Loading summary
A
Hello and welcome to Sleep Money, your guide to the business and finance news of the week. I'm Felix Salmon of Bloomberg. I'm here with Emily Peck of Axios.
B
Hello. Hello.
A
I'm here with Elizabeth Spires of the New York Times. Hello. And especially wonderfully, I have Craig Trudel beaming in from the Bloomberg offices in in London. Craig, welcome.
C
Hi. Thank you for having me.
A
Craig, introduce yourself. Who are you?
C
I am the global automotive editor for Bloomberg.
A
What that means is that you are covering the big picture in cars. And so that is what I want to talk about this week with you. There was big news from Ford, but it turns out for those of us who notice the rest of the planet, that there's big news from the European Union. There's lots of stuff going on in China. So we are going to talk about what is happening with EVs. What is the big picture? Is this the death knell of the American automotive industry? We are also going to of course, talk about the fact that Trump Media and Technology Group is now a nuclear fusion company for reasons Emily is going to wax lyrical about the wonders of Hallmark Christmas movies. We have a Slate plus segment where we reveal the one gift we wish that someone would give us. It's a happy holiday episode of Slate. Money coming right out.
B
Ford BlueCruise Hands Free highway driving takes the work out of being behind the wheel, allowing you to relax and reconnect while also staying in control. Enjoy the drive in BlueCruise enabled vehicles like the F150 Explorer and Mustang Mach E. Available feature on equipped vehicles. Terms apply. Does not replace safe driving. See Ford.com BlueCruise for more details.
A
This message is a paid partnership with Apple Card. Fun fact, I never leave home without my Apple card. I mean, would you want to miss out on daily cash back on everyday purchases subject to credit approval. Apple card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA Salt Lake City Branch terms and more@applecard.com so obviously, Craig, we're going to start with you because there has been enormous news this week on the EV front, not just in Europe, which seems to have started backpedaling on its desire to make sure everyone only drives EVs, but also in the United States where ford took a $19 billion charge and a bunch of that was real money, like actual cash that they've just sort of gone up in smoke. And correct me if I'm wrong here, but the general message that I got from Ford was we were doing EVs because that's what Joe Biden told us to. And now Donald Trump has told us to not do EVs, so we're not doing EVs. And if only the US government could be consistent, that would be great. But otherwise we're just going to go back and forth according to who's in the White House. This doesn't seem smart.
C
I think that's generally right. I think it's maybe even slightly more complicated than that, right? In that, like, even when Trump was in office, the first time you had Tesla sort of as this rising power within the industry, and everybody in Detroit was freaking out about the Model 3, eventually the Model Y, and all the while, Trump was undermining fuel economy and emission standards. And so they had to kind of navigate that. Then you have Biden come in, he says he wants half of vehicles sold to be EVs or hybrids by the end of the decade. Everybody sort of rushes to meet that vision and also make subsidy grabs and, and DOE loans and so on and so forth. And then, absolutely, the rug gets pulled out from under Ford and the rest of the industry. When Trump comes back and he goes even further, this time, he eliminates penalties for fuel economy standards. Those made a lot of headlines recently, but they don't matter because there's nothing sort of enforcing those new, weaker rules and emissions standards may be going away as well if we have the EPA just decide that, you know what, it's not appropriate for us to be governing tailpipe emissions either.
B
But Jim Farley and his statements. And like, just reading through.
A
Jim Farley is the Ford CEO.
B
The Ford CEO. And just reading through a lot of the commentary, there was a lot of. Yes, but it's not just the fact that the Trump administration pulled away from EVs, it's that customers weren't as into them as everyone had hoped, truly. And that doesn't seem like a fib, right?
C
I think there's absolutely validity to that. I grew up in a sort of, you know, rural area of Michigan, and when I go back home and talk with friends and family members about, you know, hey, would you consider buying a fully electric vehicle? They, you know, either look at me funny or just laugh in my face. And I think a lot of America still, you know, forget about buying electric vehicles. They're still buying really thirsty F Series pickups. Right? Those are still Ford's bread and butter. I think there was, you know, some progress being made in sort of changing that mindset. And I think we have to give Tesla credit in that regard. And yet it's really been a case where Tesla is the only one who's been successful in the US in sort of getting Americans into EVs.
A
A friend of mine has a Ford Lightning pickup truck. This is their electric version of the F150. He has a pool company in North Carolina and he not only loves his truck, but he's like, all of the burly construction guys who come around are obsessed with it and say that they want one and completely love it. And they're like, oh my God, that's so cool. I do think that there is more of a love for EVs or like an excitement about EVs in principle than necessarily has shown up in the market. I think, you know, the people who say that they love it, I think they do love it. They're just not necessarily going out and buying it. But by the same token, you say that the Tesla's the only game in town anymore, which is kind of true when it comes to the pure EVs. But their sales have been slowing for the past two years, partly because, you know, the libs don't want to give money to Elon Musk. And I need to ask you as a Bloomberg reporter, like, how is it possible for a company with not only zero, but negative growth to be worth like over $1 trillion? I don't understand how the stock market hasn't punished Tesla yet for the fact that the only way you can get to that kind of evaluation is by extrapolating massive future growth. And the growth just isn't here.
C
Yeah, the growth has not only dissipated, it has disappeared. You have a situation where I feel like, to borrow a phrase from one of my colleagues, Dana Hull, who covers Tesla for us out of San Francisco, Elon Musk is bored with making cars. And I think part of that boredom is a legitimate sort of issue of kind of been there, done that. I also think it's a sort of acknowledgment of the idea of, you know, what? Actually the car business is really freaking difficult. And if I can sort of, you know, wave these bright shiny objects of humanoid robots and robo taxis that may or may not actually exist sort of over here, I can distract everybody from the fact that my sales are, you know, not only, you know, slowing, they're actually declining. And, you know, I've torched my brain.
D
I have a theory also. You know, I grew up in a rural area where every household has a big ass truck. And do you think that specifically maybe, like people are nervous about trucks as fully ev?
C
Yeah, absolutely. I think in retrospect they were the wrong sort of body style to try to fully electrify right off the bat. It made sense in that on one hand, yes, Americans like to buy big ass trucks. On the other hand they want to be able to tow, they want to be able to haul. And a battery depletes very quickly when you're towing or hauling things. And in order to be able to power a vehicle that's so big and so heavy, you, you need a bigger, heavier battery. And it's just sort of a matter of physics that there was sort of skepticism from the engineers who know better that this was ever going to work out. And I think in retrospect that skepticism was warranted.
A
So Ford's bright idea is, correct me if I'm wrong here, to basically replace the Lightning, which is their electric truck, with what's known as an erev, basically an electric truck that has a little gas tank in it that you can fill up with petrol. And then that doesn't move the wheels, it doesn't actually do any, but it will work as a kind of generator to recharge the battery if you need it to. And so obviously there are going to be tailpipe emissions from that, but it's going to be a much smaller engine than you would find in a normal track. Is this like the future or is this just another dead end?
C
I love this aspect of the story because it's sort of, we have to go back to remember when General Motors went bankrupt and like the one reason that America wanted to save gm or one of the big reasons the Obama administration was like, you know what? This company is worth saving. It was the Chevrolet Volt. Do you remember the plug in hybrid? That was an extended range electric vehicle, an eRev. And so we're basically going to voltify pickups and SUVs. I do think that actually sort of solves this issue of Americans liking bigger vehicles and extending the range of these vehicles by having an onboard gas engine. And you know, in retrospect that was part of what sort of was the Volt's undoing, right, was that it was kind of, you know, as a concept it looked really sexy. And then once it made it into production, it kind of looked like a funky sort of toastery compliance car. And it sold like a funky toastery compliance car.
A
Who doesn't want to drive around in a funky toaster, Craig?
B
So the US seems to be kind of moving backwards on EVs. The EU also seems to be moving backwards. They've punted. They had a goal of 20, 30, I think all electric vehicles. 2035, 2035. They punted on that. But. And then all the pundits are like, but China is moving ahead. China is leading the way. Now, did China just basically win the EV race if there wasn't, haven't they.
A
Been winning it for years?
B
Is it official now? I don't.
A
Is it official now?
C
I think it is both true that China is absolutely lapping the rest of the world with electric vehicles. I also think that we may be getting carried away and sort of, you know, saying, woe is European and China is sort of running circles around because if we actually look at what the rules are in China, they have not set a timeline for going fully electric. And their leading manufacturers, BYD being the biggest and baddest of them, they make a plug in hybrid for every battery electric vehicle that they make. So I think there's a little bit of a tendency to sort of lean into this notion that China is just so world beating because the volumes are so large and yet Europe has made much more progress than the US has. And I do think that even with these rules softening a bit, we're going from wanting 100% emissions reduction by 2035 to 90%. And yes, there's some fudging of that 90% number where they're going to give credit to locally made vehicles. So there will be some sort of compliance credits that make that 90% number kind of fudged. But the direction of travel is going to remain that manufacturers here in Europe really have to go electric quickly. And that's why you're seeing some whinging on the part of the Germans after this announcement.
A
So I guess the first question is, yeah, it's true that in China there is a broad mix of drivetrains, but in Europe, if we Fast forward to 2035 where there's a 90% reduction in emissions, that means, to use a technical term, a fuckton of the cars being sold are going to be electric, are going to be pure electric. And just looking at where we are today and who the big EV manufacturers are and who is selling the EVs and who is not selling the EVs, is it reasonable to assume that most of those EVs being sold in Europe are actually going to wind up being Chinese?
C
I think they have had no trouble continuing to grow at this really incredible rate, even in spite of tariffs being put in place just last year? I do think that there is what one of the stories that I'm going to be watching in 2026 is like which manufacturers start to hit a ceil on their volumes for Europe in the sense that I do think that while byd, for example, has made much more of a name for themselves as a manufacturer, they do not have a Corolla or just a sort of. They don't have the brand cachet or the recognition. If you ask the average German or French person on the street to name a single BYD car, I think 99 out of 100 would say, yeah, sorry, I can't do it. And it's really, you know, going to take them some time to do some brand building, get more established and go beyond just fleet cars.
A
Don't people just go out and buy a BYD car? Does it matter whether they know what the name of the model is?
C
It's honestly a good question because I think the price is so good and so substantially, you know, competitive, and you get sort of more for that money as well. And, you know, I think the Chinese companies also have been reluctant to be too aggressive on price because of concerns about what Brussels will do if and when they do get out over their skis in that regard. So that will be the sort of counter to my point of, you know what, maybe there's only so much growing they can do.
A
And Ford weirdly announced an EV in Europe as a joint venture. Was it Renault?
C
Renault, yes. That's a really interesting one because we've been watching the way things have been trending with Ford, particularly on the passenger vehicle front. The amount of market share loss there has been so substantial that we've started to wonder, you know, is Ford Europe long for this world? I do think they make a lot of commercial vehicles and vans, that that business is still strong for them and is, you know, more profitable anyway. But it was absolutely fascinating because they already have a partnership with Volkswagen, where you basically have Ford badged Volkswagen electric vehicles made in Germany. And so we're going to see more of that just with the French now.
A
So the big question, I think, from an American perspective is this one, which is the Europeans are still going to be forcing their manufacturers to really move to EVs. The Chinese, as we know, are going to be a major force in EVs come what may. So we're going to have two major markets and manufacturing powerhouses building a huge number of EVs in a world which I think everyone agrees eventually it's going to become electric. It just makes all the sense in the world. So given that the US manufacturers are just basically not in the game anymore, Tesla notwithstanding, is this the End of American car companies as a global force. Like they're just going to be sitting here in their domestic market insulated from Chinese competition because the Chinese don't import into the United States and they sell their, you know, ICE cars in the US until they don't. And then eventually everyone just buys electric cars from somewhere else. And the long term future of the US auto industry just seems to be zero.
C
I think there's a real concern, especially just from the perspective of what the industry needs in order to make electric vehicles work is scale. And they have really struggled with reaching the sorts of volumes where you do get to a point where your batteries can be cheaper and you can bring price down and offer consumers, consumers actually affordable electric vehicles.
A
And that scale needs to be global. Right. Like just even the United States isn't big enough.
C
Yeah, I think, you know, the way in which China is absolutely dominating here is the fact that you have companies like Catl just making so many more batteries than there is demand for, that the price is just, you know, so much lower than the rest of the world. And so you are going to see a ton of electric vehicles, particularly here in Europe, that are, you know, built with Chinese made battery cells. And that's the sort of only path to affordability for the moment. And if the U.S. you know, continues down this road of, you know, every four years zigging and zagging in this drastic way, you're going to eventually, you know, reach a point where, you know what, we're just too far behind and EVs are just not going to work here the way they work in the rest of the world.
A
This message is a paid partnership with Apple Card, my favorite travel hack. Easy. It's using Apple Card. It's great knowing that every time I dine out, buy souvenirs or pay my hotel bill using my Apple Card, I'm actually earning up to to 3% daily cash back. So if you're like me and love to travel, then apply for Apple Card in the Wallet app today. Subject to credit approval. Apple Card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA Salt Lake City Branch terms and.
B
More@Applecard.Com this podcast is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever think about switching insurance companies to see if you could save some cash? Progressive makes it easy. Just drop in some details about yourself and see if you're eligible to to save money when you bundle your home and auto policies. The process only takes minutes and it can mean hundreds more in your pocket. Visit progressive.com after this episode to see if you could Save Progressive Casualty Insurance company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states.
A
Let's talk about how the Trumps are. What's the word? There are a couple of, like, woke things in the energy industry. One of them is is EVs and Trump is anti EVs because it's woke. Another one of them is nuclear power, and especially clean nuclear power, because environmentalists love that shit. And somehow for all of, for all the clean nuclear power is woke coded. It is now also Trump coded because the Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social, announced this week that it was going to merge with a nuclear fusion company. And now it is a nuclear fusion company, which makes all the sense in the world, right, Emily?
B
It actually does make sense. So at first it doesn't make sense. You're like Truth Social, that company makes $4 million a year, maybe, and has $400 million a year in losses and.
D
Pays its chief executive $47 million a year.
B
Devin Nunez, of course. And you're like, what? It doesn't make any sense that it's doing anything. Then you read about the nuclear fusion company Tae. This company is legit. It's been around since it's funded by like a who's who of corporate America. Plus Charles Schwab. We know him from our ads. He was an original investor.
A
Isn't his son, like, in charge of it Great?
B
No. I don't know. Also, they have on their board the former energy secretary under Obama who's like a nuclear physicist. This is a legitimate company betting on nuclear fusion, which, to be clear, has not been commercialized and is like, still quite nascent and doesn't really produce anything. What they need is money. And what a company with Trump's name on it now because he is the president. What they are able to do, not build a social media empire, but they are able to amass money, cash, monies. People want to give the company money for reasons they can take all of.
A
The bitcoin that they've been buying and convert it into a fusion reactor they.
B
Can fuse and make make energy of. Anyway, there's some joke.
A
They pay the fusion researchers in bitcoin. This all makes perfect sense.
B
It does make sense, though. It does make sense because I think the journal story had a quote that was just like, you know, this is a company in search of a business. Basically, they have money. People want Trump's branding because he is the president and he has a lot of power and he's not afraid to use it. And so why not give it to this company that is building a TEC technology that doesn't make any money, that just needs lots of money. So it kind of makes sense.
A
I kind of like it because it's a little bit AI coded in that the reason everyone wants power is because AI, but really it's just, you know, people have been dreaming about nuclear fusion for decades. And by the way, in terms of EVs, like the carbon emissions from EVs, if you sort of trace them back to where the electricity comes from are non negligible right now. If that electricity comes from nuclear fusion, then brilliant. It's basically free energy for all. It's awesome. We love it. It's great. Total utopia. Also physically impossible as far as we can make out. But this company, as you say, is convinced that it has some technology that will work and they'll be able to build a utility scale power plant by 2031 or something. Count me skeptical. But if they can get a few extra billion dollars from Trumpy types to try and make that happen, okay, great.
D
Yeah, I love the fact that, you know, the rationale for doing this is fairly straightforward. You know, it's just access to money. But Matt Levine had a great column about this that included a slide from the deck that they presented where they have to come up with the kind of rationalization for doing it that is not as obvious as the one we're talking about. And so the slide just looks completely unhinged. It's. They're talking about how to sort of merge the social media capabilities with the fusion company and they're just throwing out like it looks like a really bad brainstorming session with, you know, red yarn connecting all these disparate things. It's worth reading Matt's column just to see that slide.
B
He also says that the Trump media's revenue is about as much as a top substack newsletter.
A
So. Yeah. So, Craig, we now seem for better or for worse to have reached the point, and this honestly took longer than I thought it would given the whole SPAC boom of 2021, where you've reached the point at which there is now a publicly traded nuclear fusion company with a multibillion dollar market cap. This seems like a milestone. Yeah.
C
I think my great irony is someone who spends way too much time following every musing of Elon Musk online. I'm getting a huge kick out of the fact that he's shitting all over nuclear fusion. And even as he's sort of made this grand makeup with Trump, you have the Trump world Sort of truth social combining with the nuclear fusion company. So he now both x going after a Trump tied company and he's also got all of his solar things that he is going off on. And so, yeah, I guess, in short, I would say this makes about as much sense to me as the AI data centers in space idea that Musk and his ilk are pushing of late.
A
Musk's point. And Musk very rarely makes much sense, but he does. He does. I'm going to give him a little bit of credit for this one. He's like, guys, guys, we have the biggest fucking nuclear fusion reactor. It has been going for billions of years. It's called the sun. It produces infinite amounts of money. Basically all we need to do is put some solar panels out there and capture that energy and that is fusion and it's clean.
B
That makes sense.
A
And like, why would we want to recreate a sun on planet Earth when we actually have one right here that we can capture the energy from? He's not wrong.
C
Got a point.
B
That definitely makes sense.
D
He's also the guy that says we should all go live on Mars even though we have a planet right here that's perfectly serviceable.
A
Yeah, I mean, internally consistent is not something that anyone's ever accused Musk of being. But I, I really do go back and forth on this one. On the one hand, I don't see solar really meeting all of our energy needs. We're going to need a lot more than that. And if fusion works, it's almost like magic. It is, in Arthur C. Clarke's words, you know, indistinguishable from magic. No one's been able to make it work. The technology to make it work does not exist. I think that even Trump's money raising abilities are not going to be enough to A, raise enough money to make it work, or B, even I don't think money alone can do this. But I'm happy there are humans out there trying to make it work, because even if there's a small probability. That sounds great to me before we.
B
Go down the road of speculating about nuclear fusion, which Craig probably knows a lot about it, but I don't think we know that much about it. Can we also raise this question, which I've been thinking about this morning, which is like, theoretically, Trump is going to be president only for another three years. What happens to all this money and like, all this juice that his name has once he leaves office? What happens to nuclear fusion's prospects now that it's tied it? They've tied themselves to this guy.
A
Well, obviously they just need to raise all of the money between now and the end of his presidency. Right. And then at that point they've reached takeoff velocity or they haven't. I think that's the bet.
B
Okay, so it's just like get us the cash now while the Trump is hot and then once it's not, doesn't matter.
A
Yeah. The classic thing about raising money in the stock market is you do it when you can and when you can raise lots of money and you don't do it when you can't.
B
Okay. And like, presumably the executives and brilliant minds behind Trump media, there's no synergies where they're like gonna integrate themselves with the nuclear physicist on the board who used to work in the Obama administration. I think the nuclear physicists out or something on the board.
A
There's this hilarious like co CEO situation where basically the nuclear physicists are going to keep on running the nuclear physics and Devin Nunez is gonna keep on running Truth Social and they're just going to have this kind of maybe like once a year they can meet for coffee or something and shake each other's hands and then go back to what they were doing before.
D
Isn't there something just a little disconcerting though about a nuclear company tied to what's basically a meme stock?
B
Yes.
A
Well, I mean, remember it's fusion, right? It's not, it's not like radioactive nuclear, although just fusion.
B
Just the power of the sun and trying to harness it, whatever.
A
Although apparently there are like interesting like radioactive of things that are byproducts that you I. But yeah, I, I we're all so far away from that at the moment that I think, I think we can. That that's the least of our worries.
D
I'm glad Devin Nunez is anywhere near that sort of thing.
B
That's all I remember about him is something to do with a cow.
D
He got very angry that there was a guy parodying him on Twitter. I think the account was called Devin Nunez, California.
B
Okay.
D
Something like that.
B
I see he sued that guy. The cow is not involved with nuclear fusion.
A
What? Who knows? As far as we know, this is 2026. Anything is possible. Slate money is sponsored this week by Lisa. That's a mattress company. People sleep is just as important as how long you sleep. And Leesa really delivers on the how. Leesa mattresses are designed to adjust to your body and sleep position in a way that feels intentional and balanced. It's the kind of support that will help you fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer. I just got a new Leesa mattress and I can attest to this. It supports me. It feels comfortable. You don't get like hot spots where one bit of your body is supported and the other bit isn't. So what that means is you toss and turn less. And what that means is you sleep better. You'll feel the difference from night one. Plus Lisa backs it up with free shipping, easy returns and a 100 night sleep trial. Lisa isn't just about sleep, it's also about impact. They donate thousands of mattresses each year to those in need and they partner with organizations like like Clean Hub to help remove harmful plastic waste from oceans. Go to leesa.com for 20% off mattresses plus get an extra $50 off with promo code Money exclusive for sleep money listeners. That's L E-S-A.com promo code MONEY for 20% off mattresses plus an extra $50 off. Be sure to enter our show name after checkout so they know we sent you Lisa.com promo code money. Slate MONEY is sponsored this week by Vanguard. If you're a financial advisor, let me talk bonds with you. You and me, we understand bonds. Stocks get all oppressed, but bonds are really important. They're at the heart of any sensible financial advisor's strategy. But capturing value in fixed income is not always easy. Bond markets are massive. They can be murky and some firms can throw a couple of flashy funds your way and call it a day. That's not what Vanguard does. Vanguard bonds are institutional quality, which means top grade products across the board. Their philosophy is that the best active strategies should be shared across the team so every client benefits from the collective brain power. The bond market is complex and Vanguard takes a steady approach and focuses on reliability and consistency versus going all in on risky bets. They do have a lineup of over 80 bond funds that are actively managed by a 200 person global team of sector specialists, analysts and traders. Vanguard sets the standard for what dependable investing should look like. So if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, go see the record for yourself@vanguard.com audio that's vanguard.com audio all investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributed Talking about the end of the year, the holiday season. Emily. Yes, Tell us what is going on in Connecticut. Emily is so happy. I like this is the happiest I've ever seen her.
D
She looks very blissed out right now. This is her favorite.
A
Okay.
B
Connecticut, which is a state, is apparently the location for at least 22 holiday films made by Hallmark, which is the leader in the holiday original holiday movie space, which everyone at this point should know. And now Connecticut is promoting tours of the locations behind these 22 films that were filmed in Connecticut. So you can go and you can be super cozy. You can get like a hot cocoa and you can wear gloves and your hat and your scarf, but not around your neck. A scarf in a Hallmark movie is worn on the coat. It has no purpose other than decoration because it's warm when they film those things anyways. But you can go and you can wrap the scarf however you want, drink your cocoa and walk to these different locations. And this is just the latest news in this booming industry, which is original holiday films, which now happen every year. And I think more and more people are saying they watch them, including me, Emily Peck. I'm converted. It started with Hot Frosty, which we discussed previously on the show from Netflix, which is more now that I'm in the Hallmark space, Hot Frosty is like very much more like risque, kind of like edgy holiday original film because of the showing of the naked man, the chest and the six pack, which typically not shown in the Hallmark holiday movies, which are all rated G, usually only have one to two kisses and that's it. And usually one of the two kisses is an almost kiss because there's like, you know, you wait till the end for the full kiss. So there's a whole economy behind Hallmark movies. A lot of it is happening in Connecticut.
A
I love this almost as much as Emily does.
B
I love it unironically. Don't be ironic.
A
Yeah, no, no, I'm not being ironic. I have to admit I have never seen a Hallmark Christmas movie, but I love the idea of Hallmark Christmas movies. And I especially love the idea that there's all of these like mom and pop tour operators with tour coaches driving around small Connecticut towns. I will also say that over the past couple of years of using ChatGPT, I have never received a better answer from ChatGPT as the answer I received when I typed in what are the essential formulaic elements of a Hallmark Christmas movie. And I mean, totally nailed it as someone who's never seen one. But Emily, you can confirm. Okay, there are 10. Okay, so I'll run down the list very quickly. One, a familiar non threatening protagonist who is a successful but emotionally incomplete woman, often big city, career focused, who is temporarily displaced into a small town in Connecticut for Christmas reasons. The character flaw is not moral failure, but misalignment. Yes, she has chosen ambition over what really matters. Number two, A picturesque small town as moral geography. The town functions as a values incubator and is a contrast to the alienation of the city. 3. A love interest who embodies local virtue. Typically male hands on profession like carpenter or tree fireman, owner fireman. Emotionally available but modestly guarded. He is already complete. He does not have his own like thing to overcome for a Christmas adjacent inciting incident. Yes, like being stranded due to weather or inheriting an inn or something like that.
B
Or like the Gingerbread Bake off. And like you have to get it organized.
A
Gingerbread Bake off, which gives a reason for proximity without overt desire and cooperation.
B
The couple has to cooperate and do a task together.
A
Right? 5. A threat to tradition that is never real. So there's some kind of corporate development or sale of a beloved local business, but the threat is entirely reversible. No one loses their livelihood.
B
Yes, they almost closed down the Catnip Cafe. For example, in one of my favorites of this year, the cat cafe was in danger of being closed down by a Scrooge like evil character who turns out to be basically fine and nice in the end. Nothing bad happens. Spoiler alert.
C
The stakes.
A
The stakes. The stakes are so low. The stakes are so low.
B
It's wonderful.
A
This is my favorite one. Number six montage based intimacy which always includes and they've got four bullet points here. Tree decorating, baking cookies, ice skating or charity planning.
B
There's also walking around with hot cocoa and looking at the sights.
A
So that's the important montage.
B
I guess my quibbles would be. I know the trope is big city girl winds up in hometown for some kind of something has happened and they have to be there. And then they learn the lesson of the hometown is amazing or whatever, but sometimes it's a man. Like I watched one, at least one this year where it's a guy who's back in his hometown. Yeah, it's more diverse.
D
All of this is a conservative wish casting. And this is why white evangelicals love Hallmark movies. My mom is like a connoisseur, but you know, the storylines are all about explaining to the big city career woman how wrong she was and she discovers that her hometown was great all along. And this is a fantasy that every conservative parent I know has about their adult children who move to big cities. But I also find it funny that these things are always filmed in Connecticut. Because if the trope is that the jaded city person goes back to rural hometown or whatever, jaded city people Move to Connecticut all the time and they just could commute back in.
B
So they're often in upstate New York. However, I watched at least two to three, including one about the Buffalo Bills shoot. What was it called? The Buffalo Bills Christmas Story. It was a sequel to last year's Chiefs Christmas Story. It's like a football themed one where the two families bond over their love of the Buffalo Bills. And the main love interest, his job is not veterinarian or pediatrician. No, he manages the new construction of the Bills stadium. So very relatable.
C
Are there any folding tables harmed in the filming of that Buffalo Bills?
B
I don't think so. That's a good question.
A
I feel like folding tables appear in this is common trope. But like just to fast forward to the end here. 10. Closure without consequences. By the end, romance is secured, community is preserved, and future ambiguity is gently erased.
B
Yeah, I think that's right. It's never like we're getting married. It's just like we have kissed and we have plans for next week. I think it's more progressive than Elizabeth might be saying, which I understand that it's a fantasy sometimes to move to the hometown, but we did see in Covid, many people did move to their hometowns or out of the big cities in pursuit of this very dream that we see in the Hallmark films.
A
A lot of New Yorkers, they moved up to Putnam county or Kingston, falling.
D
In love with the high school guy.
B
Yeah, they fall in love with their best friend from high school who is extremely good looking. And they, they haven't noticed until they were 32 years old, came back to their hometown and coincidentally, he's still single but totally emotionally mature. Just like Felix said from his ChatGPT list. Yeah.
D
Yes.
B
It's amazing. And people say that Hollywood is dead and movies are over, but there is this booming market in Hallmark films that I feel like we must note Right. In these dark times.
A
In these dark times, we can come together around virtual or even real Coco. And we can also.
B
I will say that the films are short. They are usually two hours or less. And I think Hollywood could take a lesson. You know, Chris Nolan needs to sit down and watch a few of these things and take some pointers away.
A
I really, you know, you know what short movie I just watched and absolutely loved. And since we're on movies right now, I'm just gonna break the rules of Slate money with that. These things have to be vaguely money related. No, they do.
B
Not everyone has money in the Hallmark movies.
A
Yeah. If you want a great family film to watch this Christmas. If you are the last person in the world who has not seen this movie yet, go see or sit down and watch K Pop Demon Hunters. Love that movie.
B
You watched it?
C
It?
A
I watched it.
B
Say more. What is it about?
D
It's right there in the title. Emily.
A
A couple of people I really trust recommended it to me and I watched it. And I hate to say it, But Elizabeth is 100% correct. It does exactly what it says on the tin. It's about a K pop girl band who fight demons. But the twist is because it's not just that. The twist is that the demons they're fighting are a K pop boy band.
C
Oh.
A
Oh, yeah.
B
And the music's good? You like?
A
The music is good. And it's again, it's 95 minutes long. It's perfect length and it's fun and it's touching and it's great.
B
That's amazing. I think the careers of the people in the Hallmark movies are wonderful too because in life I feel like we're always talking to and meeting people with the weirdest job titles and you don't understand what they are. Like marketing consultant, TikTok guru, AI, HR, MC, CP. Like, if you're ever on LinkedIn, the titles make no sense. But in the Hallmark movies, everyone has clear jobs. It's like very much like busy town or whatever. Everyone has like a job you fully can comprehend and is like, good.
A
You know what you never find in a Hallmark movie? Someone falling in love with a blogger.
B
No. But I did watch one that was about a big city newspaper columnist who gets run out of town but is so beloved that her fan base writes to the newspaper. Then they're so angry that they have to hire her back. Newspaper columnist.
D
That definitely happens.
A
What?
B
Another time it was very realistic. I was like, did the algorithm, did it just find me? Like, did it know that this is exactly what I want to, you know, watch a movie about?
A
I will personally do the letter writing campaign to make sure that the newspaper hurting back. Slate money is sponsored this week by Upwork. If your to do list is longer than your work day, then you've officially hit the point where I've got this. This turns into I need help first. Smart business leaders know when it's time to bring in reinforcements before their team burns out. If you are overextended and understaffed, Upwork Business plus helps you bring in top quality freelancers fast. Get instant access to the top 1% of talent on Upwork in marketing, design, AI and more. Ready to jump in and and take work off your plate. When finding talent you can trust feels impossible, it's easy to default to doing everything yourself. Luckily. Upwork Business plus sources, vets and shortlists proven experts so you can stop doing it all and delegate with confidence. Right now, when you spend $1,000 on Upwork Business plus, you'll get $500 in credit. Go to Upwork.comsave now and claim the offer before December 31st. Again, that's Upwork.comsave scale smarter with top talent and $500 in credit, terms and conditions apply. Slate Money is brought to you by Intuit QuickBooks. Managing cash flow can be one of the hardest parts of running a business. But it doesn't have to be. With Intuit QuickBooks you can transform your cash flow and your business. QuickBooks money tools bring your money and your books together in one place, offering real time insights into your cash flow so you can get paid faster, pay bills smarter, and even apply for funding, all without switching platforms. And with QuickBooks money management tools, your books update automatically with every payment and bill, so you spend less time doing chasing invoices and more time making smart decisions. QuickBooks can help you gain real time insights and reveal critical cash flow trends so you'll be more empowered to make the right decisions to sustain growth. QuickBooks isn't just accounting software, it's financial confidence. Try it today. Learn more@quickbooks.com money Again, that's quickbooks.com money Terms apply. Money movement services are provided by Intuitive Hewitt Payments, Inc. Licensed as a money transmitter by the New York State Department of Financial Services. Guys, we should have a numbers round. Elizabeth, you have a number?
D
I do. It's 435 and that's dollars. And that's how much a tomahawk steak cost at Lechen in the West Village.
A
Wait, how many dollars?
D
435.
B
Oh my God.
A
That's an expensive steak.
B
Holy cow.
D
Yes, and we've already talked about beef prices going up, but this has nothing to do with it. This is from a Times piece about restaurants in Manhattan specifically coming up with these insanely expensive dishes that they sort of gratuitously, you know, put caviar on.
A
Them and whatever so you can get a much cheaper steak there. If you don't want to spend $400.
D
I don't know if you can there. They also have a $260 turbo filet.
B
What's the $400 steak like? Does it have like a pile of caviar on it or something? It would Wagyu probably Tell us more about it.
D
But the point of this is in a Times piece about these incredibly expensive dishes at Manhattan restaurants being more and more over the top because the people who are willing to pay for the $435 steak, part of the fun for them is that they're paying $435 for a steak. And so one of the chefs at one of these restaurants with exorbitantly priced food said, you know, anytime we put something on the menu that is insanely expensive, it immediately sells out. Doesn't matter what it is.
B
What?
A
I love it. These people deserve to be separated from their money.
B
But it's just a steak. Why do the how. Why is it so expensive?
A
Because you. Because it has a big price tag on it, Emily. It's the same reason why people spend $5,000 on a bottle of vodka at a nightclub. It's just, you know, the flex and there's nothing.
B
It's not like it has a bunch of stuff on it or it's like, really?
A
I'm sure it has a bunch of stuff on it, but I'm sure that stuff is like 1% of the price.
B
Holy cow.
A
But I also have a Manhattan number, so I feel like this is a good segue. My Manhattan number is 159, which is the number of Starbucks in Manhattan, which is down from 192 last year. It is shrunk by 33. Starbucks. And for the first time in living memory, what this means is that Starbucks is not the biggest chain in Manhattan. Dunkin Donuts has 169 outlets in Manhattan. So Dunkin Donuts is now not only the top chain in Brooklyn, Bronx and Queens, which it always has been, but also in Manhattan. Well done, Dunkin. Also, as we all know, Dunkin Donuts has better coffee than Starbucks. So this is good and true, Emily, believe me. You're a coffee drinker again. Now you should embrace Duncan.
B
I don't drink coffee that much. Sorry.
A
What's your number?
B
My number is 11.2. That's a percent. 11.2% is the share of songs from the 1990s on Q.104.3's 2025 list of the greatest classic rock songs of all time. 1,403 songs.
A
Is that an oxymoron? Is it impossible to be classic rock and also from the 90s?
B
I mean, it's a great question. So in 2005, the share was only 6.3%. So it's almost doubled in the 20 years. And I got this number from Chris Dalariva's. Substack, where he analyzed all 1,043 classic rock songs on Q104.3's list. Cause they do it every year and it was sort of fun to think about. It's basically like time passes and history changes with time and what people consider classic rock evolves. So when I was growing up, there were no songs from the 2000s because of how that was in the future. But now classic rock songs encompass music from the 2000s and from the 1990s. It's a whole new world.
A
But when I was growing up, there were no songs from the 2000s because that was in the future. I feel like that is the greatest thing that anyone has ever seen.
D
That's the best analysis we've had the whole episode.
B
Thank you. When my column goes dark, please write.
A
In Ray, what is your number?
C
You were already all over this during the Cars segment talking about Tesla. My number is 1,629,000,000, and 252,000,000 all round there. That is Tesla's all time high market cap. It is insane to me. That is that.
A
And that's like now that was as.
C
Of Tuesday, so they dropped a bit Wednesday, went back up Thursday.
A
Explain, explain. Like of all the times for Tesla to reach an all time high, like why now?
C
I mean his humanoid robot, the last I saw it in public was handing out out gummies in Times Square. It does nothing of use. I think for the most part the sort of optimism of late has been a combination of omg we're going to pay musk a trillion. Isn't that great? And the second thing is robo taxis and the optimism about this notion that they're going to have fully driverless cars in spite of the fact that Waymo.
A
Is raising cash at a much lower valuation. Right. And it actually has robo tax. Yes.
C
And just this week I think the big catalyst was there was this video on X of a Model Y going around Austin without anyone in it. But we know that he's faked videos like this before and we know that his quote unquote robo taxis in Texas keep crashing despite the fact that they have somebody you know in the car to try and prevent against crashes. So I don't see that scaling substantially in 2026.
A
But we shall see if anyone believes in efficient markets, let them look at this $1.6 trillion valuation for Tesla and explain that one. If you do, if you can send a note in to sleep money slate.com and yeah, thank you for listening. This week. This has been a fun one. Thank you to Jessamyn, Molly and Shayna Roth and Micah Phillips for producing. A special thanks to Craig Friedel for coming in and being with us from London, England. And we will be back next week with more sleep money.
B
With stays under $250 a night. VRBO makes it easy to celebrate sweater weather. Book a cabin with leaf views or a home with a fire pit for nights with friends with stays under $250 a night. Find a home for your exact needs. Book now@verbo.com.
A
Two kinds of phishing out here. One for phish, one for your data. Hackers try to hook you, but Cisco Duo keeps every user and device protected. Cisco Duo phishing season is over. Learn more at duo. Com.
Episode Date: December 20, 2025
Host: Felix Salmon (Bloomberg)
Guests: Emily Peck (Axios), Elizabeth Spiers (New York Times), Craig Trudel (Bloomberg Global Automotive Editor)
This week, Slate Money dives into three core topics shaking up business, finance, and culture:
Expect the trademark Slate Money blend: rigorous yet breezy analysis, biting wit, memorable quotes, and a refreshing holiday spirit.
[02:09–17:28]
“If only the US government could be consistent, that would be great...otherwise we’re just going to go back and forth according to who’s in the White House. This doesn’t seem smart.” — Felix [02:57]
"Customers weren't as into them as everyone had hoped, truly. And that doesn't seem like a fib, right?" [04:36]
“How is it possible for a company with not only zero, but negative growth to be worth like over $1 trillion? I don't understand how the stock market hasn't punished Tesla yet...” [06:05]
"If I can wave these bright shiny objects...I can distract everybody from the fact that my sales are... actually declining." [07:17]
Notable Quotes:
[18:26–27:26]
Felix: “The Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social, announced this week that it was going to merge with a nuclear fusion company. And now it is a nuclear fusion company, which makes all the sense in the world, right, Emily?” [18:44]
Emily: "It actually does make sense." Trump Media has little real revenue, but can raise loads of capital — exactly what a speculative nuclear fusion play needs.
“What they [the fusion company] need is money. And what a company with Trump’s name on it... is able to do — not build a social media empire, but...amass cash. People want to give the company money for reasons." [19:49]
The fusion company (TAE) is credible by startup standards (top investors, big claims about commercializing utility-scale fusion by 2031). Trump branding brings access to capital, no more, no less.
Felix: “It’s a little bit AI coded in that the reason everyone wants power is because AI, but really it’s just, you know, people have been dreaming about nuclear fusion for decades.” [21:11]
Elizabeth: (Citing Matt Levine) The company’s own rationale for merging is “completely unhinged," trying to explain synergies between social media and fusion in a pitch deck that looks "like a bad brainstorming session with...red yarn connecting all these disparate things.” [22:06]
Craig: Musk is trolling the whole fusion space and Trump’s new venture, dubbing solar as the far more rational “fusion reactor.”
“I’m getting a huge kick out of the fact that [Musk is] shitting all over nuclear fusion... even as he’s sort of made this grand makeup with Trump.” [23:10]
Felix: “Musk...He’s like, guys, guys, we have the biggest...nuclear fusion reactor. It’s called the sun. ...Why would we want to recreate a sun on planet Earth when we actually have one right here?" [24:08]
[31:24–41:09]
Felix (astounded by ChatGPT's answer): “What are the essential formulaic elements of a Hallmark Christmas movie?” He reads the top hits, which Emily confirms are accurate.
Classic narrative beats include:
Elizabeth: “All of this is a conservative wish casting. And this is why white evangelicals love Hallmark movies...the storylines are all about explaining to the big city career woman how wrong she was and she discovers that her hometown was great all along.” [36:10]
[44:06–49:32]
Felix Salmon (on EV policy):
"If only the US government could be consistent, that would be great...otherwise we’re just going to go back and forth according to who’s in the White House. This doesn’t seem smart." [02:57]
Craig Trudel (on Tesla and Musk):
"Elon Musk is bored with making cars...If I can sort of, you know, wave these bright shiny objects of humanoid robots and robo taxis...I can distract everybody from the fact that my sales are...actually declining." [07:07]
Emily Peck (on Hallmark movies):
"You can get like a hot cocoa and you can wear gloves and your hat and your scarf, but not around your neck. A scarf in a Hallmark movie is worn on the coat. It has no purpose other than decoration because it’s warm when they film those things." [32:00]
Elizabeth Spiers (on Hallmark as cultural wish-casting):
"This is a fantasy that every conservative parent I know has about their adult children who move to big cities." [36:10]
Felix Salmon (re: time and classic rock):
"But when I was growing up, there were no songs from the 2000s, because that was in the future. I feel like that is the greatest thing that anyone has ever said." [47:44]
Slate Money brings its signature blend of humor, skepticism, and deeply sourced analysis, skewering business fads, policy incoherence, and the reassuring rituals of Christmas cinema. The episode is conversational, slightly irreverent, and rich with fun, quotable exchanges and interdisciplinary insight — a perfect listen for holidays and headlines alike.