Will Kbach (21:14)
Thanks, John. Hey everyone, it's Will jumping back in here to read my take. The alleged crimes in these cases are shocking and infuriating. This isn't just one fraud case. It's several. And it isn't just a handful of bad actors. It's dozens. It isn't just a low grade ripoff. It's over $100 billion that's allegedly been stolen. Perhaps worst of all, these weren't just any government funds either. They were earmarked to help Minnesota's most vulnerable people, children, the elderly, the homeless, and people with disabilities. We don't need to beat around the bush. These fraud cases have put a harsh spotlight on the Somali community in my home state of Minnesota and prompted some difficult questions about whether that community has disproportionately abused the state's social welfare system. So we're not going to beat around the bush. Let's just talk about it. First off, yes, the evidence does indicate that these crimes were concentrated among the Somali population. According to prosecutors, 78 of the 86 individuals charged so far in connection with the schemes have Somali ancestry, although most are American citizens. Not only that, but additional evidence suggests that Democratic leaders in Minnesota have been reluctant to confront that hard truth due to political and racial sensitivities. To wit, a 2024 report from Minnesota's Office of the Legislative Auditor found that, quote, the threat of legal consequences and negative media attention affected how the Minnesota Department of Education approached these fraud claims. In the Feeding Our Future case, some Somali American Minnesotans have even called out this dynamic more forcefully. Kaise McGann, a Somali American former investigator in the Medicaid Fraud division of the Office of Minnesota Attorney general, wrote in 2024 that fraudsters have also sought to exploit the burgeoning political power of the Somali community and the feckless fear that establishment politicians and state agencies show when confronted with charges of racism or Islamophobia. Now, the evidence of this fraud supporting terrorist networks is much weaker. In their City Journal piece, Ryan Thorpe and Christopher Rufo claimed that the stolen money was being funneled through Somali intermediaries to the Somalia based militant group Al Shabaab. However, this reporting has not been substantiated and US Prosecutors have not brought any terror related charges in their cases. Thorpe and Rufo didn't provide any paper trail or other evidence to show that this money ended up where they say it did, instead exporting this claim to law enforcement officials who also did not provide objective evidence. Of course this claim is disturbing and should be investigated further, but ultimately it's still up in the air. And as Minnesota's Legislative Auditor Judy Randall said, that doesn't mean it didn't happen, but it doesn't mean that it did happen. It's just that there wasn't enough evidence to definitively tie it. Even without that definitive link, though, the scale of the fraud should put Minnesota's Somali community under the microscope, as uncomfortable as it might be to say that. And it should also put the state's oversight methods under the microscope. Much of this is not unique to Minnesota. Covid era programs handed out billions of dollars from the federal government to support people during the pandemic shutdowns, and they created a massive opportunity for fraud. The Pandemic Response Accountability Committee estimates that over $79 billion was stolen from pandemic relief programs across the country. Something that is unique to Minnesota, however, is the level of social pressure created following George Floyd's murder in 2020. In its coverage of these fraud cases, the New York Times quoted a state prosecutor as saying that officials actively avoided bring for fear of allegations of racism. The state's expanded social programs and culture of avoiding uncomfortable litigation created a breeding ground for potential fraud. Add in an immigrant community from a country where fraud is commonplace and this is the result. But if we're being blunt about these uncomfortable questions, we should also be blunt about Christopher Rufo. Rufo has a history of inflaming culture war issues to be maximally divisive, and his attempt to link Minnesota's fraud to a Somali Islamist militant group fits that trend. His reporting seemed designed to grab the attention of President Trump and Vice President Vance, who are now leveraging the story to claim that Somalis are incompatible with American values, that their culture is inferior, and that fraud is an emergent feature of that culture. These are not dog whistles, they're explicit positions. Quote Norwegians in Minnesota behave similarly to Norwegians in Norway. Somalis in Minnesota behave similarly to Somalis in Somalia, rufo wrote last week. He continued, many cultural patterns from Somalia, particularly clan networks, informal economies, and distrust of state institutions, travel with the diaspora and have shown up in Minnesota as well. In the absence of strong assimilation pressures, the fraud networks aren't so surprising, end quote. Rufo does raise some salient points. Somalia is a dangerous country whose ineffective governance has made it a hotbed for international fraud and piracy for years. Additionally, having grown up in Minnesota, I can attest that the Somali community often seemed isolated or insulated from the broader, mostly white community. Now, at the same time, the Norwegians comparison that Rufo refers to isn't really an apples to apples comparison. Yes, they trace their ancestry to Scandinavia, but they've been in the US for generations where the Somali people that we're talking about are first or second generation Americans. Cultural incompatibility is real among this group, but it's also not permanent in the way that Rufo suggests. And as writers like Jason Riley noted under what the Right Is Saying, US History is rife with examples of migrant groups struggling to adapt when they first came to the country, but eventually assimilating completely. Fine. The solution that Rufo Trump and others are proposing is to cut the cord, stop allowing Somali immigrants into the US and seek to remove as many of those who are already here as possible. To me, that solution feels draconian and shortsighted. Research from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce has shown that immigrants are upwardly mobile over time, with decreasing unemployment and poverty rates and increasing rates of workforce participation and educational attainment. This has also been true of the Somali immigrant community in Minnesota. Between 2000 and 2018, their poverty rate dropped from 62.9% to 47.6%, their workforce participation rate rose from 46.1% to 66.4%, and their homeownership rate rose from 1.7% to 9.4%. The efforts to flatten this group into a caricature of dysfunction and criminality, in President Trump's words, quote, they come from hell and they complain and do nothing but bitch. They ignore the evidence that the cultural assimilation they expect to happen is happening. It just takes time. Simultaneously, the onus is also on the Somali community to recognize that these fraud cases are not one off incidents. Magan, the Somali American fraud investigator who I quoted earlier, diagnosed this problem succinctly and he wrote, my experience as a fraud investigator has taught me that fraud occurs when desire meets opportunity. My community, like others, has its share of people who are poor, desperate and seek shortcuts. Many were skilled professionals whose experience and education credentials are not recognized in the U.S. as a result, they have had to resort to working menial jobs, which can be emotionally debilitating, while failing to deliver financial security. So with all of this in mind, the solution to me is eliminate the opportunities for fraud, aggressively investigate and prosecute crimes as they happen, and tackle the root causes. The first solution requires Minnesota legislators to prioritize safeguards over generosity in the state's robust social safety net. Some programs, like Medicaid housing stabilization services are now being scrapped entirely, and other blank check programs like this should also be subjected to enhanced scrutiny. Governor Tim Walz, clearly sensing his own political vulnerability, has now started down this path. But he started incredibly late and the effort may require a new governor to carry out. The second solution is also underway as prosecutors continue to bring charges against the alleged perpetrators of this fraud. That aggressive tack will need to continue both to dissuade would be fraudsters and to ensure that we have a full accounting for the scale of the alleged crimes that have already been committed. Now, finally, the third solution requires confronting those in the Somali community who have sought to steal from a state and a country that has already given them so much, and that is far more challenging. Of course, that has to start within the community itself, and leaders like Magan offer a blueprint for how to properly assess the problem without demonizing the group as a whole. Other leaders, like Representative Ilhan Omar have taken the opposite approach, positioning themselves as defiantly against the Trump administration while failing to acknowledge the real issues that these fraud cases have unearthed. I think that strategy ignores the very justified anger that many people feel about this story, and it risks exacerbating the animosity towards Somali immigrants that's now bubbling the surface. As with so many issues in today's politics, stories like this are presented as a false binary. You either must side with Trump, Vance, and Rufo in viewing Somali immigrants as a communal drain on US Society that needs to be banished, or you must align with Ilhan Omar and decry any criticism of the Somali community as bigoted and unfair before we can undertake any of the solutions that I've proposed or anyone else has proposed. Rejecting this binary is the essential first step to moving this conversation in a more productive direction. All right, that is it for my take today. I am going to pass it over to our associate editor, Audrey Moorhead, who has a dissent. We are going to be skipping today's reader question to give our main story some extra space. So after Audrey, we'll hand it over to John to take us home. All right, Audrey, over to you.