Loading summary
Paige
This is Paige, the co host of Giggly Squad. I use Uber Eats for everything and I feel like people forget that you can truly order anything, especially living in New York City. It's why I love it. You can get Chinese food at any time of night, but it's not just for food. I order from CVS all the time. I'm always ordering from the grocery store. If a friend stops over, I have to order champagne. I also have this thing that whenever I travel, if I'm ever in a hotel room, I never feel like I'm missing something because I'll just Uber Eats it. The amount of times I've had to Uber eats hair items like hairspray, deodorant, you name it, I've ordered it. On Uber Eats, you can get grocery alcohol everyday essentials in addition to restaurants and food you love. So in other words, get almost anything. With Uber Eats. Order now for alcohol you must be legal drinking age. Please enjoy responsibly. Product availability varies by region. See app for details.
Dr. Patrick McGrath
What if I told you that right now millions of people are living with a debilitating condition that's so misunderstood, many of them don't even know that they have it. That condition is Obsessive compulsive disorder, or OCD. I'm Dr. Patrick McGrath, the chief clinical officer of NOCD, and in the 25 years I've been treating OCD, I've met so many people who are suffering from the condition in silence, unaware of just what it was. OCD can create overwhelming anxiety and fear around what you value most, make you question your identity, beliefs and morals, and drive you to perform mentally and physically draining compulsions or rituals. Over my career, I've seen just how devastating OCD can be when it's left untreated. But help is available. That's where NOCD comes in. NOCD is the world's largest virtual therapy provider for obsessive Compulsive disorder. Our licensed therapists are trained in exposure and response prevention therapy, a specialized treatment proven to be incredibly effective for OCD. So visit NOCD.com to schedule a free 15 minute call with our team. That's N O C D.com Ryan Reynolds.
Ryan Reynolds
Here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same Premium Wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities, so do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do@mintmobile.com.
Isaac Saul
Switch upfront payment of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first 3 months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com.
Paige
From executive producer Isaac.
Isaac Saul
Saul, this is Tangle. Good morning, good afternoon and good evening and welcome to the Tangle Podcast, a place where we get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking and a little bit of my take. I'm your host, Isaac Saul, and on today's episode, we're going to be talking about the arrest of Milwaukee County Judge Hannah dugan. It is April 28, Monday. There is more news than ever, it feels like. So you know, this was a tough story to pick out of the crop, but we've got a lot of interesting topics coming this week to break down. Before we do though, I want to give you a quick heads up. First of all, we need your help this month, every month at Tangle. Just a little peel back on the curtain. We set some goals for our growth and the goals, obviously they hit different kinds of metrics, but one of the big ones, one of the big goals that we set is paid memberships. That is people who either subscribe to the podcast to get ad free podcasts and unlock special content or subscribe to the newsletter to get ad free newsletters and unlock special content. This week we're behind. We're like 90% of the way through the month and we're about 60, 65% of the way to our goal this month. Excuse me. Sometimes that happens and it's no big deal. And next month we'll make it up, we'll have a great month. Sometimes you get a few of those months in a row and yeah, it constrain things and it's difficult. So the upshot of what's happening right now is we're behind this month. And I thought why not just tell our audience that and ask those of you who've been on the fence about subscribing to make the jump because it'd be really helpful for us. So just putting this little plug up top of the podcast to say if you're not yet a Tangle member, you can become one by going to readtangle.com and clicking the membership page. When you do that, you can subscribe for a bundle membership, which gets you total access to the newsletter and podcast for $99 a year. It also eliminates ads on the podcast. So if you get annoyed by all the ad rolls that exist in our various podcasts and shows, you can eliminate them by subscribing to the podcast. Sort of directs you to add a members only podcast to your feed and then you don't have ads anymore. Plus you unlock a bunch of stuff. So just recently we published a piece on Friday where I made the case that Biden really did make a mess of immigration. On the newsletter website side we had a piece from a woman whose son was killed by MS.13. It was a members only piece. She wrote about, despite that experience, why she still opposes Trump's deportation. Super controversial, interesting piece. I interviewed Richard Hanania, a Trump voter who regretted his choice a couple weeks ago. That was a members only podcast. All this kind of content comes out on a regular basis. So go to retangle.com, click the membership page. It's also retangled.com membership to become a member. You can also subscribe by going through Supercast and on that membership page you can click just at the bottom. You can subscribe just to the podcast only if you're only a podcast listener. Lots of great choices. Anyway, it would be awesome if in the last few days of this month we were able to catch our goal. So just figured I'd say so. And with that, now that I'm done begging for your money, your hard earned dollars in these difficult economic times, I'm going to send it over to John for today's main story and I'll be back for my take.
John Law
Thanks Isaac and welcome everybody. Hope you all had an absolutely wonderful weekend. And I just wanted to real quick shout out that I appreciate a lot of the commentary that has been left on the YouTube video. Some very kind and thought provoking comments as well. So a lot of feedback to take in which I really appreciate as we move forward on trying to build this YouTube channel and start producing more video content. With that said, here are your quick hits for today. First up, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States would make a decision this week about whether to continue its attempts to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. The remarks follow President Donald Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during Pope Francis funeral and Trump's public criticism of a Russian drone attack on Kyiv on Thursday. Separately, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a three day ceasefire in Ukraine starting on May 8 to mark the commemoration of the end of World War II. 2 Eleven people were killed and at least 20 were injured after a man drove a vehicle into a crowd at a street festival in Vancouver, British Columbia. Vancouver police said they have arrested a suspect but do not believe it was an act of terrorism. Number three, the Trump administration restored potentially thousands of student visa registrations that it had attempted to cancel following a series of legal challenges to the elimination of visas from a federal database used to track foreign students. Separately, the Trump administration deported two mothers in the country illegally with their children, some of whom are US citizens aged 2, 4 and 7. Number four, former representative George Santos, was sentenced to seven years and three months in prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. And number five, Representative Gerry Connolly, the Democrat from Virginia, announced that he will resign as a ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and will not seek reelection in 2026 due to ongoing health challenges from cancer. The FBI has arrested a Wisconsin judge over allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant evade arrest. Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested this morning at a courthouse before being released. She's been charged with concealing a person from arrest and obstruction. FBI Director Cash Patel announcing the arrest on X. The complaint states that last week ICE planned to arrest Eduardo Flores Ruiz during a court appearance on domestic abuse char but that Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected agents away. On Friday, the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan for allegedly helping an unauthorized migrant evade arrest. Dugan was charged with obstructing or impeding a proceeding before a department or agency of the United States and concealing an individual to prevent his discovery and arrest, as stated in a criminal complaint signed by Milwaukee FBI agents and unsealed on Friday. According to the complaint, Eduardo Flores Ruiz was charged in Milwaukee, Wisconsin with battery and domestic abuse on March 18 for an incident that allegedly occurred on March 12. Then agents from the Department of Homeland Security and Milwaukee's Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations identified Flores Ruiz as a Mexican national who had entered the United States illegally after having been deported in 2013. ICE ERO issued a warrant for Flores Ruiz's arrest on April 17. Judge Dugan presided over Flores Ruiz's criminal hearing on April 18, after which FBI, ICE and Drug Enforcement Agency agents planned to arrest Flores Ruiz in a public hallway outside the courtroom. According to the complaint, Judge Dugan appeared visibly angry when informed of ice's presence, then allegedly attempted to expedite Flores Ruiz's hearing before directing him to exit through a jury door to avoid arrest. DEA and FBI agents pursued Flores Ruiz outside the courthouse and apprehended him. On Friday, FBI agents arrested Dugan on obstruction of justice charges. We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from the subject to be arrested in her courthouse Eduardo Flores Ruiz allowing the subject, an illegal alien, to evade arrest, FBI Director Cash Patel said in a post on X on Friday. Many Republicans immediately supported Dugan's arrest and criticized her behavior. I think some of these judges think they are beyond and above the law, and they are not, attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News. We're sending a very strong message today. In Wisconsin, state Republicans signaled that they may remove Judge Dugan from office. Conversely, many Democrats spoke out against Dugan's arrest. It is remarkable that the administration would dare to start arresting state court judges, representative Jamie Raskin said. It's a whole new descent into chaos. Representative Mark Pokin called the judge's arrest stuff I expect from Third World countries. Details of the case resemble a similar occurrence during Trump's first term, when Massachusetts Judge Shelley Joseph was criminally charged with impeding a federal immigration arrest of a defendant in her courtroom in 2018. Federal prosecutors agreed to drop Joseph's case in 2022, but state judicial disciplinary authorities accused her of engaging in willful misconduct in December 2024. Today we'll break down what the left and right are saying about Dugan's arrest and then Isaac's take.
Isaac Saul
We'll be right back after this quick break.
John Law
It's a cold day here in Alaska, but there's one animal seemingly unaffected. Bright eyed and determined enters the husky. Observe as they go up the mountain, guided by pure instinct. They are truly amazing masters of this wilderness. But even these amazing pets can't sign up for Lemonade Pet Insurance. You can sign up now@lemonade.com Amazing.
Dr. Patrick McGrath
Picture this. You're halfway through a DIY car fix, tools scattered everywhere, and boom. You realise you're missing a part. It's okay because you know, whatever it is, it's on ebay. They've got everything. Brakes, headlights, cold air intakes, whatever you need. And it's guaranteed to fit. Which means no more crossing your fingers and hoping you ordered the right thing. All the parts you need at prices you'll love. Guaranteed to fit every time. Ebay Things people love.
John Law
Alright, first up, let's start with what the left is saying. The left is critical of Dugan's arrest, with many arguing the Trump administration is trying to intimidate judges. Some say this story is a predictable outcome of ICE's courtroom arrest policy. Others suggest the arrest introduces more uncertainty into the relationship between the executive and the judiciary. In the Atlantic, Adam Serwer said the Trump administration is sending a clear message to the judiciary. Bondi might have easily stuck to the specifics of Dugan's case, insisting that her behavior was particularly egregious and that Dugan's indictment was about her individual conduct and not the judiciary as a whole. Indeed, in 2019, that's precisely what the Donald Trump appointed U.S. attorney, Andrew yelling did in a similar case when a Massachusetts judge, Shelley Joseph, was indicted for allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant escape, serwer wrote. But Bondi chose to do the opposite, implying that Dugan's indictment was an attempt to intimidate the judiciary itself. The message is that judges who anger the administration will be prosecuted at Trump's whim. One need not approve of Dugan's alleged conduct here to understand that the Trump administration is attempting to intimidate judges into doing its bidding. After all, there are other ways to sanction judges. Although the federal case against Joseph was dismissed, she has been charged by the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, a process that avoids executive encroachments on judicial authority, Serber said. Allowing the Wisconsin Judicial Commission to evaluate whether Dugan's behavior crossed a line, however, would not yield the political result that Trump and Bondi are seeking. In Slate, Douglas Keith argued that Dugan's arrest puts us all at risk. The move is an escalation in the conflict between the Trump administration and local authorities over immigration policies. It also undermines the ability of judiciaries to effectively carry out their duties, Keith wrote. ICE's own policy changes, which dramatically increase the frequency of immigration arrests in courthouses, set federal law enforcement on a collision course with state courts. These policy changes were made despite ample evidence and clear calls from judges, prosecutors and others that immigration enforcement in state courthouses makes communities less safe. These arrests resulted in chaos in courthouses across the country. Chase scenes played out in courthouse halls. People who were scheduled to appear before a judge disappeared immediately before their hearing. One incident in New York City was so violent that witnesses thought the person ICE arrested had been kidnapped, Keith said. If the government has any interest in keeping communities safe, it can heed the calls of those judges, prosecutors and court administrators who have clearly said keep immigration enforcement out of courts and let judges do their jobs. In New York magazine, Christian Farias wrote, dugan's arrest has nothing to do with public safety. In a close reading of a 13 page affidavit supporting the criminal complaint, which notes that Dugan became visibly angry when she learned of ice's presence at the courthouse last week. A turn of events she called absurd reveals the true import of the circus. None of it made anyone any safer, farias said. As a matter of basic federalism, which Republicans and conservatives have long embraced. Armed federal agents from ICE and the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration shouldn't be roaming around a state courthouse looking for people who are there for other reasons. These kinds of tactics hamper the court system in other ways. Victims and witnesses with immigrant backgrounds become fearful and unwilling to come to the court when their presence and participation is essentially in cases that have nothing to do with criminal law, firios wrote. The chilling effect on future court operations will be unavoidable. Coupled with the Trump Justice Department's stated policy of going after state and local officials who don't fall in line with the administration's immigration crackdown, Dugan's arrest may be just the tip of the spear in our new federalism. Alright, that is it for what the left is saying. Which brings us to what the right is saying. Many on the right support Dugan's arrest, saying she is credibly accused of aiding Flores Ruiz's attempt to evade ice. Some say that Dugan is the latest judge to try to subvert the law for political ends. Others suggest that Democrats claims of a constitutional crisis are overwrought. In the Washington Examiner, Byron York asked, will Judge Dugan become the next hero of the resistance? Based on the facts laid out in the affidavit, prosecutors charged Dugan with an obstructing or impeding of a proceeding before a department or agency of the United States and concealing an individual to prevent his discovery and arrest, both felonies. Meanwhile, Flores Ruiz is in ICE custody. York RIP and now the politics begins. According to a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel account, as word of Dugan's arrest spread, about two dozen protesters linked arms in front of the courthouse, chanting, no justice, no peace. Let the judge be released. Some waved American flags. One protester held a sign that read only fascists arrest judges. Here's the thing. We know who the villain is. But who are Democrats going to make the hero in this story? The answer, of course, seems to be Dugan. But remember, all of this was done on behalf of Eduardo Flores Ruiz, york said. It's similar to the problem Democrats face in the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case. With that, Democrats have argued that even if Abrego Garcia is a gang member, which they still deny, the case is really about due process and everyone's rights in America. But people might still ask, why should a judge of all people obstruct federal agents and the enforcement of immigration law when, when the facts in the case seem so clear cut? In the American Spectator, David Catron wrote about Dugan's arrogant Senator Dick Durbin denounced Dugan's arrest in an overwrought statement. The Trump administration continues to test the limits of our Constitution. When immigration enforcement officials interfere with our criminal justice system, it undermines public safety, cotron wrote. Durbin is a little confused. It was Judge Dugan who interfered in our criminal justice system by personally conducting Flores Ruiz out of the courtroom through an exit outside of which she knew no federal agents would be waiting. This kind of lawlessness is not, of course, restricted to Wisconsin. On the same day Judge Dugan was taken into custody, the DOJ arrested a former Dona Ana county judge in New Mexico. Jose Luis Cano and his wife, Nancy Ann Cano, were charged with evidence tampering related to the federal investigation and prosecution against Cristian Ortega, Lopez Catron wrote. This makes two judges arrested and two judges who for all intents and purposes refuse to adhere to the oaths of their office. All four, and many more see themselves as part of the resistance. But what are they resisting? It isn't just President Trump or even the will of the people. It's the rule of law. In Fox News, Jonathan Turley said out of control judges, not FBI, appear to have crossed red line. As soon as the news of the arrest was reported, Democrats declared another constitutional crisis. Senator Amy Klobuchar added that the arrest is a drastic move threatening the rule of law and a grave step that undermines our system of checks and balances, turley wrote. That is a curious claim, unless Klobuchar believes that the officers are lying. If not, Klobuchar is suggesting that a judge should not be held accountable for actively shielding a wanted person and facilitating their evasion from law enforcement. This judge is accused of conduct that has resulted in charges for other citizens. The judicial robe is not some form of invisibility cloak that allows judges to engage in alleged criminal acts. I'm perplexed by Democrats rushing to denounce the arrest of Dugan before we know whether these allegations are supported. If she escorted the suspect to a non public door to facilitate his escape, that conduct is a shocking abandonment of judicial ethics, turley said. I have often criticized the reckless rhetoric directed against judges, including those who have ruled against the Trump administration. We need to maintain our civility and respect as we work through these often difficult questions. However, that works both ways. Judges have to reinforce respect for the judiciary in their own conduct. Alright, let's head over to Isaac for his take.
Isaac Saul
All right, that is it for what the left and the right are saying, which brings us to my take. So when news of this story first broke, I found out through a deleted and then reposted tweet by FBI Director Kash Patel. And I think, like a lot of people, my initial response was pretty reactionary. I posted on X that, quote, republicans who don't oppose this are signing up for a future Democratic president to use the FBI to arrest judges. I hope you're all ready for that. Not long after, I went on the Tango Sunday podcast with Ari, our managing editor, and Camille Foster of the Fifth Column, and we discussed the limited details we had about the arrest at the time. This was on Friday, so all three of us agreed. And we felt like some sort of Rubicon had been crossed. I mean, Trump was arresting judges. Now that was like the general tenor of our conversation on the Sunday pod that came out yesterday. In a lot of ways, it's still hard for me to shake that feeling. Trump, his attorney general, the head of the FBI, and conservative influencers. They have been threatening rogue judges, as they call them, for weeks. They've been calling to impeach judges who rule against them. They've been promising to fight back against the judiciary. And on Friday, they arrested a county judge in Wisconsin in her own courtroom. And then the criminal complaint came out. And as I read through the details provided in the affidavit, I started to feel like the case against Dugan was credible. The basic story seems to be that Judge Dugan was upset law enforcement officers were trying to arrest someone near her courtroom, so she intentionally allowed Eduardo Flores Ruiz, the defendant in a criminal case in her court, to exit through a jury door that is not typically or by some accounts, ever used for defendants, which resulted in FBI and DEA agents chasing the defendant on foot to apprehend him outside the courtroom. A few things about the criminal complaint stood out to me. First of all, FBI and DA agents regularly make arrests in public spaces at courthouses. In fact, they prefer it because they know where defendants are, that they are not armed, and that they have limited ways to evade arrest. In this case, the government says that the defendant got outside and then tried to make a run for it, which kind of validates this method and makes Judge Dugan's alleged action quite dangerous. Second, the detailed story told by FBI agent Lindsey Schlommer seems to be corroborated by several witnesses, including plainclothes agents, lawyers in the courtroom, a courtroom deputy, and a victim witness specialist. In other words, Schlommer's account is not just the account of law enforcement officers. Lastly, and somewhat tangentially, the number of people involved in arresting a single person for deportation is remarkable. We, in this affidavit and in the criminal complaint, we have at least several FBI agents, several DEA agents, several CBP agents, and several, quote, unquote, deportation officers whose agency is not identified. After reading through the whole document, I felt that there were at least open questions about Dugan's actions that warranted her arrest. I've been pretty compelled by the nobody is above the law principle, which is why I said the DOJ was right to criminally charge President Trump and why they'd also be right to pursue charges against Bill Clinton for alleged rape or George W. Bush for torture and illegal wiretapping. Wouldn't we have a better country if the powerful feared accountability? And why would that ethos apply to presidents but not a county judge? This isn't even new territory. Almost the same thing happened in 2018, an event that seven years later, I don't view as some sea change in American history, but instead has been all but forgotten. Having said that, there are still reasons that I'm concerned about Dugan's arrest. Judges have discretion over their courtroom, so she was well within her legal authority to tell ICE agents to wait in a public area outside and to ask a chief judge to determine where they can and can't make arrests, rather than sneaking him out some back door. It seems like the judge basically got him out of the building faster on a route that still had him take public hallways and was still entirely in view of the agents there to arrest him. Indeed, on paragraph 33 of the complaint, it says that explicitly, quote, after leaving the chief judge vestibule and returning to the public hallway, DEA Agent A reported that Flores Ruiz and his attorney were in the public hallway. DEA Agent B also observed Flores Ruiz and his attorney in the hallway near courtroom 6:15. At approximately 8:50am DEA Agent A alerted other members of the arrest that DEA Agent A was on the elevator with Flores Ruiz. So Flores Ruiz exited the courtroom into a public hallway where he could be legally arrested at Judge Dugan's discretion, and was then accompanied by a DEA agent in an elevator as he exited the courthouse. All this, to be clear, is in the FBI's criminal complaint without even hearing the judge's defense. This kind of undermines the idea that Dugan attempted some big secret escape that was thwarted by law enforcement. Furthermore, this practice of courtroom arrest, while safer for law enforcement, has a very obvious negative effect. It reduces the likelihood of defendants and witnesses showing up to court since they know that this is a place they could get scooped up by immigration authorities. This worsens a problem. Trump and many conservatives have articulated that migrants here illegally don't show up to court hearings. All of this leaves me feeling pretty conflicted. On the one hand, my initial reaction still feels valid. The context of what the Trump administration is doing is relevant. It's arresting a judge at a time when it is threatening the judiciary, pushing executive powers to the limits, and testing the reach of court orders. That all makes me feel pretty squeamish. It's also fair to wonder if these allegations are worth charging a judge with two felony offenses instead of referring her for judicial review, as eventually happened with a Massachusetts judge from 2018. On the other hand, if you simply asked me after reading the charging complaint, do you think Judge Dugan's conduct justifies her arrest? My answer is yes. That's not to say that she is definitely guilty. Her defense and statements from other witnesses could fully exonerate her, which is the point of due process. But it did seem like she was angry at the situation and tried to help Flores Ruiz avoid law enforcement. To my point above, being a judge should not prevent law enforcement from investigating you for wrongdoing. Lastly, some political sentiment is obviously at play. For example, imagine for a moment if Judge Dugan were someone who denied the results of the 2020 election and the defendant in question had been charged with trying to access ballot machines to help prove election fraud. Would people on the left be upset to see Dugan arrested on suspicion of helping that person avoid arrest? I doubt it. Ultimately, first impressions are a powerful thing, and I have trouble shaking the feeling that the Trump administration is intentionally escalating its tension with the judiciary, which is a game of chicken that has no good ending. But I think the only wise thing to do is reserve judgment on Dugan's guilt or innocence by waiting for more information to come out and waiting to see whether this prosecution gets pursued in earnest or at all. We'll be right back after this quick break.
Worried about what ingredients are hiding in your groceries? Let us take the guesswork out. We're Thrive Market, the online grocery store with the highest quality standards in the industry. We restrict 1000 plus ingredients so you can trust that you'll only find the best high quality organic and sustainable brands all free of the junk with savings up to 30% off and fast carbon neutral shipping. You get top trusted groceries at your door and you can stop worrying about what your kids get their hands on. Start shopping@thrivemarket.com podcast for 30% off your first order and a free gift.
Dr. Patrick McGrath
What if I told you that right now millions of people are living with a debilitating condition that's so misunderstood, many of them don't even know that they have it. That condition is Obsessive compulsive disorder, or OCD. I'm Dr. Patrick McGrath, the chief clinical officer of NOCD, and in the 25 years I've been treating OCD, I've met so many people who are suffering from the condition in silence, unaware of just what it was. OCD can create overwhelming anxiety and fear around what you value most, make you question your identity, beliefs and morals, and drive you to perform mentally and physically draining compulsions or rituals. Over my career, I've seen just how devastating OCD can be when it's left untreated. But help is available. That's where NOCD comes in. NOCD is the world's largest virtual therapy provider for obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Our licensed therapists are trained in exposure and response prevention therapy, a specialized treatment proven to be incredibly effective for OCD. So visit nocd.com to schedule a free 15 minute call with our team. That's nocd.com.
Isaac Saul
All right, that is it for my take. Today's reader question was actually directed at Ari, so we're going to bring him into the pod to answer the reader question. I'll see you guys tomorrow. Peace.
Ryan Reynolds
Thanks Isaac. So this question comes from Jeff from Henderson, Nevada who asked in the Sunday April 20th podcast. Ari threw out a common line. We are an over medicated society. Curious what specific examples he's referring to besides ADHD meds. So this question was in reference to a New York magazine article that was sweeping the Internet by storm that Isaac was talking about challenging the ways that people are thinking about ADHD medication, leading some, like me, to say we are an over medicated society. So what other examples? I'm glad you asked. Before I get into the numbers, I want to say first that I know a lot of people use genuinely transformational medications that weren't available in years and decades past. I've also personally benefited from medical innovations for all kinds of ailments, from broken bones, asthma attacks, ligament tears, and even a tumor on my small intestine when I was a kid. So I'm not anti medicine or anti science at all. However, at a population level, it's hard to believe that all the routine medication we prescribe is truly necessary in every situation. Let me start here. 65% of US adults have taken prescription medication in the past year. Not Only that, but 89% of US adults aged 65 and up have taken prescription medication in the past year, and about 40% of them take five or more prescription medications. That rate is triple what it was from 20 years ago. We take more antidepressants than our pure nations Based on CDC data from 2015 and 2018, 13% of U.S. adults had taken an antidepressant in the last month at the time of the survey, compared to 7% of Europeans across 12 months in 2015. We take more painkillers, too. The opioid use rate in the United States is 26 times higher than it is in Japan. Then there's the granddaddy of them all weight loss drugs. One in eight US adults has taken Ozempic or another GLP1 drug in the past year, and about 6% are currently prescribed one. In total, North Americans comprise 76% of the global market for GLP1 drugs. These numbers, all told, tell me that we turn to medication very quickly to solve our problems instead of exploring other methods of health care. So that's the reader question and I will send it back to John to take us out through the rest of the pod.
John Law
Thanks, Ari. Here's your under the radar story for today, folks. A New York Times investigation into the plane and helicopter crash near Reagan National Airport in January found that the pilot of the army helicopter did not heed a suggestion from her co pilot to make a left turn in the moments preceding the accident. Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Lloyd Eves, who served as the instructor on the flight, reportedly told Captain Rebecca Loback that Air Traffic Control wanted her to turn the helicopter to avoid a collision threat with the commercial airplane, but Loback did not adjust the aircraft's course. The finding adds to a series of issues with the helicopter that potentially led to the accident, including a flight path above its mandated altitude and the breakdown of radio communications between the helicopter's crew and air traffic controllers. Investigators are working to determine whether other factors may have contributed to the crash. The New York Times has this story and there's a link in today's episode Description alright, next up is our numbers section. The year Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was elected to the bench was 2016. The year Dugan's current term ends is 2028. The maximum number of years Dugan could be sentenced to serve in prison if convicted is 6. The year that Eduardo Flores Ruiz was first deported from the United States after illegally crossing the border was 2013. The approximate number of years that Flores Ruiz has been living in the United States since entering the country a second time after his first deportation is 12. The percentage of Americans who say that it is important that federal judges are impartial in deciding cases is 98%, according to an April 2025 Pew Research poll. The percentage of Americans who say they are confident that judges are impartial in deciding cases is 54%, and the percentage of Republicans and Democrats, respectively, who say that they are confident that judges are impartial in deciding cases is 54% and 55%. And last but not least, our have a nice day story A trail camera in Queensland, Australia, captured a red deer and a red fox joining each other for a moonlit stroll. The wildlife enthusiast who posted the video said it was a rare sight and that the two animals appeared to be intentionally walking together. I've had many trail cameras in this area, and I've captured hundreds of fox interactions with other foxes and animals, but I've never seen two different species just walking together like this, he said. Sunny Skies has this story in the video and there's a link in today's episode description alright everybody, that is it for today's episode. As always, if you'd like to support our work, Please go to retangle.com where you can sign up for a newsletter membership, podcast membership or a bundled membership that gets you a discount on both. We'll be right back here tomorrow. For Isaac and the rest of the crew, this is John Law signing off. Have a great day, y'all. Peace.
Isaac Saul
Our Executive editor and founder is me, Isaac Saul, and our Executive producer is John Lowell. Today's episode was edited and engineered by Dewey Thompson. Our editorial staff is led by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman with Senior Editor Will K. Back and Associate Editors Hunter Casperson, Audrey Moorhead, Bailey Saul, Lindsay Knuth and Kendall White. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet75. To learn more about Tangle and to sign up for a membership, please visit our website@retangle.com.
Paige
We had a 1200% increase in sales using TikTok ads. My name is Linda and I'm a co founder of Love and Pebble. We created Beauty Pops, a frozen facial that melts into nourishing skincare. I started this business with my husband and we do everything from packing orders, marketing. Before it was just me creating videos, but now I have over 2000 affiliates that are working with us. If we can do it with TikTok ads, you can too.
John Law
Want to grow your business fast? Head over to get started.TikTok.com TikTokads Ever.
Isaac Saul
Wonder what your lashes are destined for. The cards have spoken. Maybelline New York Mascara does it all. Whether you crave fully fan lashes with Lash sensational big bold volume from the Colossal a dramatic lift with falsies lash lift or natural looking volume from Great Lash your perfect lash future awaits. Manifest your best mascara today. Shop Maybelline New York and discover your lash destiny. Shop now at Walmart. Imagine waking up to breathtaking landscapes, vibrant culture and a welcoming community. New Zealand is calling. If you are a passionate early childhood primary or secondary school teacher, New Zealand says come teach us. With up to 10,000 New Zealand dollars in relocation support, now is the time to make your move move. Find out more about moving to New Zealand to teach@workforce.education.govt.nz open to existing qualified primary, secondary and ECE teachers. Note that this grant is only dispersed after a teacher has arrived in New Zealand and meets the other accompanying criteria.
Podcast Summary: Tangle – "The Arrest of a Wisconsin Judge"
Podcast Information:
In the April 28, 2025 episode of Tangle, host Isaac Saul delves into the high-profile arrest of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan. This episode provides a comprehensive analysis of the events leading to her arrest, the ensuing political reactions from both the left and the right, and Saul’s personal insights on the matter. The episode aims to offer listeners a nuanced understanding of the implications of this unprecedented event within the judiciary and political landscape.
John Law, the executive producer, opens the discussion by detailing the circumstances surrounding Judge Hannah Dugan's arrest. On Friday, April 25, 2025, Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Dugan was apprehended by the FBI at a courthouse. The charges against her include concealing a person from arrest and obstruction related to her alleged actions during a court appearance involving Eduardo Flores Ruiz, an undocumented immigrant facing charges of battery and domestic abuse.
Key Details:
Notable Quote:
“We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from the subject to be arrested in her courthouse,” said FBI Director Cash Patel on Twitter at [07:15].
The criminal complaint alleges that Judge Dugan attempted to expedite Flores Ruiz’s hearing and directed him to exit through a jury door, allegedly to prevent his immediate arrest by federal agents. The FBI's investigation suggests that this action facilitated Flores Ruiz’s temporary evasion of arrest, leading to charges against Judge Dugan.
The left has largely criticized the arrest, framing it as an intimidation tactic by the Trump administration aimed at undermining judicial independence.
Adam Serwer in The Atlantic argues:
“The Trump administration is sending a clear message to the judiciary... judges who anger the administration will be prosecuted at Trump's whim.” ([11:22])
Douglas Keith in Slate warns:
“ICE's policy changes... undermine the ability of judiciaries to effectively carry out their duties.” ([11:45])
Christian Farias in New York Magazine adds:
“Dugan's arrest has nothing to do with public safety. It reveals the true import of the circus.” ([12:00])
These commentators emphasize that the arrest could erode trust in the judicial system, increase tensions between federal and state authorities, and potentially discourage judges from exercising their discretion within the courtroom.
Conversely, the right has largely supported the arrest, viewing it as a necessary enforcement of the law against judges who obstruct federal authorities.
Byron York in the Washington Examiner questions:
“Why should a judge of all people obstruct federal agents and the enforcement of immigration law when the facts in the case seem so clear cut?" ([20:15])
David Catron in the American Spectator criticizes:
“When immigration enforcement officials interfere with our criminal justice system, it undermines public safety.” ([21:00])
Jonathan Turley on Fox News states:
“This judge is accused of conduct that has resulted in charges for other citizens. The judicial robe is not some form of invisibility cloak that allows judges to engage in alleged criminal acts.” ([23:30])
These perspectives assert that Judge Dugan abused her judicial authority to interfere with federal immigration enforcement, thereby compromising the rule of law and public safety.
Isaac Saul offers a balanced analysis, reflecting on personal reactions and dissecting the complexities of the case.
Initial Reaction:
“My initial response was pretty reactionary... I felt like some sort of Rubicon had been crossed. Trump was arresting judges.” ([22:30])
Saul acknowledges the historical context, referencing a similar incident in 2018 involving Massachusetts Judge Shelley Joseph, highlighting that such arrests are rare and politically charged.
Key Points:
Credibility of the Charges:
Judicial Discretion vs. Federal Enforcement:
Implications for the Judiciary:
Notable Quotes:
“Nobody is above the law principle... Wouldn't we have a better country if the powerful feared accountability?” ([24:00])
“If you simply asked me after reading the charging complaint, do you think Judge Dugan's conduct justifies her arrest? My answer is yes.” ([25:45])
Conclusion: Isaac Saul concludes that while the charges appear credible based on the available evidence, the broader context of increasing tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary cannot be ignored. He stresses the importance of reserving judgment until due process is completed but remains concerned about the potential long-term effects on judicial independence.
During the episode, John Law presents a "Numbers Section" providing relevant statistics to contextualize public perception and the gravity of the situation:
Public Opinion:
The arrest of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan marks a significant and controversial event within the American judicial and political systems. The differing reactions from the left and right underscore the deep political divides and raise important questions about judicial independence, federal enforcement powers, and the integrity of the rule of law. Isaac Saul’s balanced perspective encourages listeners to critically assess the motivations behind the arrest and its potential ramifications for the future interplay between the judiciary and executive branches.
Notable Quote by Isaac Saul:
“First impressions are a powerful thing, and I have trouble shaking the feeling that the Trump administration is intentionally escalating its tension with the judiciary.” ([26:30])
FBI Director Cash Patel on Twitter:
“We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from the subject to be arrested in her courthouse.” ([07:15])
Adam Serwer, The Atlantic:
“The Trump administration is sending a clear message to the judiciary... judges who anger the administration will be prosecuted at Trump's whim.” ([11:22])
Byron York, Washington Examiner:
“Why should a judge of all people obstruct federal agents and the enforcement of immigration law when the facts in the case seem so clear cut?" ([20:15])
Isaac Saul:
“Nobody is above the law principle... Wouldn't we have a better country if the powerful feared accountability?” ([24:00])
Jonathan Turley, Fox News:
“This judge is accused of conduct that has resulted in charges for other citizens. The judicial robe is not some form of invisibility cloak that allows judges to engage in alleged criminal acts.” ([23:30])
The Tangle podcast episode on Judge Hannah Dugan’s arrest provides a thorough exploration of a complex and politically charged issue. By presenting multiple viewpoints and deep analysis, the episode equips listeners with the necessary context and critical perspectives to form their own informed opinions on the matter.
For more in-depth analysis and exclusive content, consider becoming a Tangle member by visiting readtangle.com.