. But FIFA wants the European audience in
C
the midst of all this, which is fair.
A
It is, but we're hosting it. You know, you should be catering to the American audience when it's in Europe or the Middle east. I think 2030 is the Middle East. No, 2034 is the Middle East. It will be played in primetime in those countries. That would be my guess. Anyways. In any event, I look forward to the World cup final. Whoever the second team is. Does look like Spain's probably the team to beat at this point. Really, really impressive against boring.
C
But yeah. So we're recording at 11am Eastern time on Wednesday. So the second semifinal is what, in four hours?
A
Right? It will be set by the time you are listening to this podcast. We will begin not with soccer, but with Reuters, who wrote Wednesday China's economy expanded at its slowest pace in more than three years in the second quarter. Missing forecasts with weak household consumption clouding strong manufacturing and exports and intensifying concerns over the long term sustainability of its unbalanced growth model at 4.3%. Second quarter GDP growth eased from the first quarter's 5%, landing below the lower end of China's 4.5% to 5% full year target. The data adds pressure on Beijing to deliver more stimulus. But many analysts say a closely watched end of July meeting of the Communist Party's Politburo may not flag major steps due to concerns over ballooning debt. Jane Ho, who runs a European goods importing business in eastern China, says her income has Roughly halved since the beginning of the year as her firm sales have dropped. An apartment she rents out has been without a tenant for more than six months, a reflection of China's huge housing oversupply and prolonged property crisis. So a lot of information there and some specific anecdote at the end of that Reuters report. The data is not good. What will you be watching over the next few weeks and maybe months as the system responds to the status quo?
C
No, the data, the data is not great. The range they g. The target range for GDP growth this year was 4.5 to 5%. So they're still within that for the first half, they're in that range. But if they continue at 4.3%, obviously then they, for the rest of the year they won't be so. But is the data that dire that they're suddenly going to roll out what so many continue to hope for?
A
Stimulus, probably from the Grin and Barrett approach of the last.
C
A lot of this, I think, is within the range of what they can tolerate, especially given the turmoil that's coming from the war in the Middle East. Earlier this week, at the end of July, there's the Politburo meeting. And that Politburo meeting is usually to sum up the recent economic activity and provide any additional tweaks to planning for the balance of the. Of the year and, or at least the next quarter. And on Monday, Li Chang, you know, they, he'll meet with experts on Monday, he met with academic experts, economists and some entrepreneurs. And one of the lines in the readout was that, you know, generally it's off to a good start. You know, obviously there are some challenges. They're very aware and they talk about some of the challenges. One of the things he said was countercyclical adjustment must be stepped up and existing. So there may be some marginal sort of more forcible policies coming by. I guess it would be end of next week or early the week after.
A
Yeah, two weeks.
C
But I don't think this print sort of materially changes the trajectory of their current policies. And so I think that people who are following closely, I don't think were particularly surprised. So, you know, they're just going to
A
kind of grind it along, expect more of the same from the party. And when we look at the data, the consumption remains weak. The property market remains a complete mess. High Tech manufacturing expanded 13.3%. Equipment manufacturing 9.3%. Digital product manufacturing 12.3%. Integrated circuit production rose 23.1%. Lithium battery output 39.3%. Robot production 28%.
C
So I mean, so they can robot production, they can point to the parts of the, you know, the new quality productive forces, parts of the economy that are doing well. And they can point to the trade data from yesterday where exports are booming, especially around, you know, just the high tech, some of the high tech related exports. And so again, it's not all doom and gloomy. And I think from the policymaker, they're like, okay, you know, again, it's within the range. You know, retail sales were low, but they were actually, I think they came in at 1% a little better than expected. And then they're talking up and they're pushing this idea of services, retail sales, and those were stronger. And so again, I think you can, you know, you can look at it and say, oh my God, you know, the sky's fallen out, falling down. But in reality, I think from the perspective of the policymakers, they're like, it's not great, but it's not, it's not terrible.
A
And you know, we're going to, it's not necessarily dying.
C
We can tweak here and there. I mean, on the trade side, I mean if there were, you know, they need the exports, the export engine is, is propping up a lot of growth. And so that's why, you know, it's
A
carrying everything right now. And a lot of it's high tech and AI driven, just like America's economic growth has been over the last couple of years.
C
So you know, it's one of the reasons they're so focused on blunting any EU efforts to impose more tariffs or trade barriers. And yeah, in an auto. And the auto autos were the auto market in China, the domestic market is down. The, you know, they got rid of subsidies, they pulled forward a bunch of demand, they pulled back on the subsidies. And so of course the domestic market's going down, but the export market is taking over. Right. It's filling the gap in a lot of ways.
A
That story continues to be absolutely incredible to me. I'll read this tweet from Michael Dunn. Never before in 100 years of the automobile industry has one country's exports exploded like this. Chinese car exports 20201 million exports 2020 to 3.1 million exports 2024 7.9 million exports 202612 million exports Japan's highest export number ever was 6 million 12 million is more than America's annual production of cars. Global car demand throughout this period has been flat. So Chinese exports the gain is others pain. That's done's characterization. Volkswagen of course, plans to lay off up to 100,000 employees as sales tank. And in the domestic market, you mentioned the drop and the subsidies. The domestic market for Automobiles is down 20% year over year. BYD still leads the domestic market, but their sales domestically are down 45.9%, which is just a staggering number. How does subsidies play into that story? And the drop that we're seeing, you
C
saw in the US when they had like, the ev, you know, the EV credits and tax breaks. It's just the cars are cheaper, so people are going to buy while they're the. While they're the various subsidies or various, you know, sort of brakes to get the car cheaper. And then once you pull them off, one, they don't look like a good deal anymore. And two, you most likely have pulled a lot of the demand forward. There were a couple interesting articles in the Chinese press yesterday from Yitai. One was that the sales of used cars in China approached those of new vehicles for the first time ever in the first five months of the year, which again, I think is a sign that, okay, the new cars aren't. The subsidies are gone, used cars are a little cheaper. That is maybe a reflection of the state of some of the consumers. The other was that they talked about, like, BYD is launching one of its new models overseas first. And they went into how several companies now, these PRC automakers are now launching their overseas models first because as a, as an industry association executive had said, sometimes they can charge at least three times higher overseas than in China. Right. So you're. So you have this massive involution problem in China where even when they are making the sales, the margins are low, but then you can turn around and sell them overseas. And even with the shipping costs and some tariffs, you still make a ton more money because you can charge more in the other markets. And so, I mean, that is so
A
the path to salvation, again, is all export.
C
So one of the ways to fight involution is to export away from it. Right. And then that is certainly, I think, something that the policymakers and other markets that are concerned about, say, EU or Germany is concerned about its auto industry. They probably should be paying a lot of attention to the fact that these guys can charge a lot more outside in Germany, say, than in China because of the market dynamics. That doesn't seem great.
A
No kidding. Well, and it really, it's such a fascinating historical moment because obviously Dunn refers back to Japan and the surge In Japanese exports 25, 30 years ago, or I guess now 40 years ago. this point, we're all getting old. Um, but it. Right now, you look at China and it's like two completely different economies. The domestic economy is a mess and seems to be contracting in all.
C
Again, again, it's a mess. It's not. I would say it's not great. It's also not collapsing. Yeah, it's messy, I would call it.
A
Okay, fair enough. Messy and not necessarily trending in positive directions as we sit here recording.
C
Certainly large parts of the economy are not trending and large parts are not trending in positive direction. Some parts are.
A
Right. But then on the other hand, you have this manufacturing powerhouse that is continuing to eat sector after sector after sector and is exporting out unemployment issues to the rest of the world. And all of it is happening in plain sight. And it's going to be interesting to see whether countries have the mettle to respond to any of this. Because, like the export numbers, I mean, Germany's export numbers in June were insane. You published them on cynicism earlier in the week here. And the numbers to Germany have been insane consistently for years now. And now I guess the question is whether any of these markets actually respond.
C
Well, it's political. It's political will. And it's also that the Chinese have built up a pretty effective toolkit to respond or reciprocate.
A
Yeah.
C
So, you know, the eu, for example, they can talk tough and all about all the things they want to do to deal with, you know, what, currency manipulation, structural problems, but then the Chinese
A
can cut off, reverse, and it is a structural problem. It's just very clear that the PRC either can't or won't restructure what's happening here. Like, there's been no.
C
Why would they. It's working, but it's, it's, it's working for them.
A
Yeah, that's true.
C
I mean, I think, I think at least from the, again, from the perspective of the top leadership, I think they think it's working for them.
A
Yeah. And is it working for everyday Chinese people is a separate question, but that is clearly not necessarily animating the decision making.
C
So. So we'll see. I mean, there was a quote, I think the Sasha Modi Post quoted the Deputy Director General for Trade in Europe, Dennis Redonnet. Sorry if I pronounce your name wrong. That they may need to undertake safeguarding measures like tariffs and quotas against sudden import surges because structural rebalancing will not take place before October. And I just said, I mean, structural rebalancing is not going to take place. After October either.
A
I know that you withering commentary no,
C
but, but I mean the EU like they pinned on this we're going to keep talking till October. We're going to we're punt. And then in October, somehow, magically maybe they'll, you know, Chancellor Mertz from Germany is keeps talking about the PRC doing the some dramatic revaluation of their M and B. I mean they're in fantasy land.
A
No kidding. They are in fantasy land. And your commentary and I believe Tuesday's newsletter was terrific because you did just add there's not going to be restructuring or structural changes after October either. And Mertz, he's talking about a deal with China and continues to there's probably not going to be a deal with China that resolves any of this. And Europe is going to have to take care of its own side of the street and protect its industries. And if that were to happen, then the economic picture gets a lot more complicated for Chinese exporters who are currently sustaining the economy. One other question here. While we're talking about the economy, all this reporting, including this Reuters report, it always mentions the property crisis and the prolonged kind of downturn there. At what point it's been five years of falling housing prices. At what point should we stop describing that as a crisis or a downturn and just treat it as a permanent structural change?
B
All right, and that is the end of the free preview. If you'd like to hear the rest of today's conversation and get access to full episodes of Sharp China each week, you can go to your Show Notes and subscribe to either Bill's newsletter, Cynicism, or the Stratechri Bundle, which includes several other podcasts from me and daily writing from my friend Ben Thompson. I'm an incredibly biased news consumer, so I think both are indispensable resources. But either way, Bill and I are going to be here every week talking all things China, and we would love to have you on board. So check out your Show Notes, subscribe and we will talk to you soon.
Episode: (Preview) K-Shaped Economic Data And Its Implications; Ma Xingrui News; Closing Window for Open Source AI?; The SCS and International Law
Date: July 16, 2026
Hosts: Andrew Sharp (A), Bill Bishop (C, Sinocism)
Main Theme: Understanding the “K-shaped” trajectory of China’s economy—diverging fortunes between high-tech exports/manufacturing and a languishing domestic market—and the implications for both domestic policy and global markets.
This episode centers on China's latest economic data, the growing divide between strong export-led manufacturing and sustained domestic weakness (“K-shaped” economic trends), and the repercussions within China and globally. The hosts also touch on the property sector’s malaise, the role of subsidies and exports in the auto industry, and the geopolitics of trade surges, notably with the EU. The conversation is candid, data-driven, and peppered with sharp commentary about both Chinese policy and the global response.
GDP Growth Slowdown:
Government Response:
Memorable Quote:
Chinese Vehicle Export Surge:
Domestic Market Struggles:
Export Strategy:
Consumer Signals:
China’s Reluctance to Restructure:
Impact on Global Markets and Peers:
Skeptical View of EU Resolve:
Long-Term Shifts in Property Sector:
[03:54] C (on macro policy):
“A lot of this, I think, is within the range of what they can tolerate, especially given the turmoil that's coming from the war in the Middle East.”
[05:49] C (on manufacturing strength):
“So they can point to the parts of the...new quality productive forces parts of the economy that are doing well...it's not all doom and gloom.”
[07:27] A (reading Michael Dunn's tweet):
“Never before in 100 years of the automobile industry has one country's exports exploded like this.”
[10:10] C (on exports as a solution):
“One of the ways to fight involution is to export away from it.”
[11:22] A (on global impact):
“You have this manufacturing powerhouse that is continuing to eat sector after sector after sector and is exporting out unemployment issues to the rest of the world. And all of it is happening in plain sight.”
[12:41] C (on PRC’s lack of restructuring):
“Why would they. It's working, but it's, it's, it's working for them.”
[13:30] C (on EU approach):
“They're in fantasy land.”
This episode is essential listening for anyone tracking China’s economy, its impact on global markets, and the evolving tension between domestic challenges and export-led strategies. The hosts offer pragmatic analysis, skepticism about global responses, and a clear-eyed view of Chinese policymaking priorities.