Brian McCullough (0:04)

Welcome to the TechMe Ride Home for Wednesday, June 4th, 2025. I'm Brian McCullough. Today windsurf accuses anthropic of blocking it from AI models and a sign that competition in the AI coding space is fierce. But will the real battle happen when the likes of Microsoft and Google really go after the startups? NotebookLM is now shareable, Pump Fun is raising big money, and Nintendo didn't Send out any Switch 2 review units. What are they afraid of? Here's what you missed today in the world of tech. Windsurf says Anthropic is limiting its direct access to its AI models, including the newest Claude 4 family and the highly popular Claude 3 models, which is a big deal because Claude is popular with coders, I'm led to believe. Quoting TechCrunch, Windsurf CEO Varun Mohan said in a post on X Tuesday that Anthropic gave Windsurf little notice for this change and the startup now has to find other third party compute providers to run several of Anthropic's most popular AI models on its platform. We have been very clear to Anthropic that this is not our desire. We wanted to pay them for the full capacity, said Mohan on X. We are disappointed by this decision and short notice. In a blog post, Windsurf said it has some capacity with third party inference providers, but not enough, so this change may create short term availability issues for WindServe users trying to access Claude. The decision comes just a few weeks after Anthropic seemed to pass over Windsurf during the launch of Claude 4, the company's new family of models which offer industry leading performance on software engine. On launch day, Windsurf said it did not receive direct access from anthropic to run Claude4 on its platform and still hasn't. This forced the company to rely on a workaround that's more expensive and complicated for developers to access Claude 4. Meanwhile, other popular AI coding tools, including any Sphere's cursor, Cognition's Devon and Microsoft's GitHub Copilot, seem to have direct access to Claude 4 models at launch. The AI assisted coding sector, also known as Vibe coding, has heated up in recent months. OpenAI reportedly closed on a deal to acquire Windsurf in April at the same time, and Anthropic, whose AI models are a favorite among developers, has invested more in its own AI coding applications. In February, Anthropic launched its own AI coding application, Claude Code, and in May the startup held its first code with Claude developer conference. Yeah, the competition with OpenAI and the whole excitement around the coding space makes that interesting. But I led with this story so that I could talk about something I've been thinking about. Sure, AI coding startups are hot now, but couldn't all these startups be potential roadkill? Not just OpenAI but Google and Microsoft have popular AI coding tools and platforms, a Source says Microsoft's GitHub Copilot grew to more than $500 million in revenue last year, quoting Reuters Founders of Code Gen startups and their investors believe they are in a land grab situation with a shrinking window to gain a critical mass of users and establish their AI coding tools as the industry standard. But because most are built on AI foundation models developed elsewhere, such as OpenAI, Anthropic or Deep seq, their costs per query are also growing and none are yet profitable. They're also at risk of being disrupted by Google, Microsoft and OpenAI, which all announced new Code Gen products in May. And Anthropic is also working on 1 as well, 2 sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The rapid growth of these startups is coming despite competing on big tech's home turf. Microsoft's GitHub Copilot, launched in 2021 and considered Cogen's dominant player, grew to over $500 million in revenue last year, according to a source familiar with Microsoft. Declined to comment on GitHub CoPilot's revenue on Microsoft's earnings call in April, though the company said the product has over 15 million users. Google CEO also said in April that well over 30% of Google's code is now AI generated, and Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said last year that the company had saved the equivalent of 4,500 developer years by using AI. In May, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said at a conference that approximately 20 to 30% of their code is now AI generated. The same month, the company announced layoffs of workers globally, with over 40% of those being software developers in Microsoft's home state of Washington. Some Vibe coding platforms already boast substantial annualized revenues. Cursor, with just 60 employees, went from 0 to 100 million in recurring revenue by January 2025, less than two years since its launch. Windsurf, founded in 2021, launched its code generation product in November 2024 and is already bringing in $50 million in annualized revenue, according to a source familiar with the company. Both startups operate with negative gross margin they spend more than they make, according to four investor sources familiar with their operations. The prices people are paying for coding assistance are going to get more expensive, quinn Slack, CEO at coding startup sourcegraph, told Reuters. Both Cursor and Windsurf are led by recent MIT graduates in their 20s and exemplify the gold rush era of the AI startup scene. I haven't seen people working this hard since the first Internet boom, said Martin Casado, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, an investor in Anysphere, the company behind Cursor. What's less clear is whether the dozen or so codegen companies will be able to hang on to their customers as big tech moves in. In many cases, it's less about who's got the best technology, it's about who's going to make the best use of that technology and who's going to be able to sell their products better than others, said Scott Rainey, managing director at redpoint Ventures, whose firm invested in Sourcegraph and Poolside, a software development startup that's building its own AI foundation model. Most of the AI coding startups currently rely on the Claude AI model from anthropic, which crossed $3 billion in annualized revenue in May in part due to fees paid by Codegen companies. But some start are attempting to build their own models. In May, Windsurf announced its first in house AI models that are optimized for software engineering. In a bid to control the user experience, Cursor has also hired a team of researchers to pre train its own large frontier level models, which could enable the company to not have to pay foundation model companies so much money, according to two sources familiar with the matter. End Quote Google's NotebookLM now lets users share notebooks publicly People can interact with a public notebook by asking questions or exploring the generated content. Quoting the Verge Though viewers can't edit what's in your notebook, they can still use it to ask questions and interact with AI generated content like audio overviews, briefings and FAQs. First launched as an experiment in 2023, NotebookLM has become a breakout hit for Google. The app is designed to help you understand material from a variety of sources such as notes, documents, presentation slides, and even YouTube videos. It can provide AI generated summaries of the content, generate AI podcast style discussions, chat with you about the material, and more. Google launched a mobile notebook LM app last month. The steps to making your notebook available publicly are pretty similar to the way you share something in Google Drive Docs, sheets and slides. You just select the share button in the top right corner of the notebook and then change the access to anyone with a link from there, hit the Copy Link button and then paste the notebook link into a text, email, or even on social media if you want more people to interact with the information. Google also lets you share your notebooks with others by entering their email addresses. Unlike with public link sharing, you can give individual users the ability to edit your notebook. You can share audio overviews from within the Gemini app as well. End Quote Sort of an interesting raise, Sort of an IPO in a way. Sources say Pump Fun plans to raise $1 billion via a token sale at a $4 billion valuation. Pump Fund has generated over $700 million in cumulative revenue since its launch in early 2024. Quoting Blockworks, the token will be sold to both public and private investors, sources added. Blockworks could not immediately confirm when the token is set to go live or whether it will be issued on the Pump Fund platform. However, a post on X teased that it could come in the next two weeks. The potential $4 billion token valuation would mint Pump Fun as crypto's latest unicorn startup. After a year in which it helped ignite a Meme coin frenzy. Pump Fun, a meme coin launchpad that allows anyone to their own Solana token instantly and for free, was a breakout hit with crypto users. After launching in early 2024, the app has already generated over $700 million in cumulative revenue, according to Blackworks Research data. Users on the platform have minted nearly 11 million new tokens, with a current cumulative market cap of roughly $4.5 billion. As competition heats up among token launchpads, Pump Fund has made some updates to its core business, most notably when it launched an AMM that ended its unofficial partnership with Radium. P has also recently launched a mobile app and re released a live streaming feature it had temporarily suspended after content moderation complaints late last year. If you bypass security to save yourself some time, you're probably not alone. But fortunately, with One Password, extended access management, security and productivity no longer have to be at odds. Work happens everywhere. We send emails from our phones and edit documents on our personal tablets and laptops. 1Password 1Password Extended Access Management ensures that whatever device your employees use for work, it's healthy and uncompromised. For example, did you know most ransomware attacks stem from unmanaged devices? That's why 1Password's device trust solution blocks unsecured and unknown devices before they access your company's apps. And don't worry, 1Password still protects against the biggest attack source compromised credentials. Its industry leading password manager helps employees create strong, unique logins for every app with one Password. You get access to detailed reports on vulnerable passwords, employee, device health and credentials affected by data breaches so you can extend protection beyond the office walls. Check compliance off your list with the ability to enforce policy and identity safeguards so only trusted users on secure devices can gain access to business Data. I've trusted 1Password for all my businesses for over a decade now. They're amazing. Join me go to 1Password comm/ride to secure every app, device and identity, even the unmanaged ones. Right now, my listeners get a free two week trial at 1Password.com Ride all lowercase that's 1Password.com Ride when you're starting off with something new, it seems like your to do list keeps growing every day with new tasks, and that list can easily begin to overrun your life. Finding the right tool that not only helps you out, but simplifies everything can be such a game changer for millions of businesses. That tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e commerce in the US from household names like Mattel and Gymshark to my own resumewriters.com get started with your own design studio. With hundreds of ready to use templates, Shopify helps you build a beautiful online store to match your brand's style. Accelerate your content creation. Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions, page headlines, and even enhance your product photography. Get the word out like you have a marketing team behind you. Easily create email and social media campaigns wherever your customers are scrolling or strolling. And best yet, Shopify is your commerce expert with world class expertise in everything from managing inventory to international shipping to processing returns and beyond. Turn your big business idea into With Shopify on your side, sign up for your $1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com ride go to shopify.com ride shopify.com ride the Journal has a piece taking a look at how Morgan Stanley is using AI to tackle a major challenge common to a lot of big enterprises converting outdated legacy code into modern languages. We've been talking about this a lot recently. In January, Morgan Stanley launched DevGen AI, a tool built in house. Using OpenAI's GPT models, DevGen AI translates legacy code like COBOL into plain English specifications, making it easier for developers to rewrite. According to Mike Pizzi, the firm's global head of technology and operations, the tool has already reviewed 9 million lines of code and saved developers 280,000 hours while modernizing old software is crucial for security and innovation. It's long been a tough problem for AI tools until now, apparently. Quote the latest AI coding tools are excellent at writing new, modern code, but they don't necessarily have as much expertise in less popular or older programming languages or in those customized for a given company, Pizzi said. It's an area many tech companies are working on, but at the moment their offerings don't have the flexibility enterprises need, he added. That's why Morgan Stanley opted not to wait. We found that building it ourselves gave us certain capabilities that we're not really seeing in some of the commercial products, pizzi said. The off the shelf tools might yet evolve to deliver those capabilities, he said, but we saw the opportunity to get the jump early. Morgan Stanley, he said, was able to train the tool on its own code base, including languages that are no longer or never were in widespread use. Now, the company's roughly 15,000 developers based around the world can use it for a range of tasks, including translating legacy code into plain English specs, isolating sections of existing code for regulatory inquiries and other asks, and even fully translating smaller sections of legacy code into modern code. But when it comes to full translation, the technology still has some room to mature, he said. It can technically rewrite code from an old language like Perl into a new one like Python, but it wouldn't necessarily know how to write it as efficient code that takes advantage of all Python's capabilities, he said. And that's one big reason humans are staying in the loop, he said. Where the tool really shines is in translating legacy code into English specs, basically a map of what the code does, according to Pizzi. It's something an ever dwindling pool of developers trained on super old or specific coding languages knows how to do. With those specs, any developer can then write the old code as new code in a modern programming language, he said. Pizzi said you're not going to see fewer heads in software engineering, just more code, including more AI apps that will help Morgan Stanley deliver on its business goals. Currently, the company has hundreds of AI use cases in production aimed at growing the business, automating workflows and doing it more efficiently. But none of that is possible without a modern, standardized, well thought out architecture, Pizzi said. You're always modernizing in tech, he said. Today, with AI, this becomes even more important. End quote. Finally today, this is odd. Nintendo says it didn't send any Switch 2 review units to outlets as important features and updates will only be available via an Update on its June 5 launch quoting video Games Chronicle it's official for the first time in more than 20 years, there will be no pre release reviews for a new Nintendo console. According to a company spokesperson, Nintendo decided not to send Switch two review units to press ahead of launch because important features and updates will only be available via a system update on the day of the Consol console's official release June 5th. It did not say what these updates entail or explain why the media wasn't offered the opportunity to review its launch games like Mario Kart World and Switch to Welcome Tour at in person events instead, like it did with previous console launches such as the Wii. Neither did it explain why critics can't be trusted to cover products with knowledge that additional functionality will be patched later, as they're frequently used to. How and when game creators decide to distribute their review products is of course their prerogative, and the media has no right to early samples. Game coverage has also change drastically over the past decade, with more priority given to post release coverage of today's increasingly complex video games. But a lack of coverage at or before release is bad for you, our readers. When Switch 2 arrives, there will have been no reviews of its software, no analysis of its hardware performance or battery life, or any testing of its key features such as game chat or how backwards compatible Switch 1 games perform. No hidden gems will be unearthed and no potential dodgy ports highlighted before you have a chance of spending your hard earned money. And when reviews do arrive well after launch day, many critics will have been incentivized to rush through their games as quickly as possible, with Google and social media rewarding speed over quality. But it's not just the media that misses out. More than 20 Switch 2 launch games from third parties have now effectively been prevented from generating any day one review coverage for their titles. Many publishers have reached out to sites like VGC asking for clarification around when the press would receive review units, and some even said they wished they'd chosen to release their games later, after it became clear they would not be able to secure authentic editorial coverage at all. Perhaps it really was a technical nightmare for Nintendo to provide pre launch review access to press. We're already seeing, for example, that those who have somehow gained access to the console pre launch cannot use them at all until a future system update. And there's certainly no precedent of Nintendo being adversarial with press reviews in my experience. In fact, it's historically been one of the most critic friendly companies, often supplying software many weeks in advance, and I don't personally believe the decision to hold back reviews comes from a lack of confidence in its launch lineup either. My recent time playing Mario Kart World and Switch 2 welcome Tour at Nintendo's UK office was great fun and had me excited to spend more time at the games. But consoles have launched with Day One patches for over a decade and the media are well used to covering unfinished products. So in my opinion, this decision is more likely related to Nintendo's paranoia around leaks, as it is with any missing functionality before launch day. Those leaked videos of early consoles that can't run games certainly strengthening that hypothesis. Yeah, this sort of feels like when movie studios won't let reviewers see the movie before opening day. It smells fishy. I'm gonna make a tiny point that will be unimportant for most of you, but controversial to a very specific subset of this audience. I think that new Mario Kart game looks bad. It looks like they might have broken the game's classic formula. Classic Mario Kart is about chaos for sure. Bananas, red shells, bombs and the like, but it's still a racing game at heart. You're still racing on actual tracks, actual courses where the driving environment has actually been thought out. The videos of the gameplay of the new Mario Kart don't really show courses. I mean, they're kind of courses, but they're wide open and you just kind of go forward and just hope to survive the chaos erupting all around you. It's like they've de emphasized the actual driving, the actual racing part of the game. Instead of driving amid chaos, it's now just all chaos. Don't know. I haven't played it yet, obviously, but I have watched an hour or two of gameplay videos on YouTube and it doesn't look fun to me. I hope I'm wrong, and I say this as someone who has played and plays Mario Kart once or twice a week with my college buddies have done so since the Switch came out. What was it, seven years ago? So. So I'm worried. Talk to you tomorrow.