Stuff You Should Know: How Boycotts Work (Or Do They?)
Hosted by Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant | Released on July 22, 2025

Introduction: The Modern Dilemma of Boycotts

In this illuminating episode, hosts Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant delve into the intricate world of boycotts, questioning their effectiveness and exploring their evolution in the digital age. They express concern over the frequency and impulsiveness of modern boycotts, largely driven by social media trends.

Josh Clark [03:10]: "If you really followed every boycott like you would starve to death. There'd be nowhere you could buy food any longer, let alone anything else."

The Origins of Boycotts: Charles Boycott and County Mayo

The term "boycott" finds its roots in the actions against Charles Boycott, an English land agent in County Mayo, Ireland, in 1879. Facing relentless harassment from the tenant farmers organized by the Land League, Boycott's refusal to evict tenants led to a collective effort to ruin his livelihood, giving birth to the term.

Chuck Bryant [04:36]: "He was an Englishman living in Ireland and County Mayo, and he was a rent collector... the Irish people decided to do something about it."

Historical Successes: American Colonial and Civil Rights Movements

Boycott strategies have historically been pivotal in significant social and political movements:

• American Colonial Boycotts: In response to the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Revenue Act of 1767, American colonists organized non-importation agreements, leading to the eventual repeal of these oppressive taxes.

  Chuck Bryant [16:38]: "The first boycott we're going to talk about is 1765. The Stamp Act... Parliament repealed the Stamp Act about a year later."

• Montgomery Bus Boycott: One of the most iconic boycotts in history, lasting 382 days, it successfully challenged and dismantled bus segregation laws, culminating in a Supreme Court ruling.

  Josh Clark [21:40]: "If your boycott leads to a Supreme Court ruling that what you're fighting against is unconstitutional, that is a successful boycott."

• United Farm Workers and Cesar Chavez: The grape boycott raised awareness and improved working conditions for grape harvesters through strategic public education and widespread support.

International Boycotts: The Fight Against Apartheid

The global struggle against South African apartheid showcases the power of sustained international boycotts:

• Sports and Cultural Boycotts: Organizations like the International Table Tennis Federation and the International Olympic Committee banned South African teams, isolating the nation economically and culturally.

  Chuck Bryant [24:36]: "The IOC committee said, no South African teams can participate in the Olympics. And that was a ban that lasted from '64 to '92."

• Music and Celebrity Influence: The "Artists United Against Apartheid" movement, spearheaded by Stevie Van Zant and others, used music to amplify the boycott's message, raising both funds and awareness.

  Chuck Bryant [27:20]: "They ended up raising like a million bucks, so not a lot of money. But awareness was probably one of the biggest things."

Modern Boycotts in the Social Media Era: Successes and Failures

Josh and Chuck explore how social media has transformed boycotts, making them more immediate but sometimes less effective:

• Goya Boycott: Initiated by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's support for then-President Trump, the boycott backfired as it triggered a counter-boycott, resulting in a temporary 22% sales bump for Goya. However, this surge was unsustainable, and sales eventually normalized.

  Chuck Bryant [38:07]: "Goya got a 22% bump in sales because of that Buycott. But it did not last long because... they were already buying them."

• Nike and Colin Kaepernick: Nike's support for Kaepernick led to a significant increase in sales, demonstrating that taking a stand can rally support and boost a brand when aligned with consumer values.

  Josh Clark [40:00]: "There was a huge backlash... but it spurred a boycott to support Nike, and Nike made out like bandits with an additional $6 billion in sales."

• Bud Light and Dylan Mulvaney: A controversial marketing campaign featuring transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney resulted in a steep 32% drop in sales over eight months, highlighting the risks of polarizing stances.

  Chuck Bryant [42:03]: "Bud Light sales went down 28% compared to the same period in prior years... ultimately, they were down 32% overall in sales."

Analysis: The Anatomy of an Effective Boycott

The hosts outline critical factors that determine a boycott's success:

1. Clear Goals and Narrow Targets: Successful boycotts focus on specific issues or entities to maximize impact.
2. Awareness and Education: Spreading knowledge about the boycott's purpose galvanizes public support.
3. Reaching Core Customers: Targeting the entity's primary consumer base ensures financial pressure.
4. Substitutability: Offering easy alternatives allows participants to switch without inconvenience.
5. Financial Impact: Ensuring the boycott affects the company's revenue is crucial.
6. Observability: Visible participation enhances the movement's legitimacy and pressure.

Josh Clark [49:43]: "Egregiousness, efficacy, self-enhancement, and estimated participation of others are key motivators for boycott participation."

Conclusion: The Dual-Edged Sword of Modern Boycotts

While boycotts remain a powerful tool for social and political change, their effectiveness in the digital age is mixed. Social media's rapid dissemination can both amplify and dilute boycott efforts, sometimes leading to fleeting trends rather than sustained action. Additionally, the emergence of counter-boycotts can undermine original intents, as seen with Goya and Nike.

Advice to Companies:

• Authenticity: Companies should take genuine stances aligned with their core values rather than opportunistic or reactive measures.
• Consistency: Maintaining consistent positions avoids alienating parts of their customer base.
• Transparency: Clear communication about values and actions fosters trust and support.

Advice to Individuals:

• Focus and Commitment: Effective boycotts require sustained effort and dedication beyond initial social media engagement.
• Informed Participation: Understanding the broader impact and strategies of boycotts ensures meaningful contributions to change.

Josh Clark [47:54]: "Do you want to take a break and come back and talk about whether social media boycotts are effective?"

Notable Quotes

• Josh Clark [03:10]: "If you really followed every boycott like you would starve to death. There'd be nowhere you could buy food any longer, let alone anything else."
• Chuck Bryant [04:36]: "He was an Englishman living in Ireland and County Mayo, and he was a rent collector... the Irish people decided to do something about it."
• Chuck Bryant [38:07]: "Goya got a 22% bump in sales because of that Buycott. But it did not last long because... they were already buying them."
• Josh Clark [40:00]: "There was a huge backlash... but it spurred a boycott to support Nike, and Nike made out like bandits with an additional $6 billion in sales."

Final Thoughts

Josh and Chuck provide a comprehensive exploration of boycotts, blending historical context with contemporary examples to assess their efficacy. They emphasize the importance of strategic planning, sustained effort, and understanding the dynamics of modern consumer behavior to harness the true power of boycotts as instruments of change.

Thank you for listening to "Stuff You Should Know." For more insightful episodes, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or your preferred podcast platform.