Loading summary
Chuck Bryant
This is an I heart podcast.
Josh Clark
Host Nora McInerney returns for season three of the Head Start, Embracing the Journey, a podcast from Ruby Studio and AbbVie. Each episode, Nora shares intimate conversations with real people living with chronic migraine as they try to find the doctor that is right for them, navigate their treatment journey and be present in the moment in spite of it all. Join in the conversation for season three and create more space for empathy and understanding for this invisible chronic disease. Listen to the Head Start Embracing the journey on the iHeartRadio app or where wherever you get your podcasts.
Chuck Bryant
Hey, and welcome to the Short Stuff. Josh, Chuck, Jerry. Not Dave, but Dave. And this is Short Stuff.
Josh Clark
Yeah. The one in which we continue to lay wood onto Sigmund Freud.
Chuck Bryant
What?
Josh Clark
As a lot of people do.
Chuck Bryant
Yeah. I mean, his spirit, at least.
Josh Clark
Yeah, yeah. I mean, here's the deal with Sigmund Freud and I think this thing that you put together from Britannica and very well, mind and psych central and simply psychology in other places, I think it kind of nails it where like, maybe we should just think of Freud as kind of an innovative, perhaps even great mind and thinker and not like a rigorous scientist. Because a lot of the stuff in his psychoanalysis and his theories was not. It was just stuff based on anecdotal things he saw in the cases he worked on. Sometimes just like a single case would make him say, like, oh, well, here's what this is, I think.
Chuck Bryant
Yeah, yeah. I mean, he would just theorize based on conjecture. He never applied the scientific method to any of his theories. He just thought and talked out loud and smoked cigars and he came up with interesting explanations. Right. For. For things he observed, for like actual real things. And one of the actual real things that he observed is that a lot of times little kids are mean and hostile to one parent and can't be separated from the other parent. And he came to kind of recognize that usually they were attached to the opposite sex parent and were mean to the same sex parent. And that formed the basis of what came to be known as the Oedipus complex, which is far and away his most famous theory among a lot of very famous theories that he came up with. But just like all the other ones, it's essentially conjecture.
Josh Clark
Yeah. I mean, when you think if you know nothing about Freud, you probably have made a joke about like somebody wanting to sleep with their mother.
Chuck Bryant
Yeah. I mean, there's a penis envy.
Josh Clark
Yeah. What is it?
Chuck Bryant
I'm not going to tell you.
Josh Clark
So we should just quickly go over the Greek myth of Oedipus, in which it was so named for Oedipus was abandoned at birth and then fulfilled a prophecy, killing his father, the king, and marrying his mother, the queen, whom he did not know because he was abandoned at birth. That was his father and his mother. He ended up having four kids with his mother. And after learning this, Queen Jocasta hanged herself and Oedipus gouged out his eyes, perhaps appropriate action.
Chuck Bryant
Yeah.
Josh Clark
In his case at least.
Chuck Bryant
Yeah. So grossed out, he gouged out his own eyes. And to be clear to the Greeks, the point of this myth was not like, how gross is this? It was like, it was about how, like the inevitability of fate and the inability of humans to like, change their fate or their destiny because he was. This was a prophecy that he ended up fulfilling despite trying really hard not to. Right. Freud was like, I like that really gross part. I'm going to use that to describe these feelings that little kids have toward their parents.
Josh Clark
I like the idea though that someone's writing this myth and they're like, oh, boys, I got one for you. This one's so gnarly.
Chuck Bryant
Gnarly.
Josh Clark
What's it about? Oh, you just wait.
Chuck Bryant
Yeah, I'm not going to do.
Josh Clark
It's about destiny, whatever. Sure, sure.
Chuck Bryant
So, yeah, I mean, that's where Freud picked it up. Was. I mean, it is perfectly suited in that sense.
Josh Clark
Yeah. And we'll describe kind of directly from the Simply Psychology website what the Oedipal complex is. And it occurs during the phallic stage of development, ages 3 to 6, in which the source of libido or the life force is concentrated in the erogenous zones of the child's body. And during this stage children experience an unconscious feeling of desire for their opposite sex parent and, and jealousy and envy toward their same sex parent.
Chuck Bryant
Okay, it makes sense. It's a little, it's a little jargony. I also found one from Encyclopedia Britannica. It's a little more layperson geared. They say the Oedipus complex and psychoanalytic theory is a desire for sexual involvement with the parent of the opposite sex and a concomitant sense of rivalry with the parent of the same sex. But it's a crucial stage in the normal development process according to psychoanalytic theory at least.
Josh Clark
Yeah, that part is pretty key. And what's also key is that Freud based this on a case, one case study of a four year old patient that he anonymized as little Hans. Apparently little Hans was brought in by his father and had recently seen the collapse of a horse pulling a heavy cart. That really traumatized him.
Chuck Bryant
Would traumatize anybody.
Josh Clark
Sure. And he developed a fear of horses.
Chuck Bryant
Sure.
Josh Clark
So Hans father said, you know what? He's developed all these really specific anxieties. He feels really uneasy without mom around and he's really fixated on male genitalia, especially horse genitalia.
Chuck Bryant
And Freud was like, yes, yes, I see. Very interesting. Yeah, I'm sorry, everybody. So he basically said, this all just makes total sense. Check this out. Hans father, all of this comes from a foundational animosity that he has towards you, his dad. And the reason that he's afraid of horses, because the horses represent you, his dad. And he's afraid that you, his dad, are going to castrate him because he secretly wants to sleep with his mother. He, Even though he's 4 years old and Freud's sycophantic secretary, jumped to his feet and started applauding uncomfortably loudly.
Josh Clark
Yeah, which this, you know, if you went into a, you know, a shrink today and you heard something like this, you'd say, thank you for your time, I'll be going to see someone else.
Chuck Bryant
You could actually probably file suit for something like that.
Josh Clark
Yeah, you probably could. But at the time, this turned out to be like the foundational legacy of Freud's psychoanalysis, which is just, you know, bananas to think about.
Chuck Bryant
Should we talk about girls first and take a break or a break and then girls.
Josh Clark
Let's talk about girls.
Chuck Bryant
Okay. Because there are such things as girls. And Freud was like, well, I guess I should probably talk about the girls too. He didn't come up with the name Electra complex, that was Carl Jung. But he did take the Oedipal complex and apply it to girls and basically said, same thing, but do the old switcheroo with the parents. The girls want to sleep with their father and, and they hate their mother. But the whole thing is not to do with castration anxiety. It's penis envy in girls.
Josh Clark
That's right. And what I mentioned is the first key. And by the way, I realized how creepy that sounded when I said, let's talk about girls.
Chuck Bryant
Okay, I take it that way.
Josh Clark
Okay, good. His proposal was, and this is very key, was that a kid that does not undergo this experience of the Oedipal complex will not fully mature sexually and they will be stuck for life. They're going to be stuck identifying with the opposite sex parent and they will never be able to have a normal, socially acceptable love life. And desires for people who aren't in their family.
Chuck Bryant
Yeah. He basically said that an incomplete development through the Oedipal complex is the basis of homosexuality. That's how he would have put it at the time. And then the other problem of it is you're stuck in that portion of your development, doomed to forever like go through it, even though you're never going to get past it. And he said that guys like that turn out to be real Norman Bates types. And all of his colleagues were like, who is Norman Bates? And Freud was like, just wait, just wait because he's going to knock your socks off when he comes along. In the early 60s.
Josh Clark
I guess we take our break now.
Chuck Bryant
Yes.
Josh Clark
All right, we'll be back right after this.
Nora McInerney
This July 4th, celebrate freedom from spills, stains and overpriced furniture with Annabe, the only machine washable sofa inside and out where designer qual meets budget friendly pricing. Sofas start at just $699, making it the perfect time to upgrade your space. Annabe's pet friendly stain resistant and interchangeable slip covers are made with high performance fabric that's built for real life. You'll love the cloud like comfort of hypoallergenic high resilience foam that never needs fluffing and a durable steel frame that stands the test of time with modular pieces you can rearrange anytime. It's a simple sofa that adapts to your Life. Now through July 4th, get up to 60% off site wide@washablesofas.com Every order comes with a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping, no restocking fees. Every penny back. Declare independence from dirty outdated furniture. Shop now@washablesofas.com Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.
Announcer
Did you know using your browser in incognito mode doesn't actually protect your privacy? Take back your privacy with ipvan. Just one tap and all your data, passwords, communications, browsing history and more will be instantly protected. Ipvanish makes you virtually Invisible Online. Use IPVanish on all your devices, anytime you go online at home, and especially on public wi fi. Get IPVanish now for 70% off a yearly plan with this exclusive offer@ipvanish.com audio.
Chuck Bryant
Now. Okay, Chuck, so we're back. So the big question is, is all of this weird gross stuff correct? Answer me.
Josh Clark
Well, most psychologists today and the world of psychology as a whole are pretty like bashful about even talking about this. They're like, can we just kind of forget all that stuff? We've moved on. It's completely discredited. Most of Freud's theories are pretty discredited at this point. But that's not to say that there isn't some support for this still.
Chuck Bryant
No. There have been papers that have come out that seem to very strongly support the presence of Freud's Oedipus complex. And one came out in 2009. It was published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society. Baby. Um, and it made international news when it was published because they studied the similarities, the physical characteristic similarities between men's mothers and their wives. And they measured everything as, like, jaw length. They did everything. And they. They were coming up with correlations in, like, the 92nd percentile. So essentially, like photocopies between mom and wife. And they were like, see, guys really want their moms. What you gonna do, dog's gonna hunt kind of thing. And like I said, it made international news. And luckily some other scientists were like, let me see your data, and went through, and they're like, this does not support your conclusions at all.
Josh Clark
Yeah, here's the thing. I'm gonna go out on a limb. Hold onto your hats. I'm gonna go on a limb and say, I've seen plenty of examples where kids end up married to someone that is maybe in some way, like a really good parent that they had of the opposite sex or maybe of the same sex even. I don't necessarily think it's the looks thing, but if you're a really awesome dad and you're super fun and funny and maybe you have a certain job and your daughter goes on to marry somebody who's got, like, a great sense of humor and has maybe have a similar interest as something your father did. Like, I think that can be a thing. I don't think it's always a thing, but it's just sort of when you're raised with a parent that you look up to and love and admire, you may seek out people like that in your life. And I think that's kind of all that is.
Chuck Bryant
I think similarly, and maybe even more frequently or commonly, people inadvertently or unconsciously seek out people who are like their parents in the worst ways.
Josh Clark
Yeah. Or sometimes completely seek out the opposite.
Chuck Bryant
Yes, but that's more conscious.
Josh Clark
Yeah, maybe so, but. Yeah, I see what you mean for sure.
Chuck Bryant
Yeah. So again, there have been. There was another paper in the 80s that studied rats that basically said, like, yes, these rats at least have oedipus complexes that carry on. So luckily, psychology came up with some other stuff that says, like, okay, kids do stuff like this when they're young, but we don't think it's the Oedipus complex. And luckily, things like attachment theory, which we did an entire episode on, that was pretty good.
Josh Clark
Yeah.
Chuck Bryant
Have come along.
Josh Clark
Way less creepy.
Chuck Bryant
Way less creepy. They've come along and offered pretty good structures for understanding child development that is just much less icky than Freud's.
Josh Clark
So you're just gonna summarize that rat study? You're not gonna talk about rat ejaculation?
Chuck Bryant
Do you want me to?
Josh Clark
No, I think we should just leave that right there.
Chuck Bryant
Okay, cool. So I think more than ever, short stuff is out.
Josh Clark
Stuff youf Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts, my heart radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever.
Nora McInerney
You listen to your favor.
Podcast Summary: "Short Stuff: Oedipus Complex" – Stuff You Should Know
Episode Release Date: June 25, 2025
Hosts: Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark
Produced by: iHeartPodcasts
In the "Short Stuff" segment of the Stuff You Should Know podcast, hosts Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark delve into the intriguing and often controversial concept of the Oedipus Complex. This episode provides listeners with an engaging exploration of Sigmund Freud's most renowned, yet debated, psychological theory, examining its historical context, foundational premises, criticisms, and enduring legacy.
The episode opens with Chuck and Josh setting the stage for their discussion on Sigmund Freud, a towering yet polarizing figure in psychology. Chuck remarks on Freud’s legacy, stating:
“He came up with interesting explanations... [but] it's essentially conjecture.”
(00:56)
Josh concurs, highlighting Freud's reliance on anecdotal evidence rather than rigorous scientific methodology:
“He never applied the scientific method to any of his theories... based on conjecture.”
(01:35)
This sets the tone for a critical examination of Freud's approach to psychoanalysis, particularly focusing on the Oedipus Complex.
To contextualize Freud's theory, Josh briefly narrates the Greek myth of Oedipus, emphasizing its themes of destiny and unintended fulfillment of prophecy:
“Oedipus was abandoned at birth... fulfilled a prophecy, killing his father, the king, and marrying his mother, the queen...”
(02:36)
Chuck adds depth by reflecting on the myth's original intent, noting:
“The point of this myth was... the inevitability of fate... despite trying really hard not to.”
(03:17)
This recounting underscores the foundational elements of fate and parental relationships that Freud would later incorporate into his psychological theories.
Josh transitions to Freud's adaptation of the myth, explaining the Oedipus Complex within psychoanalytic theory:
“It occurs during the phallic stage of development, ages 3 to 6... an unconscious feeling of desire for their opposite sex parent and jealousy and envy toward their same sex parent.”
(04:04)
Chuck echoes this definition with a more layperson-friendly explanation from Encyclopedia Britannica:
“A desire for sexual involvement with the parent of the opposite sex and a concomitant sense of rivalry with the parent of the same sex... a crucial stage in the normal development process.”
(04:37)
This segment clarifies the core components of the Oedipus Complex, emphasizing its perceived role in normal psychological development.
The hosts discuss Freud's famous case study of Little Hans to illustrate the Oedipus Complex in practice:
Josh outlines the case:
“Hans father said... he's fixated on male genitalia, especially horse genitalia.”
(05:05)
Chuck dramatizes Freud's interpretation:
“Sigmund Freud was like... Hans' animosity towards his dad... afraid of castration... wants to sleep with his mother.”
(06:30)
This illustration serves to demonstrate how Freud applied his theories to clinical observations, albeit controversially and subjectively.
Transitioning to gender differences, Chuck introduces the concept of the Electra Complex, coined by Carl Jung, as Freud's counterpart for female development:
“He did not come up with the name Electra Complex, that was Carl Jung... girls want to sleep with their father and hate their mother.”
(06:53)
Josh adds further detail:
“A kid that does not undergo this experience... will not fully mature sexually... stuck identifying with the opposite sex parent.”
(07:37)
This discussion highlights Freud's extension of his theories to encompass both male and female psychosexual development, despite originating from different mythological narratives.
The conversation shifts to contemporary views on Freud's theories, acknowledging significant skepticism within the psychological community:
Josh asserts:
“Most psychologists... are pretty bashful about even talking about this... Most of Freud's theories are pretty discredited.”
(10:55)
Chuck reinforces this critique by mentioning how Freud's ideas are often regarded as outdated and unscientific:
“Psychology came up with... attachment theory... much less creepy than Freud's.”
(14:20)
This section underscores the decline in academic support for Freud's Oedipus Complex, positioning it as largely discredited in modern psychology.
Despite widespread criticism, the hosts explore instances where Freud's ideas have resurfaced in research, albeit contentiously:
Chuck references a study from 2009 published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society:
“They studied the similarities... between men's mothers and their wives... correlations in the 92nd percentile... came up with correlations like, guys really want their moms.”
(11:20)
However, he quickly notes the scientific community's response:
“Other scientists... went through... does not support your conclusions at all.”
(12:18)
Josh offers a nuanced perspective, suggesting that while Freud's theories are flawed, human behavior does sometimes reflect parental influences:
“Kids end up married to someone... like a really good parent... may seek out people like that in your life.”
(13:15)
Chuck adds that sometimes individuals may unconsciously seek out parents' qualities negatively:
“People inadvertently or unconsciously seek out people who are like their parents in the worst ways.”
(13:27)
This balanced examination acknowledges that while Freud's specific claims may lack empirical support, the broader idea of parental influence remains relevant in understanding human relationships.
In wrapping up, Chuck and Josh reflect on the enduring but controversial legacy of the Oedipus Complex:
“More than ever, short stuff is out.”
(14:21)
Josh concludes by affirming the discrediting of Freud’s theories in favor of more robust frameworks like attachment theory, emphasizing the podcast's commitment to providing accessible and up-to-date information:
“Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio... visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever.”
(14:29)
Chuck Bryant: “He never applied the scientific method to any of his theories... based on conjecture.”
(01:35)
Josh Clark: “It occurs during the phallic stage of development, ages 3 to 6... an unconscious feeling of desire for their opposite sex parent and jealousy and envy toward their same sex parent.”
(04:04)
Chuck Bryant: “Freud was like, just wait, just wait because he's going to knock your socks off when he comes along.”
(08:39)
Josh Clark: “But that's not to do with castration anxiety. It's penis envy in girls.”
(07:27)
Chuck Bryant: “Psychology came up with... attachment theory... much less creepy than Freud's.”
(14:20)
This episode of Stuff You Should Know provides a comprehensive overview of Freud's Oedipus Complex, situating it within both its historical origins and contemporary psychological discourse. Through thoughtful dialogue and critical analysis, Chuck and Josh effectively demystify a complex and often misunderstood theory, offering listeners valuable insights into its influence and the reasons behind its eventual decline in scientific circles.
For more insightful discussions and explorations of intriguing topics, tune into Stuff You Should Know on the iHeartRadio app or your preferred podcast platform.