PREVIEW: The Friday Edition. - Some answers to your questions.

Summary

Tangle Podcast: PREVIEW - The Friday Edition. - Some answers to your questions.

Host: Isaac Saul
Date: April 10, 2026

---

Episode Overview

In this special Friday mailbag edition, the entire Tangle team tackles a variety of listener questions, ranging from perceptions of political bias within their content, to the impact of future political climates on their business model, and the challenge of detecting AI-generated writing in journalism. The intent is to engage the show's broad, ideologically diverse audience and provide deep transparency into editorial decisions, reader feedback, and the nuts and bolts of producing non-partisan political analysis.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Perceptions of Left-Leaning Bias at Tangle

Speaker: Will K. Back, Senior Editor
Timestamps: 04:13 – 10:15

• Listener’s Concern: Jacques from Minnesota asks if Tangle has become more left-leaning, noting that this has caused some right-leaning readers—including those in politically divided households—to disengage. He proposes “Our Take” should present both a left and a right perspective.

• Response Highlights:

  • Engagement with Feedback: Will acknowledges this is one of the most frequently discussed issues at Tangle.
  • Reader Dynamics: Despite claims of leftward drift, no significant drop in conservative or independent readers is evident, though some authors of unsubscribe feedback cite perceived left-leaning bias.

    “A qualitative assessment of audience members’ reasons for unsubscribing does show a tilt toward the complaint that we lean left." — Will K. Back (05:25)

  • Growth and Audience Skew: The show’s appearance on “This American Life” (a left-leaning outlet) attracted more left-affiliated subscribers.
  • Editorial Approach: Criticism of those in power may create a perception of bias, but Tangle tries to maintain an even hand:

    “Criticism isn’t the same thing as ideology. When President Biden was in office, we were often accused of being too right... Now the reverse is true with a Republican as president.” — Will K. Back (06:40)

  • Addressing Bias Concerns:
    • Introduction of “staff dissents” to showcase internal disagreements and model constructive dialogue.
    • Third-party media bias monitors (Ad Fontes, All Sides, Media Bias Fact Check) continue to rate Tangle as centrist or slightly right of center.

      “All Sides... actually shifted us slightly to the right.” — Will K. Back (08:10)

  • Bottom Line: The “My Take” section is one of several perspectives each episode/newsletter presents, not the authoritative or only viewpoint.

---

2. Will a Calmer Political Climate Hurt Tangle?

Speaker: Isaac Saul, Host
Timestamps: 12:03 – 13:54

• Listener’s Question: Dak from Providence wonders if Tangle, which has flourished amid heightened political division, would lose relevance or audience if U.S. politics became calm and civil again.

• Response Highlights:

  • No Concern: Isaac is not worried about Tangle’s future in a less turbulent era. Political calm could help, not hurt, audience growth.

    “A decency wave in politics could be good for Tangle's bottom line. Maybe it would mean more people participating in the dialogue and more people reading Tangle.” — Isaac Saul (12:42)

  • Current Pain Points: Audience loss is mainly tied to divisiveness (“people... believe people who disagree... are the literal enemy”) and news fatigue, rather than audience boredom.
  • Business Model Confidence: Isaac sees threats to Tangle as more technological (like AI news summarizers) than political.

    “The largest threat to us are technological, like AI summarizing your entire inbox. Not political.” — Isaac Saul (13:22)

  • Value Proposition: Tangle’s unique approach and usefulness is expected to sustain it, regardless of the political weather.

---

3. Detecting AI-Generated Journalism

Speaker: Arya Weitzman, Managing Editor
Timestamps: 13:54 – 17:36

• Listener’s Question: David from Milwaukee asks how the team detects if articles are LLM (Large Language Model/AI) generated.

• Response Highlights:

  • Writing Tics: The biggest tell: “antithesis” constructions (“It’s not X, it’s Y”) and “chiasmus” (mirror-phrase structures, like JFK's "Ask not what your country…")

    “That construction… ‘it's not A, it's B,’ it's called antithesis. And it's far and away the biggest telltale sign of AI generated text.” — Arya Weitzman (14:08)

  • Other Patterns: AI models overuse headings, bulleted lists, comma-separated lists, and the EM dash (—).

    “Some members of Gen Z, in a charming linguistic neoteny, call the EM-D ChatGPT hyphen.” — Arya Weitzman (15:02)

  • Missing Human Markers: AI lacks the idiosyncrasies, incomplete sentences, and personal rhetorical flourishes of a known writer.

    “You also look for the absence of unique markers of a person's style over time.” — Arya Weitzman (16:15) “I can identify Isaac's writing because he likes to use incomplete sentences from time to time for rhetorical flourishes.” — Arya Weitzman (16:27)

  • Balance: While AI-generated writing borrows features of good prose, overreliance on these signals and lack of unique voice often betray inauthenticity.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Editorial Philosophy:

  “Our priority is and always will be sharing our honest opinions with you.” — Will K. Back (09:44)

• On Handling Feedback:

  “We wouldn't soften or alter our analysis in the name of balance or nonpartisanship.” — Will K. Back (09:54)

• On Political Trends and Business:

  “Maybe it would mean more people participating in the dialogue and more people reading Tangle.” — Isaac Saul (12:44)

• On Stylometric AI Detection:

  “In fact, we're using a bunch of them in today's piece. We don't want to avoid writing a certain way because of ChatGPT or Claude, since in many ways those models learn what to write based on examples of effective writing.” — Arya Weitzman (15:34)

---

Important Timestamps

• [02:17] – Isaac Saul introduces the episode and mailbag format.
• [04:13] – Will K. Back answers Jacques on perceived left-leaning bias.
• [12:03] – Isaac Saul addresses whether a less polarized era would hurt Tangle’s business.
• [13:54] – Arya Weitzman explains how the team identifies AI-generated text.

---

Episode Tone & Style

• Conversational and transparent, with a dash of humor and wordplay (especially from Arya).
• Directly addresses criticisms and reader anxieties, modeling the kind of respectful, nuanced discourse that Tangle strives to foster.
• Rich with editorial insight, showing the care and thoughtfulness behind Tangle’s intentions and methods for maintaining audience trust.

---

Summary for New Listeners

This episode provides a window into the inner workings and philosophy of Tangle. The team takes listener feedback seriously, openly discusses issues of bias and how audience demographics are shifting, shares why their unique model can thrive in nearly any political climate, and demystifies their approach to catching AI-generated content. If you want thoughtful, multi-perspective political commentary—and to see an organization think deeply about keeping itself fair, relevant, and authentic—this is a great starting point.

Transcript

[Will K. Back]

Acast powers the world's best podcasts.

[Acast Host]

Here's a show that we recommend.

[Jameela Jamil]

What if you laughed all through your commute? Or if you heard the funniest story while at the gym? Well, now you can I'm Jameela Jamil and guests on my new podcast Wrong Turns share their most mortifying and hilarious disaster stories. I'm talking people like Mae Martin, Bob the Drag Queen, Catherine Ryan, Jake Johnson, Margaret Cho, Simon Pegg, Penn Badgle, and so many more. So listen wherever you get your podcast. Wrong Terms where dignity Goes to die

[Acast Host]

Acast helps creators launch, grow, and monetize their podcasts everywhere.

[Rippling Advertiser]

Acast.com Most all in one HR systems are a patchwork of disconnected and manual tools. Rippling is totally automated. If you promote an employee, Rippling can automatically handle necessary updates from payroll taxes and provisioning new app permissions to assigning required manager training. That's why Rippling is the 1 rated human capital management suite on G2, TrustRadius and Gartner. If you're ready to run the backbone of your business on one unified platform, head to rippling.com acastbiz and sign up today. That's R-I P P L-I-N-.com acastbiz to

[BetterHelp Advertiser]

sign up a better help ad. Hold on one second, I just need to. What if you had a room where no one interrupts? No notifications, no expectations, just space to talk with BetterHelp Therapy happens in a space that's yours. Visit betterhelp.com randompodcast for 10% off your first month of online therapy.

[Isaac Saul]

From executive producer Isaac Saul, this is Tangle.

Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, and welcome to the Tangle Podcast, a place we get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking, and a little bit of my take. I'm your host, Isaac Saul, and on today's episode, we are doing a listener mailbag. That's right. We have loads of questions from readers and listeners that we have not gotten to, and this is an essential part of the work that we do at Tangle. We have these live events, we have email exchanges, we have social channels and Reddit and the texting platform subtext. And one of the things that we've done since the very beginning to engage with our audience is answer a question in almost every podcast or newsletter. But we get way more questions than we have newsletters or podcasts. So over time there is this big stack of unanswered questions that build up and then we do a mailbag edition to address a bunch of them. It's super fun. I love it because typically we get to cover in depth one big issue a day and this really allows us to cover many, which I appreciate. So we have a really wide ranging episode today. Everything from whether we are leaning to the left now to the existence of Doge and what happened to it and has it really shut down to questions about how our staff spots AI produced content. It's all really good. I very much appreciated going through and listening to some of the answers because as you're about to hear, we have our whole staff on today's episode because this is way more than just one person can answer. So it's not just me today. We got the whole team here, Will, Ari, Audrey, even Camille, Lindsay. It's the full gang. You guys are going to enjoy it. It's a good episode and let's get into it.

[Will K. Back]

Thanks for teeing me up, Isaac. This is Senior Editor Will K. Back and I'll be tackling the first question in today's mailbag, which comes from Jacques in Dinah, Minnesota, which is actually neighboring the suburb of Minneapolis that I grew up in, St. Louis Park. So shout out Minnesota. Love to see the representation, but Jacques asks. As a politically divided household, we gladly joined TANGLE and encouraged other couples like ourselves to join. My spouse and others in our group are no longer reading our take as they feel your organization has become significantly more left leaning in this evaluation section. When we started that was not as evident. Why are you becoming so much more left leaning in your take comments? I assume your right leaning readership has dwindled as a result. Has it? Those of us who love our right leaning spouses have connected and encouraged the use of tangle, but we are bummed that our spouses feel their side is no longer considered fairly and supported. I know that no organization can meet all needs, but your offering was so exciting and a hope for divided couples. At one point in time, why can't Our take be 2 responses, 1 more left leaning and 1 more right leaning? Maybe never. But wouldn't it be amazing if we found some issues that we could actually not tell the difference between? Here is what I wrote in response. We take this feedback very seriously. In fact, it's probably the issue that we discuss most frequently as a staff. Not specifically that we've swung to the left, but comments from readers on both sides of the political spectrum that we've strayed from our mission and become more over overtly biased than they used to Remember now, to answer one part of your question, we haven't seen evidence of a significant loss of conservative and independent readers. But a qualitative assessment of audience members reasons for unsubscribing does show a tilt toward the complaint that we lean left. A more powerful trend is that we've been adding a disproportionate number of left leaning readers as we've grown. As we've written and talked about before. We attribute this in large part to our 2024 feature in this American Life, the radio program which typically attracts more of a left leaning audience. Now we're probably accused of left leaning bias because our editorials have most recently taken a critical stance on President Trump's actions. These criticisms are often much more moderate than the ones you'd find in outlets like MSNow or the Atlantic, but they're criticisms nonetheless. One change that we have implemented with this in mind, and to highlight the ideological diversity within our staff, is the addition of staff dissents, which allow us to model constructive disagreement and offer more than one perspective in the My Take section. As we wrote back in March, we'll continue leaning into this new feature for that exact reason. But with that being said, I would push back on a few suggestions or implications in your question. First, the context of the political moment matters, and criticism isn't the same thing as ideology. When President Biden was in office, we were often accused of being too right because like most good political writers, we were taking a critical eye to the people in power. Now the reverse is true with a Republican as president and Republicans controlling both chambers of Congress. And at the risk of speaking for him, I think it's fair to say that Executive Editor Isaac Saul, who still writes the My Take section more frequently than any other writer on our staff, has been feeling increasingly frustrated with President Trump. And so that feeling from his takes probably permeates a lot of his writing and maybe your overall impression of Tangle too. I'd also note that criticisms of the president don't inherently come from a left or liberal point of view either, as we show almost daily in what the right is saying. Plenty of conservative commentators take issue with a variety of Trump's policies, his actions and his rhetoric. Now. Second, the notion that tangle has moved to the left is not backed up by independent media bias evaluators. Ad fontes still rates us as middle with high marks for reliable analysis, All Sides rates us as center and media bias Fact Check rates us as least biased. In fact, in All Sides most recent review of our content in July 2025, they actually shifted us slightly to the right. Now these evaluations aren't the be all and end all. But I think they offer a solid buffer against the idea that we've become significantly more left leaning, as I think your question implied. Third, I would encourage you and all readers and listeners not to think of the My Take as the final word on a story. Remember, we offer three arguments from the left and the right before our own, and our perspective is meant to be just one of the seven for you to consider. While it is the longest section of the newsletter, Tangle's Take is intended to be a conversation starter and hopefully a model of how to consider complex topics in an intellectually curious manner. That's why we end every My Take with a note of encouragement to write in with criticism, feedback and competing ideas, especially if you disagree. We've carved out the My Take section as a space to be completely transparent about how that day's writer is feeling and thinking about the issues that we cover, and we wouldn't soften or alter our analysis in the name of balance or nonpartisanship. So while we do take this feedback seriously and have developed some creative solutions to address it, like the staff dissent, our priority is and always will be sharing our honest opinions with you. All right now, I'm going to pass it back over to Isaac.

[Isaac Saul]

We'll be right back after this quick break. Spring is here and that is a natural reset point. So if you've been putting off cleaning up the messier parts of your business, now is the time to do something. Streamline your communications by using Quo. That's Q U O the smarter way to run Your Business Communications Quo is the number one rated business phone system on G2 with over 3,000 reviews built for how modern teams work. That's why more than 90,000 businesses, from solo operators to growing teams, rely on Quo to stay connected, professional and consistently reachable. Make this the season where no opportunity and no customer slips away. Try quo for free plus get 20% off your first six months when you go to quo.comtangle that's q u o.comtangle quo no missed calls, no missed customers

[BetterHelp Advertiser]

have you ever been stuck on a weight loss plateau, trying everything and anything you can to lose that extra weight and reach peak health? We've all been there, but Nooms unlocked a secret to reaching the mountaintop. Go in micro the Noom GLP1 microdose program starts at $99 and is delivered to your door in seven days. Start your microdose GLP1 journey today at Noom.com that's n o o m dot com Noom micro changes big results Noom GLP1 RX program involves healthy diet, exercise and support. Individual results may vary. Meds and personalization based on clinical need. Not reviewed by FDA for safety, efficacy or quality. No affiliation with Novo Nordisk, Inc. The only US source of FDA approved semaglutide not available in all 50 US states.

[Isaac Saul]

All right, next up is a question from Dak in Providence, Rhode Island. Dax said your article on Friday talks about how politics is on track to become less outwardly volatile and toxic and more kind and honest. Also, as hard as it is to imagine, we will have a post Trump era where things have hopefully calmed down quite a bit. If when this does come to pass, are you concerned that Tangle, thriving under the current political turbulence and tension, will have a subscriber and viewership plateau or slump as the political atmosphere shifts towards calm stability and decency? No, I don't worry about this at all and I'll tell you why. First, I have no idea how that hypothetical future world would impact us right now. We lose a lot of readers because the world is so divided that it's hard for a mission like ours to reach people so who believe people who disagree with them are the literal enemy. The two top reasons readers unsubscribe every day are because they're offended by something we wrote where they are fatigued by the news. I could see a world where a more decent, less partisan era of politics helps improve those problems, not worsen them. A decency wave in politics could be good for Tangle's bottom line. Maybe it would mean more people participating in the dialogue and more people reading Tangle. Second, I generally operate under the view that Tango's business model will survive all manner of political trends. The largest threat to us are technological, like AI summarizing your entire inbox. Not political. We have a good product that people use and learn from. We're affordable, we're unique, and we're adding value to people's lives with that as our winning formula. I think a less partisan, more decent political takeover wouldn't be the kind of thing that hurt us, even if it did reduce some engagement and attention toward national politics.

[Acast Host]

This is Tangle's managing editor, Arya Weitzman, answering a question from David from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. David asks after reading this line of yours, One of the obvious hallmarks of AI generated text is its formulaic nature. It's not X, it's Y. And it isn't just A, it's B, end quote. I started noticing that formula on multiple substack articles by different authors. Then the other hallmarks of LLM writing started appearing that I can't quite put my finger on. When you suspect an article is written by an LLM, what are the telltale signs you look for? Again, that's from David in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. That construction that just referenced the it's not A, it's B, it's called antithesis. And it's far and away the biggest telltale sign of AI generated text. Another related one is called chiasmus, which is Greek for diagonal arrangement, as in ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country. Or those whose lot it is to ramble can seldom write, and those who know how to write very seldom ramble. A quote from the literary critic Samuel Johnson Chiasmus was for a long time a telltale sign of great writing. Now it's a feature of AI generated text. You also see AI rely on metastructures like headings and bulleted lists all the time, sentence punctuation that tends to favor comma separated lists and eschew semicolons and a casual attraction to the EM dash. So much so that some members of Gen Z, in a charming linguistic NEOTENY, call the EM-D ChatGPT hyphen, rapidly accelerating millennial lingua files towards the boomerish takes. We entered adulthood deriding like ChatGPT get away from my EM dash, which is a real headline. And all of that can be pretty frustrating because all those features are useful tools in crafting good writing. In fact, we're using a bunch of them in today's piece. We don't want to avoid writing a certain way because of ChatGPT or Claude, since in many ways those models learn what to write based on examples of effective writing that they were trained on. On the other hand, ChatGPT's over reliance on antithesis has shown us how lazy it feels for constructing thoughts. So that is one instance we're shying away from, and we don't want to over rely on any writing tool ourselves. Looking outwardly, we expect the writers we know and follow to both write to the book and write to their style. So in order to tell whether text is AI generated, you generally look for all of its telltale antithesis, chiasmus, EM dashes, short sentences, structured headings, and comma separated or bulleted lists. But you also look for the absence of unique markers of a person's style over time. I think you just get a sense of the flavor of a certain writer. For instance, I can identify Isaac's writing because he likes to use incomplete sentences from time to time for rhetorical flourishes that'll give you the impression he's literally speaking his thoughts to you. And because, God help me, I've written more of his writing than any other writer who's ever lived, I think that I think is. I think that's actually true. But for myself to identify my own writing, I tend to get a little more, I don't know, arabesque. I mean, if you read what I wrote here, it's replete with parentheticals. And my second paragraph in this writing was all one giant run on. So you can write your own style, and it generally comes out as pretty good, or at least human and not feeling like it was made by a robot. In a way, that's pretty good. And when you see an overabundance of those telltale indicators, plus a lack of specific style markers, you probably have AI generated text. That doesn't mean that's a bad thing. It just. Well, I guess we wouldn't rate that way.

[John Wall]

Hey everybody, this is John, executive producer for Tangle. We hope you enjoyed this preview of our latest episode. If you are not currently a newsletter subscriber or a premium podcast subscriber and you are enjoying this content and would like to finish it, you can go to retangle.com and sign up for a new newsletter subscription. Or you can sign up for a podcast subscription or a bundled subscription, which gets you both the podcast and the newsletter and unlocks the rest of this episode, as well as ad free daily podcasts, more Friday editions, Sunday editions, bonus content, interviews, and so much more. Most importantly, we just want to say thank you so much for your support. We're working hard to bring you much more content and more offerings, so stay tuned. I will join you again for the daily podcast. For the rest of the crew, this is John Law signing off. Have a great day, y'.

[Isaac Saul]

All.

[John Wall]

Peace.

[Isaac Saul]

Our Executive editor and founder is me, Isaac Saul, and our executive producer is John Wall. Today's episode was edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Our editorial staff is led by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman with Senior Editor Will K. Back and Associate editors Audrey Moorhead, Lindsey Knuth and Bailey Saul. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet75. To learn more about Tangle and to sign up for a membership, please visit our [e-mail].

When you manage procurement for multiple facilities, every order matters. But when it's for a hospital system, they matter even more. Grainger gets it and knows there's no time for managing multiple suppliers and no room for shipping delays. That's why Grainger offers millions of products in fast, dependable delivery so you can keep your facility stocked, safe, and running smoothly. Call 1-800-GRAINGER Click grainger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done,

[Angie.com Advertiser]

the scouting reports end Unlock the savings at Boost Mobile, get unlimited wireless for 25amonth forever and keep your phone. It's a veteran move. Unlock the [e-mail] Unlock 25 forever requires customers to remain active on Boost Mobile Unlimited Wireless plan. For full offer details, visit boostmobile.com why

[Isaac Saul]

have I asked my H Vac guy I found on Angie.com to change my grandpa's trachea tube? Because I was so amazed by how quickly he replaced our air ducts, I knew I could trust him to change Pop Pop's tube while I was on vacation.

Make it quick, young man.

Aw, see, Pop up trusts you.

I think we should call a doctor.

[Angie.com Advertiser]

Connecting homeowners with skilled pros for over 30 years. Angie the one you trust to find

[Isaac Saul]

the ones you trust.

[Angie.com Advertiser]

Find pros for all your home [e-mail].