Loading summary
A
This episode is brought to you by Capital One. Capital One's tech team isn't just talking about multi agentic AI. They already deployed one. It's called Chat Concierge and it's simplifying car shopping using self reflection and layered reasoning with live API checks. It doesn't just help buyers find a car they love, it helps schedule a test drive, get pre approved for financing and and estimate trade in value. Advanced, intuitive and deployed. That's how they stack. That's technology at Capital One.
B
This is Car Tracks with Turtle Wax. Your car says a lot about you. So if we asked your car what it would say about you, what would it say? Listen, you dropped one of those tiny cheeseburgers under the seat like last week and now we're both dry heaving at the stench. Do us a favor, grab some Turtle Wax and let's get to work. This has been Car Tracks with Turtle Wax. You are how you car tired of your car insurance rate going up? Even with a clean driving record, you're not alone. That's why there's Jerry, your proactive insurance assistant. Jerry compares rates side by side from over 50 top insurers and helps you switch with ease. Jerry even tracks market rates and alerts you when it's best to shop. No spam calls, no hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year. Switch with conf. Download the Jerry app or visit Jerry AI Acast Today.
C
You'Re listening to TED Talks Daily where we bring you new ideas to spark your curiosity every day. I'm your host, Elise Hu. Do schools kill creativity? It's a question that has made today's talk the a classic, one of the most watched TED talks of all time. So for back to school season, we are sharing author and educator Sir Ken Robinson's 2006 talk, which for all of you TED nerds out there was one of the first talks we ever published online where Sir Ken makes the profound case for why creativity is vital to our world and why creating an education system that nurtures rather than undermines creativity is a necessity.
D
It's been great, hasn't it? I've been blown away by the whole thing. In fact, I'm leaving. There have been three themes, haven't there, running through the conference, which are relevant to what I want to talk about. One is the extraordinary evidence of human creativity in all of the presentations that we've had and in all the people here, just the variety of it and the range of it. The second is that it's put Us in a place where we have no idea what's going to happen in terms of the future, no idea how this may play out. I have an interest in education, actually. What I find is everybody has an interest in education, don't you? I found this very interesting. If you did at a dinner party and you say you work in education, actually, you're not often at dinner parties, frankly. If you work in education, you're not asked, you know, and you're never asked back, curiously, that's me. But if you are and you say to somebody, what do you do? And you say you work in education, you can see the blood run from their face. They think, oh, my God, you know, why me? My one night out all week. But if you ask people about their education, they pin you to the wall because it's one of those things that goes deep with people, am I right? Like religion and money and other things. So I have a big interest in education, and I think we all do. We have a huge vested interest in it, partly because it's education that's meant to take us into this future that we can't grasp. If you think of it, children starting school this year will be retiring in 2065. Nobody has a clue what the world will look like in five years time. And yet we're meant to be educating them for it. So the unpredictability, I think, is extraordinary. And the third part of this is that we've all agreed nonetheless on the really extraordinary capacities that children have, their capacities for innovation. I mean, Serena last night was a marvel, wasn't she? Just seeing what she could do. And she's exceptional, but I think she's not, so to speak, exceptional in the whole of childhood. What you have there is a person of extraordinary dedication who found a talent. And my contention is all kids have tremendous talents and we squander them pretty ruthlessly. So I want to talk about education and I want to talk about creativity. My contention is that creativity now is as important in education as literacy, and we should treat it with the same status. Thank you. That was it, by the way. Thank you very much. So, 15 minutes left. Well, I was born. No, the. I had a great story recently, I love telling it of a little girl who was in a drawing lesson. She was 6, and she was at the back drawing. And the teacher said, this little girl hardly ever paid attention. And in this drawing lesson she did. And the teacher was fascinated. She went over to and she said, what are you drawing? And the girl said, I'm drawing a picture of God. And the teacher said, but nobody knows what God looks like. And the girl said, they will in a minute. When my son was four in England, actually, he was four everywhere, to be honest. I mean, for being strict about it, wherever he went. He was four that year. But he was in the nativity play. Do you remember the story? No. It was big. It was a big story. Mel Gibson did the sequel. You may have seen it. Nativity too. But James got the part of Joseph, which we were thrilled about. We consider this to be one of the lead parts. We had the place crammed full of agents and T shirts. You know, James Robinson is Joseph. He didn't have to speak. But you know the bit where the three kings come in now they come in bearing gifts and they bring gold, frankincense and myrrh. This really happened. We're sitting there and they, I think, just went out of sequence because we talked to the little boy afterwards and said, you know, are you okay with that? And they said, yeah. Why was that wrong? They just switched. I think that was it. Anyway, the three boys came in, little four year olds with tea towels on their heads, and they put these boxes down. The first boy said, I bring you gold. And the second boy said, I bring you mare. And the third boy said, frank sent this. What these things have in common is that kids will take a chance. If they don't know, they'll have a go. Am I right? They're not frightened of being wrong. Now, I don't mean to say that being wrong is the same thing as being. Being creative. What we do know is if you're not prepared to be wrong, you'll never come up with anything original if you're not prepared to be wrong. And by the time they get to be adults, most kids have lost that capacity. They have become frightened of being wrong. And we run our companies this, by the way, we stigmatize mistakes. And we're now running national education systems where mistakes are the worst thing you can make. And the result is that we are educating people out of their creative capacities. Picasso once said this. He said that all children are born artists. The problem is to remain an artist as we grow up. I believe this passionately, that we don't grow into creativity, we grow out of it. Or rather, we get educated out of it. So why is this? I lived in Stratford on Avon until about five years ago. In fact, we moved from Stratford to Los Angeles. So you can imagine what a seamless transition this was from la. Actually, we lived in a place called Snitterfield Just outside Stratford, which is where Shakespeare's father was born. Are you struck by a new thought? I was. You don't think of Shakespeare having a father, do you? Do you? Because you don't think of Shakespeare being a child, do you? Shakespeare being seven. I never thought of it. I mean, he was seven. At some point he was in somebody's English class, wasn't he, really? How annoying would that be? Must try harder. Being sent to bed by his dad to Shakespeare. Go to bed now to William Shakespeare. And put the pencil down and stop speaking like that. You know, it's. It's. It's confusing everybody. Anyway, we moved from Stratford to Los Angeles, and I just want to say a word about the transition. Actually, my son didn't want to come. I've got two kids. He's 21 now and my daughter's 16. He didn't want to come to Los Angeles. He loved it. But he had a girlfriend in England. This was the love of his life, Sarah. He'd known her for a month. Mind you, they'd had their fourth anniversary because it's a long time when you're 16. Anyway, he was really upset on the plane. He said, I'll never find another girl like Sarah. And we were rather pleased about that, frankly, because she was. She was. She was the main reason we were leaving the country. But something strikes you when you move to America and when you travel around the world. Every education system on Earth has the same hierarchy of subjects. Everyone doesn't matter where you go. You think it would be otherwise, but it isn't. At the top are mathematics and languages, then the humanities, in the bottom of the arts. Everywhere on Earth, and in pretty much every system, too, there's a hierarchy within the arts. Art and music are normally given a higher status in schools than drama and dance. There isn't an education system on the planet that teaches dance every day to children the way we teach them. Mathematics. Why? Why not? I think this is rather important. I think maths is very important, but so is dance. Children dance all the time, if they're allowed to. We all do. We all have bodies, don't we? Did I miss a meeting? I mean, I think truthfully, what happens is, as children grow up, we start to educate them progressively from the waist up, and then we focus on their heads and slightly to one side. If you were to visit education as an alien and say, what's it for public education? I think you'd have to conclude if you look at the output, who really succeeds by this? Who does everything they Should. Who gets all the brownie points? Who are the winners? I think you'd have to conclude the whole purpose of public education throughout the world is, is to produce university professors, isn't it? They're the people who come out the top. And I used to be one, so there, you know, and I like university professors, but, you know, we shouldn't hold them up as the high watermark of all human achievement. They're just a form of life, you know, another form of life. But they're rather curious, and I say this out of affection for them. There's something curious about professors in my experience, not all of them, but typically they live in their heads. They live up there and slightly to one side, they're disembodied, you know, in a kind of literal way. You know, they look upon their body as a form of transport for their heads. You know, it's. Don't they. It's a way of getting their head to meetings. If you want real evidence of out of body experiences, by the way, get yourself along to a residential conference for senior academics and pop into the discotheque on the final night. And there you will see it, grown men and women writhing uncontrollably off the beat. Wait until it ends so they can go home and write a paper about it. Now our education system is predicated on the idea of academic ability. And there's a reason the whole system was invented around the world. There were no public systems of education really before the 19th century. They all came into being to meet the needs of industrialism. So the hierarchy is rooted on two ideas. Number one, that the most useful subjects for work are at the top. So you were probably steered benignly away from things at school when you were a kid, things you liked on the ground. You would never get a job doing that, is that right? Don't do music, you're not going to be a musician. Don't do art, you won't be an artist. Benign advice now profoundly mistaken. The whole world is engulfed in a revolution. And the second is academic ability, which has really come to dominate our view of intelligence, because the universities designed the system in their image. If you think of it, the whole system of public education around the world is a protracted process of university entrance. And the consequence is that many highly talented, brilliant, creative people think they're not, because the thing they were good at at school wasn't valued or was actually stigmatized. And I think we can't afford to go on that way in the next 30 years. According to UNESCO, more people worldwide will be graduating through education than since the beginning of history. More people. And it's the combination of technology and its transformational effect on work and demography and the huge explosion in population. Suddenly, degrees aren't worth anything. Isn't that true? When I was a student, if you had a degree, you had a job. If you didn't have a job, it's because you didn't want one. And I didn't want one, frankly. But now kids with degrees are often heading home to carry on playing video games because you need an MA where the previous job required a BA and now you need a PhD for the other. It's a process of academic inflation and it indicates the whole structure of education is shifting beneath our feet. We need to radically rethink our view of intelligence. We know three things about intelligence. One, it's diverse. We think about the world in all the ways that we experience it. We think visually, we think in sound, we think kinesthetically, we think in abstract terms, we think in movement. Secondly, intelligence is dynamic. If you look at the interactions of a human brain, intelligence is wonderfully interactive. The brain isn't divided into compartments. In fact, creativity, which I define as the process of having original ideas that have value more often than not, comes about through the interaction of different disciplinary ways of seeing things. The brain is intentionally, by the way, there's a shaft of nerves that joins the two halves of the brain called the corpus callosum. It's thicker in women. I think this is probably why women are better at multitasking, because you are. There's a raft of research, but I know it from my personal life. If my wife is cooking a meal at home, which is not often, thankfully, but, you know, if she's doing. No, she's good at some things, but if she's cooking, you know, she's dealing with people on the phone, she's talking to the kids, she's painting the ceiling. You know, she's doing open heart surgery over here. If I'm cooking, the door is shut, the kids are out, the phone's on the hook. If she comes in, I get annoyed. I say, terry, please, I'm trying to fry an egg in here. You know, give me a break. Actually, there was. Do you know that old philosophical thing, if a tree falls in a forest and nobody hears it, did it happen? Remember that old chestnut? I saw a great T shirt really recently, which said, if a man speaks his mind in a forest and no woman hears him, is he still wrong? And the third thing about intelligence is it's distinct. I'm doing a new book at the moment called Epiphany, which is based on a series of interviews with people about how they discovered their talent. I'm fascinated by how people got to be there. It's really prompted by a conversation I had with a wonderful woman who most people have never heard of. She's called Gillian Lin. Have you heard of her? Some have. She's a choreographer and everybody knows her work. She did Cats and Phantom of the Opera. She's wonderful. I used to be on the board of the Royal Ballet in England. Anyway, Gillian and I had lunch one day. I said, how did you get to be a dancer? And she said it was interesting. When she was at school, she was really hopeless. And the school in the 30s, wrote to her parents, said, we think Gillian has a learning disorder. She couldn't concentrate, she was fidgeting. I think now they'd say she had ADHD, wouldn't you? But this was the 1930s, and ADHD hadn't been invented at this point, so it wasn't an available condition. You know, people. People weren't aware they could have that. Anyway, she went to see this specialist to this oak paneled room, and she was there with her mother. And she was led and sat on this chair at the end. And she sat on her hands for 20 minutes while this man talked to her mother about all the problems Gillian was having at school. And at the end of it, because she was disturbing people, homework was always late and so on. Little kid of eight. In the end, the doctor went and sat next to Julian, Said, gillian, I've listened to all these things that your mother's told me. I need to speak to her privately. So he said, wait here, we'll be back. We won't be very long. And they went and left her. But as they went out the room, he turned on the radio that was sitting on his desk. And when they got out of the room, he said to her mother, just stand and watch her. And the minute they left the room, she said she was on her feet, moving to the music. And they watched for a few minutes. And he turned to her mother and he said, you know, Mrs. Lynn, Gillian isn't sick. She's a dancer. Take her to a dance school. I said, what happened? Said she did. I can't tell you how wonderful it was. We walked in this room and it was full of people like me, people who couldn't sit still, people who had to move to think, who had to move to think. They did ballet, they did tap they did jazz, they did modern, they contemporary. She was eventually auditioned for the Royal Ballet School. She became a soloist. She had a wonderful career at the Royal Ballet. She eventually graduated from the Royal Ballet School, found her own company, the Gillian Dance Company. Met Andrew Lloyd Webber. She's been responsible for some of the most successful musical theatre productions in history. She's given pleasure to millions and she's a multimillionaire. Somebody else might have put on medication and told her to calm down. Now I think what I think it comes to is I believe our only hope for the future is to adopt a new conception of human ecology, one in which we start to reconstitute our conception of the richness of human capacity. Our education system has mined our minds in the way that we strip mined the earth for a particular commodity and for the future it won't serve us. We have to rethink the fundamental principles on which we're educating our children. There was a wonderful quote by Jonas Salk who said, if all the insects were to disappear from the earth within 50 years, all life on earth would end. If all human beings disappeared from the earth within 50 years, all forms of life would flourish. And he's right. What TED celebrates is the gift of the human imagination. We have to be careful now that we use this gift wisely. And the only way we'll do it is by seeing our creative capacities for the richness they are and seeing our children for the hope that they are. And our task is to educate their whole being so they can face this future. By the way, we may not see this future, but they will. And our job is to help them make something of it. Thank you very much.
C
That was sir ken Robinson at TED 2006. The talk was first published in June 2006. If you're curious about TED's curation, find out more@ted.com curationguidelines and that's it for today. TED Talks Daily is part of the TED Audio Collective. This talk was fact checked by the TED research team and produced and edited by our team, Martha Estefanos, Oliver Friedman, Brian Greene, Lucy Little and Tansika Songmanivong. This episode was mixed by Christopher Faizy Bogan. Additional support from Emma Tobner and Daniela Balarazo. I'm Elise Hu. I'll be back tomorrow with a fresh idea for your feedback. Thanks for listening.
D
At Chubb, we set the gold standard in insurance.
C
We deliver tailored solutions that help protect.
D
What matters most to you.
C
Backed by bold innovation and forward thinking coverage. That's excellence in action.
B
Learn more@chubb.com banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One Bank Guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too. Ah, really? Thanks Capital One Bank Guy. What's in your wallet? Term supply See CapitalOne.com Bank Capital One NA Member FDIC if you're alignment in charge of keeping the lights on, Grainger understands that you go to great lengths and sometimes heights to ensure the power is always flowing. Which is why you can count on Grainger for professional grade products and next day delivery. So you have everything you need to get the job done. Call 1-800-GRAINGER call click granger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done.
Episode: Do schools kill creativity? | Sir Ken Robinson (re-release)
Date: August 30, 2025
In this classic and widely celebrated TED Talk, Sir Ken Robinson passionately critiques the structure of modern education systems and argues for the vital importance of creativity in schools. He emphasizes that education should nurture – rather than undermine – creativity to prepare children for an unpredictable future. The talk is laced with Robinson’s signature wit, humor, and storytelling, making a profound and compelling case for educational reform.
| Timestamp | Speaker / Quote | |---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------| | 03:52 | Robinson: “Creativity now is as important in education as literacy, and we should treat it with the same status.” | | 07:40 | Robinson: "What these things have in common is that kids will take a chance. If they don't know, they'll have a go. Am I right? They're not frightened of being wrong." | | 08:45 | Robinson quoting Picasso: "All children are born artists. The problem is to remain an artist as we grow up." | | 10:30 | Robinson: “Every education system on Earth has the same hierarchy of subjects... At the top are mathematics and languages, then the humanities, in the bottom of the arts.” | | 19:37 | Robinson: "Gillian isn't sick. She's a dancer. Take her to a dance school." | | 20:45 | Robinson: “Our education system has mined our minds in the way that we strip-mined the earth for a particular commodity, and for the future it won’t serve us.” | | 21:02 | Robinson: “Our task is to educate their whole being so they can face this future. By the way, we may not see this future, but they will. And our job is to help them make something of it.” |
Sir Ken Robinson's TED Talk remains a compelling, thought-provoking critique of mainstream education systems and a powerful call to action. With wit and wisdom, he urges educators, parents, and policymakers to recognize and foster the vast, diverse capacities for creativity in every child—reminding us that the future belongs to those who can think imaginatively and adaptively.