
Anthropic raises the second largest financing round of all time. Other AI players are beginning to show hockey stick revenue growth. Meta wants to add facial recognition to its glasses. Ring pulls back from some recognition partnerships for its camera. And, of course, your Weekend Longreads Suggestions.
Loading summary
A
Welcome to the Tech Boo. Write home for Friday 13th February 2026. I'm Brian McCullough. Today Anthropic raises the second largest financing round of all time. Other AI players are beginning to show hockey stick revenue growth. Meta wants to add facial recognition to its glasses ring pulls back from some recognition partnerships for its cameras and of course your weekend long read suggestions. Here's what you missed today in the world of tech. Anthropic has raised a $30 billion Series G round led by GIC and CO2 and CO led by D.E. shaw, Dragonier, Founders Fund, Iconic and MGX at a $380 billion post money valuation. Quoting CNBC OpenAI has the largest private tech fundraising round on record. Rival Anthropic now has the second largest. Anthropic announced on Thursday the close of a $30 billion funding round at a 380 billion doll valuation, more than double what the artificial intelligence company was worth in September when it last raised money, Anthropic said. The round includes a portion of the previously announced investments from Microsoft and Nvidia, which said in November that they plan to commit up to 5 and $10 billion, respectively. Anthropic's annualized revenue has climbed to $14 billion, the company said, after revenue last year reached roughly $10 billion. Whether it is entrepreneurs, startups or the world's largest enterprises, the message from our customers is the same. Claude is increasingly becoming more critical to how businesses work, anthropic CFO Krishna Rao said in a statement. This fundraising reflects the incredible demand we are seeing from these customers. The company said the fresh capital will support Anthropic's infrastructure expansion, research and its continued investment in enterprise grade products. OpenAI is also engaged in fundraising talks with investors for a round that could close at around $100 billion. As CNBC previously reported, the company has to pad its cash position after ink $1.4 trillion worth of infrastructure deals last year. Anthropic gets about 80% of its business from enterprises, CEO Dario Amadai told CNBC last month. That's partly thanks to the company's viral AI coding tool Claude Code, which can automate parts of the software development process. Claude Code's annualized revenue has increased to $2.5 billion and business subscriptions have quadrupled since the start of the year, Anthropic said Thursday. Enterprise users represent more than half of Claude Code's revenue. Just to underline that a bit, Anthropic says its run rate revenue has hit $14 billion, growing over 10x annually in each of the past three years and Claude Code's run rate revenue has grown to more than $2.5 billion. We are folks seeing revenue in some of these places. Go hockey. Here's another data point to that end, also from CNBC. Cohere hit roughly $240 million in annual recurring revenue last year, surpassing its $200 million target, according to a February investor memo viewed by CNBC. It saw quarter over quarter growth of more than 50% throughout 2025, the memo said. Our thesis is clearly resonating in the market, the company wrote. Our sales pipeline continues to grow as global organizations across regulated sectors choose Cohere as their trusted partner. AI adoption at scale Founded in Toronto in 2019, Cohere develops models and builds software tools for businesses. The company is backed by investors including Nvidia and Salesforce Ventures, and its valuation has swelled to roughly $7 billion. Cohere's investor memo comes after CEO Aiden Gomez said in October that the startup hopes to make its public market debut soon. He told Bloomberg that he thinks investors would welcome a pure play AI investment opportunity. Cohere told investors that its Capital Efficient model sets it apart from its rival in the industry. The company primarily generates revenue from software, and it said it can avoid hefty infrastructure costs because customers can run its models through their managed cloud services or on their own hardware directly. This approach allows Cohere to invest more aggressively in customer acquisition and research and development, according to its investor memo. Gohere's gross margins averaged around 70% in 2025, expanding by 25 basis points year over year, the memo said. By scaling compute resources proportionally to customer demand, we remain insulated from the SP speculative excesses surrounding the broader AI market. Positioning Cohere for more sustainable growth, cohere wrote. End quote. The New York Times has seen a memo suggesting that Meta plans to add facial recognition to its smart glasses later this year, saying the political tumult in the US could distract critics from the feature's release. Quote Five years ago, Facebook shut down the facial recognition system for tagging people and photos on its social network, saying it wanted to find the right balance for a technology that raises privacy and legal concerns. Now it wants to bring facial recognition back. Meta, Facebook's parent company, plans to add the feature to its smart glasses, which it makes with the owner of Ray Ban and Oakley, as soon as this year, according to four people involved with the plans who were not authorized to speak publicly about confidential discussions. The features, internally called Nametag, would let wearers of smart glasses identify people and get information about them via Meta's artificial intelligence assistant. Meta's plans could change the Silicon Valley company has been conferring since early last year about how to release a feature that carries safety and privacy risks, according to an internal document viewed by the New York Times. The document from May described plans to first release Nametag to attendees of a conference for the blind, which the company did not do last year, before making it available to the general public. Meta's internal memo said the political tumult in the United States was good timing for the features release. We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns, according to the document from Meta's Reality Labs, which works on hardware including smart glasses. Facial recognition technology has long raised civil liberty and privacy concerns for its potential use by governments to monitor citizens and suppress dissent, by corporations to track unwitting customers or by creeps at bars. Some cities and states have restricted or banned use of the technology by the police over concerns about its accuracy. Meta is exploring who should be recognizable through the technology, two of the people said. Possible options include recognizing people a user knows because they are connected on a Meta platform and identifying people whom the user may not know but who have a public account on a Meta site like Instagram. The feature would not give people the ability to look up anyone they encountered as a universal facial recognition tool to people familiar with the plan, said Meta. Smart glasses require require a wearer to activate them, to ask the AI assistant a question, or to take a photo or video. The company is also working on glasses internally called Super Sensing, that would continually run cameras and sensors to keep a record of someone's day, similar to how AI note takers summarize video call meetings. Three people involved with the plans said facial recognition would be a key feature for Super Sensing glasses, so they could, for example, remind wearers of tasks when they saw a colleague. Mr. Zuckerberg has questioned if the glasses should keep their LED light on to show people they are using using the Super Sensing feature or if they should use another signal, one person involved in the plan said. As part of a FTC settlement, Meta in the past has agreed to review every new or modified product for potential risks to the privacy of the company's users. In January 2025, Meta relaxed that process for reviewing privacy risks, according to an internal post viewed by the Times. The company's privacy teams have less influence over product releases, and there are new limits on how long the risk review process takes. Around that time, employees who worked on Risk Review questioned whether Meta would still be in compliance with its FTC settlement under the changes. Andy Millen, a director of Risk Review and Reality Labs, told them that she believed the changes could push the bounds of Meta's agreement with the ftc, according to a recording of an internal meeting obtained by the Times. Mark wants to push on it a little bit, Ms. Millen said, referring to Mr. Zuckerberg. End quote.
B
The world moves fast, your workday even faster Pitching products, drafting reports, analyzing data Microsoft 365 copilot is your AI assistant for work built into Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and other Microsoft 365 apps you use, helping you quickly write, analyze, create, and summarize so you can cut through clutter and clear a path to your best work. Learn more@Microsoft.com M365 copilot.
A
Picture this. You've been chosen to lead AI onboarding for your team that includes everyone from seasoned technical pros to AI newcomers. No pressure, right? That's where ARIA comes in. Aria's no Code, Low Code and Pro Code platform makes it easy for your organization to embrace AI, regardless of technical experience. With Aria's Unified Secure Security layer, advanced threat detection and robust compliance measures, your AI ecosystem can stay safe while your team innovates. Worried about staying on budget, ARIA's cost optimization tools can help you manage and forecast your AI spend, so there are no surprises. Get started at aeria.com morning brew that's aria.com morningbrew.
C
Eczema is unpredictable, but you can flare less with Ebglis, a once monthly treatment for moderate to severe severe eczema after an initial four month or longer dosing phase. About four in ten people taking Emplis achieved itch relief and clear or almost clear skin at 16 weeks, and most of those people maintained skin that's still more clear at one year with monthly dosing.
D
Emglis Lebricizumab LBKZ, a 250 milligram per 2 milliliter injection, is a prescription medicine used to treat adults and children 12 years of age and older who weigh at least 88 pounds or 40 kilograms with moderate to severe eczema, also called atopic dermatitis, that is not well controlled with prescription therapies used on the skin or topicals, or who cannot use topical therapies. EBGLISS can be used with or without topical topical corticosteroids. Don't use if you're allergic to ebglis. Allergic reactions can occur that can be severe eye problems can occur. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems. You should not receive a live vaccine when treated with Ebglis before starting evglis, tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection.
C
Ask your doctor about ebglis and visit eglis.lilly.com or call 1-800-lillyrx or 1-800-545-5979.
A
Amazon's ring has canceled its partnership with Flock Safety, which would have let law enforcement agencies request footage from Ring doorbell use after a backlash Quoting the Verge following intense backlash to its partnership with Flock Safety, a surveillance technology company that works with law enforcement agencies, Ring has announced it is canceling the integration. In a statement published on Ring's blog and provided to the Verge ahead of publication, the company said, quote, following a comprehensive review, we determined the planned flak Safety integration would require significantly more time and resources than anticipated. We therefore made the joint decision to cancel the integration and continue with our current partners. The integration never launched, so no Ring customer videos were ever sent to Flock Safety, end quote. The statement goes on to say that Ring's mission to make neighborhoods safer comes with significant responsibility to our customers, to the communities we serve, and to the trust you place in our products and features. Trust is the big one there. Over the last few weeks, the company has faced significant public anger over its connection to Flock, with Ring users being encouraged to smash their cameras and some announcing on social media that they are throwing away their Ring devices. The Flock partnership was announced last October, but following recent unrest across the country related to ICE activities, public pressure against the Amazon owned Ring's involvement with the company started to mount. Flock has reportedly allowed ICE and other federal agencies to access its network of surveillance cameras, and influencers across social media have been claiming that Ring is providing a direct link to ice. While that claim probably isn't accurate, as the Flock integration has never gone live. Ring has a history of partnering with police, and the new partnership quickly came under intense criticism, adding few fuel to the fire. This weekend, Ring aired a Super bowl ad for its new AI powered search party feature. While the company says the feature is designed to find lost dogs and maintains it is not capable of finding people, the ad raised fears that Ring cameras were being used for mass surveillance. The ad shows dozens of Ring cameras in a neighborhood scanning the streets. On top of this, the company recently launched a new facial recognition feature called Familiar Faces combined with searchparty, the technological leap to using neighborhood cameras to search for people through a mass surveillance network suddenly seems very Small Flock was the second partner Ring announced for community requests, the first being Axon, a law enforcement technology company known for making Tasers. With the new service, only law enforcement agencies that use the company's software can submit requests, but the end result is the same. Law enforcement gets video from users if they choose to share it. Ring spokesperson Yassi Jarger says the Exxon partnership is unaffected by the end of the Flock integration. Additionally, she says no other integrations are currently being explored. End quote. Time for the weekend. Long Read Suggestions first up from the Journal the AI race has broken a long standing Silicon Valley no, no quote notion is among a host of startups and tech companies including Stripe, OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks and SpaceX that are giving employees eager to access wealth tied up in private shares a way to cash out some of it. It marks a shift in Silicon Valley culture as companies stay private longer. Selling startup shares early was long viewed as a taboo and a sign of lacking long term commitment. Companies have been able to successfully remove the stigma of doing secondary offers for employees, said Charlie Franklin, chief executive of compa, which tracks compensation data. The dam is broken. The number of tender offers completed on Carta, which offers financial services to startups, climbed 60% in 2025 from the prior year. Even young startups are pursuing tender offers as demand surges for private artificial intelligence stocks, and founders recognize that such deals are crucial to retaining talent. If on paper you're worth 10 million bucks, you're going to want liquidity for that because you're living in a studio apartment in San Francisco when you could instead go and buy a 6,000 square foot house in Atherton, an exclusive suburb, said Noel Moldvai, co founder and chief executive of private stock marketplace Augment. Stripe, founded in 2010, is in the early stages of a tender offer that will value the payments company at over $140 billion, up from $91.5 billion a year earlier, according to people familiar with the matter. Anthropic has also allowed employees to sell shares in the past and is planning another tender offer at a $350 billion valuation, according to people familiar with the matter. End Quote and from the New York Times, a look at how AI is disrupting the romance novel industry. QUOTE Ms. Rampoti began writing romance novels with the help of artificial intelligence in 2024, using the program Pseudo Write. As a plus size woman, Ms. Rampoti wanted to see heavier set heroines she could relate to in romance fiction. AI supercharged her writing process, enabling her to produce 10 novels in a little over a year, including the Billionaire's Curvy Match and Curves Own Pregnant by the Billionaire. But while the program made writing faster and easier, it was terrible at describing a plus sized heroine, perhaps because there are so few in mainstream fiction, which many AI programs were trained on. Whenever Ms. Rampoti's curvy protagonist, an event planner named Sienna, was in a scene, the AI constantly referenced her weight, for example, noting that a chair groaned when she sat down. When you make a point that someone is plus size, it will exaggerate. Somebody is suddenly humongous, she said. It's impossible to gauge how many romance novels are produced with artificial intelligence. Many authors don't reveal they use chatbots for fear of alienating readers. A survey of more than 1200 authors across genres showed that about a third were using generative AI for plotting, outlining or writing, and the majority said they did not disclose their AI use to readers, according to BookBub, a book discovery site that released the poll last May. Some authors who publicly oppose the technology are secretly signing up for Ms. Hart's classes, she said. The rap rapid incursion of AI generated stories is rattling some in the romance business. Publishers and authors worry that books by real authors are getting lost in a sea of digital slop as AI enabled novels flood the market. End quote. But here's my bigger question, the question I've asked before. When Sam Altman turns on the ability to have ChatGPT spin up your romance story for you on demand, exactly how you want, do you need to turn to someone else to write the story you want to read right now? That's basically the question for all of art. Full stop. Right? And again, I think this is coming sooner than everybody thinks. If I get time to edit it tonight or tomorrow, you will have a bonus episode this weekend wherein our good friend Chris Mims of the Wall Street Journal and I talk in a pretty philosophical way about using AI in our daily lives. An interesting conversation given the headlines from this week. Like I said, I hope to get that to you tomorrow. We shall see. Talk to you on.
Date: February 13, 2026
Host: Brian McCullough
This episode zeroes in on monumental shifts in the AI industry, charting Anthropic’s record-setting fundraising, revenue booms at leading AI startups, and escalating concerns over privacy and surveillance as major tech players expand facial recognition capabilities. The host also dives into changes in secondary markets for private shares, the effects of AI in creative industries like romance fiction, and the end of a controversial law enforcement partnership.
“Claude is increasingly becoming more critical to how businesses work.”
— Krishna Rao, CFO, Anthropic (01:29)
“By scaling compute resources proportionally to customer demand, we remain insulated from the speculative excesses surrounding the broader AI market.”
— Cohere investor memo (04:50)
“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.”
— Meta internal Reality Labs document, via NYT (06:30)
“Mark wants to push on it a little bit.”
— Andy Millen, Risk Review and Reality Labs director, referring to Mark Zuckerberg (08:10)
“The integration never launched, so no Ring customer videos were ever sent to Flock Safety.”
— Ring statement (10:57)
“The dam is broken. The number of tender offers completed on Carta... climbed 60% in 2025.”
— Charlie Franklin, CEO of Compa (12:06)
“When you make a point that someone is plus size, it will exaggerate. Somebody is suddenly humongous.”
— Ms. Rampoti, author (13:44)
“Do you need to turn to someone else to write the story you want to read right now? That’s basically the question for all of art. Full stop.”
— Brian McCullough, host (14:32)
Anthropic CFO Krishna Rao (01:29):
“Claude is increasingly becoming more critical to how businesses work.”
Cohere Investor Memo (04:50):
“By scaling compute resources proportionally to customer demand, we remain insulated from the speculative excesses surrounding the broader AI market.”
Meta Reality Labs Internal Document (06:30):
“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.”
Andy Millen, Meta (08:10):
“Mark wants to push on it a little bit.”
Ring Statement (10:57):
“The integration never launched, so no Ring customer videos were ever sent to Flock Safety.”
Charlie Franklin, Compa CEO (12:06):
“The dam is broken. The number of tender offers completed on Carta... climbed 60% in 2025.”
Ms. Rampoti, AI Romance Author (13:44):
“When you make a point that someone is plus size, it will exaggerate. Somebody is suddenly humongous.”
Brian McCullough, Host (14:32):
“Do you need to turn to someone else to write the story you want to read right now? That’s basically the question for all of art. Full stop.”
Brian McCullough’s delivery is brisk, direct, and analytical, fitting for a daily news digest. Industry insight is paired with skepticism and a touch of wry humor, especially in the philosophical musings about the art-AI juncture and Silicon Valley’s evolving mores. The show blends quotation-heavy reportage with sharp, speculative commentary.