Tangle Podcast Episode: The Matt Gaetz Ethics Report Host: Isaac Saul | Release Date: November 21, 2024

Introduction

In this episode of Tangle, host Isaac Saul delves into the contentious issue surrounding former Representative Matt Gaetz's nomination for Attorney General and the accompanying ethics report under scrutiny in Congress. The discussion is enriched with diverse viewpoints from across the political spectrum, insightful analysis, and culminates with audience questions.

News Overview: Matt Gaetz's Withdrawal and Ethics Report

The episode begins with a critical update: Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination for Attorney General shortly after the release of a federal ethics report. This development comes amid increasing pressure and scrutiny within Congress.

• Isaac Saul (01:39): "We're going to be talking about Matt Gaetz's appointment to be Attorney General and the ethics report that is now being wrestled over in Congress."

Key points covered include:

• A bipartisan House ethics panel had been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against Gaetz.
• The committee decided not to release the report following Gaetz’s resignation, adhering to tradition unless in exceptional circumstances.
• Representative Susan Wild, the top Democrat on the committee, is pushing for the report's release, citing historical precedents where ethics reports were made public even after a member's resignation.

Left's Perspective on the Ethics Report

The left criticizes the committee’s decision to withhold the ethics report, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability, especially for someone nominated to be the nation's top law enforcement official.

• The Washington Post Editorial Board (06:00): "The ethics report shouldn't be a secret. The committee, which meets again next month, needs to release the material well before the Senate considers Mr. Gates nomination for attorney general."

Key arguments include:

• Historical instances where ethics reports were released post-resignation, reinforcing the call for Gaetz's report to follow suit.
• Concerns that withholding the report undermines public trust and deviates from established norms.
• The potential for the report to influence Gates's confirmation process, ensuring that only qualified and ethical individuals hold significant government positions.

Right's Perspective on the Ethics Report

The right exhibits a mixed response, balancing the Senate’s right to transparency with the defense of Gaetz's character. Some argue for the necessity of releasing the report to uphold ethical standards, while others defend Gaetz against what they perceive as politically motivated attacks.

• The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board (11:06): "Mr. Gates has denied wrongdoing, and he deserves due process like everyone else."

Key points include:

• Recognition that the Senate has a legitimate interest in reviewing the ethics report to assess Gates's suitability.
• Criticism of attempts to derail Gates's nomination through potential leaks and political maneuvering.
• Emphasis on due process and the necessity for the Ethics Committee to uphold its responsibilities transparently.

Isaac Saul's Analysis

Isaac Saul provides a nuanced perspective, acknowledging the complexities of the situation while advocating for transparency and accountability.

• Isaac Saul (19:15): "Mark Wayne Mullen, the Republican from Oklahoma, is at best a maybe Senator. Lisa Murkowski, the Republican from Alaska, called Gates not a serious nomination. And Susan Collins, the Republican from Maine, said she was, quote, shocked at the nomination."

Key insights include:

• Highlighting the lack of conclusive evidence against Gaetz, noting the Department of Justice's decision not to press charges due to witness credibility issues.
• Critiquing President Trump's unwavering support for Gaetz despite mounting reservations within the GOP.
• Stressing the importance of the Ethics Committee releasing the report to inform the Senate's decision, thereby ensuring that Gates’s nomination is thoroughly vetted.

Q&A Segment: Audience Questions

Isaac addresses a listener's question about Charlie Kirk, evaluating his influence and debating style within political discourse.

• Listener Eric from Holly Springs, North Carolina (26:09): "What do you think of Charlie Kirk?"
• Isaac Saul (26:09): "I just find his brand of entertainment politics pretty annoying... But I think he's smart, influential, doing the right thing to get the outcome he wants."

Key points discussed:

• Respect for Kirk’s efforts in engaging young voters but criticism of his confrontational debate style.
• Recognition of Kirk’s effectiveness in promoting Trumpism among college-aged Americans.
• Personal opinion on the polarizing nature of his approach, despite acknowledging his impact.

Conclusion

The episode wraps up with a preview of upcoming content and a call to action for listeners to support the podcast. Isaac emphasizes the significance of the Ethics Committee’s forthcoming decisions and the broader implications for political accountability.

• Isaac Saul (32:10): "The point of the Ethics Committee isn't to prosecute our elected representatives. The point is to hold members of Congress responsible for their actions in front of their peers."

Final thoughts highlight the necessity for responsible information dissemination and the potential consequences of the Ethics Committee's actions on Gates's nomination and Republican integrity.

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Isaac Saul (01:39): "We're going to be talking about Matt Gaetz's appointment to be Attorney General and the ethics report that is now being wrestled over in Congress."
• The Washington Post Editorial Board (06:00): "The ethics report shouldn't be a secret."
• The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board (11:06): "Mr. Gates has denied wrongdoing, and he deserves due process like everyone else."
• Isaac Saul (19:15): "It's just to say that I want to see the output of two years of investigation."
• Isaac Saul (26:09): "People like Ben Shapiro popularized this on the right... On the left, you see it in the form of Daily show man on the street bits."

Final Thoughts

This episode of Tangle offers a comprehensive examination of the Matt Gaetz ethics report and its implications for his nomination as Attorney General. Through balanced discourse, the podcast sheds light on the intricate dynamics of political accountability, ethical standards, and the influence of partisan perspectives in shaping governmental integrity.

For more in-depth analysis and diverse political discussions, subscribe to Tangle and explore our newsletter.