Loading summary
Marc Maron
Did you know adults 60 plus lose more than $60 billion each year to financial exploitation. Greenlight's new Family Shield plan empowers you to monitor your accounts for suspicious activity, protect yourself with up to $1 million identity theft coverage, and reassure loved ones that you're safe with location sharing and place alerts. Get peace of mind today@greenlight.com protect. That's greenlight.com protect hey, it's Marc Maron.
Isaac Saul
From WTF here to let you know.
Noah Smith
That this podcast is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.
Isaac Saul
And I'm sure the reason you're listening.
Noah Smith
To this podcast right now is because you chose it well. Choose Progressives Name your price tool and you could find insurance options that fit.
Isaac Saul
Your budget so you can pick the.
Noah Smith
Best one for your situation. Who doesn't like choice? Try it@progressive.com and now some legal info. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates price and coverage match limited by state law not available in in all states Moms.
Marc Maron
Ready to make Back to school healthy and stress free. Thrive Market's got you. They restrict over 1000 sketchy ingredients so you can shop worry free. Grab high protein dinners and low sugar lunchbox faves. From lesser evil popcorn to partake cookie snack packs. They have the best kid approved swaps. And don't forget about yourself. Grab a cures hydrogel eye mask for the perfect end of day reset. Their big back to school sale makes it the perfect time to stock up now. Go to thrivemarket.com podcast for 30% off your first order and a free $60 gift from Executive producer Isaac Saul.
Isaac Saul
This is Tangle. Good morning, good afternoon and good evening and welcome to the Tangle Podcast, a place we get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking and a little bit of my take. I'm your host Isaac Saul and on today's episode we are sitting down with Noah Smith. Noah is one of my favorite writers to read on the Internet. He is decidedly liberal. He is somebody who has left wing views, but he does a really good job of criticizing his own side. He does a really good job of thinking critically about the things he's written in the past and updating his views when they change and correcting things he said before that maybe he got wrong. He is an economist and it is hard to find economic writers who can write about economics in ways that are interesting, but he manages to do it. There's a lot of personality in his writing which you can read on his blog. No opinion. So a few years ago I had Noah on the podcast for the first time and I brought him on for the story I was doing. I was interviewing him and another economist, a conservative economist named Jessica Riedel, and I was asking them both how important the debt actually was, whether the debt and deficit really mattered. And I structured this kind of conversational way where I interviewed them separately, and then I put their answers to the same questions up side by side in a podcast and a transcribed article. It's one of my favorite articles I ever did with Tangled, because you got to see how they both sort of separately frame the arguments through their worldviews. And it was really interesting. And a few months ago, I noticed that Noah had written a new piece just recently, again in the last few months, so two or three years after interviewing him, saying that he was actually alarmed about the debt. And his tone, the first time I interviewed him two or three years ago was a little bit different. He was kind of talking about all the ways in which we'd be able to spot inflation and react and adjust. And this time he talked about why some of his new concerns are really making him feel alarmed and what's happened in the last couple of years that kind of changed his view. I thought it was a really interesting conversation. It was fun to sit down with him. He pushed back on me a little bit in spots. I got to hear some of his views on top of this stuff about the tariffs and Trump's tariffs and why we haven't necessarily seen the kinds of inflation that a lot of people were predicting. So it was about a 30 minute conversation, and I think you guys are really going to enjoy it. And I'm really grateful to Noah for giving us some of his time, because he is one of the few people who writes about as much as I do and puts out an insane level of content. And so I know he's busy. I know he's also a professor and doing all sorts of stuff in the economic field. So thank you to Noah for sitting down with us, and I hope you guys enjoy the interview. Here it is. Noah Smith. Noah Smith, welcome back to the show. Thanks for being here.
Noah Smith
Hey, thanks for having me on. Wait, was I on before?
Isaac Saul
Yeah, you came ON Once in 2021, I interviewed you. I mean, it wasn't really the pod, it wasn't the podcast. It was more. We did a transcribed interview for the newsletter, which I'm actually gonna start there. So I did this piece in 2021, it's been four years now, where I interviewed you and Jessica Riedel, both separately, about the debt and the deficit. And I basically asked you each this fundamental question, like, does it really matter? And I was trying to get these competing views from more conservative, I think, fair to say, leaning economists and more, maybe left of center leaning economists about where we were, what the risks were, et cetera. It was a very nuanced conversation. I'm not going to generalize everything, but I think your general sentiment was like, there's not a ton to worry about right now, but we'll have plenty of warning signs if things are getting bad. And in March, just as Republicans were beginning to roll out their tax and spending plans that we just saw pass in the reconciliation process, you wrote a piece titled It's Time to Start Panicking about the national debt. I'm a longtime reader of yours, big fan of your work. It struck me as a very different tone than you've taken on this issue in the past. So tell me about what's happened in the last few years and what you're seeing now that's sort of prompting this worry and concern for you, like, what are some of the big red flags you're seeing?
Noah Smith
So, I mean, obviously interest rates and inflation, that's what's changed. If you look at 20, 21, you were seeing inflation start to go up in 21, but then you didn't. It could have been transitory, persistent inflation leads to rise in interest rates one way or another, because, so inflation, if you don't, if you don't do anything about it, if you don't raise real interest rates at the monetary policy level, if the Fed doesn't raise real interest rates to quell inflation, inflation pushes up nominal interest rates because you have to lend at rates that incorporate the expected rate of inflation so that you don't lose much money. So either way, interest rates are going to go up, nominal trades are going to go up, and that means that the number of dollars that you're government is on the hook for is going to go up because you're going to have to roll over this debt. The government has all this debt and then they have to roll it over. The debt doesn't last forever. It matures. And then as it matures, you've got to roll it over. You got to reborrow or pay it off permanently, but nobody does that. You roll it over. You understand that, right?
Isaac Saul
Yeah.
Noah Smith
Okay. So basically, when interest rates rise, government interest payments don't immediately rise, but they rise after a while. And so we're in that moment. And so we can see interest payments as a percentage of gdp, as a percentage of federal tax revenues, as a percentage of federal expenditures, whatever you want to call it, we see these interest payments, government interest payments rocketing up. Now what can we do about that? Well, the obvious thing to do and what Trump wants to do is cut interest rates, force the Fed to lower interest rates. Right. What happens if you just keep interest rates too low? Well, we saw this with Turkey. If you just force interest rates lower, inflation will go up. So Turkey reached, I don't remember, 55% inflation or something. Our highest was like 8, 10, maybe 8. Really?
Isaac Saul
And it was painful.
Noah Smith
And it was painful. People really hated that. Imagine what people would think at 55. So if you say we're going to deal with these interest payments by just forcing interest rates lower forever, well then you're probably going to get inflation. And so then everyone will be really mad about that. So basically what we're seeing now is called interest rate normalization. We had this period where interest rates just went down and down and down and down and down and down and down forever. Now we're seeing, oh no, that wasn't a permanent process. We're not just going to have zero or negative interest rates forever. That's not how the world works. Sometimes line go back up. The trend is your friend till the bend at the end. And so that's the big change.
Isaac Saul
We'll be right back after this quick break. This episode of Tangle is brought to you by Wildgrain. Wildgrain is the first baked from frozen subscription box for artisanal breads, pastries and pastas. Wild Grain's boxes are fully customizable to your taste and dietary restrictions. In addition to their classic variety box, they recently launched a new gluten free box and a plant based box that is a hundred percent vegan. Best of all, they take the hassle out of baking since all items baked from frozen in 25 minutes or less with no mess or cleanup. I recently got a box of Wild Grain products and included in it was their six pack of the Parmesan herb biscuits. These things were unbelievably delicious. They actually tasted like freshly baked bread after just throwing them in the oven for 25 minutes straight from frozen. So I can personally attest to how good some of this stuff really is. So if you are ready to bring all your favorite carbs right to your doorstep, be sure to check out Wild Grain so you can begin building your own box of artisanal breads, pastas and pastries. For a limited time only, Wild Grain is offering our listeners $30 off their first box plus free croissants in every box when you go to wildgrain.comtangle to start your subscription. You heard me. Free croissants in every box and $30 off your first box when you go to wildgrain.comtangle that's wildgrain.comtangle and you can use promo code Tangle at checkout. Why drop a fortune on basics when you don't have to? Quince has the good stuff. High quality fabrics, classic fits and lightweight layers for warm weather. All at prices that make sense. Everything I've ordered from Quince has been nothing but solid. I've been telling all my friends this summer that I am a linen guy. Now, this is the summer of linen for Isaac. Because I have been absolutely raiding the Quince wardrobe, buying linen shirts, linen pants, linen shorts. And it's not just the linens. Casual T shirts, fun jackets, long pants. Everything on their website that I've snagged has really been an awesome addition to my wardrobe. And I've gotten compliments on basically all of it, even from my wife who never really thinks I'm dressing myself well. So if you want to keep it classy and cool, I highly recommend the long lasting staples from Quince. Go to quince.comtangle for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's Quince Q U I N C E.comtangle and get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.comtangle Got it. So, you know, tell me a little bit about how the, the bill that Trump just passed, the reconciliation bill, the big, one big beautiful bill, sort of changes your assessment. Cause when you wrote this piece in March, or maybe it doesn't, but you wrote this piece in March and I think you made a really good point, which was that Trump is obviously not primarily to blame for our debt situation. Every past administration for the last 20 years has really contributed to it in some way. And Biden obviously passed a bunch of new spending. I'm curious how the passage of the one big beautiful bill, if it changes that assessment about Trump, how you sort of place his role in this. Now, given that some of like, you know, the CBO estimates and stuff are that this is gonna add trillions of dollars to the deficit and debt.
Noah Smith
Well, Trump did a couple things. Number one, so Keynesianism says that when you're in a bust or when you're in an emergency, you should have the government borrow and you shouldn't be afraid to have the government borrow. But when you have to pay for that someday, Keynesianism doesn't say that government debt is a free lunch. It means you have to pay for it. So if you don't pay for it in the bust or in the emergency, when are you going to pay for it? You have to pay for it when times are good. Of course, times are never as good as we think, as we'd like them to be, as we'd hope them to eventually be. But at some point, you have to say, it is time to pay back what we borrowed now, or else things will just keep spiraling out of control forever. In the 90s, we did that. So we borrowed a lot in the 80s to fund cold War buildup, et cetera. And in the 90s, we started to pay it off. We cut the deficit and we even ran a surplus and we grew. So actually, if you just hold the deficit at a low rate, you can actually grow out of your debt to some degree. In the 90s, we grew out of some of our debt. And you saw the debt to GDP ratio of the United States, which is the key variable here, we saw that go down under Bill Clinton. And then after that, George W. Bush said, no, we're just going to cut taxes, even though the economy's still doing. It's pretty solid. We had a small recession, but it was over quickly. Economy's still pretty solid. We're going to cut taxes and cut taxes and run up deficits. They didn't run up deficits by a huge amount, but they missed a chance to pay off more of the debt that we had at that time. And that was an irresponsible move by the George W. Bush administration. And it was typified by Dick Cheney saying, Reagan proved that deficits don't matter. Reagan proved no such thing. Reagan proved you can get away with it for a while. And Clinton proved that paying it back can actually be pretty good. And so then during the Great Recession, we borrowed a lot to cover that, to do stimulus. Right. We bought a lot to do stimulus during the Great Recession. And then afterwards, Republicans wanted to be very harsh in terms of cutting spending. And the Tea Party. Right. And then Democrats wanted to raise tax a little bit, but weren't very avid about raising tax. Like, Obama was not a huge tax hike guy. Obama wanted lower taxes. And so, you know, he, he. And so there were, there was not nearly as much austerity as there should have been during the second Obama term when times were good. So Obama and the Republican Congress together bear some of the blame for that. Then Trump came in. Times were unambiguously. Good. Like, we know the Great Recession's over in the late 2010s, and here come Trump in cutting taxes again. Not cutting any spending, just not doing any austerity. So Obama, and so Bush, Obama and Trump all missed the opportunity to do what Bill Clinton did and what the Keynesians say you ought to do, which is to use good times to pay back the money you borrowed in bad times, or at least pay back enough of it so that your debt doesn't become unsustainable. They just failed to do that. And so in the 90s, it looked like we might have this good political equilibrium where, yes, we're willing to borrow when we need to, but we're willing to pay it back later. And then everything works out in the 2000s and 2010s. It becomes clear that we're in a new political equilibrium where no one is willing to do the work of paying back things. And one reason why did they all do this? The reason was interest rates were low. And they could kick the can down the road because the cost of carrying additional debt was low. And not only were interest rates low, but interest rates had gone down and down and down and down and down and down and down for years and years and years and years and years and years and years. Okay? And so they thought, well, you know, well, it's like spending on your credit card. It's like taking out a bunch of debt because it's low interest rate debt, so you might as well carry the debt. Your service payments are low, but it's like an adjustable rate mortgage where interest rates can go up. Man, you're going to carry that debt until interest rates go up. But nobody thought interest rates were going up. They all made this one way macroeconomic bet on interest rates never, ever, ever, ever, ever going up. And then it happened. Interest rates went up. And so here we are.
Isaac Saul
So is there a case to be made? Or could you maybe frame the case that the fears about the debt now or the deficit now are overstated? I mean, if the Fed cuts rates once or twice before the end of the year, that could make servicing the debt less of a strain.
Noah Smith
Or what happens if you cut rates?
Isaac Saul
Inflation?
Noah Smith
Does it?
Isaac Saul
I mean, I don't know. I feel like I don't know what the hell is going to happen now.
Noah Smith
But I think it's. You've seen a lot of cases where that does happen. In theory, that's what's supposed to happen. And you've seen cases where it does happen, like Turkey. So it seems like it might happen. It might take a while or it might take more cuts or it might happen right away. You might see inflation happen right away.
Isaac Saul
I guess I'm just curious if you think that.
Noah Smith
But Isaac, what do you think about that? Isaac, what do you think about that? If we cut inflation, if we cut interest rates and we get inflation, the debt gets easier to pay, but we have inflation. Is that worth it to you? What do you think about that?
Isaac Saul
Personally, I feel like given where we are and given what a massive portion of our gdp, the debt and deficit are, and paying it off are, that yeah, it would be worth it. I think it's politically suicide. I don't think Republicans would stay in that space. Jerome Powell doesn't seem like he would tolerate much inflation. If we saw it roar back, he'd probably increase interest rates again pretty quickly. Right. So I think I would take that trade off for long term fiscal health. But I don't know that that's like a politically viable outcome, I guess is my concern. I think, like I'm convinced that the debt and deficit are a huge problem. It seems like there's nobody really arguing that it isn't. There's just people who are talking about it and people who are ignoring it.
Noah Smith
Right.
Isaac Saul
And I'm suppose I'm wondering if there's a case to be made that it's not as big of a problem as people like you might think.
Noah Smith
And the not. And the case that you're saying for it not to be a big problem is that we can just cut interest rates and accept higher inflation, probably in exchange and make the debt easier to carry. And then it's not as.
Isaac Saul
I think. I think it's a. I think it's a hard. I think it's a hard thing. Yeah, it's a hard case to make. It's not the argument I would make, but I think there are people out there who would say we still have tools, I guess, to deploy and do something about it. And I don't know if you find that viable at all or can.
Noah Smith
I mean, if you think that that's a bad case, why do you want me to make it?
Isaac Saul
I don't necessarily want you to make it. That's like one example I could think of, which is maybe we cut interest rates and tolerate some inflation and that makes the debt easier.
Noah Smith
I'm curious by the way inflation also erodes debt. So during the Biden years, you saw debt go down as a function of GDP simply because of inflation.
Isaac Saul
Interesting. Yeah, I guess I'm.
Noah Smith
Inflation increases prices, right? Prices increase dollars, like the number of dollars being paid for, you know, goods and services increases those extra dollars, get taxed at the same rate. They fill government coffers, they make inflation, makes the debt easier to pay by eroding it. And in fact, in the post war period, we did erode debt by running 4% inflation for a number of years. Right. And that's higher than the 2% target we now have. So if we did cut interest rates and we created inflation, that would both represent a slight or partial debt default and it would also make debt easier to carry. So we could erode debt. We could help get rid of debt with inflation by lowering interest rates and we could also make the debt easier to carry in the short term and reduce those interest costs. That's certainly what Trump is thinking about. The question is, are you willing to tolerate that higher inflation?
Isaac Saul
Yeah, it seems like politically the people in power are probably not. And Americans certainly seem to have signaled that they won't because I feel like cost was such a huge part central part of the 2024 election.
Noah Smith
Yeah. And as an aside, here, one reason why Americans were more willing to tolerate inflation in the 50s and 60s was because wages rose right alongside prices. You had a dilution in the value of the dollar itself, but you did not have that translate into decreases in real wages. But in the 70s you did and you had inflation that correspond with a decrease in real wages around the time of the oil shocks and other stuff like that. And so people got really mad. And again, in the post pandemic inflation in the Biden years, you saw decreases in real wages because prices were going up but wages weren't keeping up and that people really hate. So I think it appears to be real wages going down that people hate, not inflation per se, if that makes any sense.
Isaac Saul
We'll be right back after this quick break.
Marc Maron
If your dog could talk, they'd beg for Ollie. The full body tail wag, the excited little hops, the big goofy grin, the that's the Ollie effect. Ollie delivers clean, fresh nutrition in five drool worthy flavors, even for the pickiest eaters. Made in US kitchens with high quality human grade ingredients, Ollie's food contains no fillers, no preservatives, just real food. Just fill out Ollie's 32nd quiz and they'll create a customized meal plan based on your pup's weight, activity level and other health info. Dogs deserve the best and that means fresh, healthy food. Head to ollie.com healthypup Tell them about your dog and use code HEALTHYP off your welcome kit when you subscribe today. Plus, they offer a happiness guarantee on the first box, so if you're not completely satisfied, you'll get your money back. That's O l l I e.com HealthyPup and enter code HEALTHYPUP to get 60% off your first box.
Isaac Saul
Tired of your car insurance rate going up? Even with a clean driving record, you're not alone. That's why there's Jerry, your proactive insurance assistant. Jerry compares rates side by side from over 50 top insurers and helps you switch with ease. Jerry even tracks market rates and alerts.
Noah Smith
You when it's to shop. No spam calls, no hidden fees.
Isaac Saul
Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year.
Noah Smith
Switch with confidence.
Isaac Saul
Download the Jerry app or visit Jerry AI Acast today. Yeah, that makes sense to me. All right, I have one last question on the inflation stuff, and then I want to, just before we wrap up, hear your thoughts on where we're at with some of the tarif and the inflationary pressures around Trump's tariffs. One of the things I feel like got kind of memory hold about Jerome Powell specifically was, you know, a couple of Years ago, maybe 2022, 2023, one of the big things everybody was talking about was the plausibility of, like, this soft landing, which I'm not an economist, I'm not even an economics reporter, so I have a rudimentary understanding of this. But my, my, I think my correct understanding of it is like getting inflation down without destroying the job market and still managing to, you know, growth and basically not making, like, an economic apocalypse while also reducing inflation. It seems to me like inflation has been steadily coming down and we continue to get fairly good economic news on jobs, on growth, on even wages. I'm wondering if, like, you feel like we've achieved this sort of soft landing, how you would describe the moment we're in? Because Trump is obviously exerting maximum pressure on Jerome Powell to do something differently than he's been doing. And it doesn't seem to me like that's particularly wise. I sort of feel like, you know, I don't know if this is like a hot take, but he's done a pretty good job, it seems like, to me. Nobody really says that. It seems like we're in that sort of soft landing territory. I'm wondering how you read the situation, if that feels right to you or not.
Noah Smith
Hey, everybody, this is John, executive producer for Tangle. We hope you enjoyed this preview of our latest interview. If you are not currently a newsletter subscriber or or a premium podcast subscriber and you are enjoying this content and would like to finish it. You can go to readtangle.com and sign up for a newsletter subscription or you can sign up for a podcast subscription or a bundled subscription which gets you both the podcast and the newsletter and unlocks the rest of this episode as well as ad free daily podcasts, more Friday editions, Sunday editions, bonus content, interviews and so much more. Most importantly, we just to want to say thank you so much for your support. We're working hard to bring you much more content and more offerings, so stay tuned. I will join you for the daily podcast on Monday. For the rest of the crew, this is John Law signing off. Have a fantastic weekend y'. All. Peace.
Isaac Saul
Our Executive Editor and founder is me, Isaac Saul and our Executive Producer is John Wolf. Today's episode was edited and engineered by John Law. Our editorial staff is led by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman with Senior Editor Will Kaback and Associate Editors Audrey Moorhead, Bailey Saul, Lindsay Knuth and Kendall White. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75 and John Law. And to learn more about Tangle and to sign up for a membership, please visit our website@readtangle.com.
Noah Smith
Foreign hey, it's Marc Maron from WTF here to let you know that this podcast is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. And I'm sure the reason you're listening to this podcast right now is because you chose it well. Choose Progressives Name your price tool and you could find insurance options that fit your budget so you can pick the best one for your situation. Who doesn't like choice? Try it@progressive.com and now some legal info. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates price and coverage match limited by state law not available in all states.
Isaac Saul
Hi, this is Joe from Vanta. In today's digital world, compliance regulations are changing constantly and earning customer trust has never mattered more. Vanta helps companies get compliant fast and stay secure with the most advanced AI automation and continuous monitoring out there. So whether you're a startup going for your first SoC2 or ISO 27001 or a growing enterprise managing vendor Risk, Vanta makes it quick, easy and scalable. And I'm not just saying that because I work here. Get started@vanta.com this is Paige, the co.
Marc Maron
Host of Giggly Squad. I use Uber Eats for everything and I feel like people forget that you can truly order anything, especially living in New York City. It's why I love it. You can get Chinese food at any time of night, but it's not just for food. I order from CVS all the time. I'm always ordering from the grocery store. If a friend stops over, I have to order champagne. I also have this thing that whenever I travel, if I'm ever in a hotel room, I never feel like I'm missing something because I'll just Uber Eats it. The amount of times I've had to Uber eats I hair items like hairspray, deodorant, you name it, I've ordered it. On Uber Eats, you can get grocery alcohol everyday essentials in addition to restaurants and food you love. So in other words, get almost anything With Uber Eats. Order now for alcohol you must be legal drinking age. Please enjoy responsibly. Product availability varies by region. See app for details.
Podcast Summary: Tangle – Preview Episode with Isaac Saul and Noah Smith
Episode Information
In this preview episode of Tangle, host Isaac Saul engages in a compelling conversation with economist Noah Smith. Known for his incisive economic analyses and willingness to critique his own liberal leanings, Smith provides a nuanced perspective on pressing economic issues, particularly focusing on the national debt, interest rates, and inflation in the current political landscape.
Isaac Saul begins by reflecting on a previous interview conducted in 2021, where Smith expressed a relatively untroubled stance on national debt and deficits.
"[00:58] Isaac Saul: ...we'll have plenty of warning signs if things are getting bad."
Contrastingly, in a recent piece titled "It's Time to Start Panicking about the National Debt" published in March, Smith adopts a more alarmed tone. This shift underscores the evolving economic conditions and their impact on fiscal policy viewpoints.
Smith delves into the primary factors driving his newfound concern over the national debt: interest rates and inflation.
"[06:28] Noah Smith: ...if the Fed doesn't raise real interest rates to quell inflation, inflation pushes up nominal interest rates..."
He explains that rising interest rates increase the government's cost of servicing debt, exacerbating fiscal challenges. This scenario is compounded by the necessity of rolling over existing debt, which becomes more expensive as rates climb.
Smith critiques the prolonged period of low interest rates, which emboldened successive administrations to accumulate debt without adequate plans for repayment.
"[07:42] Noah Smith: ...interest rates went down and down and down for years... they thought interest rates were never... going up."
This complacency has led to a precarious situation where the current rise in interest rates threatens to destabilize the national debt framework.
Tracing the trajectory of U.S. fiscal policy over the past few decades, Smith highlights missed opportunities by both Republican and Democratic administrations to responsibly manage debt.
"[12:30] Noah Smith: ...Obama and the Republican Congress together bear some of the blame for that."
He contrasts the 1990s fiscal discipline under Bill Clinton with the subsequent decades of tax cuts and spending that neglected debt reduction, setting the stage for the current economic challenges.
Isaac Saul probes into the effects of the recent Trump-led reconciliation bill, questioning whether it alters Smith's assessment of Trump's role in the national debt crisis.
"[11:00] Isaac Saul: ...the reconciliation bill... how you sort of place his role in this."
Smith responds by contextualizing the bill within broader fiscal missteps, asserting that Trump's tax cuts during a period of economic strength further entrenched debt issues.
"[12:30] Noah Smith: ...Trump came in... cutting taxes again... missed the opportunity to do what Bill Clinton did..."
The conversation shifts to potential strategies for mitigating debt concerns, specifically the proposition of reducing interest rates to ease debt servicing.
"[16:50] Isaac Saul: So is there a case to be made... if the Fed cuts rates..."
Smith acknowledges that while cutting rates could alleviate debt pressures, it risks igniting inflation, drawing parallels to Turkey's economic predicament.
"[17:13] Noah Smith: ...Turkey reached... 55% inflation."
He emphasizes the delicate balance between managing debt and preventing runaway inflation, highlighting the political unviability of tolerating high inflation rates in the U.S.
Isaac Saul raises the topic of a soft landing, where inflation is curtailed without derailing job markets or economic growth. He queries whether the current economic indicators suggest such an outcome has been achieved.
"[22:07] Isaac Saul: ...soft landing territory. How you read the situation, if that feels right to you or not."
Smith reflects on past instances where wage growth kept pace with inflation, mitigating public discontent. However, he notes that recent trends show real wages stagnating, fueling frustration despite decreasing inflation rates.
"[19:48] Noah Smith: ...inflation increases prices... make the debt easier to pay..."
As the discussion winds down, both participants acknowledge the complexity of the current economic landscape. Smith underscores the importance of proactive fiscal management to prevent the debt from spiraling out of control, while Saul contemplates the political hurdles in implementing necessary policies.
"[22:01] Isaac Saul: ...cost was such a central part of the 2024 election."
The episode encapsulates a critical examination of U.S. fiscal policies, the interplay between interest rates and debt, and the broader implications for future economic stability.
This preview episode of Tangle offers listeners a thought-provoking dialogue between Isaac Saul and Noah Smith, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of national debt and economic policy. With Smith's informed perspectives and Saul's incisive questioning, the conversation provides valuable insights into the challenges and potential strategies for navigating the nation's fiscal future.
Notable Quotes
About the Hosts and Contributors
For more insights and exclusive content, visit readtangle.com.