Podcast
Starbucks Customers’ Harassments
Hosted by Sarai H Ajai · EN
No description available
2episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Starbucks Customers’ Harassment against my Identifications Dated 07-27-16 Part 2
Sep 20, 201600:57:45Tap to summarize1.The Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai argues, Starbucks’ customers have other alternatives, in resolving societal academic ills to fight against deficiencies in any person High Schools’ educational attainments. In procuring those academic ills by allowing those who(m) have deficiencies in their High School educational attainments in relation to taking the General Educational Development (GED) classes, and the examinations, and [or] allowing the employers to offered GED classes, in the workplaces, and [or] offer their potential employees an opportunities in employment contracts, terms and conditions agreements. Such as, offering GED classes to employees during lunch hours, and [or] after work programs. Some Starbucks’ employees, and their customers’ special interest groups are flawed, and ineffective problem solvers in societal decisions-making for which, unintelligible acts arises from their low quality decision-making when surrogating a person without a High School Diplomas towards [a] temporary solutions in another person High School Diploma entitlements on the subject of pacifying societal ills by using the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai’s Identification of Goods, and [or] Identity Instruments as a surrogate, or substitute does not undertake any person who(m) are lack of deficiencies, in a High School Diplomas’ educational attainments. The Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai had become a targeted individual based on some Starbucks’ employees, and their customers’ special interest groups who(m) are acting in an authoritative positons of decision-making indecisiveness, and irresolutions in societal ills that causes continuances discourses, and deliberate indifferences against the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai authentic Identity. 2.Starbucks’ employees, and their customers’ special interests groups have claims their employers are lacking employees with authentic qualifications in educational attainments, employment credentials, and specified skill sets in the workforces labor markets. In order to resolve those employment job qualifications, educational attainments, and specified skill sets those employers are participating deceptive hiring practices. The Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai’s analytics evaluations are established on her experiences as a victim from forged, and fraudulent Identification of Goods, or Identity Instruments in deceptive hiring practices to fill those supposedly untapped labor workforces markets for an employees with forged and fraudulent Identification of Goods, or Identity Instruments in credentials, and educational attainments’ opportunities in vacancies by allowing false personations. The Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai argues those employers are res...
Transcribe →Starbuck Customers’ Harassment against my Identifications Dated 07-27-16 PART 1
Sep 20, 201600:15:44Tap to summarizeAt approximately 12:42pm, on July 27, 2016, the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai was sitting outside Starbucks Store table located at 1979 McDowell suite 113, Naperville, Illinois 60563. Three Starbucks’ customers had sat at the adjacent left table (an African American male sat fronting the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai, in the north direction, a White Caucasian male sat fronting the west direction, and a White Caucasian female sat fronting the south direction). The three Starbucks’ customers had pretended to engaged in business affair while their acts in verbalized sentences contains numerous phases broken off from the original sentences subject matters [conversations] that relates to the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai’s High School Diploma, College Credential, and her Naperville, Illinois’ residency. And how Starbucks’ customers view her as an objectification, and how “they” wants to carry out acts of violates against the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai, if she lived in Chicago, Illinois. The African American male, Starbucks’ customer had stated, “IF YOU LIVED IN CHICAGO, YOUR ASS WILL BE SHOT, KILLED, RAPED, STABBED, OR BEATEN TO DEATH OVER YOU IDENTIFICATIONS.” In his duration of time while sitting at the adjacent table watching the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai, the African American male, was continuously sticking his tongue out at her, and while pretending to engaged in conversations with his associates at the table. The White Caucasian male who sat fronting in the west direction was extremely vocal against the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai’s High School Diploma being used for communities educational attainments subsidies and [or] entitlement programs without her legal acknowledgement, and written and [or] signature authorizations. And their psychological reasons to why these three Starbucks’ customer had acted with malice aforethought in premeditating [ed] criminal intents to commit, and conceal Identity Theft, false personations, and deceptive hiring practices because he had alleged, the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai is a homeless person. Therefore, the White Caucasian male, a Starbucks’ customer’s special interest groups supersedes the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai’s Constitutional Rights to forge and used fraudulent Identification of Goods, or Identity Instruments based on the “Bad Man Theory” of the Bad Man calculated rules, and how much a Bad Man can appeal, the rules for which, supersede Constitutional Statutes before societal force of law against his immoral acts against the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai. The Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai argues their psychological games, or reverse psychology towards, let us pretend, she is a homeless and [or] androgynous appearance person are their justifiably authenticate reasons in superseding her Constitutional Rights in order to motivate their excuses in Identity theft acts against the Plaintiff, Sarai H Ajai’s Identification of Goods, and Identity Instruments in false personations.
Transcribe →