Loading summary
Isaac Saul
Psoriatic arthritis symptoms can be unpredictable. I had joint pain and I couldn't move like I used to. I needed relief.
Will K.
I got Cosentyx.
Isaac Saul
It helped me move better.
Darina
Cosentyx Secukinumab is prescribed for people 2 years of age and older with active psoriatic arthritis. Don't use if you're allergic to Cosentyx. Before starting, get checked for tuberculosis. An increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. Like tuberculosis or other serious bacterial, fungal or viral infections. Some were fatal. Tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms like fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough, had a vaccine or planned to or if inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, serious allergic reactions and severe eczema like skin reactions may occur. Learn more at 1-844-cosentix or cosentix.com.
Isaac Saul
Ask your traumatologist about Cosentyx.
E
Hi, I'm Darina, co founder of OpenPhone. My dad is a business owner and growing up I'll never forget his old ringtone. He made it as loud as it could go because he could not afford to miss a single customer call. That stuck with me when we started OpenPhone. Our mission was to help businesses not just stay in touch, but make every customer feel valued, no matter when they might call. OpenPhone gives your team business phone numbers to call and text customers who all through an app on your phone or computer. Your calls, messages and contacts live in one workspace so your team can stay fully aligned and reply faster. And with our AI agent answering 24. 7, you'll really never miss a customer. Over 60,000 businesses use OpenPhone. Try it now and get 20% off your first six months@openphone.com business and we can port your existing numbers over for free. Open Phone. No missed calls, no missed customers Lemonade.
Isaac Saul
Sings a Pet Insurance Customer Review My.
Darina
New puppy swallowed a bone. Still a good boy though.
Hunter Casperson
And boy was I glad that I had lived my life.
Isaac Saul
I was paid back quickly and efficiently.
Hunter Casperson
Everyone was so nice. Get this packed in.
Isaac Saul
And get a'@lemonade.com pet.
Will K.
From executive producer Isaac Saul.
E
This is Tangle.
Isaac Saul
Good morning, good afternoon and good evening and welcome to the Tangle Podcast, a place where you get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking and a little bit of my take. I'm your host Isaac Saul and today is August 5th Tuesday and that means it is our six year anniversary of our first ever public newsletter. I got a lot to say about what has happened in the last year with tangle and what's coming in the next year, including some changes right around the corner that I'm really excited about. And I'll tell you more about them on Friday. How about that? We're going to release a special podcast where I'm going to give an update about where we are at a kind of State of the Union of Tangle and some stuff coming down the pike. But suffice it to say, I sent that first official public newsletter to about 130 people. And today's newsletter is going to go out to over 400,000 people. This podcast will be downloaded 10 or 20,000 times probably. It's amazing what's happened in the last six years. I'm so grateful for it and for you and this amazing audience. So thank you guys for being here. More to say soon with that. I'm going to send it over to Will for today's main story on the Texas California redistricting fight. And I'll be back for my take.
Hunter Casperson
Thanks, Isaac. All right, let's move into today's quick hits. Number one, the European Union announced it will pause its planned retaliatory tariffs on the United States for six months while it seeks to formalize a trade deal with the Trump administration. Number two, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government voted unanimously to fire Attorney General Gali Baharav Meara, who is prosecuting the ongoing corruption case against Netanyahu. The Israeli Supreme Court issued an injunction blocking the move after the decision. Separately, Netanyahu reportedly plans to solicit support from his cabinet for a plan to fully occupy the Gaza Strip. Number three, special envoy Steve Wytkoff is expected to travel to Russia this week to pursue a deal to end the war in Ukraine. President Donald Trump's 10 day deadline to reach an agreement which he set last week, is is set to expire on Friday. Number four, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the Justice Department to open a grand jury investigation into Obama administration officials handling of intelligence about Russian interference in the 2016 election. And finally, number five, Representative Nancy Mace, a Republican from South Carolina, announced her candidacy for governor of South Carolina.
E
Well, the Republicans in Texas are trying very hard to add the five seats that Donald Trump very specifically requested. And so five seats in Texas is, is a lot of seats. You know, the balance of power in the House is three right now. So five would be, would five additional Republican seats would be really, would be really important. And it would also really impact the way that districts are drawn inside of Texas, which is we have primaries coming up, right? This is elections are always happening in this state, and so the fact that lines are being redrawn in the middle of a cycle is really difficult for election administrators to cope with on top of everything else that Texas is asking them to do.
Hunter Casperson
On Sunday, a group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas left the state to deny the Republican controlled state House the quorum necessary to vote on a new congressional map designed to give the GOP five additional seats in the U.S. house next year. In late July, President Donald Trump spearheaded the plan to redraw Texas's congressional map years in advance of the typical redistricting, which takes place every 10 years. In response, California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, is considering a special election this November to ask California voters to approve a redistricting plan that would aim to benefit Democrats in the House. Several other state governments have also started to consider early redistricting. In modern U.S. history, redistricting occurs every 10 years to ensure proportional representation following population shifts reported by the most recent census. In most states, the legislature directly controls the redrawing of state and federal legislative districts, though some have empowered independent commissions to do so. In Texas, the state House Redistricting Committee released its proposed redo of the map on Wednesday, and a House panel advanced the map on Saturday, setting up a floorboat for its approval before the Democrats left the state. In California, governor Newsom must call a statewide special election to ask voters to approve a bipartisan citizen commission to redraw the state's map. Now. Texas Republicans proposed map would redraw district lines in five districts currently held by Democrats, theoretically making them more favorable to Republicans by putting more Democratic voters into urban districts that are already safely Democratic. Furthermore, the new map would increase the number of majority Hispanic districts likely responding to Republicans improved standing with the demographic group in recent years. Texas State Rep. Todd Hunter, a Republican, said the new districts were drawn, quote, based on political performance. On Monday, Texas governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, said he will begin a process to remove Democratic lawmakers from office if they do not return to the state to take part in the House's business. Abbott's ability to take this step is unclear, but the governor cited a 2021 opinion by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that stated a district court may make a determination that a legislator has forfeited his or her office due to abandonment and can remove the legislator from office, end quote. Separately, the state House voted on Monday to issue civil arrest warrants for Democrats who fled the state. State House Democratic Leader Gene Woo said he did not know how long the group would remain absent from, but that they, quote, will do whatever it takes to stop the bill. Separately, in California, Governor Newsom faces a tight timeline to initiate redistricting in time for the 2026 midterm elections. State law requires county elections offices to send a mail ballot to every registered voter one month before Election Day, so those materials must be prepared by late September to be considered in a special election this November. The state legislature is also in recess until August 18, and any ballot measure must win a two thirds majority in both chambers to make it to a public vote. Governor Newsom has argued that California Democrats must, quote, fight fire with fire in response to Texas Republicans redistricting efforts, quote, they're doing a midterm rejection of objectivity and independence, an act we could criticize from the sideline, or an act we can respond to in kind, newsom said. Today, we'll share arguments from the right and left on the potential redistricting plans. Then Isaac gives his take.
Isaac Saul
We'll be right back after this quick break. This episode of Tangle is brought to you by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first baked from frozen subscription box for artisanal breads, pastries and pastas. Wild Grain's boxes are fully customizable to your taste and dietary restrictions. In addition to their classic variety box, they recently launched a new gluten free box and a plant based box that is 100% vegan. Best of all, they take the hassle out of baking since all items bake from frozen in 25 minutes or less with no mess or cleanup. I recently got a box of Wild Grain products and included in it was their six pack of the Parmesan Herb Biscuits. These things were unbelievably delicious. They actually tasted like freshly baked bread after just throwing them in the oven for 25 minutes straight from frozen. So I can personally attest to how good some of this stuff really is. So if you are ready to bring all your favorite carbs right to your doorstep, be sure to check out Wild Grain so you can begin building your own box of artisanal breads, pastas and pastries. For a limited time only, Wild Grain is offering our listeners $30 off their first BO, plus free croissants in every box when you go to wildgrain.comtangle to start your subscription. You heard me. Free croissants in every box and $30 off your first box when you go to wildgrain.comtangle that's wildgrain.comtangle and you can use promo code Tangle at checkout. Why drop a fortune on basics when you don't have to. Quince has the good stuff. High quality fabrics, classic fits and lightweight layers for warm weather. All at prices that make sense. Everything I've ordered from Quints has been nothing but solid. I've been telling all my friends this summer that I am a linen guy now. This is the summer of linen for Isaac because I have been absolutely raiding the Quint's wardrobe buying linen shirts, linen pants, linen shorts. And it's not just the linens. Casual T shirts, fun jackets, long pants. Everything on their website that I've snagged has really been an awesome addition to my wardrobe and I've gotten compliments on basically all of it, even from my wife who never really thinks I'm dressing myself well. So if you want to keep it classy and cool, I highly recommend the long lasting staples from Quince. Go to quince.comtangle for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's Quince Q U I N C E.com/tangle and get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.comtangle.
Hunter Casperson
Here'S what the Right is saying the right mostly supports the effort in Texas, saying that Republicans are only adopting Democrats tactics. Some say Democrats prospects in the House are dim even if California and others succeed with their own redistricting. Others question Texas state Democrats decision to flee the state. In PJ Media, Matt Margolis wrote Democrats were never against partisan gerrymandering. The moment Texas made its move, Democrats in blue states started scrambling to redraw their own maps, some even looking to override their supposedly sacred independent commissions. So much for their high minded rhetoric. Texas didn't just redraw lines, it exposed the left's dirty little secret. Democrats hate gerrymandering only when they're not the ones doing it, margolis said. That high ground vanishes the moment Democrats get the pen. When Republicans redraw lines, it's a quote crisis. When Democrats do it in places such as Illinois or New York, it's rebranded as a noble fight for representation. In recent years, Democratic lawmakers in New York, Maryland and Illinois have aggressively redrawn congressional maps to favor their party, often sidestepping legal norms, margolis wrote. In New York, Democrats bypassed an independent commission and passed a mid decade map that the state's highest court struck down as unconstitutional. Maryland's legislature overrode a veto to push a map aimed at eliminating the state's lone GOP seat, which a judge labeled extreme partisan gerrymandering. Illinois Democrats moved early to lock in a heavily favorable map. These cases reveal a clear pattern of Democrats manipulating redistricting to secure political advantage for their party in Congress. In Hot Air, Ed Morrissey argued Dems will lose the redistricting war with the gop. Democrats have total control in fewer states, but those tend to be the most populous New York, California, Illinois, Massachusetts and Maryland mainly. That offers Democrats a chance to squeeze on more seats, at least theoretically, Morrissey said. In practice, though, Democrats may have already beaten themselves. Most blue states forced redistricting into the hands of supposedly nonpartisan commissions, which means the fight could be over in the redistricting war before Democrats can even take the field. In most of these states, including California, Colorado and New Jersey, changes to the state constitution would have to go to the voters first. New York actually tried this in 2022 and got shot down in court over their absurdly gerrymandered map. None of these efforts would finish up in time to help out in 2026, with the possible exception of New Jersey, which has a regularly scheduled general election this November, morrissey wrote. The biggest problem for Democrats is time in a different context. The states they want to redistrict are bleeding voters to red states over economic and cultural differences, even if they successfully squeeze a half dozen seats or a dozen seats through these efforts for the 2026 election. And I doubt they'd outdo the GOP. Still, they will lose that much or more in 2023 after the next census. In the Fort Worth Star Telegram, Ryan J. Ruscic criticized Democrats fleeing Texas over redistricting. Trump does not want to see his final two years in office thwarted and investigated by a Democratic majority, so he demands creative cartography to forge five more districts likely to elect Republicans. Texas Republicans are happy to help, even if it means using outdated population data, wiping out black and Hispanic lawmakers, and worst of all, doing it in the middle of the decade absent a court order, rusak said. It's so egregious, Democrats say that they had to leave the state to prevent a House quorum and thus a vote Monday on the new maps. Here's the it's super important to them as politicians, to their amped up base voters and donors, and to the national party. And just about no one else cares. Schlepping to Chicago, Boston and Albany. New York will probably grind the gears in Austin enough to force a second special session, assuming the lawmakers can afford to stay there. It will cost them, though. Democrats have lost the moral high ground when it comes to the other important business of the state, rusak wrote Texas must respond to the failures of the Hill country floods, but the quorum break prevents that, too. Had they stayed, they could have railed against Republicans prioritizing the congressional power play before passing a single bill to help flood victims or prevent future tragedies. Now they bear the blame. Now here's what the left is saying. The left strongly opposes Texas redistricting effort, but many caution that Democrats should not follow suit. Some push back on claims that Democratic gerrymandering is as bad as Republican efforts. Others suggest the move by Texas Republicans could backfire. The Washington Post editorial board explored how GOP gerrymandering in Texas could spiral into partisan warfare. Advancing technology enables redistricting with a precision that the founders could never have dreamed of. Splicing and dicing the electorate in this way after every election reduces the number of truly competitive seats, which leads lawmakers to worry more about the primary challengers than the general election, the board wrote. Efforts to redraw congressional district maps are especially troubling this year, five years before the end of the decade when redistricting is supposed to happen. Although it's true that plenty of states have reworked their maps mid decade, they've typically done so after a court ruling required the change. The GOP's power play invites Democratic controlled states to further weaponize their own congressional maps. Former Texas congressman Beta o' Rourke said, we have to be absolutely ruthless about getting back in power. So yes, in California, in Illinois, in New York, wherever we have the trifecta of power, we have to use that to its absolute extent, the board noted. These are dangerous words that Democrats need to resist. Yes, in the short term, responding in kind to Republican gerrymandering might preserve Congress's balance of power, but it would be a disservice to voters in the long run. In cnn, Aaron Blake wrote, no, both sides don't gerrymander the same. Republicans pretty clearly benefit more from gerrymandering, and there is an increasingly strong case to be made that they go further in using the tools available to them. Gambits like what Texas is doing are rare, and it's been Republicans who have led the charge, Blake said. A big reason more maps appear to have a GOP bias is that Republicans simply get more opportunities to gerrymander. They have full control of more states because they hold the trifecta of the governor's mansion and both chambers of the state legislature. In the most recent round of post census redistricting, Republicans controlled the drawing of 177 districts. Estimates on this vary slightly compared to just 49 for Democrats, the reason Texas is so controversial isn't just that Republicans are drawing such a slanted map. It's mostly when they have chosen to do it. We have seen three or four modern attempts like this at mid decade redistricting, blake wrote. The GOP did this in Texas and Colorado in 2003, though the Colorado map was struck down, and in Georgia in 2005. They also redrew the maps in North Carolina in 2023. Indeed, Republicans seem to be leaning in on a mid decade redistricting arms race, knowing they have superior capabilities and can take things further just like they have before. In the Houston Chronicle, Michael Lee said Texas's redistricting puts Washington, D.C. over the rights of Texans. In 2019, when the Supreme Court said federal courts might not set limits on partisan gerrymandering, some wondered how bad it could get. Texas is about to provide an answer, and it's not good. Republicans are doing everything possible to help politicians pick their voters rather than the other way around, putting requests from Washington, D.C. over the rights of Texans, lee wrote. The Texas map already rates as one of the country's most extreme gerrymanders. Republicans are virtually assured winning two thirds of the state's seats, even though Democrats now regularly win around 45% of the vote in statewide elections. But gerrymanders this aggressive are not without risks. For starters, maximizing seats will by necessity mean making safe GOP seats less safe as map drawers spread reliably Republican voters among more districts to knock off Democrats. That move could easily backfire with Texas rapid growth and changing demographics, Lee said. Just consider last decade's map. More than half a dozen Republican districts that seemed rock solid at the start of the decade became highly competitive by the end. District populations diversified so quickly and white suburban voters shifted so sharply towards Democrats after 2016 that the districts became a nightmare for Republicans. All right, that is it for what the right and left are saying. I will pass it back over to Isaac for his take and the reader question.
Isaac Saul
All right, that is it for what the left and the right are saying. Which brings us to my take. So I spend every day of my life reading about the biggest political controversies in the world, trying to make sense of them, and then writing about them for this newsletter and of all the issues we cover. I think gerrymandering is one of the top three most critical political issues in America. It legitimately impacts nearly every other modern political issue in the country and is a genuine scandal every time a state legislature legislature takes part in it. Imagine for a moment that your neighborhood was deciding whether to allow the construction of a new 10 story apartment building. A city council member comes to your house and tells you that they are going to base their decision on a survey of the hundred adults who live in the neighborhood. If more people vote to support than against, they'll begin construction immediately. You vote against the construction of the building because it would be right next to your house. The city Council says the neighborhood approved the building and construction will move forward. Then, after the survey is over, you find out that the city council actually pulled 25 people from your neighborhood and 75 people from the next neighborhood over, knowing they'd get the result they wanted. If they conducted the poll that way, you'd be enraged and you'd have every right to be. That is in effect, what gerrymandering is for all Americans. Instead of us choosing our representatives by vote, our two major political parties are choosing the voters they want. They are not doing this in dimly lit back rooms huddled over binders of voting records. They are doing it in broad daylight, using sophisticated computer systems to draw up the perfect serpentine, totally self motivated maps so they can get exactly the voters they want within the lines they like in order to maximize their political representation at the state and national levels. The process is surgical, scientific and nearly perfected. Most Americans probably don't spend much time thinking about this issue after all, why would they? Healthcare, immigration, inflation and crime all have direct effects on their actual lives. But gerrymandering supersedes them all by attacking our principle of self governance. The very fundamental question of who are the people in office trying to solve our problems. In 2024, about 87% of the entire House of Representatives was decided by primary voters, meaning close to nine in 10 House races were non compet after the primaries. The Democrat who wins the primary race in, say, California's 12th district, which is plus 39 for Democrats, will go on to win the general election every time. That incentivizes candidates to focus on winning the Democratic primary, which means playing to the party's fringes, which means a less moderate and more polarized Congress when it happens in district after district. And this is happening in nearly nine out of 10 House races in America, as well as many mayoral, gubernatorial and Senate races, resulting in a less representative government and a less participatory electoral system, since everyone knows which political party will win the election before it even happens. I've written before about the groups like Unite America and FairVote working to solve this problem by pushing for ballot measures to introduce open primaries and ranked choice voting across the country. While I do not endorse candidates, I strongly support these organizational efforts and frankly, I think it's a travesty that so many Americans are comfortable settling for the system we currently have. As I wrote in 2022, Gerrymandering is a bipartisan crisis. While today's story is about Trump and Republicans further degrading Democratic norms in Texas, Democrats were the ones sparing little opportunity to change the maps in their favor in 2022. You can trace this tit for tat back decades. However, both parties do not share an equal portion of the blame in this race. To the bottom, Democrats, to their credit, have proposed, introduced and even passed legislation to limit or end gerrymandering, or often replacing partisan map drawers with independent redistricting commissions. Across the country, similar efforts from the right have been far narrower and garnered far less support. These, quote unquote nonpartisan commissions aren't perfect, obviously, and they don't solve the problem on their own. Fully fixing our system requires additional electoral reforms like open primaries and ranked choice voting, which we talked about last year. Unfortunately, the Texas escalation is quickly evaporating whatever momentum from the left that had existed to push for a better system. As New York Governor Kathy Hochul expressed this week, I'm tired of fighting this fight with my hand tied behind my back. In other words, the situation is already bad, but President Trump just made it a whole lot worse by pushing for a new map in Texas outside the 10 year census cycle. By overtly framing the redraw as an attempt to protect the Republican House majority, and by ignoring threats from Democrats to respond, Trump has effectively opened a new frontier in the bipartisan war against fair representation. He is doing this because Republicans are in a much more advantageous position than Democrats. Democrats will lose an arms race because they've mostly gerrymandered as far as they can go, unless they end up undoing state constitutions across the country and because Republicans have full control of more state legislatures. Kudos, at least to Representative Kevin Kiley, the Republican from California who responded to all this by introducing a bill to block all 50 states from gerrymandering ahead of the 2026 midterms. Kiley is almost certainly motivated by the fact he'll lose his Senate seat if Democrats draw new maps in California. But I couldn't care less. He is doing the right thing regardless of his own motivations, and I think anyone who views gerrymandering as the crisis it is should get behind his charge. For now, I'll offer this potentially controversial I'M glad to see Texas Democrats fleeing the state and grinding the legislature to a halt. I think this issue is important enough to justify the spectacle and dire enough to go to the absolute maximum to try to slow the process down. If Governor Abbott wants to try to punish them, he can go right ahead. But if Democrats in Texas can force everyone to press pause, think about what they are doing, and draw the nation's eyes to this scandalous power grab, that's a good thing. And if they can somehow manage to kill this effort by Trump and Republicans altogether, thereby keeping California and New York and other Democratic states from undoing years of the right reforms, and they'll have my lasting gratitude. For all those reasons, I'm rooting for them not out of any preference for one party or support for or opposition to any one politician, but because gerrymandering is that big of a crisis with that much potential to get a lot worse, that I'd support just about any political maneuver from any politician to stand in its way. We'll be right back after this quick break. The problem with group insurance is that healthcare isn't a group decision, it's personal. Group insurance means businesses get one carrier.
Hunter Casperson
And just a few plan options for.
Isaac Saul
The whole company, but that doesn't fit everyone's needs. Now a new coverage option called an.
Hunter Casperson
Ichra or Ichra allows employees to buy.
Isaac Saul
Any plan from any carrier instead of a one size fits all approach.
Hunter Casperson
Plan on something personal. Plan on an ichra.
Isaac Saul
Learn more@ambetterhealth.com ICRA Psoriatic arthritis symptoms can be unpredictable I had joint pain and I couldn't move like I used to. I needed relief.
Will K.
I got Cosentyx.
Isaac Saul
It helped me move better.
Darina
Cosentyx Secukinumab is prescribed for people 2 years of age and older with active psoriatic arthritis. Don't use if you're allergic to Cosentyx. Before starting, get checked for tuberculosis. An increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. Like tuberculosis or other serious bacterial, fungal or viral infections. Some were fatal. Tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms like fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough, had a vaccine or plan to or if inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, serious allergic reactions and severe eczema like skin reactions may occur. Learn more at 1-844-cosentyx or cosentyx.com.
Isaac Saul
Ask your rheumatologist about Cosentyx. All right, that is it for my take, which brings us to your questions answered this one's from Kate in Cascade, Colorado. Kate said, I haven't seen anywhere a history of the rescissions process, specifically what problem it was intended to resolve. It was created in 1974. Would that have been a change in response to something Nixon did? I'm just not sure I see why Congress would appropriate funds and then unappropriate them. Maybe wartime. Great question. Love the history lessons here that this kind of makes available to us. So in 1974, Congress passed the Empowerment Control act, also known as the ica, to close a loophole for executive funding power called impoundment. Before the ica, presidents could impound congressionally appropriated funds without approval from Congress for their withholdings, a power used by presidents since Thomas Jefferson. The impoundment process wasn't enshrined in the Constitution. Rather, it was justified as an extension of the take care clause that allows the executive to decide how to best execute laws enacted by Congress. Through the early 20th century, presidents used the impoundment power based on the understanding that that the total funds appropriated by Congress were available for use, but not mandatory. Presidents could withhold funds if they felt that the particular purpose of the appropriations had already been fulfilled or become unnecessary and saving on used funds would be more efficient. While presidents used their impoundment power throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, impoundments reached their peak under Richard Nixon, who impounded billions of dollars and gutted entire programs. Congress argued that this impeded the congressional power of the purse, and in response, the enacted the ICA to better define the President's power of impoundment. The ICA created two distinct uses of that power. Deferrals, where the President delays the use of the funds but intends to spend them before their expiration, and rescissions, where the President formally requests Congress to cancel a certain budget authority. This created the rescissions process we just witnessed in Congress. All right, that is it for your questions answered today. I'm going to send it back to Will for the rest of the podcast and I'll see you guys tomorrow. Have a good one. Peace.
Hunter Casperson
Thanks, Isaac. All right, jumping back in with our under the radar story for today. In May, senior White House advisor Stephen Miller said the White House had set a goal for Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to arrest 3,000 or more immigrants per day. However, on Wednesday, a Justice Department attorney said in court that no such quota had ever been given, suggesting the claim stemmed from, quote, anonymous reports in newspapers. The comment came as the Justice Department attempts to defend the administration's deportation agenda in courts across the country, and several judges have already cited the 3,000 arrests goal in rulings against the administration. Those judges have held that the appearance of an arrest quota raises constitutional questions about whether law enforcement is improperly detaining people to attempt to meet enforcement goals. Politico has the story, and you can find the link in today's Show Notes. Now on to today's numbers. The number of members in the Texas House of representatives is 150. The number of members that must be present to establish a quorum is 100. The number of Democrats in the Texas House is 62. The confirmed number of state House Democrats who have left the state to attempt to block the redistricting bill is 51. The daily fine for Texas lawmakers who abscond from the legislature is $500. Texas state legislature's monthly salary is $600. The percentage of U.S. adults who said they were satisfied with how redistricting was handled in their state was 19%, and the percentage who said they were dissatisfied was 2024%. And that's according to a January 2022 Pew Research poll about the most recent redistricting process. From that poll, the percentage of US Adults who said they had heard nothing at all about the redistricting process in their state was 41%. And finally, here's our have a nice day story. In 2019, the Environmental Protection Agency reported that the United States generated 66 million ton tons of food waste, and about 60% of that waste ended up in landfills. A pair of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute for Technology are developing a creative solution to minimize the impact of that food waste, designing a 3D printer that converts food scraps into coasters, cups and other everyday kitchen items. The invention adds to the growing portfolio of use cases for 3D printers with applications across medicine, construction and food. Popular Science has the story and you can find it in today's Show Notes. All right, that is it for today's edition. Thanks everybody for listening. We are excited to be back with another edition tomorrow. Until then, have a great day.
Isaac Saul
Our Executive editor and founder is me, Isaac Saul, and our Executive producer is John Lowell. Today's episode was edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Our editorial staff is led by Managing Editor Ari Weitz, with Senior Editor Will K. Back and Associate Editors Hunter Casperson, Audrey Moorhead Bailey Saw Lindsay Knuth and Kendall White. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet75. To learn more about Tangle and to sign up for a membership, please visit our website@retangle.com Psoriatic arthritis symptoms can be unpredictable. I had joint pain and I couldn't move like I used to. I needed relief.
Will K.
I got Cosentyx.
Isaac Saul
It helped me move better.
Darina
Cosentyx Secukenumab is prescribed for people 2 years of age and older with active psoriatic arthritis. Don't use if you're allergic to Cosentyx. Before starting, get checked for tuberculosis. An increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. Like tuberculosis or other serious bacterial, fungal or viral infections. Some were fatal. Tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms like fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough had a vaccine or plan to or if inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, serious allergic reactions and severe eczema like skin reactions may occur. Learn more at 1-844-Cosen or cosentyx.com.
Isaac Saul
Ask your dermatologist about Cosentyx.
Will K.
If your dog could talk, they'd beg for Ollie. The full body tail wag, the excited little hops, the big goofy grin. That's the Ollie effect. Ollie delivers clean, fresh nutrition in five drool worthy flavors, even for the pickiest eaters. Made in US Kitchens with high quality human grade ingredients, Ollie's food contains no fillers, no preservatives, just real food. Just fill out Ollie's 30 second quiz and they'll create a customized meal plan based on your pup's weight, activity level and other health info. Dogs deserve the best and that means fresh, healthy food. Head to ollie.com healthypup tell them about your dog and use code healthypup to get 60% off your welcome kit when you subscribe today. Plus they offer a happiness guarantee on the first box and so if you're not completely satisfied, you'll get your money back. That's O L L I-e.com HealthyPup and enter code HealthyPup to get 60% off your first box.
Isaac Saul
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever think about switching insurance companies to see if you could save some cash? Progressive makes it easy to see if you could save when you bundle your home and auto policies. Try it@progressive.com Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states.
Podcast Summary: Tangle – Republican Gerrymandering in Texas and Democrats' Response
Podcast Title: Tangle
Host: Isaac Saul
Description: Independent, non-partisan politics news featuring arguments from across the political spectrum, and interviews with political figures.
Episode: Republican Gerrymandering in Texas, and Democrats' Response
Release Date: August 5, 2025
In this milestone episode commemorating its six-year anniversary, Isaac Saul reflects on the remarkable growth of Tangle from a modest newsletter sent to 130 subscribers to a widely acclaimed podcast enjoyed by over 400,000 listeners. He hints at exciting developments on the horizon and smoothly transitions into the episode's central topic: the intense redistricting battle between Republicans in Texas and the strategic countermeasures by Democrats.
Presented by Executive Producer Hunter Casperson ([04:11])
The episode delves deep into the controversial efforts by Texas Republicans to redraw congressional district lines—a maneuver aimed at securing five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. This strategic move, heavily influenced by former President Donald Trump, seeks to capitalize on demographic shifts and political performance data to tilt the balance of power firmly in favor of Republicans.
Republican Objectives in Texas ([05:39])
Democratic Response: Absentee Tactics ([06:20])
California's Parallel Redistricting Efforts ([06:20])
Historical and Legal Context ([06:20])
Potential Outcomes and Challenges ([06:20], [10:06])
Hunter Casperson ([05:39]):
“Republicans are only adopting Democrats' tactics. Some say Democrats prospects in the House are dim even if California and others succeed with their own redistricting.”
Texas State Rep. Todd Hunter ([06:20]):
“The new districts were drawn based on political performance.”
Governor Greg Abbott ([05:39]):
“I will begin a process to remove Democratic lawmakers from office if they do not return to the state to take part in the House's business.”
Governor Gavin Newsom ([06:20]):
“We have to fight fire with fire in response to Texas Republicans redistricting efforts.”
The episode explores conservative viewpoints, highlighting analyses from outlets like PJ Media and Hot Air:
PJ Media (Matt Margolis): Criticizes Democrats for hypocrisy, pointing out that while Democrats condemn partisan gerrymandering when Republicans engage in it, they themselves have a history of manipulating district lines to their advantage in states like New York and Maryland. Margolis asserts,
“Democrats hate gerrymandering only when they're not the ones doing it.”
Hot Air (Ed Morrissey): Predicts a Republican upper hand in the redistricting battle, noting that Democrats control fewer states with stricter redistricting laws. Morrissey contends,
“Democrats may have already beaten themselves... Republicans have full control of more state legislatures.”
Fort Worth Star-Telegram (Ryan J. Ruscic): Condemns Texas Democrats for fleeing the state, arguing that their absence prioritizes political games over pressing state issues. Ruscic remarks,
“Democrats have lost the moral high ground when it comes to the other important business of the state.”
Conversely, left-leaning analyses from sources like The Washington Post Editorial Board and CNN express alarm over Texas' redistricting:
The Washington Post Editorial Board: Warns of an escalating partisan arms race in redistricting, suggesting that Republican actions in Texas may provoke Democrats to adopt similar tactics, thereby further entrenching partisan divides. They note,
“Advancing technology enables redistricting with a precision that the founders could never have dreamed of.”
CNN (Aaron Blake): Differentiates between Republican and Democratic gerrymandering, emphasizing that Republicans have a more extensive and aggressive history of manipulating district lines. Blake points out,
“Republicans pretty clearly benefit more from gerrymandering, and there is an increasingly strong case to be made that they go further in using the tools available to them.”
Houston Chronicle (Michael Lee): Highlights the disproportionate advantage Republicans gain from Texas' gerrymandering efforts, arguing that such moves undermine democratic representation. Lee states,
“Republicans are doing everything possible to help politicians pick their voters rather than the other way around.”
Isaac Saul provides a comprehensive analysis, framing gerrymandering as one of America's most critical political crises:
Gerrymandering as a Democratic Undermining Tool: Saul argues that gerrymandering fundamentally disrupts self-governance by allowing political parties to "choose" their voters, rather than the electorate selecting their representatives. He analogizes the practice to a neighborhood council manipulating survey results to approve construction against residents' wishes, highlighting the deceitful nature of redistricting for political gain.
Consequences for Governance: With approximately 87% of House races being decided in primaries, Saul emphasizes that this leads to the election of less moderate and more polarized candidates, diminishing accountability and exacerbating legislative gridlock.
Solutions and Reforms: Advocating for systemic change, Saul supports the introduction of open primaries, ranked-choice voting, and the establishment of independent redistricting commissions. He underscores the importance of these reforms in restoring fairness and competitiveness to the electoral process.
Legislative Advocacy: Saul commends Representative Kevin Kiley for introducing a bill aimed at blocking gerrymandering nationwide, viewing it as a pivotal step toward curbing partisan manipulation. He states,
“If you view gerrymandering as the crisis it is, you should get behind his charge.”
Support for Democratic Tactics: Despite potential political costs, Saul expresses support for Democrats' decision to flee Texas as a necessary stand against the broader gerrymandering crisis. He believes that such actions highlight the extent of partisan manipulation and rallies protection for fair representation.
Kate from Cascade, Colorado, poses a thoughtful question about the history and purpose of the rescissions process, to which Isaac provides an elucidative response:
Historical Context ([28:37]): The rescissions process was established in 1974 through the Empowerment Control Act (ICA), designed to limit presidential impoundment powers. Prior to the ICA, presidents like Richard Nixon could unilaterally withhold congressionally appropriated funds, undermining the legislative intent.
Mechanics of Rescissions: The ICA differentiates between deferrals (temporary delays in spending) and rescissions (formal requests to cancel budget authority), thereby reinforcing congressional oversight over executive funding decisions.
Through meticulous coverage of Texas' aggressive redistricting efforts and the multifaceted responses from both political spectrums, Tangle offers listeners a nuanced understanding of the strategic maneuvers shaping American electoral politics. Isaac Saul's incisive analysis underscores the urgent need for electoral reforms to restore democratic integrity, while highlighting the ongoing partisan struggles that complicate the pursuit of fair representation.
This detailed summary captures the essence of the podcast episode, covering all critical discussions and insights while incorporating notable quotes with accurate timestamps. It provides a comprehensive overview for listeners who may not have tuned in, maintaining an engaging and informative flow throughout.