Loading summary
Podcast Announcer
This is an Iheart podcast.
Chuck
Guaranteed human.
Sponsor Voice
Quick reminder everybody, tax season is here. Before anyone panics, here's another reminder. Intuit TurboTax is also here with TurboTax Expert full service, you can match with a real tax expert who handles your taxes from start to finish. Like it basically turns tax season into a non event, which is saying something. You can chill, listen to your favorite podcast, maybe ours, and get real time updates on your phone while your TurboTax expert checks every deduction and credit to help get you the best possible outcome.
Josh
Come.
Sponsor Voice
It's that simple. Visit turbotax.com to get started. Real time updates are available in the iOS mobile app. In business, there's no room for guesswork. Every shipment matters. Every deadline counts. When you're trying to keep operations running smoothly, the last thing you need is uncertainty. That's why reliability is at the core of USPS Ground Advantage. Each package moves through a secure nationwide network tracked from dock to door with affordable upfront pricing and delivery you can depend on. Because knowing your logistics are handled lets you focus on everything else. Visit USP usps.com ground advantage to start shipping with confidence. USPS ground advantage.
Josh
Hey, and welcome to the Short Stuff. I'm Josh and there's Chuck. And there's Jerry, and Dave's here in spirit. And this is Short Stuff, which should be spelled exactly like it's spelled right now.
Chuck
Yeah.
Josh
Should another simple spelling movement come along, Chuck?
Chuck
Yeah. Although they may drop an F.
Josh
Yeah, you're right. Although that could be stoof. But there is no such word as stoof, so I guess it wouldn't be a problem.
Chuck
Yeah, but that's what we're talking about. We're talking about the idea that English is a really tough language to learn and that there have been many movements over the years to simplify things and spell things out a little more phonetically. And back in 1906, none other than Teddy Roosevelt, who was president, got into this idea. And he was a very, very popular president who had some other very famous people on board at the time as well, Right.
Josh
Andrew Carnegie, Mark Twain, William James, the father of psychology, an unnamed Supreme Court justice. Basically a lot of thinkers in America came together to basically put their might behind this, what was another progressive movement at the time. And Teddy Roosevelt was an enthusiastic supporter of it. He issued what he later called an experiment, an executive order to the printer of the United States, the official one, and said all federal documents from now on have to be printed using the simplified spelling of these 300 words, and gave them a list and it ended up not going very well at all.
Chuck
Yeah, I mean, this kind of just goes to show you that you can be super, super popular as a public figure or even a politician. And if you come up with an idea that people think are dumb even back then, they turn on you pretty quickly because people hated this idea. He was all over the newspapers being made fun of all of a sudden. And this is a guy that got, like, a lot of great press.
Josh
Right.
Chuck
He was in, you know, political cartoons. There was one where he was. Lang knocked out in a boxing ring with a anthropomorphized dictionary had just knocked him out. And Congress certainly didn't like it because he had sidestepped Congress with this executive order. And they were not having it.
Josh
No, not at all. Like you said, he was mocked for it. And his political opponents in Congress just jumped all over this because he was a beloved president, like you said, and there wasn't a lot that they could use against him. And this was great. So because there was an election coming up, he's like, okay, I'm backing off. You guys win. We'll just stay with the. The dumb rules of grammar and spelling that English has. And let's talk about that a little bit. You want to.
Chuck
Well, they actually even brought a bill against him where they cited Webster's. Like, they demanded that all federal documents be written according to Webster's or other generally accepted dictionaries of the English language. Which is ironic because Webster himself was a proponent of making spelling simpler at one point. And it was also something I know that we've talked about. Benjamin Franklin had also championed this earlier in his career.
Josh
Yeah. And both Noah Webster and Benjamin Franklin had already found out that people don't like the concept of simplifying English for some reason, even though there's reason after reason to do this. Chuck, you want to talk a little bit about how English is kind of screwy?
Chuck
Well, yeah. I mean, anyone who's ever learned the English language knows that the spelling doesn't make a lot of sense a lot of times. And the rules contradict one another all the time. It's a tough language to learn. And you can look no further than the final three letters, ght, at the end of words like caught and though and draft and drought. To know that there just doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason. You know, if you learn English and learn how to spell in English, you're basically just taught, like, you just gotta memorize this stuff. There are no rules which are gonna
Josh
help you out Exactly. And that is the reason why I didn't realize this, but spelling bees are almost entirely an American phenomenon. They're almost entirely an English speaking phenomenon because it's so tricky to spell English words and that even countries that do hold spelling bees typically hold them as English spelling bees.
Chuck
Yeah.
Josh
Which is really saying something about how difficult it is to remember all this stuff in spelling the English language. Yeah.
Chuck
Although to be fair, they're spelling. They're not spelling things like draft, you know.
Josh
No, no. They're spelling anti disestablishmentarianism.
Chuck
Yeah. I think that one's not too hard, actually.
Josh
No, it's not. But it's the one that always gets thrown out because it's fun to sing.
Chuck
The hard part for me would be doing it in my brain. I would have to write it down. I think Emily was a champion spelling
Josh
bee kid, as was my gal.
Chuck
Yeah. So they're both great spellers. I'm an okay speller, but yeah, I would have to write it down. I have a hard time doing that in my brain.
Josh
Yeah. Way hard. It's much harder to do it just in your brain, for sure. I think you have to be like a visual person to be able to kind of see it in front of you, too. That's got to help.
Chuck
Yeah.
Josh
The thing I think that this. I don't know if we said it or not, but the group with Andrew Carnegie and Mark Twain, they founded what was known as the. This is official, the Simplified Spelling Board. And what the Simplified Spelling Board was trying to do, as far as they were concerned, was just kind of hasten what was already an organic, naturally occurring process of making it easier to spell English words. And a really good example that I saw was that in Elizabethan England, or Beethan, depending on where you are speaking English, fish was spelled F y S H e. And at some point, naturally, there was no board telling everyone to do this. Which I think ultimately is what people's problem is with this. It's somebody saying, we're going to do this. Now, just naturally it happened that people started spelling fish F I s h instead. It makes way more sense. It is easier to spell F y S H E was clearly the invention of a madman. So that happens anyway. I mean, that's also the reason why in the United States we don't spell like honor or color with an ou like they do in the UK or Canada or Australia, or we don't spell program with an extra m E at the end. Because at some point the people in the United States said We're just going to start spelling this. It's just easier this way. And so what the simplified spelling board was saying is, like, we're just trying to move all this along to its inevitable conclusion. Do we have to wait like a thousand years before it just happens on its own?
Chuck
No, but we do have to wait a very short time while we take a break. And then short stuff will be right back.
T-Mobile Advertiser 1
Hey, Donald, really flying on that treadmill.
T-Mobile Advertiser 2
I'm trying to run as fast AS T mobile 5G home Internet, Zach.
T-Mobile Advertiser 1
Well, you better pick it up because now T Mobile has the fastest 5G home Internet according to OOKLA Speed Test.
T-Mobile Advertiser 2
Really?
Josh
How's this?
T-Mobile Advertiser 1
T Mobile's faster than that, bud. Speed up.
Chuck
No.
T-Mobile Advertiser 1
Plus, they've got a five year price guarantee. Come on, faster.
T-Mobile Advertiser 2
How can I go any faster?
T-Mobile Advertiser 1
Channel the speed of t mobile 5G home Internet. Think 100 meter dash fast. Think drag racing fast. Think speed skating fast. Now let's bump up your speed a notch.
T-Mobile Advertiser 2
Hey, whoa, whoa. That's too fast.
T-Mobile Advertiser 1
You'll be all right. Just walk it off.
T-Mobile Advertiser 2
Get on the fast track. T Mobile now has the fastest 5G home Internet. And for a limited time, it starts at just 30 bucks a month with autopay and a voice line, plus a five year price guarantee, plus taxes and fees. Fastest according to Ooklab speedtest intelligence data. 2nd Half 2025 all rights reserved. Guarantee for monthly price of 5G Internet data on eligible plans. Find exclusions and details@t mobile.com.
Josh
So again, this is not the first and only time people have proposed simplified spelling. There have also been other initiatives to not only simplify the spelling of English words, but also to kind of straighten out some of the weirder rules of grammar, too. And there's a guy named James Ruggles. He was an Ohio teacher, and he said, we're going to spell know K N o W the way that it should be spelled, N O e in the present tense. Like, I know Chuck is great. But instead of knew K N e W for past tense, we're going to say knowed. Like, I've always knowed that Chuck is great.
Chuck
Yeah. So, you know, therein presents part of the problem. If you're a literate human and you look at something phonetically or say something like, I knowed that, it makes you sound like you're maybe not so smart.
Josh
Right.
Chuck
So that's kind of the issue, is that the people always pushing for this are probably like the hyper literate. And they're not gonna push for something that looks like it's not.
Josh
Yeah, but what's weird is you do have occurrences of people in history like Mark Twain and Andrew Carnegie. Like, it's weird. Yes, but there's like a roadblock in that. Yes, people who are well versed in English literacy do see this as kind of like there's something wrong with it. But those are also the same people who have kind of started initiatives in the past. So I don't know what the deal is. I don't know if we're ever going to do this to you.
Chuck
I don't know. I mean, what I wonder is how far Twain and that board was pushing things. Because it's one thing to spell, you know, thought or though T, H, O, which is how people do it on text now. Or T, H, O, E, maybe. And then to say, like, I knowed that guy. You know what I mean?
Josh
Yeah, No, I do know. You mean.
Chuck
Yeah, one's a little further, I think, than the other.
Josh
Well, so, yeah, I'm not exactly how far they were pushing it either, but I do know that they backed off big time after Teddy Roosevelt got his. His campaign hat handed to him by Congress. Right.
Chuck
Yeah.
Josh
So it just died down for decades. And it wasn't until the 70s that it came up again from a guy named Edward Ronthaler. And he was the chairman of the American Literacy Council. He not only saw a need to simplify spelling just for the sake that it could be simplified, he traced the problem of having trouble learning English and illiteracy rates to dropping out of school and then turning to a life of crime. So to him, simplifying English would actually help alleviate America's crime problem, which was a big deal from the 70s to the 90s. Yeah.
Chuck
And he thought, like, computers are coming along now. This will be the perfect time to make this transition because we can have computer programs sort of just convert this stuff automatically and into the simplified form, and then before you know it, everyone will just sort of, you know, adopt this as it becomes the regular thing in computers.
Josh
Right. So America seems to be doing pretty good. There's a 99% literacy rate among Americans. That seems to be, like, fairly where it is throughout the English speaking world. But something that I didn't realize, Chuck, is that that just talks about basic literacy, like just being able to read. Like you can sound out words and read. You understand the basic building blocks of English grammar. 99% of Americans know how to do that. But when you talk about functional literacy, it drops precipitously.
Chuck
Yeah, this number surprises me.
Josh
Me, too.
Chuck
Apparently 21% of Americans are functionally illiterate, which, yeah, that's. That seems high, but, you know, if that's the stat, that's the stat.
Josh
Yeah. And to be functionally illiterate means that you can read, but you have trouble navigating life as an adult in the English speaking world, say, like, reading tax forms or something like that, because you're basically literate, but not functionally literate. Yeah. 21% of Americans, by the way, equals 71 million people.
Chuck
Yeah, that's a lot of folks. So, yeah, I mean, there's a case to be made. I think people are doing it on their own a little bit, like I said, through texts. But I don't think, like, you know, proper graded spelling is ever going to change that much. I think that ship has kind of sailed.
Josh
Yeah, for sure. Before we go, thank you very much to history.com, tIME, Paleofuture, Smithsonian, and the Uncle John's Bathroom Reader, who introduced this to me. God, when I was probably 15. We're finally getting around to do it, Chuck.
Chuck
Yeah.
Josh
This is.
Chuck
How many years later is that?
Josh
Like 20.
Chuck
Okay, great. Happy birthday.
Josh
Short Stuff is out.
Podcast Announcer
Stuff youf Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts, my heart radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Podcast: Stuff You Should Know
Episode: Short Stuff: Simple Spelling Movement
Release Date: April 1, 2026
Hosts: Josh and Chuck
In this "Short Stuff" episode, Josh and Chuck explore the long and quirky history of attempts to simplify English spelling. Focusing especially on Teddy Roosevelt’s early 20th-century efforts—and moving through 20th-century reformers like Edward Rondthaler—they discuss why English spelling is such a mess, famous supporters of reform, and the cultural resistance to changing how we write. The tone is humorous, light, and slightly incredulous at the strange turns in spelling history.
[01:37]
[01:37] Chuck:
“We’re talking about the idea that English is a really tough language to learn and that there have been many movements over the years to simplify things and spell things out a little more phonetically.”
[02:04–03:31]
[02:49] Chuck:
“This kind of just goes to show you that you can be super, super popular as a public figure or even a politician. And if you come up with an idea that people think are dumb…they turn on you pretty quickly because people hated this idea.”
[04:00–04:44]
[04:27] Josh:
“Both Noah Webster and Benjamin Franklin had already found out that people don’t like the concept of simplifying English for some reason, even though there’s reason after reason to do this.”
[04:44–05:39]
[05:18] Josh:
“Spelling bees are almost entirely an American phenomenon...because it’s so tricky to spell English words.”
[06:35–08:11]
[07:45] Josh:
“At some point the people in the United States said, ‘We’re just going to start spelling this. It’s just easier this way.’”
[09:40–12:52]
[10:18] Chuck:
“If you’re a literate human and you look at something phonetically or say something like ‘I knowed that,’ it makes you sound like you’re maybe not so smart.”
[12:52–14:01]
[13:31] Chuck:
“Apparently 21% of Americans are functionally illiterate, which…seems high, but, you know, if that’s the stat, that’s the stat.”
[14:01–14:16]
[14:16] Chuck:
“Yeah, I mean, there’s a case to be made. I think people are doing it on their own a little bit, like I said, through texts. But I don’t think…proper, graded spelling is ever going to change that much.”
On the futility of trying to reform English spelling:
[06:39] Josh:
“Do we have to wait like a thousand years before it just happens on its own?”
On English spelling idiosyncrasies:
[04:44] Chuck:
“There just doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason…If you learn English and learn how to spell in English, you’re basically just taught, like, you just gotta memorize this stuff. There are no rules...”
On Roosevelt’s short-lived experiment:
[03:31] Josh:
“Because there was an election coming up, he’s like, okay, I’m backing off. You guys win. We’ll just stay with the…dumb rules of grammar and spelling that English has.”
On literacy statistics:
[13:42] Josh:
“To be functionally illiterate means that you can read, but you have trouble navigating life as an adult…because you’re basically literate, but not functionally literate.”
[14:16] Josh:
Acknowledges history.com, TIME, Paleofuture, Smithsonian, and Uncle John’s Bathroom Reader as sources for the episode's research.
This episode is a breezy, informative look at both the history and the (very human) resistance to making English any easier to spell—grounded in surprising historical footnotes and contemporary statistics, and punctuated by Josh and Chuck’s affable banter.