Loading summary
Marketing Team Member
Deep in the ocean, an Orca pod is on the hunt. But these aren't your average Orcas. These guys are organized marketing team. Did you get those social media posts.
Scheduled for the seal migration?
Aye aye Captain. We even have an automated notification for all pod managers when they go live. They use Monday.com to keep their teamwork sharp, their communication clear and their goals in sight. Monday.com or whatever you run even orcas go to Monday.com to dive deeper.
Ryan Reynolds
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. With the price of just about everything going up during inflation, we thought we'd bring our prices down. So to help us, we brought in a reverse auctioneer which is apparently a.
Marketing Team Member
Thing Mint Mobile Unlimited Premium Wireless 2020.
Isaac Saul
Better get 2020, better 151515 15.
Marketing Team Member
Just 15 bucks a month. Sold.
Ryan Reynolds
Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch $45 upfront payment equivalent to $15 per month New customers on first three month plan Only taxes and fees Extra speed slower above 40G Detail Sumtac presents the ins and outs of caring for your home Out Uncertainty, self doubt, stressing about not knowing where to start in plans and guides that make it easy to get home projects done out wordart Sorry Live Laugh lovers in knowing what to do, when to do it and who to hire. Start caring for your home with confidence. Download Thumbtack today.
Marketing Team Member
From executive producer Isaac.
Ryan Reynolds
Saul, this is Tangle.
Isaac Saul
Good morning, good afternoon and good evening and welcome to the Tangle podcast, a place we get views from across the political spectrum, some independent thinking, and a little bit of my take. I'm your host Isaac Saul and on today's episode we're going to be talking about Donald Trump's purported mass deportation plan, what exactly we know about it and what might come of it. Looking ahead. Before we jump into that, I have two quick announcements. First of all, and this one is pretty fun. We're hiring. We have experienced some very rapid growth and in the last couple of weeks have basically hit some of our goals that we had for 2025 and we need to staff up to handle that. So we have two openings that just popped up. The first one is a customer service lead. This is going to start as kind of a half time role. We're looking for a highly organized, dedicated professional to help us provide the best possible service to our readers and listeners that we can. This is a really crucial role to fill for us and we're going to be hiring it as soon as possible. There is a job listing that is in today's episode description and in today's newsletter. Second we're also hiring an assistant to the editor. That's me. We're looking for a very organized individual dedicated to Tangle's mission who has a passion for multimedia and politics. This person will be working directly with me out of our Tangle HQ right here in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with a start date in February or March. This is a full time role and there is a job listing again in today's episode description and in today's newsletter. So that's really fun. We're super excited about that. The second thing is just a quick heads up that on Friday we have our post mortem coming. So since Election Day we've seen a lot of these postmortems, explanations, blame game, whatever you want to call it for what happened in the 2024 election. And in Friday's members only newsletter, I'm going to be sharing mine. Keep your eyes peeled for that. A reminder, if you want to get those newsletters you can go to readtangle.com membership I'm also going to try and do a podcast version of this. It'll either come out on Friday or it'll be part of our Sunday edition. I'm not 100% sure which yet, but either way, if you want that, you need to go to tangledmedia.supercast.com all right, with that out of the way, I'm going to pass it over to John for Quick hits and today's main story and I'll be back for my take.
Marketing Team Member
Thank you Isaac and welcome everybody. Here are your quick hits for today. First up, President elect Donald Trump plans to nominate Fox News host and veteran Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense. Additionally, Trump will nominate former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee to be U.S. ambassador to Israel. Trump also announced that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy will lead a new Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE for short, focused on cutting government spending and streamlining bureaucracy. Number two, President Elect Trump reportedly plans to halt a potential TikTok ban in the US if it goes into effect next year. A bill passed by Congress in April requires a social media app to find a new owner not based in China by January or lose access to US Users. Number three, Jack Teixeira, a former Massachusetts Air National Guardsman, was sentenced to 15 years in prison for leaking classified intelligence documents detailing U.S. surveillance of adversaries and allies. Number four, the Biden administration said it will not limit arms transfers to Israel after determining that the country was making satisfactory progress toward increasing the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza. And number five, a US jury awarded $42 million in damages to three former detainees of the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, determining that they had been subject to torture and mistreatment while imprisoned. We start with this though. President Elect Trump has said he will move swiftly to implement mass deportations after he takes office. Pullman was tapped to serve as border czar in Donald Trump's administration as well. The president elect has promised to begin mass deportations on day one of his second term, that promise sparking concerns for migrant families across the country and right here in central Florida. In the weeks after the election, President Elect Donald Trump reaffirmed his campaign promise to deport millions of immigrants living in the United States illegally. He also started identifying high ranking immigration officials to carry out the policy. Trump has brought on Stephen Miller, a longtime immigration hardliner, as his deputy chief of staff. He chose Tom Homan, a former ICE director and the face of some of Trump's most restrictive policies for his first term, as borders are he has also chosen governor Kristi Noem, who supported his first terms travel ban on select Muslim majority countries, to lead the Department of Homeland Security. You can see our full coverage of Trump's Cabinet and staff picks with a link in today's episode. Description In a Truth Social post announcing Homan's role, Trump said he would be in charge of our nation's borders and all deportation of illegal aliens back to their country of origin. In a Fox News interview on Monday, Homan said the deportation effort would prioritize public safety and national security threats, as well as migrants who had disobeyed court order orders to leave the country last month. Homan told 60 Minutes that the plan would not be a mass sweep of neighborhoods or involve building concentration camps, calling such accusations ridiculous. Instead, he said the plan would amount to targeted arrests of the most dangerous criminals in the country, noting that the country has over 1.5 million convicted criminal unauthorized migrants with final orders of removal, including thousands of gang members. Homan also defended some of Trump's most controversial policies, including family separation, which was barred by a federal judge until 2031. When asked if mass deportations could be carried out without separating families, Homan suggested families can be deported together. The scale and scope of the deportation plan is still unclear, and enacting it will present legal and logistical challenges. The US has limited detention space to house migrants who may be arrested and prepared for deportation. Immigrant rights groups have also promised to resist the administration's efforts. Juan Proano, the CEO of the League of United Latin American Citizens, the oldest Hispanic civil rights group in the US said his group is already raising money and hiring lawyers to fight Trump's ruthless policies in Mexico, where more than half of all unauthorized migrants originate. Immigration advocates say neither shelters nor the border are prepared to take in potentially millions of deportees, many of whom are jobless or have been out of the country for years. Today we're going to examine some arguments about Trump's mass deportation plan from the right and the left, and then Isaac's take.
Isaac Saul
We'll be right back after this quick break.
Marketing Team Member
Deep in the ocean, an orca pod is on the hunt. But these aren't your average Orcas. These guys are organized marketing team. Did you get those social media posts.
Scheduled for the seal migration?
Aye aye Captain. We even have an automated notification for all pod managers when they go live. They use Monday.com to keep their teamwork sharp, their communication clear and their goals in sight. Monday.com or whatever you run. Even orcas go to Monday.com to dive deeper.
Mark Marin
We all have dreams. Dream home renovations, dream vacations, or sending our kids to their dream colleges. But finding straightforward ways to turn those dreams into realistic goals? That's where things get tricky. Mayl understands that. That's why with a dedicated mayoral advisor, you get a personalized plan and a clear path forward. And having the bull at your back helps your whole financial life move with you. So when your plans change, Merrill is with you every step of the way. Go to ML.combullish to learn more. Merrill, a Bank of America company what would you like the power to do? Investing involves risk Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Inc. Registered Broker Dealer Registered Investment Advisor Member SIPC.
Marketing Team Member
First up, let's start with what the right is saying. The right backs Trump's deportation plan, but some warn that he must be discerning in its execution. Many say large scale deportations are needed after record unauthorized migration during the Biden administration. Others argue the plan represents a return to the rule of law. The Wall Street Journal editorial board wrote about Trump's mass deportation promise. In short, Mr. Trump will move to reinstate the border policies of his first term, such as remain in Mexico, which seem to work. Under that deal, migrants claiming asylum in the US Were sent back to Mexico while their cases were pending, which might take months or more. The idea was to break the incentives to game the system, given the backlog of asylum cases. Letting migrants into the US While they wait is an enticement to come, the board said. The political rub may be Mr. Trump's campaign promise to conduct the largest deportation operation in the history of our country. How it goes depends on what Mr. Trump means. Some of Mr. Trump's advisers, including Stephen Miller, have talked about mass deportation in sweeping terms. But enforcement priorities are up to the president, and Mr. Trump has suggested he isn't interested in illegal grandmothers, the board wrote. The public backs him on securing the border and reducing the burden that migrants have put on cities across the country. But Mr. Trump appears to realize support will ebb if the public sees crying children as their parents are deported, or read stories of long settled families broken up and dreamers brought here illegally as children deported to countries they no longer remember. In the Washington Examiner, Byron York made the case for mass deportations. Variations in wording aside, when Trump talks about mass deportation, he is talking about the mass deportation of criminals. It's hard to imagine opposing Trump's proposal who would want to help murderers and drug dealers who entered the country illegally remain in the United States? Yet we have seen much talk that Trump's deportation plans go far, far beyond criminals and will ultimately lead to 10 million, 50 million, perhaps even 20 million people being removed from our country, york said. The Trump plan has been visible in plain sight for quite a while. First, the new administration will seek to deport quickly those illegal immigrants who are deemed national security threats. At the same time, it will pursue illegal immigrants with criminal records either in the US or some other country. Trump's actions, if he takes them, could certainly be characterized as mass deportations, since they would involve the removal of perhaps 1 million people. It would certainly be the largest deportation of criminals in American history. On one hand, it would not please the Trump supporters who want to deport every single person in the US Illegally. After all, every illegal border crosser has violated US Law by unlawfully entering the country. On the other hand, prioritized deportations would be a significant restoration of the rule of law as it applies to the US Border. And that would be a very good thing. In the Digital signal, Simon Hankinson criticized the mass hysteria of deportation. For four years, Americans saw the results of the Biden administration refusing to enforce the law from more preventable crimes to overtax schools, housing and hospitals. They saw millions of inadmissible foreigners allowed to enter the United States despite having no visa and then stay indefinitely through quasi legal fudges of the law. They saw inadmissible aliens being fed, housed and paid using our tax dollars, hankinson wrote. Because Biden left a four year deficit on national immigration law enforcement at the border and inside the country, the Trump administration will have to catch up There are over 1.3 million illegal aliens with official removal deportation orders still in the US They've had their due process and now they should be removed. As our elected leaders do their jobs and as the men and women sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution and the rule of law get back to business, expect all eyes to be on them. There will be hyperbole, spin, selective media coverage and outright lies in much of the national media that will make the press partisanship during Trump's first term look like objectivity, hankinson said. But don't believe the hype. The rule of law is the rock on which this republic is built. A return to that now will seem odd at first, but it is proper, long overdue and deserving of public support. Alright, that is it for what the right is saying. Which brings us to what the left is saying. The left criticizes the deportation plan, with some suggesting it will lead to an economic turndown. Many say the effort is morally indefensible. Others say the plan will punish other countries for the United States internal problems in the New York Times, Paul Krugman argued Trump's deportations will drive up your grocery bill. With the economy starting from essentially full employment in his second term, Trump with mass deportations would degrade productivity, capacity, balloon deficits and yes, bring inflation roaring back, keeping a grim pledge on punitive immigration policy while breaking one on providing relief to American consumers, Krugman wrote. Here's what I mean. If you're upset about grocery prices now, see what happens if Trump goes after a huge part of the agricultural workforce. Immigrants are around three quarters of agricultural workers and roughly half of them are undocumented. When it comes to the downstream economic effects of deportations, it's not just about grocery prices. It's also about the cost of housing. The answer to that problem is to build more housing units. But undocumented immigrants are more than a fifth of the construction workforce, so deportations would severely hamper efforts to increase the housing supply, krugman said. Could we easily make up for the loss of these workers by replacing them with native born workers? No employment among native born adults in their prime working years is higher than it was at any point during Trump's first term. There just isn't a large pool of idle but employable native born Americans to put to work. In the American Prospect, Ryan Cooper wrote, Trump's voters are about to learn he meant what he said. Now that Donald Trump has won again, a furious debate on the left side of the political spectrum has erupted as Democratic Party factions jostle for position of casting blame on everyone but themselves, cooper said. A more interesting conundrum, however, is the maddening fact that Trump paid little or no electoral penalty for his numerous, hideously unpopular positions. A developing body of evidence suggests that a critical mass of voters simply did not hear about these positions or did not believe them if they did. Even if Trump only manages a tenth of what he promises, the deportations are going to be an atrocity for the record books. By way of comparison, about 12 million Germans fled or were deported out of Eastern Europe in the aftermath of the Second World War, and about 600,000 of them died in the process. Now, back in the U.S. fascist thugs, possibly deputized sheriffs and cops will be busting into houses, dragging families out of their beds and hurting them into concentration camps that are certain to be overcrowded, filthy and disease ridden. The construction and agriculture industries, where 1/5 and 1/2 the workforces, respectively, are undocumented, will be dealt a savage blow. In the Washington Post, Eduardo Porter said the world will foot the bill for Trump's immigration policy on November 5, election day in the United States, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum stepped before the news media to point out a drastic decline in the number of migrants arriving at the US Border from around the world, largely because of Mexico's efforts, Porter wrote. It should be no surprise that XI is so willing to be helpful. Donald Trump closed his campaign in North Carolina by threatening to impose tariffs on Mexican goods ranging from 25 to 100% until it stopped the movement of migrants. He also threatened 200% tariffs on Mexican made cars, mass deportations that would push millions of migrants into Mexico, and deployment of the military south of the border to combat drug cartels. To a foreign observer, America's quest for redress around the world is hard to understand. The United States is not only the most prosperous nation on earth, but it is also pulling farther ahead of its peers, growing faster than other affluent economies. What ultimately motivates Trump's voters is that the United States has done a dismal job of distributing the gains from these global winds, porter said. That's not other countries fault, however. That's the fault of a political system unwilling to address the social downsides of the many changes, whether technological, economic or demographic, that modernity has brought about. All right, let's head over to Isaac for his take.
Isaac Saul
All right, that is it for what the left and the right are saying. Which brings us to my take. Whenever a new president is elected, you're going to hear a lot about policy mandates. Looking at this election. I actually don't necessarily buy that Trump has a total mandate, or one any greater than the last few presidents have had. Yes, Republicans won the Senate and they will win the House narrowly. But Trump is also on pace to have a thinner popular vote victory than Hillary Clinton did in 2016. And if Republicans are honest with themselves, they know that their margins are not as vast as they're claiming publicly. If they want to hold on to the House in 2026 and the White House and Senate in 2028, I don't suspect they will legislate as if they are politically invincible. That being said, I do think Trump has a mandate on immigration. It is inarguable to me that the Trump administration's version of immigration policy is the one that the vast majority of Americans prefer. It is the bedrock his political career has been built on since 2016. Trump flip flops on, speaks squishily about or all out avoids a lot of issues. But he has never wavered on immigration. So I fully expect him to pursue a broad deportation effort. I also expect him to re implement his border policies. Trump will want to posture in a way to discourage migrants from even coming here. His very presence in the White House is going to act as a deterrent, and we're already seeing the impact. I think as the leader of the executive branch, with the Senate, House and American public at his back, he does have the mandate to pursue immigration policies in full. That doesn't mean he can violate the law, but it does mean his administration will enact stricter immigration policies that will be supported by the public. I've already explained why I don't fear the quote unquote collapse of democracy under Trump. Similarly, I also can't help but scoff when reading writers like Ryan Cooper under what the Left Is Saying invoke post World World War II Germany and atrocities for the record books, fascist thugs and concentration camps. While discussing a plan to deport unauthorized migrants with violent criminal records, might law enforcement use unnecessary force to arrest unauthorized migrants with violent criminal records? Almost definitely. Do I expect these deportations to require routine violence, Police involved shootings or deaths? No. Maybe I'll eat my words on that, but we could at least save the Holocaust comparison. And yet I do fear this deportation plan more than most of Trump's other policies. Not because I think it's unjust or immoral. If you are here illegally and committing violent crimes or disobeying deportation orders, then your arrest or deportation actually seems just and moral. I don't think it should be controversial to pursue a functioning immigration system by enforcing the law. I fear the plan because I'm still not clear on exactly what it will look like because Trump's campaign rhetoric is often different from his President Elect rhetoric. Byron York, under what the Right Is saying, said that 15 to 20 million people won't be deported under this policy. Yet that's exactly what Donald Trump promised. While campaigning During Trump's first term and before I started tangle, I reported on faith leaders across the country who were hiding migrants in their places of worship to avoid arrest and deportation. I imagine this kind of resistance will manifest again, and if Trump really attempts a zero tolerance policy, we are likely to get some very ugly scenes. This, of course, is to say nothing of the fact that if Trump's deportation effort begins to target migrants who are here illegally but are not breaking any other laws and are part of the labor force, business leaders will start to complain. Then we'll see local economies impacted, and depending on how sweeping the order is, we might see larger scale economic impacts too. These are my fears, but they are largely dependent on the scale of what the Trump administration actually does. On the other hand, Trump's second term poses yet another gigantic opportunity for Congress to actually fix our immigration system system for the long term. Trump's deportation plan, if targeted and organized, could be a part of the short term fix and return a sense of order to the country, while also giving Republicans a big win on the issue to take to any negotiating table. Then for a long term fix, my solutions to the border crisis remain in play. We need to tighten the asylum process. Biden has already started this and it's worked. We need more border security. Trump will probably do this, and then we need to implement verification for employers, rein in parole, offer a pathway to citizenship for DACA recipients, increase the number of legal work permits, and massively scale up the number of judges, lawyers and asylum officers at the border so we can clear the backlog of millions of asylum cases by actually adjudicating their claims and then admitting or deporting them accordingly. Democrats were willing to play ball on parts of this plan when Biden was president, but Trump directed Republicans to block his attempts to ensure Biden didn't get a late term victory. Now, as the minority party, Democrats should still be willing to come to the table and Republicans should end the campaign season charade and find some common ground while they have both leverage and a mandate from the American people. There's a lot of work to get done outside of deporting millions of people or building walls and the sooner we get there, the better. We'll be right back after this quick break.
Mark Marin
We all have dreams. Dream home renovations, dream vacations, or sending our kids to their dream colleges. But finding straightforward ways to turn those dreams into realistic goals? That's where things get tricky. Mayrill understands that. That's why with a dedicated mayoral advisor, you get a personalized plan and a clear path forward. And having the bull at your back helps your whole financial life move with you. So when your plans change, Merrill is with you every step of the way. Go to ML.combullish to learn more. Merrill, a Bank of America company what would you like the power to do Investing Involves Risk Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Inc. Registered Broker Dealer Registered Investment Advisor Member.
Isaac Saul
SIPC hey, it's Mark Marin from WTF here to let you know that this podcast is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. And I'm sure the reason you're listening to this podcast right now is because you chose it well. Choose Progressive's name your price tool and you could find insurance options that fit your budget so you can pick the best one for your situation. Who doesn't like choice? Try it@progressive.com and now some legal info. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates price and coverage match limited by state law. Not available in all states Gifting is.
Marketing Team Member
Hard, but here's a hint. Give the gift of connection from US Cellular.
Isaac Saul
Not sure what that means. Well, here's a slightly more specific hint. You can choose four free phones and get four lines for $90 a month from US Cellular.
Marketing Team Member
Your family wants new phones, so how do we know? They told us.
Isaac Saul
Yeah, the good news is that compared to wrapping presents, you're great at getting hints.
Marketing Team Member
So take the hint and get them.
Four free phones and four lines for.
$90 a month US Cellular built for us.
Isaac Saul
All right, that is it for my take, which brings us to your questions answered. This one is related to immigration is from John in Silver Spring, Maryland. John said you rather neutrally described home and with words. He remains a proponent of family separation without describing this policy as a human rights violation. What is Tangle's policy for providing context to readers when a proposed policy is a violation of the Geneva Conventions and or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. So first of all, yes, we have a policy of using neutral labels for controversial ideas to try to keep as many readers as possible from having a knee jerk response to our topics before they get a chance to engage with different ideas. To be clear, if a controversial event results in a definitive legal outcome like Roe v. Wade being overturned or Donald Trump being convicted on felony charges, we will describe those outcomes definitively. However, the policy of separating migrant families when their parents have crossed the border illegally has not been definitively and legally described as a human rights violation by the United Nations. Plenty of articles have argued that this policy should be called a human rights violation. Amnesty International has argued the policy resulted in human rights violations. The group Children's Rights has argued that the policy was a violation of the UN's International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and both the American Bar association as well as the Columbia Human Rights Law Review have called the policy illegal under U.S. law. Those arguments are pretty convincing, and we would say that family separations at the border constituted a violation of those children's rights. Furthermore, a federal judge did prohibit the policy for eight years, but he fell short of labeling it outright illegal. Therefore, we cannot accurately give this policy a black and white label as either illegal or as a human rights violation. And in context in an article where we were describing Trump's various chosen appointees for his upcoming term, we only have the space to accurately label the policy before moving on all right, that is it for your questions answered. I'm going to send this back to John for the rest of the podcast. I'll see you guys tomorrow. Don't forget to check out those jobs or pass them along to people who might be interested that are in our episode description and newsletter today. Have a good one. Peace.
Marketing Team Member
Thanks, Isaac. Here's your under the radar story for today, folks. On Tuesday, the Biden administration announced that oil and natural gas companies will pay a federal fee if they emit methane above prescribed limits. The Environmental Protection Agency rule says that excess methane produced in 2024 could result in a fee of $900 per ton, with fees rising to $1,200 per tonne in 2025 and $1,500 per tonne by 2026. Methane, which is a more powerful, although more short lived greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, is responsible for about a third of all greenhouse gas emissions, with the oil and natural gas sector being the largest industrial source of methane emissions in the United States. The EPA says the rule is designed to encourage early development of available technologies to reduce methane emissions and other harmful air pollutants. However, the rule will not go into effect until early 2025, and President elect Trump could reverse course as part of a planned deregulatory agenda when he takes office. The Associated Press has this story and there's a link in today's episode description all right, next up is our numbers section the percentage of US Adults who say they favor the US Government starting a new national program to deport all undocumented immigrants currently living in the U.S. illegally is 62%, according to a June 2024 CBS News poll. The percentage of U.S. adults who would favor local law enforcement trying to identify which people were US Citizens and which were undocumented immigrants as part of a national deportation program is 62%. The percentage of Harris supporters who favor mass deportations is 27%, according to a September 2024 Pew Research poll. The percentage of Trump supporters who favor mass deportations is 88%. The percentage of US Hispanics who say increasing deportations of people who are in the country illegally would help the border situation is 33%, according to a March 2024 Pew Research poll. The percentage of other U.S. adults who say increasing deportations would help the border situation is 55%. The percentage of hired crop farm workers in the US who held no work authorization between 2018 and 2020 is 41%, according to the US Department of Agriculture. And the percentage of hired crop farm workers in the US who held no work authorization between 1989 and 1991 was 14%. All right, and last but not least, our have a nice day story. In the 1960s, India's Green Revolution favored farming rice and wheat crops with high yields. However, monocropping requiring frequent use of pesticides and fertilizers caused biodiversity in the nation to suffer. But the reintroduction of millets to India's agriculture could help. Millets are energy and water efficient, which could save India 50 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions and 300 billion cubic meters of water each year. This, combined with their incredible health benefits, makes their recultivation an exciting prospect. Reasons to Be Cheerful has this story and there's a link in today's episode description. Alright everybody, that is it for today's episode. As always, if you'd like to support our work, Please go to retangle.com and sign up for a membership. You can also go to tanglemedia.supercast.com to sign up for a premium podcast membership, which will get you ad free daily podcasts, Friday podcasts, Sunday podcasts, interviews, and so much more. We'll be right back here tomorrow. For Isaac and the rest of the crew, this is John Law signing off. Have a great day y'all. Peace.
Isaac Saul
Our podcast is written by me, Isaac Saul, and edited and engineered by Dean Thomas. Our script is edited by Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback Daily Saul and Sean Brady. The logo for our podcast was made by Magdalena Bokova, who is also our social media manager. The music for the podcast was produced by Diet75. And if you're looking for more from Tangle, please go check out our website@readtangle.com that's readtangle.com.
Tangle Podcast Episode Summary: "Trump's Mass Deportation Plan"
Host: Isaac Saul | Episode: Trump's Mass Deportation Plan
In this compelling episode of Tangle, host Isaac Saul navigates the contentious issue of former President Donald Trump's alleged mass deportation plan. The discussion offers a balanced examination of the plan, incorporating perspectives from both political spectrums and providing Isaac's insightful analysis.
Timestamp [01:46]
Isaac Saul begins the episode by introducing the central topic: Donald Trump's promise to implement large-scale deportations of undocumented immigrants upon taking office. Saul sets the stage for an in-depth exploration of the plan's feasibility, potential impacts, and the varied responses it elicits across the political landscape.
Isaac outlines Trump's commitment to enforce stringent immigration policies, aiming to deport millions of immigrants residing illegally in the United States. Key appointments to spearhead this initiative include Stephen Miller as deputy chief of staff and Tom Homan as the face of the deportation efforts, signaling a return to the hardline stances of Trump's previous administration.
Notable Quote:
"Trump has brought on Stephen Miller, a longtime immigration hardliner, as his deputy chief of staff." [04:20]
The episode delves into the support Trump's deportation plan garners from conservative circles, emphasizing the necessity of enforcing immigration laws to uphold national security and economic stability.
The Wall Street Journal praises Trump's intention to reinstate policies like "Remain in Mexico," which require asylum seekers to wait in their home countries while their cases are processed, thereby reducing the incentive to unlawfully enter the U.S.
Byron York of The Washington Examiner argues that while mass deportations are essential, the focus should be on removing individuals who pose genuine security threats, thereby maintaining public safety without overstepping into overly punitive measures.
Notable Quotes:
"The public backs him on securing the border and reducing the burden that migrants have put on cities across the country." [10:13]
"It is inarguable to me that the Trump administration's version of immigration policy is the one that the vast majority of Americans prefer." [10:13]
Contrastingly, the episode highlights significant opposition from liberal voices who caution against the economic and humanitarian ramifications of mass deportations.
Paul Krugman of The New York Times warns that deporting large numbers of immigrants could disrupt vital sectors like agriculture and construction, leading to increased costs in grocery prices and housing due to labor shortages.
Eduardo Porter from The Washington Post draws historical parallels to post-World War II deportations, expressing fears of widespread human rights abuses and severe economic downturns resulting from the removal of millions of workers.
Notable Quotes:
"Trump with mass deportations would degrade productivity, capacity, balloon deficits and yes, bring inflation roaring back." [10:13]
"By way of comparison, about 12 million Germans fled or were deported out of Eastern Europe in the aftermath of the Second World War, and about 600,000 of them died in the process." [23:46]
Isaac provides a nuanced perspective, acknowledging Trump's focus on immigration as a political cornerstone while expressing concern over the plan's potential execution challenges.
Political Mandate: Saul questions the extent of Trump's electoral mandate, suggesting that while there is substantial support for stricter immigration policies, the actual implementation may face significant obstacles.
Execution Concerns: He highlights logistical issues such as limited detention facilities and the potential for widespread resistance from immigrant communities and civil rights organizations.
Bipartisan Solutions: Saul advocates for a balanced approach, combining targeted deportations with comprehensive immigration reform to address systemic issues and ensure humane treatment of migrants.
Notable Quotes:
"I fully expect him to pursue a broad deportation effort. I also expect him to re-implement his border policies." [18:37]
"I fear the plan because I'm still not clear on exactly what it will look like because Trump's campaign rhetoric is often different from his President Elect rhetoric." [18:37]
Listeners' inquiries are addressed, particularly concerning the podcast's stance on labeling controversial policies. Isaac clarifies Tangle's commitment to neutrality, explaining that while the podcast strives to present information without bias, it acknowledges when policies are widely regarded as human rights violations by reputable organizations.
Notable Quote:
"We have a policy of using neutral labels for controversial ideas to try to keep as many readers as possible from having a knee jerk response." [25:05]
The episode underscores public sentiment and statistical data surrounding mass deportations:
Notable Quote:
"The percentage of Trump supporters who favor mass deportations is 88%." [27:58]
In addition to the main topic, Isaac touches on environmental policy changes, noting the Biden administration's new regulations on methane emissions from oil and gas companies—a potential area of rollback under a Trump administration, signaling broader implications for regulatory practices.
Isaac wraps up the episode by reiterating the complexity of executing a mass deportation plan. While acknowledging the political support for stringent immigration measures, he emphasizes the need for careful implementation to avoid economic disruptions and humanitarian crises. Isaac calls for bipartisan collaboration to create sustainable immigration reforms that balance security concerns with economic and ethical considerations.
Final Thought:
"There's a lot of work to get done outside of deporting millions of people or building walls, and the sooner we get there, the better." [18:37]
Supporting the Podcast:
Listeners are encouraged to support Tangle by visiting readtangle.com for memberships, which offer ad-free episodes, exclusive interviews, and more.
This detailed summary encapsulates the essence of the episode, providing a comprehensive overview for those who haven't tuned in while highlighting the critical discussions and viewpoints presented by Isaac Saul and his guests.