
Loading summary
Podcast Host
In this Lessons episode, explore how hidden motives shape behavior more than most realize. Discover why subconscious biases block accurate self assessment. Understand how patterns in laughter, conversation and politics reveal deeper truths. And uncover how exposing these forces challenges assumptions and reshapes views on human motives.
Interviewer
So under understanding that, understanding that we are wrong a lot in the actions that we take or the presumptions that we internalize, how is it even possible.
Author/Expert
To.
Interviewer
Model different outputs or different ideas? If the test group is flawed, how do we ever predict anything? How do we ever improve anything?
Author/Expert
Well, so you're designed not to see your real motives. You're designed to see the motives you want to say. So if you just try to look at yourself and try to see your real motives, that's not going to go very well. Your subconscious is ready to divert you from that. What you'll have more successful doing is looking at just humans in general, looking at their average behavior and trying to come up with average, typical motives to explain average, typical behavior. Your subconscious mind is not very well set up to defend against that. It doesn't care so much against that as long as it's not directed at you. So what we do in our book is to go through 10 different areas of life and in each area we say what's the usual stated motive? And then what are a bunch of things that don't make sense, that don't fit very well with that story, and then offer an alternative motive that fits better with a bunch of the puzzles that we describe. And that's our method of analysis to say, here's a motive that makes more sense of these various puzzles. And most of these puzzles might not even be things you, you have noticed or if you noticed, thought were very interesting or important. And so usually they didn't interfere with your usual story about what's your motive foot. Now, after hearing about this podcast or reading our book, you will be more in a tougher situation pretending to have views of a motive. So we'll have to warn you right up front, we're going to interfere with your ability to pretend to have the usual motives. So that might put you at a disadvantage in the usual evolutionary faking it games because usually your subconscious mind just does a great job of pretending to have a certain motive and getting away with making you think that's plausible because you haven't noticed these contradictions. So sorry about that.
Interviewer
No, no, no, no.
Author/Expert
Well, I mean, serious, I'm not. I know. The question is, why read our book? Why learn this stuff? It might not be in your interest in other stuff. So. So we do think, say social scientists and policymakers have more of an interest and perhaps even an obligation to learn this stuff. But ordinary people may not really want to know. It might not be in their interest.
Interviewer
To know what would, what would. So let's, let's again, let's bring it down to two layman's terms when you start to understand. So the 10 areas that you cover, body language, laughter, conversation, consumption, our charity, education, medicine, religion, politics. Those are the 10 areas that you touch on in the book. Correct. Just want to make sure that we're.
Author/Expert
Yes, those are them. And we could have done another 10 or 20 areas it heavily. I had a longer book, but these are the ones we chose. We think this is enough to make the point clear. There's a lot of hidden motives in.
Interviewer
Your life, so walk me through when somebody does understand something like that. Let's pick an example, Whatever one is top of mind for you. What would be brought to light when somebody understands hidden motives in any of these topics? Perhaps politics is too easy for most people. I don't know if they end.
Author/Expert
They start early in the list. So things later in the list are some often harder to swallow because people are more passionate about them. But let's start right out with a laughter. Okay, one of the earliest chapters. So you laugh, other people laugh, we all laugh a lot. And if you ask why do people laugh? What are we laughing? You might say, because it was funny. If you think about it, it's not much of an explanation. And you might say, well, that's what I say. You look at the literature and say, well, what are the theories people have? And they say, well, it's incongruous or it was sort of a benign violation or other sorts of things like that. And these work a little bit, but not that well. And so the first order of business is to collect these puzzles. What are the sort of features and data points that we know about laughter, especially ones that are puzzling? Well, one thing that's puzzling is that speakers laugh more than listeners and people laugh a lot more when it's social than when it's asocial. Enormous range of times more. And we laugh about a lot of things that would be actually pretty embarrassing to say straight out loud without laughing. So for example, we might laugh at the joke don't drop the soap in the prison shower. Ahaha. Now if you think about it, it's literally laughing at prison rape, which in most people's conscious mind isn't the sort of thing you should be making a lot of fun of because it's a terribly serious, sad thing. So why would we laugh at that joke? Our standard theory that we're just taking from the literature is that laughter is a play signal. You do many things for real, and then you also do things in play. So children and play in small animals will play fight, play, run, play, chase, play, climb. And in those play modes, they don't quite do the real thing. They don't have the claws out, for example, but they'll try to go to emotions in order to practice what they would need to do there for real. Humans are very social, so we do a lot of play. A lot of our play is social. And since we have these norms and they're very important, a lot of our play centers around violating norms or not violating norms or enforcing them or not. So laughter among humans is often about doing something that would seem to violate a norm, but doesn't really hurt us. And so the key thing is that when we're playing, the thing that can go wrong is that somebody actually gets hurt. So even when small animals are play fighting, one of them might actually get bit, one of them might start bleeding, and at that moment, they need to stop playing. So playing animals and humans all need to be watching out for whether anybody's really getting hurt and checking to see whether we're still playing. And so they need a way to say, oop, stop or not playing, or also a way to say, we're fine, let's keep playing. And laughter is basically, we're still playing signal. You are doing something that looks like it might hurt, but it doesn't hurt. And you're saying it doesn't hurt. And so similarly, in the prison shower joke, you and the other person are not in prison. You're not in the prison shower. You don't know anybody in prison. It doesn't have threatened you personally. You feel safe. So even though you're acting like you're violating this norm, you're not actually getting hurt. And nobody around you expects to get hurt. Nobody expects to get called on for this violation of a norm. And so you're safe. And so we're doing this all the time with laughter. We are playing, violating norms, going up to the edge of things and checking that we all feel safe, we're okay. And it feels very good because it bonds you to people. You realize, well, they could call me on this and they could, you know, rat me out and report me for this violation, but they won't because they're my associates. And we're all having good fun here.
Interviewer
See, I was, I was just reading the point that you mentioned as well about also in line with laughter, you mentioned that babies laugh more with their mothers. How does that. And I'm just curious as to why you indicated that piece in particular.
Author/Expert
Well, I was probably just lifting a lot of little correlate that we know of.
Interviewer
Wow.
Author/Expert
I mean, but the key point there is, you know, it's a signal of feeling comfortable. And so you do it with people you are comfortable with. And so, for example, people often say, I fell in love with him or her because we laughed or he or she made me laugh. Right. What is that saying? It's saying you're involved with somebody who you are comfortable with. Right. Who, who you can violate norms, who, you can break rules or pretend to break rules and they will be okay with that and they will protect you and they will not, you know, you could do play fighting with them and they won't really hurt you.
Interviewer
Now, now the, when you, when you engage with that and you start to laugh, does it mean that you're coming from a place of feeling uncomfortable and then the laugh brings, that brings you together or, or allows you to feel psychologically safe?
Author/Expert
It has to be a plausible violation that might hurt you. Right. It's. It' have to have a bit of a tooth. So, you know, you can see this from stand up comics or something. If they, if their jokes were all about cereal boxes or putting on socks, it wouldn't have much of an edge, they call it. And so it wouldn't be as funny. Right. So they have to go to an edge where there seems to be some risk of somebody getting hurt.
Interviewer
Yeah.
Author/Expert
Otherwise it's not edgy and then it's not funny. It's funny. It's reassuringly funny. When you go to that edge and then you say, aha, I'm still safe. I mean, of course, it's like even being on an amusement park ride. Right. You go on a roller coaster or something else like that. What's the fun? It's because it feels dangerous but you're not hurt. If you actually got hurt on the roller coaster, well, that wouldn't be funny anymore. No, not fun, right? No, but if you just sat in a park bench, that's not fun either. You have to go up to the edge of danger, but not go past the edge of danger and then it's fun. Similarly, for humor and enjoying comic, we have to go to the edge of seeing that we in fact could have been hurt and See that we aren't. And then we are knowing that the other person have our back, that they're protecting us, we are safe with them because they could have hurt us.
Interviewer
I'm also curious about your point on conversation, and I don't mean to just go through the entire list.
Author/Expert
I can, I've got time.
Interviewer
But I was reading a segment on the piece of conversation about how conversation does not usually involve the exchange of useful information. Right. It's more meant to show off our mental ability, which I thought was interesting. You see, now we're laughing because it's uncomfortable, or maybe it is comfortable. We're trying to make it comfortable, but it's, it's an awkward topic. It's not a fun thing to think of.
Author/Expert
We are now vulnerable because this topic is applicable to what we're doing right now. And so we're now vulnerable to the accusation that we are showing off right now, which is a, no, no, you're not supposed to show off. And so we laugh because we are somewhat confident that we each won't actually attack the other person on this ground.
Interviewer
Yeah.
Author/Expert
We feel safe enough there, but we feel enough at risk so as to make it funny.
Interviewer
I like that. Now, now, now. LAUGHTER I can, I can see how that could be an eye opener for someone, but I don't think that's going to, you know, change their entire world. Whereas conversation. Conversation is something we do every single day.
Author/Expert
Right.
Interviewer
You laugh with someone. Yeah.
Author/Expert
So the structure of our book is first, the first third, we try to make it plausible that people could have hidden motives. And we actually have some examples with animals and other things with humans. And we just try to make it really plausible that in general people could not know about their motives. And then we have some relatively easy softball chapters where we have descriptions of hidden motives that people will mostly be able to. Body language, laughter and things like that. And then we sort of move up the scale. The things that people will get more upset about and be more resistant to concluding that their motives aren't what they think they are. And by that time, hopefully we've convinced you. Look, there's a lot of hidden motives. It's plausible there could be a motive here that might not be enough to convince you that there is in fact one, but means it's not crazy. And so that's sort of the structure here is to first tell you it's not crazy to have hidden motives. It's not crazy to believe people do not know why they do things. And we can go through some of those other examples if you want, and then we're moving to things of our center. So out of these 10 chapters, most people will have like an area that's more sacred for them and they will be resistant to believing hidden motives in their sacred area. But in the other areas they'll be fine with that. So for example, if you're really into art, you'll find it hard to accept our story on art. If you're not a dart or you're a stem grad or something, you'll find it quite easily to accept that those artists have hidden motives because that's not you. They worry for religion or politics. You know, if that's central to your life, you will find it harder to buy our story.
Podcast Host
Thanks for tuning in. If you found this valuable, don't forget to hit that subscribe button so you never miss an episode. And if you want to dive deeper into this conversation, check out the links in the description to watch the full episode. See you in the next one.
Podcast: Success Story with Scott D. Clary
Guest: Robin Hanson (Economics Professor & Co-Author of The Elephant in the Brain)
Air Date: September 23, 2025
This episode focuses on the idea that people are often unaware of their true motives. Robin Hanson, drawing from his book The Elephant in the Brain, explores how our subconscious hides our real intentions—not just from others, but from ourselves. The conversation delves into everyday behaviors (like laughter and conversation), explaining how deeper, often uncomfortable, truths lurk beneath what we believe and say about our actions.
"You're designed not to see your real motives. You're designed to see the motives you want to say... If you just try to look at yourself and try to see your real motives, that's not going to go very well."
— Robin Hanson [00:54]
"We're going to interfere with your ability to pretend to have the usual motives... That might put you at a disadvantage in the usual evolutionary faking it games."
— Robin Hanson [01:48]
"Laughter is basically, we're still playing signal. You are doing something that looks like it might hurt, but it doesn't hurt. And you're saying it doesn't hurt."
— Robin Hanson [06:41]
"It's a signal of feeling comfortable. And so you do it with people you are comfortable with... you can violate norms... and they will be okay with that and they will protect you."
— Robin Hanson [08:14]
"We are now vulnerable because this topic is applicable to what we're doing right now... we laugh because we are somewhat confident that we each won't actually attack the other person on this ground."
— Robin Hanson [10:57]
"Most people will have like an area that's more sacred for them and they will be resistant to believing hidden motives in their sacred area. But in the other areas they'll be fine with that."
— Robin Hanson [12:41]
On why self-assessment fails:
"Your subconscious is ready to divert you from that." — Robin Hanson [01:02]
On the risks of learning about hidden motives:
"It might not be in your interest... Ordinary people may not really want to know." — Robin Hanson [02:55]
On the emotional danger of humor:
"If you actually got hurt on the roller coaster, well, that wouldn't be funny anymore... but if you just sat in a park bench, that's not fun either. You have to go up to the edge of danger, but not go past the edge of danger and then it's fun." — Robin Hanson [09:38]
Throughout, Robin Hanson blends academic insight with real-world examples and a tone that is both candid and slightly provocative—challenging listeners to confront uncomfortable truths about themselves and society. The conversation is thoughtful, occasionally playful, and grounded in evidence, with a willingness to admit when conclusions are inconvenient or unsettling.
For further exploration:
This summary captures the core arguments, but the full episode provides a richer, more nuanced understanding—especially if you're interested in how hidden motives operate in specific domains like charity, politics, and education. The episode is recommended for anyone curious about the psychology of self-deception and social behavior.