Podcast Summary: Tangle – "The New Report on Trump and Epstein"

Release Date: July 21, 2025
Host: Isaac Saul
Podcast Description: Tangle is an independent, non-partisan political news podcast where Isaac Saul presents the best arguments from across the political spectrum on current events, coupled with insightful interviews from the political arena.

Introduction

In this episode of Tangle, host Isaac Saul delves into the latest developments in the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein saga, focusing on a recent report published by The Wall Street Journal and the subsequent reactions from President Donald Trump. The episode provides a balanced view by presenting perspectives from both the left and the right, followed by Isaac's personal analysis and additional segments covering related political news.

Main Story: Epstein and Trump in the Spotlight

The centerpiece of today's discussion revolves around a Wall Street Journal report that alleges President Donald Trump sent a provocative birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. The report claims that the letter included sexually suggestive text and a hand-drawn sketch of a nude woman, implicating Trump in Epstein's controversial circle.

Key Points:

• Trump's Denial: President Trump has vehemently denied authoring the letter, labeling the report as a "scam" and has initiated a $20 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and its affiliates.
• DOJ Involvement: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has requested the unsealing of grand jury testimony related to Epstein's sex trafficking case, aiming to provide more transparency amidst public demand.
• Historical Context: Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Theories surrounding his death and connections remain a hotbed of speculation.

Perspectives from the Left

The Left finds the Journal's allegations credible and sees them as potential ammunition against Trump, advocating for continued scrutiny into Trump's relationship with Epstein.

• The Guardian's Margaret Sullivan emphasizes the significance of the story, noting, "It's not just that the 50th birthday card he reportedly penned for Epstein is damning in itself... This lawsuit won't make this damning story go away." [05:15]

• Vox's Eric Levitz criticizes the Democrats' focus on Epstein, suggesting that despite Epstein's death, the backlash still tarnishes Trump's image. He states, "The incontrovertible facts about Trump's relationship with Epstein are unflattering and eyebrow-raising..." [07:30]

• Bloomberg's Matthew Iglesias argues that bipartisan outrage over Epstein can bridge political divides, stating, "The kind of change that many people want is not necessarily dramatic policy change, but change in personnel..." [09:00]

Perspectives from the Right

The Right remains skeptical about the veracity of The Wall Street Journal's report, viewing it as another attempt by the media to undermine Trump.

• The Federalist's Eddie Scarry dismisses the report as potentially fraudulent, noting similarities to past media endeavors to discredit Trump. He questions, "What a coincidence, scary... Another seedy book turns up out of nowhere to associate Trump with criminal conduct." [12:45]

• The Washington Examiner's Christopher Trimogli criticizes Democrats for exploiting Epstein's legacy for political gain, pointing out their previous indifference during the Biden administration. He asserts, "Their silence from when Biden was president is the real indicator of how little they cared about Epstein." [14:20]

• National Review's Andrew C. McCarthy highlights the legal improbabilities of the DOJ releasing grand jury testimonies, arguing that such disclosures could falsely implicate innocent individuals. He states, "Grand jury proceedings are secret by law... It won't satisfy the mob." [16:10]

Isaac Saul's Take

Isaac Saul offers his nuanced perspective on the situation, leaning towards believing the authenticity of The Wall Street Journal's report.

Key Arguments:

1. Trump's History of Drawing: Isaac points out that Trump has a documented history of drawing, contradicting his denials. He references Trump's own writings from 2008 where he mentions drawing for charity. [18:00]

2. Language Consistency: The language used in Epstein's alleged letter aligns with Trump's known speech patterns, debunking claims that it doesn't match his style. [19:10]

3. Friendship with Epstein: Isaac underscores Trump's long-standing relationship with Epstein, highlighting their social interactions and shared circles from the 1990s into the early 2000s. [19:45]

4. Personalized Communication: Trump is known for sending personalized signed notes, further supporting the possibility of his authorship of the letter. [20:20]

5. Wall Street Journal's Credibility: Isaac trusts the Journal's rigorous fact-checking processes, asserting that the publication would not risk its reputation without solid evidence. [21:00]

Conclusion: While acknowledging the murkiness surrounding the case, Isaac believes that the relationship between Trump and Epstein warrants serious consideration and that ongoing speculation should be grounded in verified facts rather than wild conspiracies.

Public Opinion and Additional Political News

Public Polls:

• A Quinnipiac University poll reveals that 17% of registered voters approve of Trump's handling of the Epstein files, while 63% disapprove.
• A YouGov poll indicates that 46% of U.S. adults believe the Wall Street Journal's report is mostly true, whereas 10% find it mostly false, and 27% are unaware of the report.

Other News Highlights:

• Nvidia's Export Controls: Recent developments show Nvidia resuming sales of AI chips to China following the lifting of U.S. Department of Commerce export restrictions. This move is part of a broader agreement involving rare earth minerals between the U.S. and China. [25:00]

• Baltimore's Homicide Rates: In a positive note, Baltimore has seen a significant decline in homicide rates, reaching a record low with only five homicides in April 2025, marking the lowest start to a year on record for the city. Local officials attribute this success to collaborative efforts among the police department, district attorney, and community partners. [27:30]

Questions Answered: Budget Cuts to NPR and PBS

A listener from North Haven, Connecticut, inquired about the reported 3-3.5% budget cuts to NPR and PBS.

Isaac's Response:

• The House of Representatives passed a package rescinding approximately $9 billion in federal funding, which includes a $1 billion cut to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB).
• While NPR and PBS receive a small fraction of their budgets from government funding (1% and 15% respectively), local affiliate stations dependent on CPB funds are facing significant financial threats.
• Isaac notes that neither NPR nor PBS are heavily reliant on government funds, but the removal of CPB funding poses challenges for certain regional stations, pushing them to seek alternative funding sources such as audience donations.

Conclusion

In this episode of Tangle, Isaac Saul navigates the complex and contentious issue surrounding the new Wall Street Journal report on Trump and Epstein. By presenting perspectives from both sides of the political spectrum and offering his own informed analysis, Isaac provides listeners with a comprehensive understanding of the situation. Additionally, the episode touches on related political developments and addresses listener inquiries, ensuring a well-rounded discussion.

Notable Quotes:

• Margaret Sullivan, The Guardian: "A lawsuit won't make this damning story go away, and I doubt that Trump really wants to put himself through legal discovery with all the ugliness that might be exposed."[05:15]

• Eric Levitz, Vox: "The incontrovertible facts about Trump's relationship with Epstein are unflattering and eyebrow raising, even though they are not incriminating." [07:30]

• Eddie Scarry, The Federalist: "What a coincidence, scary... Another seedy book turns up out of nowhere to associate Trump with criminal conduct." [12:45]

• Christopher Trimogli, Washington Examiner: "Their silence from when Biden was president is the real indicator of how little they cared about Epstein." [14:20]

• Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review: "Grand jury proceedings are secret by law... It won't satisfy the mob." [16:10]

Final Notes:
For more in-depth analysis and to support the show, listeners are encouraged to visit readtangle.com, where they can subscribe to newsletters and memberships.