Matt Murphy (28:45)
Yeah. So Larry Montgomery, he's a legend. So he starts going to work with Joe. And we worked the case up for almost two years as we're putting them all together. And this, I think, will be interesting to everybody. You know, first thing we did, of course, is we want DNA, right? Like all this technology, all this modern forensics, all that. So we submit the casings for DNA. And the crime lab laughed at me. And I didn't know this. And of course, we all know this. Now, all DNA burns off an expenditure casing because it's just too hot, right? And then it's like, well, maybe fingerprints. And of course, there are no fingerprints on them. So we got nothing there. So I'm hoping, you know, like, drumroll for this brass key that was stuck in the door. But another thing is bronze or brass, it interacts biologically like silver does the same thing. It kills bacteria, it kills biological material. So DNA will not typically remain on certain metals, including the metal that the keys were made out of. So we struck out again. No DNA on the keys, but we resubmitted the casings to the crime lab. Now that 17 guns that it could have been back in 1994 comes back to one gun, and that's a Beretta 92F, which was the exact same gun that Eric Lied about. So now I'm looking at this thinking I'm in the hunt because he's got a gun he lied about. And I've got an expert who will say that model was the gun that was used in the murder. And the only problem is, is that the Beretta 92F is also known as the M9. It was adopted by the US military as the sidearm for their officers for a couple of decades. And that is one of the most widely manufactured guns in the world. So we've got kind of rarish ammo, but I have a gun that is very, very popular. But we learned some more things. We learned that Eric Naposki, two weeks before our murder, got a job at a place called the Thunderbird nightclub on the Newport beach peninsula, which was about 130 yards away from our murder scene on the night of the murder. 130 yards is literally right across the channel right on the peninsula. And he was working that night and he took that job two weeks before the killing. So again, not enough to file maybe right then and there, but the pieces start coming together. And then Larry comes in my office one day and he sits down and he's like, we've got her. Referring to Nanette. We've got her. And there was a report written during the surveillance of Nanette Johnston back in 1994. Okay. And what it was was it was my friend Dave Byington, who wound up being the lead on the Tom and Jackie Hawks murder case, which we've talked about. And he was the cap of the Crimes Against Persons sergeant in Newport. He's just a wonderful detective and a wonderful guy, but he was an undercover narcotics officer. He was Young back in 1994, and he was assigned to watch the beach house with Nanette in it. So there's like a half page report that was in the middle of all these documents that Larry walked into my office with. And I'd read it before, but it just didn't mean anything. And it was basically like it was the night before the funeral. And Nanette had brought her children to Newport the night before the funeral, even though the father of her kids lived nearby in Southern California. She brought the kids and they spent the night in the beach house. And it was Christmas time. And it was, I observed suspect Annette decorating the Christmas tree. And I could see her two children inside. And that was it. It was just basically like a log entry pretty much of the surveillance. And Larry, Larry was a three dimensional thinker. And he goes, let's think about this. She's a horrible person who had ripped off a bunch of ex boyfriends. And like, she was with one guy when he came home from a trip to Vegas. She'd moved out and taken all the furniture and everything of value with her. Like, she had this very pronounced history of really pissing people off. Nanette had plenty of enemies. So if she was innocent, with her background, why would Nanette, as Larry pitched to me, why would she not think the killer might not have been there to get her? And that bill just got in the way. And Larry, being Larry, goes through all of her checks and found that she didn't change the locks on the beach house for 33 more days. And by all accounts, she was a devoted mother. So with a killer on the loose, with a key to one house, there she is. She brought her kids to the last place in all of Orange county where she's going to let those children be. If there's a killer on the loose that might want to kill her, who might just have a key to the beach house, and she didn't even draw the curtains. And then we start thinking, well, neither did Eric, Mr. Security Bouncer Guy. His head wasn't on a swivel either, and he walked into the same beach house. And that's one of those things that when I ultimately argued the case to the jury and you explain that it's not forensic science, it's not DNA statistics, it's not anything like that. It's good old fashioned common sense where a jury's gonna go, yeah, wait a minute. If she was innocent, why is she gonna be at a beach house where the killer might have access? And why would she be exposing her kids to that? And as I'm explaining that to the jury, ultimately I see one of them start to nod and then another, and before I know it, I'm stirring at 12 bobbing heads. And it's like, oh, I got this chick now.