Loading summary
Josh
Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One bank guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too. Thanks, Capital One Bank Guy. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capital1.com bank capital1na member FDIC. Hey, and welcome to the Short Stuff. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck. And Jerry's here too, sitting in for Dave. And this is a very special Short Stuff, Chuck, because Dave requested this topic so long ago that I don't even remember when he did.
Chuck
Yeah. Every once in a while, a colleague will drum up the nerve to approach us very sheepishly, with head bowed, say, what do you guys think about this idea? And Josh will wave them away and say, it shall be on the list in seven years time.
Josh
Yes.
Chuck
Hence or so.
Josh
Right. Give or take seven more years.
Chuck
We shall do outlawry.
Josh
And we are finally. So this one's for you, Dave. And it's a good idea too, because most people think of outlaws as a specific, you know, like.
Chuck
Johnny Cash.
Josh
Yes, exactly. A lot of people think of Johnny Cash when they think outlaw, don't they?
Chuck
Yeah, Outlaw country music. It's a thing.
Josh
But this turns out to have been an actual legal standing. Yes. That could be applied to people. That was not a pleasant thing to have applied to you. And it basically meant that, buddy, you're on your own. It was applied, at least in a lot of cases, to fugitives. But like, we think of fugitives today as like, people who. The US Marshal Service goes and gets, like we talked about in Operation Flagship. That kind of falls under the same rubric, but this was a fugitive in that, like, they were summoned to court, they decided not to come to court, and after a certain procedure, they were declared outlaws. And that that meant, like, the law no longer applies to them. All the protections that are afforded to you are gone. And it does seem a little harsh, I have to say, for just failing to appear in court.
Chuck
Yeah. This is a long time ago, though, so who knows what was going on back then. Sure, mainly medieval England is what we're talking about. But the earliest kind of this outlaw status became a Law in 6th century Frankish law called the Lex Salica. This was under King Clovis, early five hundreds. So this is a long, long time ago. And this is basically like, yeah, if you don't respond to a summons, then you're outside of the king's protection. This kind of started the legal basis for that. But medieval England is where it's sort of most known. If you were over the age of 14 and you were a man, if you were a woman, you were said to be waived, even though it was basically the same thing. Right. But if you were over 14 and you were a male, you could be outlawed and basically say, like you said, like, hey, anything you do or anything anyone does to you, rather, like, we're not even gonna prosecute them. Somebody could break into your house and steal your stuff, and you're an outlaw. So sorry ts for you.
Josh
Yeah. And so, like today, our conception of outlaw or modern conceptions, like, say, applying to Johnny Cash, like you said, or Jesse James or even Robin hood, They're not types to show up to a legal summons. So they definitely do kind of fall into that same category. But we kind of have it backwards in that we think of those people as, like, they chose a life of crime outside the law. Right. They're outlaws. But in reality, with outlawry, the law itself has withdrawn itself from you and left you outside the law. Kind of in a really catty turn. The law is like, oh, you don't recognize my jurisdiction over you? You're not going to come to court when we ask you to? Well, then fine. I guess you don't need my protections anymore either. Hence, you're an outlaw.
Chuck
Exactly. And you mentioned a process. There was a process. It wasn't immediate. It was a pretty slow process even. But what would happen is the sheriff of wherever you were would locate these fugitives. They would do some investigating, see if they owned any property that they could get to. Basically say like, hey, we've got your, you know, your stash of chickens. Come to court and maybe you'll get those chickens back. If that never happens and they can't get them to come to court or whatever, then the sheriff has to sit through this five different times in court, calling, you know, the fugitive to come forward. And after the fifth non appearance, then they hit the gavel or drop the glove or whatever the heck they did back then and said, you, sir, are an outlaw.
Josh
Yeah. And it was a big deal to be declared outlaws. We'll see. I say we take our little break.
Chuck
Let's do it.
Josh
Come back and talk about outlawry a little more. How about that?
Chuck
Let's do it.
Mango
Hey, will, do you ever get overwhelmed by how much science happens these days?
Dave
Constantly. I'm like, ah, there's so much science. I can't keep track of it all.
Mango
Then it's a good thing. Our podcast, Part Time Genius is counting down the 25 greatest science ideas from the past 25 years.
Dave
That's right, Mango. We're talking animals in a paper called.
Mango
Quote, chickens prefer beautiful humans. This was actually the title of the paper. They all discovered that, much like humans, chickens are attracted to symmetrical faces.
Josh
Got it.
Mango
We're talking medical miracles.
Dave
He's an endocrinologist who found a way to stimulate insulin producing cells using, wait for it, the saliva of a Gila monster.
Mango
There's no way to make that not sound crazy.
Dave
We even talked to some of the experts behind these breakthroughs. It's a week full of fact packed stories you won't want to miss. So listen to the Part Time Genius countdown of the 25 greatest science ideas of the past 25 years, starting Monday, March 3rd on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Chuck
Learning stuff is fun with Josh and Chuck Suck.
Josh
Okay, so when you were declared an outlaw, essentially the way I saw it written was that it amounted to a conviction as well as an extinction of civil rights. So there were different kinds of outlawry. Just failing to appear in court seemed like outlaw lite, spelled L I T e. But there was also major outlawry, in which case you were really in trouble. Like big felonies, treason, rebellion, like, big deal stuff could have you labeled a major outlaw. And again, like, if they did find your cache of chickens, those were theirs. Now they could take them any, like real property you had, anything that was yours, they could seize and keep. And that's pretty standard stuff even still today. Like if you get caught with suspected drug money, the sheriff just keeps your money and says, prove it's not drug money. That's not like completely out of the norm. The thing that really makes outlawry very surprising to us today is anybody could come and take your property. Anybody could come and beat you up and kill you. And because the law no longer applied to you, there was no law that was broken when they murdered you. They weren't breaking a law. You had no protection any longer. And that's the thing that makes it really kind of shocking as far as, like a legal formality is concerned to us today.
Chuck
Yeah. And even if someone, you know, your neighbor didn't come and rob your house or try and kill you or something, if you had outlaw status, you were definitely not a part of the community anymore. You were totally ostracized and shunned sometimes. It was just sort of the way that everyone Shunned somebody, which is very quietly and passive aggressively sometimes. It was very much official, though. If they had an outlaw they captured, they could say like, hey, we're going to really ostracize you. We're going to send you to Australia. Have fun over there.
Josh
Yeah. Or America.
Chuck
Yeah.
Josh
And you would end up being an indentured servant. And one of the other things I read about that, that was kind of interesting, that really drove the point home. It's not just like, I'm an indentured servant over here now. I wish I wasn't. Like, maybe around your area, you might have some sympathetic friends that might hide you or bring you food out in the woods or something like that. In America or Australia, you probably knew no one. So you had no help whatsoever. And you truly were ostracized. So that in and of itself was a big deal. Another thing that could happen to you too, is if the sheriff ever did catch up with you, like, there was a very high chance you were just killed on site because you. It was a death sentence for you as well. Like they had no obligation to bring you in if they wanted to just kill you and get over with. The sheriff could do that too.
Chuck
You were so close to saying ostracized.
Josh
Oh, I walked right past that on purpose.
Chuck
Okay.
Josh
I'm kidding. I didn't. Chuck, that was a good one. I'm glad you pointed it out.
Chuck
So this was, you know, usually like real outlaws. Like real criminals. Even if it was something like not appearing in court. You said it was oftentimes a lot worse. But it wasn't always that in some countries. I know we talked about it in our. I think we had a leprosy episode many years ago, right?
Josh
Mm.
Chuck
Yeah. In India, if you had leprosy, you could be banned and ostracized and essentially get something akin to an outlaw status by being sent to a leper colony where you had. Where you didn't have the same rights as everyone else. I think they call leprosy Hansen's disease now.
Josh
Is that right? Mm. Yeah.
Chuck
But no one would know what we meant if we just said that, so.
Josh
Probably not a few people would. And those people were very satisfied that you just said that.
Chuck
Yeah. And I knew the leper was not something that people say anymore.
Josh
No. Yeah. But yeah, I can't remember who Hanson was. I think we talked about them in the episode too. But yeah, that was a long time ago. But it's a good episode. Haven't heard it in a while.
Chuck
Same.
Josh
There were some ways to have your outlaw status revoked. One of them was just showing up to court. There was a specific court you had to go to. It was the King's Bench in London. So you had to make your way to London, and you basically pled to have it removed. And I think that that was part of the procedure, because, again, if you showed up to the court that had called you in the first place, you might be murdered, and that would be that.
Chuck
Yeah.
Josh
So that was, I think, the initial part of the process. And there does seem to be, like, a pretty generous amount of forgiveness for, you know, lesser crimes, I think. Like, that where you just hadn't shown up. Especially if you're like, I'm sorry, my foot. I twisted my ankle jogging, and I. I just couldn't make it to court. Or, you know, my stupid cousin was supposed to. To take me, but his cart broke down, that kind of thing. The court would probably take pity on you and. And remove your outlaw status because now you were playing ball with him, which is the whole point of them conferring you an outlaw is that you hadn't in the first place. What was really shocking to me is that this same stuff could be applied to somebody in a civil case. Like, somebody's like, this guy stole my chickens. I'm going to sue you, and you didn't show up. You could also be considered an outlaw for that, too. That's just nuts.
Chuck
Yeah. That is remarkable to hear.
Josh
And it wasn't until 1879 that England revoked that part of their outlaw statute that it couldn't be used in civil cases anymore. But as far as I know, and I looked high and low for definitive proof of this, but just from references I saw, it seems like there's still outlaw books or outlaw statutes on the books for criminal acts.
Chuck
Wow.
Josh
Yeah.
Chuck
Let's get rid of those.
Josh
So do it. You got anything else?
Chuck
I got nothing else.
Josh
Well, Dave, this was a great idea. Thanks for it. Short stuff is out.
Dave
Stuff youf Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts, my heart radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite show.
Short Stuff: Outlawry – Navigating the Dark History of Legal Exile
In the March 5, 2025 episode of Stuff You Should Know titled "Short Stuff: Outlawry", hosts Josh and Chuck, with Jerry guest-hosting for Dave, delve into the intriguing and grim historical practice of outlawry. This episode provides a comprehensive exploration of outlawry’s origins, processes, consequences, and its stark contrast to modern-day perceptions of outlaws.
The episode opens with Josh and Chuck setting the stage for an in-depth discussion about outlawry—a term often casually associated with rebellious figures like Johnny Cash or Jesse James. At [01:11], Josh remarks:
“Most people think of outlaws as a specific, you know, like Johnny Cash. But this turns out to have been an actual legal standing.”
This distinction sets the tone for the episode, emphasizing that outlawry was not merely a societal label but a formal legal status with severe implications.
Outlawry's Legal Foundation
The conversation traces the origins of outlawry back to the 6th century Frankish law known as Lex Salica, established under King Clovis. At [01:03], Chuck explains:
“The earliest kind of this outlaw status became a Law in 6th century Frankish law called the Lex Salica.”
This early legal framework laid the groundwork for what would become a significant tool for enforcing court appearances and maintaining social order.
Medieval England's Adoption
Outlawry found its most notable application in medieval England. Josh elaborates at [02:23]:
“If you were over the age of 14 and you were a male, you could be outlawed...”
This inclusion criteria underscore how outlawry was systematically applied based on age and gender, reflecting the societal norms of the time.
Summons and Non-Appearance
The process of being declared an outlaw began with a court summons. At [04:20], Josh outlines the procedure:
“The sheriff... would locate these fugitives… after the fifth non-appearance, then they hit the gavel or drop the glove… and said, you, sir, are an outlaw.”
This meticulous process ensured that outlawry was only declared after consistent failure to comply with legal obligations.
Role of Sheriffs
Sheriffs played a crucial role in enforcing outlawry. They were responsible for locating fugitives, seizing property, and actively maintaining the outlaw's excluded status. Chuck adds at [05:09]:
“They could take your property… and if they caught up with you, there was a very high chance you were just killed on site.”
This highlights the extreme risks involved for those declared outlaws.
Loss of Legal Protections
Being declared an outlaw meant losing all legal protections. At [08:09], Josh emphasizes:
“Anybody could come and take your property… and because the law no longer applied to you, there was no law that was broken when they murdered you.”
This complete withdrawal of legal standing left outlaws vulnerable to violence and theft without any recourse.
Social Ostracization
Outlawry also led to social exclusion. Chuck notes at [08:45]:
“If they could say like, hey, we're going to really ostracize you… you had no help whatsoever.”
This enforced isolation ensured that outlaws were entirely cut off from their communities, making survival exceedingly difficult.
Economic Seizures
Outlaws risked having their property seized. Josh explains at [07:45]:
“Like big felonies, treason, rebellion… could have you labeled a major outlaw. If they did find your cache of chickens, those were theirs.”
This ensured that public and private assets were directly seized from the individual, further penalizing them.
Path to Redemption
Outlaw status was not always permanent. There was a possibility to have outlawry revoked by appearing at the King’s Bench in London. At [10:53], Josh states:
“If you showed up to the court that had called you in the first place, you might be murdered… there was a way to plead to have it removed.”
This arduous process required outlaws to demonstrate compliance and repentance to regain their legal protections.
Case Limitations
However, this path was fraught with challenges. Chuck remarks at [12:15]:
“It really was applied to somebody in a civil case… just nuts.”
This indicates that outlawry could be applied even in civil disputes, making it a tool of severe and broad application.
Misconceptions of Outlaws
Today’s portrayal of outlaws often glamorizes rebellion, but historical outlawry was a far more severe and state-enforced measure. At [03:29], Josh contrasts:
“We think of those people as... they chose a life of crime outside the law. But with outlawry, the law itself has withdrawn itself from you.”
This highlights the fundamental difference between voluntary defiance and state-imposed exclusion.
Legislative Evolution
The practice of outlawry has largely been abolished, with the last remnants in England removed in 1879. Josh points out at [12:13]:
“It wasn't until 1879 that England revoked that part of their outlaw statute that it couldn't be used in civil cases anymore.”
This marks the end of a brutal legal practice, aligning legal protections more uniformly across society.
Global Practices of Exclusion
Chuck draws parallels to other cultures, such as in India, where individuals with leprosy (Hansen's disease) were banished to leper colonies. At [10:08], he mentions:
“If you had leprosy, you could be banned and ostracized… akin to outlawry.”
This comparison underscores a universal tendency to exclude and isolate individuals deemed undesirable or dangerous.
Legacy of Outlawry
The episode concludes by reflecting on the harsh realities of outlawry and its lasting impact on legal and social norms. Josh muses at [12:39]:
“There seems to be outlaw statutes on the books for criminal acts…”
Chuck responds emphatically:
“Wow… Let's get rid of those. Do it.”
This exchange encapsulates the consensus that such archaic and inhumane legal practices have no place in the modern world.
"Short Stuff: Outlawry" offers a compelling and thorough exploration of a dark chapter in legal history. By dissecting the origins, processes, and severe consequences of outlawry, Josh and Chuck provide listeners with a nuanced understanding of how societies have historically dealt with defiance and non-compliance. This episode serves as a stark reminder of the importance of legal protections and the evolution of societal norms towards more humane and equitable systems.