What To Do With All This Nuclear Waste?

Summary

Stuff You Should Know: "What To Do With All This Nuclear Waste?"

Episode date: November 4, 2025 | Hosts: Josh Clark & Chuck Bryant

---

Main Theme & Purpose

In this episode, Josh and Chuck tackle one of the thorniest, most persistent issues in energy and environmental science: what should we do with all the dangerous nuclear waste generated by decades of nuclear power and weapons programs? They demystify what nuclear waste really is, break down the various types and how they're currently handled, survey global efforts (including Finland's "permanent" storage), and explore emerging ideas that could safely recycle or neutralize this hazardous byproduct. Throughout, they keep things approachable, humorous, but also serious about the stakes.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Pop Culture vs. Reality: What Is Nuclear Waste? (01:41–03:42)

• Chuck sets the tone with a Homer Simpson joke, highlighting how pop culture ("green goo," glowing rods) misinforms us about what nuclear waste really looks like.
• Josh clarifies: Most nuclear waste is NOT green or glowing. Some is sludge-like, but typically we're talking about solid metal pellets.
  • "The closest you can get to that from what I can tell is toxic nuclear sludge that is described as having kind of a peanut buttery consistency—which is gross and dangerous, you know." (Josh, 02:45)

2. What Actually Happens to Spent Nuclear Fuel? (03:42–07:14)

• Spent fuel: The “most dangerous kind” is the burned-out uranium pellets inside fuel rods.
  • Size: "About midway up your thumb" (Chuck, 03:59) — roughly “half a thumb.”
• After five or six years in a reactor, these rods become "spent" and must be replaced.
• Since the 1940s, no country (until very recently) has come close to a truly permanent disposal method.

3. The Surprising Scale of Nuclear Waste (05:11–06:43)

• Each individual American’s ‘share’ of lifetime nuclear waste: About the size of a hockey puck.
  • “If you took all the nuclear power that you used... all of that nuclear waste would be compressed to about a hockey puck.” (Josh, 05:43)
• Nationwide, it adds up: ~90,000 tons in the US alone — "Eye-popping, but not that much," per Josh; the issue is how dangerous it is and for how long.

4. Nuclear Reactor Basics & What Happens After (07:14–12:07)

• Quick refresher on nuclear power: Uranium pellets in fuel rods boil water to create steam, generating electricity (no emissions!).
• Spent fuel is initially moved while still underwater, via canals to "spent fuel pools."
  • These pools are “huge... about 40ft of water in it... and they stay there for years because they're so hot and so radioactive.” (Josh, 11:09)
  • Keeping them underwater prevents explosions and environmental release of radioactive elements like cesium-137.

5. Dry Cask Storage: The “Temporary” Solution (12:44–17:42)

• After years in pools, the (slightly) less hot rods are zipped into giant dry casks: huge, thick steel and concrete containers stored above ground “out back.”
  • “That’s what they're doing, man... you stay here until we can figure out what to do with you 100 years from now.” (Josh, 13:47)
• First used in the U.S. in 1986, these casks are rated for about 100 years — but the problem is that clock is already ticking, and it’s not a true long-term fix.

6. America's Long-Stalled Permanent Solution: Yucca Mountain (16:31–18:50)

• The U.S. tried (and failed) to build a geological repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, but local and political opposition (and President Obama in 2010) shuttered the project.
  • "So it's just totally in limbo." (Josh, 17:42)
• For now, “consolidated interim storage sites” in Texas and New Mexico are proposed, but all solutions are interim. At current rates, even the biggest sites fill up in about 15 years.

7. Finland & The World's First "Permanent" Repository (22:17–28:23)

• Finland's Onkalo Facility: Deep-bedrock repository, 1430 feet down (220x an Olympic pool for scale), storing spent fuel assemblies inside steel and copper canisters, surrounded by swelling clay (bentonite) for a tight seal.
  • “The clay...forms a seal around the canisters. And we just have to hope that they did the math correctly and it doesn't pop the canisters open from the surrounding pressure.” (Josh, 24:17)
• Can store waste for centuries; claimed to last 100,000 years — but the hosts note the “permanent” designation is iffy given things like climate change, earthquakes, or societal collapse.
  • “Nobody knows what's going to happen in thousands and thousands of years, so you can't really call it permanent.” (Chuck, 22:25)

8. How Long is Nuclear Waste Really Dangerous? (25:58–28:06)

• Huge uncertainty: Depending on whom you ask (and which isotope), the danger may last decades, centuries, or millions of years.
  • Notable isotopes: Iodine-129 (half-life: 15 million years!), Cesium-131 (30 years)
  • “It's just all over the place. And that actually is a little bit unnerving.” (Josh, 27:27)

9. The Vast Majority Is “Low-Level” Waste (28:23–29:28)

• Only 3% of all nuclear waste is the dangerous high-level stuff — but it accounts for 95% of the radioactivity.
• Over 90% is low-level: gloves, clothing, tools, concrete — decays to safe levels in 20–30 years and treated like regular landfill.
  • U.S. has four disposal sites: SC, WA, UT, TX.

10. Transuranic Waste & Weapons Production (29:29–32:23)

• Waste from military plutonium production lasts millions of years (“transuranic waste”); stored deep in underground salt at New Mexico’s Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
  • "We did an episode on nuclear semiotics...trying to figure out how to communicate with people 10,000 years in the future." (Josh, 30:43)

11. Decommissioning Power Plants & Liquid Waste (32:38–36:23)

• Decommissioning creates more low-level waste, but the most concerning material is always the spent fuel.
• The cooling water from nuclear plants is cleaned and then dumped into nearby oceans/rivers.
  • Chuck expresses skepticism about this solution’s safety: "I just don't see how that water can ever be good enough to dump into an ocean or a lake." (35:26)
  • Josh: the main defense is dilution after removing as much radioactive material as possible.

12. Emerging Solutions: Recycling and Beyond (40:27–50:43)

• Many spent rods still have TONS of energy — just not enough for traditional reactors.
  • New, more sensitive advanced reactors could use them, or reprocess the materials into new fuel pellets.
  • “Oklo...estimate[s] that the unused spent fuel that we're talking about just burying...could power the entire United States for the next 150 years.” (Josh, 41:43)
  • Oak Ridge, TN, recycling pilot project: up to 94% of uranium recoverable.
• Problems: Security — risk of weapons proliferation if plutonium is recovered.
  • “That’s a huge risk, but it’s not something we can’t figure out, you know.” (Josh, 43:54)
  • Some skepticism that AI interests (like Oklo, funded by OpenAI’s Sam Altman) are driving these innovations primarily for their own power needs, not humanity’s at large. (45:12)

13. New Tech: Transmutation, Glass, Ceramics (46:52–50:42)

• Transmutation: Bombarding the most dangerous parts of waste with neutrons in particle accelerators to make them less radioactive.
• Vitrification: Embedding nuclear waste into glass or ceramics, creating stable, sealed logs.
  • “You're actually trapping the radioactive particles in glass, not inside glass as part of glass. It's really genius.” (Josh, 48:56)
• Even if we can't use the energy, extracting the "worst" waste and leaving the rest would dramatically reduce the long-term problem.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

With timestamps and attribution:

• On pop culture vs. reality:

  • “I mean, it's just hard not to think of Homer Simpson when you're talking about nuclear power at all.” — Chuck (01:59)
  • "Nuclear waste doesn't really look like that. It certainly doesn't glow green." — Josh (02:17)

• On U.S. solutions:

  • "We're just basically stashing it over here until we can figure out what to do with it in the long term. And we've been doing that for half a century.” — Josh (09:08)

• On Finland’s deep storage:

  • “The clay... forms a seal around the canisters. And we just have to hope that they did the math correctly and it doesn't pop the canisters open from the surrounding pressure.” — Josh (24:17)

• On the timescale of waste:

  • "Nobody knows what's going to happen in thousands and thousands of years, so you can't really call it permanent.” — Chuck (22:25)
  • "It's just all over the place. And that actually is a little bit unnerving... if anything, you should err on the side of caution." — Josh (27:27)

• Humorous sidebar:

  • "I did not get the memo that we have abandoned Big Macs in favor of, I guess, Olympic pools." — Chuck (24:33)

• On disposal skepticism:

  • "I just don't see how that water can ever be good enough to dump into an ocean or a lake." — Chuck (35:26)

• On recycling the “unusable” waste:

  • "The idea is to just bury and forget about it. And it's so stupid that it actually could be considered a lucky break that Yucca Mountain didn't work out back in 2010. And it's in limbo because it bought time for people to come up with other ideas rather than just bury the stuff—that's just such a total waste." — Josh (41:43)

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• 01:41 – Pop culture vs. real nuclear waste
• 03:42 – Types of nuclear waste, how spent fuel is managed
• 05:43 – Personal scale/amount of waste generated per person
• 07:14 – How nuclear reactors and fuel assemblies work
• 12:07 – Why spent fuel stays in water (risk of explosion)
• 13:45 – Transition to dry cask storage
• 16:31 – The failed Yucca Mountain project and the “interim” problem
• 22:17 – Finland’s deep repository (“Onkalo”), methods, global implications
• 28:23 – Breakdown of high- vs. low-level waste and transuranic discussion
• 30:43 – Communicating danger to future civilizations (nuclear semiotics)
• 32:38 – Decommissioning old reactors & cleaning/dumping coolant water
• 40:27 – Renaissance of recycling nuclear waste: potential and obstacles
• 46:52 – Transmutation, vitrification, futuristic nuclear waste solutions

---

Takeaways & Conclusion

Josh and Chuck ultimately communicate that the world has postponed dealing with the fundamental problem of nuclear waste for decades, often leaving spent fuel in temporary solutions with time-limited security and environmental risk.

There's hope in advanced reactors, chemical reprocessing, options like vitrification, and even particle physics—many of which could convert radioactive waste into less dangerous material and potentially extract useful energy. But these all come with hurdles: money, public trust, international security, technical limits, and huge timescales.

Meanwhile, as Chuck puts it, the best anyone can do is:
"Go forth and recycle your uranium pellets in your home." (Chuck, 50:46)

---

Further Listening

• Nuclear Energy episodes (including Fukushima and Can Nuclear Fusion Reactors Save the World?)
• Nuclear semiotics episode

---

This summary skips advertisements and non-content sections, focusing on the core discussion on nuclear waste—its science, challenges, and possible futures—as delivered in the original engaging, humorous Stuff You Should Know style.

Transcript

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

This is an I Heart Podcast.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Living with a rare autoimmune condition comes with challenges but also incredible strength. Especially for those living with conditions like myasthenia gravis or mg, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, otherwise known as cidp, finding empowerment in the community is critical. Untold Stories Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition. A Ruby Studio production in partnership with Argenics and explores people discovering strength in the most unexpected places. Listen to untold Stories on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One bank guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too. Thanks Capital One Bank Guy. What's in your wallet? Terms apply seecapital1.com Bank Capital One NA Member FDIC the universe is full of mysteries. Black holes, quantum physics, galaxies. On TikTok, millions of people are learning more about the universe around them every day. Scientists break down complex theories, demonstrate experiments, and connect dots between the cosmos and our daily lives. One scroll might reveal the concepts on the fabric of spacetime. The the next in optical illusion. It's discovery on a massive scale where millions learn something new every day.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Welcome to Stuff youf Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh. And there's Chuck. And Jerry's here too. And this is a good old fashioned episode of Stuff youf Should Know. Are you talking about the green goo?

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, I mean, it's just hard not to think of Homer Simpson when you're talking about nuclear power at all.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah, and nuclear waste in particular. Right?

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. Like, you know that little rod flies right into his hood.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Right? This inanimate carbon rod is the employee of the year, I think.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

That's right.

[Joshua D. Clark]

So, yeah, it turns out that nuclear waste doesn't really look like that. It certainly doesn't glow green. Probably the closest you could get to what the Simpsons depict. And not just the Simpsons. I think the classic movie Men at Work, featuring brothers Emilio Estevez and Charlie Sheen.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Never saw it.

[Joshua D. Clark]

It's good. As far as 80s comedies go, it's pretty good.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Right?

[Joshua D. Clark]

And they play a lot of 2 Live Crew, too.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Oh, wow. There you go.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Because I think it takes place in Miami. I'm not sure, but the closest you can get to that from what I Can tell is sludge, toxic nuclear sludge that is described as having kind of a peanut buttery consistency, which is gross and dangerous, you know.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, it's not a sandwich you want unless you cut the crust off.

[Joshua D. Clark]

So for the most part, though, nuclear waste is solid. It's like pellets of solid, essentially metal material made up of a bunch of different elements and metals and all sorts of crud pressed together to form essentially a uranium fuel is what it starts out as, but after it undergoes nuclear fission for five or six years, it says, I'm spent, get me out of here, and a new fuel assembly brought in.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, that's right. And this is clearly the most dangerous kind of nuclear waste. We're going to go over, you know, several different kinds of nuclear waste, but this is the stuff that you really, really got to take care of. I mean, you got to take care of all it, of course, but this is stuff that's super dangerous.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Right.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

And these pellets are these little cylinders about the size, I guess it depends on your thumb, but you know, like midway up your thumb. Half a thumb.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Okay, half thumb. Anything but metric.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, not the thumb stump, like the actual thumb print section of your thumb.

[Joshua D. Clark]

The thumb sprout.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, the thumb sprout, exactly. And, you know, disposing of this stuff is sort of the highest level of concern because we have to do it safely. There's not a place in the world that has a permanent solution for this, even though Finland is pretty close to, you know, I'm going to put scare quotes, as you call them, around a permanent solution, because who knows what permanent means, you know, in 50,000 years. And we were going to build one of these in 2010, and we'll talk about why that didn't happen. But since the 1940s, we've had a lot of different kinds of nuclear waste to dispose of, and we've been getting rid of it and storing it in a few different ways since then. But there's potentially a brighter future ahead with some pretty ingenious ideas.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah, fingers crossed. Because right now we're going down the road that was proposed a long time ago, and it's kind of a dumb, unnecessary road, and hopefully smarter heads will prevail. But, yeah, we'll get into that later. But one thing I thought was fascinating is that there is way less nuclear waste than you would think. Right. I think something like if you took all of the nuclear power that you used, you, Chuck used for your entire lifetime. Moment of birth.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yep.

[Joshua D. Clark]

The moment you die in a couple of years. All of now, far longer than that. I hope so all of that nuclear waste would be compressed to about a hockey puck. So each of us in the United States have a hockey puck's worth of nuclear waste assigned to us. And each of us has to figure out what to do with that hockey puck individually. That's the new standard.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

That's right. And by the way, if people think I do have Chuck Stradamus powers of the future, please do not get concerned that I foretold my death in two years. It's okay.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Okay. I don't know if that erased it for everybody, but. All right, it was a good attempt.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

I could just hear someone out there being like, oh, no, no, no. Chuck said he's gonna die in two years. He shan't even say things like that. Lest we forget Jared and Hugh Jackman.

[Joshua D. Clark]

I mean, I don't like you saying it, but, you know, I'm nervously laughing instead.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

All right, so we should kind of quickly go over how nuclear reactors work, even though we have a pretty great episode on that.

[Joshua D. Clark]

But the upshot of all this is even though each of us just has a hockey puck's worth of nuclear waste and it amounts to, I think, like 90,000 tons, which is eye popping in the United States alone. It's eye popping, but it's actually not that much. The problem is it's very dangerous for a very long time afterward. And you have to put it in very, very special places. And those special places are essentially what we're going to kind of go over today.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. Disposing of that stuff.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

We have a pretty good episode on nuclear energy. I can't remember what it was called. Do you happen. Did you check that?

[Joshua D. Clark]

I know the only one I can think of where we really talked about what happens in nuclear reactors was Fukushima, the kind of.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Like, I thought we did one just on creative nuclear energy.

[Joshua D. Clark]

No, I don't know, man. I don't think so.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

All right, well, we'll go over it quickly again just how it works, because it works, how creating energy works at a coal plant or a natural gas plant. Because what you're essentially trying to do is boil water to produce steam, and that steam turns a turbine. But in this case, the fuel is not coal or natural gas. It's these little uranium 235 pellets, like I said, sort of a half of a thumb size. And you mentioned fuel assembly. A fuel assembly. Well, you get these little pellets, you put them inside these long fuel rods, and then you bundle together Those fuel rods, and those are the fuel assemblies. And depending on the size of the reactor and the type, there's anywhere from 150 to about 800 of those bundled up cylindrical fuel rods as fuel assemblies in the reactor core.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Right. And they're, they're kept underwater. And the water does a couple of things. One, it actually helps carry out the nuclear chain reaction that produces the heat that boils the water, that produces the steam that turns the turbine, that creates the electricity. Right. But it also keeps it from going critical. It also cools it. So there's a constant flow of water in and out to maintain it at a fairly constant temperature at like 115 Fahrenheit or something like that. And what's great about this is this is a, it's a self contained process.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Unlike burning natural gas or coal, there's no emissions. And everybody says hooray, no emissions. And then they say, yes, but we also have this nuclear waste as a result. And everybody said, aw. So that's where we stand. Nuclear power has a lot of promise if done well, especially with some of the advanced designs that are coming down the pike. It's not a bad energy source. It's just we haven't figured out what to do with the nuclear fuel. And that's such an understatement, Chuck, that if you actually, once you start figuring out what we're doing with our spent nuclear fuel, it's almost embarrassing that this is what we're doing. We're just basically stashing it over here until we can figure out what to do with it in the long term. And we've been doing that for half a century.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, yeah, it's been going on for a long time. The thing is, you know, these things wear out, which is why we have to remove. You know, once you spin that fuel, just like a lump of coal would get spent. You got to do the same with the nuclear stuff. So every, I think five or six years it can go before it's basically on empty. But it's not on empty, as we'll see because there's still a little bit of juice left, just not enough to power sort of the old school reactors.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Right.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

So every year and a half to two years a nuclear reactor is going to close the doors and they're going to cycle through about a third of their fuel assemblies and get rid of those. And that is the, the really high level nuclear waste that is the most concerning and the stuff that we need to be the most judicious with.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yes, very fortunately, they don't just take these fuel assemblies and toss them out back into an ever growing pile. They kind of do, but there's a little more to it. What they do initially is so remember these things are underwater and they're underwater for a reason. Not just for to, to carry out the chain reaction that produces power, but also to keep them from going critical. So they're moved from the reactor core to what are called spent fuel pools. I want to say spent fuel fuels every time I say that out loud, but can't. So they're they. And they never leave the water. They're taken down these special canals that are, that connect the core, the reactor core to the spent fuel pools and just add a little charm to it. They actually attach them to the bottom of a gondola that through the canal. It is very cute. And then once they get to the spent fuel pool, they're basically dropped into this huge pool, stainless steel pool that has about 40ft of water in it. And they're, I don't know, I think about 10ft or so tall. So they sink down the bottom. They've got 20, 30ft of water over them and they stay there for years because they're so hot and they're so radioactive and it would be insane to do anything else with them. But basically put them in the pools and let them sit there for a while.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, you can look up a picture of a spent fuel pool and it's really cool looking. And like you said, I mean, two to five years just for these things to cool off, they decay a little bit as far as the radioactivity goes. But you know, that's a process that for the most critical stuff that takes thousands of years. So it's really just a blip of radioactivity that decays in that two to five years. But what they're really doing is cooling that stuff down. Because if they even pulled it out to transport it and didn't do so in a canal, it seems like it would just combust. Right? Isn't that the idea?

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. A fuel assembly, especially a bunch of fuel assemblies exposed to air, would just produce so much heat that they would blow up. And when they blew up. Remember these are fairly recent spent fuel rods. They would release a lot of really bad stuff like cesium 137 that spreads in the air very quickly. It settles into the environment very quickly. It enters the food chain and it causes all sorts of problems. When it enters the body and it sticks around for a while. It's one of the big problems with nuclear waste. So you want to keep those spent fuel assemblies underwater for basically as long as you possibly can before you put them into basically, dry dock. And this is where essentially what I was saying, where they just toss them out back. That's what they do. But they put them into something called a dry cask first. And it's a little. A little more technical than just throwing it into a pile, but it's, in principle, roughly the same thing.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

That's very funny to me that you keep liking it to throwing it out.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Back in a pile, because that's what they're doing, man. These dry casks, from a pool to a dry cask on the same site, and they just sit there in the dry cask like, okay, you stay here until we can figure out what to do with you 100 years from now.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

So for the first couple of decades that we had this stuff, all of it was just in those cooling pools. But those pools started to fill up. They're all on site. It's not like they have to transport them, except very locally via canal. And then they said, hey, these pools are filling up. We gotta come up with a better way. They started looking into the dry cask method in the 70s, and I think in 86 in the United States, at the Surrey nuclear power plant in Virginia is where we had our first dry storage facility. And these casks are about 20ft tall, 8ft in diameter, weigh about 100 tons. And in that cask is several dozen of those fuel assemblies. And again, those fuel assemblies are made up of the individual fuel rods that are holding the pellets. So several dozen of those stacked together, sealed inside a canister, they bolt it shut, suck out the air, and replace it with inert gas. And then that steel canister is surrounded by a thick concrete wall, and they throw it out back, right?

[Joshua D. Clark]

They stand it up out back. And the inert gas acts as a coolant rather than using water, which would corrode things. The inert gas can also absorb the radiation and the heat. And then the concrete they use is like very special concrete with polymer fibers and added boron to make it even denser. And then they also mix in magnetite and barite to essentially absorb radioactive particles. So it's like the dry casks are pretty, pretty good. As far as I know, though, they're only rated for about 100 years of storage. And after that, they're like, we're not guaranteeing anything. And so I think you said the first one was sealed up in 1986.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

So we're at 40 years essentially already ticking off the clock for those earliest dry casks that were sealed, which when you start to think of it like that, like it makes this like getting to a solution of what to do long term permanent storage, essentially that how important it is to do it as soon as possible. Because if we don't figure out exactly how to do it and then start building it, that 60 years is going to come and go quicker than we think. That's a long time to design something that's one of probably the most persistent problems that the world faces, environmentally spent nuclear fuel.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, for sure. Right now the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the nrc, is looking at applications for a couple of larger storage sites here in the US for those dry casts, one in New Mexico and one in Texas. These are called consolidated interim storage sites, again, because it's just, you know, temporary. And I think all over the world about 70% of the fuel that's used up is in pools. About 30% is in these dry casks. And these things supposedly are built to withstand natural disasters and things like that. But like you said, they're stored either on or near the surface. It's not like they're buried in bedrock, which we'll see is maybe a more permanent solution. And in fact, that's the one that the US Was working on inside the Yucca Mountain in Nevada and it had NRC and EPA approval, but Nevada said, nope, we don't want that here. Obama canceled it in 2010, and so far we don't have a new sort of, again, scare quote, permanent solution here.

[Joshua D. Clark]

In the U.S. yeah, the big problem is in 1987, Congress said yucca Mountain is the only site that the DOE and the NRC can use to dispose of nuclear waste. You can't put it anywhere else geologically for long term storage. And then they never went back and said, well, since we're not going to put it at Yucca Mountain, we'll do it here instead. So it's just totally in limbo. So in the interim, literally these interim storage sites, like you said in Texas and New Mexico, that's kind of the next big hope after the dry casks. I think the one in New Mexico will be capable of containing 120,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel, which is a lot, especially considering that the US has only about 90,000 tons of spent fuel total. But we're also adding about 2,000 tons a year. So in 15 years, New Mexico would be full up. So again, you kind of see how this clock is ticking because it's not like anyone saying, well, let's wait on nuclear power any further until we figure out what to do with this. They're just, it's just a go, go swinging kind of industry. You know.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Maybe we should go, go, go on a break. Yeah, and I promised talk of Finland earlier and maybe we'll pick up with that right after this. Support for the show today comes from public.com you're thoughtful about where your money goes. You've got core holdings, some recurring crypto buys, maybe even a few strategic options plays on the side. The point is you're engaged with your investments and Public gets that.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah, that's why they built an investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public, you can put together a multi asset portfolio for the long haul. Stocks, bonds, options, crypto. It's all there. Plus an industry leading 3.6% APY high yield cash account.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Switch to the platform built for those who take investing seriously. Go to public.comsysk and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.comsysk paid for by Public Investing. All investing involves risk of loss, including loss of principal. Brokerage services for U.S. listed registered securities options and bonds in a self directed account are offered by Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Crypto trading provided by ZeroHash complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures.

[Advertisement Voice]

Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? Wash away your worries with Anabe. Annabe is the only machine washable sofa inside and out where designer quality meets budget friendly prices. That's right, sofas start at just $699. Enjoy a no risk experience with pet friendly stain resistant and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabric Experience cloud like comfort with high resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Shop washablesofas.com for early Black Friday savings up to 60% off site wide backed by a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back Upgrade [e-mail] Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Hey everybody, we want to talk to you about Squarespace and in particular, if you have a great idea that want to sell on the web. Well, Squarespace makes it easy to sell access to content on your Websites.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

That's right. You can do online courses, you can do blogs, videos, memberships. You can even earn recurring revenue by gating your content behind a paywall. Simply set the price and choose whether to charge a one time fee or a subscription for access.

[Joshua D. Clark]

That's right. And you can get your content discovered fast with integrated SEO tools. Every Squarespace website is optimized to be indexed with meta descriptions, an auto generated sitemap and more. So you show up more often to more people in global search engine results.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Just go to squarespace.com stuff and you can get a free trial. And when you're ready to launch, use our offer code stuff S T U F F to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or a domain.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Learn some stuff with Joshua and character.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

All right, so we mentioned Finland early on as being kind of the only place in the world now that is close to being done with a again, scare quote permanent solution. And the reason we keep saying scare quotes is because, you know, you sent me some information that was like, hey, nobody knows what's going to happen in thousands and thousands of years, so you can't really call it permanent. When there's climate change and potential asteroid impacts and things like that. We just don't know what's coming our way. So you can't really say it's permanent, but they're calling it permanent. Even. So this one is called Ankalo, which means cavity or pit. And it's the first on planet Earth geologic repository where supposedly they say that you can store this stuff close to 1500ft down under the earth in the bedrock. And that stuff's been there for millions of years. So this stuff should be pretty good down there.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah, and I mean they're like in the bedrock, they're talking about 1430ft down, which for reference is 220 times deeper than the depth of an Olympic swimming pool. The spent fuel assemblies are put into steel canisters and then just to show off, Finland surrounds them with a 2 inch thick layer of copper, because copper won't corrode in the anaerobic conditions. Down 1430ft under the ground, they're putting it. Once they get to that 1430ft depth, they go into shafts that are another 30ft deep, which is 4.6 times deeper than an Olympic pool. And then they stack the canisters one on top of each other. Finally, they top off that 30 foot deep shaft and then they fill them with bentonite, which is a clever thing to add because it's compressed clay that essentially Remember those little dinosaur sponges that were really tiny, and then you drop water on them and they turn into, like, a full size Tyrannosaurus rex?

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

It's like that, but it's the clay version of that. When it makes contact with water, it expands. And as it expands, it will form a seal around the canisters. And we just have to hope that they did the math correctly. And it doesn't pop the canisters open from the surrounding pressure.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

I did not get the memo that we have abandoned Big Macs in favor of, I guess, Olympic pools. What happened? Olympic pool means nothing to me.

[Joshua D. Clark]

I just, you know, it's six and a half feet deep.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Oh, okay. You know, it means something to me, a Big Mac.

[Joshua D. Clark]

I know it does, but I don't know. Okay, I'll bring back the Big Macs.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Well, we can't pause for you to do that math.

[Joshua D. Clark]

No, no. I mean in the future.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Okay. All right.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Okay. I'll bring it back for you here or there.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

All right.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Okay.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Just a little worried. I thought maybe an email got by me.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Well, Jerry commanded, I leave the Big Macs alone. I think you were succeeded on that. Yeah. She said, it's old Josh and tired.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Oh, no.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

And you went, how about Olympic pools?

[Joshua D. Clark]

She said, I don't care, as long as it's not Big Macs.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

So that site in Finland can store 3,000 canisters, which is enough to handle Finland. They have five nuclear reactors. And they said, hey, the whole operational life of these things, and we'll get to operational life of the whole reactor site, because, you know, you can't make those go forever either. You gotta shut those things down eventually. But Finland can take care of all their business. They said 120 years or so to fill that thing completely. It'll last 100,000 years. And after 100,000 years, the idea is that it's no longer radioactively dangerous.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Right. Which is just wrong. It depends on what source you go to, and it's not clear. Like, one's from one side and one's from another side. It really depends on the source. Some people say nuclear waste is really just dangerous for the first few decades.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Right.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Other people say a thousand years. Other people say tens of thousands of years. Other people point out that an isotope of uranium, I think 236 or 8, has a half life of 4.5 billion years. So it depends on who you talk to, just how long this stuff is really toxic for. But it seems like the stuff that the people are most concerned of are things like iodine129, right. Which has a half life of 15 million years. It's not good. But then on the other hand, you have cesium 131. I think I mentioned earlier that that is really easy to get into the environment. So it causes a lot of problems. So does iodine129, but it has a half life of I think like 30 years. So as long. And a lot of the worst stuff actually goes away while it's in those pools for the first few years. So it really kind of depends on what element or isotope you're worried about, whether it's safe after however many years or not, or if it ever will be safe under anything but geological deep time, you know?

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, I wonder if they just said, I don't know, a hundred thousand years sounds like a long time. Just put that down.

[Joshua D. Clark]

You know, you get the impression on some of this that they, they are saying that because, like, no one will care. Like you would think that. I mean, this is some really studied science, so you would think there would be like figures bandied about everywhere like, oh, this is how long nuclear waste is dangerous for, you know, and, and this is why it's just all over the place. And that actually is a little bit unnerving. So I think if anything, you should err on the side of caution, which is, I think what they're doing with the geological repositories, which essentially is saying, put it as deep in the earth as we possibly can, cover it up, walk away, dusting your hands off, and pretend that it never even happened.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

You know what I bet they do is they say, how many years in the future do you think people no longer like, care about their, their future family line? Yeah, that's like 100,000 years. Yeah, that's great. Put that down.

[Joshua D. Clark]

I think it was 100 and they just multiplied it by a thousand.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

All right, so we should talk a little bit about other kinds of nuclear waste. We were talking about the high level waste. Again, the most problematic. Obviously that is just 3% though of total nuclear waste, but contributes 95% of the total radioactivity. More than 90% of nuclear waste is low level. And this is stuff that, you know, it might be like the protective clothes that you wore on site. It's got a little radioactive dust on it, maybe some tools, maybe some disposable materials. We have four locations in the US for disposing of this low level stuff. One in South Carolina, one in Washington state, one in Utah, and one in Texas and This stuff is not nearly as problematic. It decays to safe levels in about, again, who knows for sure, but about 20 to 30 years. Well, I guess in that case they can test it out at this point, but that's treated almost like a landfill. It's encased in concrete and covered with backfill.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. So, yeah, we don't really have to worry too much about low level waste, I think is the upshot of that. Right.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

There's also transuranic waste, which has incredibly long half lives. And these are often called defense wastes because they are produced when we produce plutonium for nuclear weapons. So sometimes plutonium grabs on to some of the neutrons we bombarded with and says, oh, let me form some neptunium, which has a half life of 2.14 million years.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Or how about some America? Or plutonium 239 itself has a half life of greater than 24,000 years. So this stuff is really, it's really dangerous, but at the same time, it also is really fissile, meaning it's ready to go. It's hit me with some more neutrons and let's split some more atoms so we can release some more energy. So it's not necessarily a problem if we can figure out what to do with it. It's just that we haven't quite figured out how to use it yet. So in the meantime, it gets dropped into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. And for longtime listeners of the podcast, or those curious enough to go through the back catalog, which is really great, we did an episode on nuclear semiotics. Remember that?

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Oh, yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Which is essentially trying to figure out how to communicate with people 10,000 years in the future that the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant is really dangerous. And to steer clear of it. That was probably one of my favorite all time episodes.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, for sure. And, you know, I'm glad you mentioned that. Real quick, if we could just quickly say we have many, many, many hundreds. Up to how many episodes do we have?

[Joshua D. Clark]

A couple of thousand, if you include the short stuff. It's coming up on like 2,300, I think.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. A lot of people, like, the reason we mentioned this is we get emails every single day where people like, you should do an episode on like these five things. And we've done four of the five of those. And so I think a lot of people don't realize that, you know, we've been at this for close to 18 years. And so we have a vast repository of things. And if you go to your podcast player, I know, on Apple podcasts, there's a little button you can click at the bottom that says show all episodes. Yeah. So go forth and listen. And in fact, we did have one from 2014 called Can Nuclear Fusion Reactors Save the World?

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. So that was a good one too. I love that one. That's different than this.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, that's different than this. Anyway, lots of good back catalog episodes, so we encourage you to seek them out. A little googling can go a long way as well.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. And our webmaster, Brandon Reed, has put together a world class search engine on our site, stuffyouchouknow.com so if you type in any keyword of something you're looking for, it's probably going to bring up that episode. Maybe some other episodes that we cover that in and then you can listen to it right there on the site too. So, yeah, we do have a very deep back catalog. It's almost geologic in its stretch.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

How many Olympic pools deep is it?

[Joshua D. Clark]

At least 10, 15 million, I would say.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Okay, so back to the waste isolation pilot plant in New Mexico. Here they bury this transuranic. Is that how you said it?

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Okay. Inside a salt layer that's a couple of thousand feet below the surface. And salt doesn't have any, maybe a little bit. But basically no groundwater flow and water's your enemy as far as a corrosive agent with all this stuff. But the salt is going to form a seal, just sort of like that clay did around those canisters. And that's what we do with that stuff. And I mentioned decommissioning entire nuclear power plants and reactors. That's something that you have to do because like I said, these things, you can't just keep tightening the bolts on these and expect it to keep running. I think, in fact, in the United States, 60 years is like the maximum limit before they say, shut this thing down.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. And strangely I did not realize this, but most of the contaminated stuff is low level waste, like, you know, hazard suits and stuff like that. And even the concrete that the whole power plant is made from, I saw that only about 1% of it is radioactive. The rest can just be treated as construction waste. Essentially. I saw a proposal saying, like, don't do that, like reuse this stuff as the concrete, like recycle. It is the concrete that seals in the dry casks and stuff like that. So there's actually, there seems to be much more of a push to recycle all this stuff, as we'll see. But there's a whole process to decommissioning and one of the parts of this process is making sure all those fuel assemblies spin or otherwise end up in the cooling pool. And then when it's their time to dry casks. So what's interesting is a whole power plant will be taken offline, decommissioned. It's not producing power any longer. But it still has all those fuel rods in its spent fuel pool. It still has dry casks out back. And there's still people watching over that stuff because we don't have anywhere to put it. We're literally leaving them in the spent fuel pools after we turn the power off on the nuclear power plants. That's what we're doing with our nuclear waste right now.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. And there's that water in the pools. Like, let's say you finally get all of them out of the pool and in dry cask, then you got a big pool of, I imagine, very soothing nuclear water that was used as a coolant. And you got to do something with that. And what we do with it, and I guess, you know, what's basically done with it all over the world is it's cleaned and then dumped into a waterway, an ocean or a river or a lake. And most of these plants are by a body of water for this reason. And, you know, we'll talk a little bit about how this is done, the two main processes, but I'm not like a conspiracy guy or hugely cynical, but I just don't see how that water can ever be good enough to dump into an ocean or a lake.

[Joshua D. Clark]

The only thing I've seen is dilution that full, first of all. So they filter out as much of the radionuclides as possible, Right?

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Processes for, for separating those things out from the water. But there's still some left. But the, their premise is that they're adding so much fresh water to it.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Before they dump it into the ocean. That's fine. But I think that's a very valid point. Like, we're, we're talking about nuclear science here. And this is how far behind the environmental part of nuclear science is lagging. That we're just like, it's fine, forget about it. We're just going to dump it in the ocean. And yes, it's not so bad that they're not treating it first and diluting at first, but it's still, it's like, really? That's what we can do. That's the best we can do right now. And the answer is yes.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. I mean, that's. If I don't mention the three eyed fish on the Simpsons. We're going to get emails. I guess that we have to mention that, right?

[Joshua D. Clark]

You bet.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Man, did that fish have a name?

[Joshua D. Clark]

Blinky, I think.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Oh really?

[Joshua D. Clark]

I'm pretty sure.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Didn't it blink in sequence? Yeah, like blink, blink, blink. Yeah, that's very funny.

[Joshua D. Clark]

That was a pretty cool fish.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. So that's what happens to the water. So maybe we should take our second break here and talk about a bit of a brighter future with ideas for recycling and more right after this. Support for the show today comes from public.com you're thoughtful about where your money goes. You've got core holdings, some recurring crypto buys, maybe even a few strategic options plays on the side. The point is you're engaged with your investments and Public gets that.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah, that's why they built an investing platform for those who take it seriously. On public, you can put together a multi asset portfolio for the long haul. Stocks, bonds, options, crypto. It's all there. Plus an industry leading 3.6% APY high yield cash account.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Switch to the platform built for those who take investing seriously. Go to public.comsysk and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.comsysk paid for by Public Investing. All investing involves risk of loss, including loss of principal. Brokerage services for U.S. listed registered securities options and bonds in a self directed account are offered by Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC. Crypto trading provided by Zerohash Complete disclosures [e-mail] Disclosures.

[Advertisement Voice]

Let'S be real Life happens. Kids spill, pets shed and accidents are inevitable. That's why you need a washable sofa that can keep up. Our sofas are fully machine washable inside and out so you can say goodbye to stains and hello to worry free living. Made with liquid and stain resistant fabrics, they're kid proof, pet friendly and built for everyday life. Plus changeable fabric covers let you refresh your sofa whenever you want. Need flexibility? Our modular design lets you rearrange your sofa anytime to fit your space whether it's a growing family room or a cozy apartment. Plus they're earth friendly and trusted by over 200,000 happy customers. Get early access to Black Friday pricing starting at just $699. It's time to upgrade to a stress free mess proof sofa. Visit washablesofas.com today and save that's washablesofas.com offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Run a business and not thinking about Podcasting, think again. More Americans listen to podcasts than ad supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora. And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Twice as large as the next two combined.

[Joshua D. Clark]

So whatever your customers are into true crime, sports, comedy, culture, they'll hear your message. Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio. And all this reach means everything.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Just think about the universal marketing formula.

[Joshua D. Clark]

The number of consumers who hear your message times the response rate equals the results. Now let's get those results growing for you.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Think podcasting can help your business? Think iHeart streaming radio and podcasting. Let us show you at iheartadvertising.com that's.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Iheartadvertising.Com or call 844-844-IHEART. One more time, call 844-844-iHEART and get podcasting working for you. Learn some stuff with Joshua and Charles, stuff you should know. Okay, Chuck, so I think I said that there's kind of a. A new spirit of recycling that's kind of starting to sweep the nuclear industry as far as environmental aspects are concerned. Right.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. Like you can recycle this stuff.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. Because there's a couple of things. One is we're. When a nuclear fuel rod is spent, it still has, like, like a lot of energy left in it. It's just like you said, not enough energy to power an old school nuclear reactor.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

So one solution is to develop more advanced reactors that can use those same things as fuel. They're just much more sensitive. Another thing is to take those and recycle them, like extract the usable stuff out of it, form new pellets, and just start the cycle again. And you're doing a couple of cool things here. One, you're taking out the most dangerous part of the radioactive nuclear waste and leaving behind far less dangerous waste that you still have to figure out what to do with. But it's not nearly as bad as the stuff that you took out of it. And then you're also reusing power that otherwise, under the current plans of just bury and forget it, you're burying all of that energy. There's so much energy. There's a startup called Oklo, and they, they estimate that the unused spent fuel that we're talking about just burying thousands of feet under the ground, could power the United States, the entire United States, for the next 150 years, just with the spent nuclear fuel we have right now. And the idea is to just bury and forget about it. And it's so stupid that it actually could be considered a lucky break that Yucca Mountain didn't work out back in 2010. And it's in limbo because it bought time for people to come up with other ideas rather than just bury the stuff that's just such a total waste.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. Oklo says they can recycle and reuse 94% of uranium in those spent fuel assemblies. And they're just one of 10 companies, I think they, they got a license from the, the Department of Energy to build a recycling plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Shout out to the boys.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Sure.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

And they're one of 10 companies that the Department of Energy selected as part of their reactor pilot program to build these new reactors that can be powered by recycled uranium. So that seems like a great way forward. One of the concerns here is that there is a security risk, even though that stuff is again, like you said, spent. If you can recycle it to use again even in that small quantity of unspentness, you could also make a dirty bomb or something for that. So it needs to be pretty locked down.

[Joshua D. Clark]

And the same fear, except even worse, is associated with extracting plutonium from spent nuclear fuel to, to use that because that is the core of a nuclear weapon. And that's the kind of thing that a foreign country that doesn't have a nuclear program but really wants one has the resources to steal from some startup that is refining and extracting it in their, their facility in Tennessee. That's a huge. That's actually, from what I can tell, the number one obstacle to recycling nuclear waste. That security concern.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, I mean, they could fix that though, I guess.

[Joshua D. Clark]

I mean, we keep our nuclear stockpile safe security for this long, so why can't we apply some of that same security to these recycling plants? I don't understand. It just seems like, yeah, that's a huge risk, but it's not something we can't figure out, you know.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Well, I feel like it'd probably have to be in working in concert with the government and not just saying like, all right, Oklo, you got your security security team. I see those people with the black, the black eyes. Odds on it's all good.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. So one of the other things we should say, I think that people are kind of wary about is that these startups that are talking about new ideas for nuclear power are typically doing it to get government buy in to, to help fund them to build nuclear plants to power their AI. So these are like, like I think OKLO is backed by Sam Altman from OpenAI. The essentially humanity would benefit As a side effect from new advanced designs for producing nuclear power with less waste, that'd be great. But the intent, the immediate intent by the people who are doing this is typically to produce cheaper power to power their increasingly massive artificial intelligences. That's, I think, makes some people wary, including me.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, I mean, combining those businesses is a little worrisome.

[Joshua D. Clark]

It is. And I can't let an opportunity pass to shout out if anyone builds it, Everyone Dies by Eliezer Yukowski and Nate Soares. It's so good where they just lay out a very straightforward example of how AI could just get out of control and how we humans would be in big trouble. And yet it's not like they're AI haters. They're just basically saying like, we're going at this at such a terrible pace so recklessly that we need to put the brakes on globally and figure out how to do it safely and then do it and then humanity can benefit from it. So they're not like Luddites or anything like that. And they know what they're talking about. It's just a good book.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, well, you know, with things, how things are going these days, I could use a little pick me up. So maybe a little light reading. Maybe I'll start that again.

[Joshua D. Clark]

It is like you could read it in a day, man.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

A very depressing day.

[Joshua D. Clark]

It's good though. It's really interesting too because it's also a peek inside the current state of the AI industry too. Like they're insiders, they know what's going on.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

All right, so I mentioned earlier these deep geological repositories. They've almost finished in Finland. Those aren't the best idea because who knows what's going to happen long term here on planet Earth. But they're, you know, extracting the most highly radioactive parts of this waste from everything else. Seems like that's headed toward like a pretty, a pretty good solution. So they don't know quite what to do with it afterward. But one way of doing it is something called transmutation. Right.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. I thought this was kind of genius. So essentially it's taking the extracted most radioactive parts of nuclear waste and tossing it into a particle accelerator and bombarding it with neutrons.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

And by doing so you actually either you either change them. A neutron knocks some proton or some something off of one of these, off of each of these atoms and converts it into something far less radioactive that might decay much more quickly, or they grab onto a neutron and. And they transform in that way and become something that Might be much more stable. That isn't radioactive at all. And so you're taking the really radioactive stuff and you're degrading it really quickly in a particle accelerator. And if you do it correctly, I guess in principle, I think all of this is theoretical right now. Yeah, you could actually produce energy while you're doing this. While you're getting rid of waste, you could be producing energy from the bombardment. Bombardment.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

I love this thought process. Another one that holds a lot of promise is actually glass and ceramics. Glass and ceramics can both trap those radionuclides that you were talking about and for a long period of time. And the idea is that you store this stuff in these glass logs or ceramic logs. Basically. Glass doesn't degrade very easily, Forms a very tight bond that's kind of like a force field that says nothing's getting in or getting out. It's a process called vitrification. But it's not just regular old glass. It's like, you know, sort of heavy duty nuclear containing glass.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah. And what's cool about it is the glass logs don't act as, like, container that you put waste in. You melt the glass, making minerals and the waste together, and it forms a glass log together. So, like, you're actually trapping the radioactive particles in glass, not inside glass as part of glass. It's really genius.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah. Yeah. I thought that was clear, but yeah. Thanks for clearing that up.

[Joshua D. Clark]

You're welcome. And you can also do the same thing with ceramics, too, apparently.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, ceramics work just as good. We can also recycle the thistle material. We're trying to, you know, the goal there is to recover uranium and plutonium, the main materials, main fissile materials. And again, separating out the most radioactive parts of the waste product is. What you're doing is you're trying just to make it all less bad, less radioactive, for sure.

[Joshua D. Clark]

And then hopefully doing something with it like turning it back into pellets like I saw to make a mixed uranium, plutonium oxide mox fuel. You can use eight old pellets to create one new one. So it actually is pretty efficient. And you can keep doing that over and over again until essentially you just don't have enough left to actually produce any energy. And one of the other points that I saw, Chuck, is that even if we can't figure out how to reuse the fuel that we've isolated and extracted from the spent nuclear fuel waste, Just being able to do that would reduce it by so much that it would take a huge amount of our problem for figuring out what to do with the waste off of the table. So, like, if that stuff is 1% of all nuclear waste and the United States has 90,000 tons of it, that would drop it down to just 900 tons of really problematic stuff that we had to figure out how to get rid of, not 90,000. So there's, I mean, aside from that security risk thing, there's really no reason not to process nuclear waste to get the high energy stuff out of there for one reason or another.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yeah, for sure.

[Joshua D. Clark]

I think that's it, man. Yeah.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Go forth and recycle your uranium pellets in your home.

[Joshua D. Clark]

That's right, Chuck. And since Chuck talked about recycling uranium pellets, obviously it's time for listener mail.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

This is from Kelly Gizmondi. Hey guys, I'm a lawyer in Louisiana. Started listening to Stuff youf Should Know a few years ago and currently working my way through the backlog and enjoying every minute. Just got done listening to your solitary confinement episode and was thrilled to hear you talk about the Angola 3. I have represented folks from Angola and one of the most interesting stories from Angola that was recently published by Calvin Duncan, who is wrongly wrongfully convicted, by the way. It's called the Jailhouse Lawyer, which is a deep dive into what life is like for inmate counsel, Inmate Counselor, a group of incarcerated folks who learn and then teach others the law, draft motions and legal filings for others who are incarcerated and help advocate for those incarcerated as a whole. This is an essential service for the incarcerated community because there is no right to free counsel for post conviction relief and many people who have been convicted of crimes cannot afford legal fees for post conviction relief. Essentially, if you are poor and have been wrongfully convicted of a crime or if there's another legal issue with your conviction, often the only way to get legal help is to work with inmate counsel. They're incredibly effective and have helped get thousands of incarcerated folks across Louisiana home to their communities. Would love to hear an episode on this. Thanks for all you do. For my brain, that is sincerely from Kelly Gizmondi. And Kelly, that may be a good short stuff. There's not a ton out there, but I bet you we could find 15 minutes easy.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Yeah, let's do it, man. Because that is definitely, as far as I'm concerned, an overlooked issue in the justice system for sure.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Yep.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Well, God bless you, Kelly, for what you're doing, your work, helping people who may have gotten screwed over by the city system. And if you want to be like Kelly and email us to let us know what you're doing to help your fellow person. We want to hear about that. You can send it to stuff podcastheartradio.com.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Stuff you should know is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts My Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcasts are wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Living with a rare autoimmune condition comes with challenges but also incredible strength. Especially for those living with conditions like myasthenia gravis or mg, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, otherwise known as cidp, finding empowerment in the community is critical. Untold Stories Life with a Severe Autoimmune Condition, a Ruby Studio production in partnership with Argenics explores people discovering strength in the most unexpected places. Listen to untold Stories on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. And now Superhuman Shack I keep telling.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Them not to say that. I'm no superhuman. Believe it or not, I struggle with moderate obstructive sleep apnea, or osa, in adults with obesity. Moderate to severe OSA is a condition where breathing is interrupted during sleep, with loud snoring, choking, gasping for air, and even daytime fatigue. Let's just say it could sound a lot like this. Sound familiar? Learn more@don'tsleeponosa.com this information is provided by.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Lilly, A medicine company.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Hey, this is Sarah.

[Joshua D. Clark]

Look, I'm standing out front of a.m. p.m. Right now and, well, you're sweet and all, but I found something more fulfilling, even kind of cheesy. But I like it. Sure, you met some of my dietary needs, but they've just got it all. So farewell. Oatmeal. So long, you strange soggy.

[Charles W. (Chuck) Bryant]

Break up with bland breakfast and taste AM PM's bacon, egg and cheese biscuit made with K tree egg, smoked bacon and melty cheese on a buttery biscuit. AMPM Too much good stuff. This is an iheart podcast.