How the creator economy is making you talk like the internet

Summary

Podcast Summary: TED Radio Hour – “How the creator economy is making you talk like the internet”

Date: November 14, 2025
Host: Manoush Zomorodi
Guest: Adam Aleksic (“Etymology Nerd”), linguist, author, and social media influencer

---

Episode Overview

This episode explores how the creator economy and the algorithms that power social media platforms are fundamentally reshaping not just how people make a living, but how we talk. Manoush Zomorodi and Adam Aleksic delve into "algospeak"—the ways platforms incentivize new styles of expression, slang, and even voice. They discuss how language evolves rapidly online, how memes and trends spread, the consequences for culture (good, bad, and weird), and why paying attention to these changes matters.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. The Rise of the Creator Economy and Algospeak

• Over half of Gen Z in the US aspires to be influencers, making a living from short-form online content (01:11).
• Adam Aleksic (aka "Etymology Nerd") has built a career by decoding how language spreads on the internet, amassing over 3 million followers.
• “Algospeak”: Language shaped by the pressures and incentives of social media algorithms. Creators intentionally adjust their style, word choices, and delivery to maximize reach.

Quote:
"I speak in what I call an educational influencer accent. I'll talk very quickly, I'll stress more words to keep you watching my video. And all of that is part of this expected way to talk through the algorithm."
— Adam Aleksic (01:28)

2. How Algorithms Shape Language and Communication

• Algorithms do not merely distribute content—they affect how creators communicate (10:44).
• Social media content must be fast-paced, simple, and attention-grabbing to succeed.
• Euphemisms like “unalive” replace forbidden words (“kill”) for algorithmic compliance—and these words spread beyond the platform (06:41, 07:22).
• Trending words and phrases (e.g., "slay," "riz," "skibidi") are both a medium for and result of viral culture and platform metadata.

Quote:
"We are entering an entirely new era of language change driven by social media algorithms."
— Adam Aleksic (TED Talk excerpt, 08:38)

3. How Virality Drives Linguistic Change

• Words that trends—or have a “story”—spread much faster now.
• Creators optimize content with strong hooks, second-person pronouns, and relatable narratives (03:29–03:53).
• The importance of “trend-hopping”: Creators analyze, explain, and even create trends for engagement.

Example:
Adam's viral “chai vs. tea” video (16 million+ views) succeeded because it used a storytelling hook and invited user identification (02:36–03:29).

4. Platform-Specific Censorship and Workarounds

• Literal censorship triggers linguistic workarounds: Words like “unalive,” born out of TikTok’s moderation regime, end up adopted offline and by younger generations (06:41–07:44).

Quote:
"The middle schoolers don't know this. They see the word online or hear it from friends and assume it's a word like any other." (08:06)

5. Acceleration and Amplification of Slang

• Songs, memes, and hashtags spread words and behaviors “like a virus”; success for one piece of content incentivizes copycats (16:46–19:07).
• Example: Words like “riz,” “gyat,” and “skibidi” explode thanks to algorithmic promotion.

Quote:
"The algorithm is the culprit. But influencers are the accomplices." (18:30)

6. Algorithmic Personalization: For You, or for Them?

• While users believe they “train” the algorithm, personalization is ultimately for the platform’s commercial benefit (11:44–12:48).
• Platforms monetize attention; viral content is what benefits the platform, not necessarily the user.

7. Generational Labels and Category Creation

• The algorithm encourages hyper-categorization (Gen Z, “cottagecore,” etc.) for targeted content and advertising (35:40–40:12).
• Identity and group trends become more pronounced—and more commodified.

Quote:
"If I'm a demisexual goblincore Gen Z Swifty... those are all little identifiers, little pieces of metadata about myself as a user."
— Adam Aleksic (39:04)

8. Media Theory: From Printing Press to Algorithms

• Aleksic frames the algorithm as a new “medium,” analogous to printing, radio, TV, and the internet.
• The medium is not neutral; it affects what language spreads and persists, and what does not (25:09–28:15).

9. Emerging Accents and Voice Trends

• Not just what we say, but how we say it: The “influencer accent,” “lifestyle accent,” or “educational accent” are strategies for engagement (29:45–31:41, 30:00–30:31).

Quote:
"There's actually a bunch of different types of influencer accents... It has that uptalk, it has the rising tone..."
— Adam Aleksic (29:45)

10. Language Change and Social Group Dynamics

• Slang both distinguishes in-groups and disappears when adopted by out-groups (21:04–21:41).
• Words with more subtle, lasting shifts (e.g., “low key”) may have greater future impact on the language than obvious memes.

11. Dark Sides of Algorithmic Language

• Extreme and polarizing language is algorithmically rewarded; moderate voices get lost (46:05–47:32).
• Hate-group terminology can “launder” into mainstream via algorithmic spread—e.g., “pilled” from incel culture (48:58).
• The same pipeline that spreads fun memes can also radicalize or harm.

12. Algorithmic Literacy and Optimism

• Younger generations show more media savvy—aware of curation and manipulation by the platforms (48:14).
• Nonetheless, the pressure for engagement and temptation toward extremism remains.

Quote:
"Older generations are maybe more concerningly illiterate of the new medium... Young people generally have a decent understanding of, of, oh, this could be AI. This might not be real."
— Adam Aleksic (48:14)

13. Advice for the Future

• Aleksic encourages consuming “time-biased” (books, oral tradition) and “space-biased” (viral, fast) media for balanced literacy (41:48–42:12).
• He points to the necessity of code-switching—adapting mode, tone, vocabulary to context and medium (42:46).

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments (with Timestamps)

• On algorithmic optimization:
  “There's sort of a deal with the devil that has to happen, right? You have to accept as a creator... I'm playing into what the algorithm is rewarding.” (19:20)

• On generational buckets:
  “It's so strange to me that we put ourselves in buckets like that and they actually serve as algorithmic trend bait...” (36:26)

• On the "core" phenomenon:
  “TikTok algorithm has decided that words like cottagecore qualify as trending metadata... You might even start to identify with a cottagecore aesthetic. But here's the thing. It's all fake." (37:33–38:40)

• On code-switching:
  “A good communicator should know to adapt to different media and to different types of people and to different social settings. And we are constantly code switching all around us.” (42:46)

• On media variety:
  “I really hope that we come to realize as a culture that we should not just be relying on algorithms for our news... It's good to get news from as many places as possible and build a greater picture of reality.” (50:54)

• Signature sign-off:
  “Thanks for coming to my TED Talk.” (51:53)

---

Important Segments & Timestamps

• Creator economy/Algorithmic virality explained: 01:08–04:24
• Algospeak and euphemisms (“unalive”): 06:41–07:44, 08:06
• TED Talk segment on unalive and language change: 07:51–09:26
• Impact of personalization, for-who personalization serves: 11:44–12:48
• Demure, nonchalance, memeification of words: 15:36–16:26
• Rizzler song, meme virality, “skibidi” and “riz”: 16:46–20:19
• Algorithmic “in-group / out-group” cycle: 21:04–21:41
• Media theory (printing press, radio, etc.): 25:09–28:15
• Influencer accent and voice: 29:45–31:41
• Generational labeling, "core" phenomenon: 35:40–40:12
• Cultural and political ramifications (extremism, radicalization): 46:05–49:52
• Algorithmic literacy, mixing media, code-switching: 48:14–42:46

---

Takeaways

• Algorithms are actively shaping not just what goes viral, but how we communicate and what language “succeeds” online.
• Slang is incubated, accelerated, and sometimes commodified by these dynamics, with memes and in-jokes gaining dictionary status in record time.
• Censorship and content moderation create euphemisms that travel offline.
• Generational, aesthetic, and even consumer identities are being manufactured and reinforced as algorithmic “metadata,” creating new opportunities—and dangers—for personalization and polarization.
• There are risks: echo chambers, the spread of extremist terminology, and the flattening or commercialization of identity and language itself.
• The solution, Aleksic suggests, is literacy—awareness of the algorithm’s influence—and a deliberate practice of media variety and code-switching for a richer, more resilient language and culture.

---

For More

• Follow Adam Aleksic as “Etymology Nerd”
• Read his book: Algospeak: How Social Media Is Transforming the Future of Language
• See his talk at ted.com

---

“We should be aware when the way we're talking may have been conditioned by the algorithm... We should be aware when our language regurgitates extremist rhetoric. And we should be aware when that language can be used to harm other people...” — Adam Aleksic (51:12)

Transcript

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

This message comes from US Bank Simplify how you do business with business essentials. A powerful combination of no monthly maintenance fee, checking and card payment processing. Deposit products are offered by US Bank national association member fdic.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

This is the TED Radio Hour each week groundbreaking TED Talks.

[Adam Alexik]

Our job now is to dream big.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Delivered at TED Conferences to bring about the future we want to see around the world to understand who we are. From those talks we bring you speakers and ideas that will surprise you.

[Adam Alexik]

You just don't know what you're gonna find challenge you. We truly have to ask ourselves like why is it noteworthy and even change you.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

I literally feel like I'm a different person. Yes. Do you feel that way? Ideas worth spreading from TED and npr. I'm Minouche Zamorodi. Today on the show, Part two of our exploration of the creator economy, how people are making money, creativity and what creativity even means in the age of AI.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

This is day one of becoming a full time travel influencer.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

I eat out a lot to hear is everywhere I ate this past week if given the opportunity. More than half of Gen Z in the US say they'd like to be a social media influencer, making a living by creating content, often in the form of short videos online.

[Adam Alexik]

Like Adam Alexik, I speak in a what I call an educational influencer accent. I'll talk very quickly, I'll stress more words to keep you watching my video. And all of that is part of this expected way to talk through the algorithm.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Adam calls himself Etymology Nerd on social media, where he has over 3 million followers across platforms like TikTok and Instagram.

[Adam Alexik]

I studied linguistics in college, and the classic question you ask yourself when you're graduating with a linguistics degree is, well, what do I do next? Yeah, I thought, you know, I might as well give social media a try. Made a bird.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

Language, it's called.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Adam started posting about language three years ago.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

The octave indicates mood, the semitone indicates.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Including an early series about his own habit of communicating like a bird. Other videos explained phonetics.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

I'm pretty sure the first syllable, like.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

The sounds Singer Cardi B makes, obviously.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

The r is held longer than a regular trill.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

All the while he watched as the audience grew, thanks to, yes, his endearing nerdiness, but also how the algorithm responded.

[Adam Alexik]

Uses one of two words for t and which one they use depends on.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

How the word take. One of his most popular videos, which explains why some of us use the word chai while others call it now cha.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

Spread along land trade routes.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

This video has been watched over 16 million times.

[Adam Alexik]

I think I've known about this thing since high school and I didn't even consider making a video about it for the longest time because I thought, wow, everybody knows this, but I guess people don't.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

In the video, Adam stands in front of a map pointing out centuries old trade routes.

[Adam Alexik]

Every language basically has one of these two words. The word chai spread by land along Silk Road landed trade routes.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

The word chai in languages like Hindi.

[Adam Alexik]

Russian, Persian, and then the word tea spread along ocean trade routes.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

Now every country in Europe wants to get their hands on some tea, so they start trading with the Dutch through ocean trade routes.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

There's an intense, slightly manic feel to the whole thing, like he's rushing through this history lesson even though every word he says has been chosen with care.

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, I think I opened with a hook.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

First there's the intro.

[Adam Alexik]

Oh, you didn't know about how every country uses one of two words for t. So right off the bat, I use the word you, which is a second person pronoun, which always goes more viral because people like videos about them. So if I just said as an intro instead, this is a video about chai and tea that's not going to go viral, even if it's the exact same content, the exact same, like, idea.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Then there's the storyline.

[Adam Alexik]

It's maybe slightly reductive, like Polish has the word erbata, but I'm sort of simplifying the story because simple storytelling is so important to go viral on social media, you cannot have multiple narratives. You have to tell one narrative at a time.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

On social media and his delivery, I.

[Adam Alexik]

Am talking quickly using my educational influencer accent. I am pointing around in the map and kind of moving around, like creating visual disruptions and all that kind of is part of how you go viral.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

But also in addition to history lessons, Adam turns the spotlight on words his followers are using to right now.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

You know how the phrase he cooked.

[Adam Alexik]

Is a good thing, but the phrase.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

He'S cooked, which seemed to change by the day.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

The most interesting thing about the word skibidi is that the thing about W.

[Adam Alexik]

Riz is that W doesn't mean his.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Special sauce is explaining to his users why they talk the way they do.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

Slay was training in early 2022, but.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

The algorithm likes it too. So is he working the algorithm or is the algorithm working him working Everyone who makes and consumes content. Today on the show, we're continuing our series exploring the creator economy, how we're buying and selling creativity, and how it's changing what we value. Last time we looked at the business side with entrepreneur and artist Yancy Strickler. This time, how the creator economy is influencing our culture and language. So in the last couple years, Adam has parlayed his videos into a multi hyphenate career.

[Adam Alexik]

I'm a linguist, influencer, and author of AlgoSpeak.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

At 24, he makes what he calls a decent salary for a college grad who majored in a relatively obscure field.

[Adam Alexik]

In college, my research was more focused on government and linguistics, and my undergrad stuff was all about language nationalism in Serbia and Croatia. Oh, so that's how I ended up in that line of work.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

I really don't mean to be impertinent by asking. I know some people will say, like, how can this guy, he's like in his early 20s. How can he call himself a linguist?

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Of course, some people might come across you and think, oh, my God, anybody can be an expert about anything.

[Adam Alexik]

It is true that I have an undergrad degree in linguistics, not a graduate degree. I think what I'm doing is actually uniquely suited to studying slang etymology, because to really understand what it means for. For something to spread online, you have to be online yourself. And I definitely never knew I'd end up studying social media linguistics. But it just happened that I started making videos about language, about etymology on these platforms, and I started noticing my own speech being restricted a little bit. I started noticing how I would reroute my language around platform constraints.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Can you give me an example of that? Like what?

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, well, you can't say the word kill on TikTok. I mean, I guess you can, but it's suppressed. Your video's gonna be shown to fewer people, so people turn to alternatives like on a. What happens after you unalive me?

[Minouche Zamorodi]

I had not heard of unalive until I read your book, actually. Clearly, I don't hang out with enough young, young people. But, like, people started saying unalive instead of someone was killed or dead to get around censorship or get around restrictions on language on these platforms.

[Adam Alexik]

Exactly. It's a more platform safe alternative, so a new one steps in until the.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Next generation learns the definition.

[Adam Alexik]

As far as we can tell, the word unalive started in 2013 with an ultimate Spider man meme that then turned into a Roblox meme in the late 2010s that then started being used by the mental health community on TikTok. But then I also found that people were using the word unalive offline. There are kids in middle Schools who talk about Hamlet contemplating unaliving himself in.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

Their classroom essays or a classroom discussion, or on the unaliving that happens in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Here's Adam Malekzik on the TED stage.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

And these aren't hypothetical situations. These are actual examples drawn from the thousand plus middle school teachers I've surveyed about this word. Clearly, for such a recent word, unalive shows up in an impressive range of scenarios, but the main function appears to be euphemistic. Many kids use the word when they're uncomfortable talking about topics like death, since unalive sounds like a less scary word. And in many ways this is nothing new. We've been euphemizing death as long as we've had language. The word decease, for example, comes from Latin decesus, which was a euphemism for the previous Latin word for death, mors. Apparently even the stoic Romans were as queasy about death as today's middle schoolers. But there is a crucial difference between unalive and decease, and that's that we only got the word on alive because you can't say kill on TikTok. They have a mysterious algorithm that removes or suppresses any post that might violate their community guidelines. So people got around with that with the word on alive. The middle schoolers don't know this. They see the word online or hear it from friends and assume it's a word like any other. And fair enough, you probably didn't know where the word deceased came from, unless you're some kind of etymology nerd. But decease didn't happen because it was impossible to carve the word Morse into an ancient Roman tablet. We are entering an entirely new era of language change driven by social media algorithms.

[Adam Alexik]

The algospeak. That's what it's traditionally called. This sort of platform circumvention is only the tip of the iceberg of how these platforms are affecting our language. I also noticed myself playing into viral trends. I look at other influencers doing this too. I look at attention grabbing language because these platforms are designed to monetize your attention. And all the incentive structure is there for influencers to replicate. How do we grab people's attention? So language is also kind of revolving more around ephemeral trends and what grabs attention. And we have algorithms creating in groups and echo chambers through how they categorize users. And these ingroups actually serve as incubators for language formation. And all of this is sort of what I call algospeak, the Expanded definition that our language is broadly being shaped by social media algorithms. Right.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Now, can we talk about the first part of that word? Algospeak, algo meaning algorithms. Right. Like, let's talk about the algorithm. As a former tech reporter, I'm like, well, it's not the algorithms. There's like millions of algorithms. Right, like, but, but when people use it, what are they referring to? And can you walk us through what exactly you have noticed or how you've learned about how it does work in certain places?

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, and I'm so glad you brought up that it's not the algorithm, because one of the biggest tendencies we have when talking about the algorithm is to simplify it, to personify it, and that makes it feel more normal, what's happening. I guess it is a lot of different algorithms. How users are classified is one algorithm. How content is classified is another algorithm. And actually even within those algorithms, there's a bunch of sub algorithms that are all doing their own thing with content classification. So there's a lot of different processes running at the same time. And all of these are playing a part in the greater machination of how a video ends up from someone uploading it onto your for you feed.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

I mean, I'm thinking of myself. I love how I have bullied the algorithm on Instagram into only giving me nature and pets. I've protected my experience on that platform, but it obviously knows I'm a middle aged woman who likes to go on long walks and doesn't want to look at the news when she's on Instagram. Yeah, yeah, tell me about, like, is that what basically what we're talking about here?

[Adam Alexik]

There's a lot of sense that you can train your algorithm, that you can personalize it. It is, after all, called the for you page. And people often say things like, oh, you know, I built my own for you page, or the algorithm really knows me. And I think this is also playing into that idea of training your algorithm. It is a SIMP simplified story. Yes, you partially have trained some aspect of what content is being recommended to you. But also on your Instagram feed that is mostly, you know, outdoors content, every third video is probably an advertisement and you don't actually want to see the advertisement. So is the algorithm really for you? No, it's kind of both for you and for the platform's benefit. And every video that's shown to you, every video that shows up on the for you feed is actually something that benefits the platform, definitionally, because it gets your engagement, it gets your attention. So the things that spread are more for the platform than for you, but it's all kind of packaged under this guise of for you. And I think the personalization is one of the most dangerous things because we really forget what's going on on a broader level.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

In a minute. More with online linguist Adam Alexik on how social media algorithms are influencing influencers online.

[Adam Alexik]

It's constantly changing what priorities, incentives, it's rewarding and influencers have to just feel it out. They have to be aware of the algorithm by interacting with it on a daily basis.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

On the show today, the Creator Economy Part 2. I'm Minouche Zamorodi and you're listening to NPR's Ted Radio Hour. We'll be right back.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

This message comes from Schwab At Schwab. How you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices. You can invest and trade on your own. Plus get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award winning service, low costs and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth and your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice 2]

This message comes from Progressive Insurance and the name your price tool. It helps you find car insurance options in your budget. Try it [e-mail], progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Price and coverage match limited by state law. Not available in all states. This message comes from Progressive Insurance. Do you ever think about switching insurance companies to see if you could save some cash? Progressive makes it easy to see if you could save when you bundle your home and auto policies. Try [e-mail], progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states. Support for this podcast and the following message come from Recorded Future. Every day millions of cyber threats compete for attention, but only a few truly matter to your business. As a leading threat intelligence company, Recorded Future cuts through the noise with precision intelligence. That's why top banks and governments trust them, because security leaders don't just react, they foresee spotting the signals that others miss and acting before threats become setbacks. Recorded Future Know what matters act first.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

It's the TED Radio Hour from npr. I'm Minouche Zamorodi. On the show Part two of our look at the Creator Economy. Our guide today is creator Adam Aleksic. Adam is known as Etymology nerd to his 3 million followers online where he's cracked the code of how to go viral. His videos dissect how different people use different Words like demure. Demure is demure changed forever. Can you explain to people what's happened to demure?

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, there was a demure trend about being demure, mindful and cutesy in the workplace. Makeup for work. Very demure. Very playing into cultural ideas of reservedness. Not the green crease, not demure.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Demure used to mean modest and reserved.

[Adam Alexik]

I'm eating a salad.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Very demure. Then it trended on TikTok, where understatement became performative. How ironic.

[Adam Alexik]

Don't know how to keep it demure.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

For at least five years. It went everywhere, from teens to celebrities like the Kardashians and Jennifer Lopez.

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, there is this huge Gen Z aesthetic of nonchalance and demure was sort of making fun of that. But at the same time, I think some people used it genuinely.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

This new unique use of Demure made it Dictionary.com's word of the year in 2024.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

And it's not just new words to avoid algorithmic censorship, the very structure of social media is changing where words come from, how words get popular, and how quickly those words spread. I believe some of you might be familiar with this song.

[Adam Alexik]

I just want to be your Sticking.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

Out your gyat for the Rizzler. You're so skibidi you're so phantom tax I just want to be your sigma freaking come here, give me your Ohio. For those of you out of the loop, these are the lyrics to the Rizzler song, a meme that went massively viral last year. It's full of current middle school slang words like rizzo, gyat, and skibidi, and was instrumental in popularizing those words to a broader audience. Sticking out your gut for the Rizzler, you're so skibidi. Social media algorithms reward repetition. If a song is funny or catchy and people interact with it, the algorithm will then push that song to more people since it's proven to drive engagement on the app. The same is true of memes or words in general, since trending metadata like hashtags will also be pushed to people who previously shown interest in similar content. Creators are very aware of this, and we actively use trending audios or hashtags to make our videos perform better. In the wake of the Rizzler song, for example, we saw an explosion of people making videos with the words Rizzo, Gyat, and skibidi because they knew those videos would do well. And as a result, the word spread language has always been a little bit like a virus. Words are transmitted from one host to another, reproducing and changing as they infect different people along social networks. But now the literally viral nature of social media is accelerating this process from start to to finish. In the span of just a year, a word like riz can go from complete obscurity to becoming the Oxford English Dictionary word of the year. And the algorithm is the culprit. But influencers are the accomplices. We use whatever tricks we can to keep you entertained because that makes our videos do better, which helps us earn a living. Or this means that we often end up creating and spreading words that help the system.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Clearly you understand how the algorithm works in that you have been able to leverage it in a way that gets more people interested in the roots of language and explaining it to them. How did you do that?

[Adam Alexik]

Absolutely. There's sort of a deal with the devil that has to happen, right? You have to accept as a creator. Yes. I'm playing into what the algorithm is rewarding and they're going to reward, for example, trends. So I started talking about trending language, also analyzing the trending language, where it came from. It. You know, it's good for my business that the word skibidi goes viral because now I get to talk about the etymology of skibidi and because people are socially fascinated in this phenomenon. My video is going to go more viral than an analysis of the word chair or table or whatever that's less interesting to people.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Let's pause. Footnote. Skibidi. What's it mean? Where'd it come from? For those who don't know, like me.

[Adam Alexik]

I feel like at this point at least most people have heard of skibidi somewhere in the news. It was just added to the Cambridge dictionary. But skibidi is a nonsense word. It can be used completely randomly as an interjection that doesn't mean anything, but it could be an intensifier. So you could say skibidi. Rizz is like very intense rizz in either a good or a bad direction.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Meaning charisma. Just, you know, it's npr. We have an older audience.

[Adam Alexik]

No, very important to clarify.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice 2]

Yeah.

[Adam Alexik]

So these are all kinds of of called brain rot words. And it's this meme aesthetic of supposedly words that are bad for your brain. As a linguist, I have to say there is nothing actually about these words that is mentally deleterious at all. But it is sort of the catch all meme aesthetic of nonsensical repetition of algorithmic slang. And skibidi comes out of that YouTube short series. Riz comes from this Twitch streamer. Kai Sinat but both are kind of taking on this role of absurdity in the algorithmic kind of milieu. It's more of it's absurd because it's absurd because it's being recommended to us by the algorithm. And then middle schoolers start saying it because it sounds funny.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

And then when older people start saying it, they stop saying it.

[Adam Alexik]

Exactly. I think we're well past skibidi. I think skibidi is on its last throes right now. It may be in the dictionary, but it's getting less and less popular in the middle schools.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

In the middle schools? Yeah. I feel like these new words come up and I'm like, I can't. I don't know. By the time I understand it, they'll have moved on, so what's the point? But that's probably smart. Cause nobody wants to hear me saying skibidi anyway. Except they just did.

[Adam Alexik]

Well, you know, some of the trends that really stick out, I think they have shorter life spans because it is that thing that you mentioned. Once your grandmother starts saying skibidi, you no longer want to say skibidi yourself.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Hey, I'm not a grandma yet.

[Adam Alexik]

I wasn't calling you a grandmother.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Okay.

[Adam Alexik]

But there is that aspect to how trends die out, that once it starts being used by an out group, it initially had value because it was in the in group, and now it no longer has that value, so it no longer has any cachet as a joke. And then we make. And there's constantly new jokes percolating. I also think it's important to pay attention to the jokes that don't seem as obvious or don't even appear as jokes in the first place. I think these are the words that are actually going to change our language more permanently. Words that are percolating from usually minority groups or from more fringe phenomena. Those are the ones that actually end up influencing our language. So I talk about the distinction between skibidi and low key. So low key is this adverb. It's been around since the 1800s as a word meaning like muted or something. But it was recently popularized in an adverbial sense. And this is from African American English, where people would say, oh, that party was low key.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Good meaning, like chill.

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, well, low key, yeah. It kind of means, like, you know, nonchalant. I don't want to say it too much, being more low key about it. Right. It's muted. It's mutedness, reservedness.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Also the way you just use nonchalant. Not how I use nonchalant.

[Adam Alexik]

Oh, yeah. The word nonchalant is evolving as well. There's been an Internet meme since like 2023 about how people are using this. So I guess it's tough being a translator when you're also deep in the kind of algorithm yourself. But yeah. So low key, I think. And these changing definitions that we see with a lot of other words are also happening, but don't stick out as much as skibidi. And I think it's those words that don't stick out that are going to have a greater impact on our language hundreds of years from now.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

So what you're just saying actually is explaining a lot of my 15 year old daughter's behavior. I mean, teenagers, whatever, twas ever thus. Every generation has its own way of rebelling, but nonchalance is definitely a thing.

[Adam Alexik]

Oh, absolutely. Also important point about the 15 year olds. I think these kids are the bellwethers of where language is gonna go. They are the ones that are actually most flexible with their linguistic behaviors. The elementary schoolers aren't quite as tapped into social trends yet or as searching to create identities. And older people are more entrenched in our ideas of how language should be or what words are supposed to sound like. And middle schoolers are forming their identity. They're trying to differentiate themselves from adults and from previous generations. They're trying to build a collective kind of identity for themselves. And so they are more flexible with adopting language. So you should be paying attention to your 15 year old if you want to really understand what the state of the English language is right now.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

So I guess someone would say, like, yeah, but in my, you know, at my school, I remember there was like certain words. This is kind of gross. But in fourth grade there was a kid who would spit at people, but only using his glands under his tongue. And he called it a gleek.

[Adam Alexik]

Huh.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Super weird. But then it just took off. In the fourth grade it was like boys would gleek the girl that they liked. Gross. But also clearly good word. Cause it stuck with me for all these years. But that's always been the case. How is it different than social groups coming up with their own language? Or for that matter, the printing press, the radio.

[Adam Alexik]

I'm so glad we're bringing up the printing press and the radio because the medium is the message. The way we're talking is going to shape the way that trends diffuse. And I'm not going to say, oh, it's new that humans are using language to communicate or communicate come up with social trends. No, that is a fundamentally human Activity. And we will always do it, and we will always find new ways to do it. But the algorithm is now mediating that interaction in the same way that the classroom did with the word gleek. The story of language as a whole is told by what mediums we're using to communicate. Before we had parchment and papyrus and everything, we relied a lot more on oral communication. Stories would be told through rhyme and meter. And then we moved to parchment and paper. And people were really concerned about that at the time. I think Plato was concerned about brain rot from people not memorizing things as much. Then we start segmenting our stories differently with paper, right? We can have chapters. We can actually put spaces between words, as opposed to stone tablets, where all the words were smooshed together. And then we start mass producing things with the printing press. And the printing press now allows for vernacular language to reproduce and kind of solidify also at the same time, the traditional gatekeepers of who gets to control how we talk. And so for a while, the printing press is the dominant mode of communication. You have a lot of standard language being replicated in all these different languages, rather than just church Latin. And the Internet finally creates this opportunity for the written replication of informal speech. You have people using slang words. You have people writing in lowercase and using abbreviations. And this is sort of this revolution in who can talk and who can vote on what language is supposed to be like. And that sort of lays the foundation for what I think is the new inflection point. Algorithms govern the distribution of content. I don't know what type of videos I'm gonna post on here yet.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Okay, but why is your content not blowing up if you're doing everything right?

[Adam Alexik]

Things don't go viral unless they work for the algorithm. And what that means is that the language we're using is always sort of performing for the algorithm as well. And this is this medium that is always there, that is always shaping how ideas diffuse online. And that means any idea that diffuses is either good for the algorithm or it's created for the algorithm. That means using words like unalive, that means playing into trends like skibidi. That means a lot of creators are just incentivized to come up with new words or use trendy language, because the algorithm sees that language as metadata. In the past, metadata was something like a hashtag, something that gives you information about the content. Now the algorithm sees everything. The natural language processing, computer vision components, all sub algorithms, analyze that, and they create this numerical representation of what a video is. And they already know what the video is about, but the word is part of that. So we're incentivized to use words that aid in the distribution of our own video.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Hmm. Just to follow up on, you know, the classic Marshall McEwen idea of the medium is the message. The algorithm is the one that's shaping language. But to be clear, the algorithm is programmed by people, people who work for very large tech companies who want to monetize.

[Adam Alexik]

Absolutely. And they create those structures that are then replicated by other influencers down the line that, oh, you need engagement, you need retention, which is how long people watch a video. You need likes. And so now as an influencer, I'm trying to make all my videos to get people to watch the whole time, and I want to get likes. Otherwise the video is not going to be distributed. So I have to play into that. I also want to note that there's emergent social phenomena that aren't programmed just by these engineers. It's not purely like this top down process. There is social expectations that come with each medium.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

Live from NPR News in Washington, I'm.

[Adam Alexik]

Dave Mattingly on npr. You have like an NPR voice that's been studied. President Trump is making his first official trip of. Clearly, I am not good at adapting into this.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Oh, I think they've been trying to get rid of that for years, though.

[Adam Alexik]

But at the same time, here I am, you're speaking in a, maybe a more radio friendly voice. I'm speaking in a more algorithm friendly voice because that's what we. We've learned to talk when we're kind of communicating like this.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Wait, somebody might be like, what do you mean an algorithm friendly voice? Define that.

[Adam Alexik]

There's actually a bunch of different types of influencer accents, but you're probably familiar with the most famous sort of lifestyle influencer accent. The. Hey, guys, welcome to npr. Today we're gonna be talking about algorithms. It has that uptalk, it has the.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Rising tone because you're not getting any response from anyone. So you're like trying to have a conversation with yourself.

[Adam Alexik]

Exactly. This is a one sided communic. That is an important part of shaping it. But that's not all. You know, I could just continuously monotone deadpan into the camera and that wouldn't go viral because there's an expectation of how people are supposed to talk. And this sort of lifestyle influencer accent came out of the previous YouTube accent, which came out of the Valley Girl accent. So there's layers of social prestige in how we talk and there's an expectation of what the lifestyle influencer is supposed to sound like.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Now, wait, wait, wait. Are you saying that the human brain is attracted to those, and therefore it gets more listens, and therefore the algorithm continues to push it, or are you saying that the algorithm is hearing those intonations and pushing it harder on people?

[Adam Alexik]

No, I don't think the algorithm is picking up on accent intonations. I think there is actual human bias toward social prestige. We evaluate any kind of social situation through our lens of, like, is this something worth listening to? And then, like, our slight scroll patterns get replicated through what the algorithm recommends. The algorithm doesn't even need to analyze whether or not this person is speaking in a lifestyle influencer accent accent. It's merely telling that, oh, this viewer scrolled away quickly because this person wasn't speaking in a socially approved accent in their minds. And that means I'm gonna recommend this video to fewer users. And so there's sort of a selection that happens for socially desirable accents to replicate. And I also wanna clarify. That's only one type of accent that's the most stereotyped because, you know, women are scrutinized with language. I speak in what I call an educational influencer accent. I'll talk very quickly. I'll stress more words to keep you watching my video.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

I get the sense, though, that you were a fast always.

[Adam Alexik]

No, I definitely am a fast talker, and I'm definitely giving away myself here. But also, there is a perfection that I strive for in the videos where I'll retake certain clips if it seems like I don't have the right intonation on the right word, or if I stumble on my words if I don't talk fast enough. And so what now is still, like, a kind of more natural way of speaking for me. And I, again, would probably speak differently if I was in a larger group conversation where you don't need to. It's, like, more laid back, you know, it's more demure.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

You're so nonchalant, Adam.

[Adam Alexik]

My God, I don't want to be Shalant all the time. There's a time and a place to be Shalant, and there's a time to be nonchalant.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Wait, there's a. Hold on. There's a difference between shalant and nonchalant.

[Adam Alexik]

Well, nonchalant is being reserved and then.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

But shalant is not its own word. What?

[Adam Alexik]

But it is. It is now. It's a slang word that was popularized through, like, social media and people talk, meaning the opposite of nonchalant meaning you are overt about something.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Like jazz.

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah. You are excited about something. I'm shalant about language.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

You know, when I say jazzed, are you like, whoa, 87 or what?

[Adam Alexik]

I mean, I probably would just use the word shallant. Exactly.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

When we come back, Adam's concern and optimism for social media users, younger ones in particular. Plus Adam and I go viral maybe.

[Adam Alexik]

Oh, you didn't know about that?

[Minouche Zamorodi]

All right, how do we begin? Oh, sorry. Such a terrible guy. Today on the show the Creator economy and its effects on language. I'm Anoosha Zamorodi and you're listening to the TED Radio Hour from npr. Stay with us. Foreign.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

This message comes From NPR sponsor 1Password. Protect your digital life with 1Password. If you're tired of family members constantly texting you for the passwords to streaming services, 1Password lets you securely share or remove access to logins access from any device anytime. 1Password lets you securely switch between iPhone, Android, Mac and PC with convenient features like autofill for quick sign inside. Right now, get a free two week trial for you and your family at 1Password.com NPR this message comes from Mint Mobile. At Mint Mobile, their favorite word is no. No contracts, no monthly bills, no hidden fees. Plans start at $15 a month. Make the [e-mail] Switch that's mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment of $45 for three month. 5GB plan required equivalent to $15 a month. New customer offer for first three months only, then plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice 2]

This message comes from Mint mobile. Starting at $15 a month. Make the [e-mail] Switch $45 upfront payment for 3 months 5 gigabyte plan equivalent to $15 a month. Taxes and fees Extra first 3 months only. See terms.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

This message comes From NPR sponsor eBay, who is home to millions of parts for your next project and free returns if it doesn't fit or it isn't what you expected. EBay has your back. Eligible items only exclusions apply. EBay things people love.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

It's the TED Radio Hour from NPR. I'm Minouche Zamarodi. We've been talking to Adam Alexik about the creator economy. Adam calls himself a social media linguist. He's also the author of Algospeak How Social Media Is Transforming the Future of Language. And he has built his career explaining the cultural and generational divide on how we use words.

[Adam Alexik]

We didn't have the idea of a social generation in the 1800s this is like a new thing. People are coming back from World War I. We called them the lost generation. Oh, the people coming back from World War II, that's the GI generation. Then we have baby boomers. And then we actually don't know what to call you. The next generation. After that, we're like, well, I guess they don't have a desire to be defined, so we'll call them Gen X. And then we just keep running with the idea that generations exist. And then we have like Millennial. Yeah. Because it's 2000. And then, well, we don't know what to call Gen Z either. So we'll just do whatever was two after Gen X. And now we just ran out of the Alphabet. So we'll call it Gen Alpha. But I think influencers play into these labels because there is a human social fascination with being labeled. We love things like MBTIs and Zodiacs and the idea of belonging to a bucket and with a generation.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

And it's shorthand, right?

[Adam Alexik]

It is. It is shorthand. Obviously it's reductive, and I think people realize that. But we're using more generational language than we were before because it works. It works. To talk about the Gen Z fingerheart versus the millennial heart, or before Gen X, people will start a short form video. They'll. They'll do like a little breath in. It's so strange to me that we put ourselves in buckets like that and they actually serve as algorithmic trend bait to say that you are, oh, this is a Gen Z thing. This is. The Gen Z stare went viral. Recently. I did a video on the Boomer ellipses. There's always a random dot, dot, dot in the middle of their messages.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Oh, I do that.

[Adam Alexik]

I phrased it that way because I knew it would go viral. Like, why do boomers put dots in their text? Which is not a normal thing that young people do.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

So it's simply more efficient to separate ideas.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

But it's like trailing off in your language.

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, yeah. There's different texting etiquette among different generations. And again, to use that word generation already feels like. I mean, all of language is putting things into categories. But I think some categories are more reductive than others.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

For example, the suffix core has recently gotten very popular in Gen Z slang to describe specific aesthetics like cottagecore or goblincore or angel core. And on the surface level, these are cute. You watch a cottagecore video, you like it. Later on, you get more cottagecore content. You might even start to identify with a cottagecore aesthetic. But here's the thing. It's all fake. The entire reason these aesthetics exist is because TikTok algorithm has decided that words like cottagecore qualify as trending metadata. So creators respond by making more cottagecore content that propagates the word and then more people interact with it, which makes the word trendier. And this happens because social media outcome algorithms wants to make you identify with hyper compartmentalized labels, since they can then give you extremely specific commercialized content catering to that identity. Now that you're a cottagecore person, you feel special. Every time you get a cottagecore video.

[Adam Alexik]

You'Re like, cottagecore, oh, the algorithm really knows me.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

The algorithm gave you that identity. You might even start by buying cottagecore clothing or cottage core decorations to fit your new lifestyle as a cottagecore person. And that's exactly what they want. The craziest part is they're not even trying to hide this.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

This is at the heart of the capitalist maker economy.

[Adam Alexik]

No, this is such an important point to understand about how algorithms work. They want more categories. It's really good for them. If I'm a demisexual goblin. Core Gen Z Swifty, I don't even.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Know what you just said, but the.

[Adam Alexik]

Point is those are all little identifiers, little pieces of metadata about myself as a user. The algorithm actually doesn't need the words. But humans sense that they are trying to perform for the algorithm and they create these words and they actually circularly, emergently make more of a cluster of users who identify with this label and that it makes more for the algorithm to reward. And it's all part of this surveillance capitalism system where now they have more things to label about us, more ways to target us more specifically. If you look at TikTok's business page in 2021, it says that subcultures are the new demographics, and it gives businesses ideas for how to profit off things like cottagecore and the hashtag baddiethetic. And what's crazy to me about that page, they are using the word demographic because in the past a demographic was like race, age, gender, and now it's also whether you're cottagecore or not.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

So as a Gen Xer, part of me is like, like, dude, you're totally selling out. But I'm guessing that that was an extremely time specific way of testing you on why you are in the career you're in.

[Adam Alexik]

I think I'm extremely aware of the dissonance, I guess, that is required to be a creator talking about these words and caring about how algorithms are affecting our culture. I think it is possible to use these algorithms subversively, otherwise I would not. It's also, I think, very important to mix forms of media. If we're going back media theory, there's a scholar called Harold Innes who came before McLuhan in Canada. I think he has a fascinating point about space biased versus time biased communication. And time biased sticks with the cultural record like books and oral traditions. And so while it might take way longer to reach an audience that's the same size, space biased media fills up a lot of space really quickly, but doesn't stick around something like a newspaper or mass media or TV or. Or right now, algorithms are incredibly space biased. They fill our consciousness and then they go away. So it seems that both types of media have their pros and cons, right? Space biased media is very good for communicating to a big audience and time biased media is very good for maintaining some kind of cultural constancy or longevity. And so I think we should be mixing as much time biased and space biased media as possible, where we build a more holistic picture of society and reality by consuming and engaging with all these different types of media. So that's why I wrote a book.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Yeah, I did want to ask you that. Writing a book seems kind of retro in a way, but based on what you've just said, am I right to assume that you were happy to create it? Well, A, because you got paid and B, gets your ideas to more people. But C, it's more tangible, that it'll stand the test of time, maybe unlike some of your TikTok videos.

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, I don't think anybody's looking at my TikTok videos from 2023. Somebody might look at this book two years from now though. So there is a difference to how ideas can diffuse. And ideas will diffuse differently depending on the medium. So a lot of this is just built up layers of human social constructs. The NPR social construct of how we're supposed to talk versus the book social construct of how I'm supposed to write, which is informal English, mind you. And then there's the TikTok construct of how I'm supposed to talk. And each of these has different layer of respect or understanding of how I should be communicating.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

So who are you really, Adam?

[Adam Alexik]

I think a good communicator should know to adapt to different media and to different types of people and to different social settings. And we are constantly code switching all around us. You are a different person talking to your grandmother than talking to your best friend. And that is super normal. Your Grandmother's house is a different medium than the bar that you're hanging out with your friend at. So this is an aspect of human nature to switch with the medium, but kind of maintain conceptual constancy, I guess. Still have your own moral system and your own direction with what you're trying to do.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

I asked Adam to make a video with me. How do we begin? Oh, sorry. And use his formula to see if we could go viral.

[Adam Alexik]

The lighting's kind of bad.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

By playing to the algorithm, our first requirement. A trendy new word.

[Adam Alexik]

Oh, you didn't know about the word clanker?

[Minouche Zamorodi]

And you always need a good hook. Gen X versus Gen Z. No, I had no idea. I'm Gen X.

[Adam Alexik]

It's kind of a speculative slur for robots, so the idea that they would become more sentient in the future and they could be treated as a human minority today.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

The point of this video? To get people thinking about why we would even invent a slur for something that humans created, in this case, robots, which we are now calling clankers. As a slur.

[Adam Alexik]

Exactly. So the idea is a derogatory play on the idea of clanking as a robot, but also the N word itself. It comes from Star wars, where robots are seen as sort of a secondary race. And there's a lot of ideas about clankers being a lower class but sort of anthropomorphized citizen in the future.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

In some ways, that makes sense. Like, they're not humans, so shouldn't they be be treated as clankers?

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

You know, it's just the idea that.

[Adam Alexik]

In the future, they would become conscious, and we aren't recognizing that. It's sort of an online meme that's speculating about your daughter bringing home a clanker in the year 2060.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

So, like, 2060, my daughter's gonna bring home a robot who is really, really nice to her. Therefore, a nicer boyfriend than a real human. But he's kind of a clanker, right?

[Adam Alexik]

Well, the idea is you don't want your daughter dating a robot.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Amen to that.

[Adam Alexik]

Well, in 2060, that might be racist.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

Oh, God. Will the word clanker be around a year from now? Maybe not. Are these trendy words and memes among the world's most urgent issues? Definitely not. But as much as they are fun and interesting, there is a darker side to this world of algorithms and memes. I do want to make sure that. I ask you. There are people who are using language and the way the algorithm works to get across all kinds of ideas. And, you know, most recently the very upsetting and awful occurrence of Charlie Kirk, a conservative influencer was killed. But I guess I'm curious to hear he built a, a big following online in part through a very particular use of language. Right. It was short, punchy, geared for viralness. From your perspective, how does that illustrate the way that social media platforms are shaping the way public figures communicate?

[Adam Alexik]

Yeah, there's a sort of gotcha style that goes viral that you'll see Ben Shapiro or Charlie Kirk in the past use. That's like, like keep it concise, keep it clip farmed. So something that can go viral as a 30 second clip, some snarky sound bite, doesn't matter who's more correct, just who can go more viral. And if you can go more viral than the other person, you can out compete like rebuttals or counterpoints. So it's more about just get your idea out there, then have some measured response. And algorithms reward extreme things. Right. When we're talking about engagement optimization, what these algorithms are doing to get our attention, things that are good at getting attention are unfortunately really extreme things. So far left and far right, opinions and voices are going to be amplified. You know, AOC and Marjorie Taylor Greene are always going to go viral. Then my Congressman Rai grew up in Albany, New York. Paul Tonko, no offense, he's kind of boring. He doesn't go viral. Right. There's no kind of extreme point to his views. So it's not going to go as far on the algorithm. And so you have this ability of more extreme views to out compete less extreme views, diffuse further and then more people maybe start adopting that. It represents a new chance for people to donate money or I think Donald Trump is the first algorithmic president in the same way that Kennedy was the first TV president. He was famously kind of elected over Nixon because he looked more photogenic. And I think Donald Trump is the more memeable president. And if photogenic candidates were good on tv, memeable presidents are good for algorithms.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

I mean, one illustration I think of how, just back to Charlie Kirk, how this can play out in real life. I had a conversation with a friend, a mom who said to me, I hate to admit it, I had not heard of Charlie Kirk, but I asked my 14 year old son if he had and he said, duh, mom, of course I have. I'm a white 14 year old kid on social media. I'm targeted exactly by them. Of course I've seen his videos. The fact that he understood what he was getting and why he was getting and do you think that the younger generation is more savvy and are they questioning what the information that they're getting because they are thinking about the medium?

[Adam Alexik]

Yes. I actually have so much optimism for the younger generation. I actually think older generations are maybe more concerningly illiterate of the new medium. The first people to get tricked by slop were boomers on Facebook and there was like a shrimp Jesus that went viral. I think young people generally have a decent understanding of, of, oh, this could be AI. This might not be real. Or like, this is the algorithm, and the algorithm is not necessarily showing me what I want. When people engage less with new media, they are less aware of how some things are fake or overrepresented. But yes, definitely, it is still a pipeline for younger people to get radicalized. A lot of this comes directly out of extreme ideology built on 4chan.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

Some of the linguistic communities created by the algorithm can be actively harmed. Many younger people have started using the suffix pilled to mean convinced into a lifestyle. If I recently discovered that I really like eating burritos, for example, I can say, I'm so burrito pilled. But that word was formed through analogy with black pilled, a term meaning convinced into incel ideology. Now, incels are a d dangerous, misogynistic group. And yet somehow the vocabulary is filtering into Gen Z slang because the algorithm gave these hate groups a space. And again, many people don't even know where it came from. But for the few people who might be interested in the underlying idea, it's now more accessible to them because of the way that slang spreads on the Internet.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

What do you think that means? You just said you were an optimist for younger generation. But after hearing you say that, I worry a lot.

[Adam Alexik]

I'm an optimist for younger generations having literacy about this stuff. I am not an optimist in terms of algorithms and how they impact our culture. I do want to draw that distinction between language and culture because I sort of comment on both a lot. And I think language is fine and there's nothing wrong with individual words. They're never brainwraught. I do think I think the same way as Chianti, language points us towards greater cultural shifts. You see a lot of words coming from that 4chan manosphere space, and we should be paying attention to why are these words coming out of that space. It's because that space is good at creating memes that export their ideology. And sometimes their ideology is very intertwined with far right ideas and aesthetics. And yeah, that's kind of A problem of algorithms themselves, how they push extreme perspectives. What I said earlier about mixing media, I really hope that we come to realize as a culture that we should not just be relying on algorithms for our news, but also, you know, mainstream news has its own biases. It's good to get news from as many places as possible and build a greater picture of reality. It's good to build your stories of who people are through in person connections as well, because algorithms are going to show you a flattened representation of what society is.

[Narrator/Additional Commentary Voice]

I do think we should be aware. We should be aware when the way we're talking may have been conditioned by the algorithm. We should be aware when the words we're using may have been engineered to sell us things. We should be aware when our language regurgitates extremist rhetoric. And we should be aware when that language can be used to harm other people. We should be aware of etymology in general because it helps us better understand who we are today. We should be aware. And with that, I have just one final piece of slang for you. It's a common phrase used by younger people when we finish a long winded explanation of something. Thanks for coming to my TED Talk.

[Minouche Zamorodi]

That was Adam Alexik. He's the author of Algo How Social Media Is Transforming the Future of Language. You can find him tymologynerd on social media and you can see his [e-mail] thank you so much for listening to our show today. If you enjoyed it, leave us a comment. What words are you using? We would love to know. You can do that on Spotify or email [e-mail] we love hearing from you. This episode was produced by Matthew Cloutier and edited by Sanaz, Ben Meshkinpour and me. Our production staff at NPR also includes James Delahousy, Rachel Faulkner White, Katie Monteleone, Fiona Guerin, Harsha Nehada and Phoebe Lett. Our executive producer is Irene Noguchi. Our audio engineers were Damien Herring and Gilly Moon. Our theme music was written by Ramtin Arablouei. Our partners at TED are Chris Anderson, Roxanne Hylash and Daniella Balarezzo. I'm Minouche Zummer and you've been listening to the TED Radio Hour from npr.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice]

This message comes from Mint Mobile. At Mint Mobile, their favorite word is no. No contracts, no monthly bills, no hidden fees. Plans start at $15 a month. Make the [e-mail] switch. That's mintmobile.com switch. Upfront payment of $45 for 3 month 5GB plan required equivalent to $15 a month new customer offer for first 3 months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. This message comes from EasyCater, a business tool for food helping organizations order food for meetings and events from favorite restaurants with search tools for dietary needs, budget per person, and more. EasyCater also offers employee lunch programs, tools for managing food spend, flexible payment options, and simplified expense reporting. Plus 24. 7 live support all on one platform. Learn [e-mail] this message is from Synchrony.

[Sponsor/Advertisement Voice 2]

Bank, who wants to remind you to stay flexible. Not the yoga bending circus performing kind of flexible, financially flexible like with their high Yield savings account. Stay [e-mail] NPR member FDIC.