
SolaMed Solutions provides aerospace medical expertise with innovative solutions to elevate human performance in space exploration.
Loading summary
A
You're listening to the N2K space network.
B
Ever wished you could rebuild your network from scratch to make it more secure, scalable and simple? Meet Meter, the company reimagining enterprise networking from the ground up. Meter builds full stack zero trust networks including hardware, firmware and software, all designed to work seamlessly together. The result? Fast, reliable and secure connectivity without the constant patching, vendor juggling, or hidden costs. From wired and wireless to routing, switching, firewalls, DNS security and vpn, every layer is integrated and continuously protected in one unified platform. And since it's delivered as one predictable monthly service, you skip the heavy capital costs and endless upgrade cycles. Meter even buys back your old infrastructure to make switching effortless, transform complexity into simplicity, and give your team time to focus on what really matters, helping your business and customers thrive. Learn more and book your demo@meter.com cyberwire that's M E T E R.com cyberwire.
A
Since human spaceflight started in the 1960s, space agencies around the globe have adhered to soft rules for exploration. The UN Outer Space Treaty, the ISS Intergovernmental Agreement, and more recently, the Artemis Accords have laid out how we as humanity collectively approach space travel. But as more capabilities arise, who is thinking about what comes next? Well, there's a company thinking through space strategy, policy analysis, community and corporate engagement that thinks that they can provide a solution. This is t minus deep space maria I'm maria varmazes. Recently we've held a series of chats with solamed solutions about their organization and what they hope to bring to commercial companies who are exploring the future of human space travel. Today's chat is with Charles Dorn, chief operating officer at SoloMed, who shares insights from his experience with NASA to how he is approaching the problems that need to be solved with ethics for the future of space travel.
C
My name is Chuck Dorn. I'm an emeritus professor at the University of Cincinnati and the chief operating officer of SOLOMED. When I was maybe 10 or 11 years old, my parents took us to the Kennedy space Center in 1968 and we took a bus out to the vehicle assembly building where they were assembling the Saturn V rockets and took us to the moon. And we were able to get out of the bus and walk around and you could I actually looked up at the rocket that was taking the Apollo 11 astronauts to the moon.
B
Oh.
C
So I thought it would really be cool to work at NASA. And then all through high school and college I wanted to go to medical school. But I found out very quickly that you Couldn't do that with Cs in chemistry and physics. So here I am now as an emeritus professor in the College of Medicine and having worked with NASA for 33 years. And I, I always find myself in a unique position of being in working with physicians, both MDs and doctors of osteopathic medicine, learning about medicine and spaceflight, specifically space medicine, but being in a room sort of where it happened. So being the kind of person to who somebody would say, you know, I need to get you. You need to get this done.
B
And.
C
And I would go off and do it. And I always sort of. Somebody once said, you know, you're like Radar O'Reilly from MASH. You know, the person would say, boy, I wish I had a sink here to wash my hands. And the next day there's a sink. Yep, right. So. So that kind of thing. I've had the opportunity to write a number of textbooks, almost 10 now, almost 500 manuscripts, book chapters. And so really been been at this for a long time. And with respect to my time at NASA, started in 1990 and wrote all kinds of documents. The strategic plan for telemedicine. The editor in chief of the Telemedicine Guild Journal have traveled to 37 countries. So really had been around the world on the ground or in airplanes, not in space. So that's sort of a very quick background from how I got to where I am.
A
Yeah, thank you so much for that great introduction and telling me the taster of your story. I'm sure just scraping the surface on that one. We are in such a fascinating time for space exploration, but specifically space medicine. It has to have been just so fascinating from your point of view just to see where we are now. Just thinking back from where your career started, compare and contrast of what the kind of developments that we've been seeing and where we are today.
C
Well, I think the most important part of healthcare today, in my opinion, to be able to see a patient where the physician and patient are not in the same place. And so if I think of Thomas Friedman's book. Thanks for being late. In 2007, the most important invention was mobile phone, smart smartphone. And with that ushers in an environment where you have things like YouTube videos. You have the ability to do what we're doing right now, where we're doing a video conference. You have things like where you can order your food delivered to your house, or you can go online and find a date, or you can go and search Google to look at the best restaurant or where to park. So all these Things really occurred in the last 30 years or so, 25 to 30 years. So here we are at the end of the first quarter of the 21st century and we have the ability to reach out and talk to one another remotely. Now NASA's been monitoring its astronauts since the early 60s on the very first flight. And in fact, the Soviet Union, when they launched Sputnik 2, had Laika, which was a dog, went into space and they were able to monitor her from space remotely. And so the idea of being able to reach out and have technology to do that now, 60 or 70 years ago today we can actually do that. And you can be anywhere in the world and talk to somebody. You can literally talk to somebody in the jungle on the top of Mount Everest, on, on the, on the moon. Although there was, there's a time delay and of course on the way to Mars, it's even further delay of communication. So things like avatars, computer generated images, the ability for AI. I mean, AI has been around for a long time. Think of laparoscopic surgery developed in the 1920s, but the hole in which to get the instruments in was the size of a softball. So that's open surgery because the camera was, you know, very large.
A
Yes.
C
And so now you can go through the belly button and do surgery. So this technology really enables us to do things and understand life's processes better. That will help us get to, we hope, a human exploration of Mars and beyond.
A
I, I'm very curious as, as we look towards the future, especially about what enabling technologies have you maybe most encouraged or are most exciting to you? I mean, as you were mentioning about all this, the monitoring that we've been able to do, we're also, I mean, we're going, we, we have better monitoring abilities now, but also the ability to better interact and potentially perform remote medical procedures. I'm just curious what your thoughts are about that.
C
When I was working with NASA, I was on detail as what's called an IPA. Back in fact for almost, almost 25 years or so, spending 33 years actually with the agency we did here at the University of Cincinnati, since I was on loan from the university to NASA headquarters. We did a series of experiments with the da Vinci robot and with the Zeus robot. These were two competing robotic systems. And we did a program called neemo, NASA Extreme Mission Operations. And I heard many people in the military and many people within NASA saying we're never going to do surgery in space. So if we assume for a minute that we will one day send human beings to live and stay On Mars or perhaps on the Moon, there's going to have to be things like surgical intervention. There's going to have to be the ability to do procedures to perhaps deliver a baby or that's even if you can certainly conceive. But the question is whether you can actually carry a baby to term and then deliver a baby in an absence of gravity or different gravitational pull. So these things allow us then to explore the capabilities of living and working and living in a distant place. Right? So we know that during the age of discovery, in the 15th and 16th century, that people got on boats and they disappeared into the ocean. They just sailed away from England or Portugal or China or wherever it was, and they explored the Earth, all right? And they could stop along an island, get fresh water, maybe get some fresh vegetables or find some animals or whatever. But on a space exploration initiative, you have to take everything with you, which means we have to develop newer, more robust technologies that have limited human interaction. So is it possible to have a robot like they have on the International Space Station to help us do things? We certainly see AI now where you can talk to or even have a relationship with a robot, which in some ways is creepy, but it's possible. And so that's today. So if we think about jumping into the future, say 20, 20, 40, 2050, when, you know, I'll be like 100 years old almost, I don't know that we'll be on Mars, but if we are, there are many, many different issues that we have to address between now and then. And those individuals doing that research are like six or seven years old.
A
Yes, I was going to say that is a burning question I have in my mind about what that gap is that we. I'm sure it would take us hours to address that. But top of mind for you, what are some of those gaps that we need to figure out between now and the day that we're on Mars?
C
Here at the University of Cincinnati, I'm a, the director of the Armstrong Institute, Space Institute. And a lot of people believe when you, when you talk about space exploration, they immediately go, it's an engineering construct. And that's true. There are engineering issues. Right, so how can we get to Mars faster? Right now it's going to take six, seven, eight months, depending on the propulsion systems. And then from a human perspective, what are we going to do as individuals? I mean, how do you have five people in basically a fancy Airstream trailer or Winnebago, you know, motorhome, or maybe two or three Greyhound bus, you know, something that size and you're in there for, for the duration, right. Until you get there. So how do we address medical care? How do we develop better processes for making pharmaceuticals in our microgravity environment? How do we grow food? How do we address the ethics behind space? And we're going to talk about ethics in a minute. With regard to soled, you have a huge opportunity for technology to completely change the way we live and work on the earth. And we see that now with things like AI taking jobs away, but creating new jobs. And so I think some of the technologies that we need don't exist today. You're certainly not going to be able to palpate someone's abdomen without new technology. In fact, like I said, it's got to be 20 years or so ago, I saw a glove with all these like wires coming out and on the, on the hand part were suction cups and the suction cups would go on the abdomen on the glove and when you push down on the abdomen and the person in Washington D.C. could feel the patient's abdomen in California.
A
Hmm.
C
So, so, but that was 20 years ago. Right. And so we have things like avatars that allow us to interact. We have the ability to grow organs now of some with someone's T cells. So a lot of these things are, are not, they're still experimental, they're not ready for prime time as it were. But, but I think you'll see that many of these technologies will lead to new technologies which would then lead to new industries and new opportunities for ground based research, ground based manufacturing. But eventually there'll be long term, long duration space exploration initiatives where they'll be maybe measured in hundreds of thousands of people.
A
That will be a fascinating day. I hope to see it one day. You mentioned I wanted you put a pin in ethics and solamed and I wanted to get back to that. What were you going to say about that?
C
So solomed is going to have a series of roundtables and there's a series of questions that will be ask of a core bioethicist. And those core bioethicists may or may not have a background in space exploration or space issues, but they're ethicists. Right. So if you think about things like, well, who should fly, right. If you go to an amusement park and you get on a, like, like I live in Cincinnati. So we have Kings island which is just north of here and they have a famous roller coaster called the Beast. There's one in King's Dominion. You obviously have Space Mountain down in Disney and So forth. So these roller coasters, do these fast rides, say if you're pregnant, you have high blood pressure, you have a bad back, you're overweight, don't ride this ride. Right. You ride at your own risk. Well, obviously some people, they don't want to, you know, because they don't want to die. And so the question with space exploration is, should we say to you as a female who's going to go to Mars for three years, you must be on birth control so you can't get pregnant? Yeah, we have to take your gallbladder out, we have to take your appendix out. What are the ethics? What if you're, you're certain religions, you require certain rituals before burial? What do you do with a deceased crew member who should fly, who shouldn't fly. So these are ethical questions about how do we address commercial spaceflight? So company A and company B and company C may not follow the same set of guidelines or they may interpret them in a different way. NASA. If you fly the International Space Station, you must follow the International Space Station protocols developed by the Multilateral Medical Operations Panel and the Multilateral Space Medicine Board. If you fly on Delta Airlines or American Airlines, those pilots also must meet certain criteria to be a pilot. But the people in the back do not. Right. We don't say to somebody, oh, you know, you're schizophrenic, so we, we're going to allow you to fly in first class and freak out. Well, you don't know that, that somebody's going to do that. But you won't. You wouldn't want that person to be on a spacecraft with five other people and freak out.
A
Yeah. Right.
C
So, so ethics is do commercial companies now do an analysis and do they evaluate people People for that?
A
We'll be right back after this quick break.
B
Most environments trust far more than they should and attackers know it. Threat Locker solves that by enforcing default deny at the point of execution. With ThreatLocker allowlisting, you stop unknown executables cold. With ring fencing, you control how trusted applications behave. And with ThreatLocker DAC defense against configurations, you get real assurance that your environment is free of misconfigurations and clear visibility into whether you meet compliance standards. ThreatLocker is the simplest way to enforce zero trust principles without the operational pain. Its powerful protection that gives CISOs real visibility, real control and real peace of mind. ThreatLocker makes zero trust attainable even for small security teams. See why thousands of organizations choose ThreatLocker to minimize alert fatigue, stop ransomware at the source and regain control over their environments. Schedule your demo@threatlocker.com n2k today foreign.
C
This is pro linebacker TJ Watt and I'm back with YPB by Abercrombie for another activewear drop. My second co design collection has new shorts and tanks that keep up with all my in season workouts. And their new restore collection is a game changer off the field too because even pro athletes like me need rest days. Shop YPB by Abercrombie in the app online and in stores because your personal best is greater than anything.
A
What a fascinating question and I imagine for many people the assumption would be they would maybe follow NASA's lead and just sort of follow conventions that were there. But yeah, you wanted to add something to that?
C
Well no, I mean I think that the, the NASA has its guidelines now forward facing so they're not internal. And those guidelines by the way were developed in part beginning of the space shuttle program. So up until 1977 most of the guidelines and requirements were sort of had been developed and modified a little bit by, by the, by astronauts program, by the Air Force coming out of the 1950s. And so NASA didn't really develop its own set of standards until 1977 with the creation of a medical policy board standards for picking payload specialists and mission specialists for the space shuttle program and those carried over obviously into the current ISS program. But remember, the ISS program is really the very first. Aside from fighting a war either on terror or World War II, you find that the international consortium of the International Space Station then led us to the Artemis Accords which really looks at how do we protect the people in space, how do we protect space itself? I mean going again to ethics. Do we leave a, do we have a cemetery on Mars? Do we leave human bodies on Mars? And if we have a, we don't want to call them a colony, but a settlement, if we have a settlement where, where human beings are living on Mars, do we have a cemetery? Do we have a crematorium? And I ask one somebody once why some societies are, are better off than others. And it's like well, if you think about the development of the United States as a nation, the question was why, why is America, the United States specifically higher standard of living than others is because the person answer goes the British brought their wives, which sounds somewhat kind of corny, but if you think about that, if you think of a family coming, you want to live in a community where there's a grocery store, there's a library, there's A movie theater, there's a fire department, police department, cemetery, a park where you can go throw a Frisbee or whatever. And so when we think about exploration and development of settlements on Mars where people are living, you have to create a sense of society, right? We've done this a little bit in the Antarctic about. No one stays in the Antarctic. No one's buried there. They bring them back because you don't want to pollute the environment. But how do you bring, you know, I mean, maybe there's a death Star or something, I don't know. I mean, where you have, you know, a floating crematorium or a floating cemetery. But the point here is, is that whatever we do is a, is a world. That's what the Artemis Accords are about. What do we do as a world to create that opportunity? Right. So when you think of solomed as an organization has three pillars, right? We have concept of operation, we have the educational thing where we're going to do things like summits and so forth. And then you have the space medicine education component, right? So you have these, these capabilities that allow us to bring forth, probably only outside of NASA, probably the largest conglomeration of individuals with experience and measured in perhaps in hundreds, if not thousands of years of experience, right. You have former flight surgeons, you have former astronauts, you have former policymakers, you have former chief medical officers. You have a lot of momentum there to work with a commercial companies because remember, the commercial companies are all separate. They're ruled by the rule is wrong with, they work with the faa, Right. So the question is, here's the question is what defines an astronaut?
A
Yeah.
C
So if you go above the Karman line, which is the, the differentiation between the blackness of space and the blueness of the atmosphere, if you pass over that now you're an astronaut, but you only up there 10 minutes, right? So these, these six women that went up in space back, you know, five, six months ago, awesome capabilities to do that. But that wasn't really research. That's like going on a fast ride, you know, you enjoyed it. I mean, you got to see the curvature of the earth, but that's not the same as, you know, Neil Armstrong going and sitting on the moon.
A
No, no, that's not right. Yeah.
C
So the question comes up is how can solamed work with companies to establish the standard criteria across all the space companies so that you follow a common set of standards and create an opportunity where, because, you know, if an accident happens, I remember this. Have you ever been to Florida, to the Kennedy Space center been to Florida.
A
But not yet to Kennedy Space Center. I've been to Cape Canaveral, but not to ksc.
C
So you see the vab, it's a big building with the big flag on it, right? So if you go there, right, as the rockets are taken out of that to the launch pad. 39A and 39B were built for the Apollo program. The 39A is, is operated now by SpaceX. And there's a high fence around it so you can't get near it. And they're very particular about who has access to it. But if something happens like a rocket blows up, NASA will be on the front page of the, you know, newspaper, not SpaceX. Yeah, it has nothing to do with NASA. Yeah, there's no NASA astronauts on there. And the question then is, who then is responsible for the mishap itself? Right. So I actually worked with NASA on creating the mishap manual, on working with the Chief Medical Officer. So you have this opportunity to create. There's a wealth of knowledge, but how do you share that knowledge? How do you create a consensus around this rather than say, well, we're going to try and do it so we can get as many people in space and make as much money as possible. That's, that's sort of a commercial. I mean, Delta Airlines is about safety. It's about experience. And you see their commercials. I say Delta all the time. That's why I'm using Delta. But United and American Lufthansa, they all are the same, is that they want you to get from point A to point B comfortably. But they'll charge you for everything. They'll charge you for baggage. And so when does the commercial space industry get to that point? But again, if you think about it, this is only 17 years old, and.
A
Yet that has transformed absolutely everything. Yeah, absolutely. It sure has. I remember life before them, and it's just wild to think how much things have changed since. Well, Chuck, you've given me a lot to think about, honestly, because I honestly never thought about, just as one example, about what do we do with bodies, with people, when inevitably people will die on other worlds. And thinking about, you know, burial on the moon, which was, as we know, extremely controversial in the news last year with human cremains potentially being sent to the moon and all of the controversy about that. So I'm so glad that people are thinking about these things. But in addition to it being a fascinating conversation, it's such a complicated, as it should be complicated, number of issues on every level.
C
There was A book written in 1949 by Wernher von Braun. And he was the one who built the stratified rocket. And he was at odds with the Eisenhower administration. Eisenhower didn't really like the fact that we had former Nazi scientists and so forth. And yet he wrote this book about a Mars colony. And that Mars colony was under the direction of one man. You know what that man's name was?
A
Oh gosh, I don't, I don't remember.
C
No, his name was Elon. So now Elon Musk, you know, I'm not know, denigrating him, but the point here is, is that you have most of the last 150 to 200 years technology has been driven by government funded activities. Yes, right. The British did a lot of research during the American Civil War with high altitude balloons. We have the Wright brothers. You know, they invented flight or they invented, they didn't invent flight, they invented the airplane with, you know, pitch, roll on, yawn would allow them to control the aircraft. And then aviation took off. But remember, aviation didn't really take off in the United States, it went to Europe. So all the speed records are set in Europe, not here. Right. Because we thought it was going to be more of a circus act or, you know, and then somebody said, you know, you can drop things from airplanes like mail or things that go boom, boom, bombs. Right. And so aviation took off. And so that took probably a good 50 years. I mean it's literally 60 years years from the Wright brothers to Neil Armstrong sitting on the moon. Both by the way, from Ohio. Right. And so we are the heart of it all. But the point here is that you have the ability to develop technology. And it's sort of like if I say, well, I don't really think I need to develop anything new. I mean, think of the light bulb also developed in Ohio with Thomas Edison. So you have these devices. It's like, how can we. I asked somebody once, you remember the PDA?
A
Oh yes, I do. I had one.
B
Right.
C
Or BlackBerry. And so I said to this one guy, I said, why can't we? Because you remember the phone used to have the antenna you pull up, right?
A
Yes.
C
I said, why can't you put the antenna back here like a circle and have the PDA and the phone on the same device? Not possible. I don't have any intellectual property on that one either.
A
I was going to say, what a missed opportunity.
C
I'm so sorry. Right.
A
Steve Jobs overheard you, I think.
C
Right. So you have the ability now to create things. And so now you see more companies and more individuals developing faster, better, cheaper. Right? This is one of the things that Dan golden said many years ago when he was the administrator of NASA is now you have the ability to launch a rocket and land the rocket back on a platform in the middle of the water. And the crew gets up, crew does whatever it does, comes back, they get out there, reuse the spacecraft. Right. It's not a one and done kind of thing. And so that's where you'll see, you know, economy of scale, where you'll see like, I mean, you don't want to take, you know, Boeing 777 from here to say Tokyo and then they destroy the plane. I mean, that would be stupid, right? And so you have the ability to reuse and refurbish. And so that in and of itself will create, you know, a wealth of opportunity. And so now when you think of, of, of movies like Star Trek or Star wars where they're, they're futuristic, the Star Trek, the more recent series of movies isn't all that far fetched. Creating, you know, platform where you can launch things from here. In this case it's in Iowa where Captain Kirk, you know, what's then Chris Pine.
A
Yep, yep.
C
He actually goes to that bar and gets recruited to go up into space. But you know, there's, it's possible you can have these space ports. All right, now the question again, looking at developing space ports all over the world is how much does that influence the environment? Right? I mean, how, how much does that affect the environment? So all the, all this knowledge that we've gained over the, this number of years are actually amalgamated in the soul event. Right. You have people like Sarah Lynn, Mark is a physician, you have a number of other. Smith Johnson has an example. I don't know who, how many people have you talked with? You've talked.
A
Oh, you are my third. Yes.
C
Who are the other two? Sarah.
A
I did talk to Sarah and Dr. Haley.
C
Oh, okay. So you have this, this group of people that have come together with extreme knowledge about, about the things that we've been talking about. But I think that the most important part, I think for people to walk away with is that space is inherently dangerous. However, it's the frontier where jobs opportunities are going to be created for those young boys and girls who are studying STEM education to provide them an opportunity. You know, a seven year old today, he or she has no idea what they want to do when they grew up. I mean, they might say I want to be an astronaut or I want to be A firefighter or policeman. We understand that. We were all there at one time. But if you can now, you know, mold those students into something career wise, then you have a huge opportunity to create new wealth. And I don't mean in dollars and cents, but the wealth of knowledge and capabilities that helps us usher in a change in the geopolitical atmosphere that we are currently living in around the world that when you look at the Earth from space, all you see is a blue dot, blue marble. You don't see the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians or between Russia and Ukraine or Democrats and Republicans. You don't see any of that stuff. Right. All you see is a changing world. And we're changing the world for sure. But how do we then go off world and create new settlements? A. Is it possible? Is it sustainable? And will it actually happen? And I think the answer is yes, yes and no. I mean, as I don't. I mean, right now, I don't think that we're going to be able to extend life beyond Earth without a huge investment collectively around the world. Not just the United States in a half a dozen. It has to be the entire world.
A
Yeah. Yep.
C
And there's so much wealth of knowledge out there that's not even tapped. And universities and academic institutions around the world, sometimes they're stuck in the old ways of doing things and they're not thinking of the future. And so when you start looking at future needs as nations and as a world, then you start being able to develop new technology, new capabilities and new opportunities for all. Foreign.
A
That's T minus deep space. Brought to you by N2K CyberWire. We'd love to know what you think of our podcast. Your feedback ensures we deliver the insights that keep you a step ahead in the rapidly changing space industry. If you like our show, please share a rating and review in your podcast app or you can send us an email to Spacentu. We're proud that N2K CyberWire is part of the daily routine of the most influential leaders and operators in the public and private sector. From the Fortune 500 to many of the world's preeminent intelligence and law enforcement agencies, N2K helps space and cybersecurity professionals grow, learn and stay informed. As the nexus for discovery and connection, we bring you the people, the technology, technology and the ideas shaping the future of secure innovation. Learn how@n2k.com N2K's senior producer is Alice Carruth. Our producer is Liz Stokes. We are mixed by Elliot Peltzman and Trey Hester with original music by Elliot Peltzman. Our executive producer is Jennifer Ivan. Peter Kilpe is our publisher and I'm T minus host Maria Varmazes. Thank you for listening. We'll see you next time.
C
Foreign.
B
If you only attend one cybersecurity conference this year, make it RSAC 2026. It's happening March 23rd through the 26th in San Francisco, bringing together the global security community for four days of expert insights, hands on learning and real innovation. I'll say this plainly, I never miss this conference. The ideas and conversations stay with me all year. Join thousands of practitioners and leaders tackling today's toughest challenges and shaping what comes next. Register today@rsaconference.com cyberwire26 I'll see you in San Francisco.
Date: January 10, 2026
Host: Maria Varmazes, N2K Networks
Guest: Charles “Chuck” Dorn, COO of SOLOMED
This episode centers on the future of space exploration with a special focus on the intersection of space medicine, technology, and ethics. Maria Varmazes interviews Charles Dorn, a veteran of NASA and current COO of SOLOMED, to discuss the technological advancements shaping human spaceflight, the inevitable ethical quandaries of settling other worlds, and SOLOMED’s efforts to provide unified standards and thought leadership for commercial space ventures.
On Telemedicine Advances:
“Here we are at the end of the first quarter of the 21st century and we have the ability to reach out and talk to one another remotely…on the top of Mount Everest, on… the moon."
— Chuck Dorn (06:57)
On Ethics in Space:
“Should we say to you as a female who's going to go to Mars for three years, you must be on birth control so you can't get pregnant? … What do you do with a deceased crew member?”
— Chuck Dorn (15:09)
On the Societal Needs of Space Settlements:
“You have to create a sense of society, right? … in the Antarctic…they bring them back because you don’t want to pollute the environment. But how do you bring, you know, I mean, maybe there’s a death star or something...”
— Chuck Dorn (20:45)
On Young Generations and the Future:
“The most important part…is that space is inherently dangerous. However, it's the frontier where job opportunities are going to be created for those young boys and girls who are studying STEM education to provide them an opportunity.”
— Chuck Dorn (30:32)
On the Global View from Space:
“When you look at the Earth from space, all you see is a blue dot, blue marble. You don't see the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians or between Russia and Ukraine or Democrats and Republicans. You don't see any of that stuff.”
— Chuck Dorn (31:08)
The conversation is thoughtful, deeply reflective, and often anecdotal, drawing on both technical expertise and philosophical considerations. Dorn speaks with a blend of humility, humor, and seasoned insight, illustrating the intersection of technical possibility and human experience.
This episode explores not just the technical hurdles but also the cultural, ethical, and policy frontiers of future space settlement. As the industry shifts toward more commercial and international collaboration, organizations like SOLOMED are working to ensure that profound questions—about health, ethics, and humanity itself—are considered with the gravity they deserve.