wavePod

Get Wave AI

S25 Ep15: The Truth Will Always Prevail - Something Was Wrong | Wave AI Podcast Notes

Back to Something Was Wrong

S25 Ep15: The Truth Will Always Prevail

Something Was Wrong

Thu Mar 19 2026

Summary

Podcast Summary: Something Was Wrong – S25 Ep15: "The Truth Will Always Prevail"

Release Date: March 19, 2026
Host: Broken Cycle Media
Episode Theme:
This episode delivers the emotional conclusion of Marissa Root’s journey through the criminal and civil justice systems after her sexual assault by Sione Lund, a college football player. It examines systemic failures at universities, the legal process, the personal toll on survivors, and the power of speaking out. The episode also features powerful courtroom testimony, legal perspectives, and reflections from Marissa and her friends.

Main Topics & Key Discussion Points

1. Recap and Context ([02:00–03:14])

Marissa recaps the winding investigation: mishandled evidence, detective changes, and new hope as her case moves forward for screening and prosecution.
DNA evidence ultimately contradicts the perpetrator’s claim that no sex occurred.

2. Complications with Law Enforcement ([03:14–07:00])

"Detective Smith," the original investigator, leaves the force and moves out of the country—a confusing and alarming development for Marissa.
Marissa shares a tense episode where Detective Smith suggests an inappropriate off-record lunch, alarming the current detective and nearly risking the case’s integrity.
Quote ([04:29], Marissa):
"I wanted to understand better what was going on in her mind and why she wouldn't have put this information in my case file... My mom started to have a really bad feeling... [the new detective said] no, that's so inappropriate. That could completely dismantle Marissa's case."

3. The Road to Charges and Plea Negotiations ([07:00–10:43])

Difficulty locating the perpetrator, who enters rehab for months, causing further delays.
Marissa's priorities: not only jail time, but sex offender registry status as a lasting consequence to protect others.
Quote ([09:37], Marissa):
"As long as he's on the registry, he has to be in some form accountable to what he's doing and his actions... My purpose in all of this was to make sure that he didn't do it again."

4. Civil Action and Systemic Barriers ([14:54–17:27])

Marissa is encouraged to pursue a civil Title IX case; her lawyers stress that only financial consequences press institutions to create change.
Discussion of universities' repeated failures to protect students, especially involving athletes.
Quote ([16:42], Marissa):
"There is no special entitlement for student athletes to get away with sexual violence. They should be held... to higher standards because they're representing the school in the public space."

5. Media Backlash and Victim-Blaming ([17:27–20:23])

After going public, Marissa faces harsh backlash—from victim-blaming to harassment by university football fans.
Harmful myths about survivors are perpetuated; the personal toll is immense.
Quote ([18:35], Marissa):
"To insinuate that this issue was anyone else's problem besides the perpetrator is so disgusting to me... There were so many narratives spinning that were so, so false and so harmful."

6. The Emotional Toll & Community Impact ([20:23–22:08])

Jane, a friend, describes years of emotional devastation and Marissa’s fight for justice.
Both Marissa and her friends recount how the process upended her mental health, social life, and trust in systems.

7. Sentencing Hearing: Victim Impact Statement ([24:51–32:46])

Marissa delivers a moving, detailed victim impact statement in court, highlighting the trauma, social suffering, and ripple effects on her life and those around her.
She directly names harmful rumors, the physical and emotional aftermath, and her commitment to advocacy.
Quote ([25:12], Marissa):
"Those close to Sione created and perpetuated these rumors... If I had consensual sex, I would not run through a house and run down a street without my shoes on... I did everything to indicate I was not consenting."
Quote ([29:50], Marissa):
"But I fought to heal and I fought to get my life back... I want Sione to know that I forgive him. I believe in redemption and I believe people can change... Although his sentence is just a temporary consequence to his actions. I have to live the rest of my life as a survivor of rape. This will forever affect my life in ways that are out of my control... being a survivor of rape is a life sentence and that cannot be erased."

8. Courtroom Proceedings and Judge’s Ruling ([35:01–48:20])

The prosecutor and defense outline the plea deal: 30 days jail, 4 years probation, 10+ years on the sex offender registry, restitution, and a protective order.
Sione Lund apologizes and claims accountability in his statement ([41:04–42:11]).
The judge explicitly rejects victim-blaming narratives:
([44:09], Judge):
"This was not consensual sex... There was not consent. I want to make sure that everyone understands that any statements along those lines to be a revictimization and it's not appropriate and it will not be tolerated."
The full sentence and logistics are announced ([46:15–48:20]).

9. Aftermath, Reflections, and Friend Perspectives ([50:13–56:04])

Marissa reflects on the mixed emotions—relief, pride, but ongoing doubts and public scrutiny.
Jane and Sarah describe the gravity of the courtroom, pride in Marissa, and frustration about the minimal jail time but relief that "finally, a woman was believed and heard."
Quote ([54:02], Jane):
"It's awful, but, I mean, it's pretty well known that they protect their athletes in whatever way possible. And that's absolutely what the U did. And it was a huge injustice towards Marissa."
([56:04], Sarah):
"I will say that we were like 30 days—what? But after everything we've been through... That was better than nothing."

10. Institutional Responses and Looking Forward ([56:22–end])

Marissa describes the ongoing civil case against multiple universities and the Board of Higher Education.
Official statements from the University of Utah and Utah Valley University are read, largely deflecting institutional responsibility for off-campus incidents.

Notable Quotes & Timestamps

Marissa on failing systems:
- "There was a lot of confusion. I didn't really understand why she hadn't put anything in my case file." ([03:15])
On the importance of registry:
- "As long as he's on the registry, he has to be in some form accountable to what he's doing and his actions." ([09:37])
On pushback from fans:
- "There were so many messages that I got, especially from fans of the University of Utah football team, telling me that I was ruining their season..." ([18:08])
Impact statement, confronting the perpetrator:
- "If I had consensual sex, I would not run through a house and run down a street without my shoes on." ([25:50])
Judge’s unequivocal stance:
- "There was not consent... I consider any statements that along those lines to be a revictimization and it's not appropriate and it will not be tolerated." ([44:09])

Emotional and Structural Tone

The episode's tone is forthright and empathetic; Marissa and the host maintain a measured, vulnerable storytelling style, balancing legal specifics with deep, personal emotion. The guests' words reflect exhaustion, grief, anger, pride, and determination. The narrative frames Marissa’s voice and healing as central, despite systemic obstacles and public skepticism.

Summary Table of Key Segments

| Timestamp | Section | Key Participants | Main Content | |------------|----------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------| | 02:00-03:14| Case recap | Marissa | Investigation progress, DNA evidence | | 03:15-07:00| Law enforcement mishandling | Marissa, detectives | Detective leaves, attempted off-the-record meeting | | 07:00-10:43| Road to charges & plea | Marissa | Rehab delay, negotiation, priorities | | 14:54-17:27| Civil suit/systemic failings | Marissa, lawyers | Title IX, universities' obstruction, football bias | | 17:27-20:23| Media backlash & victim-blaming | Marissa | Online harassment | | 24:51-32:46| Victim impact statement | Marissa | Courtroom testimony, trauma detailed, advocacy | | 35:01-48:20| Sentencing hearing & judge ruling | Prosecutor, Defense | Plea details, judicial statement, sentence imposed | | 50:13-56:04| Reactions and reflections | Marissa, friends | Community impact, friends' support, aftermath | | 56:22-end | Institutional response and next steps | Universities | Official statements, civil case lead-in |

Takeaways

Marissa’s resolve and willingness to go public restored a sense of agency, offering hope to other survivors.
Stark divisions remain in how universities and the public respond to sexual assault involving athletes.
Systemic delays, victim-blaming, and legal loopholes underscore ongoing barriers to justice.
The criminal sentence, while seemingly minimal, resulted in a significant registry consequence meant to protect others.
Judge’s strong statement against victim-blaming and in support of the survivor sets an important precedent.

For Listeners

This episode is a thorough, moving, and at times difficult exploration of the aftermath of campus sexual assault, institutional accountability, and survivor advocacy. It contains direct legal language, raw first-person testimony, and a keen call for systemic change. It is essential listening for those interested in justice reform, survivor stories, and the intersection of sports and accountability.

Next Episode Preview The story continues as Marissa pursues her civil case, revealing more about university policies, accountability, and the fight for broader change.

[End of Summary]

Loading summary...

Transcript

A (0:00)

Something Was Wrong is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible financial geniuses, monetary magicians. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds because Progressive offers discounts for paying in full, owning a home and more. Plus, you can count on their great customer service to help you when you need it. So your dollar goes a long way. Visit progressive.com to see if you could save on car insurance, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations.

B (0:37)

Early Birds Always rise to the occasion for summer vacation planning because early gets you closer to the action. So don't be late. Book your next vacation early on VRBO and save over $120.

A (0:49)

Rise and shine.

B (0:50)

Average savings $141 select homes only.

A (0:53)

Something Was Wrong is intended for mature audiences and discusses topics that may be upsetting. Please consume with care this season Discusses sexual, physical and psychological violence. For a full content warning, sources and resources, please visit the Episode Notes Opinions shared by the guests of the show are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Broken Cycle Media. The podcast and any linked materials should not be misconstrued as a substitution for legal or medical advice. The University's responses to our outreach for comment are included within our reporting this chapter. Thank you so much for listening.

B (1:34)

You think you know me. You don't know me well at all.

A (1:41)

You don't know anybody till you talk

C (1:52)

D (1:55)

someone.

A (2:00)

Previously on Something Was Wrong.

B (2:04)

I was put in contact with Detective Smith in our first conversations. I felt really good about her. I thought that she was going to be a really good asset for me. Detective Smith gave me kind of an overview of what happened in their interview, and he basically said that him and I never had sex. That was a huge piece of information because later the DNA would show differently. We got about a year into the investigation. My mom had kind of had it and so she called the police captain. The captain asked my mom my name, goes into his files and is looking and he said, okay. So is she wanting to open an investigation on this? He was on speakerphone, my mom, and my mouth just dropped. The sergeant called me and let me know that a new detective would be put on my case. The next step in the process is to send my case forward to screening. I thought it probably got denied and the new detective just didn't know how to tell me. And she's like, oh no. It went through. And I was beyond shocked.

B (3:15)

Detective Smith was still reaching out to me here and there. I obviously had Hard feelings. There was a lot of confusion. I didn't really understand why she hadn't put anything in my case file. But at this point, I was still kind of thinking maybe she's just really not good at her job, and there was just a misunderstanding. But I was still not really responding to her when she would reach out to me. When I had had a conversation with my prosecutor, I said, well, if we do go to trial, can my old detective come and speak to what she remembers of the interview? And will that give merit to the statement that he gave? The prosecutor said that it would under normal circumstances, but that she was no longer part of the police force. And I said, I thought she just left the Special Victims Unit to a different unit. And he said, no, she's resigned from the police force and she's actually left the country. She's living in Croatia now. I was obviously super caught off guard by this. So he was explaining that if she were to come back into the country, which he said that they could ask her to, she would be speaking as a civilian, she wouldn't be speaking as law enforcement. And law enforcement does have extra merit in the court of law. And because she wasn't part of law enforcement anymore, it. It wouldn't really have the same effect. And when I figured this out, I was really confused. This is when I started really coming to the realization of, oh, something weird might be happening here. I hadn't really talked to her in a long time. I hadn't really been responding, but curiosity got the best of me, and I wanted to know what information she would divulge. And I really just wanted answers. Like, I wanted to understand better what was going on in her mind and why she wouldn't have put this information in my case file. I texted her and I said, my prosecutor told me that she spoke with you. I hope you're doing well. And she said, hi, Marissa. It's so nice to hear from you. I hope you are doing well. I am in Utah for a little while. We will have to catch up. Let me know what works best for you, and maybe we can get together before I leave. I said, I heard you moved, and I need an update on how life is going. I. I'm free next week sometime. What's your schedule like? And she explained her schedule. Detective Smith had reached out to me shortly after that, and she asked me if I wanted to go to lunch. We agreed to go to lunch. She said that she would check in with the DA and make sure that everything was okay on that front for us to go to lunch. And then she said, I'm hoping he doesn't mind us meeting in person. We had decided the day that we were gonna get lunch, and my mom started to have a really bad feeling. And I had a little bit of a bad feeling, but was more curious, and so I didn't really want to listen to that feeling. She ended up calling the new detective, and the new detective absolutely lost it. She freaked out at my mom and just said, no, that's so inappropriate. That could completely dismantle Marissa's case. I don't know why Detective Smith would even offer that. She's worked in this department. She understands that, like, this would be very bad if this were to happen. That added to my feelings of uneasiness about Detective Smith. It just feels very inappropriate. I don't know if it was an emotional attachment that she had to me or if she felt like I was maybe a daughter figure to her. After the phone call that my mom had with the new detective, the new detective actually texted me and she said, hi, Marissa. I know your mom was going to reach out to you regarding canceling your lunch today with the old detective. I wanted to reach out as well. She no longer works for this police department and is now only involved in your case in a civilian capacity. It is not appropriate for the two of you to meet to discuss this case. Even if this was not your intent, it is how the interaction would be perceived. And I just want to quickly say none of this was my intent. It was Detective Smith's intent to meet with me. I also felt like this was a deflection, putting the blame on me that, like, I had set this up. She said your mom mentioned you felt like you had to meet with the old detective so she would cooperate with the case. However, know that the district attorney can compel her to cooperate if necessary. Moving forward, please know it is only appropriate to meet with anyone involved in the investigation in a professional setting, such as the DA's office, and with the DA in charge of the case present. This is simply to protect the integrity of your case and avoid any notion of collusion. I hope this makes sense. I just want your case to move forward as easily as possible. The DA is going to reach out to the old detective and let her know not to contact you again. Thank you. This was the most that the new detective ever said over text. Like, she would hardly have any conversation with me over text. I think she felt really compelled to send that. I do believe that she really felt the negligence of Detective Smith because she was the one picking up the pieces. When my case made it past screening, that's when they felt like they had enough evidence that they could make an arrest. Originally, he was facing two felony counts of rape and forcible sodomy. Knowing that he was going to be forced to take accountability for what he did, that was very validating for me. I think that a big part of me healed that day. Initially, the arrest warrant that went out was a no bail warrant, but somehow that got changed to a bail warrant. There were a lot of months where we were just kind of trying to track him down. That's another thing that's not really like the movies. They don't always just go to their house and present the warrant to them. I remember we started trying to figure out where he was, and finally his lawyer got back to us and had let us know that he was in a rehab facility in a different state. This was super upsetting to me because he was in the rehab facility for several months, and so my case could not move forward until he was out of rehab. This is all strong stuff to present to the judge that he has gone to rehab, sees the error of his ways, so sees that he had an issue. We waited months and months for him to be done with that. Finally, when he was done with rehab, he was arrested. He made bail shortly after, and that's when we started the process of deciding whether we were going to go to trial or whether we were going to do a plea deal. My prosecutor prepared me that the first plea deal that they would present would be something ridiculous. I can't remember exactly what it was, but it was like three misdemeanors. There would have been no jail time, no registry. Then we just negotiate that. We had gone back and forth a few times, and this is over the course of months and months. His biggest thing was that he didn't want to be on the sex offender registry. I thought it would be reasonable for him to be on the registry for what he did to me. As long as he's on the registry, he has to be in some form accountable to what he's doing and his actions. What my prosecutor said is, we can either get more jail time or we can get the sex offender registry. I decided that I would rather have the registry because, again, my purpose in all of this was to make sure that he didn't do it again.

C (24:51)

Thank you for allowing me to share my experience with the court. Since the defendant took a plea deal, I feel it is important to let the court know he knew what he did. He knew I said no, and yet he still raped him. It is important that the court hear these facts because Sione did plead to a lower offence. Although I agreed to this plea because I want closure, it does not change the fact that he is guilty of rape. This plea is not because this case suggests anything less than rape, but because this plea deal means I get to close this chapter. Rumors have been spread that I had consensual sex but regretted it. So I claimed rape rumors that Sione didn't rape me at all, but that we just engaged in consensual activities other than sex. And out of nowhere I claimed rape. This is untrue as his DNA was found inside my vagina. Those close to Sione created and perpetuated these rumors. I did everything in my power to let the courts handle this case. I have been respectful and honest. I spent many nights crying myself to sleep hearing the untrue things being said about me. Knowing the evidence in this case were very strong, but still I suffered privately. To tell the court more about Sione Lund through my experience, I would like to share my only other personal interaction with him prior to him raping me. Sione was intoxicated at his cousin's wedding dinner. I was asked to drive him home. After dropping him off at his home, he proceeded to call me multiple times during the night, all of which I didn't see until morning because I was asleep. When I saw him at the wedding the next day, he stated that he never went inside his house when I dropped him off. Instead, the cops found him wandering the streets in a stupor later that night and decided they would just drop him off at home instead of arresting him. Because in Sione's words, to me, he is Sione Lunde and he has a bright future. This statement has lived in my head for years because after he raped me and did not listen to no, I knew based on his words, he felt he could get away with anything, just as he had in the past. So I want to make it clear. If I had consensual sex, I would not run through a house and run down a street without my shoes on. I would not have cried when I heard Tess on the phone. I would not have participated in a grueling rape kit that took hours of reliving the trauma emotionally and physically, over and over again. I think it is important to note that the side effects of a rape kit last for weeks, even months, due to medications given to prevent STDs and pregnancy. Not to mention the emotional damage done reliving such an event over and over. As you tell medical staff as well as police, if I had consensual sex, I would not have said no repeatedly. I did everything to indicate I was not consenting. I did everything in my power to get to safety as fast as possible. Finally, if I had consensual sex, I would not be standing here today, three and a half years later, still holding strong to the truth that Sione Lundt did rape me. Before this crime took place, I was on a good path in school. I was making good decisions and figuring out what life looked like for me. I was outgoing, social, driven and overall a healthy woman physically, mentally and emotionally. After Sione raped me, I went into a deep depression. I had to decrease the amount of classes I was taking in college, most of which I did poorly in, even failed some. I struggled with my faith. I struggled to know who I was. I started doubting my ability to trust others and make decisions for myself. I numbed my hurt feelings in unhealthy ways. I turned to outside sources to keep me safe because I didn't believe I could keep myself safe anymore. I slowly disassociated from everything. My family and friends would be the first people to tell you that that day changed me and I was unrecognizable. It is hard for me to remember what was happening in my life at that time. I have had to deal with extreme social anxiety and I am now very introverted. I did not trust anyone, not even myself at times. I have lost many friends, including my best friend and her family, who I love dearly. They are closely related to Sione and his family. Although she has told me she believes me, she has understandably had to distance herself because of the intensity of this case. I have been diagnosed with ptsd, depression and anxiety, all of which were not a part of my life prior to sione raping me. This has also been very hard on my family. They are extremely humble and private. This threw them into neighbourhood gossip. They have continually respected the court and the criminal justice process by not speaking about this case with anyone. They did not perpetuate rumors. Although this has been unimaginable for my family and friends, they have stood by my side through every negative thing that has been said about me. Supporting me through many sleepless nights and anxiety attacks, I still struggle with nightmares of Sione raping me. I look for him in his family's faces before I enter every building and every room. I never want another woman to have to experience this kind of trauma at the hands of Sione again. Sione alone raping me has changed my life and giving me a challenge I never asked for. But I fought to heal and I fought to get my life back. I am still in college. I am almost done with my degree. I went to therapy and I will continue to do so. Although I can say I am healing and my future is bright. It has taken three and a half years of my life to get here and I still have a long way to go. I've struggled to understand how Seonae could do this to me when I considered him a friend. I've tried to help him. I've even defended him on occasion. I want Seoni to know that I forgive him. I believe in redemption and I believe people can change. I hope he makes different choices. From this point on, I am now a mother. I will do everything in my power to protect my daughter. And I know that I will raise her to be a strong woman who listens to her instincts. Most of all, I will teach her that no matter how intimidated or scared she feels, no matter what rumors or judgment she faces, the truth will always prevail. Because laying in my bed on the most anxious of nights, that is what a little voice told me over and over for the last three and a half years. Years? One in three women are sexually assaulted. Only 10% of reported rapes that went through a rape kit end in charges. This means that only 10 out of 100 women will go through this grueling process and have some sort of result from it. These are only those who went through the trauma of a rape kit. There are certainly more, many more women suffering in silence. Now more than ever, I want to be a voice to the voiceless. Your honorable Judge Johnson. I just want to be very clear that I consented this plea deal because I want this chapter closed after three and a half years. I just want to move forward. As I said, I forgive Sione Lund. However, that does not mean he doesn't have to take accountability for this crime. That has changed me forever. It is important to me that he spends time in jail to give him time away in the hope that he will think about what he did to me and what he took from from me. I do not want his life to be ruined, but I do want him to learn. Learn that no means no, that women are more than just bodies to rape, that we as women deserve respect, and that he is not pretty to take our bodies just because he desires it. Although his sentence is just a temporary consequence to his actions. I have to live the rest of my life as a survivor of rape. This will forever affect my life in ways that are out of my control. I will overcome these challenges, but being a survivor of rape is a lie sentence and that cannot be erased. Thank you for listening to my voice taking this roof.

D (37:37)

You can see from the presentence report that Mr. Lund completely accepts responsibility in this case. He does not attempt to minimize in any way and of course, nothing that we say here today is going to change what actually happened on the night of this incident. He does recognize the impact that this has had on this route. I was able to share her written statement with him this morning. He's had a chance to read that and of course, he heard what she had to say here today. When there's a sex offense presented to apnp, they do go through and they try to evaluate for the defendant whether or not they take responsibility and kind of what their attitudes are towards the offense. And I've cited in the sentencing memo that they note that he did take full responsibility. He was also able to recognize incorrect attitudes and thoughts that support sexual offending and that he also has a good understanding of sexual offense risk factors and risk management strategies and uses effective risk management strategies on a consistent basis. Basically, you know, the probation department was trying to evaluate is he amenable to treatment? Is he someone who understands how an offense like this happens and is he prepared to take steps to make sure that something like this doesn't happen then? What we do see on since the charge was filed is two years of compliance while he was on pretrial supervision. There certainly is some connection in this case to substance abuse. I think that was certainly a factor, a part of what was happening here. It's no excuse, but it's at least some context as to how it happened. Mr. Lund and his gambling did take significant steps to get him into treatment, into inpatient substance abuse treatment, and to place him into sober living. There were letters and some data about how he's been doing, the intensity of that treatment. And that was part of the whole analysis. As we were trying to come up with a proposal that would be fair and reasonable for both sides. We were trying to figure out how to achieve kind of a resolution that would address a number of different issues. Mr. Lund is very Fortunate. Although he had a very difficult, younger childhood, he has many people who sit support him. His adoptive family who's here now. And they are here basically just to show that they support him in him accepting responsibility, in him getting treatment, him being successful on probation. They are here to support that. Not in any other, any sort of negative way. That's only to support that he take responsibility that he be successful and that that will influence his success on probation. There are many people of color course who appear before you who don't have that kind of support. And he recognizes how lucky he is. Now this. This conviction will trigger a 10 year registration after he completes probation. So he will have likely 13 years of registration on. On the sex offense registry. He will have a felony conviction. He will be on supervised probation. He will have Group B conditions. These themselves, of course, are significant consequences and he accepts those as consequences. Consequences of his behavior. So we're asking you to follow the proposed Rule 11 agreement.

E (42:16)

Okay. Let me Just say a few things. First of all, I am going to follow the, the Rule 11 agreement. And I just want to note at the outset, I think that Ms. Isaacson did a good job in her sentencing, in her sentencing memorandum setting forth the reasons for the Rule 11 Agreement, specifically Mr. Lund's extensive treatment history since this offense, evidentiary issues, and then of course, the State's consultation with Ms. Root. I think the Rule 11 exists for a reason. I have a lot of respect for the attorneys in this case and I know that they were very hard to get to this resolution and I appreciate it and I am going to follow it. I also frankly think that deviating from him, which as I suggested before, would give, would give Mr. Len an opportunity to withdraw his plea is really not in the interest of justice. I don't think that that would serve anyone's interest in this case. So I am going to follow the recommendation. I do want to say a couple of other things, however. Frankly, Mr. Len, the pre Senate's report is, and I know that they were recommending a bit more jail time. It's a pretty positive presentence report. You've been sober for, as you indicated, you've been sober for an extensive period of time, which I think is very positive. You take responsibility, which is not always the case. When I read these presentence reports and I was encouraged to note that you didn't use alcohol as an excuse. You indicated that you were the one who chose to drink that night and that was your choice and you bear the consequences. And I think that that speaks well on your behalf. And I also, Ms. Ison went through this, but I also note that you recognize, or it appears that you recognize the risk factors for sexual offenses. One, of course, in your situation being alcohol. And of course there's, there's no significant criminal history here. So I think that it's an appropriate sentence. I do want to say before I actually impose the sentence. I do want to say, though I was extremely troubled in reading Ms. Root's statement that she's now made in court today that there were suggestions by Mr. Lund's family and friends that Ms. Root engaged in consensual sex and then regretted it. And Mr. Lund, I'm not holding that against you because I don't think she suggested you made those statements. But to the extent that any such statement was made publicly, I find that incredibly troubling. This was not consensual sex. I did the preliminary hearing. We now have a plea agreement. Let me be crystal clear. There was not consent. I want to make sure that everyone understands that going forward, please do not read this sentence as any sort of license to engage in any statements about what you believe may have happened. I want to make sure that everyone understands that I consider any, any statements that along those lines to be a revictimization and it's not appropriate and it will not be tolerated. Mr. Lund, on the sole count of attempted forcible sexual abuse, third degree felony, sentence you to zero to five years in Utah State prison. Suspend now sentence, place you on probation. Supervise the AT&P for 36 months. I'm sorry, 48 months. It's 40 month period with a possible early termination at 24 months. You will serve an initial jail commitment of 30 days with credit for one day served. You will complete, and I know you've already done this in large part, but you will complete a substance abuse evaluation and comply with any recommended treatment. What that means is you will essentially provide what you've already done to your AP coordinator and make sure that that complies with what they need from you. You will obtain a MEL health evaluation and clarifying recommended treatment. You will abide by AT&P, group B sex offender conditions. You are not to use possessive consumed alcohol or illegal drugs or frequent any place where alcohol is the primary item served or sold. Primarily bars and liquor stores, places of that nature. You are not to commit any new offenses. Nothing more significant than winter traffic violations, parking tickets. Ms. Isaacson, is the restitution stipulated?

A (56:58)

The following is University of Utah's reply to our request for comment. Quote Utah Valley University student Marissa Root reported being sexually assaulted by a University of Utah football player at an off campus party in 2019. After Root made an initial report to the University of Utah's Office of Equal Opportunity, staff repeatedly reached out to her to try to ascertain the name of the perpetrator. When the University of Utah learned the alleged perpetrator was football player Sion Lund, he was suspended and removed from the team. Lund pled guilty and was sentenced in 2023. This is a tragic case with far reaching implications for everyone involved. We hope Marissa and the people who love and support her find opportunities for healing from this traumatic experience. The University remains committed to engaging in work to prevent violence from happening in the first place and fostering a trauma informed community where students feel safe, supported and heard. As Judge David Barlow noted in his March 3, 2025 ruling, the university had no involvement or control over the party at the football player's parents private residence. Additionally, reliance on the 2019 Players Policy Manual's general instruction that football players should treat women with respect both on and off campus does not mean that the University has control over the context of virtually every off campus location in which one or more of its athletes attend a private party. Because this record does not supply the required nexus between the University and the off campus party at a private residence, the University cannot be liable under Title 9. End Quote Utah Valley University responded to our request for comment with the following Tiffany in compliance with privacy laws and institutional policy, the University does not comment publicly on individual cases handled through the Title IX process as those proceedings are confidential. To protect the privacy and rights of all parties involved, the safety and well being of our campus community remain our highest priorities. End quote thank you so much to each and every survivor and guest for sharing their experiences with us and thank you for listening. Something Was Wrong is a broken cycle Media production created and executively produced by Tiffany Reiss. Thank you endlessly to our team Associate Producer Amy B. Chesler, Social Media Marketing Manager Lauren Barkman, Graphic artist Sarah Stewart and audio engineers Becca High and Steven Wack, Marissa and Travis at WME AudioBoom and our legal and security partners. Thank you so much to the incredibly talented Abiomi Lewis for this season's cool, gorgeous cover of Glad Rag's original song youg Think youk from their album Wonder Under. Thank you to music producer Janice JP Pacheco for their work on this cover recorded at the Grill Studios in Emeryville, California. Find all artists socials linked in the episode notes to support and hear more. If you'd like to share your story with us, please head tosomething was wrong.com if you would like to help support the show, you can subscribe and listen ad free on Apple Podcasts. Purchase a sticker from our sticker shop@broken cyclemedia.com Share the podcast with a loved one or leave us a review. Want to stay up to date with us? Follow us on Instagram and TikTok at Something Was Wrong Podcast. As always, thank you so much for listening. Until next time, stay safe. Friends.