A (0:04)

Welcome to the Tech Brew Ride home for Wednesday, September 3rd, 2025. I'm Brian McCullough. Today, Google Whistles past the graveyard with the remedy ruling on its antitrust case. OpenAI makes a big acquisition. Anthropic has a big new raise and a huge new valuation to boot. And why are AI companies finding it so hard to engineer safe interactions with chatbots? Here's what you missed today in the world of tech. The long awaited remedies ruling in the U.S. v. Google search case finally landed, and it's a mixed bag. It keeps Google structurally intact, but puts new guardrails around how it competes. U.S. district Judge Amit Mehta rejected the Justice Department's most aggressive fixes, meaning Google will not be forced to spin off Chrome or Android. But the judge did order meaningful behavioral remedies. Google must share certain search data with qualified rivals, and it can't use exclusive distribution deals that box competitors out. On the money side, the court is letting Google continue its lucrative default placement payments, including its revenue sharing deal with Apple, rather than tearing those up outright. That clears up a major investor overhang for the company. Alphabet popped roughly 7% after hours, and Apple climbed around 3% on the news. The court framed the lighter touch approach partly around how quickly AI is reshaping search, with the judge signaling that emerging AI players represent a credible competitive force, especially if they can train on some of the data Google will now have to provide. So what exactly changes? Judge Meta outlined a set of rules designed to curb the exclusionary parts of Google's playbook. The company is barred from striking or maintaining exclusive arrangements that tie distribution of search, Chrome Assistant or Gemini to revenue deals or app bundles that keep rivals off devices. Google must share slices of its search index and user interaction data with qualified competitors under defined terms, and it has to offer search and search ad syndication on standard rates so others can build viable products. A technical committee will be set up to enforce the order. The judge asked the Department of Justice and Google to meet and confer and submit a draft final judgment by September 10, with remedies intended to last six years once entered. Two important caveats. First, this isn't the end of the litigation clock. Google has already signaled it will appeal, and legal experts expect any final outcome to take years, potentially going all the way to the Supreme Court, which could delay full implementation. Second, the judge explicitly calibrated remedies in light of AI's rise, arguing courts shouldn't gaze into a crystal ball translation. He opted for less invasive, more easily defensible remedies rather than a breakup that could get overturned on appeal. What this means for the larger tech industry? I think this ruling says that defaults still matter, but exclusivity is out. Device makers and carriers can keep taking Google's money for default placement, but they get more freedom to preload or promote rival search options without jeopardizing revenue. That could open doors for specialty or AI forward search entrants to get real distribution. Also, data is the new remedy here. Forced data access is the big swing. If enforced well, sharing portions of the index and interaction signals on Google search could shorten the Runway for challengers to reach decent quality in search, especially AI assistants that behave like search engines. So expect immediate lobbying over what counts as a qualified competitor to Google search, what privacy redactions apply, and how quickly data must flow. Also note that Europe's DMA was a reference point in this case, but what the judge did here is narrower. Meta nodded to Brussels approach to tech regulation but kept his order time boxed and less prescriptive. So watch for compliance theater versus Real openness as the monitoring committee gets stood up zooming out. This search ruling lands while Google still faces separate remedies proceedings later this month on the DOJ's ad tech case where a different judge has already found illegal monopolization. Add in Google's ongoing battles over its app store and you get a picture of sustained multi front oversight rather than a single knockout punch that might have broken up Google. Bottom line Alphabet Google dodged the existential cell slash Android remedy, but it didn't quite get off scot free. The company now has to live under a data sharing regime, no exclusivity rules and a monitor constraints that could over time pry open distribution and help AI native challengers reach parity faster. The near term market reaction is clearly one of relief. More on that in a second. But the long term story hinges on how robust the data sharing pipes are, how strictly the court polices exclusivity, and how quickly users adopt AI experiences that look less like 10 blue links and more like conversations. Here's MG Siegler's take Eddy Q and Tim Cook can breathe a huge sigh of relief tonight, and Mozilla can just breathe tonight, but so too can Google. This case is about them after all. And while any exclusive default placement deals are dead and they will have to start sharing some search data with rivals, which they already have to do to some degree in the EU and it hasn't really mattered, the government isn't getting the big trophy it sought here, which was Chrome again from Day one when it was announced the government would try to go after Google's browser, I laid out a pretty clear picture as to why Chrome wasn't going anywhere. It just made almost no sense on a number of fronts. Chrome is valuable to Google, insanely valuable to Google, but not in the ways it would be to others. Sorry OpenAI and nice try Perplexity. And while Google was perplexingly trying their hardest to make a sell off make more sense to the judge by starting to bake Gemini into Chrome, the reality is that AI is still too nascent a field with too much competition for the court to do much here. Sorry Tim Wu, this will have to be litigated in hindsight, as is the usual case it seems. But it also seems like there's no way to know how this all plays out right now. And in fact, it feels like if anything, AI is proving that market forces work even when the government doesn't get involved. Just as happened to Microsoft way back when. Despite the government constantly taking credit there, Google search is in the process of being disrupted. Not by the antitrust case or any of these remedies, but by a new technology naturally rising. Google can keep insisting, suggesting that this isn't happening, but just follow their actions. Those say all you need to know. It's all Gemini, all the time, everywhere. And if the placement in search helps Gemini gain a dominant position in AI, well, I suspect the judge will revisit this whole situation. But it's still a very big if. And the Wall Street Journal notes this quote, Google isn't out of the legal woods. There are cases pending in the US and Europe, as well as the lingering possibility that a body appointed by Judge Mehta to oversee the court's remedies finds Google isn't sticking to its obligations. Apple too may not be home free. Meta said he is prepared to revisit the idea of a payment ban if, quote, competition is not substantially restored through the remedies the court does impose. But make no mistake, the ruling amounts to a major win for both companies. For both, maintaining the status quo is about as good as it gets. P.S. at the time of this recording, Google stock is up more than 8%, I should say Alphabet stock hitting a new all time high, adding about 200 billion doll in market cap. OpenAI is acquiring product analytics company Statsig for $1.1 billion and shuffling its executive roles with Statsig CEO Vijay Raji becoming OpenAI's CTO of applications. Or as the Verge puts it, OpenAI is starting to build out its app Team Statsig, the company OpenAI is acquiring, specializes in A, B testing and other features for companies looking to improve their products, and OpenAI is bringing on its founder and CEO, Vijay Raji, as a new C suite executive. Raji will be OpenAI's CTO of applications, heading up product engineering for both ChatGPT and Codex, with responsibilities that span core systems and product lines, including infrastructure and integrity. Once the acquisition is finalized, Statsig employees will become OpenAI employees, OpenAI wrote in the blog post, noting that the deal's close will be subject to regulatory approval. It will continue operating independently and serving its customer base out of its Seattle office. Will take a measured approach to any future integration, ensuring continuity for current customers and enabling the team to stay focused on what they do best. OpenAI also announced it was shuffling some other executive positions. Srinivas Narayanan, who heads up the company's engineering and oversaw the development of ChatGPT, developer APIs and more, is being promoted to another brand new C suite executive role, CTO of B2B applications. Narayanan will oversee all the business side applications covering startups, enterprises and government, and he'll report directly to OpenAI COO Brad Lightcap. Kevin Weil, OpenAI's CPO, will be transitioning onto the research side of OpenAI's business, the company confirmed. He'll be spinning up a new team at the company as its VP of AI for science, working closely with Mark Chen, OpenAI's chief research officer, as part of that transition. Wheel's former product team, including head of ChatGPT Nick Turley, will now report directly to Fiji. Simo OpenAI's new CEO of applications.