Loading summary
A
Mic check 12 Are we recording? Hi, I'm Michelle Bernstein, an award winning chef, restaurateur and mom. I have a lot on my plate, including my psoriatic arthritis symptoms. That's why I was prescribed Cosentyx. It helps me move better.
B
Cosentyx Secukenumab is prescribed for people 2 years of age and older with active psoriatic arthritis. Don't use if you're allergic to Cosentyx before starting, get checked for tuberculosis. An increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. Like tuberculosis or other serious bacterial, fungal or viral infections. Some were fatal. Tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms like fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough had a vaccine or plan to or if inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, serious allergic reactions and severe eczema like skin reactions may occur. Learn more at 1-844-cosentyx or cosentyx.com Ask.
A
Your rheumatologist about Cosentyx.
C
Who drives the world forward? The one with the answer or the one asking the right questions? At Aramco, we start every day by asking how? How can innovation help deliver reliable energy to the world? How can technology help develop new materials to reshape cities? How can collaboration help us overcome the biggest challenges? To get to the answer, we first need to ask the right question. Search Aramco Powered by How Aramco is an energy and chemicals company with oil and gas production as its primary business.
D
Hey, it's Marc Maron from WTF here to let you know that this podcast is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. And I'm sure the reason you're listening to this podcast right now is because you chose it well. Choose progressives, name your price tool and you could find insurance options that fit your budget. So you can pick the best one for your situation. Who doesn't like choice? Try it@progressive.com and now some legal info. But Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates price and coverage match limited by state law, not available in all states.
A
From executive producer Isaac Saul, this is Tangle.
E
Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening and welcome to the Tangle Podcast, the place where you get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking, and a little bit of our take. Our take today is delivered by me, your host for the day, Ari Weitzman, Managing Editor. And today we're talking about the farm bailout bill that Donald Trump just gave to us farmers. Before we get started with that, I want to tell you about what tomorrow's Friday edition will be, which is going to be another piece from our executive editor, Isaac Saul, that addressing the explosion of antisemitism and conspiratorial thinking about Jews that we've seen over the last few years. Speaking from personal experiences, his, not mine, and with historical context, Isaac is going to both offer advice about how to address these growing beliefs, and he'll address some of them head on himself. It's going to be a really compelling edition and I encourage you to tune in for it. All right, that brings us to today's topic and our quick hits, which I will send over to John and then I'll be back in your ear for my take. Foreign.
F
Thanks, Ari, and welcome, everybody. Here are your quick hits for today. First up, the Federal Reserve's policymakers voted to lower the federal Funds rate by 25 basis points, the third rate cut of 2025. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said inflation remains persistent as the central bank also contends with a weakening labor market. Two U.S. customs and Border Protection published a notice in the Federal Register of a proposed rule for foreign tourists from 42 countries requiring them to provide their social media histories from the last five years to enter the United States. A Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman said the proposal is not final. Number three, President Donald Trump said the US Seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela. Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the tanker is part of an illicit oil shipping network supporting foreign terrorist organizations. Number four, the House of Representatives voted 312 to 112 to pass the National Defense Authorization act, which authorizes 901 billion in Pentagon spending for the year. The bill now heads to the Senate. At number five, a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration must immediately end its deployment of the California National Guard to Los Angeles. The judge said that allowing the troops to remain under Trump's control would wholly upend the federalism that is at the heart of our system of government. The ruling will not take effect until December 16th to allow the administration to appeal.
G
So what we're doing is we're taking a relatively small portion of that and we're going to be giving and providing it to the farmers in economic assistance. And we love our farmers and as you know, the farmers like me, because, you know, based on, based on voting trends, you could call it voting trends or anything else, but they're great people. They're the backbone of our country. So we're going to use that money to provide $12 billion in economic assistance to American farmers.
F
On Monday, the Trump administration announced a $12 billion bailout for farmers in response to temporary trade market disruptions and increased production costs. Most of the money, $11 billion, will be distributed as one time payments through the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program, which supports row crop farmers producing goods like corn, soybeans, oats and cotton. The remaining funds will be used to support farmers producing crops not covered by the fba. The aid comes as US Farmers report persistent challenges caused by trade disruptions linked to President Donald Trump's tariff agenda. US farmers with an adjusted gross income average below $900,000 for the 2022 through 2024 tax years are eligible for the new relief funds as long as they submit acreage reporting data by December 19, the Trump administration said payments will be released by February 28, 2026. For context, bankruptcy filings for farmers were up roughly 60% in the first two quarters of 2025 compared to the same period last year with over 180 farmers filing for bankruptcy protection. Soybean farmers have been hit especially hard amid US China trade disputes. Earlier this year, China began buying more soybeans from Brazil and Argentina in response to the new US Tariffs, leading to significant losses for farmers labor. Fertilizer, fuel oil and seed costs have also risen. The US And China subsequently reached a trade deal that includes China buying 12 million metric tons of soybeans. Agriculture Department data shows they have so far purchased 2.85 million metric tons as of October 30, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant said that they were on pace to fulfill their part of the deal. On Monday, President Trump said that the US Would fund aid for farmers through tariff revenue. The United States will be taking a small portion of the hundreds of billions of dollars we receive in tariffs, and we're going to be giving and providing it to farmers in economic assistance, the president said. Trump and Agriculture Secretary Brook Rollins also suggested that foreign owned agricultural companies were to blame for the rising input costs for farmers. Today we'll cover the $12 billion farmer bailout with views from the right, left and US farmers, and then Managing editor Ari Weit will give his take.
H
We'll be right back after this quick break. Cold mornings holiday plans. This is when I need my wardrobe to just work. That's why I'm all about quince. Quince makes the essentials every guy needs Mongolian cashmere sweaters for $50, Italian wool coats that look and feel designer and denim and chinos that fit just right. Their outerwear lineup is no joke. Down jackets, wool top coats and leather styles that are built to last. Each piece is made from premium materials trusted by factories that meet rigorous standards for craftsmanship and ethical production. Favorite thing I've bought from Quince recently was the cashmere hooded sweater. I actually got some compliments on it when I went out to the bar the other night, which is pretty rare for me. I don't typically get compliments on what I'm wearing unless my wife bought it for me, but this one I did all on my own. If you want to join me and support Tangle, you can get your wardrobe sorted and your gift lists handled with quints. Don't wait. Go to quince.comtangle for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's Q U I n c e.com Tangle Free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.comTangle.
C
Who drives the world forward? The one with the answers or the one asking the right questions? At Aramco, we start every day by asking how? How can innovation help deliver reliable energy to the world? How can technology help develop new materials to reshape cities? How can collaboration help us overcome the biggest challenges? To get to the answer, we first need to ask the right question. Search Aramco Powered by How Aramco is an energy and chemicals company with oil and gas production as its primary business.
F
All right, first up, let's start with what the right is saying. Some on the right say the bailout is a product of Trump's flawed tariffs. Others say Trump must proceed with caution or risk angering a key voting block, national Review's editors wrote. Trump bails out the farmers he kneecapped with tariffs again. It's becoming part of the Trump playbook. It goes like this 1. Farmers overwhelmingly vote for Donald Trump to be president. 2. Trump imposes enormous tariffs, unilaterally wrecking the export markets that farmers rely on to sell their crops at profitable prices, the editor said. 3. Farmers lobby the Trump administration to give them money at taxpayers expense to cope with the effects of the administration's trade policy. 4. Trump bails out the farmers with billions of federal dollars and changes nothing about the tariffs that hurt them in the first place, as crimped export markets have caused a glut of corn and soybeans. Tariffs have also raised the prices of crucial farm inputs such as fertilizer and machinery. Complicated duty schedules and trade policy uncertainty have combined to tighten supply. The average tariff rate on agricultural inputs has risen from less than 1% at the beginning of the year to 9.4%, the editors wrote. The proper solution to farmers financial woes in 2025 is the same as it was in 2018. End the tariffs Instead, the Trump administration has chosen to paint over the problem with $12 billion bailout in hot air, Ed Morrissey explored Trump's tariff reinvestment. Donald Trump has used trade wars and tariffs to muscle through better terms with trading partners, resetting the table to undo what Trump argues were deals that robbed the U.S. in the meantime, however, the brinksmanship has done its own damage, especially to the agricultural industry, where farmers have lost significant income from exports that normally would have taken place, Morrissey said. Farmer subsidies generally have widespread bipartisan support. But an attempt to redirect tariff revenue may generate pushback from Democrats, as Trump's tariffs are too much his signature policy to incorporate into bipartisan solutions. Of course, there are other options. Congress could fund the program itself apart from tariff revenues. It sounds a little absurd to suggest that $12 billion is a relatively minor outlay for the federal government. But fiscal year 2026 at the moment has a budget of $1.69 trillion in discretionary spending and far more in mandatory and statutory spending, morrissey wrote. They will likely need to choose quickly. This was urgently needed in mid October. It's likely at a crisis level at the moment and with that crisis comes political risk for Trump and the gop, which will face a very bleak harvest season at the midterms if farmers don't turn out for Republic. Alright, that is it for what the right is saying. Which brings us to what the left is saying. Many on the left say the bailout is a temporary measure that won't fix a problem of Trump's making. Others say Trump is making the same mistakes he made in his first term in Ms. Now, Hays Brown called the bailout duct tape on a broken pipe. The recent de escalation between Washington and Beijing has led to an uptick in Chinese soybean purchases, but the shift came late enough in the harvest season to ensure that prices depressed from reduced demand stayed low. Likewise, moves to cut tariffs on imports such as fertilizer have helped some, but the economic damage Trump began inflicting back in the spring is still reverberating, Brown wrote. A one time federal intervention doesn't correct the strife that Trump's tariff regime continues to fuel. The same was true during Trump's first administration, when the president began unveiling his tariff levels. I argued that Trump's trade policy mostly consists of patching together half considered solutions to problems that that Trump himself has created and calling it a win, brown said. The money that is poised to be paid out to America's farmers shouldn't be mistaken as anything more substantial than duct tape on a broken pipe. It may give the appearance of helping while doing little to fix the underlying problem, which threatens to rupture again at any moment in Inform Rob, Port said farmers need competent trade policies, not a bailout. Trump would like you to believe that this is a reinvestment of the hundreds of billions of dollars we receive in tariffs from foreign countries. This isn't how tariffs work. They're a tax, which is also why Trump implementing them through executive orders is unconstitutional and they are built into the price of imported goods and services, port wrote. The money isn't coming from foreign countries. It's coming from Americans, including, ironically enough, the very farmers who Trump is now bailing out, in part because tariffs have driven the input costs through the roof. There is no question that America needs better trade deals. There is no question that China, among others, has not been playing fair. While completely free trade would be ideal, we can't do that if the nations we trade with aren't going to play by the same rules, port said. But as pressing as that problem is, where's the evidence that Trump's approach is accomplishing anything other than higher prices for Americans and an increasing degree of economic isolation from the rest of the world? Worse, Trump's approach is further entangling our farmers and ranchers in government dependence. Alright, that is it for what the right and the left are saying. Which brings us to what farmers are saying. Some farmers say the aid will provide little relief without changes to trade policy. Others argue the US should stop subsidizing crops like soybeans in the Kansas reflector. Kansas farmer Ben Palin said Trump promises handouts to farmers. Politicians promise development benefits. We pay for it all. The Trump administration will provide several billion dollars in bailouts to farmers, with an emphasis on corn and soybean growers. Only a small portion may go to Kansas wheat farmers. Predictably, political dances followed the announcement, with various farm groups issuing statements supporting release for this money, palin wrote. It's pathetic. How about some honest conversations about what this regime has done to American farmers via a patchwork of actions that show little understanding of international trade and so many other issues. Farmers are receiving just a few breadcrumbs. The fundamental challenges of trade policy remain unsolved and our competitors are gleeful as they take market share from U.S. farmers, Palin said. The peril in farm country is real. In less than 12 months, damage done to Kansas farmers and their peers across the nation is Only just beginning to be felt. The latest bailout completely fails to address the underlying issues. In the Brownstone Institute, Virginian farmer Joel Salatin ditch the subsidies. Grow what actually works. Farmers have many choices as to what to grow. Although farmers are known for their product. Dairy farmer, orchardist, vegetable grower, livestock, they really are caretakers of a spot of creation. As a farmer, the deed recorded at the county clerk's office says, I own this land, but in reality I'm a sojourner on something I did not create. The soil, water and sunlight hitting my fields are ultimately not possessions as much as resources I have the privilege to steward. Salatin said any land that will grow soybeans is inherently good land. Nobody grows row crops on rock piles. The better the land, the more diversified the options. Why should the American taxpayer guarantee the viability of soybean farming when the world has too many soybeans? Markets and farmers are supposed to respond to supply and demand. Salatin wrote. The crop insurance safety net prejudices decisions and incentivizes dependents on one crop and one agency. Sooner or later making the same choice every year because it's easy due to a safety net will show its weakness because safety nets eventually shatter, especially if they depend on politics. All right, let's head over to Ari for his take.
E
All right. That's what the right, left and farmers are saying about this bailout. Which leads me to my take. I could write the whole take today in 60 words. Telling a simple story with a simple lesson. The story tariffs levied against the entire globe raised costs for importers and consumers of all domestic products, sending off trade wars that diminished our exports of soybeans and other crops. This motivated the government to use some of the revenue it raised to offset losses for farmers. The lesson we are robbing Peter and Paul to pay Paul. And that could be it. The same story you just heard six times with a lesson that changes slightly depending on the author's angle of attack. The problem is either government tariffs or government bailouts, or some combination of the two. But there's a deeper and I think more interesting story here that tariffs and bailouts only provide an addendum to. And if we focus solely on tariffs, then we'll learn the wrong lesson from all this. It's a story of how the incentive structure we've created for our food production makes Americans less healthy, makes farmers poorer, and has far reaching consequences that hurt us in ways we never even think about. That story starts with a root problem, which is not China buying too few soybeans. The Root problem is that U.S. farmers are not growing food. Think of a U.S. farm. What do you think it's growing? If you said corn or soy, you're probably right. In 2024, the two crops accounted for 45% of all cash crop receipts. They are easy to grow in rotation with one another and together have been common agricultural staples since US Soy production took off to meet the demand for fat and oils caused by trade disruptions in the lead up to World War II. If you reflect on what you eat, you'll probably note that corn and soy aren't 45% of your diet. So where does all that corn and soy go? A lot of it goes abroad, to countries like China or Mexico, while we import other crops from them. Somewhere between 10 and 20% of corn is exported, and roughly 50% of all US soy is exported. But most of those two crops together are used domestically. So how much of the domestic yield of our most widely produced crops would you guess becomes part of our diet? 60%? Half? Even less than that. In fact, less than 10% of the corn and soy farmers grow each year is used in food products domestically, almost all of which is highly processed. The food products that do come from American yields usually take the form of corn starches and high fructose syrups. And even though those products don't provide much of the nutrition in the average American diet, they are added to seemingly everything where they have become leading contributors to our epidemically high incidences of diabetes, heart disease, and obesity. That's the small portion of what we grow that feeds us. The other 90% goes to animal feed and biofuels. If, instead of asking what the average U.S. farm grows, I had asked, what is most U.S. agricultural land used for? The answer to that question would be different. About two thirds of agricultural land is used for grazing animals, cows, pigs, and chickens. But predominantly cows. That's a lot of land, but not nearly enough to support the number of cattle Americans consume every year on the grasses that those animals evolved to eat. Instead, cows are fed grains that are not healthy for the animal, and that, research shows, generally produce less nutritious beef. Biofuels, meanwhile, are no more beneficial to humans compared to petroleum. Corn ethanol itself burns cleaner and produces less greenhouse gases. But when you consider all the inputs, the oil used to drive the machinery and transport the fuel, the fertilizers and pesticides used in growing the corn or soy, and the land use itself, it produces a net increase in greenhouse gas emissions. Without subsidies to drive corn and soy production, using farmland to grow fuel would be an absurd proposition. As a result of all of our combined land management practices, we do a remarkably poor job feeding ourselves off of our own very fertile land. Here's a quote from a 2013 Scientific American article which remains tragically accurate today. The average Iowa cornfield has the potential to deliver more than 15 million calories per acre each year. Enough to sustain 14 people per acre with a 3,000 calorie per day diet if we ate all of the corn ourselves. But with the current allocation of corn to ethanol and animal production, we end up with an estimated 3 million calories of food per acre per year, mainly as dairy and meat products, enough to sustain only three people per acre. That is lower than the average delivery of food calories from farms in Bangladesh, Egypt and Vietnam. None of this is good for the American farmer as it creates a collective action problem. Don't grow enough and you don't earn enough. So individual farmers grow like crazy and they're turning out record yields in corn and soy. But that oversaturates the global market to the point that soybeans now cost more to grow than they do to buy. A boon for the buyer's market dominated by an incredibly small number of companies requiring taxpayer subsidies to keep individual farmers afloat. None of this is good for the American consumer either. The prices of the foods people actually eat stay high because again, most of what farmers grow isn't turned into food. The farmer and blogger Beth Hoffman put it best writing in Iowa, we have to import something like 80 to 90% of what we eat while we are one of the biggest agricultural states in the country. I like to say that if something happened like a pandemic or competing tariffs for example, we could starve here in Iowa and most of the land is farmed on the heels of the pandemic. And in the midst of tariff wars, farmers have only few options to sustain themselves. First, they can turn away from soy temporarily. Since such a large portion of the US soy crop is exported, that decision can produce an immensely wide reaching set of effects. Skipping a soy rotation in the field means turning to the other crop in their rotation corn. Less rotation means more monocropping, which means importing more pesticides and fertilizers and which increased input costs, shrinking farmers margins. And all of that means more soil erosion and more nutrient wash off that flows into the vast Mississippi drainage basin and ends up in the Gulf of Mexico, which means algae blooms that hurt ecosystems, which means fewer fish, which means fishermen get hurt among other externalities, and so on and so on. All of this creates an increasingly brittle agricultural system that goes back to harming farmers in the first place. Secondly, farmers can turn to the other asset. They can control their land itself. While their crops are becoming incredibly cheap, farmers land values are at record highs and investors are rushing to buy up farmland. The prospect of selling land that has been run by their family for generations can be painful for farmers, but the cash influx of a one time sale can be an attractive prospect to bridge the hard times. But most of the time, as someone involved in agricultural finance told me, farmers sell the land to another farmer in the area, getting out of the farming business completely. That consolidation further incentivizes row crop rotations that rely on soy and corn. Lastly, farmers can rely on government assistance to provide that bridge to better times as we're seeing today with the new tariff bailouts. But what better times are coming? Providing assistance to farmers now is essential. But if we continue to incentivize a dual crop system that keeps food expensive and unhealthy, keeps farmers dependent on external assistance, and degrades local and far reaching environments, then we aren't solving the problem. But if we continue to incentivize a dual crop system that keeps food expensive and unhealthy, keeps farmers dependent on external assistance, and degrades local and far reaching environments, then we aren't solving the problem. So I'll end with some good news and some bad news. First, the good news. We have the tools to address this problem in both the public and private sectors today. Publicly, the USDA administers the Conservation Reserve Program to offer assistance to farmers. It is designed not just to continue to perpetuate the cycles of financial dependency, but to encourage practices that help prevent soil erosion and improve water quality and general farm sustainability. Privately, some companies are popping up that offer discount financing rates to farmers for incorporating regenerative farming practices that will improve the long term health of their farms. Profitable farmers, hardy cropland and healthy diets are not mutually exclusive. In theory, they should go hand in hand. The bad news you can probably already tell for yourself. We are currently going in the wrong direction. Tariffs don't help our farm system and bailing out farmers so they can turn to corn won't help in the long term either. Our agricultural issues are far more likely to turn into a full blown crisis before they ever take a turn for the better. Hopefully they do. But first, something's got to change.
H
We'll be right back after this quick break. You may have heard of HelloFresh. They're the number one meal kit in America. Making home cooking easier with chef crafted recipes and fresh ingredients delivered straight to your door. But this fall, they're serving up something even more to love. This isn't the hellofresh you remember. It's bigger. HelloFresh has doubled its menu. Now you can choose from a hundred options each week, including new seasonal dishes and recipes from around the world. You can dig into better portions that'll keep everyone satisfied. I know the value of hellofresh because I've used it and when it arrives at my door, it just simplifies the whole week. The best way to cook just got better. Go to hellofresh.com tangle10fmnow to get 10 free meals and a free breakfast for life. One per box with active subscription free meals applied as discount on first box. New subscribers only varies by plan. That's hellofresh.com tangle10fm to get 10 free meals plus free breakfast for life.
A
Take control of the numbers and supercharge your small business with zero. That's that's Xero. With our easy to use accounting software with automation and reporting features, you'll spend less time on manual tasks and more time understanding how your business is doing. 87% of surveyed US customers agree Xero helps improve financial visibility. Search Xero with an x or visit xero.comacast to start your 30 day free trial. Conditions apply.
E
That's it for my take on this issue today, which will bring us to your questions answered. This one comes from Jeff from the Villages in Florida. Jeff asks what became of the measles outbreak? Seems like a media blackout of late. This is a timely question. In January, measles was reported in a largely unvaccinated Mennonite community in West Texas. The disease spread from there, with 762 reported cases in Texas by that sparked a lot of coverage about the spread of the disease, which was the largest single outbreak of measles in the United States since 2000, when the US declared the disease eliminated in the country. However, after 42 days without a new reported case, the Texas State Department of Health declared the outbreak over on August 18th. That marked the end of the measles chapter in Texas. However, cases are now being reported in other regions. On December 5, Colorado reported a new case of measles and South Carolina reported its 87th case so far this year. And by the way, 77 of those infected were not vaccinated for the disease. If the cases continue, the US could lose its elimination status, which the World Health Organization would revoke after 12 consecutive months of sustained transmission. Canada recently lost their 27 year measles elimination status following an outbreak in New Brunswick, and the United States is Now entering its 11th month since the initial outbreak in Texas. All told, over 1800 cases of measles have been reported in the US so far this year, so the outbreak from June did not turn into the worst case scenario. You stopped hearing about it in public because of that, but the spread of measles hasn't been resolved either. That's it for our listener question today. I'm going to send it back over to John for the rest of the podcast and I'll talk to you soon. Have a good one.
F
Thanks, Ari. Here's your under the radar story for today, folks. On Monday, Maria Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader who has been in hiding for a year, escaped the country via boat seeking to reach Norway in time to receive her Nobel Peace Prize. According to a person close to the escape effort, Machado and two associates passed through 10 military checkpoints without detection over the course of 10 hours before reaching the coast. Then they arrived in Curacao by wooden fishing boat on Tuesday afternoon, took a plane to Miami, then flew to Oslo. Machado's team reportedly informed the Trump administration of the escape route to ensure they would not target the boat as part of their strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean. The Wall Street Journal has this story and there's a link in today's episode description. Alright, next up is our numbers section. The price per bushel of soybeans on January 21, 2025 was $10.67. The price per bushel of soybeans on December 10, 2025 was $10.91. The approximate value of US agricultural exports in 2024 was $176 billion. The average percentage of total agricultural production that the US exports annually is 20%. The total export value of US soybeans in 2024 was $24.47 billion. The compound average growth in export value for US soybeans between 2015 and 20, according to a September 2025 National Corn Growers association survey, 46% of US farmers say the country is on the brink of a farm crisis, while 33% say it may be. The percentage of farmers who say they are more concerned about their farm's financial situation than a year ago is 65%. And the percentage of vote received by Donald Trump in the 2024 election. In farm counties, defined as counties where 25% or more of average annual earnings were derived from farming or or 16% or more of jobs, we're farming is 77.7% and last but not least, our have a nice day story. In 2022, 13 year old Alyssa was diagnosed with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Today she's cancer free after researchers from University College London treated her blood cancer with a novel gene editing procedure that transcribed transformed the DNA in her blood cells into a cancer fighting living drug. They have now treated eight more children and two adults with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Out of the 11 people they've treated, seven remained disease free and nine achieved a deep remission that enabled them to have a bone marrow transplant. That includes Alyssa, who says she wants to grow up to be a blood cancer researcher. I'm looking into doing an apprenticeship in biomedical science and hopefully one day I'll go into blood cancer research as well, alyssa said. The BBC has this story and there's a link in today's episode description alright everybody, that is it for today's episode. As always, if you'd like to support our work, Please go to readtangle.com where you can sign up for a newsletter membership, podcast membership or a bundled membership that gets you a discount on both. Issac, Ari and Camille will be here for the suspension of the Rules podcast, which we will also be debuting the full video version version of on our YouTube channel tomorrow, and I will return on Monday. For the rest of the crew, this is John Law signing off. Have an absolutely fantastic weekend y'.
E
All.
H
Peace Our Executive Editor and founder is me, Isaac Saul and our Executive Producer is John Lowell. Today's episode was edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Our editorial staff is led by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, with Senior Editor Will K. Back and Associate Editors Hunter Casperson, Audrey Moorhead Bailey Saw Lindsay Knuth and Kendall White. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet75. To learn more about Tangle and to sign up for a membership, please visit our website@retangle.com.
C
Who drives the world forward? The one with the answers or the one asking the right questions? At Aramco, we start every day by asking how? How can innovation help deliver reliable energy to the world? How can technology help develop new materials to reshape cities? How can collaboration help us overcome the biggest challenges? To get to the answer, we first need to ask the right question. Search Aramco Powered by How Aramco is an energy and chemicals company with oil and gas production as its primary business.
A
Take control of the numbers and supercharge your small business with Xero. That's Xero with our easy to use accounting software with automation and reporting features, you'll spend less time on manual tasks and more time understanding how your business is doing. 87% of surveyed US customers agree zero helps improve financial visibility. Search Xero with an x or visit xero.comacast to start your 30 day free trial. Conditions apply.
D
Hey, it's Marc Maron from WTF here to let you know that this podcast is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. And I'm sure the reason you're listening to this podcast right now is because you chose it well. Choose Progressives Name your price tool and you could find insurance options that fit your. Budget it so you can pick the best one for your situation. Who doesn't like choice? Try it@progressive.com and now some legal info. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates price and coverage match limited by state law. Not available in all states.
Date: December 11, 2025
Host: Ari Weitzman (Managing Editor, sitting in for Isaac Saul)
Podcast Theme: Analytical, independent coverage of political news, focused on bipartisan perspectives and in-depth discussion.
This episode of Tangle dives into the Trump administration’s newly announced $12 billion farm bailout—a response to recent farm bankruptcies, high input costs, and ongoing ripple effects from U.S. tariffs, particularly those impacting U.S.-China trade relations. The show breaks down both the mechanics of the bailout and the wide-ranging impact of current agricultural policies, offering insights and critiques from the political right, left, and farmers themselves. Ari Weitzman concludes with a sweeping analysis linking farm bailouts to deeper issues in American agriculture and incentives.
Notable Quote:
"The United States will be taking a small portion of the hundreds of billions of dollars we receive in tariffs, and we're going to be giving and providing it to farmers in economic assistance."
— President Donald Trump (05:06)
National Review:
Ed Morrissey:
Notable Quote:
"Trump bails out the farmers he kneecapped with tariffs again. It's becoming part of the Trump playbook."
— National Review Editors (09:49)
Hays Brown (MSNBC):
Rob Port (Forum):
Notable Quote:
"A one-time federal intervention doesn't correct the strife that Trump's tariff regime continues to fuel."
— Hays Brown (13:28)
"The money isn't coming from foreign countries. It's coming from Americans, including, ironically enough, the very farmers who Trump is now bailing out."
— Rob Port (14:19)
Kansas Reflector (Ben Palin):
Joel Salatin (Brownstone Institute):
Notable Quotes:
"Farmers are receiving just a few breadcrumbs. The fundamental challenges of trade policy remain unsolved and our competitors are gleeful as they take market share from U.S. farmers."
— Ben Palin (Kansas Reflector) (15:19)
"Why should the American taxpayer guarantee the viability of soybean farming when the world has too many soybeans? Markets and farmers are supposed to respond to supply and demand."
— Joel Salatin (Brownstone Institute) (16:21)
Notable Moments/Quotes:
"The lesson: we are robbing Peter and Paul to pay Paul."
— Ari Weitzman (17:50)
"Less than 10% of the corn and soy farmers grow each year is used in food products domestically, almost all of which is highly processed."
— Ari Weitzman (21:10)
"Profitable farmers, hardy cropland and healthy diets are not mutually exclusive. In theory, they should go hand in hand. The bad news — we are currently going in the wrong direction. Tariffs don't help our farm system and bailing out farmers so they can turn to corn won't help in the long term either."
— Ari Weitzman (26:10)
President Trump on Bailout Funding:
"The United States will be taking a small portion of the hundreds of billions of dollars we receive in tariffs, and we're going to be giving and providing it to farmers in economic assistance."
(07:31)
National Review on Bailout Logic:
"Trump bails out the farmers he kneecapped with tariffs again. It's becoming part of the Trump playbook."
(09:52)
Hays Brown on Effectiveness:
"A one-time federal intervention doesn't correct the strife that Trump's tariff regime continues to fuel."
(13:28)
Ben Palin on Harsh Realities for Farmers:
"Farmers are receiving just a few breadcrumbs."
(15:19)
Joel Salatin on Market Distortions:
"The crop insurance safety net prejudices decisions and incentivizes dependence on one crop and one agency."
(16:50)
Ari Weitzman’s Core Summary:
"The lesson: we are robbing Peter and Paul to pay Paul."
(17:50)
This episode thoroughly dissects the $12 billion farm bailout as not just a short-term response to trade-driven turmoil, but evidence of much deeper problems in U.S. agriculture—from skewed incentives that hurt both farmers and consumers to the consequences of depending on government intervention. Perspectives from political commentators and farmers converge on frustration with the cycle of tariffs and bailouts. Ari Weitzman offers a nuanced critique, urging reconsideration of the policies and incentives shaping American farming.