
Hosted by SCOTUS Opinions · EN

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel. In this case, the court considered this issue: Do district courts have the authority to excuse the thirty-day procedural time limit for removal in 28 USC § 1446(b)(1)?The case was decided on April 22, 2026.The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Hencely v. Fluor Corp.In this case, the court considered this issue: Does Boyle v. United Technologies Corporation, which immunized government contractors from liability under certain circumstances, extend to preempt state tort claims against a government contractor for conduct that breached its contract and violated military orders?The case was decided on April 22, 2026.The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in District of Columbia v. R-WThe central issue in District of Columbia v. R-W was whether the Fourth Amendment’s "totality of the circumstances" standard allows a court to ignore specific suspicious factors, such as the unprovoked flight of a driver's companions, when determining if an officer had reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop.The case was decided on April 20, 2026. The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Cox Communications, Inc. v Sony Music Entertainment. In this case, the court considered this issue: Can an internet service provider be held liable, and found to have acted willfully, for copyright infringement just because it knew users were infringing and did not terminate their access?The case was decided on March 25, 2026.The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.