
Loading summary
Bill Bishop
Foreign.
Andrew Sharp
Welcome to Sharp, China. I'm Andrew Sharp and you are listening to a free preview of today's episode.
Hello and welcome back to another episode of Sharp China. I'm Andrew Sharp and on the other line, Bill Bishop. Bill, how you doing?
Bill Bishop
I'm doing well. And I'm actually listening to the sound of dripping water as, as the Arctic thaw finally ends in D.C. it's sound.
Andrew Sharp
That we have been dreaming about for two weeks here in Washington, D.C. it's warm outside, relatively speaking, I would say. I think we're going to hit like 45 degrees today, which feels like 75 degrees. So hallelujah is where we're beginning the podcast. And the neighborhood is much calmer today after the visits from the monks stopped traffic for about four hours earlier in the week. So I'm enjoying the peace around the neighborhood. Did you see the monks?
Bill Bishop
So they walked right by our house. They were early. I was watching the map and then went to bed the night before and I said, okay, I'll be there like 8:30 or so and noticed all this traffic at about 8. But I was like, that's weird. And then when I checked the map again, they were already gone.
Andrew Sharp
Too bad.
Bill Bishop
But they went right, they walk right by our house.
Andrew Sharp
So you saw the traffic. You saw the traffic. And the monks were in our midst.
Bill Bishop
This says a group, they had lunch. They had a lunch a block from you, I think, right at the church.
Andrew Sharp
They had lunch at the church where my son attends preschool. And so I walked over there and I saw a group of monks. These for anybody who's not aware, these monks were walking from Texas to Washington.
Bill Bishop
D.C. and walk for peace, I think they called it. Right.
Andrew Sharp
A walk for peace. Indeed. And so there was a lot of fanfare around the city over the last couple of days and around our neighborhood. My son was sitting there watching the monks walk in and he 3 years old. I don't think he was that into it, but he was just fidgeting with his shoelaces the entire time. In any event, I enjoyed it. I enjoyed watching the community come together and celebrate peace. We will begin, though, with a follow up on last week as we've gotten more color on the Trump XI call that we discussed on last week's episode. I'll read a headline from the Financial Times. China warns US Arms sales to Taiwan could threaten Trump visit in April. And they write the US Is compiling a large arms sale of Patriot missiles and other weapons for Taiwan that Beijing has privately warned could jeopardize President Donald Trump's state visit to China in April. The Trump administration is developing a package of four systems for Taiwan the to purchase on the heels of the record $11.1 billion arms package it unveiled in December, according to eight people familiar with the situation. China has raised serious concerns about the package ahead of Trump's planned meeting with President Xi in April. Three of the people said China told the US that the arms sales could derail the visit. Xi raised the Taiwan arms sale issue with Trump in a call last Wednesday, according to the Chinese Foreign Ministry. He emphasized that the US Quote, must handle the issue of arms sales to Taiwan with prudence. So, Bill, that dovetails with some of what you were speculating on last week. What do you think is happening here? What have you heard about this arms shipment?
Bill Bishop
So, I mean, good for Dimitri over the Financial Times with another scoop. He got the details as we discussed last week.
Andrew Sharp
Week's.
Bill Bishop
On last week's episode, you know, we talked about, we tried to parse out the readout of the Chinese readout of the C. Trump call. And we talked about that language and the sort of the use of the word prudence. What I had heard then was that a few days before the call, the Chinese ambassador to the US had gone to the White House and basically thrown. Had been quite upset because he'd gotten wind of this massive arms package. Okay.
Andrew Sharp
And you know, historically, flipping tables over.
Bill Bishop
Well, basically, you know, again, there had been this $11 billion package announced in December which, which was a very large. Usually the U.S. you know, they could go out in pieces. You know, a billion here, a billion there, there abouts. I think the 11 billion was, again, it was a number that I kind of shocked the Chinese. Leaving aside whether or not there's actually going to be any money in Taiwan to pay for it because of the way the Taiwan legislature is, you know, the opposition coalition that controls the legislature is blocking the budget money to buy some of the stuff.
Andrew Sharp
Yeah.
Bill Bishop
But the point is the US Is signaling or saying, we'll sell you these weapons. This package, which the Financial Times reported about, which said it was 20 billion. I think that a couple of the questions that I have and have not gotten great answers. I've gotten some hints, but not great answers is given the sensitivities around the Trump administration, at least from the top President Trump, Secretary Bessant, Stephen Miller are very focused on not doing anything that's gonna derail the president's visit, derail the current sort of trade detente or the president's visit in April. Was the president even aware of this package and who was really putting it together. And so it's not really clear that it may actually have been that the president himself was surprised that this was going on. And so whether or not the Chinese threat that the Financial Times reported on that about sort of this may blow up the visit is true. Now, I think the odds are that whatever this package is will not see the light of day until after he interesting visit to China. Yeah. But it's interesting if within the Trump administration, you know, again, there are, you know, what I heard was, well, actually, there are people in the Department of Defense. There are folks who are not happy with sort of the rhetorical, Some of the support from the top around Taiwan and also around Japan. And so this is the lack of support.
Andrew Sharp
The lack of support.
Bill Bishop
The lack of support. And so there's you know, there's just potentially some interesting kind of counter currency in the administration where Fishers.
Andrew Sharp
Sure.
Bill Bishop
Where sort of there's discomfort with the top of the administration. The president seeming to basically want to do anything almost to get his China trip and get the trade deal to keep it intact. That said, now that it's public again, on the one hand, if they delay pushing it through, there'll be accusations of Taco. But the reality is, is this was never formalized. And so I think that ultimately it will probably just fade away until sometime after that visit, and then we'll see. From the Chinese perspective, I mean, the weapon systems mentioned in that package are also, I think, some things the Chinese don't want Taiwan to have. And, you know, this is the first of the red lines, the one that you can't cross from the, as the Chinese describe Taiwan. And so I think that, you know, the Chinese side has, on the one hand, right. We all talk about how President Trump seems like he's gone in some ways, gone a bit soft on China. On the other hand, you know, the $11 billion arms package was a big deal.
Andrew Sharp
Yeah.
Bill Bishop
And from the Chinese perspective, I don't think they, I don't think they'll believe that this was sort of like kind of a rogue group. I'm not saying it was a rogue group, but this wasn't some sort of a. More of a coordinated policy to continue to push on Taiwan from, you know, push on China's red lines. And so I do think the administration will not move forward until after the visit because it does really seem like lots of other things have been slowed or put on hold, lots of other actions against China to make sure that the visit can happen.
Andrew Sharp
Well, and ultimately we're talking about two months until the visit. So it's not like waiting until.
Bill Bishop
Not even. Yeah, like seven, like seven weeks or so. Yeah. And the thing is, it's like other things where pushing hard on Taiwan. I mean, I think, you know, there was in that Financial Times article, there was. They quoted some unnamed official, I think, where they, you know, talking about the Chinese threat that they might, this might cause them to cancel the visit, and quoted some one or two officials saying they think the Chinese are bluffing. I actually would be, I would not be surprised if the Chinese are not bluffing, that if this additional package goes through, then at some point it's like, okay, 11 billion was a big deal and that pissed us off, and now you're doubling down with an almost double the size just a couple months later, you know, right. Enough.
Andrew Sharp
$20 billion in arm sales is a big deal. There's no question about it. And in retrospect, I mean, we talked about it last week as well, but the rival readouts from the call were.
Bill Bishop
Honestly pretty hilarious because President Trump just said Taiwan.
Andrew Sharp
Right. Well, and he mentioned, like, soybeans, Ukraine trade, aircraft, and Taiwan was mentioned. And then the Chinese side, Taiwan, Taiwan, Taiwan, Taiwan. So it reflects the focus on the PRC side. No question about it. And it is. I mean, I guess we'll have to continue to peel the onion in terms of what is driving the Trump administration's policy here. Because on one hand, you could say this goes in the category of watch what the Trump administration is doing, not what Trump himself is saying. Like, back in January, there were folks who were disappointed that the US Wasn't vocally speaking out about the end of year PLA exercises the way some other countries were. But among the countries who spoke out, none of them were selling transformative arms packages to Taiwan. $20 billion in arms to Taiwan. And then, you know, it's an open question as to whether this is a faction of the Trump administration that is pushing this and not the Trump inner circle. I don't know if I buy the idea that Trump and his inner circle, on one hand is just pausing all competitive actions on China, but then on the other, they just accidentally greenlit a $10 billion arms sale to Taiwan. But who knows? It's certainly possible.
Bill Bishop
And I mean, I think, I think once it was greenlit, announced, that that had to have, you know, that again, maybe the President wasn't fully on board on that. But I think at that point, you know, it's going to be the Secretary of Defense or war or whatever calls himself These days. And then it'll be the Secretary of State. You see this as well, right? I mean, we have the, you know, not that we want to go rehash the H200 saga, but at this point, they still haven't licenses from the U.S. i don't think have, still have not been issued because the hold up at the Department of State. Yeah, right. And.
Andrew Sharp
And because of competing agendas and different policy ideas.
Bill Bishop
And, and along with the sort of the, the H200 and advanced AI chips today you've got a story from Semaphore that the, the person nominated to be the head of the National Security Agency, Lieutenant General Joshua Reid. In response, he's going through his. Getting ready for his confirmation hearing in response to questions from Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, said that China is aggressively looking to acquire advanced AI chips in order to accelerate its development of AI enhanced weapons. Which sort of flies in what people like David Sachs have been saying and Jensen Huang have been saying about China. They're not going to trust our Nvidia chips for weapons.
Andrew Sharp
Yeah, well, definitely not on message with certain elements of the Trump administration. So, yeah, I guess more will be revealed. But who, who. Xi Jin, former global Times editor, said if the Financial Times report is true and the US sells $20 billion worth of weapons to Taiwan, it will certainly trigger a very serious crisis. At that time, it's hard to believe that mainland China will simply conduct another island encircling military exercise. I am more inclined to believe that mainland China will take some real actions. I don't know what to make of those.
Bill Bishop
I mean, he also, I mean, you know, my nickname for him is chicken hawk. Who, you know, I think that ultimately, you know, when Nancy Pelosi went. What was that? 20, 23, 24. God, the time flies in my.
Andrew Sharp
22, maybe.
Bill Bishop
Yeah, 22 it is. I think it was 23 because right before, you know, he was talking about how they might shoot down our plane. Okay, 2022. Sorry. Yeah. That is crazy. Wow, that's almost four years ago.
Andrew Sharp
Time flies when you're just immersed in chaos here.
Bill Bishop
Yeah, I mean, all that's good politics, all joking aside. I mean, I hope, I hope this is more of the sort of his chicken. Chicken hawk approach to Twitter, but I.
Andrew Sharp
Think the sentiment does show how serious and sensitive it is.
Bill Bishop
Serious. It is serious, but it's also serious that you, I mean, again, the balance has shifted. The US policy, at least from the US legal perspective. And that like the, you know, the, the US is for a long time has said they'll continue to sell weapons to China, to Taiwan. Sorry. You know, to help sort of maintain a balance. And, you know, they're way out of balance now. And so I think there's certainly reasons why on the US Side and people who support Taiwan, you know, think we've been doing this for a long time. And so, you know, we're not going to stop. That said, from the Chinese perspective, it is, it is crossing the red line. And so the question then becomes, at what point do they actually do something about that crossing the red line? It may be that they cancel a visit. It may be something much more, you know, basically some sort of act of aggression that leads to conflict, which is what Hu Xijin is threatening.
Andrew Sharp
Yeah, well. And how invested is Donald Trump in making this visit to Beijing in April?
Bill Bishop
And I personally, I mean, I think he's much more, he doesn't again, I think it's much more about making sure that he can get this visit, the trade deal holds and he can make his visit. So that's why I think that this latest mooted package will not see the light of day anytime soon. It's interesting, right? I mean, it was in the ft, but clearly the Chinese had already heard about it because she Fung had gone to the administration and and you know, had a fit about this and made all sorts of, you know, made done the spiel about why it's, you know, crossing a red line. And apparently, you know, last night there was an embassy party, PRC embassy event for, for Lunar New Year. And as expected, in his speech he also talked about Taiwan and red lines. And you know, it's just the normal, so there's the normal sort of talking points. But I think the Chinese perspective is you're just not listening. So we have to talk not only louder but make more threats and then maybe you'll start paying attention. And then the question is again, well.
Andrew Sharp
And then on the American side, there's a long standing tradition of pausing competitive actions until you engage and go to Beijing, for instance, and then restarting competitive action. So if that's the way this plays out, it would be in keeping with a lot of history of US China back and forth.
Bill Bishop
Right. And certainly, I mean, and certainly, certainly from the, you know, if you go back to the Biden administration, it was almost sort of a running joke that any time there was going to be a leader to leader engagement either right before, right after the US would slap some sort of new round of sanctions on China.
Andrew Sharp
All right. And that is the end of the free preview. If you'd like to hear the rest of today's conversation and get access to full episodes of Sharp China each week. You can go to your Show Notes and subscribe to either Bill's newsletter, Cynicism, or the Stratechri Bundle, which includes several other podcasts from me and daily writing from my friend Ben Thompson. I'm an incredibly biased news consumer, so I think both are indispensable resources, but either way, Bill and I are going to be here every week talking all things China, and we would love to have you on board. So check out your Show Notes, subscribe and we will talk to you soon.
Date: February 12, 2026
Hosts: Andrew Sharp & Bill Bishop
Summary of the Free Preview
This episode focuses on breaking developments in US-China relations, with a particular spotlight on the political drama surrounding a potential new US arms sale to Taiwan. The hosts analyze Beijing's reaction to the sales, the Trump administration’s internal maneuvering, and the broader implications for upcoming diplomatic engagements. The preview also touches on the perennial tension in cross-strait relations, factional politics within US policy circles, and the strategic messaging from both sides.
Starts: 00:11
Starts: 01:46
Starts: 03:38
Bill Bishop elaborates:
Speculation:
Projection:
Starts: 07:37
Starts: 09:05
Starts: 10:32
Starts: 11:47
Starts: 14:01
Trump appears highly invested in making his China visit and securing a trade deal—he may sacrifice the arms sale for optics and diplomatic stability.
China’s messaging is clear: the red line is not just rhetorical.
Both sides resort to the traditional dance of pausing “competitive actions” in the lead-up to summits, only to resume friction afterward.
Bill Bishop: Draws a parallel to the Biden administration, where sanctions would drop immediately before or after leader-to-leader engagements, underscoring the cyclical nature of diplomatic escalation and détente.
Andrew Sharp:
Bill Bishop:
Hu Xijin (quoted by Andrew):
The conversation maintains a blend of wry observation, deep skepticism, insider analysis, and occasional humor. Both hosts mix policy detail with a knowing sense of the cyclical, sometimes theatrical nature of US-China negotiations.
The episode’s central theme is the fraught interplay between American domestic politics, US-Taiwan arms sales, and Chinese diplomatic red lines, all set against the backdrop of an anticipated Trump-Xi presidential summit. The hosts illuminate not just the complexity but the inherent contradictions and performative moves on both sides—a dance as familiar as it is fraught, with much still left to play out after the April summit.