Make America Grift Again

Summary

Strict Scrutiny — "Make America Grift Again" (March 16, 2026)

Episode Overview

The “Make America Grift Again” episode of Strict Scrutiny is a spirited, sharp, and often irreverent deep-dive into the entrenchment of corruption and grift in American political life—focusing on current Supreme Court decisions, executive overreach under the Trump-Vance administration, and a cultural analysis of gender, power, and legal ethics. Hosts Leah Litman, Kate Shaw, and Melissa Murray engage in wide-ranging discussion from the outsized influence of billionaire donors, deregulatory grift, and judicial antics, to the practical fallout on immigration, regulatory enforcement, and gendered governance.

A highlight is a live interview with U.S. Representative Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), who provides on-the-ground insight into immigration, congressional oversight, and the realities behind the headlines in LA.

---

Main Themes, Discussion Points, and Insights

1. Supreme Court-Enabled Corruption & The Era of Grift

The Billionaire Takeover of Elections

• Citizens United’s Legacy ([03:35])
  • Post-Citizens United, billionaire and corporate influence on federal elections has ballooned:
    • “300 billionaires and their immediate family members donated more than $3 billion, 19% of all contributions in federal elections in 2024.” — Leah Littman ([03:35])
    • The share of billionaire money rose from 0.3% in 2008 to ~19% in 2024, with a 5:1 advantage to Republicans over Democrats. — Melissa Murray
    • “Once upon a time, rich people gave roughly comparable amounts to Republicans and Democrats... That is just no longer remotely the case.” — Kate Shaw ([05:08])
• Citizens United Decision:
  • While commonly described as allowing unlimited corporate spending, Kate Shaw clarifies the technicality: “It was a ban on this very narrow period of time right before an election… Even that was too much for the Supreme Court to permit.” ([05:08])

Legalized Oligarchy and Supreme Court Complicity

• Mockery of Judicial Reasoning
  • “We the people, in order to form a more perfect oligarchy.” — Melissa Murray ([07:42])
  • The hosts lampoon the Court’s claim that unlimited corporate expenditures can’t give rise to corruption or the appearance thereof. — Leah Littman ([08:23])
• Case Studies from the New York Times
  • Outlandish local races entirely funded by billionaires; Steve Schwarzman personally boosting a Montana Senate run (campaigns “hugely influential” from outside money).
  • Regulatory capture and exchange of policy for favors tie into themes throughout.

Deregulation for Sale: Live Nation, Ticketmaster, and DOJ Settlements

• Antitrust Case Settlement Casts Shadows of Corruption ([08:52]-[13:20])
  • Trump’s DOJ abruptly settles a major antitrust case mid-trial, alarming the judge and state co-plaintiffs due to weak penalty and surprise timing.
  • Notable: “The damages to the states are capped at less than 1% of Live Nation’s 2025 revenue.” — Melissa Murray ([09:00])
  • Key figures connected to the settlement (Mike Davis, Rick Grenell, Kellyanne Conway) are all deeply tied to Trumpworld and Live Nation becomes a donor to Trump’s transition.
  • Senator Mazie Hirono questions AG Pamela Jo Bondi about the role of lobbyists—eliciting evasive answers ([11:52]).

The Administrative State as a Playground for Patronage

• Presidential Control and Regulatory Gutting ([16:26])

  • The Court’s willingness to expand presidential power over regulatory agencies “is a recipe for corruption” — Leah Littman on the Trump v. Slaughter case.
  • Industry lobbyists (esp. tobacco, crypto, private equity) gain regulatory relief in exchange for campaign support.

• “Deal Doe”:

  • “Deals that actually fuck over the country.” — Leah Littman coins a risqué but pointed term ([20:41]).

• The Pardon Industry

  • The Trump pardon market explodes, with lobbyists making a business out of obtaining pardons for wealthy convicts ([21:03]).

---

2. Gender, Manosphere, and Judicial Dystopia

Masculinity at the Helm: The "Manosphere" Government

• Trump’s Florsheim Shoe Gifting Ritual ([23:34])

  • Trump expresses “cult-like” control by gifting all-male staff his favorite (mid-priced, ill-fitting) Chicago Florsheim shoes. Staffers reportedly feel compelled to wear them.
  • “He is so hot for the shoes that he has a stack of them in the White House.” — Kate Shaw ([24:30])
  • Hilariouly, recipient JD Vance displays the shoes to the President in person.

• Florsheim’s Parent Company Sued Trump Admin—But Leader Disclaims Knowledge of Gift Ritual ([27:55])

  • Company head Thomas Florsheim, Jr., has openly critiqued Trump’s tariffs, showing the strange cross-currents of business, law, and influence.

Misogyny, DEI, and Dysfunction in the Administrative State

• The "Doge Bro" Phenomenon

  • Dogebro depositions reveal ideologically motivated, often clueless gutting of federal agencies by “mediocre at best” men ([38:23]).
  • DEI (Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion) erased via ChatGPT prompts and superficial readings: “DEI means dicks, ex-husbands, imbeciles, incels, idiots, or some combination thereof.” — Leah Littman ([42:50])

• Judicial Antics: Swings Toward Vulgarity and Provocation

  • Ninth Circuit Judge Lawrence Van Dyke authors a dissent beginning “this is a case about swinging dicks, girl.” ([45:31])
    • “My distressed colleagues appear to have the fastidious sensibilities of a Victorian nun... I hope we can all agree it is far more jarring for the unsuspecting and exposed women to be visually assaulted by the real thing.” — Judge Van Dyke ([47:19])
  • The hosts dissect at length this descent into judicial crassness and edge-lord posturing.

Legislative and Bureaucratic Follies

• UFC Fighters Training FBI Agents ([34:08])
  • FBI Director Kash Patel to bring UFC fighters into FBI training, part of a “bleak dystopia” of masculinity at the core of government.
• Voter Suppression and Gender
  • Texas Senator John Cornyn, trying to out-Trump Ken Paxton, advocates ending the filibuster to pass an ID/voter citizenship law likely to disenfranchise women (due to mismatched ID documents post-marriage) ([35:13]).

---

3. Ethics, Legal Accountability, & Supreme Court News

Executive Branch Ethics in Crisis

• AG Pamela Jo Bondi's Ethics Evasion ([49:03])
  • DOJ seeks to insulate its attorneys from state bar investigations.
    • “This is a recipe for DOJ obstruction of any state bar investigations of current or former [lawyers]... I take some small joy in that fact [that they’re nervous].” — Kate Shaw ([50:57])
  • Potential conflicts over Pam Bondi’s brother (a defense lawyer); prompt a congressional call for an investigation into recusals due to familial ties.

Supreme Court: Docket Mechanics, New Offices, and Polls

• Shadow Docket Criticism

  • Justice Jackson bluntly denounces the emergency docket as “not serving the court or this country well... a warped kind of proceeding.” ([54:16])
  • Justice Kavanaugh attempts to both-sides the critique.

• New Supreme Court Defender Office

  • Federal judiciary approves a new public defender office for indigent criminal defense at the Supreme Court level—applauded as a step toward equity ([56:01]).

• Argument & Opinion Recaps ([57:21])

  • Hunter v. United States: Lisa Blatt dominates oral arguments with her signature style. Justice Alito has a “minor temper tantrum” about new questioning formats ([58:20]).
  • Gallet v. New Jersey Transit Corp.: Court limits sovereign immunity for state-operated entities.
  • Orellana v. Bondi: Sustains review of BIA asylum decisions, but under a deferential standard.

• Public Trust in the Supreme Court at Record Lows

  • Only 22% report significant confidence, the lowest since 2000 ([62:34]).

---

4. Live Interview: Rep. Jimmy Gomez — Immigration, Oversight, and LA

Congressional Oversight and Legal Stonewalling

• Spot Inspections Blocked

  • Congress forced new language into appropriations bills to permit surprise visits to immigration detention centers. Trump officials circumvent via bureaucratic tricks (“just making shit up at every single step of the way” — Jimmy Gomez, [64:45]).
  • Gomez helps lead litigation to enforce oversight rights and obtains injunctions to permit congressional entry.

• Detention Centers: Human Consequences

  • Conditions are dire, accountability is rare: more deaths in 2025 than the previous 10 years combined; detainees shuttled or deported to avoid scrutiny; medical neglect is rampant ([68:12]).
  • “They're also hiding what they're doing with people.” — Jimmy Gomez ([68:12])

• SCOTUS Allowing Racial Profiling via Shadow Docket

  • Noem Vasquez Perdomo case: Supreme Court stays an order blocking ICE’s race-based stops; Kavanaugh issues a rose-tinted concurrence claiming all is professional and brief ([70:34]).
  • Gomez: “If you look like me, you look like anybody of Latino descent, you're guilty. And that's what. What they basically allowed to be legal in this country.” ([71:51])
  • Personalizes the harsh effects: his own mother now at risk, families skipping school and medical appointments due to fear ([73:36]).

National Security, Foreign Policy, and Truth Decay

• Iran Policy: Fact-Free Zone ([79:59])
  • Gomez describes an administration that rewrites factual narratives to justify militarism and regime change.
  • Officials who produce inconvenient facts are fired; military moves are driven by shifting and contradictory rationales.

Congressional Dads Caucus: Hope on Policy for Families

• Recasting Carework as a Bipartisan Cause
  • Congressional Dads Caucus (50 members strong, but all Democrats) pursues childcare and family support policy ([84:41]).
  • “We're trying to build this support and box people in and then at the same time, getting dads... to say, dads have a responsibility to take care of our kids, not only at home, but also in the halls of Congress.” — Jimmy Gomez ([84:49])

Notable Ending: Call to Action

• Nine months to the midterms: Listeners urged to get involved early and frequently ([87:26]).

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “We the people, in order to form a more perfect oligarchy.” — Melissa Murray ([07:42])
• “Deals that actually fuck over the country. Wow, Leah.” — Leah Littman (& Kate Shaw) riffing on “deal doe” ([20:41])
• On the “manosphere” government: “Like they all have complexes about their dick size and we are all living with the consequences of that.” — Leah Littman ([27:47])
• “It’s the corruption, stupid, right?” — Leah Littman ([21:42])
• “He is, as always, a messy bitch from New Jersey who leans into the drama.” — Leah Littman on Justice Alito ([59:41])
• “I think of my mom... she was at risk just because of who she is. And that's a reality. And that's what people live in fear in every single day in Los Angeles and across the country.” — Jimmy Gomez ([73:36])

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• 03:35 — Billionaires’ influence post-Citizens United, Supreme Court’s enabling role
• 08:52 — Live Nation/Ticketmaster DOJ settlement, suspicious timing/lobbyist involvement
• 16:26 — Supreme Court, presidential power, regulatory capture
• 20:41 — The “deal doe” theory
• 21:42 — The rise of the pardon industry
• 23:34 — Trump’s Florsheim shoe gifts; masculinity and culture in governance
• 38:23 — “Dogebro” depositions, DEI elimination by fiat
• 45:31 — Judge Van Dyke’s “swinging dicks” dissent; judicial masculinity
• 49:03 — Executive branch ethics and accountability (Pam Bondi, state bar avoidance)
• 54:16 — Justice Jackson and Kavanaugh on the shadow docket
• 57:21 — SCOTUS argument recaps: Lisa Blatt, Justice Alito’s dramatics
• 62:34 — Record low public confidence in SCOTUS
• 63:20 — Rep. Jimmy Gomez interview: Immigration oversight, ICE, and SCOTUS’ role
• 68:12 — Detainee deaths, personal stories, medical neglect in ICE facilities
• 70:34 — SCOTUS shadow docket unleashing racial profiling (Kavanaugh’s magical thinking)
• 79:59 — Iran, congressional intelligence, and government truth decay
• 84:41 — Congressional Dads Caucus and caregiving policy

---

Final Thoughts

"Make America Grift Again" is a tour de force of trenchant legal analysis, bitter humor, and righteous exasperation. Strict Scrutiny lays bare how legal doctrines, court decisions, and political culture have enabled grift, deregulation, and a masculinist, insular approach to governance—with tangible harms for democratic norms, civil rights, and the rule of law. The episode is particularly notable for bridging technical Supreme Court doctrine with lived realities—especially on immigration and gender—and for showcasing the legal weeds with memorable, often hilarious, commentary.

Listeners come away with a panoramic view of both the stakes and the personalities that define contemporary legal and political culture.

---

Transcript

[Melissa Murray]

Strict scrutiny is brought to you by Americans United for Separation of Church and State. Since the nation's founding, the values of religious liberty and pluralism have been central to the American identity, and these values are now under accelerated attack. The government has no authority to pick and choose which religious beliefs to promote and which to marginalize. Religious freedom for only some is religious freedom for none. The Trump Vance administration's Religious Liberty Commission is pursuing a culture of Christian nationalism that seeks to divide and isolate people across our nation. The fatally flawed way this commission was assembled makes clear that the predetermined outcome isn't just un American, it's against the law. The Trump Vance administration has failed to uphold our country's proud religious freedom tradition, and we will hold them accountable, be part of the movement that's pushing back and standing up for freedom. Register to attend today@the srf.org

[Kate Shaw]

support is available 24.

[Melissa Murray]

7 with VRBoCare. We're here day or night, ready whenever you need help because a great trip

[Kate Shaw]

starts with the right support.

[Commercial Announcer]

If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H Vac and plumbing supplies to lighting and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-granger. Visit granger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done.

[Leah Littman]

Mr. Chief justice, please report.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

It's an old joke, but when an

[Kate Shaw]

argument man argues against two beautiful ladies

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

like this, they're going to have the last word.

[Kate Shaw]

She spoke not elegantly, but with unmistakable clarity.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

She said, I ask no favor for my sex.

[Melissa Murray]

All I ask of our brethren is

[Kate Shaw]

that they take their feet off our necks. Hello and welcome back to Strict Scrutiny, your podcast about the Supreme Court and the legal culture that surrounds it. We are your hosts. I'm Kate Shaw.

[Leah Littman]

I'm Leah Littman.

[Melissa Murray]

And I'm Melissa Murray. And on today's episode, we are going to cover some of the legal news of the past week. And we'll also share with you another highlight from one of our live shows in California. This one is from the LA show and it is a terrific interview with Congressman Jimmy Gomez.

[Kate Shaw]

But first, we want to start our coverage of recent legal news by focusing on the corruption that we are seeing from the administration and by walking through the many ways that that corruption is directly connected to the Supreme Court.

[Leah Littman]

We are still working on a name for what obviously has to be and should be a recurring segment. There's so much going on, but people should still be aware of the extent of the grift, even with everything else. So should we call it Court Option? Like Corruption Court Option?

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

No.

[Leah Littman]

Robert's Barons. I know I floated this one before.

[Kate Shaw]

I think that one's growing on me.

[Leah Littman]

Okay. Quid pro Scotus Bevocracy. Okay. Brodus and the Broligarchy Make America Grift again.

[Kate Shaw]

Ah, yeah. Robert's, Barron's, and then this MAGA variation I think are my favorites. Okay.

[Leah Littman]

So I do think I'm struggling at least a little. And it's not because I've been dipping into an Ambien jar, which again, is not a thing that exists certainly in my house. But we welcome your suggestions, listeners, if you have an idea for this segment. But more seriously, last week, the New York Times had a really important story about federal campaign contributions in 2024. And their analysis found that, quote, 300 billionaires and their immediate family members donated more than $3 billion, 19% of all contributions in federal elections in 2024. Billionaire families gave an average total of $10 million each. Most of the money went to Republicans. For every dollar to Democrats, five went to Republicans.

[Melissa Murray]

We should emphasize that that is an enormous change to the electoral landscape. So if you go back to 2008, that's five presidential elections ago. This was the election that Barack Obama won. And coincidentally, maybe, I don't know, it was the last election before the Supreme Court issued its decision in Citizens United versus fec, which struck down the ban on corporations spending their own money to advocate in elections. Because the First Amendment in that 2008 election cycle, the share of billionaire spending was, wait for it, almost 0.3%. Now look at it. And when you look at that escalating number, you have one man to thank for it. John G. Roberts. Thanks, bro.

[Kate Shaw]

Now, I do feel compelled. The way Melissa describes Citizens United is the way the majority describes it. But in Justice Stevens dissent, like he emphasizes, and I just, I think this remains true, it wasn't a ban on corporations. It was a ban on this very narrow period of time right before an election when the spending could be done. They could spend all the other times they wanted to and in all kinds of other ways. They just couldn't do it as themselves for 30 or 60 days before an election. So a modest regulation, and even that was too much for the Supreme Court to permit. But this Times piece is just full of case studies and anecdotes about specific Billionaires and particular races where those billionaires intercede and where their money is hugely influential and is really worth reading in its entirety. The opening anecdote is about the Montana Senate race that unseated the Democratic incumbent, John Tester. It describes how Steve Schwarzman, the billionaire chairman of Blackstone, steered a $150 million investment. So this is before politics, actually, just a business investment to now Republican Senator Tim Sheehy's company. It was like a fire, firefighting from the air kind of company that was struggling until this money helped shore up his business and then helped seed his Senate campaign. Schwarzman later hosted a fundraiser for Shee. He donated $8 million to a PAC supporting Sheehy. 64 other billionaires also donated to Sheehy's campaign. And then there are just details in the Times piece about state races that in some ways, like get even crazier. In Illinois, in the most recent gubernatorial cycle, 87% of the money given came from billionaires. And then maybe just one last observation, which is that the asymmetry that Leah mentioned at the outset, that just way more of this billionaire money goes to Republicans than to Democrats is actually also a pretty new development. Once upon a time, rich people gave roughly comparable amounts to Republicans and Democrats to kind of like hedge their bets. And that is just no longer remotely the case.

[Melissa Murray]

Kate, I feel I have to remind you that it is not unconstitutional to have rich friends who bail out your flailing business and then your business actually improves and you're able to capitalize on those improvements to seed your run for a U.S. senate seat, though you can then go forward with the kind of deregulatory policies that your billionaire friends want. That's not unconstitutional, Kate.

[Kate Shaw]

Actually, every single step in that chain is unconstitutional in my Constitution.

[Melissa Murray]

We the people, Kate.

[Kate Shaw]

I wrote a whole book about it. It's all fine.

[Melissa Murray]

Yep. Yeah, right. We the people.

[Kate Shaw]

Do you have like an annotation in the First Amendment that that sets forth all of the rights that you just described as as obviously flowing from those few? Obviously.

[Melissa Murray]

You'll have to pre order the book to find out.

[Kate Shaw]

Good answer.

[Melissa Murray]

The book is available for pre order at all of your favorite outlets. But again, we the people, in order to form a more perfect oligarchy.

[Kate Shaw]

Actually, that's a good next book. Just like a redlining of the Constitution with a Constitution that they think exists. Maybe let's going to put that on the list.

[Melissa Murray]

Let's put that out there for. For our publishers. We could do that. All three of us could do that together.

[Leah Littman]

Oh, yeah.

[Kate Shaw]

That would be bleak.

[Leah Littman]

Well, the Second Amendment would be in like all caps and bold and underline, except for the prefatory clause. And then, anyways, lots of ideas.

[Kate Shaw]

The thought bubbles where like, you know, you stretch out some and compress other text.

[Melissa Murray]

The ninth Amendment, just big X.

[Kate Shaw]

Totally right.

[Leah Littman]

Exactly.

[Kate Shaw]

Possibilities. Are the 14th amendment also an X?

[Leah Littman]

Right.

[Melissa Murray]

Yeah.

[Leah Littman]

Right. So getting back to the Supreme Court's view of the Constitution, one of the lines that has aged the worst from the court's opinion in Citizens United was the claim about how unlimited corporate expenditures do not give rise to corruption or even the appearance of corruption. Oh, really? Because every day of the second Trump administration gives us an opportunity to revisit that. So let's talk about some of what we saw.

[Melissa Murray]

Just last week in our live show, we actually talked about the litigation that was ongoing between Live Nation and Ticketmaster. Well, guess what? Last week, Trump's Department of Injustice announced that it has agreed to settle the lawsuit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster. Again, this was an antitrust suit challenging the arrangement between the two companies that, according to the lawsuit, contributed to a stranglehold on live music sales. One that weirdly did not redound to the benefit of music fans, but rather redounded to the benefit of the two companies. The settlement, which was announced mid trial, came as something of a surprise to both the court and the 39 states in the District of Columbia which had joined as co plaintiffs in the suit. Notably, the lawsuit had actually survived a motion for summary judgment, meaning that the case would then proceed to a trial. So why does all of this seem to be very corruption adjacent? Well, for one thing, the states are objecting to certain terms in the settlement, like the fact that the damages to the states are capped at less than 1% of Live Nation's 2025 revenue.

[Kate Shaw]

Doesn't sound like a great settlement, just

[Leah Littman]

the tip of the profits. If you were.

[Kate Shaw]

I mean, I'm no expert, but that does sound like a great deal.

[Melissa Murray]

They say you're not getting screwed, but

[Kate Shaw]

you kind of are.

[Leah Littman]

Yeah, y.

[Kate Shaw]

In terms of sort of other, at least circumstantial evidence that this might not be totally on the level. Prior to the settlement, the DOJ antitrust chief, Gail Slater, abruptly left the doj, along with the person who had been her top deputy. So the timing is at least curious.

[Leah Littman]

More circumstantial evidence. Live Nation had hired MAGA nutjob Mike Davis to lobby the administration. The company also named Trump's buddy, Rick Grenell, the current head of the so called Trump Kennedy Center, AKA the Kennedy center for the Performing Arts to its board of directors and hired Kellyanne Conway as a lobbyist. Once again, quite curious.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

No.

[Kate Shaw]

Leah, I can't believe you forgot to throw in the second definite article. The Donald Trump and the John F. Kennedy center for the Performing Arts.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Sorry.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah.

[Leah Littman]

Ye.

[Kate Shaw]

So one other sort of curious fact is that Live Nation donated half a million dollars to Trump's presidential transition fund.

[Leah Littman]

Hmm.

[Kate Shaw]

As one does. As one does.

[Melissa Murray]

Anyway, the DOJ's decision to enter into settlement mid trial during the government's direct examination struck some people as very, very curious, perhaps even in bad faith. According to the presiding judge, it, quote, shows absolute disrespect for the court, the jury and this entire process. The judge then described the surprising turn in the litigation as, quote, unacceptable. And the judge was not the only one concerned about how all of this went down. Here's friend of the pod, Senator Mazie Hirono back in October asking Attorney General Pamela Joe Bondi about DOJ's antitrust posture toward Ticketmaster. This was all before the settlement was announced. Take A Listen.

[Kate Shaw]

On January 30th of this year, the Trump DOJ's antitrust division sued to block the merger of two tech companies. Then well connected lobbyists met with your political deputies who overruled the career staff and approved the merger. So there's a settlement on that. And separately, DOJ sued Ticketmaster last year for monopolizing concert tickets and forcing consumers to pay outrageous fees. Ticketmaster has hired the exact same lobbyist who met with senior DOJ political people regarding the merger of the two tech companies. So my question is, Ms. Bondi, have lobbyists met with your political deputies about the Ticketmaster case?

[Melissa Murray]

Senator Hirono, as I said stated earlier, I am not going to discuss anything that is ongoing. Gail Slater runs the antitrust, I would say, and Gail Slater, if I can finish. Gail Slater is doing an incredible job running my antitrust unit.

[Kate Shaw]

It's highly likely, Ms. Bondi, that the same lobbyists who met with your people basically got rid of the antitrust case.

[Melissa Murray]

Senator, I don't think a lot of people like that you were out protesting

[Kate Shaw]

with antifa right now.

[Melissa Murray]

Notably, in her response, Pamela Jo mentions Gail Slater. As Kate noted, Gail Slater was the antitrust chief who left DOJ just before the settlement was announced. This episode of strict scrutiny is presented by Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Planned Parenthood Health centers are the nation's leading provider of sexual and reproductive health care, including cancer screenings, wellness exams, STI testing and treatments, birth control, abortion and more. Today and every day. Planned Parenthood is committed to providing access to the care, information and resources that people need to make their own decisions about their bodies and their futures. But the Trump administration and Congress want to take away that freedom and force their own personal beliefs on everyone. As part of a years long strategy to ban abortion care and shut down the most trusted name in sexual and reproductive care, they have defunded Planned Parenthood health centers. It's a dangerous attempt to cut off affordable access for millions, especially those with low incomes who rely on Medicaid. These are women, black and Latino communities, LGBTQ people, and those in rural and medically underserved areas. These are the places and the communities where Planned Parenthood health centers are often the only option for care. People across the country are struggling right now trying to afford the high cost of basics like rent, groceries and utilities while healthcare costs are skyrocketing. Stripping people of quality, affordable healthcare is yet another cruelty inflicted by this out of touch administration. Planned Parenthood has never and will never stop fighting for everyone's fundamental right to quality healthcare, regardless of who you are or where you live, no matter what. And they need supporters like you in this fight. You can [e-mail] defend that's plannedparenthood.org defend strict scrutiny is brought to you by Amra Colostrum. True self reliance starts with taking control of your own health. Amra Colostrum is nature's original solution for doing so. Colostrum is packed with over 400 bioactive nutrients that fortify gut health and strengthen immune health to build resilience at the cellular level. Because when you invest in your health, you invest in your ability to show up, think clearly and stay in control no matter what life throws your way. I think we need to get some Amra Colostrum to all of the conservative members of the Supreme Court. And how do I know that the Justices could benefit from Amra Colostrum? Well, since I've started taking armra, I've noticed improved hair and skin health because Colostrum is packed with nutrients that work at the cellular level to ignite inside out transformation for whole body benefits including your hair, your skin, your gut and so much more. And guess what folks, we have worked out a special offer for our Stricti audience. You can receive 30% off your first subscription order. Just go to Armra.comStrict or enter Strict to get 30% off your first subscription order. That's a RMRA.comStrict

[Leah Littman]

back to the Supreme Court. You can pretty much draw a straight line between not just Citizens United and the corporate corruption, but also the court's cases on presidential power and corporate corruption. Recall that when we discussed the Court's pending case and Trump versus Slaughter, that's the any case about whether the president gets to have the power to remove commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission without cause and also every other federal official who leads every other agency as well, except the Fed, because the justices have retirement accounts. We noted that giving the President that kind of sweeping power over the administrative state that itself exercises sweeping regulatory powers over corporations and industries was a recipe for corruption because it allows the president to exercise that power by ensuring that people at these agencies go easy on his corporate stooges and buddies.

[Melissa Murray]

We should also remind listeners that when we covered the Slaughter case, we noted that many of the pro oligarch bros who attended Trump's second inauguration actually headed companies that were being investigated by or were in active litigation with the ftc. Not surprising that those bros want a completely deregulated environment in which to do business. What is more surprising, though, is that it seems like the President of the United States and the Supreme Court are more than happy to deliver it to them.

[Kate Shaw]

And to take another example, in the same vein, last week the FDA announced that it was going to open the door to e cigarettes that come in fruit and candy flavors. So those flavors had previously been restricted out of concerns that they would be marketed to and especially attractive to teenagers. So this about face came in the form of a guidance document that announced that the FDA now will consider approvals for flavored vapes. Now, the document purports to affirm the concern for flavors that appeal to kids, suggest they're likely to approve things that they at least say will be more attractive to adults. They mentioned coffees and mint and teas and spices. But honestly, if you're familiar with teenagers and and tweens and their propensity for like frappuccinos and all things chai, I am not sure this is a distinction that has any hope of actually protecting kids, but stay tuned.

[Melissa Murray]

But you know, Kate, the thing about kids is that they're really young and if they get hit on something early, they can be your consumers for literally their whole lives. I think that has anything to do.

[Kate Shaw]

I think that probably does. And that, in fact, is why previous administrations have tried to protect them and of course, why this administration is happy.

[Melissa Murray]

Honestly, I believe children are our future.

[Kate Shaw]

So do the tobacco market. And in that vein, any guesses as to which industry helped fund Trump's $300 million ballroom or among others, there have been quite a few funders. But in terms of the topic at hand, any guesses? I'll tell you. Tobacco companies, Altria Group and Reynolds American, both of which will benefit from the relaxed regulation of E cigarettes. They're among the companies that have specifically urge the FDA to lessen this regulation, and looks like that's coming through for them.

[Melissa Murray]

They are really straight up selling out the American people and the public interest with a cash for regulatory benefit scheme. It's amazing. Anyway, ProPublica has an astonishing story that compiles so many connections between people in the Trump administration and the industries that those individuals are ostensibly charged with regulating. So. So let's tick through a few examples from that story.

[Leah Littman]

So, Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg founded a private equity firm that just so happens to own several companies that are seeking Department of Defense contracts related to missile interceptors. A firm he's allowed to continue contracting with and to maintain a financial relationship with while at DoD. Trump has appointed more than 200 people who collectively own between 175 million and $400 million in crypto and positions that influence the regulation of cryptocurrencies. This includes Todd Blanche at doj. DOJ has already shut down some investigations into crypto companies, dealers, and exchanges. And, Kate, I have to say, when we were doing the just the Tip of the Live Nation Ticketmaster settlement, I think I came up with a name for what DOJ is doing and what DOD is doing here. It's the deal, Doe.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

Right.

[Leah Littman]

Deals that actually fuck over the country. Wow, Leah.

[Kate Shaw]

Wow, Leah, you've really outdone yourself about our younger listeners. But I think at this point, like,

[Melissa Murray]

I mean, if they were listening when you went to the Tenderloin cave and saw your first pee pee, I think they're gonna be okay with dildo.

[Kate Shaw]

All right, well, did we leave that in? I think we did debate it, and I believe we did it.

[Melissa Murray]

The dildo is what the whole country

[Kate Shaw]

will get effed with kids before noon in broad daylight. It's coming for all of us. Okay, and just maybe one more example, and that is the New York Times recently ran a piece about the booming pardon industry, which I think, you know, is proof positive that Trump actually is the job creator he makes himself out to be. Because the pardon industry has resulted in just a boom for lobbyists who have been essentially facilitating the granting of pardons to very wealthy individuals convicted of crimes, but with cash on hand and hoping to get out of their sentences. I mean, the piece like the ProPublica piece, like the Times piece about the campaign contributions is just real dystopian shit, right?

[Leah Littman]

Like, it's the corruption. Stupid, right?

[Kate Shaw]

Like, yeah, but here it's like, also there's the hiring of social media. It's not just like cold hard cash. It's like all the mechanisms. You're hiring social media influencers. You're trying to get close to Laura Loomer, who is like, Arby's in your pants. Pardon, Maker. Definitely need a parental warning on this one. Although maybe without the context, Arby's in your pants sounds totally innocent.

[Melissa Murray]

I don't know what that means. I genuinely don't.

[Kate Shaw]

Oh yeah, this is an episode. Laura and I do.

[Leah Littman]

Loomer couldn't even really explain it. This was when she was deposed in some of the litigation and they said, you, Laura Loomer said Marjorie Green had Arby's in her pants. What did you mean? And she just said, it's hilarious. I meant she has Arby's in her pants.

[Melissa Murray]

This whole timeline is so fucked up that I'm cheering for Marjorie Taylor Greene.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah, I know.

[Leah Littman]

So messed up.

[Melissa Murray]

Anyway, all right, we should switch to another topic. This is actually truly dystopian. Let's do some other dystopian stuff, maybe in the vein of Margaret Atwood. Recently, listeners, there has been even more evidence for reading what has been happening with this government and with governance through the lens of gender. Again, as Leah explained a few episodes ago, we are living through government by the manosphere of the manosphere. And for the manosphere, a homocracy, if you will. First up, it seems like the devil wears Florsheim. Apparently President Trump is absolutely obsessed with Michael Jackson's favorite shoe brand, the Chicago based brand Florsheim Shoes. Just a little bit about the brand for those of you who are untutored. The company dates back to the 1850s when Sigmund Florsheim, a German immigrant, began putting his old world cobbling skills to work. By 1886, he had become a partner in Greensfelder Florsheim and Company, a men's footwear company again based in Chicago. See what can happen when you don't have ICE doing immigration detention all over the place in a major city. Anyway, the company eventually gave rise to a family company, Florsheim Shoes, that Sigmund and his American born son Milton founded. And they have been making mid priced men's shoes for over a century.

[Kate Shaw]

I am so embarrassed. I am clearly a bad Chicagoan and I'm also descended from shoe salesman in Chicago on the north side. And I can't believe I didn't know about this brand. Maybe they sold it. But anyway, you know who is very familiar with Florsheim shoes? Donald J. Trump, who reportedly gives them as a gift to everyone in his circle and administration. The Wall Street Journal reported that a female White House staffer says that all the boys have them. Interesting. He's giving them to just the boys.

[Melissa Murray]

The only mention to.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

So this is.

[Kate Shaw]

Okay, I guess you guys are coming to Donald Trump's defense here. I don't quite know what to make.

[Melissa Murray]

Well, we're just like facts, Kate. Facts are facts.

[Kate Shaw]

I mean, yeah, I guess there's nobody. No, I mean, females, they're not into trans people, like, high heels and very lady shoes. So I guess that's. I guess that makes sense. Anyway, the Journal reports that he is so hot for the shoes that he has a stack of them in the White House. Although I also just find this whole story so puzzling because he is famously really cheap. And so do we think he actually went out and spent thousands of dollars on shoes to gift or receive them from one of the many benefactors we were talking about earlier in the conversation?

[Leah Littman]

I don't know.

[Melissa Murray]

So part of the story is that the shoes often do not fit.

[Kate Shaw]

Right. Okay.

[Leah Littman]

So that's also considerably cheaper than other shoes they might otherwise be wearing.

[Melissa Murray]

Right, Right.

[Kate Shaw]

So he's downgrading.

[Leah Littman]

Right.

[Kate Shaw]

All right, all right. So in any event, he gives them the shoes. And the Daily Beast reports that staffers basically say it's the case that everybody's afraid not to wear them. One official was reportedly, quote, rankled that he had to shelve his Louis Vuittons and replace them with the sensible leather footwear.

[Leah Littman]

There is.

[Melissa Murray]

That's how I feel about downgrading from Barack Obama to this.

[Leah Littman]

This is insensible leather footwear.

[Melissa Murray]

I know, but, yeah, same idea.

[Kate Shaw]

When just the downgrade.

[Leah Littman]

Yes, it definitely downgrade. When the New York Times visited the White House in December, Tweedledum and Tweedledumber JD Vance and Marco Rubio gleefully showed reporters the shoes that Trump had bough them, and, quote, Vance lifted his leg in the air to show the President the pair he was wearing. End quote. I cannot even imagine this scene. And Trump allegedly ordered the footwear after stopping a meeting to criticize Rubio and Vance's, quote, fucking shoes. According to Vance himself, those who have

[Melissa Murray]

been gifted the shoes include Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and I'm just going to say, if you have more than one nanny going with you to Epstein's island, you can probably afford to buy yourself a pair of shoes, among other things.

[Leah Littman]

Well, he can afford, but it's a cult, so he has to wear them.

[Melissa Murray]

Clear? Clear.

[Leah Littman]

This.

[Melissa Murray]

What do we call this?

[Leah Littman]

We call this the Shunitary executive.

[Melissa Murray]

Yeah.

[Kate Shaw]

Leah, you were on fire today.

[Leah Littman]

California did have Emma's Women's History Month rock ride this morning, which I love. And I've also been listening to Casey Musgrave's new single Nonstop since early this week. And I feel like those two things really kind of revved me up.

[Kate Shaw]

How long was the Emma ride?

[Leah Littman]

30 minutes.

[Kate Shaw]

30.

[Leah Littman]

So manageable. Anyways, the Magahee men have really been on one as of late. So in addition to this gifting of the shoes Trump reported reportedly just asks these guys their shoe size and they shout something out. And now there are all of these photos on the Internet of these dudes stomping around in shoes that are way too big for.

[Melissa Murray]

I didn't realize he asked them. And they're lying about their shoe size.

[Leah Littman]

They're lying about their shoe size. Happy Women's History Month again. It is all about gender. You can basically understand everything that is going on through these lens.

[Kate Shaw]

Like.

[Leah Littman]

Like they all have complexes about their dick size and we are all living with the consequences of that.

[Melissa Murray]

Oh my. I mean, wow. I genuinely did not know that. Another quick update from the manosphere, and this does seem like a gift of pettiness along the lines of what Leah just related. So this is just in time for Women's History Month. Apparently, Florsheim's parent company, the Waco Group, is among the businesses and corporations that that sued the Trump administration over tariffs. And in fact, Waco is now seeking a refund from the federal government over the tariffs that it paid fine last month when the Supreme Court invalidated the tariffs. The head of the Florsheim company, Thomas Florsheim Jr. He's the CEO of that parent company, Waco, co authored a piece that was published in the Contrarian, and the piece was titled Business Leaders Welcome SCOTUS Tariffs Decision. He's also gone even further with his critique of the tariffs and his embrace of the Supreme Court's decision. Two weeks ago, in an interview with Spectrum News, Florsheim averred that the Trump tariffs had really hurt the business. According to him, at one point, the tariffs actually exceeded the price of the shoes themselves, forcing the company to shift their production from China to India. But then India got sacked with a bunch of tariffs and they were back to square one. All of this tariffing, he says, has made business planning absolutely impossible. So with all of this in mind, you'd think that maybe Florsheim might be a little excited about the fact that his brand is at the top of POTUS list of favorite things. But when he was asked about the president's gifting habits, Mr. Florsheim said he was unaware of the president's gifting practices and he politely declined to comment. Went further as Mariah Carey said, I don't know her.

[Leah Littman]

This should have been the response of the men's hockey team, but I mean,

[Melissa Murray]

I just want to go buy some Florsheim shoes now. I know that he likes them, but like this guy is standing on business. Thomas Florsheim of the Waco There are

[Kate Shaw]

the occasional unexpected heroes in this timeline, and I think Flor may be one of them.

[Melissa Murray]

There's no business like shoe business, he said. And he's here for it. Okay, strict Scrutiny is brought to you by Wild Alaskan Co. I love seafood, but quality has always been a concern for me. I used to question everything from nutrition and taste to sustainability until I discovered Wild Alaskan company especially their Pacific Cod which I love, love love. The Wild Alaskan Company is the best way to get wild caught, perfectly portioned, nutrient dense seafood delivered directly to your door. And trust me, you have never tasted fish this good. Why should you buy sustainable wild caught seafood? Well, it matters because one seafood is a great source of protein, other nutrients that you need and you want it to be wild caught because you don't want the farm stuff like that's the stuff that doesn't have the nutrients in it that's not really sustainable and not great for the environment. Instead, wild caught seafood is the way to go because when it's 100% wild caught, never farmed and sustainably sourced it means there are no antibiotics, no GMOs, no additives to just clean real fish that supports healthy oceans and fishing communities and a healthy you. It's also nutrient rich and full of flavor. Wild Alaskan fish is frozen off the boat to lock in taste, texture and nutrients like omega 3s and your membership in the Wild Alaskan Company delivers a flexible shipment. Expert tips for cooking and truly feel good seafood. What is not to love? And guess what? You can try it risk free 100% money back back guarantee. If you're not completely satisfied with your first box, Wild Alaskan company will give you a full refund. No questions asked, no risk, just high quality seafood. So get on this fishing boat because not all fish are the same. Get seafood that you can trust. Go to wildalaskan.comstrict for 35 off your first box of premium wild caught seafood. That's wildalaskan.comstrust for 35 off your first order. And many thanks to Wild Alaskan Company for sponsoring this episode. Strict Scrutiny is brought to you by Babbel why do most of us want to learn a new language? It's probably not because we love memorizing grammar tables or we want to top some leaderboard somewhere. It's because we want to speak it. We want to get out there in the real world with real people and start communicating. And guess what? Babbel gets you there and it gets you there fast. Learning a language with Babbel is all about small steps, big wins and progress. You can actually track and feel their bite sized lessons fit easily into your daily routine. You can do just 10 minutes a day and it's enough to start seeing real results. Their courses are designed by over 200 language experts who are real human beings who teach you the relevant words and phrases that you will actually use. You'll build the confidence to speak up when it matters, from ordering coffee to chatting with new friends abroad. And Babbel also offers a large collection of podcasts where Babel experts reveal language secrets and offer an inside look at local cultures. I'm telling you, I love Babel Babel because it's great when you're going on a trip and you want to just get up to speed on the basic phrases that you'll need so you can communicate with people in this new country in a way that is respectful and honors their culture, their community and your decision to try and be a part of it. Even if it's only for a short amount of time. Babbel adapts to your learning style and keeps you motivated with personalized plans, real time feedback and progress tracking. So make fast lasting progress with Babbel, the science backed language learning app that actually works. Babbel has over 25 million subscriptions sold worldwide and it has 14 languages that you can choose from. Something for every vibe. Every course also comes with a 14 day money back guarantee. And guess what Stricties. Here is a special limited time deal just for you right now. You can get 60% off your Babbel subscription at babbel.com strictly strict. Get up to 60% off at babbel.com forward/strrict. That's spelled B A B B E L.com forward/strrict rules and restrictions may apply.

[Kate Shaw]

Okay, a handful of additional dispatches from Government of The manosphere. God. More bleak dystopia. The FBI director, Kash Patel has announced that UFC fighters will now be either routinely or like just as some kind of, I don't know, shtick training FBI agents. I'm not quite sure what the full scope of it is, but really disturbing.

[Leah Littman]

This is a time. This is a place. What better occasion?

[Melissa Murray]

I was going to say this actually makes a lot of sense. No, but, no, that Mark.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah, but he. FBI. You know, this is like, I feel like.

[Melissa Murray]

No, no, no.

[Kate Shaw]

Do you think Mullen wants it on this?

[Leah Littman]

It's a.

[Melissa Murray]

It's a unitary executive.

[Kate Shaw]

Ok. I'm just saying he might want people to get in on the UFC as well.

[Melissa Murray]

I mean, this is Mark Wayne Mullen's moment. Like, you did not have no space between your first and middle names for nothing. Like, this is where he is going to add value. This is the first time, I think, that anyone in this cabinet may actually be trained to offer real assistance to another agency or their own agency for the purposes that they are ostensibly charged with deploying. This might be it.

[Leah Littman]

Jokes write themselves.

[Kate Shaw]

All right. In more news from the manosphere, Senator John Cornyn has apparently abandoned his longtime support for the legislative filibuster in order to grovel before Trump to get his endorsement in the Republican primary runoff that he is now facing against Ken Paxton. The two went to a runoff when Cornyn, who is the incumbent, was challenged and failed to clear the threshold in the primary and now says he supports abandoning the filibuster in order to pass the Save America Save act, which, just as a reminder, is a series of voting requirements, including voter ID requirements and voting restrictions, including one that requires all registering voters to provide proof of citizen that contains their current name. And a lot of people have observed that this requirement may serve to, and may even be an effort to disenfranchise the millions of women who either don't hold a passport or don't have a birth certificate that reflects their married name. And obviously because it would likely disenfranchise millions of people, the president is super into it, meaning that John Cornyn is apparently now super into it as well.

[Leah Littman]

You would think that running against someone whose corruption is so extreme it actually generated an impeachment in Texas, like against an impeached perfidious adulterer whose wife has sought a divorce on biblical grounds, would be enough to secure an electoral victory. But here we are.

[Melissa Murray]

Here we are. More news flashes from the manosphere. Last week, the Pentagon barred press photographers because they had released, quote, unquote unflattering photos of Pete Hegseth the most surprising aspect of this story is that not all photographers were actually barred. Yes, you can laugh there. In other news, the Department of Defense has refused to provide escorts for ships that are operating in the Strait of Hormuz because the DoD says that the area is, quote unquote, too dangerous. Which is weird because the President of the United States recently had this to say about conditions in the Strait. Take a listen. Are you Talking to the CEOs of various oil companies, encouraging them to use this freighter for yeah, I think they should. I think they should. I think they should use and look, we took out just about all of their mind ships in one night.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

We're up to boat number 60.

[Melissa Murray]

I didn't realize that that big a

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

navy, I would say it was big and ineffective. But every one of their ships, just about all of their navy is gone at bottom of the sea

[Kate Shaw]

laid any minds in the straight up or movie?

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

We don't think so.

[Melissa Murray]

So very very unitary love.

[Kate Shaw]

It really is a theme this week. Okay, so maybe last piece of big news from oh no it's not.

[Leah Littman]

It's not the last. Don't over promise. The man was really the manosphere is

[Melissa Murray]

the gift that keeps on giving.

[Kate Shaw]

History Month.

[Leah Littman]

They went all out.

[Melissa Murray]

They sure did.

[Kate Shaw]

It's not even half over yet either. Okay, fine, not the last, but in some ways the like most insane piece of manosphere news. No, not even.

[Melissa Murray]

Kate,

[Kate Shaw]

Let me just tell you what I'm going to say. We got a series of Doge bro depositions this week. These came as part of one of the cases, one of the many cases challenging Doge's destruction of various aspects of and divisions of the federal government. And I just have to say if you're interested in going beyond sort of ambient levels of rage to full on incandescent rage, you should watch some of the videos of these clueless man children who spent part of the last year destroying much of the American government in ways that we will probably feel for the rest of our lives. So we're just going to bring you a couple of highlights slash lowlights. Let's start with this clip from a case involving the National Endowment for the Humanities.

[Leah Littman]

These moments from one of the depots also speak to just how unitary our executive is, which is to say not so unitary at all.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

Do you have an understanding for about who is creating the directives and the priorities for your team to address? Elon had made it clear that there was a number of small agencies that needed Doge leads.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Okay,

[Interviewer/Moderator]

so him. Okay. Your understanding is that Elon Musk kind of created the idea for the work that your team was engaged in based on the executive order. Right. Okay.

[Kate Shaw]

This is a sample of Nathan Kavanaugh. And this is with a C. So no relation, except spiritually to SCOTUS pro Brett Deposition.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

You don't regret that people might have lost important income to.

[Kate Shaw]

No.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

To support their lives?

[Kate Shaw]

No, I think it was more important

[Interviewer/Moderator]

to reduce the federal deficit from $2 trillion to close to. Did you reduce the federal deficit?

[Kate Shaw]

No, we didn't.

[Leah Littman]

So we've talked about boy math. There definitely seems to be some of that here. But also is this boy Rocracy? Like, these guys are all the things they accused bureaucrats of being. Incompetent, clueless, out to lunch, dumb. I mean, these guys basically went into the Iran war with a fuck around and find out approach. Like the Strait of Hormuz mines, the global oil market. Oh, yeesh. Never thought of that one. Honestly. Honestly, a part of me wonders if, like, they're going to get, like, homophobic with the Strait of Hormuz and start calling it like the gay of Hormuz or something. Like, this is the insane levels of their approach to government and it is just the overconfidence of mediocre white men as a model for governments. Like, this is government of the manosphere. But more dogebro depositions. Here's a mashup/mixtape404 media made of Dogebro. Justin Fox explaining why what DEI is.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

How do you interpret DEI? There was the EO explicitly laid out the details. I don't remember it off the top of my head. It's okay. I'm asking for your understanding of it. Yeah, my understanding was exactly what was written in the eo. Okay, so can you. I don't remember what was in the eo. So right now do you have an understanding of what D.E.I. is? Yeah. Okay, so what's your understanding as you sit here today in this deposition? Well, it was exactly what was written in the eo. And so anytime that we would look at a grant through the lens of complying with an executive order, we would just refer back to the EO and assess if this grant had relation to it. Okay, but I guess stepping back from your methodology strictly in terminating the grants, do you have an understanding as you sit here today of what DEI means?

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Yeah.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

Okay, so what's your understanding of what it means? Well, it is exactly what was written in the eo. Okay, so. And I don't have the EO in front of me. But that was. We would always reference back to the EO and make sure that this grant was in compliance with the eo. I understand that. Okay. But I'm not asking necessarily about what was in the eo. I'm asking very specifically about your present understanding. Of what? Of dei. Do you have a present understanding of dei? Okay. Can you explain what that present understanding is? Well, it is just easier for me to be referencing back to the eo.

[Leah Littman]

Obviously, he was wrong and he needs to listen to this podcast because he would know that DEI means dicks, ex husbands, imbeciles, incels, idiots, or some combination thereof.

[Melissa Murray]

As the New York Times reported, the Doge Bros used ChatGPT to scan contracts for DEI and one of the prompts that they used was quote, from the perspective of someone looking to identify DEI grants. Does this involve DEI respond factually in less than 120 characters with yes or no followed by a brief explanation, end quote. Literally. This is the CHAT GPT version of

[Leah Littman]

the Guy with Butterfly.

[Kate Shaw]

So the Doge staffer in this mashup was apparently convinced, among other things, that a project about a woman's experience during the Holocaust was an example of forbidden DEI content. And I will just say that again, a movie about women during the Holocaust was, quote, dei, and so the grant had to be canceled because women are. Are illegally woke, especially in the month of March.

[Leah Littman]

Yeah, as is the Holocaust. So the entire Doge thing is really, to me, the same vibe as having Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, like, mediocre at best. But these depositions are, on a happier note, a testament to something litigation can do, even if that litigation doesn't result in a judgment that completely stops or fixes all of the harm. The American Historical association, one of the plaintiffs in this particular case, made these depositions publicly available on YouTube for all to see. These Doge Bros asses hanging out like future employers of America. Please bookmark these videos. And again, people, I mean, can we

[Melissa Murray]

stop and just say there's one thing a historian group is gonna do and

[Leah Littman]

that's make a fucking Barkchit? Yes. I am so glad. So glad they did. After we finished recording, a judge ordered the videos be taken down from the Internet because we can't have nice things, but this is the Internet, so they're still available. Back to our regular episode. Speaking of body parts hanging out, we do have more on the manosphere this time from the judicial branch of the manosphere. So Judge Lawrence Van Dyke of the Ninth Circuit, the amisexual who made a video dissent in a gun case. That video descent showed the judge assembling a gun. Check it out if you haven't. But not to be outdone by his own video dissent, Judge Van Dyke authored a dissent that began, and I quote, this is a case about swinging dicks, girl.

[Melissa Murray]

I'm just glad that he did not videotape because restraint.

[Leah Littman]

Because restraint. Because he really could have.

[Kate Shaw]

He confined himself to the written word here. And yeah, I guess, all blessings, it's a traditional dissent.

[Melissa Murray]

I mean, the content isn't traditional, but it isn't a traditional dissent form, which I appreciate.

[Leah Littman]

I want to know why these guys are so obsessed with genitalia.

[Melissa Murray]

Okay, I think.

[Leah Littman]

Yeah, right. I guess we did touch on that earlier. But the case in which this dissent appeared involved a sex discrimination challenge to a nude spa that would not admit a pre operative trans woman or women. And the ninth Circuit concluded the business likely was in violation of various non discrimination ordinances. And Judge Van Dyke really whipped it all out in response. So after that open opening sentence, the following lines also appeared in his dissent. You may think that swinging dicks shouldn't appear in a judicial opinion, you're not wrong. But as much as you might understandably be shocked and displeased to merely encounter that phrase in this opinion, I hope we can all agree that it is far more jarring for the unsuspecting and exposed women to be visually assaulted by the real thing. Sometimes it feels like these supposed adults in the room have collectively lost their minds, woke regulators and complicit judges seem entirely willing, even eager, to ignore the consequences that their Frankenstein social experiments impose on real women and young girls.

[Melissa Murray]

All right, this is where the courts and the executive are intersecting, because this is the language of all of those Trump administration eos. I will also note that Judge Van Dyke in his dissent notes that the owners of the spa that won't admit the pre op trans person are Christian. So this is also the intersection of. Of the whole First Amendment with substantive due process and anti discrimination. All of those things.

[Leah Littman]

But because the judge is such a gentleman, he did take a beat to respond to his colleagues who thought his dissent was maybe just a little too edge lordy for Article 3. And here's what he had to say. Quote, my distressed colleagues appear to have the fastidious sensibilities of a Victorian nun when it comes to mere unpleasant words, in my opinion, end quote. He also contained, quote, the fact that so many on our court want to pretend that this case is about anything other than Swinging dicks is the very reason the shocking language is necessary. The panel majority uses slick legal arguments and deflection to studiously avoid eye contact with the actual and horrific consequences of its erroneous opinion.

[Kate Shaw]

All right, well, that was a truly shocking piece of judicial writing. And I guess we have the Victorian sensibilities of the majority of the ninth circle, according to Judge Van Dyke. And I think even, even Trump, I think, doesn't want this. Like, I don't know exactly who he's speaking to with this kind of opinion. I imagine like the guy in the Oval Office. But I don't think anyone wants to read this, quite honestly.

[Melissa Murray]

I don't know. I think the whole, like he says, what he means, he's plain spoken. Like that's the kind of lane this occupies. And if you're auditioning to be America's next top justice, maybe this is where it's at. You've got got. I mean, he has true portfolio now. He has visual media. He has written.

[Leah Littman]

It's like EL Wood's application to Harvard Law School.

[Melissa Murray]

Yes.

[Kate Shaw]

Literally in the attention age, this is how you get on the Supreme Court. It's possibly just needs a podcast. Is that dispiriting? Oh, Melissa, don't call that into being.

[Melissa Murray]

Well, I, I've seen if there is

[Kate Shaw]

going to be a first sitting federal judge to launch a podcast. It's probably.

[Leah Littman]

Do not count out Jim Ho.

[Melissa Murray]

I think that's probably right.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah, it's true.

[Melissa Murray]

You heard it here first. Let's delve in a little further on the issue of ethics and governance in the executive branch. And we'll do this before we turn squarely to the Supreme Court listeners. Our favorite attorney general, one Pamela Jo Bondi, has decided that there is a problem with DOJ and ethics. True. Specifically, though, she believes the problem is that DOJ lawyers might be too ethical and too hemmed in by those pesky state bar associations that police police ethical standards for the profession. Pamela. Joe, you are almost there.

[Kate Shaw]

You were so close.

[Melissa Murray]

So close.

[Kate Shaw]

Right. So what Melissa is alluding to is the fact that DOJ is trying to exert more control over state bar ethics probes that can result in disciplinary actions against federal government lawyers. State bars can actually be pretty important accountability institutions. People might recall that state bars had some success in meeting out some professional sanctions against lawyers who had assisted in trying to undermine or overturn the 2020 election. And so, of course, as accountability instit, Bondi wants to go after state bar associations, DOJ proposed a new regulation that would let it let DOJ intervene in state bar disciplinary investigations, including with the authority to review allegations against DOJ lawyers first, and essentially divest those bar associations of jurisdiction over those matters while DOJ is like running its own investigation, which I'm sure will be a very serious one. It just, it's pretty obvious that this is a recipe for DOJ obstruction of any state bar investigations of current or former. Because I. The regulation, or at least the proposal extends to former DOJ lawyers. So I think the one silver lining here is I feel like it does actually sound like people over there are like a little bit nervous about bar associations now or in the future going after Justice Department lawyers who engage in unethical conduct. And you know, I take some small joy in that fact.

[Melissa Murray]

Okay, so take small joy in that. But I mean, federalism just took a seat on the couch and would like

[Leah Littman]

a word like Pamela Joe Bondi, but butterfly mean is this federalism?

[Melissa Murray]

But you know, but do you think this is a result of the D.C. bar association refusing to make her brother the president because, remember,

[Leah Littman]

precipitating reasons for this proposed regulation? You know, among others, Deputy AG Todd Blanch and former DOJ official and now Judge Emile Beauvais, dark lord of the Third Circuit, have faced ethics complaints and state bar organizations.

[Melissa Murray]

Hmm. Also to be added to this list of individuals facing state bar association complaints is our favorite friend of the pod, former USA Dick, Ed Martin. There is a complaint that actually stems from his time as the acting USA Dick. The bar complaint says that Martin engaged in misconduct when he sought to punish Georgetown University Law center for things related to dei. This is the non Dick's ex husbands and implications, this old version of dei. But obviously Ed Martin was engaged in the new form of DEI when he was trying to punish Georgetown University Law center for engaging in dei. I guess. The complaint from the Bar association accuses Martin of conducting unauthorized ex parte communications with a judge, among other things. Let's take one more beat on ethics, the DOJ and House Bondi. I know we just mentioned the fact that Pam Bondi's brother once ran to be the president of the D.C. bar Association. Well, guess what? He didn't win, but he's still in the news. We could have added this to the grifting segment, but it might as well be put here as well. Last week, two Democratic lawmakers, Senator Adam Schiff and Representative Dave Min, a former law professor, asked the U.S. department of Justice's watchdog to review whether U.S. attorney General Pam Bonney has properly recused herself from cases that involve clients of her brother Brad Bondi, who is a partner of Pulse Hastings.

[Leah Littman]

So in their letter, Schiff and Min said that in January, brother Bondi posted on LinkedIn several victories he and his team won in 2025, including one on behalf of Nikola founder Trevor Milton, who was convicted of fraud in 2022 and then pardoned by President Donald Trump last year. Other defendants Bondi represented had their criminal cases delayed unnecessarily or dropped. Dropped the letter, then said, quote, given the troubling pattern at the Department of Repeated Interventions or dismissals in cases involving brother Bondi, although they called him Mr. Bondi, we are concerned that DOJ officials, including the attorney general, may have failed to ensure the independence of internal accountability mechanisms. Hmm.

[Kate Shaw]

So there are lots of things that could potentially have triggered this decision to change the rules surrounding state bar associations, like maybe many of the above. But I will also just say that the conservative legal movement has actually been gunning for state bar associations, associations and kind of accountability for federal government lawyers since the Reagan administration. Deborah Pearlstein has a forthcoming book that actually goes through the history of this. It's fascinating. I mean, she had an op ed in the Times this week about this latest regulation. And so it's maybe these things like spur them to actually do it now, but like the roots are building. Totally. All right, should we move on to scotus?

[Melissa Murray]

Why not? So, folks, at a public event Last Monday in D.C. just Justices Jackson and Kavanaugh had an exchange about the court's shadow docket. The exchange was teed up when the moderator of the event, a federal judge, asked the justices about our friend Professor Steve Laddick's fantastic book the Shadow Docket.

[Kate Shaw]

And KBJ had some things to say about the shadow docket. So she suggested that the emergency filing numbers would decrease if the court didn't grant as many of the emergency applications that were filed. Does seem like sort of a supply and demand, you know, concept here. Also generally said, quote, it's not that is the shadow docket is not, quote, serving the court or this country well. And she referred to the court's involvement as a, quote, real unfortunate problem that reflected, quote, a warped kind of proceeding. Now this is not breaking news. If you have read her dissents in many of the court's shadow docket grants. But it is still striking to hear her speaking in a different register like in a public forum as opposed to in her written opinions, making clear just how she serious a problem she thinks this is.

[Melissa Murray]

Yeah.

[Leah Littman]

And Brett, for his part, intellectually outmatched, obviously attempted to Both sides the issue. He noted that the court also granted some requests on the shadow docket that were brought by the Biden administration. Now this happened at a remarkably lower rate and where lower court rulings were truly unhinged, like barring the federal government from having any communications with social media companies. But no matter. He also, as ever, made the court out to be the victims here, saying, quote, none of us enjoy this. And by this he obviously meant following precedent, normal judicial process and the rule of law.

[Melissa Murray]

Boo hoo.

[Leah Littman]

But so hard on you, I'm sure.

[Melissa Murray]

All right, let me switch gears. We never get to do anything related to SCOTUS that we actually like. But there is actually some positive news. It has been reported that the federal judiciary approved the creation of a new Supreme Court Defender office to help with the representation of indigent defendants. The idea seems to be that the office will serve as a counterweight to the US Solicitor General in federal criminal cases and that it is an effort to close the quote unquote advocacy gap between federal prosecutors and criminal defendants who appear before the court. It is a dedicated office that will aim to offer a comprehensive global view on criminal defense defense and a ready made set of resources accessible to criminal defense lawyers. Obviously we are excited about this development. We'll see how it plays out and as the details get worked out. But we just want to commend all of the individuals who work so hard to make this happen and to say plus one, we are on board too.

[Kate Shaw]

So let's briefly turn to argument recaps. We wanted to just note the other arguments the court heard the same week that it went wild on guns and drugs in the United States versus Hamani. We covered him on in depth at our west coast live shows.

[Melissa Murray]

Yeah, we literally went all the way

[Kate Shaw]

to the bottom of the AMB jar in those live shows we did. Which meant we didn't have a chance to really talk about at all about the other two oral arguments. So we're going to briefly cover them now.

[Melissa Murray]

Okay. The first oral argument was in Hunter versus United States. And in that case, the court is considering the scope of appellate waivers. Appellate waivers concern the rights that defendants give up when they sign a plea agreement waiving the their right to appeal. And in Montgomery versus Caribbean Transport, the court is considering whether federal law precludes state common lawsuits against a broker who allegedly negligently selected a motor carrier.

[Leah Littman]

The argument in Hunter was just wild. If you ever listen to oral arguments, I would definitely recommend listening to this one. And part of why we at least wanted to Mention this one is the case was argued by one Lisa Blatt, which meant we were again treated to the Lisa, a Blat show of interrupting justices and talking to them like they're real people. And she was really on another level in this one. And honestly, the federal government lawyer was, too. But here is an exchange that was in a slightly different register that also kind of made my skin crawl, so naturally had to share it.

[Kate Shaw]

I like that. I mean, yeah, that sounds good.

[Melissa Murray]

I hadn't heard that one, but. Yeah, but I just think in terms

[Interviewer/Moderator]

of just four circuits. That's the four circuits standard.

[Kate Shaw]

I'm just trying to get Justice Alito's vote. And what I'm trying to say to Justice Alito is, I care about the

[Melissa Murray]

rest of you, too, but thank you very much.

[Commercial Announcer]

Very, very few advocates have that.

[Interviewer/Moderator]

I'll just stop, then.

[Melissa Murray]

Goal.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah, I didn't. Yeah, he seemed to really like. He really did that. But then there was another moment also in Blatt's argument that showed a different side of Justice Alito, and this was him taking, apparently, offense to something Justice Sotomayor had said about his previous colloquy with Blatt and Alito using that to kind of have what I read as a minor temper tantrum about how wronged he is by the current questioning format, which, you know, means that a lot of people get to go after him and he doesn't get to have the last word. So let's play that clip here.

[Melissa Murray]

Justice Alito. Well, let me begin with Justice Sotomayor's

[Commercial Announcer]

rebuttal of what she took me to be asking about regarding constitutional rights. Now, she will have the right to say rebuttal, which I won't have a chance to answer under this questioning regime that we have now.

[Melissa Murray]

Apparently, seniority doesn't have its purple chest.

[Leah Littman]

I love it. He is, as always, a messy bitch from New Jersey who leans into the drama.

[Kate Shaw]

He's so good. Like, I get to go too early in the order. It's so I don't get to. Then so do my. Ori just gets to say whatever she wants about me.

[Melissa Murray]

Okay, justice for New Jersey. Jesus.

[Leah Littman]

The last word. I get the last word. I mean, come on. This is like the Real Housewives series where they flip tables. I love Jersey. I love the Jersey Shore.

[Melissa Murray]

Oh, my God. Is he the Teresa Giudice of the court?

[Leah Littman]

You can hear him slapping the tables. You know, he's trying to flip the lectern.

[Kate Shaw]

I think it's bolted to the floor, so I probably won't work there.

[Leah Littman]

He'll probably have a grievance about that too.

[Melissa Murray]

He probably this is reminding me of that flight to I was going to a National Constitution center conference and Melissa and Joe Gorga on the flight. Also on the flight was Robbie George from Princeton and surprisingly they didn't know each other but I did.

[Leah Littman]

I knew both.

[Kate Shaw]

Well, I know Robbie George is but I have no idea who you can tame our but we will you be

[Melissa Murray]

in the Robbie George camp for this one? I don't think he knew he was

[Kate Shaw]

up there with the gorgeous the two of us share so much. Okay, so moving on, let's briefly cover the opinions we got from the court last week. First UP is Galette vs New Jersey Transit Corporation, in which the court unanimously held that the New Jersey Transit Corp. Is not an arm of the state for interstate sovereign immunity purposes. Sovereign immunity is protection from lawsuits, basically which states enjoy. The New Jersey Transit Corp. Was created by the State of New Jersey, but it's structured as a legally separate entity from the state and from the New Jersey Department of Transportation. And it has the traditional powers to sue and be sued and hold property and make contracts and incur debt. And all of that meant the court concluded that the Transit Corp. Was not an arm of the state or part of the state, which would entitle it to sovereign immunity. So that two individuals who had been struck by New Jersey Transit buses, one in New York, one in Pennsylvania, these were two separate cases that came up to the court together. But this finding meant that they could sue the Transit Corporation in their respective state courts for their injuries.

[Melissa Murray]

We also got an opinion in Uriah Orellana vs Bondi, where the court unanimously decided that when federal courts of appeals are reviewing a Board of Immigration Appeals determination that an asylum seeker didn't experience persecution based on a set of facts that are undisputed, the courts are to review the BIA's determination under what is known as the substantial evidence standard. That's a very deferential standard, which means that most asylum seekers will likely lose. But importantly, the court's opinion, which was written by Justice Jackson, did not extinguish the prospect of federal court review entirely. As she explained, the courts can set aside a BIA determination that an asylum seeker didn't experience past persecution or doesn't have a well founded fear of future persecution if the finding isn't supported by substantial evidence.

[Leah Littman]

So last beat on the Supreme Court, the latest NBC News poll suggests that the percentage of voters with, quote, significant levels of confidence in the Supreme Court has dropped to its lowest point since NBC began polling on the issue in the year 2000. So 22% of voters said they had a great deal or quite a bit of confidence. 40% had some 38% had very little or no confidence. Its working. People continue sending strict scrutiny to friends and family.

[Kate Shaw]

Challenge continues.

[Leah Littman]

So that's the legal news for the last week. And now you'll get to enjoy another part of the Bad Decisions Tour west coast version. And that's our interview with Representative Jimmy Gomez of California.

[Melissa Murray]

Well, hello there, Los Angeles. Thank you so much for being here. Representative Gomez, you are the perfect person to kick off this show because you are literally in the thick of things. You're here on the ground in la, which has been the site of a lot of, shall we say, unconstitutional things over the course of the last couple of months. And you also sit on numerous house committees in D.C. so you, sir, have all of the tea, and it's time to start spilling it.

[Kate Shaw]

So we're actually going to start by asking most of it. All right, well, spill what you can.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Yeah, the stuff I won't get arrested for, I will definitely spill.

[Melissa Murray]

Okay, you figure out where those boundaries.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah, yeah.

[Leah Littman]

This is a legal podcast, so.

[Melissa Murray]

Okay.

[Kate Shaw]

So. And actually that's a good segue to the first topic we wanted to ask you about, because you are part of ongoing litigation to ensure that Congress can exercise its oversight responsibilities, which are secured by statute, and they include visiting detention centers without advance notice. And, you know, that's actually an issue that's close to home for us. Your colleague, representative Lamonica McIver, who's a friend of the pod, is actually being criminally prosecuted for daring to engage in exactly the kind of oversight that the statute protects. So last week we had a development, which is that a district court blocked the administration's latest effort to obstruct members of Congress from accessing federal immigration facilities. Can you talk to us a bit about that litigation?

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Yeah, that came about when first a few. During the first Trump administration, we inserted language into an appropriations bill that said that no money could be used to block members of Congress from doing surprise inspections of any facility that held immigrants or undocumented or people that were accused of being in the country illegally. And we put that language in. We were being able to go and do spot inspections because if you don't, if you give them notice, they'll clean everything up. There won't be anybody there. So when we started doing this in, when the raid started here in June, the first thing I did the, the day after I got off the plane from D.C. i went to the detention center to do a spot inspection and they, they denied my ability to enter. And what we found out later is what they do very often is they lie. And when. And they said, shocked, shocked, shocked, and they, and they said. Said that I wasn't allowed in or other members of Congress because there was a thousand protesters outside. There was no one outside except attorneys and the press. So we saw this, so we got together and I was looking at suing myself for the fact that they're denying members of Congress access. And the thing was, they denied people from all over the country. We ended up getting 12 members to sue with Joe Negus, myself, Norma Torres. And we won the. It took months, but we won the first temporary injunction. What ended up happening, they allowed us to get in and then they said, well, it doesn't apply any longer because the one big beautiful bill, the $175 billion slush fund, didn't go through the normal appropriations process, therefore it doesn't apply. So then they even try to say it didn't apply to downtown LA, what they call B18, because that is a field office and not a detention center. So they were just making shit up every single step of the way. And then we finally had. We finally got to the point just last week where we won another injunction, temporary relief. And then that was. It only applied to the 13 members of Congress, but then they just expanded it to the entire 430, 35, so we can stop. And, And during the summer, one member said, oh, I'm going to get us appointment. Do you want to come? I said, they're just going to clean it up. So what we, we. They moved it back seven days, then they moved it back another seven days. So we finally got in after. After two weeks. That facility can hold up to 2, 244 individuals in nine different cells.

[Leah Littman]

So can we actually talk a little bit about what you've seen in the visits to the detention centers? Because, you know, last week we got news that another detainee, Emmanuel Demas, died in ICE custody because of an untreated tooth infection. And earlier today, the Associated Press and Mother Jones reported that staff at the largest ICE detention facility, Camp East Montana, are apparently taking bets on which detainee will be the next to die by suicide. So can you talk about what you saw in your conversations with people who have loved ones who have been detained or who themselves have been detained?

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Well, so that visit I was just mentioning, we show up, we finally get inside. No one was inside except two people. It can hold up to 240. And it smelled like they used bleach to clean every part of the. Of the detention facility. So that's why we have to do these spot inspections, because we know they're cleaning it up. We found out they diverted anybody that would normally go into that facility to Orange county, into Santa Ana. So what we're looking for, do they have proper medical treatment? Do they have. Is it overcrowded? Are they. Do they have access to attorneys? Do they. That have proper food? That's what we're looking for. And what we've learned, there's been more deaths in detention centers in 2025 than the past 10 years combined. So we look for people that were picked up and detained to see if they're not getting forced to sign what they call expedited removal orders. And one woman just recently, when I went back to see, she got arrested the day before. She was eight months back pregnant. Couldn't find her using this something called the A number. Next day, people were like, well, she called and told her, her boyfriend, her husband, she was arrested by ice. The next day we find out she was already in a different country. Like, never, never included. They never. And when I went and asked for her, they said she wasn't there. So they like, they. I think they're also hiding what they're doing with. With people.

[Melissa Murray]

Well, let's back up a few steps before we even get to the detentions. Like, there are all of these immigration stops have been happening here in Los Angeles. And I'd like to talk with you about a case that we've covered on the podcast Noem Vasquez Perdomo. And the case is named for Crispy Noem. More on her in a little bit. But again, it's about immigration stops here in Los Angeles. And a federal date district court issued an order that blocked ICE from making immigration stops that were based on the individual's apparent race, ethnicity, language spoken, as well as a number of other traits. But then the United States Supreme Court on the shadow docket, stayed the district court's order, which then freed ICE to do exactly the kind of racial profiling that the district court had said was impermissible.

[Kate Shaw]

And because this was the shadow docket, the court didn't explain itself, as is so often, often the case on the shadow docket. But Justice Kavanaugh did write separately to offer a pretty magical thinking account of what the immigration stops at issue really looked like. So on his telling, these stops are short. They are respectful, they end. I know, they end whenever the officers realize that an individual they are targeting is a citizen or is lawfully present. So. So that is the Kavanaugh account of what these stops looked like. And I have a feeling, Congressman, that that doesn't align with what you have heard from constituents about what folks are actually experiencing on the ground at the hands of ice. So can you talk about that?

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Yeah. What we've seen, right after these raids started, I pointed out that they were targeting people just based on their ethnicity, the jobs that they were doing, and if they had an accent or not. And this is. We see. We just see it. There's 500,000 people who are undocumented of European and Canadian descent. You think they're on the west side pulling people over? No. Right. They're not pulling. Like, they're not doing, like, sorry, you guys can beep it out right after.

[Kate Shaw]

Oh, no, we swear.

[Melissa Murray]

Gratuitous. We're keeping it in.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

But here's the thing. So I said that on case. Fox News made a big deal out of it. But you just see it over and over and over again. It is obvious what they were doing. I don't know. Ms. 13 gang members being day laborers at a Home Depot. Right. Or working on the back of a kitchen at some restaurant. So they are deliberately targeting people because if you look like me, you look like anybody of Latino descent, you're guilty. And that's what. What they basically allowed to be legal in this country.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah. And the district court found exactly as you're describing. And the Supreme Court just basically sashayed in and said like, no, we disagree. And then Kavanaugh had the kind of gumption to write separately.

[Melissa Murray]

Caucasity.

[Kate Shaw]

The caucasity. I guess that's what you call it.

[Leah Littman]

Mighty white of him.

[Kate Shaw]

Mighty white of him. To write separately, to essentially excuse it. And. And there was many, many things wrong with that separate concurrence. But one of the many was the sentence that I'm going to read right now in which he says the interest of individuals who are illegally in the country in avoiding being stopped by law enforcement is ultimately an interest in evading the law. That is not an especially weighty legal interest. So not only is there the obvious targeting of a subset of a potentially undocumented population based on things like race, ethnicity, language, spoken, job worked. It is also the case, even if there are obviously some undocumented individuals, there are many, many individuals who identify as Latino or Hispanic, millions in the Los Angeles area who are also subject to the targeting that Kavanaugh just blessed and that, I think has, like, set in motion much of what we have seen in the last year in Los Angeles and across the country.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

I think of my mom. My mom's been in this country for 40 plus years. Years. She became a citizen after Pete Wilson was threatening to take away people's, you know, benefits, Social Security, like he was going after undocumented and people who were Latino descent. And I was worried about her getting pulled over because she doesn't speak. Her English, is pretty broken up. She has an accent, so. And she wasn't. She doesn't carry her passport on her or an ID that like says, oh, I'm a US Citizen. So she could be arrested. And then when she was in Mexico for a number of months, we thought about sending one of us down there to escort her back because she would be targeted just because of who she is. And that's a reality. And that's what people live in fear in every single day in Los Angeles and across the country. Kids all of a sudden are not going to school. All of a sudden, people who are diagnosed with certain diseases are not going to get those treatments. Somebody told me that one of their patients needed to get dialysis and stop showing up. You have to have functioning kidneys to be able to live. But that is happening every single day because of the fear that this administration has caused through every single neighborhood that I represent.

[Kate Shaw]

Not just the administration, but that the Supreme Court has permitted. Brett Kavanaugh owns kind of everything that you just listed. Yeah, yeah.

[Melissa Murray]

Strict scrutiny is brought to you by dose. We're all trying to feel healthy, right? We're drinking more water, we're getting our steps in, we're taking our vitamins. But here's what most people miss. Your liver health. The liver literally affects, affects everything. Your energy, digestion, how your skin looks, even your metabolism. It's time to show your liver a little love. And this is where dose comes in. Dose for your liver is a clinically backed liver health supplement. This isn't just another capsule or powder. Dose is a liquid supplement. It's taken in a daily 2 ounce shot and it tastes like fresh squeezed orange juice. That's right. Zero sugar, zero junk, zero calories. Dose cleanses the liver of the unwanted stressors that are slowing your liver down, clearing the way for your liver to do its job. Now, you might be wondering, what exactly is my liver's job? Guess what. The liver is your body's filter. It processes everything you Consume and performs 500 plus daily functions that affect energy production, digestion, fat metabolism, and vitamin storage. With Dose, you're going to feel less sluggish, so no more midday crashes and you'll support your metabolism and daily digestion. And we're talking about real results. Two double blind placebo controlled studies showed Dose's positive impact on liver enzyme levels. So if you're ready to give your liver the love and support it deserves, head over to dosedaily co strict or enter strict to get 35% off your first subscription. Your body does so much for you. Do something for your body that's D O S E D A I l y dot c strict for 35% off your first month subscription at Dose. Strict scrutiny is brought to you by Babbel why do most of us want to learn a new language? It's probably not because we love memorizing grammar tables or we want to talk some leaderboard somewhere. It's because we want to speak it. We want to get out there in the real world with real people and start communicating. And guess what? Babbel gets you there and it gets you there fast. Learning a language with Babbel is all about small steps, big wins and progress. You can actually track and feel their bite sized lessons fit easily into your daily routine. You can do just 10 minutes a day and it's enough to start seeing real results. Their courses are designed by over 200 language experts who are real human beings who teach you the relevant words and phrases that you will actually use. You'll build the confidence to speak up when it matters, from ordering coffee to chatting with new friends abroad. And Babbel also offers a large collection of podcasts where Babel experts reveal language secrets and offer an inside look at local cultures. I'm telling you, I love Babbel because because it's great when you're going on a trip and you want to just get up to speed on the basic phrases that you'll need so you can communicate with people in this new country in a way that is respectful and honors their culture, their community and your decision to try and be a part of it. Even if it's only for a short amount of time. Babbel adapts to your learning style and keeps you motivated with personalized plans, real time feedback and progress tracking. So make fast lasting progress with Babbel, the science backed language learning app that actually works. Babbel has over 25 million subscriptions sold worldwide and it has 14 languages that you can choose from. Something for every vibe. Every course also comes with a 14 day money back guarantee. And guess what stricties here is a special limited time deal just for you. Right now you can get 60% off your Babel subscription at babbel.com strip. Get up to 60% [e-mail] that's spelled B-A B B E L.com strict rules and restrictions may apply.

[Commercial Announcer]

If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H Vac and plumbing supplies to lighting and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done. If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H Vac and plumbing supplies to lighting and and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done.

[Leah Littman]

So let's shift gears a little bit. You are on the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. We are obviously living through a wildly irresponsible, reckless, catastrophic attack, slash, strike, slash regime change against Iran. And as ever, it feels like there's a disconnect between what Trump and those surrounding him are saying and what reality actually is. You know, on one hand, nuclear facilities were destroyed last summer. On the other hand, they were on the cusp of a nuclear weapon. So how does all of the noise surround what the administration is doing speak to the wisdom and sanity, or lack thereof, of what the administration is doing vis a vis Iran?

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

This administration has no respect for the law, for Congress, for facts. And what they will do is they'll try to develop a fact pattern to justify any course of action. So when it came to investigating these facilities, oh, too many people protest. Oh, it's not. It's not a detention center. It doesn't apply. So they just developed these facts when it comes to Iran, same thing. They are lying. I have not heard anything that supports their views. And even if you look at the public record, it's all there. Tulsi Gabbard. Who? She's crazy as they come and should never be trusted. But she spoke in front of Congress and said that Iran last spring. She said Iran was not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon. Trump on the plane, a reporter asks him and he goes, tulsi doesn't know what she's talking about. Then they.

[Leah Littman]

That's why I made her Director of National Intelligence. Right? Yeah, Great. Great role for someone who doesn't know what she's talking about.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Exactly. And then they do Operation Midnight Hammer when they. They drop the bomb on Fredo. Then he said, oh, it was beautiful. It was great. It was. All of a sudden, we obliterated their program. And there was public reporting that it only set back that program by a few months. And that person got fired. Right. They asked them to actually go back and look at that and intelligence again. And then the person came back with the same intelligence and got fired. And then other people got fired because they were going against the public. The narrative that Trump put out. So same thing is happening now. How many different rationale has he given? One, it was to help the protesters. Two, to stop the missile program. But that doesn't. The Department of Defense says that's not going to be operational to actually get a missile to the United States until 2035. Three, a nuclear program that was supposed to be obliterated last summer. They're only weeks away. But all intelligence says that they've actually. They're not actively pursuing. Right. That is in the public sphere, that intelligence. And Trump is just using it as an excuse. Then you have. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, well, we were. We had an attack because if Israel attacked Iran, then Iran might attack our facilities. So they're trying to find a legal rationale to support their actions, but their actions are.

[Melissa Murray]

This sounds like originalism, huh? This sounds like originalism, exactly.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

They're strict Constitution Constitutionalists or constructionists. No, they're like everything they're doing, they engaged in a war of choice, and they're trying to disguise it as a war of necessity. And when all the facts come out, the people who either voted no on the War Powers Resolution or are, like, justifying these actions, it's going to come back to bite them in the ass. And I hope that we hold them accountable for lying to the American public.

[Melissa Murray]

So, Representative Gomez, you've mentioned so far, Marco Rubio, Tulsi Gabbard, President Trump, we've mentioned Brett Kavanaugh. All of these are guaranteed buzz kills. So let's shift the vibes a little bit. You are like Brett Kavanaugh, a father. In fact, you are the founder of the Congressional Dads Caucus. So what is the Congressional Dads Caucus doing right now to Help all of us raise the nation's children and make this a safer, more productive environment for them.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Well, the Congressional Dads Caucus, we're up to 50 members now. They're only Democrats, Democrats and Republicans.

[Melissa Murray]

So weird.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Yeah. So. And what we're doing. Doing, we're trying to put forward an agenda that works for working families. And what does that. And also lead the Democratic caucus in a direction that kind of boxes the caucus in. So when we take the majority, that these issues remain at the top of the legislative agenda. So on March 17, we're hosting the first ever national summit on. On the caregiving crisis. And we're doing that in order to highlight the needs of people that are taking care of newborn babies and kids, but also the sandwich generation that's also taking care of their elderly parents and how there's not enough support. And what does it do to the family? What does it do to our economy? An average family pays 26% of of their income towards childcare. And then you add in housing, that's another 30%. And we had a national summit on the housing affordability crisis in September. So what we're doing is we're trying to build this support and box people in and then at the same time, getting dads that are members of Congress to say, dads have a responsibility to take care of our kids, not only at home, but also in the halls of Congress.

[Melissa Murray]

Yes, yes, all of those things.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah, it is. I think, in terms of a hopeful note, to end on kind of recasting caregiving as an issue that dads need to have some ownership in is so important. So thank you for that work and for leaving us with a bright spot of hope, especially the kind of embedded premise that is that when the Democrats take the majority, we want to have the agenda ready to go on day one. And it sounds like you are hard at work at that. So thank you so much.

[Representative Jimmy Gomez]

Thank you.

[Kate Shaw]

All right, Representative Gomez, it was great to have you. Thank you so much for being with us. That was a fun conversation, and it reminds me of something to share before we get to our favorite things. So people are probably aware of this, but I'll remind you in case you're not, we are less than nine months away from the midterms, and there is a lot of work that you can do right now. November will decide control of Congress. And also tell us whether Trump is going to maintain his Republican trifecta. And our friends at Vote Save America are here to help if you are eager to get started doing your part. Now, they will give you which you should be. They will give you tips on how and when and where to donate to make sure your money goes the furthest. How to confidently talk to people in your life about midterms and key issues and opportunities to take action with your community in real life.

[Leah Littman]

I am already hosting a fundraiser for a state race this upcoming weekend. So yes, people need to start doing things now.

[Kate Shaw]

Yeah, it's like nine months is not that long.

[Melissa Murray]

Go time bitches is yeah it is.

[Kate Shaw]

Okay, so go to votesave America.com you can sign up to be part of the work this year and then send the sign up link to five friends. This is paid for by Vote Save America. Learn more@votesave America.com this ad has not been authorized by any candidate or candidates committee.

[Melissa Murray]

Now on to our favorite things which is authorized by a candidate in the candidates committee, namely the President in Florsheim shoes. J.K. just kidding.

[Leah Littman]

No, not at all. One of my favorite things is people doing work for the midterms starting now and signing up for votesafeamerica.com Also, as I mentioned earlier, Kacey Musgraves has a new single, Dry Spell, a new album that will come out in May. I'm obsessed with the single. It calls to mind like earlier work in Golden Hour and it's just great. Very catchy. Judge Young, a Reagan appointee, had a fantastic district Court opinion on a stay issue denying a stay of the remedies he had ordered in response to the federal government's illegal targeting of students and noncitizens based on pro Palestinian speech and the opinion wrote, quote quote now that it suits their interests. It is ironic to hear the public officials wail that they are but bit players in a fractured government, claiming that the U.S. customs and Immigration Service is somehow not before the court and unrepresented here as this court recognizes. The entire theory of this administration is that of a unitary executive with no agency independence, where every single employee within the Article 2 executive dances to the tune of the President. End quote Receipts. Exactly. Love it. Favorite thing there's also a forthcoming law review article I recently read and really enjoyed. It is by Genevieve Lakier and Sonya Starr, forthcoming in the Texas Law Review called the War on DEI as a project of Constitutional subversion, so would definitely recommend that as well.

[Kate Shaw]

Awesome. I wonder. Melissa, we should I guess it's too late to add any citations, but it sounds like there might be some kind of connections between we were sort of arguing that at least the gender related executive orders are part of this kind of constitutional reimagining that the administration is pursuing. So that's what we argue in this forthcoming Supreme Court review piece. So I'll have to check that one out. I am going to totally shift gears and recommend a little bit of fiction. So I just read the Correspondent, which my book club discussed and I actually liked it kind of a lot, but it was extremely divisive in my book club and that actually makes for a good book club book because we really debated it and so recommend it if you're looking for a book club book. I also just started the Hail Mary project which my 11 year old read and or actually he and my husband listened to like back and forth to travel basketball like over many weekends and I thought it was ya, but it's more kind of sci fi. I don't know if it's technically ya, but it's incredibly fun and there is a big movie based on the book coming out later this month with Ryan Gosling who plays this, well, the scientist middle school teacher, the kind of protagonist. Anyway, it's incredibly riveting. Finally, I think I've previously recommended the novel Vladimir, which I loved and is now a Netflix show that I started watching and have been enjoying. But if you haven't read the book, really read the book maybe before you watch the series and then do that too. That's it.

[Melissa Murray]

I also wanted to plus one Vladimir. Kate has been literally pouring this book into my ear for months, but I still haven't read it. So I just decided instead to watch it on Netflix because it stars some people I really like. Rachel Weisz for example, Leo Woodall. Really, really cute. And also my personal favorite, the Silver Fox, John Slattery. So it's really fun. It has a lot of like break the fourth wall moments that are really funny. So highly recommend that. Also wanted to recommend the documentary that's now out from HBO and Soledad o', Brien, the Devil Is Busy, which is all about the post roe landscape. Really fantastic out in the Bay Area. I should have mentioned this then, but I actually didn't start reading the book until on the way back from the Bay Area, so. So this is Savala Nolan's good A Reckoning, which is a fantastic collection of feminist essays. And if you're not familiar with Savala Nolan's writing, you should be. Her debut collection, Don't Let it get yout Essays on Race, Gender and the Body, was an absolute tour de force and this new collection is I think even better. So very, very highly recommend. I'm also watching Ryan Murphy's love story like everyone else about JFK Jr. And Carolyn Biss. And although I am thoroughly enjoying it, the thing I really want to recommend or like wish for bring into existence is a soundtrack from this because the music is absolutely fantastic. It is a time capsule of all of the great hits from the 1990s. Intern Jordan would be absolutely obsessed. The music is so on point. The Cranberries better than Ezra James. Absolutely amazing. And of course the clothes are nostalgia inducing and amazing too. I'm also really excited to report that there have been more Stricties in the Wild. Saw a couple of you at the airport in Los Angeles. Great to see you and had the good fortune to be seated next to Stricty Justine at a dinner last week. She enjoys the podcast and I enjoyed chatting to her and we were still basking in the glow of our warm west coast welcome. So thanks to everyone who made that choice. Such a resounding success.

[Leah Littman]

That reminds me, I also met a Strictie in the Wild, Hillary at the University of Michigan who is a student here and on the West Coast Glow. I am wearing a shirt that was given to us by one of our west coast listeners that features the Portland Frog and says Ribbit, resist, repeat and no hope without hop. And I love it.

[Kate Shaw]

And it's sort of a Shepherd Fairy esque rendition of the Toad for those of you not watching on YouTube.

[Leah Littman]

Portland Frog, not Toad.

[Kate Shaw]

Forgive me, sorry, sorry Kate. I also just read Tuck everlasting with my 8 year old and there's a toad who appears in sort of a couple pivotal moments. I think that's why Toad was front of mine. Also, I'm not sure I could totally tell that that was a frog and not a toad, but I guess he is the Portland Frog.

[Melissa Murray]

Totally.

[Kate Shaw]

Strict Scrutiny is a crooked media production hosted and executive produced by Leah Lippman, Melissa Murray and me, Kate Shaw. Our Senior Producer and editor is Melody Rowell. Michael Goldsmith is our producer. Jordan Thomas is our intern. Music by Eddie Cooper Production support from Katie Long and Adrienne Hill. Matt de Groat is our Head of production. Thanks to our video team, Ben Hethcote and Johanna Case, our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East. If you haven't already, be sure to subscribe to Strict Scrutiny in your favorite podcast app and on YouTube. Strict Scrutiny Podcast so you never miss an episode. And if you want to help other people find the show, please rate and review us. It really helps.

[Commercial Announcer]

If you work in university maintenance. Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off and Grainger is your trusted partner offering the products you need all in one place from H VAC and plumbing supplies to lighting and more and all delivered with plenty. Plenty of time left on the clock so your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done. If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off and Grainger is your trusted partner offering the products you need all in one place from H VAC and plumbing supplies to lighting and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock so your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done.

[Kate Shaw]

When you manage procurement for multiple facilities, every order matters.

[Melissa Murray]

But when it's for a hospital system,

[Kate Shaw]

they matter even more. Grainger gets it and knows there's no time for managing multiple suppliers and and no room for shipping delays. That's why Grainger offers millions of products

[Melissa Murray]

in fast, dependable delivery so you can keep your facility stocked, safe and running smoothly. Call 1-800-GRAINGER click granger.com or just stop

[Kate Shaw]

by Granger for the ones who get it done.