Transcript
Joyce Vance (0:04)
Welcome to this episode of Sisters sidebar with Barb McQuaid and me, Joyce Vance. If you've got a question for us, and we hope you do, please email us@sistersinlawolitikon.com or tag us on social media using Sisters in Law. But don't just type your questions. Your voices are important, and we want to be able to hear them, too. So our overlords, our wonderful producers, have helped us figure out out how to do that. Now you can email us a voice memo using one of your notes apps, and we might get to play it on the show. Let's get started. And speaking of audio questions, Barb, there's an audio question for you from Harry.
Harry (0:47)
Hello, sisters, this is Harry from Richmond, Virginia. In light of the Seashell indictment of Jim Comey, I'm wondering whether the Department of Justice will now be setting up grand juries throughout the country to indict every single person carrying a sign at the no Kings rallies and others saying 86 47. Thanks for educating me and everyone else, and keep up the good work. Thank you.
Barb McQuaid (1:17)
Well, thanks for that question, Harry. It's one that's certainly been on our minds. I saw an interesting meme this week of Cash Patel in an FBI raid jacket and then a banner that said CSI Seashells Victims Unit. So I think we're all thinking about. About that. But it is a problem, isn't it? As you've said, we see this, you know, 8647 on T shirts. We see it at no Kings rallies. We see it all over Amazon. I actually went on there and did a search. You can find T shirts, caps, bumper stickers that say 86 47. And here's why it matters. It's not simple hypocrisy. It is a matter of what's called selective prosecution, which is a violation of due process. And so I imagine we will see a motion from Jim Comey filing a motion to dismiss this indictment for selective prosecution. This often fails. But the argument here would be that other people similarly situated have. Have not been prosecuted for communicating the exact same message. And I think he's got a very strong case here that this prosecution is arbitrary, not for any lawful, legitimate law enforcement purpose, and that it was. He was selected not because there's a desire to improve public safety, but as demonstrated by the failure to charge all of these other people to single him out to punish him. Joyce, I've got a question for you. Here's your next question. This one comes to us from Kathy in Montgomery County, Maryland. She asks what happens to the congressional representatives serving in a district if it gets divided or a new one is added due to redistricting. Do they move over automatically?
Joyce Vance (3:05)
You know, this is such a great question because there's a lot of redistricting in the air. And the short answer, Kathy, is that they don't move over automatically. Redistricting changes the map, not the person holding the office. So here's how it'll work. Current representatives, they'll keep their seats until the next election. Even if a district is split up or redrawn. The sitting member of the United States House of Representatives, they continue to serve the remainder of their term. And the new district lines will take effect for representation during the next election cycle. An interesting little gloss on this is that these folks don't have to move to run under the Constitution, House members have to live in the same state, but not necessarily the exact district, so they can run in the new district even if they've been sort of, it's called gerrymandered out of it. Politically though, living in the district really matters a lot to voters. So we're all talking about the impacts of gerrymandering and redistricting right now with the current Republican led race to the bottom. The this will have real impact on candidates. And as we discussed in our show last week, candidates don't have an entitlement to these seats in Congress. Right. None of us should feel sorry for them. But to the extent that people have representatives that they've elected that they would like to keep, this really does become a political sort of a musical chairs issue with making sure that people still have a district that they can run in. Well, Barb, here's a question for you from Jenny. She asks if someone has no will or identifiable next of kin, what happens to their stuff and how do the lawyers involved get paid?
