The Jay Jones texts.

Summary

---

Tangle Podcast Summary

Episode: The Jay Jones Texts
Host: Isaac Saul
Date: October 7, 2025

---

Episode Overview

This Tangle episode, hosted by Isaac Saul, dives into the controversy surrounding Jay Jones, the Democratic candidate for Virginia Attorney General, whose explicit and violent text messages about political rivals were leaked. The episode explores how the story has taken center stage, especially among conservatives, discusses reactions from across the political spectrum, and considers the broader implications for political rhetoric and standards. Isaac also shares his own perspective and answers a listener question on California's SB771 bill.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Setting the Stage: Episode Introductions & Corrections

• Date & Venue: Isaac records from Philadelphia, briefly recounting a Halloween prank in his office.

• Corrections Section ([03:00]):

  • Clarification on previous immigration reporting: the cited figure of "10 million unauthorized migrants" referenced border encounters, not unique crossings, and thus was overstated.
  • Commitment to transparency: “We track these corrections...to maximize transparency with readers.”
    — Isaac Saul ([03:40])

• Editorial Note on Israel-Gaza Conflict:

  • Tangle will not cover the October 7 anniversary in detail because it was recently discussed.

2. Main Story: The Jay Jones Texts Controversy

Basic Facts ([07:11])

• Leak Details: National Review published text exchanges from 2022 in which Jay Jones, then a Virginia House delegate, expressed extreme hostility toward Republican colleagues, including violent fantasies and wishing harm upon opponents’ children.
• Target: The texts were sent to Republican Delegate Carrie Coyner and focused on GOP House Speaker Todd Gilbert.
• Key Excerpt from Leaked Texts:
  • “[Jones] wrote about violence against GOP lawmakers and urinating on the future graves of political opponents, even killing a state GOP leader with, quote, ‘two bullets to the head.’ He also wished death upon Republican lawmakers’ children because, quote, ‘they’re breeding little fascists’ and ‘only when people feel pain personally do they move on policy.’”
    — Narrator ([07:11])

Immediate Fallout ([08:00])

• Jones’ Apology:
  • “I take full responsibility for my actions and I want to issue my deepest apology to Speaker Gilbert and his family. Reading back those words made me sick to my stomach. I am embarrassed, ashamed and sorry.”
    — Jay Jones, statement ([08:47])
• Republican Response:
  • Calls for Jones to drop out came from Virginia Republicans, Governor Glenn Youngkin, President Donald Trump, and others.
  • Conservative groups quickly tied other Democrats to Jones and pressured them to condemn the remarks.

Democratic Response

• Most Democrats denounce the texts, but few explicitly call for Jones to exit the race.
• Don Scott, Democratic House Speaker, told parishioners: “They want us to get distracted by the text message here or something else. Stay focused.” ([09:46])

---

3. Political Spectrum Breakdown

What the Left is Saying ([12:37])

• General Consensus: The texts are condemned; debate exists on severity.

• Washington Post Editorial Board:

  • “Curbing the epidemic of political violence will require leaders who do not excessively inflame routine partisan conflict...Jones’s texts cast doubt on whether he has the temperament to become the state’s top law enforcement officer.” ([13:03])
  • Criticized Jones’ initial non-apology and his attack on National Review.

• Left-wing Commentators on X:

  • Many accuse Republicans of hypocrisy; cite inflammatory rhetoric from GOP leaders.
  • “If Jay Jones has no business being lieutenant governor ... then Stephen Miller ... has no business being in government either.”
    — Rachel Bitecofer, election strategist ([13:48])
  • “It’s hard to care about J. Jones when you have a sitting president who speaks like this.”
    — Alisa Marcos, political consultant ([14:03])

What the Right is Saying ([15:00])

• Condemnation & Calls for Accountability:
  • Eric Erickson, newsletter writer:
    • “If Jones were a Republican, every major news outlet would demand GOP leaders to condemn him… And the people who hate Trump will find lots of excuses to deflect...” ([15:13])
• Wall Street Journal Editorial Board:
  • Suggests these are “disqualifying sentiments” for an aspiring AG and says Jones should step aside. ([16:13])

What Virginia Writers are Saying ([16:35])

• Robert B. Mitchell, Any Damn Thing newsletter:
  • “There is simply no legitimate place for this kind of language, and any politician who indulges in it deserves public condemnation... The most responsible thing [Jones] can do now is quit the race.” ([17:09])
• Dwayne Yancey, Cardinal News:
  • Explores whether the scandal is politically fatal, noting Jones lacks the ability to redeem himself through public office actions as Northam did. ([17:52])

---

4. Isaac Saul’s Take ([19:49])

• Empathy for Multiple Viewpoints:
  • Reflects on conservative Guy Benson’s call for liberals to understand right-wing fears amid recent political violence.
  • “[Benson] asked those on the left to consider that...conservatives were seeing...a major statewide candidate had sent these death wish text messages about a political rival.” ([20:17])
• Broader Social Context:
  • “Benson's exercise was a genuine reminder that right now, fear is just everywhere…Everyone is afraid for different reasons.” ([21:37])
• Setting a Red Line:
  • Argues both parties should enforce: “Endorse political violence and you’re done.”
  • “Here we have a powerful and easy centralizing idea that could be seized for the endorse political violence and you're done.” ([22:20])
• Why Jones Should Drop Out:
  • Jones’ texts are “genuinely obscene” and “disqualifying,” especially for a high moral office.
  • Stresses the upside for Democrats in taking "genuine moral high ground" by ousting Jones.
  • “Someone who would send a text like this should be nowhere near the Attorney General’s office.” ([23:13])
• On Standards:
  • Urges consistent condemnation of political violence across the spectrum, whether it comes from Trump allies (e.g., Rep. Clay Higgins) or left-wing activists.
  • “Let’s make it unacceptable not just to commit political violence, but political poison to endorse or incite it.” ([25:47])

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• Jay Jones Statement ([08:47]):
  “I am embarrassed, ashamed and sorry. This was a grave mistake and I will work every day to prove to the people of Virginia that I will fight for them as attorney general.”
• Washington Post Editorial Board ([13:03]):
  “Gentility is the Virginia way. His texts were the opposite of that.”
• Eric Erickson ([15:13]):
  “And the people who hate Trump will find lots of excuses to deflect, scream both sides and do everything possible to avoid condemning the man whom Democrats think is fit for Attorney General of Virginia.”
• Isaac Saul’s Principle ([22:20]):
  “He offers a chance to collectively set and enforce a new red line. Jones should drop out of this race. Agreeing with this sentiment is a tremendous opportunity.”
• Isaac Saul on Consistency ([25:47]):
  “Let’s make it unacceptable not just to commit political violence, but political poison to endorse or incite it. And then let’s enforce that standard for everyone.”

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [02:26] – Episode Opening & Corrections
• [07:11] – The Jay Jones Texts: Summary & Fallout
• [12:37] – Political Spectrum Analysis: What the Left & Right Are Saying
• [16:35] – Virginia Writers’ Perspectives
• [19:49] – Isaac Saul’s Personal Take
• [27:39] – Listener Questions: CA Bill SB771 Explained
• [30:23] – Under-the-Radar Story & Notable Numbers

---

Listener Question: California SB771 ([27:39])

Is SB771 law? Does it fine users $500,000+ for 'hateful' posts? Is this censorship?

• SB771 has passed the California legislature but not enacted yet—awaiting Gov. Newsom’s signature.
• Fines (up to $1 million) target platforms, not individual users, for algorithmic sharing of content that constitutes criminal violence or intimidation.
• Censorship? Many say yes, as it coerces platforms to restrict speech, but the bill doesn't criminalize direct user speech. The definition of “hateful” remains a contested gray area.

---

Closing Thoughts

• The Jones scandal is a flashpoint for debates about political rhetoric, accountability, and the normalization of violent language in politics.
• Isaac and the Tangle team urge parties on both sides to take a principled stand against any endorsement of political violence—publicly or privately.

---

For more on this story and others, visit readtangle.com.

---

Transcript

[Meundies Advertiser]

This Halloween. What's under your costume might just steal the show.

Wait, is that Glow in the Dark underwear?

Boo. Yeah. Meundies has dropped their spookiest collection yet. Glow in the dark undies and PJs. So comfy it's scary.

Tricks, treats and buttery soft briefs.

Exactly. To get cozy and spook you for less, go to Meundies.com Trickortreat and enter code trickortreat to get 20% off your first order. That's 20% off your first order at Meundies.com Trick or Treat code Trick or Treat Meundies Treat yourself. If your dog could talk, they'd beg for Ollie. The full body tail wag, the excited little hops, the big goofy grin. That's the Ollie effect. Ollie delivers clean, fresh nutrition in five drool worthy flavors, even for the pickiest eaters. Made in US Kitchens with high quality human grade ingredients, Ollie's food contains no fillers, no preservatives, just real food. Just fill out Ollie's 32nd quiz and they'll create a customized meal plan based on your pup's weight, activity level and other health info. Dogs deserve the best and that means fresh, healthy food. Head to ollie.com healthypup Tell them about your dog and use code HEALTHYPUP to get 60% off your welcome kit when you subscribe today. Plus they offer a happiness guarantee on the first box, so if you're not completely satisfied, you'll get your money back. That's o l l I e.com healthypup and enter code healthypup to get 60% off your you've worked hard to build your business.

SimpliSafe helps you protect it with SimpliSafe for business. AI powered cameras watch over your entry points and instantly alert live monitoring agents. They can deter intruders before they get inside. It's protection built for growing companies. 24. Seven monitoring, no contracts and a 60 day money back guarantee. To get 50% off your new system, go to SimpliSafe.com podcast that's SimpliSafe.com podcast for 50% off. There's no safe like Simplisafe.

[John Law]

Foreign.

[Meundies Advertiser]

Executive producer Isaac Saul, this is Tangle.

[Isaac Saul]

Good morning, good afternoon and good evening and welcome to the Tangle Podcast. A place we get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking and a little bit of my take. I'm your host, Isaac Soul. It is Tuesday, October 7th. I'm here in my Philadelphia office. I just walked in my office in Philadelphia and somebody in this building put this terrifying three foot tall demonic woman Halloween decoration in my office and successfully scared me. And I'm not a jumpy person, but I opened the door, turned on the light and was being stared at by this horrifying Halloween costume and it got me. And now she's just sitting here watching me record the pod. So I'm going to do it in front of my tormentor. We've got a good one today. This is a story that has been really animating the right. In particular, it is the story about Jay Jones, the candidate for Attorney General in Virginia who had some very unsavory text messages release. We're going to talk about exactly what happened. I have a couple things to do here at the top before we jump in though. First of all, I have a correction from yesterday. We wrote and I read here on the podcast that over 10 million unauthorized migrants entered the country under Biden. While Democratic leaders told us the border was secure, the statistic that claim was based on was the number of encounters at the border, not crossings. I write a lot about immigration, so I understand the distinction. Encounters includes more people than border crossers. Those who did cross the border sometimes do so repeatedly. Not all of those who enter the U.S. legally remain here. I was linking back to a previous argument I had made from a newsletter a few months ago, and the link to the section of that newsletter had all that context about what encounters me and whatever yesterday's newsletter and podcast did not. So it was an inaccurate thing to say. A frustrating correction. This is our 145th correction in our 322 week history and our first correction since September 18th. We track these corrections and we place them at the top of our podcast and our newsletter in an effort to maximize transparency with readers. That's one. Number two, today's October 7th. It's the anniversary of the October 7th attacks in Israel that launched the region into its largest conflict in decades. I think a lot of news organizations are going to be covering the anniversary today, the two year anniversary of the war. We're not. I just wanted to say at the top why we just covered the war in Gaza last week. There's obviously these ceasefire negotiations. My fingers personally are crossed because I want a ceasefire. But we're not going to dedicate a whole issue to it today because we just gave it a bunch of coverage last week. So if you'd like, there's a link in today's episode description. You can go find all our coverage of the war in Gaza. I also highlighted in the newsletter today that there are a number of pieces that we've done that have kind of broken through my interview with Haviv Radegur. Our first piece after October 7th and the piece that I wrote where I'm questioning my Zionism. All of those are in today's episode description. If you'd like to check them out with that, I'm gonna send it over to John for today's main topic and I'll be back for my.

[John Law]

Thanks, Isaac, and welcome everybody. Here are your quick hits for today. First up, a federal judge declined to immediately block National Guard troops from mobilizing to Chicago after Illinois and Chicago sued the Trump administration to stop the deployment. Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for Thursday. Number two, the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal on the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20 year sentence for sex trafficking and other crimes related to her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Number three, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officially adopted a set of recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, updating its adult and child immunization schedules and recommendations for COVID 19 vaccines. Number four, Ukraine said that it struck the Feodosia oil terminal, one of Russia's main factories producing explosives for a wide variety of munitions. At number five, Treasury Secretary Scott Besant announced the appointment of Frank Bisignano, who also serves as commissioner of the Social Security Administration, as chief executive officer of the Internal Revenue Service.

[Narrator for Jay Jones story]

The Democratic candidate running to be Virginia's attorney general facing brutal backlash this morning after his vile text messages with another state lawmaker were exposed. Democrat Jay Jones wrote about violence against GOP lawmakers and urinating on the future graves of political opponents, even killing a state GOP leader with, quote, two bullets to the head. He also wished death upon the Republican lawmakers children because, quote, they're breeding little fascists and quote, only when people feel pain personally do they move on policy.

[John Law]

On Friday, National Review published text messages from former Virginia House of Delegates member Jay Jones sent to a Republican colleague, House Delegate Kerry Coyner, in 2022. In the messages, Jones expresses disdain for Virginia House Speaker Todd Gilbert, then says he would shoot Gilbert in a hypothetical scen where he could kill either him or dictators Pol Pot and Adolf Hitler. Jones went on to suggest that he wanted Gilbert's children to die from gun violence because it might prompt the speaker to change his stance on gun control. The messages, which Jones has apologized for, drew strong rebukes from local and national Republicans, many of whom have called for Jones to drop out of the race for Virginia attorney general. The controversy has also resurfaced discussions about political violence following conservative activist Charlie Kirk's assassination in September. You can read the released text messages with the link in today's episode description. In a statement on Friday, Jones said, I take full responsibility for my actions and I want to issue my deepest apology to Speaker Gilbert and his family. Reading back those words made me sick to my stomach. I am embarrassed, ashamed and sorry. He added, this was a grave mistake and I will work every day to prove to the people of Virginia that I will fight for them as attorney general. In the days following the report, Republicans and conservative influencers said Jones should drop out of the race and pressured Democrats to condemn his messages. Virginia gubernatorial candidate Republican winsome Earl Sears released an ad linking her Democratic opponent, former Representative Abigail Spamberger, to Jones, while Virginia governor Republican Glenn Youngkin said the texts were disqualifying and criticized state Democrats for their response. President Donald Trump also commented on the controversy, posting on Truth Social that Jones's texts were sick and demented and saying he should immediately drop from the race. While Virginia Democrats have denounced the texts, few have called for Jones to exit the race. In a statement, Spamberger said she spoke frankly with Jay about my disgust with what he had said and texted. I made clear to Jay that he must fully take responsibility for his words but did not weigh in on his future as a candidate. Several other state and national Democrats condemned the text in similar terms. However, on Sunday, Virginia House Speaker Democrat Don Scott suggested that voters should not be distracted by the story telling parishioners at a local church that they want us to get distracted by the text message here or something else. Stay focused. Today we'll break down the text message controversy with views from the left, right and writers in Virginia. And then Isaac's take.

[Isaac Saul]

We'll be right back after this quick break. As the weather cools, I'm swapping in the pieces that actually get the job done. Warm, durable and built to last. And Quince delivers every time with wardrobe staples that carry you through the season. Quince has the kind of fall staples you'll actually want to wear on repeat, like 100% Mongolian cashmere from just $60. Classic fit, denim and real leather and wool outerwear that looks sharp and holds up. I just spent a full summer wearing nothing but Quint's clothing. You can ask my wife because she keeps complimenting me for successfully dressing myself and now I gotta restock for the fall with some warm wear so I personally can attest that if you're trying to look sharp, save a little bit of money and buy from a brand that has some ethical practices. Quince is a good way to go. Layer up this fall with pieces that feel as good as they look. Go to quince.comtangle for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's Q-U-I-N c-e.comtangle free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.comtangle if you're like me, instead of learning to skateboard, you wish you were learning to write code. Instead of scraping through college, you wish you bought Bitcoin at less than a cent or secured a few Nvidia shares before they boomed. We might beat the FOMO generation, but don't miss out on protecting your future. For around the same price per month as one of your streaming services, you can break our generational cycle and secure your and your family's future by finding life [e-mail] if you're new to life insurance or it's your first time hearing about the idea, you're not alone. I found Selectquote and for over 40 years, SelectQuote has helped more than 2 million Americans understand their options and get the coverage they need. Over $700 billion in coverage and counting. The good news is life insurance is never cheaper than it is today. Get the right life insurance for you for less and save more than [e-mail] tangle save more than 50% on term life [e-mail] tangle today to get started, that's SelectQuote.com tangle.

[John Law]

All right, first, let's start with some agreement. Most commentators on the left and the right condemn Jones's text and say they were inexcusable. And now for what the left is saying. The left mostly rebukes the texts, and some call on Jones to drop out. Others say the outrage from Republicans is hypocritical, The Washington Post editorial board wrote about J. Jones and political violence. Curbing the epidemic of political violence will require leaders who do not excessively inflame routine partisan conflict. But text messages that Jay Jones, the Democratic nominee for Virginia attorney general, sent to a GOP legislator, which emerged Friday afternoon, cast doubt on whether he has the temperament to become the state's top law enforcement enforcement officer, the board said. Jones on Friday initially issued a statement that maligned National Review as a Trump controlled media organization peddling smears. He offered no apology. Former Congresswoman Abigail Spamberger, the candidate for governor, said she spoke frankly with Jay about my disgust and made clear that he must take full responsibility for his words, the board wrote. The commonwealth has a proud tradition of elevating sensible politicians from both parties. Gentility is the Virginia way. His texts were the opposite of that. Jones has a month to convince voters that his hateful rhetoric does not reflect how he'd behave if elected Attorney General on X. Several commentators on the left suggested that the response to the texts was overblown compared to Republicans rhetoric. Election strategist Rachel Bittacoffer shared a video of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller speaking at Charlie Kirk's memorial and wrote, dear Maga, if Jay Jones has no business being lieutenant governor of Virginia for making crude comments about political violence, then Stephen Miller, a taxpayer funded White House special advisor, has no business being in government either. Political consultant Alisa Marcos shared a video of President Trump addressing the Navy on Sunday and wrote, it's hard to care about J. Jones when you have a sitting president who speaks like this. Former Arlington County Chief Public Defender Brad Haywood wrote, the irony of all this premeditated manufactured outrage is that the more Trump's disciples lose their minds over it, the crazier the conclusions they draw and the more dire their remedies they posit, the clearer it becomes that J. Jones must win in November. Alright, that is it for what the left is saying. Which brings us to what the right is saying. The right condemns Jones, texts and criticizes Democrats for the muted response. Many call on Jones to exit the race. In his newsletter, Eric Erickson criticized Democrats, but Trump responds to the texts. If Jones were a Republican, every major news outlet in America would demand to know what the congressional Republicans think. A few years ago, a local public official who happened to be a Republican made a racist remark, and national reporters were on Capitol Hill demanding that Republican senators and congressmen denounced the man none of them had ever heard of, erickson wrote. After two assassination attempts on Donald Trump, a progressive killed Charlie Kirk for his political views and a Democrat attorney general candidate called for the assassination of a politician and the murder of his children. Democrats and the Bulwark crowd stay silent. Jay Jones, in a private text message so not public hyperbole, but a private conversation expressing candid thoughts, said he hoped the former speaker, Todd Gilbert, should have his wife watch their children die in her arms so that Todd Gilbert might reconsider his political views, erickson said. And the people who hate Trump will find lots of excuses to deflect, scream both sides and do everything possible to avoid condemning the man whom Democrats think is fit for Attorney General of Virginia the Wall Street Journal editorial board asked, will Jones withdraw? Does politics still recognize such a thing as a career ending scandal? J. Jones is the Democratic nominee for Virginia attorney general. The question is whether he will remain that for long. After reports on a shocking series of text messages he sent in 2020, two months after he resigned a state legislative seat, the board wrote, the lawmaker who was sent these messages pushed back, writing that Jones had made a comment on the phone about hoping Mr. Gilbert's children died. Yes, I've told you this before, Mr. Jones replied. Only when people feel pain personally do they move on policy. These ought to be disqualifying sentiments from someone hoping to be Virginia's top law enforcer. Reading back those words made me sick to my stomach, Mr. Jones said. I have reached out to Speaker Gilbert to apologize to him directly, his wife, Jennifer, and their children. He said he can't take back his words, but he can take full accountability. That would mean stepping aside. All right, that is it for what the left and the right are saying. Which brings us to what writers in Virginia are saying. Some Virginia writers say Jones remaining in the race imperils other Democratic candidates. Others suggest that Jones candidacy may not be dead in the water. In his Any Damn Thing newsletter, Robert B. Mitchell argued Jones must drop out of the race for AG at a time when Americans crave sanity in government. The Democratic ticket in Virginia features a stark contrast between mature leadership and the incendiary rhetoric that is poisoning our politics, mitchell wrote. Former Representative Spamberger is poised to deliver an early and welcome rebuke to the dangerous and venomous conduct of President Donald Trump, which could foreshadow a winning formula for Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. She deserves to be elected governor. And then there is Gerald J. Jones, the Democratic candidate for attorney general. We could not have politicians, no matter their party, spewing toxic rhetoric about their opponents in public as Trump does with some frequency, or in private, as Jones did. There is simply no legitimate place for this kind of language, and any politician who indulges in it deserves public condemnation, mitchell said. A Spanberger victory in the fall would represent a rejection of Trump's divisive and dangerous rhetoric. She projects responsibility. As for Jones, the most responsible thing he can do now is quit the race. In Cardinal News, Dwayne Yancey explored the political impact of the texts. Is this a fatal blow for Jones? There are two competing forces at play. We're in a partisan era where there's less ticket splitting. We haven't had a split result in Virginia in 20 years. On the other hand, in the polls that have asked about the lower ballot races, the attorney general's contest has been much closer than the top of the ticket, yancey wrote. Jones has devoted his campaign to tying Miaras to President Trump. Will voter antipathy toward Trump outweigh however voters feel about Jones texts? If voters don't seem concerned and aren't moved at all by Republican ads that are now coming, then Jones is clear. If voters instantly make up their minds that Jones isn't fit for office, there may be nothing he can do, yancy said. When the infamous blackface photo on then governor Ralph Northam's medical school yearbook was revealed, Northam had the means with which to show he wasn't a racist. He made a point of supporting lots of legislation of interest to black Virginians. Jones isn't in office, so he doesn't have that opportunity. All right, let's head over to Isaac for his take.

[Isaac Saul]

Alright, that is it for the left and the writer saying, which brings us to my take. So one of my favorite conservative pundits is Guy Benson. Benson writes for publications like Town hall and Fox News. He's built up a loyal following over the years while generally keeping it pretty classy. While he's established his conservative bona fides, I suspect Benson has also lost friends within his own ranks. He hasn't been shy about criticizing Republican politicians, including Trump, when he thinks they deserve it. And he came out as gay in 2015 when homosexuality was still gaining acceptance among Republicans. Given this track record, I think he has a particular kind of political depth and empathy that I think helps him see clearly. He's somebody who I trust to give, you know, fair, honest assessments of the news. And over the weekend I saw Benson post this thread on X and he was explaining a sentiment among his conservative friends to his liberal followers. He asked those on the left to consider that only a few weeks removed from Charlie Kirk's assassination, conservatives were seeing in the news, among other things, that a major statewide candidate had sent these death wish text messages about a political rival. A Biden appointed judge had handed down a lenient sentence to the person who tried to kill Brett Kavanaugh, and that New York University's law school shut down an event that commemorating the October 7th massacre because they were worried about the security situation. And yet, Benson wrote, we see many of our leftist friends tweeting and posting about how their opponents are the dangerous and authoritarian fascists. I ask you to try to contemplate, even for a quiet moment or two, how this might strike many of us. I often find myself agreeing with Benson, but I get the feeling he's following a thread of political extremism that is less common than he thinks. Here I am quite obviously deeply concerned about political violence, and I'm still deeply shaken by Charlie Kirk's murder. Yet his post felt like an implication that the left is the actual authoritarian, fascist side of the political aisle. Right now, personally, I'm much more worried about the president and the federal government's current power, responding to Kirk's shooting with some of his most divisive rhetoric yet, declaring war on U.S. cities and collecting extreme levels of power in the executive branch. When I weigh that kind of force against college protesters pressuring their university to shut down an event, or a former state delegate running for attorney general in Virginia, I have a hard time feeling like the two are equal in weight. Even with that initial reaction, I still found myself moved by Benson's call for a perspective shift. So I did what he suggested and meditated on what this moment is like for people of all political stripes right now, not just my moderate or near the middle kin. Benson's exercise was a genuine reminder that right now, fear is just everywhere. People like me fear the degradation of our constitutional norms and the lethargy of our courts. People to the left of me fear a slide towards fascism and Trump cracking down on liberal institutions, and people to the right of me fear political violence from the left and the way it is ignored or dismissed by courts and the mainstream media. And in all of this, in this, everyone is afraid for different reasons. Moment Jay Jones presents an opportunity. He offers a chance to collectively set and enforce a new red line. Jones should drop out of this race. Agreeing with this sentiment is a tremendous opportunity. Every time a new unstable person commits an act of political violence or some politician sets a new standard for obscenity, all we do is paint their whole party in that person's colors and lower the bar for what we tolerate in our allies who oppose them. Yet here we have a powerful and easy centralizing idea that could be seized for the endorse political violence and you're done. If you're a Republican. The reasoning is simple. Jones messages are genuinely obscene, and I doubt many conservatives believe they are anything short of disqualifying. Of course, it's possible Republicans waited to release the messages until now for optimal political benefit. When Jones dropping out comes with the political advantage of removing an opponent 30 days from a competitive election in Virginia, all of that makes it easier for conservatives to support. He's dropping out, but he still should. Democrats, meanwhile, seem to be hedging on whether they're going to coalesce around a call for Jones to drop out. But why not enforce this red line? The stakes for the party nationally aren't even that high. We're talking about a Virginia attorney general race from a strictly principled perspective. Someone who would send a text like this should be nowhere near the Attorney general's office, functioning as an arbiter of morality and criminal prosecution. The upside, meanwhile, is taking a genuine moral high ground, even if you're cynical enough to think the right would never do the same. The candidate in question is now so politically toxic, he might just lose anyway. Why not cut bait and be able to say, this is the new standard? If you promote political violence, you're out? That's not to say it doesn't matter if Republicans don't respond in kind. They should. That means when Representative Clay Higgins, the Republican from Louisiana, talks about dropping protesters where they stand, he should get condemned and censured. That means when we find out an employee at the Justice Department called on a mob to kill cops, we fire them. That means when Valentina Gomez, a candidate for Congress, uploads campaign videos of herself executing migrants for coming here illegally, she is disqualified and widely panned. How many more opportunities will we get to unify around a message that says political violence, even in private messages, is a taboo? So off limits it means you can't run for office? Probably not many, given everything our country has experienced over the last few years. Two presidential assassination attempts, the murder of a Minnesota state representative, the killing of a healthcare executive, arson at the Pennsylvania governor's mansion, the assassination of Charlie Kirk. We must take advantage of the opportunity and say no more. Let's make it unacceptable not just to commit political violence, but political poison to endorse or incite it. And then let's enforce that standard for everyone. We'll be right back after this quick break.

[Meundies Advertiser]

This Halloween, what's under your costume? Might just steal the show.

Wait, is that Glow in the Dark underwear?

Booyah. Meundies has dropped their spookiest collection yet. Glow in the dark undies and PJs. So comfy it's scary.

Tricks, treats, and buttery soft briefs.

Exactly. To get cozy and spooky for less, go to Meundies.com trick or treat and enter code trickortreat to get 20% off your first order. That's 20% off your first order at Meundies.com trick or Treat code Trick or treat. Meundies. Treat yourself.

[World Courier Testimonial Speaker]

Carol you're in remission. I think what gets me most about this whole journey that I've been through is just how many jigsaw pieces come together to help someone like me. I've met people who have just packaged the drugs, just this white box saying World Courier on it. But I want to better say thank you to every single person that works on these things because they've saved my life. Every single one of them.

[John Law]

Every minute World Courier makes another life changing delivery. Learn More Search World Courier.

[Isaac Saul]

All right, that is it for my take. Which brings us to your questions answered. This one's from Shannon in Florida Shannon said, is California SB771 passed and does it say that if the state deems a post hateful, you can be charged $500,000 or more? And if so, why is this not being considered censorship? Okay, I'm going to take those questions in order. First, California State Bill SB771 has not been passed into law yet. Though it has cleared both chambers of the state Legislature, it is currently awaiting Governor Gavin Newsom's signature to be enacted. SB771 is aimed at hateful speech online, and it does authorize fines of up to $500,000 for a reckless violation of the law and up to $1 million for an intentional knowing or willful violation. But a few details differentiate it from the way you pose the question here. First, the bill references existing California CRIM that prohibits, quote, all persons and entities, including corporations, from engaging in aiding, abetting, or conspiring to commit acts of violence, intimidation, or coercion based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, or other protected characteristics. The preamble uses the word hate three times, particularly against lgbtq, Arab and Jewish people, but it does not define punishable content as hateful. Second, the bill does not regulate posts from social media users themselves, but the content that social media platforms share with or promote to others. As the text of the proposed law states, the regulation applies specifically to a social media platform that violates existing criminal code through its algorithms that relay content to users. If the bill is signed, the platform, not users, would face fines of up to $1 million. Third, the state would not be surveilling post itself. An aggrieved party has to bring a civil suit, and a judge would then determine if it represents a violation and award a penalty. Though yes, the judge would be an agent of the state. Here to your last question. Many places do consider the bill to be censorship because it would coerce a third party, social media platforms, to restrict user speech organizations from fire to the American Arab Anti Discrimination Committee condemn SB771 on these grounds and call on Governor Newsom to veto it. However, even if the bill becomes law, the state would not be directly punishing people for their speech, which keeps the issue of how to characterize the bill firmly in a gray area. All right, that is it for my take and your questions answered. I'm gonna send it back to John for the rest of the pod. I'll see you guys tomorrow. Have a good one. Peace.

[John Law]

Thanks, Isaac. Here's your under the radar story for today, folks. On Saturday, Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein's South Carolina home burned down, three people were injured and some occupants of the house had to jump out of windows to escape. In September, Goodstein temporarily blocked the South Carolina Election Commission from releasing voter files to the Justice Department in a ruling against the Trump administration, and some speculated that the fire could have been a targeted attack. However, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division Chief Mark Keel said on Monday that there was no immediate evidence that the fire was intentional, though the investigation is still active and ongoing. The Associated Press has this story and there's a link in today's episode Description alright, next up is our numbers section. The approximate number of years that J. Jones served in the Virginia House of delegates is 3. According to a September 2025 Washington Post scar school poll, 48% of registered Virginia voters said they would support Jay Jones in November's election for Virginia Attorney General. 53% of registered Virginia voters said that they would support Democratic nominee Abigail Spamberger in November's election for Virginia governor, while 40% said that they would support the Republican nominee, winsome Earl Sears. The percentage of registered Virginia voters who said economy, cost of living, jobs, housing is the most important issue in their choice for Virginia governor is 19%, the highest response of any issue polled. The percentage of registered Virginia voters who said that anti Republican, Trump, MAGA or pro Democrat is the most important issue and their choice for Virginia governor is 12%, the second highest response of any issue polled. And the percentage of registered Virginia voters who said pro Republican, anti Democratic is the most important issue and their choice for Virginia governor is 7%, the seventh highest response of any issue polled. And last but not least, our have a nice day story in the category of nameless and unstudied species scientists call dark taxa insects abound. An estimated four out of five insect species have never been formally identified due to their size, subterranean habitats, and the visual similarity between species. However, a host of new technologies are helping researchers track distinctions faster and at higher resolutions than ever before. One team at the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research feeds drone collected data into machine learning software to encode and describe insect DNA. We know a lot more about what's happening, even if a lot still escapes, us, environmental scientist and WSL team member Camille Albuy said. The Atlantic has this story, and there's a link in today's Episode description All right everybody, that is it for today's episode. As always, if you'd like to support our work, Please go to retangle.com where you can sign up for a newsletter membership, podcast membership or a bundled membership that gets you a discount on both. We'll be right back here tomorrow. For Isaac and the rest of the crew, this is John Law signing off. Have a great day, y'. All. Peace.

[Isaac Saul]

Our Executive editor and founder is me, Isaac Saul, and our Executive producer is John Lowell. Today's Episode episode was edited and engineered by Dewey Thomas. Our editorial staff is led by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman with Senior Editor Will K. Back and Associate Editors Hunter Casperson, Audrey Moorhead Bailey Saw Lindsay Knuth and Kendall White. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet75. To learn more about Tangle and to sign up for a membership, please visit our [e-mail].

[Meundies Advertiser]

This Halloween, what's under your costume might just steal the show.

Wait, is that Glow in the Dark underwear?

Boo. Yeah. Meundies has dropped their spookiest collection yet. Glow in the dark undies and PJs. So comfy it's scary.

Tricks treats in Buttery soft briefs.

Exactly. To get cozy and spook you for less, go to Meundies.com trick or treat and enter Code Trick or treat to get 20% off your first order. That's 20% off your first order at MeUndies.com trickortreat code trickortreat MeUndies Treat Yourself.

[Narrator for Jay Jones story]

We all love our pets, but we love to travel too, and sadly, they can't always come along for the ride. Don't stress. Trusted House Sitters connects you with verified sitters who will stay in your home and care for your pets, all in exchange for a place to stay on their travels. So while you're off exploring, your pets get to stay safe and happy at home, right where they belong. Find a loving in Home pet sitter.

[Meundies Advertiser]

[e-mail] the youth mental health crisis is growing and social media is a major driver. Kids are spending up to 9 hours a on screens, often unsupervised, and studies show a direct link to anxiety, depression, and even suicidal thoughts. That's where Gab comes in. Gab offers safe phones and watches with no Internet or social media. Just the right tech at the right time. From smart watches for young kids to advanced parent managed phones for teens, Gab keeps kids connected safely. Visit gab.com getgab and use code getgab for a special offer that's G-A-B-B.com getgab Gab tech insteps independence for them, peace of mind for parents.