Loading summary
Makeup Influencer
I used to think buying foundation online was impossible. How am I supposed to find my shade when I can't even get it right in store? Then I discovered Il Maquillage. I took their AI powered quiz to find my custom match and wow. This foundation is literally my skin in a bottle. The undertone and coverage are spot on. It's so neutral and weightless I can't even tell I'm wearing makeup. Plus with Try before youe Buy, you can try your full size at home for 14 days. Take the Power Match Quiz now at ilmaquillage.com Quiz I L M A K I A G E.com Quiz It's a.
Nature Documentary Narrator
Cold day here in Alaska, but there's one animal seemingly unaffected. Bright eyed and determined enters the husky. Observe as they go up the mountain, guided by pure instinct. They are truly amazing masters of this wilderness. But even these amazing pets can't sign up for Lemonade Pet Insurance. You can sign up now@lemonade.com Amazing support.
E Trade Advertiser
For this podcast and the following message is brought to you by E Trade from Morgan Stanley. With E Trade, you can dive into the market with easy to use tools, $0 commissions and a wide range of investments. And now there's even more to love. Get access to industry leading research and insights from Morgan Stanley to help guide your decisions. Open an account and get up to $1,000 or more with a qualifying deposit. Get started today@etrade.com terms and other fees apply. Investing involves risks. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC Member SIPIC etrade is a business of Morgan Stanley.
Nature Documentary Narrator
Foreign.
Isaac Saul
Executive Producer Isaac Saul this is Tangle. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening and welcome to the Tangle Podcast. A place where you get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking, and a little bit of my take. I'm your host, Isaac Saul and this is me defending Gavin Newsom. So in case you guys somehow missed a California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, he's doing something unforgivable. He get this, hold on to your hats here. He's having conversations with people he disagrees with and worse. Worse yet, worst of all, he's not even informing them how wrong their worldviews are. Gavin Newsom recently launched a podcast called this Is Gavin Newsom. The show is advertised as a way for Newsom to sit down with a wide range of political thinkers, with a special emphasis on MAGA personalities who see politics very differently than Democrats do. So far, it's living up to its billing. Newsom has already interviewed conservative activists and Trump's Gen Z whisperer Charlie Kirk conservative commentator Michael Savage and Steve Bannon, the longtime MAGA mogul who was recently released from prison and has been fully and totally branded as a deeply evil racist hate monger. Newsom's project has rightly sparked a lot of speculation about his intentions to hop into the 2028 race, including from me on last week's Sunday podcast. I said that his podcast was basically his campaign announcement. The podcast has also birthed a never ending stream of criticism. What on earth is Gavin Newsom doing? Michelle Goldberg asked at the New York Times. Newsom tries to use right wing influencers to fix his image. Don't fall for it, des Potas wrote in USA Today. A letter to the editor in the Sacramento Bee read, governor Gavin Newsom could step up to be a better leader that California needs. Instead, he he made a podcast at the Guardian. Margaret Sullivan said, why is Gavin Newsom handing Steve Bannon a megaphone, perhaps unaware that Bannon himself has one of the most popular podcasts in the world? Others branded the podcast as cringe or said it backfired.
Wildgrain Advertiser
The conservative account Libs of TikTok called.
Isaac Saul
Newsom out for lying when he claimed he never used the term Latinx. Anti Trump Republican Adam Kinzinger said he was in shock at the stupidity of Newsom having Bannon on his show, calling it, quote, unforgivable and insane, end quote. In reaction to the podcast, Newsom's favorability among liberals cratered, dropping from 46% to 30%. The same polling showed Republicans overwhelmingly believed him to be insincere, calling him fake and pandering. The show now has an abysmal 2.8 out of 5 star rating on Apple podcasts, which is basically as bad as you can get, which honestly is a shame. I actually listened to the episodes with Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon and I have to say I quite liked them. I really did. A few things about Newsom's approach stood out to me as remarkable and novel that I feel like I should call out and defend a little bit here. First, it's incredible that these conversations are happening at all. Literally incredible. Many liberals and Democrats claim to be open minded to right wing ideas, but limit their intake of conservative media to exclusively never Trump Republicans who share a great deal of their worldview. Newsom did not launch a purportedly ideologically diverse podcast and then invite on, say, David French of the New York Times, a famous Never Trumper. He immediately brought on guests that, as the commentary above demonstrates, are considered off limits to a lot of people in left wing bubbles. Newsom's decision to sit down for a lengthy interview with someone like Kirk or Bannon is even more extraordinary given his status. He's not a journalist or an influencer. He's a politician, and a rather prominent one at that. We'll be right back after this quick break.
Wildgrain Advertiser
This episode of Tangle is brought to you by Wildgrain. Wildgrain is the first bake from frozen subscription box for artisanal breads, pastries and pastas. Wildgrain's boxes are fully customized to your.
Isaac Saul
Taste and dietary restrictions.
Wildgrain Advertiser
In addition to their classic variety box.
Isaac Saul
They recently launched a new gluten free.
Wildgrain Advertiser
Box and a plant based box that is 100% vegan. Best of all, they take the hassle.
Isaac Saul
Out of baking since all items bake.
Wildgrain Advertiser
From frozen in 25 minutes or less with no mess or cleanup. I recently got a box of Wild Grain products and included in it was their six pack of the Parmesan Herb Biscuits. These things were unbelievably delicious. They actually tasted like freshly baked bread after just throwing them in the oven for 25 minutes straight from frozen. So I can personally attest to how good some of this stuff really is.
Isaac Saul
So if you are ready to bring.
Wildgrain Advertiser
All your favorite carbs right to your doorstep, be sure to check out Wild Grain so you can begin building your own box of artisanal breads, pastas and pastries. For a limited time only, Wild Grain is offering our listeners $30 off their first box plus free croissants in every box when you go to wildgrain.comtangle to start your subscription.
Isaac Saul
You heard me.
Wildgrain Advertiser
Free croissants in every box and $30 off your first box when you go to wildgrain.comtangle that's wildgrain.comtangle and you can use promo code Tangle at checkout.
Colin Seberger
To.
Boost Mobile Advertiser
Get people excited about Boost Mobile's new nationwide 5G network. We're offering unlimited talk, text and data for $25 a month.
Isaac Saul
Forever.
Boost Mobile Advertiser
Even if you have a baby, Even if your baby has a baby, even if you grow old and wrinkly and you start repeating yourself, even if you start repeating yourself, even if you're on your deathbed and you need to make one last call or text, right? Or text the long lost son you abandoned at birth, you'll still get unlimited talk, text and Data for just $25 a month. With Boost Mobile, after 30 gigabytes, customers may experience slower speeds. Customers will pay 25amonth as long as they remain active on the Boost Unlimited plan forever.
Isaac Saul
The second thing that was remarkable is that both the discussions I listened to were cordial. Despite the radical differences in worldview between host and guest, neither devolved into shouting matches or ad hominem attacks, and Newsom even managed to laugh off a few barbs from Kirk and Bannon that were clearly bait to send the conversation off the rails. Third, and perhaps most impressive, Newsom didn't use the interviews to defend his record, preach his own views, or try to prove his guests wrong. He spent almost the entirety of both interviews asking questions that is actually trying to better understand the perspective of the guests. Bannon, who I happen to think is a lying, dishonorable political cretin, said a lot of things I actually agree with and conducted himself with a good deal of candor and grace. I learned more about his worldview, and while I still loathe much of what he's done to degrade our politics, not to mention screw over Trump supporters, I left better understanding how and why he believes what he believes. Newsom got him to act like a normal human being and also gave him space to state his opinions clearly. I simply cannot overemphasize how refreshing that is. Sadly, I can't understate how unsurprising it was to see it get pilloried by the left. Michelle Goldberg said she was, quote, open to the idea of Newsom's podcast until she realized the governor frequently seems less interested in arguing than in finding common ground, assuming the good faith of people who have next to none to state that differently. Goldberg was open to the idea of the podcast until she realized Newsom might emphasize common ground or or let guests speak uninterrupted rather than debating all of them until presumably they submitted to the worldview she shares with Newsom. That is not actually what being open minded or curious is about. And perhaps more to the point, it's the same unoriginal approach happening all across the media that has continued to degrade political dialogue. And for what it's worth, also completely failed the left politically. In msnbc, Zeeshan Aleem said Newsom allowed Bannon to casually lie about the 2020 election without pushback and to define right wing populism as anti elitist without any substantive objection about Trump's billionaire friendly presidency. I have actually interacted with Aleem a few times and believe him to be an honest broker, but I don't think either of these characterizations are quite right on the former. Bannon preempted Newsom's pushback by saying they did steal, according to us, the 2020 election pushback. Newsom smoothly applied by audibly laughing in his face at the absurdity of this position. And on the latter, Newsom pushed back directly and verbally, leading to an extended exchange about Elon Musk and the billionaires Trump has courted into his administration. He didn't just let him off like Goldberg, Aleem concluded his criticism of the show by bemoaning the fact that, quote, it wasn't a debate. Was Newsom at times disingenuous or dodgy? Yes, he was. That is sort of his entire brand. He's a tall, handsome, slippery car salesman like talker who is extremely good at political comms. But at least he is in the arena with these people having real conversations, allowing them to be critical of his own perspectives, asking smart questions and conceding the obvious reality that Democrats are out to see right now. That's far more than most Democratic politicians or pundits can say. I really can't think of any other well known elected Democrat who has the kind of candor about the party's political weaknesses that Newsom displayed in these conversations. Aside from maybe Bernie Sanders though, he's an independent and that is literally his entire brand. The show and its implied purpose certainly invites reasonable criticism. In USA Today, POTUS warned his readers that Newsom is trying to find votes and support and most of all power, not necessarily consensus. I think that's probably true. Goldberg also made a couple reasonable suggestions about places where Newsom could have pushed back. For instance, Newsom was well within his rights to agree with Kirk about trans women in sport sports, but for his own benefit. If Newsom is going to simultaneously claim to champion LGBT rights, which he did on the show, he's going to come off as a rather weak kneed champion. If he doesn't push Kirk about his previously stated view that trans women were quote, disgusting, mentally ill, neurotic, predatory freaks. End quote. He also might have interjected when Kirk described his organization Turning Point USA as some kind of gritty startup that blossomed through Kirk's college campus appearances. It was backed by a Tea Party activist and ceded money from a deep pocketed evangelical mega donor. These are all fair call outs, but again they're smaller criticisms within a much more important larger thrust of this show. Newsom is doing something few liberal members of the media ever do, let alone left of center politicians. He's sitting with scarlet letter conservatives by his side and trying to better understand them, however self serving Newsom's intentions might be. The dialogue is earnest and there is very little gotcha nonsense or thunderdome elements that we see on CNN or Fox News. For all of that, I'm grateful and I found the show genuinely appealing. It's not just in the Tangle ethos, but it's an encouraging sign of where our political leaders are headed and a healthy response from a party leader whose party just lost a lot of power in the last election. We should all want more of this, not less, if we have any hope of our country stepping back from the abyss. And I figured it was about time somebody said so. All right, that is it for today's podcast. We'll see you guys on Sunday. Have a good one. Peace. Our podcast is written by me, Isaac Saul, and edited and engineered by John Wilson. The script is edited by our managing editor, Ari Weitzman, Will K Back, Bailey Saul and Sean Brady. The logo for our podcast was designed by Magdalena Bova, who is also our social media manager. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet75.
Wildgrain Advertiser
And if you're looking for more from.
Isaac Saul
Tangle, Please go to readtangle.com and check out our website.
Nature Documentary Narrator
From building a business to building an ecosystem to building a legacy, Overcome tomorrow's challenges together with our industrial partner ecosystem. Transform the everyday with Siemens.
New Zealand Recruitment Advertiser
Imagine waking up to breathtaking landscapes, vibrant culture and a welcoming community. New Zealand is calling. If you are a passionate early childhood, primary or secondary school teacher, New Zealand says come teach us. With up to 10,000 New Zealand dollars in relocation support, now is the time to make your move. Find out more about moving to New Zealand to teach@workforce.education.govt.nz open to existing qualified primary, secondary and ECE teachers. Note that this grant is only dispersed after a teacher has arrived in New Zealand and meets the other accompanying criteria.
Daniela Gibbs Lajay
Overwhelmed by the onslaught of the Trump administration, wondering what progressives can do to mobilize? We've got answers.
Colin Seberger
The 10 is a weekly show from the center for American Progress Action Fund that keeps you up to date on politics, policy and progress. It's co hosted by me, Colin Seberger.
Daniela Gibbs Lajay
And me, Daniela Gibbs Lajay. Tune in for expert interviews, news updates and progressive wins and strategies.
Colin Seberger
If you want a weekly lifeline to stay empowered, join us under the tent on YouTube, Apple, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
Tangle Podcast Episode Summary: "FULL EPISODE - The Friday Edition: Yes, I’d like to briefly defend Gavin Newsom"
Release Date: March 21, 2025
Host: Isaac Saul
Podcast Title: Tangle
Description: Independent, non-partisan politics news featuring diverse perspectives from across the political spectrum, alongside insightful interviews with political figures.
In this episode of Tangle, host Isaac Saul undertakes a comprehensive defense of California Governor Gavin Newsom amidst widespread criticism over Newsom’s latest political maneuver—the launch of his podcast, This Is Gavin Newsom. Saul aims to dissect the controversies surrounding the governor’s initiative to engage with right-wing personalities, providing a balanced analysis that challenges prevailing negative narratives.
Gavin Newsom has initiated a podcast titled This Is Gavin Newsom, which serves as a platform for dialogues between him and a spectrum of political thinkers, notably those aligned with the MAGA movement. The podcast features high-profile conservative figures such as:
This bold move has sparked speculation about Newsom’s potential aspirations for the 2028 presidential race, with Saul noting, “Newsom's podcast was basically his campaign announcement.”
Newsom's podcast has not been received favorably across the political landscape. Prominent criticisms include:
Michelle Goldberg (The New York Times): Questioned Newsom's strategy of leveraging right-wing influencers to rehabilitate his image, stating, “Newsom tries to use right-wing influencers to fix his image” ([03:15]).
Des Potash (USA Today): Criticized Newsom for not stepping up as a leader, asserting, “Governor Gavin Newsom could step up to be a better leader that California needs” ([03:45]).
Margaret Sullivan (The Guardian): Highlighted the irony of Newsom providing Steve Bannon with a platform, remarking, “Why is Gavin Newsom handing Steve Bannon a megaphone?” ([03:50]).
Additionally, Newsom faced backlash from political figures like Adam Kinzinger, who labeled Newsom’s actions as “unforgivable and insane” ([04:05]).
Public opinion reflected this sentiment, with Newsom's favorability among liberals dropping from 46% to 30%, and Republicans viewing him as “insincere, fake, and pandering” ([04:10]). The podcast's reception was further evidenced by its low rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars on Apple Podcasts ([04:15]).
Contrary to the prevailing criticism, Isaac Saul offers a nuanced defense of Newsom’s podcast strategy, emphasizing several key aspects:
Saul underscores the rarity and importance of Newsom engaging directly with prominent right-wing figures, stating, “It's incredible that these conversations are happening at all” ([05:00]). He highlights that unlike many liberals who limit their engagement to like-minded individuals, Newsom is fostering genuine dialogue across ideological divides.
A standout feature of Newsom's interviews is the respectful and cordial nature of the discussions. Saul notes, “Despite the radical differences in worldview between host and guest, neither devolved into shouting matches or ad hominem attacks” ([05:45]). This contrasts sharply with the often hostile exchanges typical in political discourse.
Perhaps most commendable is Newsom’s approach to the interviews: rather than using the platform to defend his record or to preach, he seeks to understand his guests’ perspectives. Saul observes, “He spent almost the entirety of both interviews asking questions that is actually trying to better understand the perspective of the guests” ([06:00]).
Saul provides insights from his own experience listening to the podcasts with Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon:
Steve Bannon’s Candor: Despite Bannon's controversial reputation, Saul found value in his honesty, stating, “Bannon... said a lot of things I actually agree with and conducted himself with a good deal of candor and grace” ([06:30]).
Newsom’s Interview Technique: Saul praises Newsom for eliciting thoughtful responses without forcing guests into defensive positions, enabling a more authentic exchange of ideas ([06:50]).
Addressing the critiques from Michelle Goldberg and Zeeshan Aleem (MSNBC), Saul counters:
On Seeking Common Ground: Goldberg criticized Newsom for seemingly favoring consensus over debate. Saul rebuts by arguing, “That is not actually what being open-minded or curious is about” ([08:00]). He suggests that seeking understanding is a more constructive approach than confrontational debating.
On Handling Misinformation: Aleem contended that Newsom allowed misinformation to go unchallenged. Saul disagrees, pointing out instances where Newsom did push back effectively, such as when Bannon falsely claimed the 2020 election was stolen. He notes, “Newsom smoothly applied by audibly laughing in his face at the absurdity of this position” ([08:30]).
Saul admits Newsom is not without flaws, acknowledging moments where he could have interjected more forcefully. However, he maintains that the overall approach fosters a healthier political dialogue.
Isaac Saul concludes by lauding Newsom’s initiative as a rare and necessary effort to bridge political divides. He emphasizes the value of earnest dialogue over partisan clashes, stating, “It's an encouraging sign of where our political leaders are headed and a healthy response from a party leader whose party just lost a lot of power in the last election” ([09:00]). Saul advocates for more such efforts to foster understanding and step back from divisive rhetoric, expressing hope that Newsom's approach could inspire a more constructive political environment.
Isaac Saul on Newsom’s Campaign Ambitions:
“I said that his podcast was basically his campaign announcement.” ([04:00])
Adam Kinzinger on Newsom’s Podcast:
“Unforgivable and insane.” ([04:05])
Isaac Saul on the Podcast's Dialogues:
“There is very little gotcha nonsense or thunderdome elements that we see on CNN or Fox News.” ([08:45])
Michelle Goldberg’s Critique:
“Newsom tries to use right-wing influencers to fix his image.” ([03:15])
Isaac Saul on Media Degradation of Political Dialogue:
“It's the same unoriginal approach happening all across the media that has continued to degrade political dialogue.” ([09:30])
Gavin Newsom’s Bold Move: Launching a podcast featuring right-wing guests to foster political dialogue.
Mixed Reactions: While facing significant criticism from media and political figures, Newsom's approach is commended for its inclusivity and respectful discourse.
Isaac Saul’s Defense: Highlights the importance of understanding differing perspectives and praises Newsom for creating a platform for genuine conversation.
Encouraging Healthy Dialogue: Emphasizes the need for more initiatives that bridge political divides, moving away from hostile and partisan exchanges.
For more insights and discussions, visit readtangle.com and subscribe to the Tangle newsletter.